Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Journal of Advanced Marine Science and Technology Society. Vol.14. No.2. pp. 1-8. 2008
Original paper
Dugong grazing scars confirmed
in Enhalus acoroides meadows
Yoshiei Nakanishi *', Kanjana Adulyanukosol *", Nobuaki Arai *3, Seiichi Hosoya *',
Yoshiko Nakanishi*1, Kazuhiko Kotani*1 and Kiyonori Katsukoshi*1
* 1 Okinawa Branch, Idea Consultants Inc., 2-6-19 Aja, Naha, Okinawa 900-0003, Japan
*2 Phuket Marine Biological Center, P.O. Box 60 Phuket 83000, Thailand
*3 Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
*4 Okinawa Environmental Research Inc., 2-6-19 Aja, Naha, Okinawa 900-0003, Japan
Received : July, 1. 2008. Accepted : March. 6. 2009
Abstract
We performed a survey from 27 to 30 October 2005 in the seagrass meadows along the southeast coast of Talibong Island. Trangprovince. Thailand. We found three typical characteristics of dugong grazing scars on Enhalus acoroides leaves. The bladeswere unevenly cut (not in straight lines), and these same general shapes were observed at the same abovegroiind height on allleaves. Tooth marks consistent with dugong molars were observed on E. acoroides leaves, and the shapes of grazing scars in E.acoroides meadows were elliptical, whereas scars found in meadows of small seagrass species were meandering lines.
Keywords : Dugong dugon, Enhalusacoroides. grazing scar, dugong feeding trail
1. Introduction
Dugongs (Dugong dugon) occur in the tropical/
subtropical areas of the Indo-Pacific Ocean (Nishiwaki
and Marsh. 1985). and these herbivorous marine
mammals feed on seagrasses (Heinsohn and Birch.
1972; Lipkin. 1975: Johnstone and Hudson. 1981:
Marsh et al.. 1982: Erftemeijer et al.. 1993: Preen.
1995: Andre et al., 2005). Seagrass meadows are very
important dugong feeding grounds (Anderson, 1994;
Preen and Marsh, 1995).
Analysis of stomach and mouth contents revealed
that dugongs feed on Enhalus acoroides, a seagrass
(Heinsohn and Birch. 1972: Johnstone and Hudson.
1981: Erftemeijer et al., 1993: Adulyanukosol et al.,
2001. 2005). However, although field observations have
confirmed that dugongs feed on a variety of seagrasses
(Aragones. 1994: De Iongh et al.. 1995. 1997: Mukai et
al., 2000: Adulyanukosol et al., 2003: Nakanishi et al.,
2005), few studies have observed dugongs feeding on
E. acoroides specifically. In one study, dugongs were
reported to feed primarily upon small seagrass species
such as Halophila ovalis, but not on E. acoroides,
in the Philippines (Aragones, 1994). In that report,
however, the author provided no information about
dugong grazing scars on E. acoroides.
A thorough description of the shape and
characteristics of dugong grazing scars is essential to
understanding feeding ecology in seagrass meadows.
This paper describes the shape and characteristics of
dugong grazing scars in E. acoroides meadows.
2. Materials and methods
2.1 Study area
In Thailand, dugongs have been found along
the coastlines of both the Gulf of Thailand and the
Andaman Sea. The largest group of dugongs inhabits
the waters around Talibong Island, in Trang province
(Adulyanukosol et al., 1997: Adulyanukosol and
Chantrapornsyl, 1999: Adulyanukosol. 2000; Hines
et al., 2005). where the largest seagrass bed in Thai
waters is also located (Chansang and Poovachiranon.
1994: Poovachiranon. 2000).
This survey was performed around Talibong Island.
The substrate around the island is sandy mud. and
the seagrass meadows surrounding the island are
reportedly composed of 11 species of seagrass: E.
acoroides, Halophila heccarii, Halophila decipiens, H.
ovalis, Halophila minor, Thalassia hemprichii, Cymodocea
serrulata, Cymodocea rotundata, Halodule pinifolia,
Halodule uninervis, and Syringodium isoetifolium
(Nakanishi et al., 2005. 2006). Dugongs have been
observed feeding on these seagrasses (Nakanishi et al.,
2005.2006).
