Upload
cristian-bailon
View
107
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Exploring the Causes of the Spanish Economic Crisis and Identifying How the
Country Could Improve Its Competitiveness
Cristian Bailón Gutierrez
MMU ID: 11048383
Supervisor: Prof Dr. Hamed El-Said
A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the
award of Master of Science in International Business Management by The Manchester Metropolitan University Business School.
April 2014
i
Declaration The author has not, whilst being registered for the Masters award, been a registered
candidate for another award of a university.
No material in this dissertation has been used in any other submission for an academic
award.
This dissertation is based on empirical research.
ii
Abstract The principal aim of this study is to conduct empirical research into Spain´s current
economic crisis. The crisis has been extensively studied in order to understand the impact
it has upon Spanish citizens, such as high levels of unemployment and staggering poverty
rates.
The study aims to identify the causes for Spain's crisis, contending that it was due
to an unsustainable economic model based on the property boom. In addition, it analyses
the austerity measures taken by Spanish and European Community institutions and their
effects. These measures are dismantling the Spanish welfare state, which has been
developed during the country's short time as a democratic nation. Alternative ways of
ending the crisis are proposed, through improving Spanish competitiveness; improving the
main pillars needed to establish and maintain a wealthy nation, such as the educational
system, productivity, innovation, the banking system and the labour market.
To meet the goals outlined in the study, the methodology has required strategic sampling,
focusing on five in-depth interviews with economists, politicians and a member of the 15M
Movement; as well as a focus group composed of highly qualified young Spaniards,
currently living and working in Manchester due to the economic crisis in their home country.
The aim of this sampling was to obtain a better perspective of the viewpoints of each
participant, which in turn has allowed the author to explore the causes of the economic
crisis. The interviews were recorded and fully transcribed in both Spanish and English for
its interpretation in a logical manner.
The results show that crisis has highlighted weaknesses in Spain's economy, such as any
risk falling not on capital but on the public. The Spanish people are suffering the
consequences of a neoliberal system based on cuts that do not offer a way out of the crisis.
On the contrary, it is deepening. The austerity measures are intended to ensure that large
financial companies collect the debt that Spain owes them. Globalisation paradoxically
promotes the mobility of capital and goods whilst hindering human mobility. The study
demonstrates that ending the crisis means improving Spanish competitiveness, which
requires a larger pool of human capital; education is therefore the fulcrum of improvements
in Spain, followed by innovation and improving both the banking system and the labour
market.
iii
Acknowledgements The reason I embarked on this dissertation was to explore the economic and institutional
crises affecting Spain. As a Spaniard myself, this is a subject that I am really interested in.
I would like to thank my supervisors, Prof Dr. Hamed El-Said and Dr. Nuran Fraser, for
their valuable knowledge and expertise, and for their advice and encouragement in each
phase of this research.
Thanks to those who have participated in this project through interviews: thanks for your
clarity and honesty. In particular I would like to thank the United Left representative Tania
Sánchez Melero, Prof Dr. Juan Torres López and Dr. Stuart Barret for sharing your
knowledge with me; without your help, this dissertation would not have been possible.
Warm thanks go to my English tutor for the past four years, Andy Porter; thank you for your
extreme patience and for being such a great teacher. Four years ago, who would have
thought I would be able to write a Masters dissertation in English?
Thanks to all my close friends for their support and especially for taking care of me during
the surgery I underwent this summer due to my health problems. Finally, a special mention
to my family for supporting me from day one to the last.
iv
Table of Contents
Declaration ............................................................................................................... i
Abstract ................................................................................................................... ii
Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... iii
List of Tables and Figures .................................................................................... vi
List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................ vii
Chapter I .................................................................................................................. 1
Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction to the topic ............................................................................................. 2 1.1. The role of subprime mortgage .............................................................................. 2 1.2. Aim and Objectives .................................................................................................. 4
1.2.3. Research objectives ........................................................................................... 4 1.3. Structure of the dissertation ................................................................................... 4
Chapter II ................................................................................................................. 6
Literature Review .................................................................................................... 6 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 7 2.1. Spain, a country into the abyss .............................................................................. 7
2.3. Examining the impact of EU reforms on Spain ........................................... 10 2.3.1. Interpreting Keynes’s theories .......................................................................... 12
2.4. The challenge the Spanish government faces to end the crisis ....................... 13 2.4.1. Innovation as a driver of economic growth ....................................................... 15 2.4.2. Labour Market ................................................................................................... 16 2.4.3. Banking System ................................................................................................ 18
2.5. Conceptual Framework ......................................................................................... 20 2.6. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 22
Chapter III .............................................................................................................. 23
Methodology .......................................................................................................... 23 3. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 24 3.1. Research Approach ............................................................................................... 24
3.1.1 Research Method Approaches: Deductive and Inductive .................................. 27 3.2. Research Design .................................................................................................... 28 3.3. Research Strategy ................................................................................................. 29 3.4. Research Methods ................................................................................................. 30
3.4.1. Interviews Design .............................................................................................. 32 3.4.2. Focus Group ..................................................................................................... 32
3.5. Sampling ................................................................................................................. 33 3.6. Data Analysis ......................................................................................................... 36 3.7. Ethics ...................................................................................................................... 38
v
3.8. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 38 Chapter IV .............................................................................................................. 39
Findings and Discussion ...................................................................................... 39 4. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 40 4.1. The catalysts of the Spanish economic crisis .................................................... 40 4.2. The austerity measures taken by the EU ............................................................. 43 4.3. Spain’s competitiveness ....................................................................................... 44
4.3.1. Productivity ....................................................................................................... 45 4.3.2. Labour Market ................................................................................................... 46 4.3.3. Education .......................................................................................................... 47 4.3.4. Innovation system ............................................................................................. 48 4.3.5. Banking system ................................................................................................. 49
4.4. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 50 Chapter V ............................................................................................................... 51
Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................. 51 5. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 52 5.1. The triggers of the Spanish economic crisis ...................................................... 52 5.2. Austerity measures, or financial recovery through Keynes’s theories ............ 53 5.3. Ending the crisis by improving Spain’s competitiveness ................................. 54 5.4. Recommendations ................................................................................................. 55 5.5. Limitations .............................................................................................................. 58 5.6. Scope for further research .................................................................................... 58
References ............................................................................................................. 60 Appendices ............................................................................................................ 66
Appendix A ............................................................................................................ 67 Royal Decree Law 3/2012 ............................................................................................. 67
Appendix B ............................................................................................................ 69 Interviews – English version ........................................................................................ 69 Interviews – Spanish version ..................................................................................... 113
vi
List of Tables and Figures Figure 1: Economically Active Population, Unemployment rate (%) in Spain...……….8
Figure 2: Spanish Household Debt – 2003/2012……………………………………………..9
Table 1: The four main objectives of the labour reform…………………………………..17
Figure 3: Conceptual Framework……………………………………………………………..20
Figure 4: Research Onion………………………………………………………………………24
Figure 5: Methodological levels.…………..………………………………………………….26
Table 2: Research Methods……………………………………………………………………31
Table 3: Focus group advantages and disadvantages…………………………………...33
Table 4: Interview Participants Background…………………..…………………………...34
Table 5: The process of qualitative data analysis…………………………………………37
Table 6: Recommendations…………………………………………………………………...55
vii
List of Abbreviations ECB: European Central Bank
EU: European Union
EU27: European Union of 27 Member States
FDI: Foreign Direct Investment
GDP: Gross Domestic Product
IMF: International Monetary Fund
INE: National Statistics Institute
IU: United Left
MBS: Mortgage Backed Securities
NINJA: No Income, No Job and No Asset
OECD: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
PP: People’s Party
PSOE: Spanish Socialist Worker’s Party
R&D: Research Development
SICAV: Investment Company with Variable Capital
SMEs: Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises
WEF: World Economic Forum
viii
‘There are two kinds of economists: those who work to make the rich richer and those who
work to make the poor less poor’.
José Luis Sampedro, 1/2/1917 - 8/4/2013.
2
1. Introduction to the topic Navarro et al. (2011) argues that the first thing firms, organisations, nations and
institutions should do to solve any issue is to discover the real causes of the situation, just
as any doctor should make an accurate diagnosis of his patient if he wishes to treat him
properly.
During the last century there have been many different economic crises, such as
the Wall Street Crash of October 1929. This crisis ended a long period of speculation in the
U.S. market. From 1924 until 1928, the country's economy was based on the dangerous
credit mechanism used in financial speculation; this focused on cheap monetary practices,
where credit was easily available. Investors borrowed in order to invest in the market
through the buying and selling of stocks, which caused a rise in companies' quotations,
providing great returns that allowed investors to quickly repay the borrowed money and
pocket a substantial profit.
Over the years, banks have speculated with their customers’ money; and through a
series of financial speculations, many banks bankrupted themselves and lost the savings of
millions of people. This catastrophe was felt in virtually all economies worldwide, and was
one of the causes of World War II (Calomiris, 1993).
1.1. The role of subprime mortgage It was thought that mankind had learned its lesson from the Great Depression;
however it seems there are many lessons left to learn. The current global financial crisis
began in a similar way to the Crash of 1929; capitalism created a system which made poor
people believe they were rich and thus take on mortgages they could not actually pay off.
This forms the backbone of the current crisis. During the Nineties, interest rates in
the United States fell, which is why the banks created two types of mortgage - prime (good)
and subprime (bad) - to achieve higher yields. The government accepted the existence of
these packages; despite knowing they carry a high risk. However, due to these types of
mortgage, American banks increased demand for mortgages. In this period, the global
economy was quite healthy and people were confident enough to arrange mortgages
(Trehan, 2007).
Torres (2010) argues that subprime mortgages were high risk because they were
granted to people with economic problems. The banks lent money at a higher interest rate
than for prime mortgage loans. These subprime mortgages became known as NINJA – ‘No
3
Income, No Job and No Asset’ (loans made without declaration of income from the
borrower). These mortgages attracted borrowers who could not gain credit elsewhere.
Banks began to give out so many mortgages that they lost their liquidity, meaning they had
to resort to the titling of assets by selling the role of mortgages. These assets were sold as
packages known as Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) to financial institutions who, as
payment, gave liquid money to the banks, so they could continue providing mortgages to
the NINJA.
This fuelled a property bubble in Spain. To know whether these packages were
good or bad, it was necessary to refer to the credit rating agencies - private entities
responsible for assessing the quality of these bonds. If the products were rated as low
quality it was because there was a risk of default - they would receive a low rating, as must
have been the case with subprime mortgages. However, because the main objective was
to facilitate the real estate sector, the credit rating agencies had no qualms about giving the
highest rating to the MBS packages, which received AAA quality (the highest rating).
According to Ashcraft and Schuermann (2008), during 2006 subprime mortgage holders
were worth $448.6 billion. The investment funds which bought those bonds in turn sold
them to other funds and then on to others, so that they spread all over the international
banking system.
Dethier and Morrill (2012) state that since the early ´90's housing prices increased,
until 2006, when they reached their peak. Since then prices in Spain have fallen
dramatically as millions of workers have become unemployed and unable to pay their
mortgages.
When the housing bubble burst, these MBS bonds started to depreciate in value on
the marketplace. Dierckxsens (2008) contends that house prices fell by 9% in 2007; it is
estimated that, at that time, there were 8.8 million mortgage holders (amongst a population
of 52 million) who had housing loans higher than the current value of their homes.
In addition, the financial crisis has not only reduced employment in the building
industry but has also had a dramatic impact on other sectors. This led banks to fight
against defaults at the beginning of 2007; as a result many banks, such as Lehman
Brothers, American Home Mortgage, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch and others went bankrupt
(Bordo, 2008).
4
1.2. Aim and Objectives The major motivation for the researcher is the devastating effect the crisis is having
on Spanish society. In recent years unemployment has grown to 6,200,000 (INE, 2013b) –
in particular, youth unemployment has reached over 55%. This has caused many people to
fall into debt, and led thousands to leave the country seeking work; this is having a
devastating effect on families across Spain.
The main aim of this project is to generate an appropriate methodology to identify
the causes that have pushed Spain into this situation. In addition, it will make a critical
analysis of the factors that have caused the crisis in the country. Finally, it will seek
alternatives that could help the country end the difficult situation, through improvement of
the most important pillars of the economy of any nation - improvement of competitiveness
through innovation, education, productivity, the labour market and the banking system.
1.2.3. Research objectives
1) To evaluate the main causes of the current economic crisis in Spain
2) To analyse the effectiveness of new policy reforms implemented by the European
Community and the Spanish government, and whether they provide a solution to
the crisis
3) To examine the Spanish crisis in the context of economic policies and theories
4) To examine how Spain could recover from the crisis by becoming more competitive
5) To explore the four main pillars that Spain should improve in order to be more
competitive
1.3. Structure of the dissertation In addition to this introductory chapter, this research consists of four chapters, the
contents of which are briefly outlined below.
Chapter II Literature Review
This chapter presents a critical analysis of the Spanish economic crisis, examining
the real reasons Spain is in the abyss. It offers some suggestions to help overcome the dire
economic situation by improving Spain's competitiveness.
Chapter III Methodology
This chapter is based on the methods chosen to gather the data to effectively
explore the topic and achieve the objectives set by the author. Thus it suggests qualitative
research based on six in-depth interviews, specifying the sampling strategy to follow.
5
Chapter IV Findings and Discussion
This chapter focuses on presenting the results generated after the analysis of both
literature and primary data, looking for correlations and contrasts between the findings
through logical and thoughtful interpretation.
Chapter V Conclusions and Recommendations
The last chapter presents the conclusions obtained through empirical research and
raises recommendations for the future. Also, it suggests scopes of research to follow in the
future.
7
2. Introduction
The principal aim of this literature review is to critically analyse the causes of the
current economic crisis in Spain. Secondly, to conduct a radiograph of the debt that the
country has amassed in recent years due to poor public administration. The international
financial crisis and its impact on the Spanish economy has exposed the weaknesses of
Spain´s growth pattern and the extent of the country´s problems with productivity and
competitiveness. Moreover, the literature suggests alternative approaches to overcome the
crisis, through improving the main pillars of competitiveness such as: labour market,
education, banking and innovation. Finally, this chapter concludes with a conceptual
framework for the research design.
2.1. Spain, a country into the abyss The Spanish economic crisis first took hold in 2008, but it was not until a year later
that it manifested with such harshness. According to the National Statistics Institute (INE,
2013a), unemployment is the most visible consequence of the recession, reaching
6,202,700 million unemployed in 2013 - equivalent to 27.16% of the active population
(which alongside Greece is the highest unemployment rate in Europe), an increase of
563,200 versus the previous year.
Unemployment has affected everyone. Figure 1 below illustrates the increase in
Spain´s recent unemployment rates. Undoubtedly, the most troubling figure is youth
unemployment, which, according to this year´s data (2013), stands at 55.9% - the second
highest in the EU27, behind only Greece (59.1%). Both countries are well above the EU27
average of 23.5%; the data is more staggering when compared to Austria and Germany,
the European countries with the lowest youth unemployment rates, each with a figure of
only 7.6% ( European Commission, 2013).
Due to rising youth unemployment in the last five years, more than 300,000
Spaniards aged 25 to 35 (the majority with higher education qualifications) have emigrated
to search for work. This loss of human capital could have a long-term negative spill-over.
The main beneficiaries of this ‘brain drain’ are countries like Germany, France, the United
Kingdom, Norway and Argentina, as they provide better job opportunities (Valera, 2012).
It is important to underline that the average unemployment rate in the Euro area has
also increased in recent years, owing to the heavy tensions in sovereign debt markets
8
around Europe. In March 2013, unemployment in the Euro area was 12.1% (European
Commission, 2013).
Figure 1: Economically Active Population, Unemployment rate (%) in Spain
Source: adapted from INE, 2013b.
The Bank of Spain (cited in Jiménez and Mars 2013) states that in recent years
Spain has accumulated a public administration debt of 84% of the country´s Gross
Domestic Product (GDP). In 2012 the GDP was €1,050 billion - translating to a Spanish
debt of €882 billion in 2012. This has increased over recent years - an increase of €400
million more debt every day. Never in the history of the Spanish economy has there been
such an increase in such a short amount of time.
Household debt has also grown significantly over the last ten years, as shown in
Figure 2. Gay de Liébana (2012) writes that Spanish household debt in 2012 was €855
billion. This debt has been caused by the property bubble´s boom years, where credit
agencies encouraged families to borrow.
It is also crucial to note the financial sector´s debt, which is around €1,200 billion, as
well as debt held by non-financial firms of €1,247 billion. These numbers indicate that
19.80% 20.30% 21.30%
20.30% 21.50%
22.90% 24.40% 24.60% 25%
26% 27.16%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
Unemployment rate (%)
2010/Q3 2010/Q4 2011/Q1 2011/Q2 2011/Q3 2011/Q4 2012/Q1 2012/Q2 2012/Q3 2012/Q4 2013/Q1
9
Spain's gross debt in 2012 was €4,184 billion - four times the country's GDP. As a result,
for every Euro that Spain produces, it accrues debt of more than four Euros.
Figure 2: Spanish Household Debt – 2003/2012
Source: adapted from Gay de Liébana, 2012 p.48.
The situation in the country is unsustainable. One principal cause is the housing
bubble, where the Spanish government promoted unsustainable economic growth based
on the construction sector. During the construction boom, the number of houses built in
Spain rose almost 30% (around 750,000 houses per year) between 1998 and 2007. This
accounted for an average of 13.3% of total employment, far higher than in countries such
as Germany (6.7%) and the UK (8.5%). Moreover, the revaluation of houses in Spain
during the real estate boom was 191%, the second highest figure amongst OECD
(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries. Unfortunately, the
construction cow could not be milked forever.
A principal cause of the housing bubble was the introduction of the Land Law in
2008. The People´s Party (PP) government believed that by providing more land, housing
prices would fall. In fact, the opposite occurred - speculators started to buy and build
houses, expecting that prices would increase for a long time (Arellano and Bentolila, 2009).
451.1
541.9
653.5
780.7
876.6 912.8 906.6 902.1
870.9 855.8
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
Household Debt (in billion of euros)
10
Another factor behind the housing bubble was the currency exchange in 2002,
which took Spain from the peseta (old currency) to the Euro. This had an inflationary effect
- house prices doubled in just a few years, whilst wages increased only slightly in contrast
with other Eurozone countries, contributing to massive Spanish household debt (Gay de
Liébana, 2012).
As a result, there have been more than 400,000 evictions, affecting thousands of
families. Tragically too, there have been waves of suicides just days after people have
been evicted, or mere hours before their eviction date (Buck, 2013). This system of
economic development contradicts the definition of sustainable development according to
the Brundtland Commission (in 1987, cited in Porrit 2007 p.33), which recommends
'development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs'.
The Spanish Constitution, ratified in 1978, sets out essential principles for the
country and the rights of its citizens. Article 35 states that ‘All Spaniards have the duty to
work and the right to employment, to free choice of profession or trade, to advancement
through their work, and to sufficient remuneration for the satisfaction of their needs and
those of their families.’ This is in stark contrast to the current 27.16% unemployment rate.
Article 47 too emphasises that 'All Spaniards are entitled to enjoy decent and adequate
housing. The public authorities shall promote the necessary conditions and shall establish
appropriate standards in order to make this right effective, regulating land use in
accordance with the general interest in order to prevent speculation’. Again, this compares
to the 400,000 evictions. There is widespread dissatisfaction and anger in Spanish society
at the failure of the current administration to provide what is promised in the Constitution.
(The Spanish Constitution, 1978).
2.3. Examining the impact of EU reforms on Spain
Anguita (2012) states that the seeds of the Spanish crisis were sown 21 years ago,
with Spain´s entry into the European Union. By signing the Maastricht Treaty in 1992,
Spain accepted the treaty’s strengths but also its weaknesses - for instance, the EU
created a single currency (Euro) incorporating countries who are diverse both economically
and socially; however the EU does not share a common budget or common fiscal policy.
11
Before entering the Euro, whenever Spain needed money it always went to Spain’s
Central Bank and borrowed at an interest rate of 1%. However Maastricht bans Eurozone
countries from using their central banks, so whenever the government needs money for
roads, schools, hospitals, etc., it now has to borrow from private banks, at an interest rate
of at least 5%. This is why public debt constitutes such a large part of public spending. In
2012, Spain paid €30 billion to private banks in interest alone (Gay de Liébana 2012).
Lord Gonzalez (2012), Prime Minister of Spain at the time when the Treaty was
signed, admits that mistakes were made. He says that Eurozone countries waived their
sovereign currencies to adopt the Euro as a single currency for all, and created a European
Central Bank (ECB) with statutory powers to develop monetary policy and inflation. But
when the single currency was decided, the Euro and the ECB did not sufficiently address
the challenge of how to manage monetary union with divergent fiscal and economic
policies. When negotiating the Treaty, Economic and Monetary Union were considered, but
only a monetary union has been developed, accompanied by a Stability and Growth Pact
that was thought sufficient to guarantee the proper functioning of the single currency.
Fink and Salvatore (1999) warned that the Euro could cause problems, as an ECB
would want to maintain tight monetary conditions to make the Euro stronger than the dollar.
They also claimed there could be an increase in economic inequality between northern
European and southern European countries, arguing that the southern Europe would
become relatively poor and lose human capital with the emigration of better trained
professionals attracted to the higher salaries and better career opportunities offered
elsewhere in the EU.
Under the Treaty, guidelines limit public debt to a maximum of 60% of GDP; Spain’s
public debt however currently accounts for 84% of GDP. In addition, the guidelines specify
that the national deficit could not exceed 3% of GDP – however in 2013, Spain´s deficit
was 7.2% (6.7% excluding support to banks). Forecasts for the coming years are more
favourable - it is expected to reduce to 5.8% in 2014 owing to production growth and
structural adjustment (Gay de Liébana 2012; European Commission 2012; ECB 2014).
These pacts to limit public deficit and public debt led to the Spanish government
making cuts of €27 billion in the state budget for 2013 (almost equivalent to the money that
Spain pays to the private banks for the interest rate of their public debt). These austerity
measures are promoted by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), ECB and EU. The
public administrations most affected are health and education, with a freeze and reduction
12
of public sector salaries, as well as an increase in tax to meet public deficit targets agreed
with the EU (BBC, 2012).
The Euro is overvalued for Spain, given that productivity levels in Spain are lower
than in the northern European countries. Belonging to the Eurozone has seen the
disappearance of internal monetary devaluation, which had frequently been successful to
overcome economic crises (Weisbrot and Montecino, 2010).
2.3.1. Interpreting Keynes’s theories
Keynes’ (cited in Mattick, 1971) advocated that to minimise unemployment, it is
necessary to activate the consumer through lower taxes, increase public spending and
public employment, and promote exports through monetary devaluation, thus increasing
the nation’s global competitiveness. Demand will increase and unemployment will be
reduced. In addition, Stiglitz (2012) argues that the austerity measures have serious
consequences in the long-term. Whether or not the Euro survives this crisis, it will do so
with a high rate of unemployment, especially in southern European countries.
Spain’s most valuable asset is its human capital, which is being eroded by high
unemployment levels. A country with large numbers of unemployed does not create wealth;
a firm can run without managers, but without workers there is no wealth because what is
created is known as surplus value (Smith 1776; Marx 1978; Ricardo 1911).
Moreover, Keynes argues that, in times of crisis, it is important to understand the
main priorities of the country's economy, in order to reduce unemployment (which is the
biggest issue in Spain) or to fight against deficit and public debt (priorities of the EU).
Keynesian theories might be the best framework for dealing with recessions and
depressions - these theories emphasise that, in order to end an economic crisis, it is
essential to: reduce taxes, to encourage consumer spending and drive demand; lower
interest rates to encourage businesses to invest more; increase public spending to create
jobs; and encourage exports by lowering the exchange rate through currency devalue.
Keynes wanted to fix capitalism, not replace it. However, he did not believe in free markets
without active government control and intervention to overcome periods of crisis (Krugman
2009; Young 1987). However, it is has been said that Keynes theories do not address
stagflation, and stagflation may be better addressed through the theories of Milton
Friedman.
13
The liberal model of Friedman maintains that good fiscal policy means public
spending is equal to government revenue, and that there should be a balanced budget.
This neoliberal system is against public deficit and believes that the only policy that
government should take is a monetary policy - one that handles interest rates and
promotes a free market policy. Neoliberals believe in microeconomics through related
production spending and increased competitiveness through new technologies.
Friedman states that economic growth depends on factors such as institutions and
the organisation of the economy, but never on monetary impulses (Friedman, 1980). The
neoclassical viewpoint considers that government intervention is bad and market
liberalisation is a more desirable approach, however, this view has arguably failed as it
does not sufficiently support institutions and help them to thrive. It is important to
acknowledge that institutions matter; they not only provide incentives but also structure
actions that individuals respond to. Institutions affect the capacity of firms to interact and
therefore affect the relative transaction and coordination costs of production and innovation
(Mudambi and Navarra 2003). According to (North 1990 p.3) ‘Institutions are the rules of
the game in society or, more formally, the humanly devised constraints that shape human
interaction’.
