Upload
evgeniy
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
1
Stable plasma formation in non uniform flow of
Propane - air mixture:
Propagation and transition to explosion.
Vladimir Chernikov, Sergey Kamenshchikov, Evgeniy Kolesnikov.
Faculty of Physics, M.V .Lomonosov Moscow State University, Vorobjevi Gory , Moscow, 119991,
Russia, [email protected], www.plasma-flow.com.
In current paper we discuss detonation and quasi detonation combustion that is initiated in propane – air
flow with initial parameters of M0=2, v0=500 m/s. Preliminary heat of flow and its inflammation are realized
by propagation of plasma formation, generated in magnetic plasma compressor. Parameters of plasma, its
initial composition and propagation dynamics are modeled in computational and experimental way. Time
resolution of combustion waves produced by plasma trace slow down is realized by optical and
electromechanical measurements. External parametric control of regime is achieved.
1. Introduction
Possible thermo dynamical benefits of pulsed detonation engines (PDE) were proved theoretically. One cycle of
PDE working on frequency of more than 100 Hz is more effective then engine base on deflagration [1].
Investigation devoted to deflagration – detonation transitions were carried out for stable mixture without account of
flow – igniter interaction. Several types of inflammation sources were applied and most of them are spark
discharges. This work is devoted to explosive combustion of supersonic flow and its complicated interaction with
extra hot volumetric plasma. A hot nucleus of plasma provides wide continuous range of temperature in plasma
formation that provides combustion even in not premixed flow. Not uniform structure of plasma provides
preliminary heat of flow, turbulent conductivity and transition to detonation on length of one meter order.
2. Experimental installation.
In current work plasma compressor with erosive plasmatron was used as plasma generator for initiation of
combustion. Plasmodynamic discharge was realized between external cylindrical cathode and internal anode divided
by isolator of organic glass (Figure 1a). Energy was accumulated by condensers and released by discharger of Tesla.
High current in erosive plasma in the beginning of discharge is of 1 kA order for such type of plasmatron. This
process creates compression by self magnetic field, so called effect of Pinch. As a result injection of plasma has
permanent direction and plasma focus as it is displayed on Figure 1b. Momentary inlet provides strong shock wave
and high atomic excitation by ultraviolet radiation. Maximum Mach number of shock is ten for investigated
discharge type.
a) Electric scheme. b) Scheme of physical processes.
Figure 1.
1 - disc (cathode), 2 - isolator (perspex), 3 - coupling, 4 - bar (anode), 5 - constant current supply
6 - discharger, PF – plasma focus, SW – shock wave, RW – radiation wave, S – radiation flow,
j – current density, v – plasma velocity, L – typical length.
48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition4 - 7 January 2010, Orlando, Florida
AIAA 2010-267
Copyright © 2010 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved.
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
2
Equivalent scheme of plasmodynamic discharge possesses own induction and capacity and consequently qualitative
image of electric input power has form of decreasing oscillation. On Figure 2 electric power and input energy are
represented. Diagrams were achieved for initial capacity of 50 µF. Initial voltage of power supply was 3 kV while
pressure of media was 0.13 Atm. From presented dependences one can came to conclusion that most of energy is
released during 100 µs of discharge and can be divided into two stages. Typical time of investigated flow was 5 ms
and plasmodynamic discharge can be described as Dirak delta function. Efficiency of gas heat, realized by discharge
current was investigated in preliminary experiments. It was found out that output/input energy dependence is linear
with factor of 0.7 for initial energy of 220-600 J. Therefore self resistance of discharge stays constant for mentioned
range of parameters.
a) Electric power. b) Input energy.
Figure 2.
For investigation of plasma – flow interaction magnetic plasma compressor was placed in first chamber of channel
that is displayed on Figure 1a. For supersonic flow provision atmospheric air was delivered by compressor to
channel through additional system of vessels (6), collector (5) and conduit (4). Air flow was launched by electronic
valve (8). Additional vessels (6) allowed increasing work volume of camera up to 0.5 m3.
a) Flow – plasma interaction study installation. b) Scheme of plasmatron placement.
Figure 3.
a)1 – vacuum chamber, 2 – compressor, 3 – valve, 4 – air conduit, 5 – collector, 6 – vessels, 7 – manometers, 8 –
pneumatic valves, 9 – heater, 10 – heater power supply , 11 – uniform channel, 12 – pressure sensors, 13 – not
uniform channel, 14 – illuminators, 15 – fuel injectors, 16 – plasma generator placement section, 17 – fuel supply.
b)1 – coaxial electrodes, 2 – plasma, 3 – reverse stream, 4 – backward step.