Our study sites are indicated in Fig. 1. At Site A, E.
acoroides was scattered among H. ovalis communities.
At sites 1-9, there were a lot of E. acoroides populations.
Yoshiei Nakanishi. Kanjana Adulyanukosol. Nobuaki Arai. Seiichi Hosoya, Yoshiko Nakanishi. Kazuhiko Kotani and Kiyonori Katsukoshi
— N7" 20. 000'
A.
•N7' 10 500'
E99: 20. 000'
•'ig. I Map of the study site around Talibong Island. Trang province. Thailand. Closed circles indicate dugong grazing study sitesin E. acoroides meadows. A opened triangle denotes a study site in which dugongs grazed on E. acoroides in /-/. ovalis-dominated meadows.
2.2 Methods
Field observations were made by scuba divers
from 27 to 30 October 2005. At Site A. which was
primarily populated by H. ovalis. we searched for
dugong grazing scars on scattered /;.'. acoroides leaves
that were left when dugongs fed on both E. acoroides
and H. ovalis. inside H. ovalis feeding trails. Within
these feeding trails, we measured the abovegroiind E.
acoroides leaf lengths, sampled plants, and observed
grazed sections of leaves.
Second, we searched for grazing scars on E.
acoroides leaves in E. acoroides meadows for 20 min
at Sites 1-9. At these sites, we measured aboveground
leaf lengths, sampled plants, and observed grazed
sections of leaves. We then determined whether these
grazing scars were caused by dugongs based on
comparisons to dugong grazing scars on E. acoroides
leaves found inside the H. ovalis feeding trails (Site A)
and key dugong grazing characteristics identified from
headframe and tooth samples.
In the laboratory, we determined the mean length
from the tip of the mouth to the molars based on
three dugong headframe specimens, which were
obtained from animals that drowned in fishing nets in
the Andaman Sea between 1997 and 2001. We then
measured and photographed the teeth of two dugong
specimens from the Andaman Sea collected in August
and November 2005(Table 1). The measurements and
photographs were used to identify whether dugongs
graze on /:'. acoroides and to verify how dugongs
graze on E. acoroides leaves.
3. Results
The mean abovegroiind grazed E. acoroides leaf
length from plants sampled within H. ovalis feeding
trails at Site A was 15.6 ± 5.3 cm (n = 17: Table 2).
The characteristics of dugong-grazed sections of E.
acoroides were as follows (Fig. 2) : 1) seagrass blades
were not usually cut in straight lines: 2) dugong-
grazed blade sections had similar shapes al the
same abovegroiind height, suggesting that dugongs
grazed several leaves at the same time: and 3) marks
Dugong grazing scars confirmed in Enhalus acoroides meadows
Table 1 I'holographs of two dugong specimens showing measurements of lhe molar teeth. UR. upper right: LL. upper leftlower left: LR, lower right.
LL.
Sample Information
Recorded Date
Area
Body Length
Body Weight
Recorded Date
Area
Body Length
Body Weight
9 August 2005
Phang-nga Province,Thailand
1.70 m
150 kg
27 November 2005
Trang Province,Thailand
2.0 m
180 kg
UR
Upper Jaw
1 2
| wide
Table 2 The abovegroiind leaf lengths of grazed /•.". acoroidessampled inside H. ovalis feeding trails (Site A) andE. acoroides at Sites 1 and 9 with grazing scars.