Knack and Keefer (1997) argue that governments that gain the confidence of their
own citizens, plus of international markets attract greater Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).
Additionally, firms have stronger incentives to innovate and accumulate physical capital,
stimulating employment. Therefore, the major role of institutions in a society is to reduce
uncertainty by establishing a stable structure and build confidence.
2.4. The challenge the Spanish government faces to end the crisis Spain needs to improve its competitiveness to end the current crisis. The World
Economic Forum (WEF, 2013 p.4) defines competitiveness as 'the set of institutions,
policies, and factors that determine the level of productivity of a country'. Spain has a
delicate macroeconomic climate with tremendous difficulties in curbing its public deficit, and
was ranked 135th position in terms of public deficit.
The Spanish banking system is rated 109th because some Spanish banks have
been rescued by the government, generating a lack of confidence in the global financial
market. It has also led to serious difficulties for firms in accessing finance; Spain also has
severe problems with other areas, pillars which are vital for the economy, such as:
14
productivity (ranked 133rd), labour market (123rd), innovation (44th) and the educational
system (81st).
Porter (1990) maintains that competitiveness is determined by how productively a
nation uses its resources; the quality and uniqueness of its goods and services; and the
efficiency with which they are produced. In this context, Porter´s conceptualisation of
competitiveness refers to a country´s ability to provide great prosperity for its citizens, plus
how effectively a country uses its human, natural and capital resources. A firm is the
platform where these resources are combined to produce goods and services in an efficient
and productive way. It is also necessary to have superior resources and achieve efficiency
to improve productivity and competitiveness. This happens when firms use the minimum
level of resources for a particular operation, or obtain maximum results from a given level
of resources. The company also seeks the possibility of using existing resources more
profitably (Peteraf 2007; Grant 2005).
Adam Smith (1776) analyses the absolute advantage and division of labour,
essential theories for productivity. Smith wrote that the production of a product for
exchange always requires human labour, and that some countries could reach an absolute
advantage through the skills of their workers or the quality of their natural resources.
A clear example is the tourism sector in Spain: thanks to its natural resources and
workers’ specialisation in this sector, Spain has a competitive advantage. In 2012 there
were 57.7 million tourists in Spain, amassing a revenue of €55.5 billion (Institute of Tourism
Studies, 2013). Porter (1985) states that this competitive advantage has normally been
gained by offering consumers better value; by offering lower prices than competitors or by
providing greater benefits and services that justify higher prices. Smith (1776) emphasises
that each country should specialise in production and export to make production processes
more efficient: in other words, to reduce the number of hours spent. However, according to
Smith, a nation is richer than other nations because productivity in its factories and
enterprises is more advanced than amongst its competitors.
Except for the tourist sector, Spain has experienced the weakest growth in labour
productivity compared to other OECD countries (OECD, 2012b). The evolution of
productivity in Spain since 1995 has been slow and negative. During the real estate boom,
many investment projects based their profitability on short-term expectations of asset
revaluation and few on productivity. Spain needs to improve its productivity as it enhances
the income per capita of a nation, yet it requires the same number of workers to produce
15
more goods and services that are valued by the market (García, 2011). Recent data from
the OECD (2012a) shows that although Spain is one of the least productive countries,
Spanish workers work more hours per year, an average of 1,690 in 2011, higher than
French (1,476), German (1,413) and British (1,625) workers.
At just €728 per month, the minimum wage in Spain is below other EU countries: for
example, in Luxembourg it is (€1,357), in Ireland (€1,462), the Netherlands (€1,357),
France (€1,336) and the UK (€1,148), (Anguita, 2012). Hence productivity establishes
wages, gains returns on capital and natural resources and, by extension, improves the
standard of living in the country. Firms are more productive when the business environment
in which they operate is positive (Porter, 1990).
2.4.1. Innovation as a driver of economic growth
The crisis has highlighted the shortcomings of the Spanish production model.
Spending on research and development (R&D) in Spain was 14,588 million Euros in 2010,
1.39% of Spanish GDP; this is low compared to the EU27 average, which is over 2% of
GDP (Cotec, 2012). Additionally, the Spanish government last year announced a cut in
science funding of more than 25% - this decision will have negative consequences on the
Spanish economy in the future (Pain, 2012). The government has been forced to rethink its
actions in order to achieve future sustainable growth and job creation. The introduction of
the new law on Science, Technology and Innovation in 2012 is an important step forward
for the progressive coordination and internationalisation of the Spanish innovation system.
However, Drucker (1985) notes that innovations emerge from ‘bright ideas’, which
are often vague and uncertain; entrepreneurs face high risks when trying to implement
them. Drucker believes innovative entrepreneurs should put aside their brilliant ideas and
focus instead on analysing the fields that can lead to innovations. That said, recent
research shows that 71% of ideas come from new employees, 21% by coincidence and
just 8% from R&D. Consequently it is essential that all citizens can generate new ideas
through a sound education system, which supports development and implementation of
new ideas (Martin, 2011).
Spain´s educational system has one of the largest drop-out rates in Europe, with
28.4% of students not obtaining the compulsory secondary education (ESO) qualification.
One major cause is the wide range of highly paid no-qualification job opportunities created
during the construction boom. According to data, the new cuts in education amount to
62.5%; it is claimed that consequently science contracts fell by 43%, R&D by 25.52%,
16
scholarships and study grants by 11.6 % and Erasmus programmes by 41.4%. Moreover,
the increase in tuition fees could lead to a university drop-out of around 20% next year due
to a lack of financial resources for some students. This would signify a move for Spain
away from the OECD average investment of GDP in scholarships (0.11% of GDP
compared to 0.29% of the OECD average) (Mengual, 2012).
Human capital and innovation are essential to economic productivity and
competitiveness (Cotec, 2012). Porter (1990) states that the mere availability of natural
resources is no longer a competitive advantage. In the knowledge era, advantage is
generated by innovation and creativity, which requires a large investment in human capital,
training, research and development. Faced with new realities, what makes a country,
region or firm prosperous is productivity and innovation - the ability to make more efficient
use of a workforce. Dynamic capabilities become determinants of innovation, and the firm
should strive to maintain its competitive advantage. Dynamic capabilities are not in
themselves a competitive advantage, but they facilitate the construction of that competitive
advantage. In other words, dynamic capabilities are a crucial but not sufficient criterion for
building sustainable advantages. However they provide new practices, systems and
procedures which are incorporated into the repertoire of the organisation (Zollo and Winter
2002; Barney 1991; Eisenhardt and Martin 2000).
Schumpeter’s vision of innovative activity as the main driver of economic growth is
part of his theory of 'creative destruction', which gives a key role to entrepreneurs who use
innovation and technological advances as a vehicle for economic development. He viewed
recessions as healthy, part of the economy’s amendment to change. According to his
theory, a business cannot be recognised an enterprise just because it is operational;
entrepreneurs must also create innovative products. Schumpeter's theory reflects the fact
that economic cycles are natural in the world of capitalism – they come from waves of
innovation, new products and new enterprises. The crises prolong the time it takes for
inventions to become new products or innovations. With the new growth cycle, companies
and entrepreneurs who have not innovated disappear from the market. Schumpeter
thought that the main drivers of capitalism do not proceed from population growth or
accumulation of capital – they come from entrepreneurship (Schumpeter, 1934).
2.4.2. Labour Market
According to OECD (2012b), the critical situation in Spain has exposed the
weaknesses of the Spanish labour model. Therefore, the Spanish government is facing the
challenge of increased competitiveness and productivity through new labour reform.
17
In recent years, the Spanish economy has seen significantly weaker productivity
growth than other OECD countries. The government believes that reforming employment
protection legislation is key to motivating firms to hire more employees with permanent
contracts; under the previous law, labour market costs for layoffs of workers with undefined
contracts was extremely high (compensation of 44 days per year worked, with a maximum
of 42 months) compared with temporary contracts, which led the number of temporary
contracts to rise to 25% - higher than the EU27 average of 14% (BOE, 2012). Besides,
high protection for employees with permanent contracts can reduce the responsiveness of
wages to labour market conditions and make it difficult to integrate young people into the
labour market. Finally, it could harm productivity by reducing the mobility of workers with
permanent contracts and incentives for individuals and businesses to invest in training for
temporary jobs (OECD, 2012b).
The new labour reform includes the Royal Decree Law 3/2012 (the full Law is
illustrated in Appendix A), which aims to address the high rate of unemployment (27.16%)
in Spain as well as establishing a clear framework that will contribute to the effective
management of labour relations and facilitate job creation. It purports to provide a better
balance of internal and external flexibility between the regulation of permanent contracts
and temporary.
Table 1: The four main objectives of the labour reform.
1. ‘Collective bargaining and internal firm flexibility. Pre-eminence of agreements
reached at the firm level. Limited validity of agreements in the absence of a new
one once they have expired (ultra activity). Facilities for the employer to adapt
working conditions, including working hours and salary.
2. Favouring the effectiveness of the labour market and reducing duality.
Reduction of the compensation for dismissals. Causes for economic dismissals
have been clarified. Creation of a new permanent contract.
3. Favouring permanent contracts. New contract for entrepreneurs with a
probation period of one year.
18
4. Favouring workers’ employability. Temporary Employment Firms are allowed to
act as private employment agencies. Encouragement of permanent training of
workers and vocational training’.
Source: Ministry of Economic and Competitiveness, 2012 p.1.
Before the reform, the unemployment rate was 23% (5.3 million); currently it is
27.16% (6.2 million). If the main objective of the new labour market reform was to create
jobs, the data suggests it is failing. Perhaps the reform should have strengthened internal
flexibility, such as salaries, working hours and work schedule, etc. Without a radical
advance in flexibility in terms of dismissal, employers receive a message that it is easier to
reduce the number of employees.
Labour reform has also negatively impacted on youth unemployment. Before the
reform, youth unemployment stood at 48.6% - in July 2013 it is 56.5%. During this period
wages have also dropped significantly. The government should consider more labour
market reform for better results (Gutierrez, 2013).
The IMF (2013) emphasises that Spain has historically never created net
employment when the economy did not grow more than 2%. This growth figure is not
expected in the medium-term, so the IMF believes that adjusting wages could reduce the
number of lay-offs in future years and persuade employers to hire and invest more. This
would boost demand and increase the country's competitiveness.
According to the authorities, the labour reform requires a long period of time to
deliver results - authorities believe that it may be working but the recovery is slow. The IMF
maintains that the new reform is having a positive effect but recommends further labour
reform to increase competitiveness and reduce unemployment, through policies that
reduce the cost (including tax cost) of hiring groups such as youth and low-skilled workers.
Labour reform should be supplemented by faster progress in enhancing competition and
the business environment. These reduced labour costs increase the country
competitiveness; exports of goods grew by 2.9% in the last year, which refers to €234
billion per year from international business (Benoit and Ichikura, 2014).
2.4.3. Banking System
Torres (2010) emphasises that large companies do not need lots of financial help
because they have their own funds, whereas small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) -
which constitute 99% of Spanish firms - depend entirely on loans to finance their activities;
19
unlike large companies, SMEs do not have the liquidity or ability to issue shares or financial
instruments from which they could receive funds. Nowadays more than 87% of SMEs admit
to having trouble accessing credit. Moreover, Gay de Liébana (2012) maintains that SMEs
are where more employment is generated. They will take Spain out of its crisis.
The impact on access to credit is severely damaging the economy; the authorities
have to regain credit. Authorities have bailed out the banks to the tune of €100 billion but it
not been enough to revive the credit that the Spanish economy needs; it has only helped to
conceal the weaknesses at the heart of the Spanish financial system (Torres, 2010). The
Spanish bank borrows money at an interest rate of 1% from the ECB and buys the public
debt of countries in crisis at an interest rate of at least 5%, with the assurance that the debt
will be paid without any risk, instead of supporting SMEs by providing credit at low interest
rates (Gay de Liébana, 2012).
The Spanish government is pressing the EU to facilitate financing SMEs through
three proposals. The most conservative proposal is €10.4 billion from the EU budget for
2014-2020, which will benefit more than 580,000 SMEs in Europe and create a significant
number of jobs (Informacion, 2013). Recently Sánchez (2013) confirms that Germany has
signed an agreement to bail out Spanish SMEs, aiming to provide liquidity to Spanish
SMEs. Spain will collect up to €2.4 billion over the next few years, as the agreement comes
into force from late 2013. This funding is expected to have a positive effect on short-term
unemployment data and training places for young Spaniards.
Weak banks have been strengthened and recapitalised by a review of the assets,
an independent stress test exercise and a new restructuring plan. In addition, capital
augmentation has been achieved through burden-sharing with subordinated debt and the
transfer of assets and loans to a newly incorporated asset management company
(SAREB), and though a new draft law. The supervision of the Bank of Spain has also
strengthened the banking system. This is vital to ensure the solvency of financial
institutions and public entities. Additionally, the Spanish financial system is now controlled
by the EU, which ensures that the money is being well spent. By contrast, banks have
tightened lending standards for a given creditworthiness and companies’ access to credit
remains the most urgent problem in Spain. The increase in lending rates seems
inconsistent with a pure demand shock. There may also be disruption of credit relationships
as many banks helped by the state downscale operations as part of their restructuring
plans (IMF, 2013).
20
2.5. Conceptual Framework
The literature review has provided the author with a theoretical construction
framework with which to find the most recent and relevant data for this project. This
literature has given a better picture of the fundamentals influencing the Spanish economy
in the last decade, and established which pillars are critical for Spain´s competitiveness. It
also has helped compose an appropriate conceptual framework, as well as being a useful
research tool for this study and thus a foundation for analysing the literature. The
conceptual framework (Figure 3) plans to explore the theoretical basis of the factors related
to the Spanish economic crisis that began in 2008 and the poor competitiveness of the
country. The conceptual framework examines the causes of the economic crisis, which
could be the housing bubble and subprime mortgages, and explores economic policy and
theories that could provide a solution to the crisis, as well as how the country could
increase its competitiveness. In reviewing the literature, these concepts could be the
reasons that the Spanish economy is in crisis.
Figure 3: Conceptual Framework
Source: author´s own
21
Moreover, this conceptual framework has allowed to the author to select a
qualitative research method of in-depth interviews to examine the causes of Spanish
economic crisis and how the country could become more competitive, according to the
perspectives of the interviewees. This literature review can be used as a basis for
discussion with participants (Jabareen, 2009).
One of the main causes of Spain´s economic crisis was the bursting of the housing
bubble in 2008. The Spanish government´s strategy was to focus on the construction
sector to rebuild the economy, without foreseeing the risk characterised by uncontrolled
expansion, ,dragging citizens into debt with little thought for future consequences (Gay de
Liébana, 2012).
Secondly, although it is usual to state that the economic crisis erupted in 2007 with
the announcement that major U.S. banks had lost huge amounts of money, the origins of
the crisis came years ago, when subprime mortgages were considered high risk products.
Uncertainty and fear spread in stock markets all over the world, illustrating that it was not
only a subprime mortgage crisis but a global economic crisis (Torres, 2010).
Moreover, the author is interested to explore whether the austerity measures and
economic policies of the IMF and the Spanish government are alleviating or worsening the
crisis, and to explore how economic theories, such as the Keynesian model, could
stimulate recovery.
Finally, Spain has one of the lowest levels of productivity and competitiveness in the
EU; one of the most comprehensive efforts to measure the international competitiveness of
nations has been conducted by the WEF (2013), which bases its analyses on the Global
Competitiveness Index (GCI). This is a useful tool used by the researcher to analysis the
Spanish competitiveness. The WEF (2013) suggests that there are 12 key pillars which can
be used in order to measure the competitiveness of a nation and the author focuses on
four: innovation, the education system, banking and the labour market, plus Porter´s
theories of competitiveness that could help Spain recover.
22
2.6. Conclusion
This chapter contends that the Spanish economy has been negatively affected by
poor public administration during the housing bubble and lack of economic
competitiveness, which has over the last decade led the country into one of the darkest
financial periods in its history. Spain has the highest unemployment rate in the EU.
Austerity measures imposed by the EU are not having positive results; it can even be said
austerity is worsening the situation in the country. The best way out of the crisis is by
improving the country's competitiveness - a competitive nation creates wealth and
economic growth, enabling businesses to thrive, and improving the living standards of its
citizens. In summary, to increase competitiveness, Spain should improve its basic pillars -
education, banking, innovation, productivity and the labour market.
24
3. Introduction To meet the objectives of this study, a suitable methodological approach was
required. This approach would employ the methods and tools to collect the data needed
and thus best achieve the study's objectives, including the justification for the author
chosen approaches.
3.1. Research Approach The following research onion approach represents the methodology chosen for the
investigation. According to Saunders et al. (2009), this model enables the author to guide
and illustrate the process and choices of data collection used in this research. Figure 4
illustrates the components based on the research onion.
Figure 4: Research Onion
Source: adapted from Saunders et al. 2009, p. 108
In most educational research, the issue of the validity has been significantly
considered and posed in very general terms as: ‘how well has the data set generated from
this research approach reflect the phenomena it is intended to cover?’ (Marschan-Piekkari
25
and Welch 2004, p. 469). Fundamentally, philosophical concerns are an elementary
component of the research process and tend to occupy a prominent place in educational
research. As such, these philosophical issues cannot be ignored because they comprise
what research silently thinks about research, related to the binary opposition quantitative –
qualitative (Scott and Usher, 2011).
Nevertheless, further specific formulation of validity criteria can alter its outcomes
regarding the researcher’s ontological and epistemological viewpoint (Marschan-Piekkari
and Welch, 2004). Freimuth (2009) supports this view by suggesting that ontology and
epistemology can influence one’s choice of research paradigms, techniques and methods.
Thus, these two paradigms may influence many ways of research design and conclusion.
Therefore the researcher considers it significant to discuss and appreciate the different
research paradigms regarding the levels of epistemological and ontological frames that
underpin the use throughout the research phase, to ensure the research approaches are
aligned to the nature of the investigation (Marschan-Piekkari and Welch, 2004).
Primarily, ontology is defined as science or study correlated to the nature of being
and existence. An ontological position is defined by considering reality as dynamic, global
and built on this integrative process of social realities. This concept tends to be
problematic, because instead of accepting a world where causal mechanisms are waiting
to be empirically discovered, an ontological approach tends to implement an on-going
building process, conducted by reflexive actors who are unable to offer a completely
objective social reality of the issues investigated. Among the different social ontologies, the
methodological framework should reflect and seek similarities between the alleged
differences. While positivism adheres to reality, this study was based on constructivist
transactions and thus oriented towards subjective conclusions, which were engendered by
construction activities and the significance of the individual groups (Cupchik, 2001).
In contrast, the definition of epistemology is presented as the study of the nature
and extent of knowledge and truth. From this perspective, facing the hypothetical pathway,
deductive research tends to assume an inductive approach. The epistemological concept
of a study matches the research and the theory used to understand the problem. Choosing
the right theory is vital to conceptualise the processes of analysing and understanding the
phenomena to be investigated. Epistemological assumptions in the research process can
influence understanding and interpretation of data. Should the differences be observed
from an epistemological approach - the problem of research definition, for example? In
26
addition to its logical relationship to the research design, what will be discovered? How will
it work? And with which methods (Holloway 2003; Freimuth 2009).
Whilst the term ontology concerns what comprises reality, this needs to be
distinguished from epistemology which constitutes the view of how researchers can know
the reality they wish to describe, by considering the most suitable ways to achieve and
interpret this knowledge and adopting strategies which rely on methods that enable the
researcher to collect the appropriate data and then analyse it (Freimuth 2009; Scott and
Morrison 2005).
Whereas these two paradigms contribute to the essence of knowledge, truth and
being (Freimuth, 2009); clearly there is a fixed relationship between ontology and
epistemology and other components of the research process, as well as in the belief they
have regarding the nature of reality and how this influences researchers understanding.
Therefore it is possible to illustrate these elements and indicate a set of possible relations
in the way as depicted in figure 5 (Marschan-Piekkari and Welch 2004; Scott & Morrison
2005).
Figure 5: Methodological levels
Source: adapted from (Marschan-Piekkari and Welch, 2004 p. 470).
27
Figure 5 shows how the research strategy has been chosen (regarding the
methodological approach to the research question, such as carrying out a conceptual
study, supported by both qualitative and quantitative studies to investigate the research
question) and how it correlates to the researcher’s common epistemological perspective.
Therefore, the author followed an epistemological research philosophy and gave
preference to an interpretive nature, influenced by the author’s ontological beliefs regarding
the objective, as detailed in section 1.2.3, and/or subjective nature of human reality.
However from an ontological standpoint, the author adopted a social constructivist
approach to ensure validity and describe social reality (Marschan-Piekkari and Welch
2004).
The project investigated different perceptions of the current Spanish economic crisis
and how to improve its competitiveness, canvassing politicians, economists and
organisations for their perceptions. That was why this study implemented an interpretive
approach - to answer the questions developed for the investigation. The main purpose was
to understand the phenomenon from the perspective of participants in the current economic
situation in Spain and not from the perspective of the researcher (Maxwell, 2005). A
researcher selects, verifies, eliminates and transforms arguments, interpreting meaning
regarding the situation in which he or she is immersed. Interpretation is however not a
simple, automatic application of established meanings, but rather a formative process in
which meanings are used and revised as instruments for the guidance and training of the
act (Blumer, 1969). Walsham (1995 cited in Rowlands, 2005 p. 81-82) defines interpretive
research as that which ‘does not predefine dependent or independent variables, does not
set out to test hypotheses, but aims to produce an understanding of the social context of
the phenomenon and the process whereby the phenomenon influences and is influenced
by the social context’. Shankar and Goulding (2001 p.8) also remark that ‘the interpretive
researchers' goal is not the “truth” because it can never be proven; rather their goal is
hermeneutic understanding or verstehen’. From this perspective, any interpretive research
is theory-based; its main goal is to go beyond finding the ‘truth’ and obtains a richer, deeper
picture of the Spanish economic crisis and its lack of competitiveness.
3.1.1 Research Method Approaches: Deductive and Inductive
Tracy (2013) argues that there are two approaches to developing scientific
research: deductive and inductive approaches. The fundamental difference is that the
former aims to demonstrate, by pure logic, any conclusions entirely from premises, so as to
ensure the veracity of such conclusions, lest the logic be invalidated. Choosing an inductive
method allowed the researcher to better understand the Spanish economic crisis and its
28
lack of competitiveness, by generalising the observed behaviour: indeed, the main goal of
this study was to establish generalisation, thus developing a clearer picture of and
conclusions about the objectives of this study. An inductive approach poses limitations: it
may be difficult to follow up on any research and conclusions may be unreliable. On the
other hand, the author made a partial implementation of the logic that maintains the validity
of this research (Saunders et al. 2009). The inductive approach offered the author a better
chance of understanding the factors that led Spain to this situation, as well as identifying
alternative ways of ending the Spanish crisis by improving its competitiveness (Tracy,
2013).
3.2. Research Design A complex judgment regards whether the right approach to the study could include
both quantitative and qualitative research. Simplifying the differences between the two
approaches may suggest that qualitative research normally just uses words, whereas
quantitative research tends to use simplified numbers - but this is only part of the truth. The
real differences lie in the work plan, the ways of collecting the data and, above all, how an
analysis of the information is conducted. Each method is linked to a distinct and unique
paradigmatic perspective (Guest et al. 2013). The research in this study was based on the
qualitative research method. Denzin and Lincoln (1994 cited in Klenke, 2008 p.7) define
qualitative research as ‘multi-method in focus, involving an interpretive, naturalistic
approach to its subject matter. This means that qualitative researchers study things in their
natural setting, attempting to make sense of or interpret phenomena in terms of the
meanings people bring to them. Qualitative research involves the studied use and
collection of a variety of empirical materials – case study, personal experience,
introspective, life story, interview, observational, historical, interactional, and visual texts –
that describe routine and problematic moments and meaning in individuals' lives’.
Many quantitative researchers criticise qualitative studies, asserting that qualitative
research does not produce valid findings. This method is also ineffective in understanding
social, political and economic perspectives, as it is unable to deal with the complexities of a
group or person, and thus is not helpful in analysing the ideals and knowledge of
participants (Balcázar et al. 2005). The researcher believes that to understand the
catalysts of the Spanish economic crisis and analyse the country’s competitiveness, it was
necessary to conduct interviews and focus groups, as these are the only data collection
methods with sufficient sensitivity to capture the research objectives (Corbin and Strauss
2008). The rationale behind choosing qualitative approach for this research is that it has
enabled the author to obtain an empirical view, incorporating the perceptions and concerns
29
of each participant This method enabled the researcher to analyse the reality of the topic
and ensured the validity and reliability of the research (Soler, 2001).
