An Alternative Surgical Approach to Managed Mirizzi Syndrome

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/25/2019 An Alternative Surgical Approach to Managed Mirizzi Syndrome

    1/3

    PO Box 2345, Beijing 100023, China World J Gastroenterol 2006 September 14: 12(34): 5579-5581

    www.wjgnet.com World Journal of GastroenterologyISSN 1007-9327

    [email protected] 2006 The WJG Press. All rights reserved.

    An alternative surgical approach to a difficult case of Mirizzi

    syndrome: A case report and review of the literature

    Michael Safioleas, Michael Stamatakos, Constantinos Revenas, Constantinos Chatziconstantinou,

    Constantinos Safioleas, Alkiviades Kostakis

    Michael Safioleas, Michael Stamatakos, ConstantinosSafioleas, Alkiviades Kostakis,2

    ndDepartment of Propedeutic

    Surgery, School of Medicine, Athens University, Laiko Hospital,

    Greece

    Constantinos Revenas, Constantinos Chatziconstantinou,Department of Radiology, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece

    Correspondence to: Professor Michael Safioleas, MD, PhD,7Kyprou Ave. Filothei, 15237 Athens,

    Greece. [email protected]

    Telephone:+30-210-6812188Received:2006-05-27 Accepted:2006-06-15

    Abstract

    Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is an uncommon complication ofgallstone disease and occurs in approximately 1% of allpatients suffering from cholelithiasis. The syndrome ischaracterized by extrinsic compression of the common

    hepatic duct frequently resulting in clinical presentationof intermittent or constant jaundice. Most cases are notidentified preoperatively. Surgery is the indicated treat-ment for patients with MS. We report here a 71-year-old male patient referred to the surgical outpatientdepartment for diffuse upper abdominal pain and mildjaundice (bilirubin rate: 4.2 mg/dL). Ultrasound examina-tion revealed a stone in the cystic duct compressing thecommon hepatic duct. The patient had a history of gas-trectomy for gastric ulcer 30 years ago. MRCP revealed astone impacted in the cystic duct causing obstruction ofthe common hepatic duct by extrinsic compression. Withthese findings the preoperative diagnosis was indicative

    of MS. At laparotomy a moderately shrunken gallbladderwas found embedded in adhesions containing a largestone which was palpable in the common bile duct. Theanterior wall of the body of the gallbladder was openedby an incision which extended longitudinally along thegallbladder towards the common bile duct. The stonemeasuring 3.0 cm in diameter, was then removed set-ting astride a large communication with the common bileduct. A Roux-en-Y cholecysto-choledocho-jejunostomywas performed. The subhepatic region was drained. Thepatient had an uneventful recovery. He was dischargedeleven days after operation and remained well after a30-mo follow-up.

    2006 The WJG Press. All rights reserved.

    Key words:Benign jaundice; Hepatic duct obstruction;Impacted gallstone; Cholecystobiliary fistula

    Safioleas M, Stamatakos M, Revenas C, Chatziconstantinou

    C, Safioleas C, Kostakis A. An alternative surgical approach

    to a difficult case of Mirizzi syndrome: A case report and

    review of the literature.World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(34):

    5579-5581

    http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/12/5579.asp

    INTRODUCTION

    Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is a rare complication of long-standing cholelithiasis, which results from impaction of alarge calculus or multiple small stones in the cystic duct orin the neck of the gallbladder causing extrinsic narrowingof the common hepatic duct. This condition may resultin the clinical presentation of intermittent or constant

    jaundice. MS occurs in approximately 1% of all patientswith cholelithiasis. Although modern imaging techniquesare available, the majority of cases are identified duringsurgery. During the last two decades, 27 patients sufferingfrom MS have been treated in our department [1,2], wepresent here a case of a 71-year-old male patient with MSand a literature review.

    CASE REPORT

    A 71-year-old male patient was referred to the surgicaloutpatient department for diffuse upper abdominalpain and mild jaundice (bilirubin rate: 4.2 mg/dL).