Study siteSite A
H. ovalismeadow
Site 1 Site 9E. acoroides £ acoroides
meadow meadow
Aboveground
leaf length
(cm)
5.4 8.2 17.0
6.5 11.4 17.0
8.5 11.7 17.1
11.5 11.9 17.5
13.6 12.1 17.6
14.0 12.2 17.9
14.3 12.3 18.3
15.8 12.7 20.1
16.5 13.5 20.2
16.8 14.1 21.0
17.3 14.2 23.2
18.5 20.1 23.6
19.5 21.0 24.5
20.8 30.2 24.6
21.5 24.8
22.1 24.9
23.2 25.0
26.2
26.7
N 17 14 19
Mean 15.6 14.7 21.4
SD 5.3 5.6 3.6
Lower Jaw Teeth
UR
UL
LL
LR
UR
UL
LL
LR
1(WXL)!2(WXL)(cm) | (cm)
0.88 X
1.21
0.90 X
1.17
0.88 X
1.21
0.87 X
0.95
0.90 X
0.97
0.71 X
0.96
3(WXL)(cm)
0.82 X
0.76
0.83 X
0.80
0.74 X
0.74
0.82 X
1.17
0.74 X 0.72 X
0.95 ' 0.74
1.37 X
2.25
1.44 X
2.10
1.40 X
2.25
1.44 X
2.27
1.47 X
1.24
1.40 X
1.51
1.34 X
1.32
1.40 X
1.50
4(WXL) 5(WXL)(cm) (cm)
0.55 X
0.70
0.60 X
0.70
0.60 X 0.34 X
0.66 0.36
0.62 X 0.30 X
0.61 0.34
resembling dugong molars were often observed on
/:'. acoroides leaves. In addition, the hard part of leaf
edges tended to remain on E. acoroides leaves grazed
by dugongs.
Grazing scars on E. acoroides blades, which were
cut al almost the same aboveground height, were
observed at Sites 1 (Fig. 3) and 9 (Fig. 1). The mean
aboveground grazed E. acoroides leaf length was 14.7 ±
5.6 cm at Site 1 (n= 14: Table 2) and 21,1 ± 3.6 cm al
Site 9(n= 19: Table 2). No significant difference was
observed between Site 1 and Site A in the lengths of
grazed E. acoroides leaves (Mann -Whitney U-tesl. p >
0.01). whereas the difference between Site 9 and Site
A was significant (Mann - Whitney U-test. p < 0.01).
However, the three longest grazed E. acoroides leaves
sampled within feeding trails at Site A ranged from
21.5 to 23.2 cm (Table 2); these leaves were longer
than the mean length of grazed E. acoroides leaves at
Site 9. The shapes of grazed sections of E. acoroides
leaves at Sites 1 ( Fig. 3) and 9 (Fig. A) were very-
similar to those at Site A (Fig. 2). The grazing scars
in /:'. acoroides meadows were elliptical, with longer
and shorter axes of 23 and 13 cm at Site 1. and 15 and
13 cm at Site 9, respectively.
Measurements and photographs of the molar teeth
Yoshiei Nakanishi. Kanjana Adulyanukosol. Nobuaki Arai. Seiichi Hosoya. Yoshiko Nakanishi. Kazuhiko Kolani and Kiyonori Katsukoshi
Table 3 The approximate length from the lip of the mouth to the molar and individual information on each bone specimen.
Sex Length Weight Date
Length from the
tip of the mouth
to the molar (cm)
Mean SD
Male 209 cm 166 kg 6 Mar. 2001 15
16.7 2.9Male 235 cm 228 kg 30 Aug. 1998 20
Male 192 cm 120 kg 18 Mar. 1997 15
d
I
HHRhHI•HHii^ni
Fig. 2 A variety of grazing scars on E. acoroides leaves. Dugong-grazed seagrass blade sections were not usually cul in straightlines, but had similar shapes at the same aboveground height, a. Dugong grazing scars on E. acoroides leaves found insidefeeding trails dominated by H. ovalis. b-f. Marks resembling dugong molars were observed on E. acoroides leaves, c-f.The hard part of leaf edges tended to remain on E. acoroides leaves grazed by dugongs.