To meet the research objective, the author needed to understand the main causes
of Spain´s current crises. Secondly, to examine which economic policies and theories could
provide a solution to the crisis; and thirdly, how Spain could enhance its competitiveness.
The first justification in choosing the research design is that it was imperative, with respect
to the process of participant observation, to adopt a qualitative approach. This qualitative
approach facilitated the author to gain concepts and perceptions in order to develop a
better understanding of social phenomena in their natural setting. Another rationale was
that this method allowed the researcher to interpret phenomena in terms of meanings,
experiences and obtain different view-points with regards to the participants involved
(Neergaard and Ulhoi 2007; Denzin and Lincoln 2013).
This type of research usually focuses on the analysis of discourse: words,
semantics and the environment surrounding a particular object of study. The most
commonly-used tools in the field of qualitative research are surveys, in-depth interviews
and focus groups. This study was conducted through five in-depth interviews with different
individuals, including a Spanish economist, a politician and a member of the 15-M
Movement to collect different perspectives on the Spanish crisis and its lack of
competitiveness. It also used a focus group with highly qualified young Spaniards who had
immigrated to England due to the lack of job opportunities in Spain. The rationale to choose
a focus group was to obtain appropriate and valid qualitative data, alongside capturing the
perspectives of each individual apropos the Spanish economy and its competitiveness
(Biggam, 2011).
3.3. Research Strategy This case study deployed a qualitative research method. Empirically-orientated, in-
depth understanding of a subject can encompass different facets: an individual, an
institution, an educational program, a community or a culture - in short, any group sharing
ideological or common beliefs. Yin (2009) considers the case study as a research design
strategy. This study was a descriptive, comprehensive and in-depth case, attempting to
identify the problems and underlying causes of the economic crisis in Spain and how to
enhance its competitiveness. Yin (2008 cited in Merriam 2009 p.40) defines a case study
as ‘an empirical inquiry that investigates a contemporary phenomenon within its real-life
context, especially when the boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly
evident’. Case studies provide a better understanding of a particular phenomenon, to clarify
30
an issue or complex theoretical question or inquire into any phenomenon, situation or
group (Stake, 1995). Furthermore, Merrian (1988 p.13) attributed to the case study
particular characteristics: descriptive, heuristic and inductive. This study focused on
inductive as ‘for the most part, case studies rely on inductive reasoning. Generalization,
concepts, or hypotheses emerge from an examination of data - data grounded in the
context itself. Occasionally one may have tentative working hypotheses at the outset of the
case study, but these expectations are subject to reformulation as the study proceeds -
discovery of new relationships, concepts, and understanding, rather than verification or
predetermined hypotheses, characterizes qualitative case studies’.
Analysis of the external validity of results was part of the investigation. It was critical
to adopt the right tone; as proposed via the replication process, the case study research
needed a theoretical basis to explain the phenomena investigated and determine the
conditions of generalisation or transferability of the results obtained. These conditions had
to be stated explicitly in the final research report. The main advantage of this case study
was that it provided an understanding of the 'Spanish crisis' and its lack of competitiveness
holistically. The type of knowledge obtained through this case study has opened up new
interpretations of the complexity of the phenomenon. Therefore, future readers play an
active role in interpreting the data that the researcher has provided and analysing the
validity of their conclusions. Still, it must be emphasised that the case study has received
much criticism, especially in relation to external validity but also on internal validity,
reliability or validity of constructs. It also seems that the case study offers a poor basis for
statistical generalisations; ideally the case study should provide statistical samples that
similar cases would correspond to, meaning results could be generalised (Yin, 2009;
Merrian, 1988).
3.4. Research Methods The aim of this research was to capture relevant information for a descriptive
analysis of the study´s issues, firstly through secondary data (chapter two) – information
already collected by someone else, i.e. journals, annual reports, books, newspapers and
organisation websites - and secondly through primary data obtained through interviews and
a focus group, with the advantage that, being generated by the author, it could be
controlled and adjusted in the most appropriate ways (Naghi, 2005). Empirically-based data
tends to lack theory when framing the research process, but in this study, a conceptual
framework was derived from the review of texts that dealt with the objectives of this study.
However the attraction of empirical research is precisely to stop talking about something
factual and escape from theories (Yanow and Schwartz-Shea 2006). In most educational
31
research methods, Scott and Usher (2002) identified some features of research which are
taken to be as mainly a systematic, rigorous and methodical. Based on these
characteristics, the researcher considered adopting empirical research as the most
appropriate research form for this investigation, because it involves the collection, analysis
and presentation of primary data in a rigorous, systematic and methodical way.
Table 2: Research Methods
Primary data Secondary data
- Primary data was theoretically
constructed using profiling, to identify
participants who would contribute to a
comprehensive understanding of the issue
being studied - the Spanish economic
crisis. The profiles possessed particular
characteristics that the researcher believed
would provide excellent qualitative data on
the study; the participants chosen fulfilled
this criterion, as they had relevant
experience and close links to the crisis.
- The advantage of primary data is that the
author has generated it, which means it
can been adapted to meet the objectives
of this study. Moreover, this primary data is
more current than much of the secondary
data, and represents a high-value
confidential resource for research because
this data did not exist before, so it is
unique (Naghi, 2005).
- Secondary data has provided the author
with a theoretical framework to find,
access and obtain accurate and relevant
information for this project. This data has
granted a better perspective on the
foundations that influence the Spanish
economy. This understanding has led to a
new perspective on which to analyse and
criticize its effects, even socially (Naghi,
2005).
- The main theoretical models used in this
study are the theories of Michael Porter,
based on his concept of competitiveness
through creativity and innovation; priorities
for nations if they wish to gain a
sustainable competitive advantage (Porter,
1990). The literature analyses the levels of
Spain's competitiveness, based on the
Global Competitiveness Index that is
conducted annually by the WEF. The
author also acknowledges the theories of
Adam Smith, who believed he had found a
way of balancing the individual interests of
the people and the competitive nature of
nations (Smith, 1776).
Source: Naghi, 2005; Smith, 1776; Porter, 1990; WEF, 2013.
32
3.4.1. Interviews Design
This methodology contains some risks: the researcher faces a disadvantage in that
such interviews provide small samples, so results cannot necessarily be applied elsewhere
(Denscombe, 2003). The key advantage of the in-depth interview is that the interviewer can
explore issues that arise during the interview. The most traditional way for depth-interviews
to be conducted is face-to-face because it is the most satisfactory method for conducting a
successful interview. Due to the inability of the author to travel to Spain to carry out the
interviews, four interviews were conducted by telephone and one face-to-face in
Manchester. The main advantages of telephone interviews are that they save time, as they
are more scripted and thus performed more rapidly than the face-to-face interview.
Telephone interviews can also cover wider geographical territory without the researcher
having to move, saving costs in the study. However this method could cause a lack of
motivation because it does not provide direct contact with the interviewers. The duration of
every interview was a mean of 45 minutes (Taylor et al. 2006; Silver et al. 2013).
Interviews can be structured, semi-structured or unstructured. Because the
interviewees were familiar with the topic, it was more permissible to conduct an
unstructured interview, in which the researcher choses the structure and context. The
advantage of this type of interview is that the interviewer was able to thoroughly explore
issues emerging during the interviews; the disadvantage is that this type of interview was
difficult to code, and did not test hypotheses. It is used for obtaining primary data in a
specific area - which can often be unpredictable and unknowable in advance - and possibly
formulating a subsequent hypothesis (Denscombe, 2003). Before administering the final
version of the questions, it is advisable to test questions via pilot interviews to ensure they
work. The aim of the pilot study was to clarify and evaluate the quality of questions. In
addition, the researcher sent outline questions in advance to the interviewees as guidance,
to help them feel prepared for the interviews (Moore, 2000).
3.4.2. Focus Group
According to Sim and Snell (1996 cited in Sim, 1998 p.346) a focus group is ‘a
group interview – centred on a specific topic (‘focus’) and facilitated and co-ordinated by a
moderator or facilitator – which seeks to generate primarily qualitative data, by capitalising
on the interaction that occurs within the group setting’. In other words the focus group is a
qualitative research technique, ideal for providing understanding. In this study, there were
eight people - under the guidance of a moderator, they talk freely about the topic selected
by the researcher. Usually the researcher chooses the participants because he believes
33
their opinions and ideas will assist in achieving the research goals. Questions should be
formulated in accessible language according to the participants, and their cultural context
should also be explained. Social interaction was an essential feature of the focus group as
the dynamics created between the participants revealed their perceptions of reality and
their beliefs about the Spanish crisis and its lack of competitiveness. The interaction also
allowed participants to question each other and reconsider their own views about their
specific experiences.
Table 3: Focus group advantages and disadvantages
Advantages: The first advantage of focus group research is that an overall picture of
the knowledge, attitudes and social behaviour of a social group - and how each
individual is influenced by another in a group situation - can be obtained. Another
advantage is that it can analyse the information in a way that helps researchers to find
out which issues are important and which are not.
Disadvantages: The major focus group limitation is that the researcher chose the
group, which limits the ability to generate representative results (mainly because the
number of participants is relatively small and unrepresentative). Moreover, the
moderator has less control over the validity and reliability of the findings than found in
other data collection techniques. Another disadvantage is that by its very nature it is
difficult to plan focus groups in relation to time management, development of the topics
to be discussed and achieving collective agreement or representative conclusions. The
moderator's role is vital in this method because what seems an advantage in these
cases can become a disadvantage - a moderator must possess leadership and
communication skills to successfully coordinate and moderate a focus group.
Source: Morgan, 1997.
3.5. Sampling Murphy et al. (1998) comment that in qualitative research, study design evolves
throughout the project. Qualitative studies almost always use small samples; this does not
mean that it cannot obtain quality results, however. Qualitative research uses progressive
sampling and is subject to the dynamics derived from the research findings. The samples
are not predetermined; sequential sampling is theoretically driven, not set randomly or by
using mathematical formulas. The sample is important because it is the key qualitative
34
research. The logic of sampling in qualitative studies is totally different from quantitative
studies. Sampling is not done probabilistically, and the sample is not representative
according to statistical criteria.
This study utilised purposive sampling, which meant that the sampling was not
chosen for statistical representativeness but on how representative the discourse was
regarding the economic crisis and its lack of competitiveness in Spain. The researcher
sought out people who would provide quality answers to achieve the goals of this research,
alongside the main aim of interpreting the profound economic crisis. The justification to this
strategy is that it penetrates the field; its strength does not depend on the sample size
used, as qualitative research generally uses small samples.
Thanks to the perspicacious choice of participants, the sampling provided rich and
complete information and was considered sufficient because the information obtained by
the author achieved the objectives of the study. Sample size is generally determined by the
quality and quantity of information required. The sample design was done as a theoretical
construct that accompanied the body of the study, and the selection of participants in the
sample was carried out according to the profiles defined conceptually. The profiles were of
people with certain characteristics that the researcher speculated might influence the
meaning of the studied phenomenon. Table 3 shows in more detail why these participants
were chosen, their work experience and their relationship to the topic (Denscombe 2003;
Blankenship 2010; Atkinson and Hammersley 2007).
Table 4: Interview Participants Background
Name
Nationality
Education
Occupation
Participant 1
Tania Sánchez
Melero
Spanish
Graduate in Social Education; second
degree in Social and Cultural Anthropology, she is also currently
doing a Masters degree in Democratic Leadership
and Political Communication
United Left (IU)
representative. The IU is the third-
largest Spanish political party. She
is a regular contributor to three of the most popular
political debate programmes on
Spanish television: La Tuerka, La
Sexta Noche and El Gato al Agua.
35
Participant 2
Dr. Juan Torres López
Spanish
Graduate in Economics
and Business
Ph.D. in Economics and Business
He has been a professor at the
University of Seville since 2008, in the
Department of Economic Theory
and Political Economy. He is the
author of over 15 books on economy, amongst which are 'Hay Alternativas'
('There are Alternatives') and 'La crisis de las
hipotecas basura. ¿Por qué se cayó todo y no se ha
hundido nada?'('The crisis of
the subprime mortgage. Why has
everything fallen and nothing has
sunk?').
Participant 3
Javier Fernández
Cruz
Spanish
Senior Technician Computer System
Administration English Philology and Masters in Teaching.
Member of 15M Movement. Also
known as the Occupy movement,
it is a citizens' movement which
aims to show discontent with
Spanish politicians and their economic measures, and how
their mismanagement is contributing to the
Spanish crisis.
Participant 4
Jorge A. Calvo
Pazos
Spanish
Graduate in
Hispanic Studies and History
Ex-general secretary of
Socialist Youths of Galicia (Spain).
36
3.6. Data Analysis Recording the information provided by the interviewer and the focus group helped
the researcher because it can be replayed at any point, to rescue information that was not
considered relevant during the interview. The interviews planned for this study were
recorded to accumulate more tangible data found in the words of the interviewees.
Four of the interviews were conducted in Spanish to avoid language limitations. The
interviews were then translated into English. The translation process might have led to
some alteration of the data, owing to differences in meaning between both languages. One
interview was conducted in English (Greenfield, 1996).
Analysis of qualitative data can be daunting for any researcher, so it is important to
recognise that there is no single way to analyse qualitative data properly. Therefore it is
vital to find the most productive way of analysing the data. In addition, no matter how well
the interview has gone, the use of the information collected depended on its being
organised and accessible (Guest et al. 2013). Coffey and Atkinson (1996) emphasise that
Participant 5
Dr. Stuart Barrett
British
Graduate in Economic Economics and Politics
MSc in International Business and MBA
Stuart’s Ph.D. was
focused on multinational investment in the United
States.
Senior Lecturer at
Manchester Metropolitan University. Teaching
specialisms: ‘International
Business, Business Economics and
Asia-Pacific Economics and
Business’
Participant 6
Focus Group
Spanish
Focus Group shared with
young Spaniards who have graduated in
different areas such as Business Administration
and Management, Economics, Teaching,
Tourism and Telecommunications
Engineering
Due to the
economic situation in Spain, these highly qualified
young Spaniards have moved to
Manchester, where they looked for job
opportunities.
37
once the information has been collected and transcribed, the challenge is to simplify and
make sense of the complexity contained in the recordings and notes. The coding system is
useful when splitting up and compartmentalising the data to obtain more general
categories, as well as extracting data in order to formulate new questions and levels of
interpretation. This stage of codification consists of reading all the data line by line and
identifying the data with a code. Such codes must be linked to the research question, thus
allowing simplification and standardisation of the large amount and variety of data
collected. In terms of the interviews' validity, the uniquely secure procedure for verification
is to check that the results conform to reality (Greenfield, 1996).
Table 5: The process of qualitative data analysis
1. Record the data:
- Take notes, video, recorder and photography.
2. Listen and write down information.
3. Read and organise data:
- Number and classifying.
- Make comments in the margins.
4. Analyse the contents:
- Identify categories.
- Search the information related each category.
- Identification of the various aspects relating to the categories.
- Write summaries.
- Identify examples (quotes) frequencies/exceptions.
5. Describe the results:
- Similarities.
- Differences.
6. Interpret results of theory generation:
- Themes.
- Individuals (case studies).
Source: adapted from Vazquez et al. 2006 p.102.
38
The author collected qualitative data by recording interviews and taking detailed
notes during each interview. A full transcription was then made of the collected material
(verbatim) in both English and Spanish. (See Appendix B). A code is often assigned to an
interview to maintain confidentiality, but in this case the interviewees gave consent for their
names to be referenced in this dissertation. The most relevant data were identified and
sorted into subcategories, as well as encoded. These units of analysis were necessary.
The final phase of the analysis was interpretation: establishing relationships and
developing explanations provided a framework which ensured the findings make sense
(Coffey and Atkinson 1996; Vazquez et al. 2006).
3.7. Ethics Kumar (2005) argues that being ethical plays a crucial role in ensuring that research
will have no harmful effect on the project. In the hypothetical case that one cannot be
ethical, it is strongly recommended that the researcher seeks other alternatives for study. In
planning the interviews for this project, the researcher informed the participants of the basis
for the research and why they had been chosen to collaborate. There were also
assurances of the confidentiality: this promise of ethical and moral conduct was submitted
via email and verbally before each interview (Bell, 2005). Unethical behaviour could be (for
example) persuading the interviewees of a certain view point by citing data from other
authors without proper references - presenting it as original data from the researcher,
which constitutes plagiarism (Hammersley and Traianou, 2012). The researcher followed
the ethical guidelines and code of conduct of Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU),
ensuring that participants were not offended at any time. The researcher was objective with
each interviewee. By following these guidelines, the researcher ensures that the project is
an original piece of work and avoids plagiarism. At the end of the study, the participants
were offered a final copy of the research.
3.8. Conclusion This chapter has revealed the different methodological approaches used in the
research to collect appropriate data for this dissertation. This was obtained by generating a
primary data collection, gathered through five in-depth interviews and one focus group, to
explore the views of chosen participants. Additionally, this chapter discusses why the
methods were chosen as sampling strategies and types of interviews used. Finally, this
chapter details the steps followed by the author to analyse the primary data.
40
4. Introduction This chapter presents the results generated after the analysis of literature and
primary data. It looks for similarities and contrasts between the findings through logical and
thoughtful interpretation. The chapter begins with an analysis of the real causes of the
Spanish economic crisis; later, it examines the main pillars that Spain could improve to
enhance the country’s competitiveness; sub-themes were identified to develop theoretical
structures from the data collected and analysed systematically to achieve a degree of
abstraction from empirical data.
4.1. The catalysts of the Spanish economic crisis The findings from the primary data were fully supported by the source literature
used in the study. Between both the data and the literature, it seemed there was significant
consensus on the causes of the economic crisis in Spain. The results identified several
reasons for the crisis, centring on three main reasons why this uncertain economic situation
has arisen in Spain.
Firstly, a capitalist system focusing on economic growth based on housing
speculation constitutes the backbone of the current crisis. This began in the United States
via high-risk subprime mortgages, provided to people with low incomes. Banks gave out so
many mortgages that they lost their liquidity, and had to resort to titling assets. When the
largest American banks went bankrupt, they created a global crisis that has harshly
affected Spain, as the country's main economic driver was the property sector (Torres,
2010; Participant 1; Participant 6). Moreover, Participant 4 supported the argument that
Spain is suffering more from this crisis owing to a lack of competitiveness in other sectors.
For instance, in the UK there was also a property bubble burst; however it was not felt as
keenly because the UK is competitive in other sectors and the economy is more
sustainable. (Participant 2; Participant 1).
‘… the theory of diminishing returns, if you have a large amount of a product and
put it in the market at once, its price will decrease. If potatoes are very common,
their price will drop [...] So it was unnatural that the same thing was not happening
with the housing market. It was said prices would not go down and indeed they did
not go down […] the housing market bubble got bigger because of the rumour that
prices would not go down (Participant 4 p.95).
41
‘In short, it is a crisis of capitalism. As every other crisis, instead of being resolved it
is moved - so the financial crisis was moved from the private sector to the public
sector, with the debt being absorbed by public entities’ (Participant 1 p.69).
The second reason for the crisis is Spain's unsustainable economic model, based
on housing speculation, which created a real-estate bubble; the literature also suggested
that the PP, the ruling government, may have added fuel to the fire through the Land Law
in 2008, which led to an increase in the number of houses built in Spain by 30% - the
highest in the EU (Gay de Liébana, 2012). In contrast, by studying the primary data, it was
crucial to emphasise that low interest rates in the Eurozone in recent years were simply too
low for those countries which used them, leading to a credit boom (Participant 5).
The literature argues that during this time of prosperity, public administrations
wasted money on unnecessary projects; leading to public debt reaching €882 billion (84%
of GDP in 2012) and 6,202,700 million unemployed (European Commission, 2013;
Jiménez and Mars, 2013). In addition, primary data suggested that part of the debt is totally
illegitimate, meaning it should be audited as it has been caused by manipulation of markets
and citizens should not have to take on the debt (Participant 1; Participant 4).
‘International law says that illegitimate debt is against the interests of citizenship
and that when this occurs the debt should not be repaid. If this part of the debt is
the bit that Rajoy has dedicated to rescuing the banks, which up to now will have to
be repaid by the Spanish public, at the end of the day it is transforming private debt
into public debt’ (Participant 4 p.96).
‘Germany is very interested in charging that debt, because they are the major
creditors’ (Participant 6, p.108).
‘…low interest rates have caused a boom in credit - both private and public
borrowing - so when the global economy slowed down, Spain was in trouble’
(Participant 5, p.101).
Primary data also identified that Spain would receive great pressure from its
creditors if it refused to pay part off its debt (Participant, 2); it would receive pressure from
northern European countries, which is why Spain should seek allies in southern Europe in
order to reconfigure European politics. A single country is not going to achieve anything
and provide a counterweight to Europe. However as Europe is not immutable, and has
42
been built without sufficient flexibility, Spain should acquire alliances with non-European
nations with democratic criteria, without losing the sovereignty and economic decision-
making powers of community countries (Participant 1).
‘We have been allotted a peripheral role in Europe; therefore we are doomed to our
population having no more hope than to be the servants of the richest nations in
Europe. We have to stop and say that our citizens have the same rights as the rest
of Europe’ (Participant 1, p.71).
The third cause is the creation of a single currency (Euro); literature demonstrated
that when Spain relinquished its sovereign currency (Peseta) to the Euro, with the creation
of the ECB (which has legal powers to develop monetary policy and inflation) that monetary
union is not sustainable due to divergent economic and fiscal policies (Fink and Salvatore,
1999). The primary data had a significant relationship with this theory, as history shows that
the easiest way to get out of debt is through inflation. The easiest way to do that is to print
money, but the ECB wants to maintain tight monetary conditions because it is against the
policy of printing money and inflating debt. This decision goes against the people by
generating general impoverishment in the peripheral European countries (Participant 5).
The measures favour the financial powers, leaving the capital concentrated in the hands of
the richest - making the rich richer and the poor poorer (Participant 1).
Spain is a country where the workers produce 85% of revenue and yet capital is
taxed at the low figure of 15%. This system does not favour workers and poor families; it
breaches the Spanish Constitution, which states that the fiscal system must be
progressive. There is a lack of adequate transparency in the law, which could help end the
corruption afflicting the country; however the political crisis in Spain has no correlation with
the economic crisis. The origin of the political crisis came from the transition to a
democratic Spain, because the transition was not based on a rupture: instead, the new
government merely adapted Franco's institutions to the new political situation. If electoral
law does not represent the will of the people, not all votes possess the same value and a
political party can obtain an absolute majority with less than 28% of the votes, it is
necessary to create a new electoral law, to end that bipartisan system (Participant 4;
Participant 1). In contrast, Participant 5 argued that the political crisis is the same in all of
southern Europe: it is caused by economic problems - politicians do not have the answer
because it is a problem of the Euro. For this reason, politicians cannot do anything, as they
have no monetary policy tools available to them. These factors could be the real causes of
the Spanish economic crisis.
43
‘…is also a way of perpetuation of an economic and social model of development,
where powerful figures who were not standing for elections were sent, meaning
large firms and financial markets have retained the economic and political power of
the country’ (Participant 1, p.73).
‘I think now we place more attention on the political crisis due to the extremely weak
economic situation in the country. That is, before this we had the same amount of
thieves (or even more) but as things were going well, and the population
overwhelmingly lived in economic good times, we did not care about these
robberies and corruption scandals’ (Participant 6, p.107).
‘In the 1929 credit crunch, one strategy that helped the U.S. out of the crisis was
that the richest and largest companies paid more than 60% of their earnings in
taxes' (Participant 4 p.97).
4.2. The austerity measures taken by the EU According to the literature, the high public debt has led the Spanish government to
make cuts of €27 billion, predicated by the harsh austerity measures imposed by the IMF,
ECB and EU. In the most important sectors of any nation, such as health and education,
these cuts will in the short, medium and long terms have negative spill-over for the
economy and citizenship (BBC, 2012). These neoliberal political measures, headed by a
capitalist system, are dismantling the Spanish welfare state for the purpose of meeting the
public deficit level agreed in the Maastricht Treaty, which says that no country should have
public deficit above 3% of its GDP. The austerity measures, such as tax increases and
wage cuts for Spanish workers, are decreasing domestic demand (Gay de Liébana, 2012).
Both the primary and secondary data argued that there is not a single case in history where
a developed country has recovered from a debt crisis through austerity measures. In the
past three years Spain has been trying to end the crisis through these measures, yet
figures demonstrate that whenever the unemployment rate has increased in a year, public
debt has also increased. These measures mean citizens have less money, therefore they
spend less; businesses earn less money for the same reason and many are forced to lay
off employees, causing a short-term negative impact on the public.