    Ultrasound examination revealed a stone in the cystic ductcompressing the common hepatic duct (Figure 1). Thepatient had a history of gastrectomy for gastric ulcer 30years ago, thus ERCP was not feasibile. MRCP revealeda stone impacted in the cystic duct causing obstructionof the common hepatic duct by extrinsic compression.Wi th th es e fi nd in gs th e pr eo pe ra ti ve di ag nosis wasindicative of MS. At laparotomy a moderately shrunkengallbladder was found embedded in adhesions containinga large stone which was palpable in the common bileduct (Figure 2A). It was obvious that the local operativecircumstances required great surgical care. Therefore the

    anterior wall of the body of the gallbladder was openedby an incision which extended longitudinally along thegallbladder towards the common bile duct. The cysticduct could not be identified. The stone measuring 3.0cm in diameter was then removed setting astride a large

    CASE REPORT

    www.wjgnet.com

  • 7/25/2019 An Alternative Surgical Approach to Managed Mirizzi Syndrome

    2/3www.wjgnet.com

    communication with the common bile duct (Figure 2B).Based on this finding and because the risk of stricture atthe site of fistulae was significant, we decided to bypassthe cholecystocholedochal fistulus defect rather than toclose it directly or by using a gallbladder flap for closingthe opening of the common bile duct around a T-tube.A Roux-en-Y cholecysto-choledocho-jejunostomy wasperformed (Figure 2C). The subhepatic region wasdrained. The patient had an uneventful recovery. He wasdischarged on the 11th postoperative day and remained

    well after a 30-mo follow-up.

    DISCUSSION

    MS was first described in 1948 as obstructive jaundice dueto a gallstone impacted in the cystic duct or Hartmannspouch compressing the common hepatic duct[3]. McSherry et al[4] in 1982 suggested a subclassificationof MS into two types. The first type concerns the externalcompression of the common hepatic duct by a calculusin the cystic duct or Hartmanns pouch, whereas in thesecond type the stone has entered partly or completelyinto the common bile duct, resulting in a cholecysto-choledochal fistula. Furthermore, in 1989 a new

    classification of patients with MS and cholecystobiliaryfistulae was presented by Csendes et al[5],which includesfour types: type I lesion includes those with externalcompression of the common bile duct; type lesion is acholecystobiliary fistula present with erosion of less thanone third of the circumference of the bile duct; type lesion is a fistula involving up to two-thirds of the ductcircumference; typelesion is a complete destruction ofthe bile duct. MS and cholecystobiliary fistulae therefore appear tobe different, evolving stages of the same pathologicalcondition, thus it is reasonable that Lubbers[6] proposes

    that the term MS can now be abandoned, since it is onlythe first stage of a more complex process. Gallstone erosion into the common duct is neverthelessa rare complication of cholelithiasis with an incidence rateranging from 0.7% to 1.4% of all patients undergoing

    cholecystectomy[7]. The clinical diagnosis of MS is difficult, since there areno pathognomonic patterns of presentation. Ultrasoundis diagnostically the best screening method, with ERCP

    and/or MRCP to confirm the diagnosis. MRCP canbe as good as ERCP in the diagnosis and its ability todelineate details of biliary structures, but its disadvantagecompared to ERCP is its inability to confirm the presenceof fistulae and does not afford therapeutic stenting. Onthe other hand, T2weighted sections can differentiate aneoplastic mass from an inflammatory one, that cannot bedetected by ultrasonogram or CT scan[8]. Finally intraductalultrasound, as an adjunct to ERCP, can also be of help[9].Despite of all these modern diagnostic tools, the problemmay become apparent only during surgery. Surg i ca l t rea tmen t for type I MS is par t ia lcholecystectomy leaving the neck of the gallbladder

    in place[10]. In some cases, open or laparoscopic totalcholecystectomy may be performed [11]. However someauthors consider this a contraindication for laparoscopiccholecystectomy[12-14]. Surgical treatment of typeMS is less clearly defined.Corlette and Bismuth [15] have recommended partialcholecystectomy, oversuturing of the gallbladder cuff andinsertion of a T-tube through the fistula as an adequatetreatment for typeMS. Choledochoplasty is an acceptable therapeutic approachbut the amount of gallbladder tissue employed for this hasnot yet been standardized[16].

    Furthermore, cholecystoduodenostomy has beendescribed[17]and hepaticojejunectomy[18]can also be used ifcomplete destruction of the common hepatic duct occurs. Reconstruction of the extrahepatic biliary tree in caseof MS type with bypass of the lesion using a Roux-

    Figure 1 Ultrasound showing a stone compressing the common hepatic duct.