Dugong grazing scars confirmed in Enhalus acoroides meadows
of two dugongs are shown in Table 1. Similar marks of
dugong molars were also observed on grazed sections
of E. acoroides leaves at Sites 1 and 9. The mean
length from the tip of the mouth to the molar of the
three headframe specimens was 16.7 ± 2.9 cm (Table
3). which was similar to the mean length of grazed
/:'. acoroides leaves at Site 1 (14.7 ± 5.6 cm; Table
2: Mann - Whitney U-lesl. p> 0.01). In addition, the
lengths of grazed E. acoroides leaves at Site 9(21.4 ±
3.6 cm: Table 2) did not differ significantly from mean
dugong mouth length (Mann-Whitney U-test. p>().()!).
c
'"•'•-.
4. Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe
dugong grazing scars on E. acoroides. Observations in
/-.'. acoroides meadows indicate that grazing scars were
elliptical in shape, whereas dugong feeding trails found
in meadows composed of small seagrass species were
long meandering lines, as reported by Adulyanukosol
et al (2003) and Nakanishi et al. (2005). Crazed E.
acoroides leaves were cut at almost Ihe same height at
both Sites 1 and 9. The difference in length of grazed
E. acoroides leaves between Site 1 and Site A was not
Fig 3 Examples of dugong grazing scars on /•.. acoroides from Site 1. Dugong-grazed seagrass blade sections were not usuallycut in straight lines, but had similar shapes at the same aboveground height a. E. acoroides leaves were cut at almost thesame aboveground leaf length, i.e.. around I 1.7 em. b-f. Marks resembling dugong molars were observed on E. acoroidesleaves, f. The hard pari of leaf edges tended to remain on grazed /;'. acoroides leaves.
Yoshiei Nakanishi. Kanjana Adulyanukosol, Nobuaki Arai. Seiichi llosoya. Yoshiko Nakanishi. Kazuliiko Kolani and Kivonori Kalsukoshi
significant (Mann - Whitney U-test. p> 0.01). but that
between Site 9 and Site A was significant (Mann -
Whitney U-test. p < 0.01). However, the three longest
grazed E. acoroides leaves, which were sampled
within feeding trails at Site A. were longer than the
mean length of grazed E. acoroides leaves at Site 9.
Therefore, dugongs may graze on E. acoroides leaves
at Site 9. In addition, the characteristics of grazed
E. acoroides plants at Sites 1 (Fig. 3) and 9 (Fig. 4)
were almost the identical to those at Site A (Fig. 2).
and dugong tooth marks were identified. The lengths
of E. acoroides leaves left behind at Sites 1 and 9 did
not differ significantly from the lengths from the tip
of the mouth to the molars of the dugongs (Mann
- Whitney U-test. p> 0.01 ). Based on these results,
dugongs appear to feed upon E. acoroides plants
using their molar teeth. Green turtles are also large
marine animals that graze on seagrasses: however,
the characteristics of green turtle grazing are distinct
from those observed at Sites 1 and 9. In general,
green turtles graze in a clean, straight line, and green
turtle grazing scars are typically dented in the central
Fig. 1 Examples of dugong grazing scars on /;. acoroides from Site 9. Dugong-grazed seagrass blade sections were not usuallycut in straight lines, but had similar shapes at the same aboveground height, a. E. acoroides leaves were cut al almost thesame aboveground leaf length, i.e.. around 21.-1 cm. b-f. Marks resembling dugong molars were observed on /•;. acoroidesleaves, f. The hard pari of leaf edges tended to remain on grazed E. acoroides leaves.
Dugong grazing scars confirmed in Enhalus acoroides meadows
region, resembling a mortar (Tabata and Nakanishi.
2005). Therefore, we concluded that the grazing scars
at Sites 1 and 9 were created by dugongs. rather than
green turtles.