Primary data also confirmed that these types of policy measures do not guarantee
collective welfare, and are only intended to ensure that German creditors charge the debt
that Spain holds with them. They do not facilitate short-term economic growth, which is
44
what the country needs to reduce its high level of unemployment and eradicate the poverty
level of 20% that the country faces. It was important to note that perhaps it is time that
countries from the European periphery create a counterpart to the ECB - otherwise the
situation will become increasingly unsustainable (Participant 1). The economic and social
damage caused by the austerity measures will be extremely difficult to repair and will
threaten the Spanish welfare state that has developed in the short history of democracy in
the country.
‘Anyone who assumes that politics should be about ensuring collective welfare and
equitable distribution of power, and that the weak must be protected by
governments, believe that all the austerity measures taken are wrong’ (Participant
1, p.71).
‘What Spain needs is growth and it cannot have growth with the level of debt
hanging over it with austerity, and not being able to print its own money. Britain is
seeing growth because it has its own currency and can print and create money.
Spain cannot do this, so austerity is a nonsense policy which makes things worse.
Spain has no choice; it does not have its own currency’ (Participant 5, p.102).
One recent example of the effects of austerity reforms is Greece, where welfare
cuts and austerity measures which aimed to improve competitiveness are instead causing
severe economic problems. But such reforms are not sufficient to achieve sustainable
growth and achieve the deficit targets agreed by EU. In any case, the growth of the
economy is still limited, and far from creating job opportunities for their citizens
(Monastiriotis, 2011).
4.3. Spain’s competitiveness A noteworthy finding was the claims that in Spain, it is assumed that
competitiveness means selling products at lower prices and offering lower wages to
employees; it is not appreciated that a product can compete because it is high quality, and
that Spain could address the issue of competitiveness by investing in both innovation and
R&D - like other European countries with a high rate of competitiveness such as Finland,
Sweden and Holland - rather than by lowering workers daily wages (Participant 2;
Participant 4).
45
The findings correlated with a previous study, which argued that competitiveness
could be gained by either offering consumers better value, by offering lower prices than
competitors or by providing greater benefits and services that excuses higher prices.
Nowadays any competitive advantage that is generated by innovation or creativity involves
large investments in human capital, training and R&D (Porter, 1985).
'…competitiveness is another concept absolutely lacking in rigour [...] if
competitiveness is understood as the best ability to sell outside a country's borders,
we suffer from cynicism, as the economy does not have to be entirely geared
towards the external market' (Participant 2 p.86).
‘Spain is not competitive against Germany, which is who you have to be
competitive against. Again, a big problem with that is that you have the same
currency. If Spain had its own currency, it could let the peseta fall in value so your
exports would be competitive - but you cannot do that. I do not know why they
entered the Euro' (Participant 5 p.104).
A previous study revealed that Spain has a delicate macroeconomic situation, a
factor that causes weakness in competitiveness. Furthermore, it was identified that the
country has serious issues in the key pillars which are crucial for a country to be
competitive globally, such as productivity (ranked 133rd), the labour market (123rd), the
educational system (81st), innovation (44th) and the banking system (109th). Improving
these pillars would be a possible alternative in overcoming the dire situation afflicting Spain
since 2008 (WEF, 2013).
4.3.1. Productivity
The literature stated that a nation is richer than its competitors because the
productivity of its companies is better than that of competitor’s countries, thus gaining a
competitive advantage (Porter, 1990). According to this study, Spain is seeing weaker
growth in labour productivity compared with other northern European countries, which is
why Spain has to improve its productivity to create wealth for the nation. The data
demonstrated that Spanish employees work more hours than in other EU countries but are
less productive; this is why the ECB and the IMF are forcing Spain to reduce wages,
because they believe that Spanish salaries are higher than their productivity levels allow.
This means Spanish workers earn salaries 40% to 50% lower than their counterparts in
northern European countries (OECD, 2012a).
46
The responses of the primary data strongly disagreed with this theory, as it came
from the power of the financial markets; the concept of productivity used in general for the
whole economy is not robust, because it would have to be applied to different activities.
The problem is that Spain belongs to the Eurozone and has to compete at the level of
France and Germany, who produce greater quantity, so in effect are more productive
because they have higher added value. There are two ways to be competitive: one, with a
high-quality product at expensive prices, which requires investment in innovation and
technology; two, with low prices based on low wages. Spain can no longer be considered
cheap because it has the currency of a rich country - which is why businesses must
introduce more innovative components, technology and training for workers in order to
enhance their productivity, instead of reducing the wages of workers. In addition, increasing
the minimum wage would be a way out of the crisis as there is currently a shortage of
demand for jobs whilst wages are low; income growth through a rise in wages would
increase both demand and consumption in the country (Participant 2; Participant 5).
‘I do not know why they think we are unproductive citizens. I have not seen any
English people work with the same efficiency as a Spanish person. It is an excuse
to justify the reduction of wages' (Participant 6, p.111).
‘It has to be differentiated according to the economic activities. What occurs is that
some countries that have greater acquired amounts seem more productive because
they have higher value-added, components of technology and innovation and
therefore what should be done is to increase the space these sectors occupy in the
Spanish economy’ (Participant 2 p.85).
4.3.2. Labour Market
By studying the literature and primary data in detail, it was concluded that there was
a significant relationship; the results argued that the figure of unemployment in Spain -
27.16% - highlighted the weaknesses of the country's labour market system. However, the
literature found that the Spanish government recently introduced new labour reform with
the main aim of becoming more a flexible, competitive and productive country. The
government aims to facilitate job creation by reducing the costs of laying-off permanent
workers and motivating businesses to hire more, based on the theory that firms are more
likely to hire workers if they know that, should the market change, they can make people
redundant at any time at minimum cost (Gutierrez, 2013). However the primary data, in
contrast, demonstrated that years after the reform, new jobs have not been created; in fact,
the number of unemployed has increased. This is having negative consequences, as
workers work longer for less money and have fewer rights. The reform has given
47
businesses the right to do what they want with their employees (Participant 2).
Participant 3 p.93 also argues that the Spanish government should do 'the opposite
of what is being done - as well as providing more protection for workers, measures
that facilitate the creation of employment for companies, more job security... if there
is no security, there is no confidence when it comes to consuming. There should be
an advance and not a regression in social rights’.
‘…the theory is that companies do not hire because employee dismissal is very
expensive, so they do not want to hand permanent contracts to their employees. On
one hand this theory is good, but this theory does not apply in Spain because
Spanish entrepreneurs are not looking after their employees'. (Participant 4 p.99).
In contrast, participant 5 strongly disagreed with the other respondents when he
argued against the notion that, as it is expensive to make people redundant, firms do not
hire them in the first place. The labour market must be more flexible because businesses
are more likely to employ if they know that, should the market change, they can get reduce
staffing. Moreover, that unemployment is high is not so much to do with labour market
reform as with the general economic situation. It does not matter what reforms the
government makes to the labour market in Spain, as it is the general economic situation
that is the problem. Labour market reform is for the future - it is for the next crisis.
4.3.3. Education
The literature identified that human capital is vital in creating wealth in a nation. The
key pillar to maintaining and developing an economy is the public education system.
However the literature found that Spain currently has one of the highest drop-out rates in
Europe, with 28.4% of students who have not earned the title of ESO. This high failure rate
at school is due to many young people leaving their studies during the housing boom,
attracted by high wages from the construction sector. Additionally, the Spanish government
made education cuts amounting to 62.5% and 11.6% in scholarships and student grants
respectively. Financial support is no longer available to students who have not earned an
average of 6.5 in the academic year. In addition to an increase in tuition fees of 20%, it has
also led to an increase in the drop-out rate. Human capital and innovation are the pillars
that determine the productivity of an economy; without a good education system, there is
no quality human capital (Mengual, 2012).
48
The primary data identified that the Spanish education system is failing in
investment and lack of resources. It needs more teachers. Cuts in education will
demonstrably worsen the long-term outlook, having negative consequences on innovation
and the economy of the country. Besides, it has been demonstrated that the socio-
economic problems that exist in Spain hinder the academic success of some students. To
improve education, Spain needs a system that ensures the success of each student by
knowing each student's conditions and limitations in order to eradicate the inequality of
conditions, thus maximising development potential. In Spain there is little personal attention
from the teacher and the system does not produce students with critical thinking faculties.
Critical thinking is essential to create new ideas and products; people need to be critical
enough to identify that something does not work and create alternatives to improve it
through new, innovative ideas (Participant 1; Participant 2; Participant 4).
‘The average grade necessary to be a teacher in our country is of the lowest in the
world (6.5) so the profession is not valued and not seeking the best professionals
for such an important element in a society such as teaching’ (Participant 6 p.111).
‘It is not the same for a student from a rich family to prepare for an exam as a
student from a poor family; when you are poor, you do not have a whole room for
yourself to prepare your examination, your parents are not university graduates,
your family is not surrounded by books, you have not read since childhood and
teaching has not motivated you, with the knowledge that when you have a large
family, living in a flat of 60 square metres and having to share a room with three
brothers, you cannot afford a single book' (Participant 1, p.79).
Moreover, Spanish universities only teach the basics of each subject; they do not
teach students to think critically and be professional.
‘…groups should be minimised, as in England, with seminars of 12 people in order
to obtain personalised treatment. In Spain there is no personal attention from the
teacher so there is no interest in helping people to come out with critical thinking
and a good education’ (Participant 4 p.98).
4.3.4. Innovation system
The literature identified that the Spanish government undermines its system for
innovation; the introduction of the new Law on Science, Technology and Innovation in 2012
may be an important step forward to improve the Spanish innovation system, but recent
49
government cuts in R&D will have a negative effect in the short and long term on the
country's economy - as the literature demonstrated, the most innovative countries have
high levels of productivity as well as more sustainable economic growth. Spanish spending
on R&D is below 1.39% of GDP, one of the lowest figures in the Eurozone, where average
R&D expenditure is more than 2% of GDP (Cotec, 2012).
Upon further questioning, participants suggested that Spain must base any
economic growth on innovative activities because the dearth of Spanish businesses in the
innovation sector is leads to poor national productivity. In addition, the government should
incentivise companies, as most countries in northern Europe offer businesses tax breaks if
they invest in R&D. With the delicate economic situation facing the country, businesses
believe it is unwise to invest in R&D; with the uncertain future, they do not want to take
risks until the economic situation improves. Perhaps, during the boom times, there were
insufficient incentives for companies to invest (Participant 5). The Spanish government
should support innovation in renewable energies – in particular solar power, because the
country enjoys the most hours of sunshine in Europe; it is inexplicable that countries such
as Norway have more solar panels that Spain, and that the Community of Madrid has
recently prohibited the installation of solar panels in certain buildings. Once again, this is
just for the benefit of the largest power enterprises (Participant 1).
‘I do not know what the tax situation is in Spain but most countries in the world offer
businesses tax breaks if they invest in R&D. […] Another important thing is of
course are businesses only tend to invest in those things (R%D) if the economy is
growing, or if they perceive the future economy to be expanding’ (Participant 5
p.105).
4.3.5. Banking system
The findings of the literature and primary data contained insignificant contradictions
based on the theory that SMEs constitute 99% of Spanish firms. They are the companies
that create more jobs and provide better conditions for their workers. Today, SMEs do not
have access to liquidity; the impact on access to credit is severely damaging the country's
economy. For this reason, the authorities should support SMEs by restoring credit - the
sooner, the better. Private banks use the assets granted by the EU for their own
restoration, leaving SMEs devoid of the credit required for their development. This is
hurting the Spanish domestic market, the health of which is crucial in overcoming the
uncertainty experienced by the country (Torres, 2010). The ECB has been subjected to
private banks' interests and cannot be considered a public bank, as it has no ability to lend
50
to states they lend to private banks at a 1% interest rate, and to governments or private
firms at a minimum interest rate of 5%. It engages in buying the public debt of countries in
crisis, with the assurance that debt will be paid without any risk for them, rather than
looking after the interests of the citizenship and granting loans at low interest rates solely
for the economic benefit of the citizens (Gay de Liébana, 2012).
For this reason, the results of the primary data emphasised that in order for SMEs
to have more financial support, it is necessary to create a public bank to ensure the viability
of credit to households and businesses that are weaker and are more vulnerable. As
private banks are not motivated to help SMEs and leave them deprived of the necessary
credit for their development, it was important to highlight that the authorities should build a
public bank to fulfil this purpose (Participant 1). Also, a more flexible tax system should be
created, depending on the annual profit of the firms themselves; large companies cannot
receive more tax benefits than small family enterprises.
‘…at the moment banks are reluctant to lend but that will change. Moving credit
from banks to businesses is a problem all countries have faced in the last few
years, as banks do not have enough money to lend: that’s why it is called a credit
crunch. But as I said, that will change as banks improve their balance sheets’
(Participant 5 p.106).
4.4. Conclusion This chapter concluded the presentation of a series of results, which ranged from
the triggers of the economic crisis to an analytical discussion of the fundamental pillars that
Spain should enhance in order to acquire sustainable economic growth, and become more
globally competitive. The following chapter focuses on the author's conclusions, which
were reached after an analysis of the results obtained in this study from both the literature
review and the primary data.
52
5. Introduction Presented below are the main themes of the research, referring to the questions
raised in the introductory chapter:
1) The triggers of the Spanish economic crisis
2) Austerity measures, or financial recovery through Keynes´s theories
3) Ending the crisis by improving Spain’s competitiveness
In addition, this chapter provides a series of recommendations as alternatives for
economic growth, which would be sustainable and democratic.
5.1. The triggers of the Spanish economic crisis Everyday, Spanish citizens question what triggered the economic crisis that has
afflicted the country since 2008. The crisis has engendered an unemployment rate of
6,202,700 million (27.16%). This high level of unemployment can often benefit large
companies because citizens must accept working conditions imposed on them or risk
losing their jobs. Of most concern is youth unemployment, which stands at 55.9%. This is
causing a brain drain, as young talent emigrates to seek job opportunities abroad.
This study demonstrates that the backbone of the crisis was speculation by financial
institutions, creating a housing bubble through subprime mortgages; these mortgages
attracted borrowers who could not obtain credit elsewhere as they were considered high
risk. Such bubbles are a collective failure to address the risks. This fuelled the US housing
bubble. Interest rates at that time were low, prompting high demand for subprime
mortgages and causing house prices to increase until the banks lost their liquidity and the
bubble burst - instigating a global crisis.
This property speculation was encouraged by a capitalist system in which people
took on unsustainable levels of personal debt. This is having dramatic social consequences
in Spain: more than 400,000 evictions were caused by the banks' recklessness. Banks
were granting house loans above the real value of the home; now, many contend that
citizens lived beyond their means, when in fact the highest Spanish debt is held by private
banks and public administrations. During the housing boom in Spain, 750,000 houses were
built each year. The revaluation of the houses during the real estate boom was 191%. The
real estate sector employed an average of 13.3% of the total workforce, meaning wages in
the economy rose. However, firms did not invest in improving their productivity levels, so
53
when the bubble burst, there were relatively high wages and low levels of productivity.
Businesses began to lay off workers.
5.2. Austerity measures, or financial recovery through Keynes’s theories Institutional rules and regulations are crucially important in creating wealth in a
nation. By signing the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, Spain accepted the weaknesses of
belonging to a European Community with a single currency. It was high risk because the
EC countries were very different, socially and economically. A neoliberal system has been
imposed, where political institutions decide several kinds of measures to benefit the largest
companies and finance capital firms.
The EU was constructed without sufficiently strong democratic instruments. An
example is the creation of the ECB. The ECB is subject to the interest of private banks; it is
not a public bank, as it has no ability to issue its own debt. Moreover, it is not capable of
lending to the states but is able to lend to private banks, so the banks can buy the public
debt of countries in crisis instead of tending to the interests of SMEs.
These institutions are imposing austerity measures on Spain to ensure payment of
debt to private banks (debt which should be audited, because arguably, a large part is
illegitimate and citizens should not pay for it). According to Levinas (1940 cited in Marrewijk
2003, p. 98), ’freedom stops when it interferes with the freedom of others’. This could be
believed with societies acting as markets, but not markets posing as societies, because it is
a big issue. These austerity measures, imposed by the authorities, are dismantling the
Spanish welfare state: the public administrations most affected are health and education.
They are also reducing workers' wages and increasing taxes. These austerity measures do
not guarantee the end of the crisis, but will increase Spain´s current 20% poverty level.
This is what Marx (1978) called 'surplus values', where large entities become richer by
exploiting the working class and the concentration of capital is in a few hands.
The priority of these economic policies links to the problems of deficit and public
debt, and Spain is obliged to comply with austerity measures imposed by EU. It is
noteworthy that other countries in northern Europe, such as Germany, do not suffer high
unemployment - these austerity measures do not cause so much damage to these northern
countries. For an optimal Euro currency zone, all countries involved should have a similar
macroeconomic position with regards to inflation, public debt and public deficit, which is not
the case today.
54
Spain should do the opposite to combat unemployment because under these
austerity measures, people do not buy and manufacturers do not sell, so demand reduces,
the number of firms entering bankruptcy increases, and unemployment rises. Spain has led
with these austerity measures for about three years - data indicates that the situation is
worsening.
The results of this study demonstrate that an alternative way out of the crisis would
be to increase the minimum wage, to increase income demand and domestic consumption.
In addition, a significant tax reduction would increase public spending and public
employment - this would increase demand and reduce unemployment. History shows too
that the best way out of crisis is by printing more money, which would have a positive
impact on exports. Unfortunately the EU does not practice this policy of devaluing currency,
in order to keep the Euro strong. The peripheral European countries will increase the
numbers of unemployed and poverty amongst EU citizens. Economic theory claims that
with high unemployment, when resources are underutilized government must improve
through fiscal or monetary policy or through a good combination of both. Economic theory
gives a way to minimise the suffering of citizens in times of crisis and Spain is doing just
the opposite.
5.3. Ending the crisis by improving Spain’s competitiveness Spain needs to improve its competitiveness to recover from the crisis. There are
two ways to be competitive: either with low wages or by increasing productivity. Spain must
choose the second option. With the introduction of the Euro, Spain is no longer a cheap
country. Competitiveness is complex - its most important pillar is education, because we
need a bigger pool of skilled human capital. The development of human capital is crucial to
productivity, which is why Spain should improve its education system by levelling the
playing field amongst students through more one-on-one teacher attention, increasing
resources and creating an education system that produces students who will generate new
and innovative ideas.
The poor Spanish productivity level is due to a lack of innovative ideas and lack of
investment in new technology. In the era of knowledge, competitive advantages are
generated by the innovation and creativity of human capital; competitiveness also improves
living standards in the country.
The government should encourage businesses through tax breaks, if companies
invest in R&D. Both companies and the government failed to invest in these sectors in
55
recent years, which is why the consequences of the crisis have been more apparent in
Spain than in many other EU countries. There should also be reform to facilitate
entrepreneurs to open and operate with more flexibility. In Spain it is very difficult to open a
business. For instance, when a company wants to register its firm, it costs money. This
could be made free. Another option is, if the revenue is below 10,000 Euro per year, the
company should not pay taxes. Facilitating SME's access to credit is vital, because SMEs
will extricate Spain from this uncomfortable situation. The wealth of a nation comes from
the knowledge of how to manage these pillars in the most efficient manner possible.
5.4. Recommendations To solve the economic issues in Spain, the country needs to address numerous
changes in areas such as: businesses, the public sector, banking, innovation, labour
market and education, which are the main pillars for a successful modern economy, global
competitiveness and long-term sustainable economic model.
Table 6: Recommendations
§ The EU should make the Maastricht criteria more flexible and alter its fiscal and
monetary measures to support economic incentives and job creation through the
Keynesian model, and not through austerity measures, which are worsening the
economic situation in Spain and other southern European countries.
§ This research demonstrates that Spain`s huge public debt is unsustainable. Public
debt has increased excessively in recent years and some of it due to the Maastricht
Treaty, which does not allow the ECB to lend money directly to EU states.
Furthermore, the ECB lends money to private banks at an interest rate of 1%, who
in turn lend to states at 5% or 7% of interest rate. This is why Spain is paying
around €30 billion in interest each year. It would be highly recommended that the
ECB be enabled to lend directly to states; Spain would then pay only around €6
billion annually on interest from its debt, preventing the growth of public debt. Other
European countries would also benefit from this reform.
§ To improve competitiveness and productivity, businesses must improve their
internal structures, environment, production methods and skills development. Spain
should invest in sectors with higher added value, to adjust its competitiveness to
their current allocations of resources and costs. To advance in this way requires the
56
intensive use of new technologies and proper training of workers - production
problems often stem from low technological capabilities and lack of skilled workers.
§ The slow progress of labour productivity compared to wage growth has increased
unit labour costs, and reduced competitiveness - that is why investing in new
technologies and knowledge-based economic model is essential to avoid reducing
citizens wages and decreasing domestic demand.
§ The lack of high-tech facilities and advanced processes is the cause of a poor
productivity and lack of competitiveness in the nation. The institutions create the
rules of the game; these rules could help the country gain a competitive advantage.
Therefore it is recommended that the Spanish government should encourage
companies to invest in innovation and research, via tax breaks to those who invest
in these sectors. This would have a positive effect on Spanish productivity because
the best way to improve productivity is through innovation and technological
components. It also ensures that firms gain competitive advantages over their
competitors. The government should increase expenditure on R&D, as Spain has
one of the lowest budgets of the OECD countries. It should also increase
investment in research projects to prevent brain drain of skilled human capital e.g.
engineers, biologists, and chemists etc., essential to wealth creation. Supporting
economic growth in knowledge, innovation and research delivers a sustainable
long-term economic model.
§ The structural deficiencies of the education system have a negative impact on
national competitiveness. This study emphasises the problems of efficiency in the
education system, lack of resources, lack of knowledge acquired by students and
early school drop-out. The problem in Spain is that the austerity measures and
education cuts are obstructing development of skilled human capital. Spain needs
to increase resources in the education system with more and better teachers.
Creating an educational system, which develops students´ skills and enables them
to implement their ideas, is crucial.
§ The economic situation of many Spanish families means many cannot cope with the
increase in university tuition fees. According to this study, it could lead to a 20%
drop-out rate in the universities next year. One recommendation is to implement a
system similar to the English student loans system, where students access loans
57
for higher education courses. Students only repay these loans when they graduate
and their income is high enough to the repay the debt. This arguably gives all young
people from modest socioeconomic backgrounds equal opportunities to enter
university. The interest rate of these loans is linked to inflation, so in real terms the
student is returning a figure similar to the amount borrowed.
§ The IMF believes that Spain is progressing well with its new labour market reform.
However, the labour market reform has yet to fully yield its fruits because it has not
been able to reduce unemployment. Most jobs generated so far are temporary, and
often in low-productivity sectors. Authorities should implement further labour reform
to increase permanent and stable contracts.
§ Without doubt the biggest issue for the Spanish government is the high rate of
youth unemployment. The government should aim to reduce this figure by
encouraging companies with business tax breaks if they offer permanent contracts
to 18-30 year olds. Additionally, the government should provide more public
employment for unemployed youths.
§ Spain needs a banking system that can finance sustainable economic growth. The
main problems to be solved are: to improve the supervision and regulation of the
financial system, clean-up of distressed assets, strengthening solvency levels and
the prohibition of the financial speculation practices through a reform of the Spanish
financial system.
§ Data from this study indicate that banks have tightened access to credit for SMEs
and this is the most urgent problem to be solved in Spain. SMEs create more jobs
and therefore authorities musk support them.
§ The nationalisation of public banks is vital to ensure credit for households and
SMEs, the main drivers of the Spanish economy. Private companies must have
direct access to credit to continue growing.
58
5.5. Limitations There were a number of limitations and challenges in the research: one limitation
posed by the qualitative approach was the sample was formed by a small number of
participants,. Consequently, results are difficult to generalise and may not fully represent
Spain's economic crisis and its competitiveness. However, the literature review and primary
data provide valuable information about the causes of the Spanish economic crisis and
potential solutions via the main pillars of competitiveness. Another factor that could have
hindered the potential quality of the data is that the author had limited prior experience in
qualitative research. With more experience, the research could have aided performance of
the participants, enriching the data obtained.
Due to the complexity and scale of the topic, the interview data do not give
comprehensive direct access to the situation and the issues behind Spain´s crisis.
Moreover, there could be a disconnect between the data collected and the study
objectives. In designing the research process, the researcher contacted representatives of
the governing People’s Party (PP), who declined to participate. Likewise, a number of key
Spanish liberal economists were unable to participate due to their busy schedule. However,
this qualitative study indicates a high degree of validity as the results reflect the real
situation in Spain and the interviews are transcribed verbatim prove that the information
was not manipulated by the author (Bell 2005; Biggam 2011; Coffey and Atkinson 1996;
Denzin and Lincoln 2013).