    GE50.6

    12

    3

    >>_

    MI < 0.4

    CN28 cmDR66G 72

    1 Gall bladder

    2 Cystic duct

    3 Common hepatic duct

    >> Stone

    Figure 2 Schematic representation of the described technique during laparotomy

    (A, B) and Roux-en-Y cholecysto-choledocho-jejunostomy (C).

    A

    B

    C

    5580 ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R World J Gastroenterol September 14, 2006 Volume 12 Number 34

  • 7/25/2019 An Alternative Surgical Approach to Managed Mirizzi Syndrome

    3/3

    en-Y cholecysto-choledochal-jejunostomy as in our casecan be carried out. To our knowledge, this is the first casedescribed in the literature. In conclusion, since the preoperative diagnosis of MScannot be achieved, an awarded suspicion is necessary toavoid a lesion of the biliary tree if firm adherence around

    Carlots triangle is found. The success of treatment isrelated to a precocious recognition of the condition evenat the time of surgery when the individual characteristicsof each case are considered[18].

    REFERENCES

    1 Safioleas M, Yiagos E, Doka P, Koskinas A, Stefanou J,Skalkeas Gr. Mirizzi Syndrome. Medical Annals1990; 13 :863-866

    2 Safioleas M, Evagelidakis E, Xypolitas N, Liossi A. MirizziSyndrome.Medical Annals1999; 12: 545-547

    3 Mirizzi PL. Syndrome del conducto hepatico. Jo ur na lInternational de Chirurgie1948; 8: 731-737

    4 McSherry CK, Ferstenberg H, Virshup M. The Mirizzisyndrome: suggested classification and surgical therapy. SurgGastroenterol1982; 1: 219-225

    5 Csendes A, Diaz JC, Burdiles P, Maluenda F, Nava O.Mirizzi syndrome and cholecystobiliary fistula: a unifyingclassification. Br J Surg1989; 76: 1139-1143

    6 Lubbers EJ. Mirizzi syndrome. World J Surg1983; 7: 780-7857 Pemberton M, Wells AD. The Mirizzi syndrome. Postgrad Med

    J1997; 73: 487-4908 Choi BW, Kim MJ, Chung JJ, Chung JB, Yoo HS, Lee JT.

    Radiologic findings of Mirizzi syndrome with emphasis onMRI. Yonsei Med J2000; 41: 144-146

    9 Phatak N, Kochman ML. Biliary endoscopy. Curr OpinGastroenterol2004; 20: 281-287

    10 Abou-Saif A, Al-Kawas FH. Complications of gallstonedisease: Mirizzi syndrome, cholecystocholedochal fistula, andgallstone ileus.Am J Gastroenterol2002; 97: 249-254

    11 Yeh CN, Jan YY, Chen MF. Laparoscopic treatment for Mirizzisyndrome. Surg Endosc2003; 17: 1573-1578

    12 Posta CG. Unexpected Mirizzi anatomy: a major hazard to thecommon bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SurgLaparosc Endosc1995; 5: 412-414

    13 Bagia JS, North L, Hunt DR. Mirizzi syndrome: an extrahazard for laparoscopic surgery.ANZ J Surg2001; 71: 394-397

    14 Tan KY, Chng HC, Chen CY, Tan SM, Poh BK, Hoe MN.Mirizzi syndrome: noteworthy aspects of a retrospective studyin one centre.ANZ J Surg2004; 74: 833-837

    15 Corlette MB, Bismuth H. Biliobiliary fistula. A trap in thesurgery of cholelithiasis.Arch Surg1975; 110: 377-383

    16 Shah OJ, Dar MA, Wani MA, Wani NA. Management ofMirizzi syndrome: a new surgical approach. ANZ J Surg 2001;71: 423-427

    17 Baer HU, Matthews JB, Schweizer WP, Gertsch P, BlumgartLH. Management of the Mirizzi syndrome and the surgicalimplications of cholecystcholedochal fistula. Br J Surg1990; 77:743-745

    18 Johnson LW, Sehon JK, Lee WC, Zibari GB, McDonald JC.Mirizzi's syndrome: experience from a multi-institutionalreview.Am Surg2001; 67: 11-14

    S- Editor Wang J L- EditorWang XL E- Editor Bi L

    Safioleas M et al. MS 5581

    www.wjgnet.com