14
© 2015 Evidera. All Rights Reserved. An ACE for Alzheimer’s Disease: state of the art modeling J Jaime Caro MDCM FRCPC FACP Chief Scientist IPECAD 2015 Boston

An ACE for Alzheimer’s Disease: state of the art modeling · 2015. 11. 23. · DICE Aspects that persist over time Can have levels, which can change over time Many conditions can

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • © 2015 Evidera. All Rights Reserved.

    An ACE for Alzheimer’s Disease: state of the art modeling

    J Jaime Caro MDCM FRCPC FACPChief Scientist

    IPECAD 2015Boston

  • Why a new model?

    Need a framework that can simulate disease modification and early intervention

    – Include interactions across multiple components of the physiology– Incorporate all relevant biomarkers and their connections to disease progression

    Additional benefits:– Available now, hence no wait while model is built– Easily customizable to accommodate new information, different assumptions– Transparent and easy to use– Actively being validated and published in peer-reviewed journals.

    2

  • DICE

    Aspects that persist over time

    Can have levels, which can change over time

    Many conditions can be present at once

    Interested in time spent at a given level (value)

    Aspects that happen at a point in time

    Characterized by a risk of happening (or sequence)

    Many can happen, at any time

    Interested in number that happen (and when)

    Conditions Events

    Discrete Integrator 3

  • The AD ACE

    44

    Death Institutional care

    Profiles

    Treatment Adverse events

    Screening(early diagnosis)

    Cognition

    Behavior

    Function

    DependenceBiomarkers

    Disease progression

    Context

    NPIFAQGDS

    DS

    Event Condition Both

    Baseline ageSex

    RaceEducationEthnicityApoE4

    Baseline DxMarital statusFamily history

    Medical history/drugs

    Hippocampus MRIFDG-PETPIB-PET

    CSF Aβ42Whole brain MRIVentricles MRI

    18F-AV-45 amyloid imagingCSF p-tau

    DADECogFAQNTB

    MMSEADAS-cogCDR-SBMoCARALVTECogFAQNTB

  • Data Sources

    Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)– Longitudinal, multicenter, non-randomized, non-treatment, natural history study – Tracks progression of AD over the course of different disease states using

    biomarkers and cognition scales

    Assessment of Health Economics in Alzheimer's Disease (AHEAD) model equations

    – Developed from individual patient data (published)

    Literature– Costs (default US) Gustavsson et al

    o Keyed to disease stage (MMSE)

    – Utility includes patient (DADE) and caregiver utility (AHEAD)– Mortality (AHEAD based CERAD data)

    5

  • Equations (Linear mixed models)

    Expected value of some appropriate function of a measure of interest

    Intercept (patient-specific)

    Appropriate function of time that reflects observed

    pattern

    Baseline predictors

    Linking Variables: Time-dependent values of other

    related measures at time s < t

    Measure History: Past values of response measure, possibly transformed, at time s < t.

    6

  • Formulation of Response and Predictors

    0 tk-2 tktk-1Time

    tk−2 tk−1

    tk−2

    tk

    tk−1

    Predict change in measure between successive visits

    Expected value analysed as change from previous visit:

    Prior values and other related measures

    considered as predictors

    Rates of change also considered:

    7

  • Inter-Dependencies

    T-Tau

    Hip. Vol.

    FDG

    A-Beta

    MMSE

    ADAS-Cog

    CDRSB

    NPI

    8

  • Patient Profiles

    Population defined by a set of profiles

    For the AD ACE, each profile is a record drawn directly from ADNI baseline patient data

    – Imputation of missing data using population average values– More sophisticated imputation under consideration– External/other data can be incorporated

    Patient filtering tool incorporated– Select characteristic(s) to filter on and specify criteria

    Disease stages not a predictor of progression -- included to allow – screening– treatment decisions– categorization of trial endpoints.

    9

  • Clinical Trial Simulation

    Add-on capability to the AD ACE– Cornerstone of this is simulated patient traces– Patients may be simulated beginning with normal cognition, prodromal AD, or AD

    10

  • Conclusion

    Challenges Addressed with AD ACE?

    Modeling of MCI/Prodromal ADInclude disease‐modifying therapiesConsider full heterogeneityComprehensive domains (not just cognition)Full interactions between domainsFlexible to adopt new information and definitions

    11

  • Back-ups

    12

  • Final MMSE Equation

    13

    Predictor Variable Estimate 95% LB 95% UBIntercept 4.5808 2.4247 6.7369Time since prev. visit (months) - TSPV 0.8814 0.5016 1.2612Age (years) 0.007586 0.001033 0.01414At least 1 copy of the ApoE4 allele (yes vs. no) 0.03918 -0.05704 0.1354Prior value of FDG -0.09916 -0.2537 0.05542TSPV*Prior FDG 0.08252 0.5016 1.2612Prior rate of change from prev. visit in FDG -1.4685 2.4247 6.7369Prior value of CDRSB -0.01131 -0.09183 0.06921TSPV*Prior CDRSB -0.03722 -0.05138 -0.02306Prior rate of change from prev. visit in CDRSB 1.9046 0.8565 2.9528TSPV*Prior rate of change from previous visit in CDRSB -0.3075 -0.4870 -0.1281

    Prior value of ADAS13 -0.02411 -0.04215 -0.00608TSPV*Prior value of ADAS13 -0.01289 -0.01622 -0.00955Prior rate of change from prev. visit in ADAS13 -0.2814 -0.4922 -0.07069TSPV*Prior rate of change from prev. visit in ADAS13 0.08004 0.04389 0.1162Prior value of MMSE -0.1462 -0.2075 -0.08491TSPV*Prior value of MMSE -0.04457 -0.05558 -0.03356Prior rate of change from prev. visit in MMSE 3.4055 2.9291 3.8820TSPV*Prior rate of change from prev. visit in MMSE -0.4942 -0.5753 -0.4131

  • Fit of MMSE Equation – Observed vs. Predicted by Disease Stage