The teeth of hindgut-fermenting herbivores usually
play an important role in food breakdown: however,
the morphology, small size, and occlusal variability of
dugong cheek teeth may indicate the lack of strong
selective pressure to maintain effective dentition
(Layon and Sanson, 2006). The horny pads of dugongs
may play a major role in food comminution. However,
our study indicates that dugongs feed on E. acoroides
leaves using their molar teeth. Moreover, the hard,
cellular tissue at the leaf edge tended to remain on
grazed E. acoroides leaves. Enriquez et al. (1992)
reported that E. acoroides leaves were thicker than
those of small seagrasses. Therefore, dugongs may
graze on the soft, thin leaves of small seagrasses using
the horny plate alone, whereas the molars are required
to cut tougher E. acoroides blades. Further studies,
including underwater observation and observation of
captive animals, are required to further clarify dugong
feeding habits.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Takeshi Hara, and all who helped in
this research.
References
Adulyanukosol. K.. 2000. Dugong survey in Thailand.
Biologia Marina Mediterranea 7(2). 191-194.
Adulyanukosol. K., Boukaew, P., Prasitthipornkul. A.,
2005. Analysis of stomach contents of dugongs
(Dugong dugon) from Gulf of Thailand.
SEASTAR2000 workshop in Bangkok December
2004. 45-51.
Adulyanukosol. K., Chantrapornsyl, S.. 1999. Report on
aerial surveys of dugong along the Andaman
Coast in 1997 and 1999 using the Royal Thai
Navy Aircraft. Technique Paper of Phuket
Marine Biological Center 15pp.
Adulyanukosol. K., Chantrapornsyl, S., Poovachiranon,
S.. 1997. An aerial survey of dugong (Dugong
dugon) in Andaman Coast. Tailand. Thai
Fisheries Gazette 50 (5). 359-374.
Adulyanukosol. K.. Poovachiranon. S.. Natakuathung. P..
2001. Analysis of stomach contents of dugongs
(Dugong dugon) from Trang Province. Thai
Fisheries Gazette 54 (2). 129-137.
Adulyanukosol. K., Thongsukdee, S., Poovachiranon. S.,
2003. An observation of dugong behaviors from
aerial survey and feeding trails of a cow-calf
pair in seagrass habitat. Journal of Environment
and Resource Mahidol University 1(2). 112-118.
Anderson. P. K.. 1994. Dugong distribution, the
seagrass Halophila spinulosa, and thermal
environment in winter in deeper waters of
Eastern Shark Bay. Western Australia. Wildl.
Res. 21, 381-388.
Andre. J.. Gyuris. E., Lawler, I. R., 2005. Comparison
of the diets of sympatric dugongs and green
turtles on the Orman Reefs, Torres Strait,
Australia. Wildl. Res. 32 (1), 53-62.
Aragones, L. V., 1994. Observations on dugongs at
Calauit Island. Busuanga. Palawan, Philippines.
Wildl. Res. 21. 709-717.
Chansang. H.. Poovachiranon. S., 1994. Distribution of
seagrass beds in the Andaman Sea. Phuket Mar.
Biol. Cent. Res. Bull. 59. 43-52.
De Iongh. H. H.. Bierhuizen. B.. Van Orden. B.. 1997.
Observations on the behaviour of the dugong
Dugong dugon (Miiller. 1776) from waters of
the Lease Islands, eastern Indonesia. Contrib.
Zool. 67(1). 71-77.
De Iongh. H. H.. Wenno, B. J.. Meelis, E., 1995. Seagrass
distribution and seasonal biomass changes in
relation to dugong grazing in the Moluccas. East
Indonesia. Aquat. Bot. 50. 1-19.
Enriquez, S., Agusti, S., Duarte, C. M.. 1992. Light
absorption by seagrass (Posidonia oceanica
(L.)) leaves. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 86. 201-204.
Erftemeijer. P. L.. Djunarlin. A.. Moka. W.. 1993.
Stomach content analysis of a dugong (Dugong
dugon) from south Sulawesi. Indonesia. Aust. J.
Mar. Freshw. Res. 44. 229-233.
Heinsohn. G. E.. Birch. W. R.. 1972. Foods and
feeding habits of the dugong. Dugong dugong
(Erxleben). in northern Queensland, Australia.
Mammalia 36. 414-422.
Hines. E.. Adulyanukosol. K., Duffus. D. A.. 2005.