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
3
Work pressure of compressor was controlled by manometers (7) and could reach 6 Atm. Preliminary heat of air
could be reached by hollow spiral (9). After that it was delivered to channel (11) through Laval nozzle of M=2.
Pressure gradient necessary for organization of flow was created by compressor (2) and vacuum camera (1) with 3
m3 work volume. Fuel (propane) was injected from vessels (15) with pressure of 5 Atm directly in first division and
in the beginning of forming section (15) from four points in each section. Channel and corrugated tube (13) were
placed between system of fuel-air supply and work camera of low pressure. Triangular ledges of corrugated tube had
dimension of 1 cm for triangular perpendicular and basis. Speed camera, photo multiplier, refraction and pressure
sensors were used for experimental investigation of mechanism. For optical investigation two quartz illuminators
were placed in divisions walls. For determination of plasma temperature emission spectrum measurements were
realized through mentioned illuminators. On Figure 1b scheme of plasmatron placement is displayed. Degree
between plasma jet and flow vectors was 150°; plasma was injected in area of reverse stream. All dimensions on
Figure 1b correspond to centimeters.
3. Results of investigations.
For determination of plasma ability to ignite high speed mixture it is necessary to know its thermodynamic,
kinetic parameters and their time evolution. During this series of experiments emission spectrum of plasma was
measured. Previous experiments1 have shown that for initial stage of discharge with duration of 1-4 µs plasma is
composed from products of erosion and has electron concentration of 1016
cm3. Therefore one can make assumption
that during initial stage plasma exists in equilibrium state and radiation of certain lines occurs only during this stage.
It is close to truth for lines of ablation material of electrodes – copper2. In this case we may apply plasma model of
local thermodynamic equilibrium and determine plasma temperature by comparison of two copper lines with
wavelength of 521.8 and 578.2 nm. Average gas temperature that was determined for equilibrium stage of erosive
plasma is 10 000 K. Basing on this assumption numerical modeling of plasma composition was realized using GRI
Mech 3.0 library (325 reactions and 53 species). Below mass and energy balance equations are displayed.
D(ci·Vr)/Dt==Vr·Ri; Vr·Σ(ci·Cp,i·(D(T)/Dt))=ωs+Q+Qext+Vr·D(p)/Dt; Q= - Vr· ΣHjrj
Here ci is molar concentration of species, Vr - reactor volume, Ri - species rate, ci – molar concentrations of
components, Cp,i - molar capacity of components, T – temperature of mixture, ωs – additional work, Q - chemical
reactions heat, Qext - external heat, p – pressure of mixture, t – time, Hi – enthalpy of reactions, ri – reactions
velocity. Uniform composition of mixture and direct heat of gas were assumed. Term for external heat consists of
two summands: Joule heating and negative heat flow caused by thermal conductivity. Overall electric power is input
in magnetic field compression and heat of gas. It was assumed that magnetic field power in input only in
acceleration of jet in longitudinal direction and 0 v02
= B 2
/(20) (0 – initial density, v0 – velocity of plasma
jet, B - density of magnetic field induction). Therefore expression for pure heating of gas by electric power can
be written in following way: Qext=W0-W1-W2. Here W0 is overall electric power input, W1 – heat loss term, W2 –
magnetic field work. Expressions for these terms are given:
W0=U0·exp (-α·t) ·cos (ω·t) ·J0·exp (-α·t) ·cos (ω·t)
W1=λ· (T-T0); W2=D{Bφ·Vr (t)/ (4·μ0)}/Dt
Here U0 and J0 are amplitudes of current and voltage, α – relaxation coefficient that was determined
experimentally as well as frequency of oscillations in contour, B is induction of magnetic field that could be
expressed as
B= I·0/(2·r0) where r0 is plasmatron radius. For summands expressions D is differentiation
operator, T0 – initial temperature of mixture (temperature of flow) and λ is heat loss factor. Expression for heat
loss [3] was written above with account of uniform mixing. Therefore temperature, molar concentrations got in this
model correspond to average magnitude. Expression for heat loss factor3 can be displayed in following way:
λ=3.51·(Δ·q·E·k0·R·exp(-E/T0)·(2·R·T02)
-1)
0.5. Here Δ is thermal conductivity factor, q – specific heat (per
initial mass unit), E – activation energy for propane – air mixture, R – universal gas constant. Further calculations
will be made without taking into account of interaction between flow and plasma and until time of upper wall of
channel reaching. According to photo measurement of plasma – flow interaction in first division of channel plasma
propagation takes 45 μs for parameters used in all further experiments (Figure 4). On presented shots exposition of
camera was varied. In calculations of model determining plasma composition after upper wall reaching flow
influence on penetration of plasma jet was neglected. Estimation of square power for plasma jet and flow gives us:
η·C· (U0) 2/ (2· (τ·d
2)) = 10
10 for plasma jet and ρυ
3/2 = 10
7 for flow. Here η is part of accumulated energy
released in plasma, C – capacity of condensers, U0 – initial condenser voltage, τ – half period of current and
voltage, d – diameter of plasma jet, ρ – typical density of flow and υ is typical velocity of flow.
