Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AGENDA
WHY ALTERNATIVES
- HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
- REGULATORY & ENVIRONMENTAL
PRESSURE
- MARKET PRESSURE
ALTERNATIVES
- ETHOXYLATED ALCOHOLS
- BIO-RENEWABLES
- CATIONIC/NONIONIC BLENDS
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
APE INTRODUCTION – UK IN 1940s
WASTE WATER TREATMENT STUDIES
BIODEGRADABILITY - NOT READILY BIODEGRADABLE
TOXICITY OF DEGRADATION PRODUCTS
BIOACCUMULATION
ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS
REGULATORY PRESSURE
CALIFORNIA STATUS
Table 94509(m)(3) Product Categories in which Use of Alkylphenol Ethoxylate Surfactants is Prohibited
Product Category Effective Date Sell-through Date
General Purpose Cleaner (nonaerosol)
12/31/2012 12/31/2015
General Purpose Degreaser (nonaerosol)
12/31/2012 12/31/2015
Glass Cleaner (nonaerosol) 12/31/2012 12/31/2015
Heavy-duty Hand Cleaner or Soap (nonaerosol)
12/31/2013 12/31/2016
Oven or Grill Cleaner 12/31/2012 12/31/2015
REGULATORY PRESSURE
• NP and NPE’s will soon be added to EPA’s new
Chemicals of Concern List Under the “Nonylphenol
(NP) and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPEs) Action Plan
number [RIN 2070-ZA09].
• This will begin in 2014, and result in:
- Significant new use rules will be issued for
these materials even in existing formulations.
- The agency will add them to the list of Chemicals
that companies must report under the Toxics
Release Inventory (TRI)
TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI)
US EPA DfE Program / CleanGredients® “The U.S. EPA's Design for the Environment program helps consumers,
businesses, and institutional buyers identify cleaning and other products that
perform well, are cost-effective, and are safer for the environment.”
Surfactants in cleaning products are distinguished by their rate of
biodegradation, degradation products, and level of aquatic toxicity. The DfE
Criteria for Surfactants combine these hazard characteristics, and requires that
surfactants with higher aquatic toxicity demonstrate a faster rate of
biodegradation without degradation to products of concern.
US EPA DfE Home CleanGredients Home
9
Acute Aquatic Toxicity (L/E/IC50 Value)1
Rate of Biodegradation
≤1 ppm May be acceptable if biodegradation2 occurs within a 10-day window without products of concern3
>1 ppm and ≤10 ppm Biodegradation2 occurs within a 10-day window without products of concern3
>10 ppm Biodegradation2 occurs within 28 days without products of concern3
1. In general, there is a predictable relationship between acute aquatic toxicity and chronic aquatic toxicity for organic chemicals, i.e. chemicals that have high acute aquatic toxicity also have high chronic aquatic toxicity. Since acute aquatic toxicity data are more readily available, the DfE Criteria use these data to screen chemicals that may be toxic to aquatic life. 2. Generally, >60% mineralization (to CO2 and water) in 28 days. 3. Products of concern are compounds with high acute aquatic toxicity (L/E/IC50 ≤ 10ppm) and a slow rate of biodegradation (greater than 28 days).
AQUATIC TOXICITY
10
• DAPHNIA MAGNA (48 hours) - mg/L
NP – 0.035 (EC50)
NP-4 – 4.9-5.7 (LC50) 1.6-10 (EC50)
NP-9 – 9.3-21.4 (LC50)
NP-15 – 23.1-71.8 (LC50)
WHAT ARE ALTERNATIVES
SURFACE ACTIVE PROPERTIES OF APE’s
• WETTING – FOR HARD AND “SOFT” SURFACES
• DETERGENCY – MULTI-APPLICATIONS
• EMULSIFICATION – OIL TO EMULSION POLYMERS
• DISPERSING, SOLUBILIZING, STABILIZING, COMPATABLIZING
ETHOXYLATED ALCOHOLS
SYNTHETIC AND NATURAL BASED
• CHEMISTRY - C -9-11, 11-15, 12-15, 12-13, 12-14, 12-16
LINEAR – KNOWN FOR WETTING
BRANCHED - KNOWN FOR EMULSIFYING
MOLES OF EO – 1 – 40
ETHOXYLATED ALCOHOLS
SYNTHETIC AND NATURAL BASED
• PROs FASTER WETTING
BETTER LOW TEMPERATURE DETERGENCY
BETTER COLD WATER SOLUBILITY -NARROW OR NO GEL RANGE
• CONS – LINEAR ALCOHOL ETHOXYLATES
MOST CASES APEs GIVE BETTER EMULSIFICATION
APE’s MORE EFFECTIVE SOLUBLIZERS
APE’s GIVE BETTER HIGH TEMPERATURE > 60C DETERGENCY
BIO-RENEWABLES
SUGAR-BASE
• CHEMISTRY -
ETHOXYLATED SORBITAN ESTERS BASED TYPICALLY ON C- 12, 16 & 18 FATTY ESTERS
MOLES OF EO – 4, 5, 20
ALKYL POLYGLUCOSIDES (APG)
SOME OF FIRST BIO-RENEWABLES
BIO-RENEWABLES
ETHOXYLATED SORBITAN ESTERS
• PROs EXCELLENT EMULSIFIERS
LOW TOXICITY
GIVES LUBRICANT PROPERTIES
• CONS COST
BIO-RENEWABLES
ALKYL POLYGLUCOSIDES
• PROs HIGHLY ALKALINE STABLE
HELP TO PREVENT STREAKING
GOOD DETERGENT AND WETTING PROPERTIES
• CONS COST
CATIONIC/ NONIONIC BLEND
SPECIFIC TO NP-9 (ALCOHOL ETHOXYLATE &
CATIONIC )
• PROs BETTER WETTER
EXCEEDS DETERGENT EFFICIENCY
COLD WATER SOLUBLE
• CONS COST
ANIONIC SURFACTANT INCOMPATIBILITY
APEs ARE BEING USHERED OUT
GREEN MOVEMENT HERE TO STAY
THERE ARE ALTERNATIVES
TRADEOFFS INEVITABLE
CONCLUSIONS