Dugong (Dugong dugon) abundance along the
Andaman coast of Thailand. Marine Mammal
Science 21 (3). 536-549.
Johnstone, I. M., Hudson, B. E. T., 1981. The dugong
diet: Mouth sample analysis. Bull. Mar. Sci. 31
(3). 681-690.
Layon. J. M., Sanson, G. D.. 2006. Degenerate dentition
of the dugong (Dugong dugon). or why a grazer
does not need teeth: morphology, occlusion and
wear of mount parts. Journal of Zoology 268.
133-152.
Lipkin, Y.. 1975. Food of the Red Sea Dugong
(Mammalia: Sirenia) from Sinai. Israel Journal
of Zoology 24, 81-98.
Yoshiei Nakanishi. Kanjana Adulyanukosol. Nobuaki Arai. Seiichi Hosoya. Yoshiko Nakanishi. Kazuhiko Kotani and Kivonori Katsukoshi
Marsh. H.. Channells, P. W.. Heinsohn, G. E.. Morrissey.
J.. 1982. Analysis of stomach contents of dugongs
from Queensland. Aust. Wildl. Res. 9. 55-67.
Mukai. H.. Aioi, K., Lewmanomont, K„ Matsumasa, M..
Nakaoka, M.. Nojima. S.. Supanwanid. C, Suzuki,
T.. Toyohara. T.. 2000. Dugong grazing on
Halophila beds in Haad Chao Mai National Park,
Thailand. Biol. Mar. Medit. 7(2), 268-270.
Nakanishi, Y.. Hosoya. S.. Arai, N.. Nakanishi, Y.,
Katsukoshi. K.. Adulyanukosol. K.. 2006. The
distribution of seagrass meadows and dugong
feeding trails in the dry season around Talibong
Island. Trang province. Thailand. Abstract
book of the 3rd International symposium onSEASTAR2000 and Asian Bio-logging Science.
20.
Nakanishi. Y.. Hosoya. S.. Nakanishi. Y.. Arai. N..
Adulyanukosol. K... 2005. The distribution of
dugong trenches in the seagrass beds of Libong
Island. Thailand. J. Adv. Mar. Sci. Tech. Soci. 11
(1). 53-57.
Nishiwaki. M., Marsh, H.. 1985. Dugong. Dugong dugon
(Muller. 1776). In: Ridgway. S. H., Harrison.
R. (Eds.). Handbook of Marine Mammals, the
Sirenian and Baleen Whales Vol. 3.. Academic
Press, London. 1-31.
Poovachiranon. S.. 2000. Species composition and their
depth distribution of seagrass beds along the
Andaman sea coast of Thailand. Biologia Marina
Mediterranea 7(2). 412-416.
Preen. A.. 1995. Diet of dugongs: Are they omnivores?
J. Mammal. 76(1). 163-171.
Preen. A.. Marsh. H.. 1995. Response of dugongs to
large-scale loss of seagrass from Hervey Bay.
Queensland. Australia. Wildl. Res. 22. 507-519.
Tabata. S.. Nakanishi. Y.. 2005. Trace of green turtle
browsing on seagrass. 16lh Japanese Sea TurtleConference in Kuroshima. 14.
?J> 5J* ?J% 5J5 5J% 5j^ ?|?
i|»'ft*&*'' Kanjana Adulyanukosol*2 Mtmtt*3 *fflft$-*' 4»M7*' 'hSfH&*' 09&h)li!'•1 \,>X'$>&$:£WmiCtt. t 900-0003 etMUMiilJ#,12-6-19* 2 Phuket Marine Biological Center. P.O. Box 60 Phuket 83000. Thailand
*3 &»>:#A:^Ktffffi^fif*£#. f 606-8501 iKM#Ji(ffiT|j/i;JjCKi!fffl*nr•4 imw&M&w&£tt. t 900-0003 mw<m\<\ric®2-6-19
2008 *P 7 )\ 1 II -SH*. 2009 ¥ 3 H 6 13$&