5.6. Scope for further research The case study of this research gives future readers a better perspective of the
current economic crisis in Spain. The case of the Spanish economic crisis is on-going, so it
is difficult to make an effective critique of the situation. It would be interesting to repeat this
research within a few years, interviewing, if possible, the same participants to discover if
they hold the same views on the economic crisis. Quantitative data could be obtained via
questionnaires distributed to Spanish citizens to identify whether their opinions match the
results obtained in this study.
This study raises several hypotheses that in the future would be worthy of
investigation. Firstly, the impact that the austerity measures will have on the long-term of
the country, both socially and economically. Another possibility of serious interest is
whether the peripheral European countries could create a counter to the EU, by auditing
the debts of these countries and refusing to pay the parts of the debts that are illegitimate.
Finally, investigating whether a Euro exit would be a viable decision; or perhaps a chance
59
to create two types of Euro, at a different speed in the southern countries where there are
greater economic problems. They could devalue their currency and deal with the crisis.
Logically it would create two, very different Europe’s: the rich and the poor.
60
References
Anguita, J., 2012. Combates De Este Tiempo Sixth edit., Cordoba: El Páramo.
Arellano, M. and Bentolila, S., 2009. ¿Quién es responsable de la burbuja inmobiliaria? El Pais. Available at: http://elpais.com/diario/2009/02/22/negocio/1235312065_850215.html [Accessed July 9, 2013].
Atkinson, P. and Hammersley, M., 2007. Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Third edit., New York: Routledge.
Balcázar, P.. . et al., 2005. Investigación Cualitativa, Toluca: Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico.
Barney, J., 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp.99–120.
BBC, 2012. EU austerity drive country by country. BBC. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10162176 [Accessed July 9, 2013].
Bell, J., 2005. Doing your Research Project: A guide for first-time researchers in education, health and social science Fourth edi., Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
Benoit, A. and Ichikura, H., 2014. Spanish Exports Mark Record Year as Rajoy Craves Repeat. Bloomberg. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-21/spanish-exports-mark-record-year-as-rajoy-craves-repeat.html [Accessed March 10, 2014].
Biggam, J., 2011. Succeeding with your Master’s Dissertation: A step-by-step handbook Second edi., Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.
Blankenship, D.C., 2010. Applied Research and Evaluation Methods in Recreation, Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Blumer, H., 1969. Symbolic Interactionism, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
BOE, 2012. Boletín oficial del estado, Spain: Boletín Oficial del Estado. Available at: http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2012/07/07/pdfs/BOE-A-2012-9110.pdf [Accessed July 9, 2013].
Buck, T., 2013. EU court strikes down Spain’s eviction law. The Financial Times. Available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/16e37aca-8ca5-11e2-8ee0-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2SWxCVJL8 [Accessed May 6, 2013].
Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P., 1996. Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A., 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures of developing grounded theory Third edit., London: SAGE Publications Inc.
61
Cotec, 2012. Informe Cotec 2012, Madrid. Available at: https://www.ulpgc.es/hege/almacen/download/7103/7103236/informe_cotec_2012.pdf [Accessed July 9, 2013].
Cupchik, G., 2001. Constructivist Realism : An Ontology That Encompasses Positivist and Constructivist Approaches to the Social Sciences. Qualitative Social Research Sozialforschung, 2(1).
Denscombe, M., 2003. The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research projects Second edi., Philadelphia: McGraw-Hill.
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., 2013. Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry Fourth edi., London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Drucker, P., 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship, London: Heinemann.
ECB, 2014. Monthly Bulletin March, Frankfurt [Accessed March 9, 2014].
Eisenhardt, K.M. and Martin, J.A., 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal., 2, pp.1105–1121.
European Commission, 2012. Economic and monetary union and the euro, Luxembourg. Available at: http://europa.eu/pol/emu/flipbook/en/files/economic_and_monetary_union_and_the_euro_en.pdf [Accessed May 5, 2013].
European Commission, 2013. March 2013: Euro area unemployment rate at 12.1% EU27 at 10.9%. Eurostat: news-release euro-indicators. Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/3-30042013-BP/EN/3-30042013-BP-EN.PDF [Accessed May 5, 2013].
Fink, G. and Salvatore, D., 1999. Benefits and Costs of European Economic and Monetary Union. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, VI(2), pp.187–194.
Freimuth, H., 2009. Educational Research: An Introduction to Basic Concepts and Terminoloty. UGRU Journal, 8, pp.1–11.
Friedman, M., 1980. Free To Choose, London: Martin Secker & Warburg Limited.
García, F.P., 2011. Crecimiento y competitividad: Trayectoria y perspectivas de la economía española, Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.
Gay de Liébana, J.M., 2012. España se escribe con E de endeudamiento: radiografía de un país abocado al abismo, Barcelona: Deusto.
Grant, R.M., 2005. Contemporary Strategy Analysis Fifth Edit., Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Greenfield, T., 1996. Research Methods: guidance for postgraduates, London: Arnold.
Guest, G., Namey, E.E. and Mitchell, M.L., 2013. Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
62
Gutierrez, P.M., 2013. Explorador del paro en España según la EPA (Encuesta de población activa). lainformacion.com. Available at: http://graficos.lainformacion.com/economia-negocios-y-finanzas/agencias-de-empleo/explorador-del-paro-en-espana-segun-la-epa-encuesta-de-poblacion-activa_9CAFyDSdNadFLSJWPPVDc6 [Accessed July 12, 2013].
Hammersley, M. and Traianou, A., 2012. Ethics in Qualitative Research: controversies and contexts, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Holloway, I., 2003. Qualitative Research in Health Care, Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
IMF, 2013. Spain: 2013 Article IV Consultation, Washington [Accessed March 19, 2014]..
INE, 2013a. Economically Active Population Survey (EAPS) First quarter of 2013. Press Releases: National Statistics Institute, pp.1–22. Available at: http://www.ine.es/en/daco/daco42/daco4211/epa0113_en.pdf [Accessed May 5, 2013].
INE, 2013b. National Statistics Institute. Available at: http://www.ine.es/ss/Satellite?pagename=INEHome/HOMELayout&L=1 [Accessed May 5, 2013].
Informacion, 2013. España presiona para que la UE facilite financiar a pymes. Informacion. Available at: http://www.diarioinformacion.com/economia/2013/07/09/ecofin-busca-formulas-financiar-pymes/1393691.html [Accessed July 14, 2013].
Institute of Tourism Studies, 2013. Tourism Highlights. Institute of Tourism Studies. Available at: http://www.iet.tourspain.es/en-en/estadisticas/fichadecoyuntura/paginas/default.aspx [Accessed July 8, 2013].
Jiménez, M. and Mars, A., 2013. La deuda pública de España crece al mayor ritmo de la historia. El Pais. Available at: http://economia.elpais.com/economia/2013/02/16/actualidad/1361043416_187573.html [Accessed July 9, 2013].
Klenke, K., 2008. Qualitative Research in the Study of Leadership, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Knack, S. and Keefer, P., 1997. Does social capital have an economic payoff? a cross-country investigations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), pp.1251–1288.
Krugman, P., 2009. How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? The New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 [Accessed July 9, 2013].
Kumar, R., 2005. Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Marschan-Piekkari, R. and Welch, C., 2004. Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Marx, K., 1978. Capital: a critique of political economy. Volume II, London: Penguin Books Ltd.
63
Mattick, P., 1971. Marx and Keynes: The Limits of the Mixed Economic, London: The Merlin Press.
Maxwell, J.A., 2005. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach Second Edi., London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Mengual, E., 2012. “Los recortes expulsarán a mucha gente de la universidad.” El Mundo. Available at: http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2012/05/18/espana/1337353048.html [Accessed July 9, 2013].
Merriam, S.B., 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation Second edi., San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
Merrian, S.B., 1988. Case study research in education: A qualitative approach, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Ministry of Economic and Competitiveness, 2012. Lanour Market Reform, February 2012, Spain: Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. Available at: http://www.thespanisheconomy.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/en-gb/Economic Policy Measures/120517 labour market reform, brief description.pdf [Accessed July 5, 2013].
Monastiriotis, V., 2011. The Greek crisis in focus : Austerity , Recession and paths to Recovery Edited by Vassilis Monastiriotis Special Issue, London.
Moore, N., 2000. How to do research: the complete guide to designing and managing research projects Third edit., London: Library Association Publishing.
Morgan, D.L., 1997. Focus Group as Qualitative Research Second edi., London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Mudambi, R. and Navarra, P., 2003. Erratum to “Institutions and international business: a theoretical overview.” International Business Review, 12(1), p.133.
Murphy, E. et al., 1998. health technology assessment : Standing Group on Health Technology. Health Technology Assessment, 2(16), pp.1–275.
Naghi, M., 2005. Metodología de la Investigación Second edi., Mexico D.F: Limusa S.A.
Navarro, V., 2007. Neoliberalism, Globalization, and Inequalities: Consequences for Health and Quality of Life, New York: Baywood Publishing Company, Inc.
Neergaard, H. and Ulhoi, J.P., 2007. Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
North, D.C., 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OECD, 2012a. Employment and Labour Markets: Key Tables from OECD. OECD. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/average-annual-working-time_20752342-table8 [Accessed July 5, 2013].
64
OECD, 2012b. OECD Economic Surveys: Spain, Available at: http://www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/SPAIN2012OverviewFV.pdf [Accessed July 9, 2013].
Pain, E., 2012. Research Cuts Will Cause “Exodus” From Spain. Science Journal, 336(6078), pp.139–140.
Peteraf, M.A., 2007. The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), pp.179–191.
Porrit, J., 2007. Capitalism: As if the World Matters, London: Earthscan.
Porter, M.E., 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.
Porter, M.E., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review, 69(4), pp.71–91.
Ricardo, D., 1911. The principles of political economy and taxation - 1772-1823, London: J.M. Dent & Sons, Ltd.
Rowlands, B.H., 2005. Grounded in Practice : Using Interpretive Research to Build Theory. The Electonic Journal of Business Research Methodology, 3(1), pp.81–92.
Sala i Martin, X., 2011. Poverty and Competitiveness. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i28cRfsKD-o [Accessed May 5, 2013].
Sánchez, R., 2013. Rescate alemán a las pymes españolas. El Mundo. Available at: http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2013/07/04/economia/1372892775.html.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., 2009. Research Methods for Business Students Fifth edit., Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Schumpeter, J.A., 1934. The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Scott, D. and Morrison, M., 2005. Key Ideas in Educational Research, London: Continnum International Publishing Group.
Scott, D. and Usher, R., 2011. Research Education. Data Method and Theory in Educational Enquiry Second edi., London: Continnum International Publishing Group.
Scott, D. and Usher, R., 2002. Understanding Educational Research, London: Routledge.
Shankar, A. and Goulding, C., 2001. Interpretive consumer research: two more contributions to theory and practice. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 4(1), pp.7–16.
Silver, L. et al., 2013. The Essentials of Marketing Research Third edit., New York: Routledge.
Sim, J., 1998. Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(2), pp.345–352.
65
Smith, A., 1776. The wealth of nations; Books 1-3, London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Soler, P.. ., 2001. Investigacion de Mercados, Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Stake, R.. ., 1995. The Art of Case Study Research, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Stiglitz, J.E., 2012. The Price of Inequality, New York: Norton & Company Inc.
Taylor, B.J., Kermode, S. and Roberts, K.L., 2006. Research in Nursing and Health Care: Evidence for Practice Third edit., Melbourne: Thomson.
The Spanish Constitution, 1978. The Spanish Constitution. Available at: http://www.tribunalconstitucional.es/Lists/constPDF/ConstitucionINGLES.pdf [Accessed May 6, 2013].
Torres, J.L., 2010. La Crisis de las Hipotecas Basura, ¿Por qué se cayó todo y no se ha hundido nada?, Madrid: Sequitur.
Tracy, S.J., 2013. Qualitative Research Methods, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Valera, M., 2012. Más de 300000 españoles emigran por culpa de la crisis. La Razon. Available at: http://www.larazon.es/detalle_hemeroteca/noticias/LA_RAZON_429092/3841-mas-de-300-000-espanoles-han-emigrado-en-busca-de-trabajo-desde-el-inicio-de-la-crisis#.UYeKECt36A0 [Accessed July 2, 2013].
Vazquez, L.N. et al., 2006. Introducción a las tecnicas cualitativas de investigacion aplicadas en salud, Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
WEF, 2013. The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013, Geneva.
Weisbrot, M. and Montecino, J., 2010. Alternatives to Fiscal Austerity in Spain, Washington. Available at: http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/spain-2010-07.pdf [Accessed June 9, 2013].
White, R., 2004. Living An Extraordinary Life, Denver: Balance Point International.
Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P., 2006. Interpretation And Method: Empirical Research Methods And the Interpretive Turn, New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc.
Yin, R.K., 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods Fourth edi., London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Young, W., 1987. Interpreting Mr Keynes, Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Zollo, M. and Winter, S.G., 2002. Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), pp.339–351.
67
Appendix A
Royal Decree Law 3/2012
1. Collective bargaining and internal firm flexibility
· The reform aims at turning collective bargaining into an effective instrument for businesses to adapt their working conditions to the particular circumstances of the firm.
· Firm level collective agreements are given priority, so that regardless of what is agreed at a higher level, representatives of workers and the employer may reach an enterprise agreement that suits their specific needs better.
· The reform allows businesses opting out from higher-level collective agreements to better adapt to market conditions.
· To facilitate the bargaining process the reform terminates with the so called ultra activity of collective agreements (unlimited extension of agreements beyond expiration if a new agreement is not in place). The validity of an agreement beyond its expiration is limited to a maximum of two years (which will encourage negotiations).
· Companies will have more flexibility to adapt working conditions. The reform removes the classification system of workers by job category and generalizes the system of professional groups, thus facilitating worker’s adoption of new functions. It is also easier now for the employer to adjust the working conditions (including salaries, working hours and work schedule). It also allows suspending contracts as a temporary adjustment mechanism to falling demand.
· As a result of the higher flexibility, dismissals should turn into a last resort measure.
· The reform also fights absenteeism that may cause the company a significant economical and organizational cost: The law allowed for the employee´s dismissal when his absenteeism was above average. The reform eliminates the link between collective absenteeism and an individual decision of dismissal: from the reform on, individual absenteeism may lead to objective dismissal independently of the average level in the firm.
2. Favouring the effectiveness of the labour market and reducing duality
· Our labour market regulation will be closer to that of other market economies with greater labour market efficiency by clearly promoting permanent contracts reducing duality. More flexible dismissals are allowed for economic reasons, so that the costs of dismissals of temporary and permanent contracts approach.
· Duality will also be reduced as a consequence of the bigger flexibility of firms: as the adjustment to demand conditions can be made through the change in working conditions (including working hours and salaries) there are fewer incentives to maintain a high number of temporary workers to face potential necessary adjustments.
68
· Economic causes of redundancy are clarified and defined as a fall on sales or incomes for three consecutive months.· To reduce duality in the labour market the reform generalizes for all permanent contracts a compensation of 33 days per year worked with a maximum of 24 months in case of unfair dismissal (previously 45 days per year with a maximum of 42 months). Compensation for permanent contract termination in case of redundancies for objective reasons is established at 20 days per year worked with a maximum of 12 months.
· The reform opens the possibility of collective dismissals for organizations and entities in the public sector for economic, technical and organizational reasons. This measure aims at facilitating the downsizing of administrative structures.
3. Favouring permanent contracts
A new permanent contract for SMEs (companies with fewer than 50 employees) and self-employed workers is created. The main feature of this contract for entrepreneurs is that it includes a trial period of 1 year, and some fiscal benefits: reductions in the tax bill of 3,000 Euro when hiring the first employee; fiscal reduction of 50% of the unemployment benefits the employee was collecting when hiring an unemployed person; and a system of subsidies targeted at unemployed groups with special difficulties to join the labour market (young people, long-term unemployed).
4. Favouring workers employability
Aiming to reduce the high youth unemployment rate and mitigate the effects of early school dropout, the reform promotes the contract for training and learning: the age ceiling to be eligible for this contract rises to 30 and, after exhausting a training period in an activity, the employee may again use this type of contract in other sectors, thereby enhancing employability and allowing a second chance. In addition, it is now possible for firms to offer training in their own facilities if these fulfil the legal requirements form that purpose. The reform also acknowledges the right to time to train, in order to reduce the risk that the technological changes or other changes could result in the dismissal of workers. At the same time this strengthens the professional training of workers.
Finally, Temporary Employment Firms (ETTs), which have a wide network of offices distributed throughout the territory and experience in the labour market, are allowed to act as private employment agencies. The aim is to reduce the average employment search time spell and to improve the quality of matches so that workers find jobs better suited to their skills and business hire better prepared employees.
Source: Ministry of Economic and Competitiveness 2012.
69
Appendix B
Interviews – English version
Interview: Tania Sánchez Melero – Participant 1
(United Left (IU) representative. The IU is the third-largest Spanish political party. She is a
regular contributor to three of the most popular political debate programmes on Spanish
television: La Tuerka, La Sexta Noche and El Gato al Agua)
Question: What do you think were the triggers of the Spanish economic crisis?
Answer - An economic model based on speculation and therefore submission to
bank credit by both businesses and families. Obviously when that failed, because of the
U.S. bankruptcy, it was felt more harshly in Spain because it was the only productive sector
that was maintaining the growth levels we had achieved.
Question - So the idea that we have lived beyond our means is a lie?
Answer - No, what I believe is that this crisis is obviously an excuse to consolidates
a model of society, productivity and state, which is guided by neoliberalism, right? I
believe that in this country the debt was not an exaggeration in any case, not even
in those communities with the largest public and unsustainable debt. This is what
happens when it is decided the public should assume the debts of the banks to
ensure the continuing benefits of the situation; once you have mortgaged all the
properties in speculative projects there comes a situation of real public debt, and
the priority of paying off the bank debt has been absorbed by the public sector. That
is what has brought us to the situation where there is a lack of liquidity in the public
system at all levels. In the daily news we see there are very serious situations in the
municipalities, where they have to decide if they will revolt and decide not to pay the
debt that the government has imposed on them but instead pay the of salaries of
officials who, ultimately, provide the services that guarantee fundamental rights. In
short, it is a crisis of capitalism. As every other crisis, instead of being resolved it is
moved - so the financial crisis was moved from the private sector to the public
sector, with the debt being absorbed by public entities.
70
Question: So do you see the Spanish debt as unsustainable and that it should not be
paid?
Answer – What I think is that a serious audit obviously has to be carried out
regarding the debt as we are talking about the money from all the people, as they
are ultimately the ones who own the state. So the debt should be audited, and it
should be made public which part has been absorbed from the banks and which
part was government debt which had been absorbed in an irresponsible manner,
rather than in the public interest. These elements should not be paid.
Question: Would Spain face some negative consequences from Europe in the case of
defaulting on the debt?
Answer - Surely the problem with this situation is that a breakdown of discipline of
the TROIKA plan, as a reflection of the possibility of leaving the Euro, creates a
situation of uncertainty in any country that generates it. What is less uncertain is
that it is a guarantee of poverty amongst the social majority. This is what you have
to start to consider: you cannot support the imposition of the TROIKA when that
involves the general impoverishment of the population. One thing that must be said
at some point is that there are cases worldwide, throughout history, in which
countries have had debts removed when they have failed to pay; there have been
moratoriums, situations where decisions have gone against the interests of financial
entities and in favour of the citizens of each of these countries - and no state has
collapsed, not even Germany, when it decided to stop paying its debt after the world
wars; not even the Latin American nations have collapsed when they decided to
stop subjugating themselves to the dictates of the International Monetary Fund.
None of these nations have collapsed or disappeared from the planet, or have had
worse situations inflicted on their populations. On the contrary, it has stopped the
impoverishment of the population; and I think that is the right way, because there is
no other way. Because what is clear is that the way of the TROIKA is a widespread
impoverishment and you cannot continue to allow it.
Question: Ecuador recently conducted a debt audit and it went quite well. It is a good
example but Ecuador is not part of Europe or of any other community; therefore should
Spain leave Europe so its debt can be audited (meaning it should also leave the Euro)?
71
Answer -Spain should seek allies in southern Europe so it could rethink an easy
way out of European politics. I think this is what the country should do and the
perspective that the left-wing parties should take in the next European elections. I
think especially southern European countries should begin betting on a commitment
to the citizens who support left-wing options and who also support an alliance of all
nations, which would form a majority to change the rules of the game in Europe.
Europe is not immutable and even though it was built without any democratic tools
we should not lose hope of converting that idea into reality and start demanding that
European institutions not only be unidentified administrative bodies but should be
part of alliances between nations with democratic criteria, similar to other alliances,
like the Latin American countries. There are shared, respected interests but there
should be no loss of sovereignty and the economic decision-making capacity of
each member country. That is the path but a single country is not going to achieve
it, so they need to start to unifying speeches. There is a hegemonic discourse in
Europe, captained by Germany. We need to have a counter proposal to that
speech.
Question: So do you think the Latin countries of southern Europe should unite?
Answer - We have been allotted a peripheral role in Europe; therefore we are
doomed to our population having no more hope than to be the servants of the
richest nations in Europe. We have to stop and say that our citizens have the same
rights as the rest of Europe - we should provide a decent standard of living to our
citizens and that we will not allow this development model to continue.
Question: What about the austerity policies imposed by Europe? Are they agreeable
policies or do they undermine Spain’s welfare system?
Answer – They are agreeable depending on what the goals are. For the purpose
of those who have decided that the only possible market for large capital is service,
these agreed austerity measures are more or less part of the fundamental rights
which previously constituted the welfare state. Welfare has become a business for
insurers, health companies, educational companies and also a very quick way to
change the thinking, homogeny and civic culture of a continent. Anyone who
assumes that politics should be about ensuring collective welfare and equitable
distribution of power, and that the weak must be protected by governments, believe
that all the austerity measures taken are wrong because they do not guarantee
72
growth or offer conditions that will provide a solution to the crisis, in which the 20%
poverty Spain currently has needs to be reduced. There should not be a cycle
where these policies infringe fundamental rights just because people do not have a
job. You have to start thinking that wealth goes beyond enterprise and work. We
must begin to distribute the wealth of the country in order to ensure collective
welfare. All the economic measures that the government is taking do not accord
with breaking this cycle, and this is destroying the welfare state that had developed
in Spain's a brief history of democracy. Until the measures it was developing as
best it could.
Question: If memory serves me correctly, l do not think a country has ever overcome a
crisis with such cutting measures.
Answer - No, of course not.
Question: What are the effective steps to follow for electoral law reform, as we also have
a political crisis?
Answer - I believe that current electoral law does not represent the public's will.
There is a distribution of voting strata, which means that not all the votes are worth
the same, and makes the seats of political organisations require more democratic
support than others. We have presented many proposals. There are simple
solutions, such as to increase the number of deputies and offer the vote to
disenfranchised citizens; currently, the votes of provinces with fewer deputies - and
a system that tends more to the majority and leaves out the minority – loses these
votes like debris. Deputies could be assigned to these votes so they are not lost.
Another alternative is to change the provincial constituency model. This is an
instance that has disappeared from the daily life of Spanish administrations and
corresponds to the Franco era. Constituencies should be allocated to autonomous
regions as it relates more closely to the current institutional model. These measures
are valid for reform in a model that represents democracy and puts its citizens first.
However I think the crisis we are now in is both political and institutional and goes
further. I think that Spain experienced a democratic transition to a society gripped
by fear. The transition was agreed between political elites; even if there were many
elites, all were involved except the nationalists. Plus we have to remember the
Republicans. Despite all of them getting involved it was an agreement for transition
decided by the elites, simply because if these conditions were not met there was a
73
big chance it would have ended up being a model of dictatorship.
That meant a gripping situation amongst the population, where they had no say
about a transitional model where there was no alternative and where there was a
widespread desire to escape the black period of history that was the Franco era. I
think this has evolved; we have changed a lot, and we are a more democratic
society. We are politically mature and therefore, with United Left, we are proposing
a reconsideration of whether it is time to draft a new constitutional process in which
the involvement of the citizenry redefines the rules of the democratic game. The
election laws are an important discussion and we should not only talk about how to
distribute the representativeness but also mention commitment to transparency
regarding party funding. The things we are now seeing are dynamiting the good
work of democracy.
Question: I think with that you have answered the next question: Do you think these
measures would end the bipartisanship?
Answer – Yes, I think it would be much better. The bipartisanship in this country, in
my opinion, concerns not only the matter of the simple alternation of the two major
parties - meaning we have to think of electoral law reform so it accommodates other
options – the bipartisanship is also a way of perpetuation of an economic and social
model of development, where powerful figures who were not standing for elections
were sent, meaning large firms and financial markets have retained the economic
and political power of the country: the IBEX 35 companies and the banks. This
maintains the economic power of the elite, so you have to keep a close eye on
things because, in essence, it is the same as after the coup. After the transition the
parties were left with the economic power, therefore it has not been distributed
democratically and transferred to the people. That has to change: the two-party
saga is a way of perpetuating this, so bringing an end to the two-party saga would
be a way of expelling many of the dark secrets from the public sector.
