25
Measurement Data: from Well to Awareness www.SpiritIT.com CUSTODY TRANSFER DATA MANAGEMENT Han van Dal AN INTEGRAL APPROACH TO

AN INTEGRAL APPROACH TO - Spirit IT · PDF fileAN INTEGRAL APPROACH TO . ... 11 . MISMEASUREMENT DETECTION Flow computer alarms ... API MPMS 12.2 bbl 65 API 60 75.5 ᵒF 200 psi

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Measurement Data: from Well to Awareness www.SpiritIT.com

    CUSTODY TRANSFER DATA MANAGEMENT

    Han van Dal

    AN INTEGRAL APPROACH TO

  • STATEMENT

    With respect to Custody Transfer Data the current generation of Metering Control Systems is

    dumb

    inaccurate

    time-consuming

    www.SpiritIT.com

    2

  • CONTENTS

    What is Custody Transfer Data?

    What can be improved?

    Mismeasurement management

    Relation to system uncertainty

    Case study

    Conclusions

    www.SpiritIT.com

    3

  • CUSTODY TRANSFER DATA

    API MPMS 21.1 (Gas) & 21.2 (Liquid)

    Quantity Transaction Records

    Configuration Logs

    HW & SW Versions

    Event Logs

    Field Test Reports

    Corrections with their reason

    Why?

    To verify correctness of data

    To allow for correction of failures

    www.SpiritIT.com

    4

  • OLD SITUATION Custody Transfer Data = Set of printouts

    www.SpiritIT.com

    5

  • CURRENT SITUATION Custody Transfer Data = Set of electronic files

    www.SpiritIT.com

    6

  • WHAT CAN BE IMPROVED?

    Metering Control Systems are made for:

    Daily operation

    and not for:

    Technicians

    Metering specialists

    Auditors

    Accounting staff

    www.SpiritIT.com

    7

  • PURPOSE #1: CORRECTNESS OF DATA

    Are all settings correct?

    Any changes in settings, SW or HW?

    Calibrations performed in time?

    Any maintenance applied?

    Have measurement failures occurred?

    Have tickets been corrected?

    If so, how and why?

    www.SpiritIT.com

    8

  • PURPOSE #2: CORRECTION OF FAILURES

    How big is the error (financial value)?

    Is correction worth the trouble?

    What is the best guess for the failed input?

    How to accurately recalculate the ticket?

    How to convince the Buyer?

    www.SpiritIT.com

    9

  • WHAT ELSE CAN BE IMPROVED?

    Is the overall system accuracy within spec?

    Why wasnt the frozen value detected earlier?

    How is my meter doing?

    Is any transmitter drifting?

    Whats the density of water in all flowcomps?

    www.SpiritIT.com

    10

  • INTEGRAL CT DATA MANAGEMENT

    Relational data (meter tickets & audit trail)

    IT (data storage, cyber-security, integrity)

    Configuration management (FC, EFM)

    Mismeasurement management

    Detection

    Overview

    Correction

    www.SpiritIT.com

    11

  • MISMEASUREMENT DETECTION Flow computer alarms

    But also:

    Flow meter diagnostics

    Smart transmitter diagnostics

    QMI diagnostics

    On-line data validation

    On-line logical checks

    Control Charts

    CUSUM Charts

    -1.5

    -1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    www.SpiritIT.com

    12

  • MISMEASUREMENT OVERVIEW

    CT data trend

    Historical Meter Ticket Overview

    .. with Financial Correction

    Measurement Alarms

    Measurement Events

    www.SpiritIT.com

    13

  • MISMEASUREMENT CORRECTION

    Best guess for failed input?

    What was the correct setting?

    How to recalculate the ticket?

    How to convince the buyer?

    www.SpiritIT.com

    14

  • SYSTEM UNCERTAINTY

    Metering equipment

    Proving

    Sampling

    Laboratory analysis

    Flow computers

    Meter ticket recalculation

    API MPMS 12.2

    Proving (Meter factor)

    Sampling (density, BS&W)

