24
An update on Lygodium microphyllum biological control Heartland CISMA 25 February 2015 Melissa C. Smith Ellen C. Lake Phillip Tipping USDA-ARS Invasive Plant Research Lab Fort Lauderdale, Florida

An update on Lygodium microphyllum biological control...An update on Lygodium microphyllum biological control Heartland CISMA 25 February 2015 Melissa C. Smith Ellen C. Lake Phillip

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • An update on Lygodium microphyllum biological control

    Heartland CISMA 25 February 2015 Melissa C. Smith

    Ellen C. Lake Phillip Tipping

    USDA-ARS Invasive Plant Research Lab Fort Lauderdale, Florida

  • Lygodium microphyllum in South Florida…and beyond

  • Lygodium in Conservation Areas

    Flatford Swamp Greenswamp Wilderness Preserve

    A.R.M. Loxahatchee NWR

    Everglades National Park

  • Propagule pressure:

    • Each sorus has ~ 215 spores • Each fertile leaflet has ~ 133 sori • 215 X 133 = 28,500 spores per

    fertile leaflet (Volin et al. 2004)

    Sori

    L. microphyllum reproduction

  • Lygodium biological control: Moths that were, moths that are, and some moths that have not yet come to pass (and a mite)

    Austromusotima camptozonale

    Neomusotima conspurcatalis

    Lygomusotima stria

  • Neomusotima releases 2008 - 2009

    PresenterPresentation NotesMany of these releases are in the same locations as the Austromusotima, or white Lygodium mite that failed to establish in the field.

  • Neomusotima range 2012 - 2014

  • Neomusotima in the field

  • Neomusotima in the field

  • Neomusotima research

    Feeding preference • Do N. conspurcatalis

    larvae preferentially feed on fertile fronds?

    • Effects of fertile frond feeding on spore germination

    • Effects of fertile frond feeding on larval development time

  • Neomusotima research

    Feeding preference • 1st and 2nd Instar

    Larvae preferentially feed on fertile fronds in choice tests (p

  • Choice Feeding Trial

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile

    A A B B C C D D E E

    Cm2 c

    onsu

    med

    per

    indi

    vidu

    al

    Leaf

    Fertile Sterile

    a*

    b*

    a*

    b*

  • No-Choice Feeding Trail

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile

    A A B B C C D D E E

    Cm2

    cons

    umed

    per

    indi

    vidu

    al

    Leaf

    Fertile Sterile

    a*

    b*

    a*

    b*

  • Oviposition Preference Trial

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    Fertile Sterile

    Larv

    ae p

    rodu

    ced

    per f

    emal

    e

    Leaf Type

    a*

    b*

  • Neomusotima research

    Spore germination • Passage through the

    gut of the caterpillar only resulted in 2 prothalli

  • Neomusotima research

    Development time • Fertile frond feeding

    did not significantly affect larval development time or successful emergence to adult.

    • Did not measure “downstream” effects in adults or larval size.

  • Integrated weed management

    • Control • Neomusotima only • Herbicide only • Neomusotima and

    herbicide

  • Floracarus perrepae (Eriophyidae)

    Freeman et al. 2005

    • Transfers of galled material 2008 – 2010 • Very low establishment success measured in

    2011 • Thought to be haplotype specific? • Does wet or dry season release timing

    determine establishment?

  • F. perrepae damage

    • Australia: Goolsby et al. (2004)

    • Reduced aboveground biomass by 49%

    • Reduced belowground biomass by 35%

    • In Florida: • Reduction of formation

    of fertile fronds? • Are mite and moth

    damage synergistic?

  • F. perrepae releases 2008

  • F. perrepae range 2015

  • Lygodium and CERP

    • 300,000 N. conspurcatalis released since Q1 2014

    • 60,000 F. perrepae released since Q1 2014

    • Mass rearing and release of N. conspurcatalis and F. perrepae

    • Follow up to determine “success” (establishment, impact, dispersal)

    • Priorities given to natural areas

  • Future directions • Collaboration with CSIRO Australia to

    investigate apparent haplotype mismatch • Determine the relative impacts of the moth

    alone, the mite alone, and the two together • Build occupancy models to predict “patches”

    where moths could occupy and focus releases

  • Acknowledgments

    Southwest FloridaWater Management District

    An update on Lygodium microphyllum biological controlLygodium microphyllum in South Florida…and beyondLygodium in Conservation AreasL. microphyllum reproductionLygodium biological control:Neomusotima releases 2008 - 2009Neomusotima range 2012 - 2014Neomusotima in the fieldNeomusotima in the fieldNeomusotima researchNeomusotima researchChoice Feeding TrialNo-Choice Feeding TrailOviposition Preference TrialNeomusotima researchNeomusotima researchIntegrated weed managementFloracarus perrepae (Eriophyidae)�F. perrepae damageSlide Number 20F. perrepae range 2015Lygodium and CERP Future directionsAcknowledgments