Question: I was always told that the Spanish transition was a model example, but now I
can see it was not like that...
Answer - I think that in this country there has been a state policy regarding
memory. Many of the countries, which have experienced horrific dictatorships, have
constructed dignified political memories of those who fell for democracy, yet in this
country there has been a policy of forgetfulness and of exalting ridiculous figures. It
74
is doubtful these figures played a role for the benefit of all the citizens but rather that
they were serving personal interests. I think the Spanish transition was a process
that could probably not have been done in any other way, and now is not the time to
talk back to those who led it and were able to build democracy; but we must say
that circumstances have changed, and that it is one thing to recognize that there
was no other way to make that transition, and another thing is to take into account
that it was a model for a transition and that its protagonists have been heroes in the
history of this country. The heroes were those who fell defending the Republic and
this country needs its people to participate in a democratic model if we want to be
an advanced democracy where certain things do not happen.
Question: And what do we do about corruption? Would a transparency law be a solution in
fighting against political and economic corruption?
Answer - Corruption is not only a problem of individual morality - corruption is a
substantial element of capitalism. It is part of the system, and as long as there is no
control in the process of democratization in the economy and the parliament seats,
corruption will be around. There will be mischief whilst companies can donate and
receive public contracts without being asked for the details, and we keep talking
about a treasurer instead of talking about all the companies that have benefited
from public money without us knowing how much they have gained at our expense.
That will continue to happen. The transparency law would indeed be a breakthrough
but I believe it would act as a smokescreen rather than an exercise of open
information. We must change the culture of democracy of the country to advance on
the path of true transparency; it is not enough to change a law requiring more
disclosure of certain procedures, or requiring more knowledge on the part of the
population. We have to make an effort. The question is whether some people want
to, because people are involved in democracy and that is not just a transparency
law. We must make an effort to train our people, to give them an appreciation of
democracy. Certainly the transparency law could be a first step, and though I
sincerely believe it is being debated behind closed doors, it is not truly transparent.
Question: Is there any country that has a policy of transparency that is working properly?
England, for example?
Answer - I believe that the Nordic countries are moving towards that now. I do not
know if Norway has slightly more advanced legislation and I think there are
75
examples of some states that are moving forward. I do not have any specific results
with me of how they are being evaluated, but I think there is evidence that some
countries are better than us. In countries such as Germany, if they discover that
someone has falsified a CV they are automatically dismissed and have to leave
their office; here in Spain, we found that the president maintained a close
relationship with a confessed corrupt official at the time that he was on trial, and he
has not even gone to the parliament to explain their relationship.
Question: In England, the Minister of Transport goes to work by the metro, he is a good
example...
Answer – For sure. There is also a vital point to that, which is to break this culture
and idea that the leaders of a country are the elite, and that they are above the rest
of the public. I think this is another one of the failures of the democratic model -
when a democracy becomes not an expression of the will of its people but instead
sees someone temporarily representing the interests of the people. They become
an elite, which enjoys tremendous privileges, and conditions that far exceed the
needs of those who hold positions in public office. I think that obviously politicians
must have decent wages and facilities to perform their functions, but to then take
the leap and turn them into an elite? That is something that should never have
happened. It is an outrage that one cannot find the ministers of the current
administration - or the one before, or any time - dining in a common restaurant.
Instead they go to places where the bills are well above the minimum wage.
Question: What would be the reforms needed for the perfect tax system in Spain?
Answer - I believe there is data that shows what we should do. Technicians from
the treasury office, deputy inspectors and professional associations reported that
75% of tax fraud occurs in large companies, banks and multinationals, which
involves only 0.01% of the economic contribution of public funds and yet accounts
for 72% of the fraud. This is neither recognised nor resolved, so it is a priority for
any government to fight tax fraud in the areas in which it occurs most easily - that is
to say, large companies. A country where 85% of income tax revenue comes from
payroll productivity rather than capital, which is only taxed at 15%, is an outrage. I
think the ones that have more should pay more, especially those who are receiving
the wealth of the workers. Currently, it does not matter if a worker has his wages
taxed and has nothing left; yet a company is taxed on its economic activities and
76
thus avoids taxes from its investments. This scenario should end. Ultimately it is a
basic thing; it is a tax model with more direct than indirect tax and also a
progressive tax, which does not make sense because the situation we have in this
country is six million unemployed; 40% of young people unemployed; 20% of the
population in poverty and VAT rising, as it is a tax where we all pay the same,
whether we have an income of €100 or €100,000. Plus there is no major tax
change like the HNWIs and SICAV, the banking taxes and a number of tax reform
elements that have to go in line with fraud controls as you control production
income and wage income. Like when you do not declare part of your income you
get caught, likewise you have to control tax evasion and those who earn more
should pay more.
Question: The Spanish constitution also states that taxes should be progressive, right?
Answer - Well that is perhaps one of the problems that have arisen from the spirit
of the transition. We have a constitution that says the wealth of a country should be
divested to the welfare of the group; that collective interest must come before
private interests and public interests; that economic policy should ensure that
wealth is distributed. The constitution states that the right to housing is a
fundamental right, yet the government allows people to be ejected from their homes
and challenged before the constitutional court on their evictions (in Andalusia). The
constitution decrees that the government should defend families expelled from
houses rather than coming to the aid of the banks before the citizens, yet the
political parties effect change quickly and without public consultation papers
submitted to the whole constitution on the issue of debt, thus negating the first
article which says that Spain is a social and legal state. If we cannot have money to
be a social state then we are violating the constitution – after all this, which is when
the public decides that if this constitution is not worth it, let’s make alterations to it.
Thus it seems inadvisable that the socialist party has already designed and
proposed the implementation of an elite, constitutional amendment without the
contribution of the population. I believe that when a country has adhered to a
constitution that has not been enforced, a constituent process needs to occur, as is
happening in Latin America. It is not a problem if you have to change the rules of
the game, as this is the common project of societies that advance democratically.
77
Question: Should the minimum wage be raised? Spain has nearly the lowest wages in
Europe (€ 728). Also, would it be sustainable to raise the pensions with the instability we
have?
Answer – Regarding the pensions I think we on the left wing were wrong to allow a
debate as to whether pensions are sustainable or not. A society cannot permit or
consider abandoning the weaker population, the population that has been working
all their lives, trading and giving their labour to the wealth of the whole country. We
should not allow the notion of leaving them without income to be discussed or
raised as an option. If, right now, there are no funds for the pensions, it is not
because of how many pensioners there are, or what the retirement age is: the
problem is that we have little contributions because we have little employment. So
the priority must be to ensure that there is more work so more people are trading
and more large companies are listed. Regarding the minimum wage, the problem is
when governments decide to forget that the capitalist system is a system of
domination and exploitation, in which there is no fair exchange of contracts to
construct a work force - the powerful, who have the means of production, buy the
weak’s labour, so there is an unequal exchange. The public authorities can either
protect the weak or allow the powerful to take advantage of that situation. So of
course you have to raise the minimum wage and you have to recover the labour
relations policy in which the state protects the weaker half of that relationship and
ensures that fear cannot be exercised as a weapon, where people are willing to sell
their labour power at almost bargain prices. Because that is the problem: that large
employers hire for €400 by exploiting people, hiring illegally or making employees
work overtime then not paying them, because they are allowed to get away with it.
The workers do not fight because they cannot do it - they know that they are
vulnerable and that they can put their lives in danger. This is crazy and only a
government concerned with its citizens can change this relationship.
Question: The European Central Bank, Germany, the International Monetary Fund, say
that wages are too high in Spain because it is not a productive country. How can the
productivity of a country rise without having to drive down wages? There must be other
methods.
Answer – It is curious that those who designed the model of Europe, where we
have been allocated the role of Eurovegas across the continent, now tell us that we
are not productive because they have chosen to be. However they are productive
because they sell us low pay. What is impermissible is this unequal relationship in
78
which I take advantage of your conditions and force you to keep these conditions
because I will not assume that you are as productive as me. I think we need to
reconfigure this reality across the whole of Europe. Indeed I believe that we must
also begin to suggest that the European Central Bank is subject to private banking
interests and is not a public bank. The ECB has no ability to issue its own debt, is
not capable of providing to the states but instead lends to banks, only for those
banks to then lend with interest at 10 times the value of what are ultimately received
as rent. It is not a democratic institution and therefore not geared to distribute power
– and ultimately this is the value of democracy.
Question: Adam Smith said that human capital is essential for creating the wealth of a
nation. Spain has 28.4% school dropout, which is almost the highest in Europe. How do
you think we can improve this situation? Can the new law imposed by the PP improve it?
Or do you believe that these such negative statistics will not change?
Answer - The problem with the PP is its expression of neoliberalism, which is not
seen elsewhere in Europe. Its policies do not get to the roots of the problems. They
are used as objective data - 28% of school failure justifies reform that is not
touching on the reasons for that failure, because it has not even been analysed. If
we carefully study the same OECD report that ranks our school failure rate, the
main reason identified for school failure is inequality in terms of access and the
study conditions of the population; there is a brutal gap conditioned by the socio-
economic elements of the students and no intervention to bridge the gap. Mandela
said that education is the only tool the poor have to revolt against the powerful and
avoid being dominated; the problem is that the poor do not use that tool. The
Finnish model, which not only states that schools have to hit their goals but that the
system must guarantee successful individual students, involves knowing the
conditions of each student to reach the maximum development potential. This is not
being done in this country – there is no intervention regarding the inequalities
caused by an uneven playing field and on academic outcome. As long as we do not
act on this we will continue in the same manner. The model law being imposed by
the education minister, Jose-Ignacio Wert, is not going down that road but rather in
the opposite direction, by segregating students from the beginning and thus cutting
off those failing from those who are succeeding. I do not know if that will work better
with those who are not failing. I doubt it, but of course it will not produce
improvement in the results of those who are being abandoned, because now all it
does is abandon them earlier.
79
Question: The truth is I can identify with what you have said. I only studied in Spain at
EGB - my degree and my Masters I have done in England. I have hearing problems and so
I felt quite abandoned during my studies in Spain; I saw no help from the teachers. Plus my
family is from Granada; because of economic problems we moved to Mallorca, where they
speak Catalan. I had a hard time adjusting to the new language. The truth is that in my own
country it became much more difficult to study than in a foreign country like England.
Answer – Of course. The problem is not addressed. I am a social education
professional and as a graduate student in the late '90s I studied programmes which
started in the late '80's, with this idea of educational diversification - meeting the
special needs of both situations like yours, and with situations that have more to do
with family conditions. It is not the same for a student from a rich family to prepare
for an exam as a student from a poor family; when you are poor, you do not have a
whole room for yourself to prepare your examination, your parents are not university
graduates, your family is not surrounded by books, you have not read since
childhood and teaching has not motivated you, with the knowledge that when you
have a large family, living in a flat of 60 square metres and having to share a room
with three brothers, you cannot afford a single book them so you have to go to the
public library; if you study at the times you can; and if, on top of that, you have to
work part-time, because your parents cannot afford everything on their own and you
have to pay your college tuition (because there are scholarships which are even
more expensive); what it all means is that a person who has lower economic
conditions has to expend ten times more effort to achieve the same result. This
obviously is shameful in a democratic country.
Furthermore, education is something that had been discussed in the '80s. I repeat
that I am an educator by profession and when we studied this, we studied the
influence of socioeconomic and family conditions on academic performance and the
personal development of the individual in cognitive abilities. Of course there is a
great influence. Children of wealthy families, whose parents are college educators,
learn the simple act of reading long before less-favoured children because their
parents read newspapers regularly and books are normal them; so they motivate
their children, because they read them. A family where the parents are not
university educated and have no reading habit often does not motivate its children.
If we want a developed society we have to make up for the state - there is no other
way.
80
Question: Let us discuss the questionable efficiency of the labour reform imposed by the
current government. Spain had five million unemployed before the introduction of the
reform and currently the figure is over six million. Is it a failure? How would the labour
reform need to be improved to create jobs?
Answer - - The problem of the five labour reforms in this country which have come
from either the PP or the PSOE is that they continue to believe in the union
complaint that the laws create the labour market; it is not true. The labour market is
configured by the production system of a country, so when you have a production
system based solely on the brick, what you have is a production system based on a
precarious sector. All you can do about the labour laws of the production system is
ensure that although, for better or worse, the weaker part of the relationship is the
employee and all the reforms have failed to intervene in the production system, that
the laws protect the rights of the weak, which they have thus far failed to do. The
latter is an auction: I have come this morning from the courthouse of the Community
of Madrid, where all agreements have been suspended for now. It is chaos. The
employment relationship depends on the shift manager granting certain privileges
that were previously reflected in contracts. This is a public sector that had excellent
conditions: imagine the catering, mechanics, the doers, builders, drivers ... there is
an entire population that is unprotected. Your employer can do exactly what that
they want. It does not create jobs but destroys them. It is stupid to think that if we
make firing conditions more flexible it will produce work and will result in no more
layoffs. If it is cheaper I am going to lay off more staff; but I will hire more? No, I
have no need. I think it is crazy and we have to start again. However it is important
to stress that labour law should serve to defend the weaker party and create more
jobs, thus modifying the production system.
Question: In theory, private companies prove to be more efficient and effective than public
firms given the environment where they develop. What would be the reason for
nationalizing the strategic sectors?
Answer - I think so. I believe the fundamental key to improving the situation of the
southern European countries is that we have sovereignty; we currently have no
sovereignty because we have ceded it to Europe. This is clearly visible in the
economy; therefore we must regain the ability to make decisions about the
economy. The nationalized public banks should care about guaranteeing credit to
ensure the welfare of citizens through public investment, and ensure there is a
81
criterion that prioritises the interests of society against corporate profits, such as in
the case of financiers. In the case of energy it is much more important; it is not just
a question of what is necessary. In today's world we need access to energy for
decent living conditions; however there is another aspect, which is the
environmental impact generated by the production or extraction of certain energy
systems. Committing to one model or another is something we owe to future
generations. If a company has to think about what is in its best interest it is going to
think short term; a company does not care if there will be any benefits in the year
2050 because energy is a gamble. Therefore the strategic elements not only ensure
fundamental rights and the welfare of society, but also that production and energy
exploitation is sustainable according to criteria for future generations. I think in this
country it is a key thing. Why are there more solar panels in Norway than in Spain?
Here the daylight hours are much more productive. It is understood that there are
communities that have decided to invest in solar farms and clean energy
production; yet there is no change in Madrid because it has decided panels can be
installed only in certain buildings and at energy productivity rates. Anyone who
thinks that is a plan does not respond to the collective interest but in the interests of
large companies who want to keep doing strong business. Strategic sectors
therefore have to be in the hands of the state, because only the state can ensure
that what governs sectors' productivity and production is the interest of society and
not their owners.
Question - One last question. More than 99% of Spanish companies are SMEs, which
form the engine to maintain and create jobs. Private banks uses most of the assets
pledged by the European Community for their own benefit, leaving companies lacking the
credit necessary for their development. Should banks display more solidary with the SMEs,
or should a public bank be created for this purpose?
Answer - Certainly if there was a public bank, the priority would be to ensure the
viability of credit for families and businesses which create jobs, because they are
weaker and are the most vulnerable in this country. Actually, only 1.1% of taxed
companies are large companies: most are small businesses. That not only relates
to the subject of banking; you have to start gambling in sectors such as trade and
liberate small businesses. The delay in payments, and the number of companies
closing in Spain, is amazing. I think that the laws that have been initiated for
entrepreneurs and small businesses think too short term; we have to begin taking
very seriously the fact that these companies are those that actually produce the
82
largest number of jobs in this country. Therefore they need financial guarantees,
such as credit viability adapted to the conditions of small businesses and tax
systems relevant to the economic characteristics of each company. Large
companies should not enjoy more tax benefits than a small business which is
working really hard to move forward; for example, maybe a family which employs
two or three people. There are some who reach that level.
-Well, thank you very much. That will be all.
83
Interview: Juan Torres López – Participant 2
(Professor at the University of Seville in Department of Economic Theory and Political
Economy. Also, he is the author of over 15 books on economy)
Question: According to your point of view, what triggered the Spanish crisis?
Answer: Well, basically I think on the one hand it was the impact of the
international economic crisis and on the other hand, it was the crisis of a production
model based on the housing sector, where there was such a big bubble that finally
burst.
Question: Then do you think that we have lived beyond our means? Because that is what
they want us to believe.
Answer: No, I do not think so. That is just a very absurd way of speaking. It is just a
moral judgment, which makes people feel guilty.
Question: What is the correlation between the economic crisis and the Spanish political
and institutional crisis?
Answer: There has always been political crisis in Spain. It is just that the crisis also
generates a space of social confrontation because the different social groups have
different points of view. The dominant groups – by which I mean the groups with
more economic and financial power - are trying to impose an answer to the crisis.
This answer is very different from the preferences of society. These groups believe
that they need to ignore these preferences. But if they do this, they will be acting out
of their political representativeness. This is what triggered the democracy crisis we
are having.
Question: Is the Spanish debt legitimate and sustainable as its creditors claim? Should it
be renegotiated? Or should we stop paying it temporarily?
Answer: First of all, we should analyse it and see where it comes from. We need to
know if there are some reasons to repudiate it. I think that there are enough
reasons to do this. This proves that part of this debt is caused by the manipulation
of some markets and the speculators. But above all, the financial expense and the
interests could have been dedicated to this if the private banks had not enjoyed so
many privileges.
84
Question: Should an audit be done?
Answer: Exactly, one should be done.
Question: Would Spain have negative consequences imposed by Europe in the event of a
non-payment of debt?
Answer: Not by the EU, but yes by some creditors. However as long as there is a
purse there will is always be conflict, which will have consequences. The
speculators will want to do something about it. We need to negotiate an argument
and attain political and social strength.
Question: Would it be viable if Spain left the Euro zone?
Answer: Yes, it would be. But logically it would be very problematic. It would carry
many problems but any other social decisions would also carry a lot of problems.
Question: Regarding the austerity policies imposed by Europe: do you think they are
sensible measures or do they threaten the Spanish welfare state?
Answer: I think these measures benefit large financial groups or corporations.
These groups or corporations can dominate the governments. That is the way it is
at the moment and this is what we need to fight against. We need to get society to
impose its will.
Question: You have said on more than one occasion that a high unemployment rate
benefits the capitalist governments and big corporations. What is the basis of this
statement?
Answer: Unemployment, logically. This weakens the working classes. When
somebody is unemployed, the only thing that matters is finding a job, no matter the
conditions of the job. So companies can do whatever they want with employees.
Question: What would be an ideal tax system for future tax reform in Spain?
Answer: Well, actually there are no perfect policies. There are characteristics that
approximate certain social preferences. If you are a renter or a financial speculator
you will believe that the ideal tax system would be one which is not applicable to
capital income. If you are a worker, you will hope that the tax system is more
generous about your income. I think that the tax system is the result of the conflict
between the different social classes.
85
Question: Regarding wages, Spain has a minimum wage of 728 euros. It is nearly the
lowest wage in Europe. The same happens with the pensions. Would it be viable to
increase both?
Answer: It would be a solution to get out of this crisis. Spain has a problem with
domestic demand because our wages are very low. In order to end the crisis we
need to increase income and consumption. For this reason it is essential to
increase the minimum wage.
Question: The minimum inter-professional wage has decreased in the last few years, the
excuse being that Spain was not productive enough compared to Europe. How could Spain
be more productive without decreasing wages?
Answer: First the concept of productivity used in general for the whole economy is
absurd, because you have to apply it to different activities. A German hairdresser is
as productive as a Spanish hairdresser and I do not think that a German waiter is
more productive than a Spanish one. It has to be differentiated according with the
economic activities. What occurs is that some countries that have a greater
acquired amounts seems more productive because they have higher value added,
components of technology and innovation and therefore what should be done is to
increase the space in which these sectors occupy in the Spanish economy.
Question: Human capital is essential to create wealth in a nation, so it is necessary to
keep and develop the public education system. What would be the legal framework for the
reform of a deficient education system caused by high student failure in medium education
and the ineffectiveness of Spanish universities, which do not facilitate suitable work
insertion?
Answer: Failure in investment and resources, to be more successful. Keep in mind
that the Spanish educational system has in the last 30 years incorporated an
immense number of people. As many people have joined the educational it is
normal to have many difficulties. I think we really need more resources, more
attention, more professors and an environment of culture. Family and society also
influence educational success. That is why we have a 28% dropout.
86
Question: Let's discuss the efficiency of the current labour reform imposed by the current
Government. We know that Spain had five million people unemployed before this reform,
and yet today Spain has more than six million unemployed. Is this reform a failure? How
could this reform be improved in order to create employment?
Answer: It has been a success according to their plans: eliminate the rights and
the capacity of negotiation of the workers, and make it easier for the firms to fire
their workers.
Question: But they said this reform was intended to create more jobs, to make the country
more productive and competitive, did not they?
Answer: They already knew they were not going to achieve that.
Question: Private corporations are said to be more efficient and effective than public
corporations. What would it be the sense of nationalising the strategic sectors?
Answer: There are some sectors where it is unnecessary to see benefits but if
these kinds of sectors are successful in the private sector they should be successful
in the public sector too. In other words, these strategy sectors could be equally
effective or even more so if run by the government.
Question: More than 99% of Spanish corporations are SMEs, which create and keep jobs.
Should the banks be more supportive of them?
Answer: Well, SMEs create more jobs and therefore we must take care of them.
What happens now is that we actually mistreat the SMEs and do not allow them to
increase our domestic market, something that is critical to do. Indeed it is the SMEs
who require more support, and a much larger presence in the Spanish economy.
Question: Spain is said not to be a competitive country. What should we do to improve our
competitiveness?
Answer: The competitiveness is another concept absolutely lacking in rigour. It is
quite complex. If competitiveness is understood as the best ability to sell outside a
country’s borders, we suffer from cynicism, as the economy does not have to be
entirely geared towards the external market. In any case we can look at countries
that are more competitive in our environment such as Sweden, Denmark, and the
Netherlands. They are very competitive and we can see how they are working and
compare it with how we do. Then of course there are different ways of dealing with
competitiveness; it can be done through innovation, quality and other
87
competitiveness through the impoverishment of lower daily wages. Clearly that it
does not have the same result, right?
Question: Lately, the Minister of Economy has said that we are getting out of the crisis. Do
you think that this situation is going to improve in the short term?
Answer: No, I do not and I do not think the Minister does either. He is trying to
mislead people. He is been saying this for the last three or four years but it is not
related to what is currently happening, believe me.
Question: How long is this crisis going to last? It seems any figure indicates that more or
less, the crisis will continue.
Answer: We are still in crisis. However the most important thing is not when we get
out of it, but how?
88
Interview: Javier Fernández Cruz – Participant 3
(Member of 15M Movement, which aims to show discontent with Spanish politicians and
their economic measures)
Question: What are the most relevant 15M ideas?
Answer: The principal idea is the motto that appeared during the demonstrations,
which is that is that we are not just merchandise in the hands of politicians or
bankers. This was the implicit proposition of political bipartisanism in the hands of
the bank.
Question: What are the triggers of the economic crisis in Spain?
Answer: In my opinion, the crisis comes from further back than we think. The crisis
of values came from Spain's leap into a finance-based economy, the debt, the real
estate bubble, etc. I believe it comes from having a finance-based economy, a crisis
of capitalism itself.
Question: Is it then false that we have been living beyond our means?
Answer: Not really. If you do not earn enough money, if you have not got a decent
salary to be able to afford basic needs, such as a house, or to go on holiday ten
days a year. Some may have been, but the majority of people have not. If your
salary is not good enough to afford the basic cost of living, then you end up needing
to ask for credit. Once this happens, your salary belongs to the bank: the facts are
there.
Question: Is the Spanish debt legitimate and sustainable, as creditors claim, or should it
be renegotiated and payments suspended for a certain period of time?
Answer: What I believe, first of all, is that a large part of the debt is illegitimate.
Secondly, the debt does not belong to the Spanish people: it belongs to private
companies who have been gambling with the money. You cannot declare the profit
is private but the debt is public. Thus most of the debt that Spain has as a country,
as a nation, is not legitimate because it belongs to different financial organisations.
From my point of view, this debt should be declared illegitimate and not be paid.
89
Question: What would the negative consequences imposed by Europe be, in case the
debt went unpaid? Would the damage done by non-payment be less harmful to the
recovery of the country's economy?
Answer: This is more proof of the lack of democratic practice and transparency in
the European Union. We are in the European Parliament, which is hardly
representative in itself, and where Spain wields only an average influence; in
addition to this, most laws are made for and backed by private companies. This
situation implies a total lack of democratic practice in the EU. We need another EU -
this one is not good enough for us. We could either leave it or change it, but what
we have now is not worth staying in. A European society with all the problems we
are experiencing - from the Greeks, who are starting to fail again, always wobbling,
to the Germans - where regular citizens are deprived of their democratic practices,
because we are ruled by large corporations. I am not an economist; although
economists do also claim they do not want this EU that the existing state is
uncontrollable with what there is in the EU - for example Norway or Sweden.