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
4
Figure 4. Plasma jet propagation in first division of channel.
Video measurements verify this estimation. On Figure 5 velocity of plasma jet longitudinal front is represented
as well as left front of plasma formation. One can see that average velocity of plasma jet propagation is 1.5 km/s
while flow typical velocity in undisturbed flow is 0.5 km/s (three times less). Left part of Figure 5 gives hint that by
upper wall reaching left plasma goes under flow influence and its left boundary velocity slows down to zero and
turns. Relative mass consumption used in represented experimental figures was 0.03 for φ=0.5 where φ=
(mpropane/mair) ·14.5. Composition of fuel mixture therefore was supposed to be constant in area of plasma injection.
Results of computational model have shown that process of chemical and thermodynamics evaluation of plasma can
be divided into two phases. First – is partial combustion and radical generation. Second one is thermal
decomposition of radicals and molecules into ions and atoms.
Figure 5. Velocity of front and left boundary evaluation.
As it was mentioned above we get equilibrium stage of plasma as initial time of calculation. Nevertheless further
propagation of plasma can pass stages of non equilibrium state. That’s why to make model more complete we
should take plasma effects into account. This is the material of future investigations. Still model is calculated
without taking into account of ionization and recombination processes in plasma. On Figure 6 one can see plasma
reactions with duration of 40 μs. Combustion stage occurs during 2-4 μs. From 10 μs and till end of process
dissociation takes place with partial association of nitrogen from 25 to 40 μs caused by decrease of power input
oscillations. Last are indirectly reflected by temperature evaluation. Determination of average parameters of mixture
has shown that by reach of upper wall plasma formation has temperature of 10 000 K. In fact formation is not
uniform and has relatively cold boundaries and hot nucleus. Nevertheless estimation of temperature permits to state
that deflagration may takes place on boundaries of plasma formation and may be strengthened by turbulent thermal
conductivity. Final composition of mixture represented on Figure 7 shows that by moment of upper wall reaching
plasma jet is mostly dissociated gas with small amount of nitrogen. Plasma nucleus therefore is inactive from the
point of view of combustion reaction in its volume in this moment. Only cooling down of formation may change its
ability to be ignited; at first stage of plasma propagation boundaries combustion is possible.
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
5
Figure 6a. Partial combustion of propane during 2-4 μs after discharge start.
Figure 6b. Dynamics of dissociation of molecules, radicals; partial association of nitrogen at 20-40 μs.
Figure 7. Final composition of mixture.
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
6
Measurements were made by photoelectron multiplier (PEM) with slit located near channel first division illuminator
(Figure 8). First sharp peak taken by PEM corresponded to electric noise of high voltage contour. Second peak
corresponds to propagation of illuminating areas. Experimental data shows that additional of propane in flow causes
extension of signal in time. Half width was enlarged from 250 to 500 μs; signal magnitude increased in 1.7 times.
Last is to due to large heat capacity of propane while increasing of illuminating area corresponds to combustion on
left and right boundary of plasma.
a) Air flow b) Propane – air flow.
Figure 8. Photoelectron multiplier signal for illumination in first division.
Further propagation of plasma in channel is followed by destruction of initial geometric consistency and quasi
spherical composition is transformed into two hot plasma formation divided by hot products of combustion.
Illumination of this complicated structure was fixed by photomultiplier located in front of forth channel division
illuminator. Two intensive peaks of signal corresponding to plasma illumination are divided by less “bright” area of
deflagration. Experiments with application of refraction sensor verified this version. Density perturbs were detected
by deviation of laser beam focused on photomultiplier split.
Figure 9. Photoelectron multiplier signal for illumination in forth division.