    Meter ticket correction

    Equipment failures

    Faulty data entries

    Failed field calibrations

    www.SpiritIT.com

    15

  • METER TICKET RECALCULATION 1. BATCH NUMBER 050511

    2. TYPE OF LIQUID NG

    3. METER CLOSING READING (DATE/TIME) 05/06/11 00:00

    4. METER OPENING READING (DATE/TIME) 05/05/11 00:00

    5. NET DELIVERY TIME 24.001 hours

    6. METER CLOSING READING 23208593 bbl

    7. METER OPENING READING 23167330 bbl

    8. INDICATED VOLUME 41263 bbl

    9. AVERAGE FLOW RATE 1705.4 bbl/h

    10. GROSS VOLUME 41258.87 bbl

    11. AVERAGE METER FACTOR 1.0001

    12. OBSERVED RELATIVE DENSITY 0.0000 M

    13. OBSERVED TEMPERATURE 0.0 F M

    14. RELATIVE DENSITY AT 60F 0.6646

    15. WEIGHTED AVERAGE TEMPERATURE 94.4 F

    16. TEMPERATURE CORRECTION FACTOR (CTLm) 0.9732

    17. WEIGHTED AVERAGE PRESSURE 317.6 psig

    18. PRESSURE CORRECTION FACTOR (CPLm) 1.0044

    19. COMBINED CORRECTION FACTOR (CCFm) 0.9775

    20. NET STD VOL AT 60F & 14.696 psia (0 psig) 40355.30 bbls

    21. NET STD VOL AT 15C & 101.325 kPa (0 kPa (ga)) 6410.843 m3

    22. NET WEIGHT 4185.52 long tons

    22. NET WEIGHT 4252.70 metric tons

    www.SpiritIT.com

    16

  • METER TICKET RECALCULATION

    Up to 0.01% difference at stable conditions

    100000 bbl 65 API60

    75 F 195 psi

    GSV 99180 bbl

    100000 bbl 65 API60

    76 F 205 psi

    GSV 99120 bbl

    API MPMS 12.2 200000 bbl

    65 API60 75.5 F 200 psi

    GSV 198320 bbl

    www.SpiritIT.com

    17

  • METER TICKET RECALCULATION

    Significant difference at highly

    fluctuating conditions

    For example

    Flow computer

    GSV = 37942 bbl

    API MPMS 12.2

    GSV = 37978 bbl

    Up to 0.10%

    www.SpiritIT.com

    18

  • METER TICKET RECALCULATION 1. METER CLOSING READING (DATE/TIME) 05/06/11 00:00

    2. METER OPENING READING (DATE/TIME) 05/05/11 00:00

    3. NET DELIVERY TIME 24.001 hours

    6. METER CLOSING READING 23388.593 MMSCF

    7. METER OPENING READING 23167.330 MMSCF

    8. TOTAL VOLUME 221.263 MMSCF

    11. AVERAGE FLOW RATE 221.012 MMSCFD

    12. AVERAGE DIFF PRESSURE 23.12 inch WC

    13. AVERAGE TEMPERATURE 113.3 F

    17. AVERAGE STATIC PRESSURE 1317.6 psig

    18. AVERAGE DENSITY 6.45 lb/SCF

    Inaccurate for

    Gas

    dP flow meters

    q (dP x P) FWA dP is useless

    www.SpiritIT.com

    19

  • METER TICKET CORRECTION

    Case : Temperature fails for 35 minutes

    What is the additional uncertainty of the different correction methods for liquid and gas ?

    www.SpiritIT.com

    20

  • METER TICKET CORRECTION Basic conventional correction method

    Optimal conventional correction method

    www.SpiritIT.com

    21

  • METER TICKET CORRECTION New API MPMS Ch21 based correction method

    * Patent pending *

    www.SpiritIT.com

    22

  • METER TICKET CORRECTION

    Relative to corrected quantity that would have been calculated at 1 sec resolution

    Correction Liquid Turbine

    Steady

    Liquid

    Turbine

    Fluctuating

    Gas

    Orifice

    FWA dP

    Gas

    Orifice

    TWA dPxP

    Basic correction 0.06% 0.83% 3.22% 0.30%

    Optimal correction 0.02% 0.14% 3.22% 0.22%

    API 21 based cor. 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

    www.SpiritIT.com

    23

  • CONCLUSIONS Accurate correction is currently NOT possible for many applications

    New API 21 method is accurate for all meter types, liquid and gas

    Automation of Mismeasurement Management

    makes systems smart

    saves time and resources

    avoids disputes with buyer

    dumb smart

    inaccurate accurate

    time-consuming time-saving

    www.SpiritIT.com

    24

  • Measurement Data: from Well to Awareness www.SpiritIT.com

    THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION Questions?

    Smart, accurate and highly automated

    Metering Control Systems

    to achieve comprehensive and integral

    Custody Transfer Data

    Management