Europe is a relatively recent thing.
Question: Regarding the austerity measures, are they a good choice or do they threaten
the Spanish welfare system?
Answer: I am personally against them. Firstly, because these measures are
affecting the lives of the majority of the population. Secondly, because they are
completely unfair and show there is a hidden agenda relating to privatisation of
welfare. That is a political decision.
Spain has one of the most efficient, low cost healthcare systems in Europe
compared to the much-praised North American private healthcare system; we have
better care and longer life expectancy. The cutbacks are already taking a toll on a
life expectancy that is already decreasing, with a rise in mortality. This is because
people sometimes cannot afford basic treatment when they have to choose
between food and prescriptions. We are not allowed to choose what drugs we buy;
not even as final consumers. However hospitals cannot decide either, as their
decision-making power has been diminished to the point of deciding which
minimum needs to be met first. Then there are the taxes. There are certain
companies who have tight bonds with some members of the current government.
These are things that showcase how political, rather than economic, certain
decisions are.
90
Question: What would be the most effective steps for a reform of the electoral law?
Answer: Well I do not know, there is where we want to end the game, where we
want to have our say in the type of state we want, the type of Europe we want and
the measures necessary to prevent a situation like this from happening again. What
we definitely do not want is a president of the Constitutional Tribunal who is a
member of a political party. We cannot have this nonsense of false independence of
powers.
Neither can we have a EU that is at the total service of corporations. It is perfectly
clear that all the members of the former executives have ended up working for
energy supply companies. What all Spaniards pay for most is the electricity bill, the
made-up debts of the electricity companies. This proves that we need to establish
new rules for the game. I do not know, I am not a communist but I do believe that
we need to see something that overcomes the finance-based economy and works
with a real economy, as the current economic system is based on creating money
out of thin air. This system gives away large amounts to everybody and in the end
there are large corporations sucking money from the public system, money we all
own. When a public company has profits, these do not come back to us in terms of
shares, they have a repercussion on the things that we all can benefit from. I am not
saying all companies should be public, but what is being done right now means that
money is taken away from the public system to give it to the ones who already have
a lot of money. I believe that a substitutive process is needed, and from that point
onwards it will be decided what Spain and EU we want.
Questions: What would the 'perfect' electoral system be, as opposed to the current
bipartisanism?
Answer: Well, I think it is urgent that not only a transparency law is created but also
that corruption rights do not prescribe. Anybody involved in a court process should
be suspended; for appearances of honesty the suggestion should come from the
own person, but the law should enforce it if that it is not the case. Instead what we
have now is effective impunity.
Currently both the majority parties, PP and PSOE, are currently experiencing record
low levels of popularity. I do not know what is going to happen or who will rise next,
but the electoral system benefits these two parties and is currently exhausted.
91
Question: What measures should a new transparency law include to fight political and
economic corruption?
Answer: A body of dedicated inspectors to conduct serious prosecution of large
companies, as the majority of tax evasion and corruption occurs in large
companies. Fiscal fraud being prosecuted would result in more money, which would
help across all areas. However, what is happening now is that this fight does not
seem to be convenient for a few.
Question: Would this help to maintain the pensions scheme, which is one of the current
problems in Spain?
Answer: It would help a bit for everything, but it is not a universal solution. It would
also help people to pay their taxes because there is the general impression that the
wealthy defraud the state more than the poor, which is true. What moral authority
do you have to tell a sole trader who struggles to make ends meet that they have to
pay their taxes, when medium and small companies usually pay punctually whilst
large company executives, owners and CEOs steal big money and get away with it?
Under what authority can you tell that sole trader that they are defrauding 50 Euros
when others are waltzing off with millions? I think a law to prevent this would make
society more morally right.
Question: The Central European Bank, Germany, the International Monetary Fund,... they
tell us that the salaries in Spain are too high for a country with such low productivity. How
could productivity be increased without having to lower salaries? Surely there must be
other ways...
Answer: Well, the productivity argument is a lie. Even if we worked 17-hour days,
we would not be productive. I think they just made it up, as I only see hard-working
people. What is 'being productive' anyway? It is a word to fill their mouths, but what
does it mean? Why should we work more hours, if there are six million unemployed
people? Why should not we work fewer hours and split the jobs? This way people
would have more time, consume more, be less tired... when people work too many
hours they get tired, are more prone to having accidents and making mistakes or
falling ill. The solution would involve having decent salaries and shorter working
times.
Question: Is it viable to raise the Minimum Wage and the pensions in the current economic
climate of instability, as your programme claims?
Answer: Yes, of course it is. For example take France: our situation is not as bad
so far as to reach a point of no return. If salaries rise, consumption increases. If
92
only everybody got paid 1000 per month... The MW in Spain is much lower than in
the Scandinavian countries. The MW should be increased to provide people with
more acquisitive power, meaning they would be able to spend more and thus be
more likely to spend. That would work out better according to capitalist precepts.
Question. Adam Smith stated that human capital is essential to create richness for a
nation. In Spain there is a school drop-out rate of 28% during the ESO (12 to 16 years old),
almost the highest in Europe. How do you think we could improve this situation? Will the
new law proposed by the PP be able to improve it or will it have no effect on the negative
figures we have?
Answer: This is a more complex matter. We come from a poorer country with
limited access to culture. Schools teach the culture of the middle and wealthy social
classes, with which children cannot relate. What I mean is that it is clear that
teaching methods in our schools must change. A different public school needs to be
designed; public funding for education is poor, whereas grandiose projects have
received loads of money from public investment. If more money had been invested
in funding public schools and there was more teaching training, school failure would
be reduced.
First of all, universities should not teach how the private sector works, they should
teach people to think and be able to decide for themselves what they will do in the
future. Teachers need professional updates; they do not need to teach you how a
Samsung machine works. They should teach you the strategies to learn for yourself
how to use it: a general mind frame, a background.
Universities do not need to be training grounds for companies; in fact companies do
not invest anything in education. In fact they should be the first ones to enable
people to teach. With the grants given, students should not have such a hard time
when they enter full time employment, because in theory they should have a tutor.
Even if school failure is one of the highest in Europe, scientific studies in Spanish
universities are amongst the most prestigious. Huge advances have been made,
which have never been experienced before; yet funding’s have been cut. For a
more social and democratic university, forms must change, no more lifelong tenures
for professors.
Question: What are your qualifications?
Answer: Superior technician in IT administration, BA (hons) in English Philology,
Masters in Education and I am currently preparing a PhD.
93
Question: Should Spain invest more in investigation and innovation?
Answer: An article is being put together about the fallacy of profitability in R&D.
Anything researched will sooner or later end up producing results, especially in
science but in more humanistic pursuits as well. R&D funding’s should not be cut.
However, there must be some control. What is worth the most nowadays is Viagra
and the largest investigative journals are funded by pharmaceutical companies. In
the same way that the economy has always been funded by the largest
corporations, if they do not agree with what you do, your work does not get
published. These companies are cramping freedom to investigate because they
want scientists to participate in as many investigations as possible. This should not
be the parameter to evaluate investigations; an external institution, which allows
more participation and is more democratic, is required.
Question: Let's discuss the questionable efficiency of the employment reform imposed by
the current government. Spain had 5 million unemployed people before its implementation;
at the moment, the figure is over 6 million. Is the reform failing? How should the reform be
improved to generate employment?
Answer: The big question! Innovation has to be real; innovation in renewable
technologies. Spain is the sunniest country in Europe, so investing in renewable
energies is something we lack. We are living in this post-industrialised world where
production means have been taken to third-world countries where there are no
rights for workers. We should focus on research. Science is fundamental, as well as
better delegation of work. In the current situation we need a minimum rent so that
people do not starve. People paying minimum rent are not going to accept bad jobs
if their basic needs are covered, as badly paid job can make them ill and unhappy.
The government should be reducing working times and raising salaries - the
opposite of what is being done - as well as providing more protection for workers,
measures that facilitate the creation of employment for companies, more job
security... if there is no security, there is no confidence when it comes to
consuming. There should be an advance and not a regression in social rights.
Question: In theory, private companies are more efficient and effective than public
companies, due to the competitive environment where their activities occur. What would be
the sense of nationalising strategic sectors?
Answer: Well, they are everybody's. Water, sun and earth belong to everyone -
they should not belong to anyone specific. These sectors benefit all of us and those
we all use should be declared common goods. There should also be a public bank
94
to fund people's initiatives to make everything cheaper, as now we pay for the most
expensive electricity in Europe. This is due to the neoliberal policy imposed by our
government. Strategic sectors, including those large companies that look profitable
but are failing, should be nationalised. These could become cooperatives. There
are other ways towards nationalisation, as the Cooperative of Mondragón shows,
and there are companies like Eroski, controlled by its workers.
Question: 99% of Spanish companies are SMEs, and are the engines to keep and
generate employment. Private banks use the assets given by the ECB for their own
regeneration, leaving companies deprived from the necessary credit for their development.
Should banks be more thoughtful towards the needs of the SMEs or should a public bank
be created specifically for this purpose?
Answer: I used to work for an SME and it had no means to fund itself. It was run by
a family who ended up selling to a large company; that is why it is not interesting for
the banks. It is clear that it is necessary to help people keep control over their own
jobs. SMEs are the ones that offer better quality of life for their workers, although
perhaps not in terms of salary. It is crucial to help SMEs, maybe even by law or by
creating governmental organisations to help them. Banks can do whatever they
want with their money.
Question: What are the effects of the exodus of talent that the country is experiencing?
Answer: We are the most educated generation and we are starving. I am 27 years
old and I am living with my parents. The salaries are not high enough to develop as
people. If you have to go abroad, maybe you will not live substantially better, but it
will certainly be an improvement, at the cost of living far from your family, your
neighbourhood, your people. There are already family dramas beyond the personal
and economic repercussions for individuals. I do not know what model of country
they want, but this one will become the geriatric of Europe. They want us to leave
them alone, but I will stay to fight. I want to stay because those in power are
screwing our future and our parents' future up. I do not blame anyone who prefers
to leave, though – it is understandable. I am not an economist; I am just someone
who cares.
95
Interview: Jorge A. Calvo Pazos – Participant 4
(Ex-general secretary of Socialist Youths of Galicia – Spain)
Question: What do you think were the triggers of the economic crisis in Spain and what
are the differences and similarities compared with other European countries?
Answer: Let's see! The economic crisis in Spain and the differences and similarities
compared with other European countries. What I believe is that people have a
misleading idea of what constitutes a crisis in a capitalist system. People think there
are periods of growth and that these periods are interrupted by occasional crises,
which are caused by the market's way of working or various singular situations.
However, the aim of capitalism is to concentrate the capital in fewer hands every
time, hence the rich become richer and the poor become poorer. The gap between
them expands.
Question: Why has the impact of the crisis not been as noticeable in the UK, compared to
Spain?
Answer: In Spain there are some particular features not found in many other
countries. Following the arrival of Aznar to power and the re-regulation of soil law,
Spain based its economic model on the construction industry. Banks would lend
money to construction companies. According to the theory of diminishing returns, if
you have a large amount of a product and put it in the market at once, its price will
decrease. If potatoes are very common, their price will drop. Likewise with
tomatoes. So it was unnatural that the same thing was not happening with the
housing market. It was said prices would not go down and indeed they did not go
down, although they should have - and there you go... for a while, the housing
market bubble got bigger because of the rumour that prices would not go down. At
the same time, construction companies were building prolifically. In summary, the
Spanish economy depended heavily on the construction business. When the credit
crunch occurred in the United Estates, what corporations were passing to one
another in 2009 was a hot potato. A bundle of bonds that really were lent debt, and
that belonged to people who could not afford to pay, were being passed along.
Spain only produced one thing, whereas in the UK there was the oil in Scotland, the
City (in London) and many other worldwide competitive sectors. Hence the crisis
became more noticeable in Spain when the construction industry receded.
96
Question. What is the correlation between the political crisis and the economic crisis?
Answer: I think that the political and institutional crisis in Spain has its origins in
the Spanish Transition. In fact, there was no transition as there was no rupture, only
a capitulation of the political forces at that time. It was not believed that democracy
could emerge from such a rupture; instead they just adapted the institutions
inherited from Franco's dictatorship to a new political situation, in which the King
became Franco's successor and the Spanish Courts an evolution of Franco's
Courts. Fair enough, they were already created, although the way of choosing the
MPs was different. Democratic quality in Spain is low, which is not directly related to
the economic crisis but rather linked to the very origin of the political structures and
institutions that come from Franco's time in Spain. There is an original sin in their
constitution and the economic crisis is letting people realise this.
Question: Do you think that the Spanish debt is not sustainable and should not be paid?
Answer: Well, what do I know? I was discussing this precise subject with a very
famous lawyer, José Antonio Pérez, and he said that the Spanish debt is very
clearly partially illegitimate. International law says that illegitimate debt is against the
interests of citizenship and that when this occurs the debt should not be repaid. If
this part of the debt is the bit that Rajoy has dedicated to rescuing the banks, which
up to now will have to be repaid by the Spanish public, at the end of the day it is
transforming private debt into public debt.
Question: Would exiting the Euro be viable?
Answer: Some economists are arguing that maybe it would be viable to have two
differentiated Euro currency zones: the North Euro and the South Euro. This way
the southern countries, which are most affected by the economic crisis, could
devaluate their currency. When the Maastricht treaty was signed, it was already
pointed out that there could be difficulties in having one single currency with so
many different economic situations amongst the various countries. In Spain there
are people who are really having a hard time in this crisis and the only ace that
Spain has is to bang the table and threaten it will leave the EU, so that a
conversation is started about finding a solution, as the EU is not interested in Spain
leaving.
Question: About the austerity measures imposed by Europe: are they adequate or do they
threaten the welfare state in Spain?
Answer: These measures are unfair. Say that a teacher gets their salary cut today;
tomorrow, they will not have their salary reduced, they will be made redundant. In
97
time, this will destroy the Spanish welfare system. In addition more companies will
close down, which will result in people having less money and less power of
acquisition, company owners earning less and therefore making more people
redundant, thus multiplying the negative effect. These austerity measures work in
Germany, to ensure that their financial companies get paid.
Question: What would the most effective steps be to achieve an electoral reform, as there
is also a political crisis?
Answer: A consensus should be reached at the Congress of Deputies to issue a
new law, but I do not think that is going to happen because it has not happened
yet... I do not think there is a perfect law, but for instance in Scotland if you achieve
51% of the votes you get 51% of the seats; however in Spain you can rule with an
absolute majority despite amassing only 28% of the votes, which is completely
unfair for the citizenship.
Question: Would a transparency law be the solution to fight political and economic
corruption?
Answer: Corruption has been rife throughout the history of Spain, not only during
the history of democracy but also before. Spain has been characterised by corrupt
politics. A transparency law should allow the citizens know to what is done with
every cent they pay in taxes, which I do not think will happen in Spain. There will
still be corruption and everything else because politicians are not interested in
preventing it.
Question: What would the ideal tax system be for fiscal reform in Spain?
Answer: When I studied Business Administration in Santiago de Compostela, I
was taught that a tax system needs to be progressive, so that people who have
more must pay more. Instead, the system in Spain is regressive - those who have
more, pay less. Companies in the IBEX35 are paying between 1% and 8% in tax
and the rest goes abroad. In the 1929 credit crunch, one strategy that helped the
U.S. out of the crisis was that the richest and largest companies paid more than
60% of their earnings in taxes.
Question: What about raising the Minimum Wage? Spain has one of the lowest MW in
Europe (Eur718). The same applies to the pensions. Would it be viable to raise them in the
current period of instability?
Answer: If the rich paid more taxes there would be more money in Spain to
support the Spanish pensions scheme. At the same time, if the rich paid all they
98
owe and fiscal fraud ended, then there would be enough money to raise salaries.
Question: The Central European Bank, Germany, the International Monetary Fund... they
tell us that salaries in Spain are too high for a country with such low productivity. How could
productivity be increased without having to lower salaries? Surely there must be other
ways...
Answer: They say in Spain we are not productive... nonsense! We will have to
start working like in Bangladesh. What they mean is that in a cheap working market
competitiveness is achieved not only by lowering salaries but also improving
products. If your product is better you can compete with more expensive prices. In
Spain products need to be cheaper, which means lowering salaries. Well, in Spain
shops open at 10 or 11 until 13.30 and close for lunch, then reopen at 16.30 or 17
until 20:00. In other countries, shops are open from 9 to 17 or 19: this makes them
more productive. Foreign companies also invest more time and resources training
their employees, which increases their productivity.
Question: How can we become more competitive if we receive complaints about our
competitiveness? What should we improve? What are the basics needed to improve our
competitiveness?
Answer: In Spain, competitiveness is understood as being cheaper than your
competitor next door by cutting salaries. It is not understood that a product can be
more competitive thanks to its quality. To improve quality you need to invest in
R&D, which is not something that is invested in Spain, where salaries are
automatically lowered instead. Take Finland for instance. What is it about Finland?
Why is Finland a relatively internationally successful country in terms of its
economy, unlike Spain? What have they got? They dedicate a lot of money to the
education of their citizens and their government invests more in R&D than Spain
does.
Question: Adam Smith stated that human capital is essential to create richness for a
nation. In Spain there is a school drop-out rate of 28% during the ESO (12 to 16 years old),
almost the highest in Europe. How do you think we could improve this situation? Will the
new law imposed by the PP be able to improve it or will it not affect the negative figures we
have?
Answer: I can talk about the Spanish universities of the 1990s, when I attended. At
University in the 1990s you attended the lectures if you wanted to. There were
amphitheatres’ where 200 or 300 people were cramped in a room, groups should
be minimised, as in England, with seminars of 12 people in order to obtain
99
personalised treatment. In Spain there is no personal attention from the teacher so
there is no interest in helping people to come out with critical thinking and a good
education. With the increase in university fees and the reduction of grants, only the
privileged will study.
Question: Let's discuss the questionable efficiency of the reform on employment imposed
by the current government. Spain had 5 million unemployed people before its
implementation; at the moment it is over 6 million. Is the reform failing? How should the
reform be improved to generate employment?
Answer: The reform on employment is something that the Spanish right wing
parties have always wanted to do, but they have never had the opportunity to do it
until now, when the crisis has provided them with the chance. What they want is to
change the structure; they want people to work for less money with less right. That
is what they have always wanted to do, but this was not something commonly
believed to create employment. If redundancy has been made easier for companies
to enforce and employment has been made cheaper, you do not need to be
Einstein to realise that making people redundant will be cheaper and therefore more
popular. It is 2 + 2 equals 4: everybody knows it. The theory is that companies do
not hire because employee dismissal is very expensive, so they do not want to
hand permanent contracts to their employees. On one hand this theory is good, but
this theory does not apply in Spain because Spanish entrepreneurs are not looking
after their employees.
Question: In theory, private companies are more efficient and effective than public
companies, due to the competitive environment where their activities occur. What would be
the sense of nationalising strategic sectors?
Answer: As an ideological principle, I think that the natural resources of a country
belong to its people; rivers, for example, belong to all Spanish people. Private
companies make their business from these resources and they charge citizens
more expensive prices for them. The government of a nation should handle the
natural resources of a country. The resources of all citizens, a public good, cannot
be used for the financial gain of a few.
Question: Should the same apply to banks? Should a public bank be created?
Answer: There should be a public bank as well as private banks. A public bank is
necessary to fund companies and create the conditions so that Spain can invest in
industry and R&D. SMEs should have access to loans with a bank that is not
motivated purely by economic profit; a public bank moved by the goal of building a
100
country, as the economic development from entrepreneurial growth helps economic
recovery.
- Thank you very much for your help!
I hope it is been useful for you.
101
Interview: Stuart Barrett – Participant 5
(Senior Lecture at Manchester Metropolitan University.
Teaching specialisms: ‘International Business, Business Economics and Asia-Pacific
Economics and Business’)
Question: What do you think are the causes of the economic crisis in Spain?
Answer: Complex, two main ones I think one Spain is part of the Eurozone, which
means it has had for a long time interest rates that are far too low, then it should
have. Those low interest rates have caused a boom in credit - both private and
public borrowing - so when the global economy slowed down, Spain was in trouble.
Fundamentally it is because they are part of the Eurozone. All the southern
European nations have had interest rates that are far too low for them. England’s
interest rates were not as low ten years ago as they were in Spain. Spain’s got
inflation (not clear)
Question: What is the correlation between political crisis and economic crisis?
Answer: I do not know much about the political crisis I would say that the
problems in all of the southern European countries are caused by an economic
problem and the politicians have nowhere to go they have no answer to the
economic crisis because it is a problem of the Euro. They cannot do anything, as
they have no monetary policy tools available to them. So they have nothing to do.
That causes political problems clearly.
Question: Is the Spanish debt legitimate and sustainable according to its creditors, or
should it be re-negotiated or the payments be suspended for a certain period of time?
Answer: That depends on Germany I think if Germany is happy to stand behind
the Spanish debt then it is ok if Germany decides they do not want to. It is down to
Germany. Well to some degree Spanish debt has already been renegotiated as has
Portugal and has Greece it may well need to be done again it all depends on
whether the German parliament wants to do that or not they can extend Spanish
debt way out to the future if the European central bank wants to buy Spanish debt
they can, but that is for German to decide. So it may well be sustainable, it may not.
102
It depends. Germany has an election next month so it will be clearer after that
where they stand.
Question: What would the negative consequences imposed by Europe be, in case the
debt remained unpaid? Would this be a lesser damage for the recovery of the economy of
the country?
Answer: Spain does not have any decision in this. It is the Markets and it is
Germany. Through the European Central Bank, but the central bank will do what
Germany tells them to do. So it would not surprise me if Spanish debt will be not so
much renegotiated but perhaps the European Central Bank will buy Spanish debt
which will keep interest rates down. At the moment Germany will not allow that to
happen. But it would not surprise me if they did.
Question: Would exiting the Euro be viable?
Answer: I do not think so. I think politicians will do whatever it takes to keep the
Euro. I think Greece should have left a long time ago and they did not which
suggests to me that the Germans and the French are determined to keep the Euro
zone together so I think Spain will stay in it. It will be a disaster for them but I think
they will stay in and it will get worse.
Question: Regarding the austerity measures, are they a good choice or do they threaten
the Spanish welfare state?
Answer: Well, austerity for Spain does not work it is not possible to have enough
austerity to make any difference to the size of the debt. What Spain needs is growth
and it cannot have growth with the level of debt hanging over it with austerity, and
not being able to print its own money. Britain is seeing growth because it has its
own currency and can print and create money. Spain cannot do this, so austerity is
a nonsense policy which makes things worse. Spain has no choice; it does not have
its own currency. By far history tell us that the easiest way to get out of a debt
problem is through inflation you create rise in prices and the easiest way to do that
is to print more money which is what American is doing, the Japanese are doing,
the Chinese are doing, what the British are doing and what the Europeans are not
doing. Because the Germans who basically control the European Central Bank
have never believed in that policy they do not believe in printing money and inflating
103
away debt because of what happened historically in Germany in the 1920’s and
1930’s. So they demand on Spain, Portugal and Greece austerity and it makes
things worse.
Question: Would a transparency law be the solution to fight political and economic
corruption?
Answer: I do not know anything about that I do not know what a transparency law
is. Well in politics we have a tradition of open government and honesty we have
quite a large free press and it is the media really that hold politicians to account so
through that we do ok I suppose but we have had these institutions for 300 or 400
years. In other parts of Europe they are basically young democracies they have not
built those institutions. I think there are historical reasons for that.
Question: What about raising the minimum wage? Spain has one of the lowest minimum
wages in Europe (Eur728); the same applies to the pensions. Would it be viable to raise
them in the current instability period?
Answer: The problem is in a Eurozone Spain has to compete with all the other
countries in the Eurozone, you can compete on costs, which are wages, or you can
compete on productivity. Spain, France and everybody else are not as productive
as Germany and so to compete on costs in some ways you can only go so far with
it. It is not the answer.
Question: The Central European Bank, Germany, the International Monetary Fund, they
tell us that the salaries in Spain are too high for a low productivity country. How could
productivity be increased without having to lower salaries? Surely there must be other
ways...
Answer: Everybody has the same problem. Britain has a productivity problem we
have to train people we have to invest in technology and new equipment. And we
have to have management systems that incentivise work and encourage greater
harder work if you like. It is all of those things it is a difficult one productivity but
Spain’s is not particularly good. Too much sleep in the afternoon. It depends on the
industry. It does take a long time for it to come through. I think raising the minimum
wage now would just add to cost and Spain may make in the short-term
104
unemployment worse. And even if people get paid more money the chances are
they would use the extra money to pay for debt rather than spending it.