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
7
Additional collimating splits were used in this experiment (Figure 10a). Increase of PEM signal (with relation to
average level) corresponds to inlet of not uniform area, decrease of signal corresponds to its outlet. On Figure 10b
results for propagation of disturbances through forth division of channel are represented.
a) Refraction scheme b) Measurement in forth division.
Figure 10. Photoelectron multiplier signal for illumination in forth division.
Time distance between two disturbances is 2000 μs while for half width of illumination we have 2500 μs. Two
independent methods give good correlation and verify hypothesis of two plasma fronts with combustion products
between them. PEM measurements in first and forth divisions allow to determine average velocity in channel. It is
270 m/s and conclusion of partial chocking of flow can be made therefore. Besides longitudinal not uniform
composition of plasma its cross distribution of parameters is not uniform as well. Photo shots made with variable
expositions (Figure 11) show that plasma has more intensive illumination in the direction of lower wall. This fact is
caused by influence of backward step in first division of channel that provides more intensive compression and
disturbance for upper layers of gas than for lower ones lying in the area of gas dynamic shadow.
Figure 11. Video in forth division for different exposition times. Shutter opening time is discharge start.
Detection of further processes occurring in channel was realized by combination of tens metric static pressure
sensors and photoelectron multipliers located in front of forth division illuminator and camera entrance illuminator.
Both diagnostic instruments have fixed slowing down of plasma propagation in corrugated tube and appearance of
detonation and fast combustion waves propagating along flow direction and in opposite direction correspondingly.
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
8
On Figure 12 one can see propagation of pressure waves along the channel in time. Small disturbances caused by
plasma slow down have constant velocity of 135 m/s – depression wave propagating in opposite direction of general
flow. Slow down of plasma formation is caused by turbulent friction in corrugated tube. Strong disturbance
following plasma injection propagates with velocity of 681 m/s in mixture, 654 m/s in air flow and 577 m/s in still
air. Higher magnitude of disturbance in flow can be explained by additional rate of disturbance relaxation in still
flow relatively to one in pressure asymmetry case.
As it was mentioned above adding of propane with high heat capacity leads to more efficient power input with
relation to air case and to higher magnitude of wave consequently. Initially connected with plasma pressure
disturbances are carried away during propagation in channel due to difference in velocities (270 m/s for plasma
propagation and 731 m/s for pressure wave that is initiated by plasma). Nevertheless application of pressure sensors
allowed fixing quality of processes taking place in tube. Pressure disturbance caused by plasma propagation was
marked as “plasma” wave. Pressure waves caused by combustion and detonation are marked like explosive wave
due to strong blow sound producing by overall process during experiment. Actually two signals in opposite direction
were fixed in camera entrance and inside channel divisions. Pressure magnitude of direct detonation wave was
determined by expression for strong shock in one dimensional approximation:
v= {(c2· ((γ-1) + (γ+1) · (p2/p1))/ (2·γ))
0.5}
Here v – velocity of shock propagation, c – local sound velocity, γ – adiabatic factor, p1 – undisturbed flow pressure,
p2 – amplitude of shock. Calculation of this expression for wave with amplitude of 17 Atm gave 2.18 km/s velocity
and Mach number of eight – hypersonic detonation wave. Determination of Chapmen – Jug velocity of detonation
for the same parameters with adiabatic heat release can be made through following expression:
D= (γ· p1·V1 – (2· (γ-1) ·q) 0.5
)/ (2· (γ2-1) ·q· (γ+1))
0.5
V1 is reciprocal to undisturbed flow density, q – specific heat of mixture (per mass unit). Mentioned expression
gives 1.228 km/s for detonation velocity. Therefore hypersonic wave is over pressed detonation or transmission to
stable detonation of Chapmen – Jug after following of corrugated tube where it is formed.
Figure 12. Propagation of pressure waves in time.
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
9
Figure a) corresponds to dependence taken from sensor of camera entrance while b) – to one located in the end of
forth division. Represented diagrams are consequence of well known concentration limits for combustion processes.
In case of detonation wave gates of process are wider and this is consequence of intense turbulent mixing in
corrugated tube. Therefore on Figure 13 a) only left branch of dependence is displayed while Figure b) corresponds
to classic concentration curve of normal combustion. In order to obtain additional information about chemistry of
direct and reverse wave’s illumination measurement was realized by photoelectron multipliers located in front of
forth division illuminator and in front of camera entrance (Figure 14). It was detected that delay between shock and
luminosity appearance on second PEM is 2 ms that corresponds to theoretical induction time3 for mixture with
average temperature of 283 °K. Induction time here is estimated through adiabatic approximation:
Τind=(R·T02·exp (E/(R·T0)))/ (k0·a0· (Tb-T0));
Tb= (1+ (1-8·θ/E) 0.5
) ·E/4;
θ= (E· (1-(1-4·R·T0/E) 0.5
))/ (2·R) In displayed expression Tind is induction time, R is universal gas constant, T0 – initial temperature of mixture, k0 –
first order reaction velocity, a0 – weight concentration of mixture, Tb – adiabatic temperature of combustion, E –
activation energy.
a) Camera entrance b) Forth division
Figure 13. Propagation of pressure waves in time.
Preliminary investigation of undisturbed mixture temperature gave 200 °K. Sensitivity of induction time to initial
temperature doesn’t allow speaking about good correlation between estimated and experimental data, but order of
induction time is in typical range corresponding to combustion of propane – air mixture. Illumination character of
direct and reverse waves allow to state that for detonation wave it is relaxation layer with sharp boundary, while for
reverse wave volumetric inflammation takes place. It is typical for combustion that is formed in corrugated tubes.
Overall display of direct – reverse combustion and plasma propagation is represented on Figure 15. Here 1 - plasma
propagation process, 2 – reverse combustion wave propagation, 3 - direct combustion wave propagation. PEM
corresponding to lower channel at picture was placed in front of camera entrance illuminator. It can be seen from
represented diagram that in plasma volume illumination is stronger in 2.5 times as for combustion waves. Sensitivity
of described combustion regime to initial parameters variation was investigated as well. In this series of experiments
we were able to vary condensers voltage in certain range. Other parameters stayed constant because of firm
requirements of discharge existence. For plasmodynamic discharges of erosive type two basic processes take place
and are in competition: heat of gas and compression – acceleration of plasma. This processes define further
phenomena that are started by plasma influence.
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
10
a) Camera entrance b) Forth division
Figure 14. PEM measurement of illumination of combustion waves.
On Figure 16 a) normalized velocity of plasma left boundary propagation is represented. Due to competition of
mentioned processes it has local maximum corresponding to condensers initial voltage of 3.6 kV. It can be explained
from qualitative point of view.
Figure 15. PEM measurement of combustion waves illumination.
Primary expansion of plasma is caused by energy of jet propagation and its interaction with upper wall.
Intensity of this interaction is determined by initial velocity of jet that is defined like 0 v02
= B 2
/ (20) (0 –
initial density, v0 – velocity of plasma jet, B - density of magnetic field induction). Therefore increase of
initial condenses voltage leads to current increase and plasma propagation intensification. At the same time
generator power is input at gas heat. Described character of plasma expansion dependence allows explaining
combustion intensity increase and consequently combustion products illumination. As it was mentioned plasma
interacts with mixture during its propagation (it doesn’t occupy entire cross section of channel) and realizes its
preliminary heat.
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
11
a) Normalized propagation velocity of plasma b) Illumination of combustion in forth division
Figure 16.
Higher initial temperature of flow produces more advantageous conditions for intensity of reverse combustion wave
due to reactions acceleration by Arrhenius law. At the same time it slows down transition to detonation. Therefore
detonation wave is firmed faster in direction of flow then in opposite direction and reverse wave is process of
transition to detonation.
4. Conclusion.
Inflammation of high speed (M0=2, v0=500 m/s) propane – air mixture has been achieved by application of
plasmodynamic discharge of magnet plasma compressor. Propagation of plasma through channel and its slow
down in corrugated tube led to detonation and quasi detonation waves propagating from plasma trace in
opposite directions. Not uniform structure of plasma formation allowed making preliminary heat of mixture
by its propagation in channel and turbulent conductivity. Volumetric inflammation of mixture was realized
and external control of regime has been got by variation of initial condensers voltage. Most effective work
point of initial conditions has been found and its influence on further processes has been explained.
Acknowledgement
The work is performed with the financial support of EOARD (CRDF # RUP-1514-MO-06). Author express deep
gratitude to AIAA for online versions of articles devoted to plasma assisted combustion.
References
1S.M.Frolov. “Reactive engine based on detonation inflammation of fuel”. Fundamental and applied problems of
forcer engines improvement. 05-01-038, 2005. 2U.S.Protasov. “Radiation plasma dynamics”, 1981, p.58
3J.B.Zeldovisch, G.I.Barenblatt, V.B.Librovich, G.M.Maxviladze. “Mathematical theory of combustion and
explosion”, 1980, p. 128.