Question: How can we become more competitive if we receive complaints about our
competitiveness? What should we improve? What are the main pillars to improve our
competitiveness?
Answer: Spain is not competitive against Germany, which is who you have to be
competitive against. Again, a big problem with that is that you have the same
currency. If Spain had its own currency, it could let the peseta fall in value so your
exports would be competitive - but you cannot do that. I do not know why they
entered the Euro.
Question: Adam Smith stated that human capital is essential to create richness for a
nation. In Spain, there is a high drop-out rate (28%) during the compulsory secondary
education, almost the highest in Europe. How do you think we could improve the education
system?
Answer: What would an economist say if you want something to happen? You
incentivise it you create incentives to change behaviour. I do not know much about
the Spanish education system so I do not know why people drop out but it seems to
me it should not be that difficult to incentivise young people to have an education. I
do not know how the system in Spain is. In England is compulsory education till 16
then you can stay on for 2 years and do A Levels and then go to University
afterwards. And we have about 45% go to higher education to Sunday group which
is probably too high. It is not so much about the quantity of people doing it is the
quality of it and maybe some of those students in higher education would benefit
more from doing an apprenticeship. So I do not know all countries face the same
problem. We have not enough students doing science and engineering so we are
trying to incentivise more science and engineering which is working when they get
subsidise.
Question: The questionable efficiency of the new reform on labour market imposed by the
current government – Spain had 5 million unemployed people before its implementation, at
the moment it is over 6 million. Is the reform being a failure? How should the reform be
improved to generate employment?
105
Answer: I do not know what the labour market is in Spain what I would say in
Britain we have had over the last 20 or 30 years continual labour market reform so
we have a very flexible labour market and during the current crisis we have not had
a very bad unemployment problem cause many people like myself have taking
away treats or work four or three days a week. Many employers have offered their
works to cut wages rather them making them redundant. I think that is has made a
big difference to our unemployment. Where in Spain, France and Greece unions
are stronger and there is a lot more resistance to cutting wages. If it is expensive to
make people redundant then you do not hire them in the first place. You need to be
more flexible. Businesses are more likely to employ someone if they know should
the market change they can get rid of people. The fact the unemployment is high is
not so much to do with the labour market reform is to do with the general economic
situation. It does not matter what reforms you do with the labour market in Spain
now it will not make much difference to the overall thing it is the general economic
situation that it the problem the labour market reform it is for the future it is for the
next crisis. Spain needs growth then they can worry about the labour market reform
later. They need to grow. It is from 10 years ago or 20 years ago.
Question: Should Spain invest more in R&D and innovation?
Answer: Yes. Well again it comes to incentives I do not know what the tax
situation is in Spain but most countries in the world offer businesses tax breaks if
they invest in R&D. You also need of course engineers and scientist. You need a
bigger pool of human capital. Another important thing is of course are businesses
only tend to invest on those things (R&D) if the economy is growing, or if they
perceive the future economy to be expanding. It would be madness for any
business in Spain at the moment to invest in R&D they have no idea what the future
is. So if you have money you hold on to your money until things improve. Maybe
few years ago the incentives were not enough for firms to invest.
Question: 99% of Spanish firms are medium and small enterprises, which is the engine to
keep and create employment. Private banks use the assets given by the European Central
Bank for their own regeneration, leaving firms deprived from the necessary credit for their
development. Should banks be more thoughtful towards the needs for the SMEs or should
a public bank be created for the purpose?
106
Answer: Well that is about reform there is no reason why Spain should be 44 why
not 20? Those reforms are very easy to do to make easier for businesses to open
and operate. You just change the rules. For example if you want to register your
business it cost some money. It could make it free. To buy and sell businesses, to
import and export to do various things you can make it easier to do and maybe
Spain has a traditional of bureaucracy it has a large civil service and people do not
do very much but they are very protective of their jobs and institutions. That will take
from politicians some will they have to have the will to make the change and I guess
that in Spain they are too many people that do not want the change like unions.
There are people that do not want that change to happen. You better sort it with
reform. There is no reason why Spain cannot do it I can only assume that there is
resistance to it like trade unions. I can only assume that some people that do not
want that reform to happen. Often are the trade unions that represent work and the
civil service and government departments. In the UK private banks provide credits
to businesses, which are hard to get at the moment banks, are reluctant to lend but
that will change. Moving credit from banks to businesses is a problem all countries
have faced in the last few years, as banks do not have enough money to lend: that
is why it is called a credit crunch. But as I said, that will change as banks improve
their balance sheets. It is a problem that all countries face. Spain is going to
continue to have problems without their own economy. What we found here is all
these problems of labour market and barriers to business all of those things they do
not matter to much when the economy is doing well but when the economy is
struggling those things suddenly are a big problem the time to address them is
when things are going well not now this should have been done ten years ago so
things would not be so bad now. So to do those things now in politically difficult I
think. I do not know where the whole Euro thing will go I think it will just stumble on
and on. Maybe one day the Spanish people will say we have had enough and
demand to leave the Euro. I do not know what people in Spain think. The sooner
the better but I do not think it will happen soon because too many politicians have
made too many commitments to it. Is there any party in Spain that wants to leave
the Euro? The communists? Well maybe that is the problem that there are no
political parties that represent this certain view. We have in Britain political parties
that do not want to join the Euro so we can vote for them. In Spain both parties do
not want to leave the Euro. It is not democratic. I suppose the good news is that
being in the Eurozone is that you can all leave Spain and go somewhere else and
come to work in Britain or Germany. It is very sad. It is very difficult. It is the Euro.
107
Focus Group – Participant 6
(Debate group of Spanish people who have studied at Spanish universities and are
currently living in England, due to a lack of job opportunities in Spain – i.e. Graduates in
Business Management, Economics, Education, Tourism and IT Engineers)
Question: What are the triggers of the Spanish economic crisis and its resemblances and
differences compared with the crisis in other European countries?
Answers:
- Construction and tourism have always been key sectors for growth in Spain. In
construction there was an unsustainable bubble that logically had to explode.
Tourism is very influenced by other sectors and, in addition, it is seasonal. Thus as
soon as the international crisis started, it was only logical that, in a country like
Spain with these two sectors being vital for the economic growth, the other sectors
would be dragged along.
- Everything started with something that happened in the US, with the so-called
'NINJA mortgages'. In a globalised world like ours, where everybody buys debt from
other countries, these circumstances have inevitably affected all of us.
- If, in addition to this, a country like the US, which is currently one of the biggest
players in the world's economy, is experiencing an important economic crisis,
inevitably in Spain the consequences were to have a bigger impact, hence the
situation we are currently in.
- The existing corruption in our country also has to be taken into account. A large
proportion of leaders pursue their personal interests instead of social well-being;
this results in a diminished sense of responsibility. The same happens at the banks
Question: What is the correlation between the economic crisis and the political and
institutional crisis in Spain?
Answers:
- I think now we place more attention on the political crisis due to the extremely weak
economic situation in the country. That is, before this we had the same amount of
thieves (or even more) but as things were going well, and the population
overwhelmingly lived in economic good times, we did not care about these
robberies and corruption scandals
- Banks agreed with those unjustifiable loans and the expenditure of non-existent
108
money, speculating on what earnings there would be in 40 years' time. As a result,
nowadays there is no money and those who still have some keep it due to the
situation of generalised concern in our society.
Question: Is the Spanish debt legitimate and sustainable in relation to its lenders, or
should it be re-negotiated? Should repayments be temporarily stopped?
Answers:
- The debt should be re-negotiated, at least the interest rate we are paying. This is
somehow inherent to capitalism; if certain northern European countries are to work
well, some other countries must be made to fall. This is the role we have been given
in this partnership. Germany is very interested in charging that debt, because they
are the major creditors. It is the loans they have offered and the interests that those
generate where Germany can maximise its profit.
- Another cause of the crisis is that we operate with the same currency, but with very
different policies.
Question: Would it be viable for Spain to exit the Euro?
Answer:
- It would be yet another shock and disruption for the population. I believe that the
main reason for this is that our country does not produce any goods; the majority of
them are imported. In fact, manufacturing is one of the main sources of wealth for
any country. In addition to this, the strongest sectors we currently have, such as
tourism, are not being taken advantage of as responsibly and efficiently as they
should be exploited. The overall Spanish mentality is messy and involves investing
abroad instead of in ourselves to promote our own sectors.
Question: What about a bifurcated Euro?
Answers:
- There could be a Euro with a different rate, or at least a currency that could be
devalued if necessary. However, this would establish a social difference between
the rich and the poor in Europe, which is currently only an underlying idea. It is true
that having pesetas made the country more appealing as a tourist destination for
the neighbouring countries; now all those visitors may end up going to other
countries which offer a cheaper currency exchange rate, such as Turkey. We have
a rich currency in a poor country. All this despite having undergone a tougher
109
selection process (inflation, external debt, gearing, etc.) than there is today.
However, when we did it, the situation was favourable and we could join the EU.
Right now we have none of that.
Question: Regarding the austerity measures imposed by Europe – are these measures
appropriate or do they act against the Spanish welfare system?
Answers:
- We aim to follow the example led by the US, based on high consumption. Instead,
Spain cuts back salaries and pensions more and more, an austerity policy. What
this austerity causes is the closing down of SMEs, which are the main engine of the
country. At the end of the day, these SMEs are what generate dynamism, profits
and jobs, and they are closing down.
- These policies have been adopted to please European creditors such as Germany.
They have large companies and the cutbacks do not affect them to the same extent
as they affect our country. Fiscal policies should be amended; as SMEs and sole
traders are being affected the most by the current measures taken.
Question: What would the most effective steps be to achieve electoral reform? What
would the perfect electoral system be, as opposed to the current bipartisanism?
Answers:
- In our country there is bipartisanism and some lose out in favour of others. In Spain,
22% of votes achieve a majority government. The problem is that the two largest
parties are not interested in changing these laws because they have been
alternating government periods, so both of them would lose if these laws changed.
- It is also true that nothing will happen if the population does not fight and
demonstrate for things to change. We must fight for the acknowledgement of our
rights as citizens.
Question: What measures should a proposed transparency law include to fight political
and economic corruption?
Answers:
- It is a smokescreen, as politicians determine what becomes published, what is
transparent and what is not. For a law to be correct, parties should logically be
externally audited, as opposed to internally audited as they are now; parties are
able to hide what they want.
110
- Another problem consists of the fact that, in practice, judicial power is not separated
from legislative power. As a result, politicians who are not fulfilling their roles
properly and simply using their mandates trying to become rich do not go through a
regular court process like any other citizen would. There are many hidden interests
and forces that combine to keep those politicians from indictment and cover up any
irregularities happening with public funds.
Question: What would the ideal tax system be for future fiscal reform in Spain?
Answers:
- The problem is that in Spain the tax system is not followed in reality. It is supposed
to be a progressive tax system; large companies have more access to tools to
elude those tax charges, such as fiscal paradises held by some of the companies in
the IBEX35. Instead, small companies have no real power... should they hide the
money under their mattresses?
- The people who have power to change this system are the same ones with
personal agendas; hence they are not interested in controlling tax evasion. The
population and the SMEs are the ones losing out, as they cannot evade taxes or
afford to pay for them.
Question: Would it be viable to increase the Minimum Wage and the pensions scheme in
the current economic climate?
Answers:
- We all already know that we will not receive a pension after we retire in this country
(Spain).
- Raising pensions would not be viable due to the high unemployment rate, which
makes income from this source insufficient to cover the cost of these pensions.
- It would also be interesting to raise salaries and reduce the number of MPs and
politicians per capita who are completely redundant. At the same time, more tax
inspectors would prevent tax evasion and generate a feeling of responsibility to
prevent the current situation of generalised fraud.
Question: The Minimum Wage in Spain has decreased over the past few years with the
excuse being that Spain is not being competitive enough compared with Europe. How
could Spain become more competitive without having to reduce Spanish workers' salaries?
111
Answers:
- I do not know why they think we are unproductive citizens. I have not seen any
English people work with the same efficiency as a Spanish person. It is an excuse
to justify the reduction of wages. They could have come up with anything else as an
excuse.
- In economy, productivity is the product made per unit of time. The only way to
improve productivity is through motivating employees, investing in R&D and
improvement of means of production. Training, as given to employees’ abroad, is
key. Spanish companies do not prioritise staff or investment in improving their
productivity and therefore their final profit.
Question: Human capital is essential to generate wealth in a nation. For this reason, it is
key to develop and maintain a public education system. What would the ideal framework
for a reform of the education system be - a system that is currently not profitable due to the
high drop-out rates in secondary education and the ineffectiveness of the Spanish
universities, which do not provide appropriate entry into the job market?
Answers:
- In Spain there is a lack of cultural sensitivity. Young people are not brought up to
study and have high academic profiles because our politicians and the system do
not promote that.
- Children are stuck in school all day long for the convenience of their parents'
working times. They are 'parked' during the day and when they arrive home they
are apathetic and do not fancy doing anything. They crave spending time with their
families and seek their parents' attention.
- The average grade necessary to be a teacher in our country is of the lowest in the
world (6.5) so the profession is not valued and not seeking the best professionals
for such an important element in a society such as teaching. In addition, the degree
is not orientated towards specialisation of professionals anymore; due to cutbacks,
any teacher is expected to take over any lesson of any subject if they are covering
for a sick leave of less than 20 days.
- Spanish university teaches basic principles to master a subject, but it neither
teaches to think critically nor to reason like a trained professional. Students finish
their grades with a huge amount of knowledge but little or no practice and they are
not proactive when it comes to tackling professional situations and the various
complications there may be.
112
Question: Considering the questionable efficiency of the current job reform, what other
viable, sustainable measures could effect a reduction in unemployment in the short and
medium terms?
Answers:
- Above all, helping sole traders, as we mentioned earlier. Entrepreneurship should
be encouraged.
- Policies should be consistent, at least. Redundancies may be unavoidable for many
companies, but of course a little support to those made redundant who set up small
companies, would make things easier for them.
- This reform has not solved anything: it has not improved the quality of employment,
or promoted it. It is actually gone worse, like a solution to improve and make up
balances and budgets to reduce the apparent debt. In the long term it will not take
us anywhere. It will just make the economic crisis worse and transform it into a
social crisis.
Question: Over 90% of Spanish companies are SMEs, which are the engine to create and
maintain employment. Private banks are using the majority of the assets given to them by
the EEC for their own clean-up, leaving companies unable to access the necessary funds
for their development. Should more solidarity be demanded from the banks or should a
public bank be created to watch over this aspect exclusively?
Answer:
- Yes, there should exist a bank exclusively to provide loans for SMEs, to help them
move forward and remain the engine of the Spanish economy by promoting
employment. Free redundancy is being implemented instead. However, small
businesses still encounter many difficulties. This encourages fraud instead of
employment. The accounts are getting cleared out but at the cost of diminishing
social capital.
113
Interviews – Spanish version Entrevista 1: Tania Sánchez Melero Pregunta - ¿Cuáles cree usted que son los detonantes de la crisis económica española?
Respuesta - Un modelo económico basado en la especulación urbanística y por
tanto en el sometimiento a crédito bancario tanto de las administraciones como de
las familias y obviamente cuando eso quiebra por el arrastre de la quiebra
estadounidense pues en España se produce con mayor dureza porque era el único
sector productivo que estaba sosteniendo los niveles de crecimiento que
manteníamos hasta el momento.
Pregunta - Entonces la idea de que hemos vivido por encima de nuestras posibilidades es
mentira ¿No?
Respuesta - No, yo lo que creo es que obviamente esta crisis es una excusa para
consolidar un modelo de sociedad, de productividad y de estado, bueno pues muy
capitaneado por él neoliberalismo, ¿no? yo creo que en este país la deuda pública
no era una exageración en ningún caso ni siquiera en la de las comunidades que
eran las que tenían la mayor deuda pública y una deuda insostenible y es cuando
se decide asumir la deuda de la banca para seguir garantizando los beneficios de
esta, una vez que tienen hipotecados todos sus bienes en proyectos especulativos
cuando se produce una situación de una verdadera deuda pública y el
sometimiento de la prioridad del pago de esa deuda bancaria que ha sido
absorbido por lo público es lo que no lleva a la situación de falta digamos de
liquidez del sistema público en todos sus niveles y bueno se ve en los telediarios
cotidianamente en el estado pero hay situaciones muy graves en los ayuntamientos
donde tienen que decidir si hacen una rebeldía y no pagan la deuda que les ha
impuesto el gobierno que debe pagarla para garantizar el pago de las nóminas de
los funcionarios que en última instancia prestan los servicios que garantizan
derechos fundamentales, ¿No? . En definitiva, es una crisis del capitalismo que
como todas las crisis en lugar de ser resuelta lo que hacen es desplazarse,
entonces se ha desplazado de la crisis financiera en la banca privada a la crisis
pública asumiendo la deuda por parte de las entidades públicas.
Pregunta – O sea ¿que usted ve que la deuda que tiene España no es sostenible y que
no se debería pagar?
Respuesta - Yo lo que pienso es que obviamente la deuda tiene que hacerse una
auditoria seria ya que estamos hablando del dinero de toda al ciudadanía que en
114
ultima instancia es el que sostiene al estado, por tanto la deuda debería auditarse,
debería conocerse a que responde tanto a la parte que ha sido absorbido de la
deuda bancaria como las deudas contraídas con administraciones de manera
digamos irresponsable en lugar de a intereses públicos y que todos esos
elementos no deberían ser pagados.
Pregunta - ¿Y tendría España algunas consecuencias negativas impuestas por Europa,
en el caso de impago de la deuda?
Respuesta - Pues seguramente el problema de esta situación, es que asumir una
quiebra de la disciplina de la TROIKA igual que planear una reflexión sobre la
posibilidad de salida del euro provoca una situación de incertidumbre sobre
cualquier estado que lo genere pero lo que genera menos incertidumbre, lo que
genera es una garantía de pobreza, de la mayoría social no, y esto es lo que hay
que empezar a plantear, que bueno pues que no se puede sostener las
imposiciones de la TROIKA cuando eso supone el empobrecimiento general de la
población que vamos que es una cosa que hay que decir basta en algún momento
y bueno hay casos en todo en todo el mundo a lo largo de la historia, en los que
se han hecho quita de deuda, en los que se ha dejado de pagar, en los que se ha
hecho moratoria, en las que se han tomado decisiones en contra de los intereses
en contra de los poderes financieros y a favor de la ciudadanía de cada uno de los
estados, y ningún estado se ha hundido eh? O sea ni Alemania cuando decide
dejar de pagar la deuda después de la guerra mundial, ni las naciones
latinoamericanas que han decidido dejar de someterse a los dictados del Fondo
Monetario Internacional, ni se han hundido, ni han desaparecido del planeta, ni han
tenido peores situaciones sobre sus poblaciones, más bien todo lo contrario, más
se han garantizado frenar el empobrecimiento de su población, y yo creo que ese
es el camino correcto porque no hay otro. Porque lo que está claro es que el
camino de la TROIKA es un empobrecimiento generalizado y no se puede seguir
permitiendo.
Pregunta - Si bueno lo de auditar la deuda lo hizo recientemente Ecuador y le ha salido
bastante bien, es un claro ejemplo, pero no pertenece a Europa ni a una comunidad,
¿debería España entonces salir de Europa para poder auditar la deuda y por lo tanto salir
también del euro?
Respuesta - Bueno, o buscar aislados en el sur de Europa que replanteen la salida
fácil de la política europea, que yo creo que es el camino que hay hacer y la
perspectiva que debería tener la izquierda de cara a esas elecciones europeas. Yo
115
creo que especialmente los países del sur deberían empezar a apostar por un
compromiso y una apuesta hacia los ciudadanos de quien apoya opciones de la
izquierda está apoyando una alianza de todas las naciones donde se tenga
mayoría para cambiar las reglas del juego también en Europa, porque bueno
también Europa no es inmutable y el hecho de que se haya construido sin ningún
instrumento democrático no nos debería perder la esperanza de reconvertir esa
realidad y empezar a exigir que las instituciones europeas no sean entes
administrativos no identificados y al margen de la democracia sino que sean
alianzas de naciones con criterios democráticos como son otras alianzas y
elementos de comunidad entre estados como son las latinoamericanas también
¿no? Pues bueno que hay intereses comunes que son compartidos y respetados
pero que luego no se pierde la soberanía y la capacidad de decisión económica
de cada uno de los países. Ese es el camino salvo que eso un país solo no lo va a
lograr, pero bueno hay que empezar a unificar discursos, igual que hay un discurso
hegemónico en Europa que lo capitanea Alemania, pues hay que hacer un
contrapoder a ese discurso.
Pregunta – O sea que los países latinos del sur de Europa se deberían unir ¿cree usted?
Respuesta- Al menos la periferia a quienes nos han reservado el papel de periferia
europea, y por lo tanto estamos condenados a que nuestra población no tenga más
esperanza que ser servidor de los ricos de Europa, y que tenemos que parar y
decir que nuestra ciudadanía tiene los mismos derechos, que es un conjunto de
Europa y los conjuntos del mundo debe dar unas condiciones dignas de vida y que
no vamos a permitir este modelo de desarrollo.
Pregunta - ¿Sobre las políticas de austeridad impuestas por Europa, son medidas
acertadas o por el contrario atentan contra el estado de bienestar español?
Respuesta - Pues son acertadas depende de cuál sea el objetivo, desde luego
para el objetivo de quienes han decidido que el único mercado posible para los
grandes capitales son los servicios fundamentales son acertadas las medidas de
austeridad lo que están determinando que cada vez más o al menos de una parte
de los derechos fundamentales que antes constituían el estado de bienestar y eso
es un negocio, un negocio para las aseguradoras, negocio para las empresas
sanitarias, para las empresas educativas y además una manera muy rápida de
cambiar el pensamiento, la hegemonía y la cultura ciudadana de un continente
¿no? Pero luego quienes pensamos que la política debe estar para garantizar el
bienestar colectivo y para distribuir el poder y decir que los más débiles deben ser
116
protegidos por los gobiernos, pues creemos que todas las medidas que se están
tomando son erróneas, lo primero porque no garantizan el crecimiento ni garantizan
condiciones que prevean una salida de la crisis en la que ese 20% de pobreza que
ahora mismo tiene España se reduzca y que se reduzca con perspectivas de
reducirse estructuralmente o sea de que no vuelva a haber un circulo donde se
vuelva a producir, vamos, medidas que se están tomando más bien malas y en el
camino contrario que haga aumentar esa bolsa personas que están fuera de los
derechos fundamentales porque no tienen acceso a un trabajo ¿no?, hay que
empezar a pensar que la riqueza esta mucho mas allá de la empresa y del trabajo,
y hay que empezar a distribuir la riqueza de un país para garantizar el bienestar
colectivo, todas las medidas que se están tomando desde el gobierno
económicamente no caminan hacia esa salida y socialmente está destruyendo el
estado de bienestar que se había desarrollado que desde luego en un país como
España que tiene una trayectoria digamos breve de democracia lo estaba
desarrollando en su máxima expresión.
Pregunta - De todas formas si mi memoria no falla creo que nunca ha salido un país de
una crisis con medidas de recorte.
Respuesta - No, claro.
Pregunta - ¿Cuáles serían los pasos efectivos a seguir para una reforma de ley electoral,
porque también tenemos una crisis política?
Respuesta - Sí, Pues yo creo que la ley electoral obviamente no representa la
voluntad popular, hay una distribución de las bolsas de voto, que hacen que no
todos los votos valgan los mismo y que hacen que los escaños de las
organizaciones políticas requieran de más respaldo democrático que otros,
nosotros hemos hecho a lo largo de la democracia muchas propuestas, ¿no? hay
salidas simples, que es aumentar el número de diputados y plantear una bolsa
digamos de restos de votantes, donde los votos de provincias con menos número
de diputados y por tanto con un sistema que tiende más al mayoritario y deja fuera
las minorías, pues esos votos sea una especie de bolsa de restos donde poder
asignar diputados para que esos votos no se pierdan y opción electoral de la
ciudadanía y no se pierdan. Otra alternativa es cambiarla la circunscripción del
modelo de provincia, que es una instancia que ha desaparecido de la cotidianidad
de la administración española y que responde a una época franquista y hace que
se cambie por que la circunscripción sea la comunidad autónoma que además
responde mucho más al modelo institucional actual ¿no? Pero en cualquier caso yo
117
creo que esto de las medidas validas para una reforma puntual que para ser un
modelo de democracia representativa y equipararse todos los ciudadanos ante ello,
pero yo creo que la circunstancias en las que estamos ahora de crisis política e
institucional como tu bien planteabas, creo que hay que ir más allá, creo que
España bueno vivió una transición democrática con una sociedad atenazada por el
miedo que fue pactada entre elites políticas aunque fueran unas elites plurales
donde participan todas las opciones salvo los nacionalistas que hay que recordar y
los republicanos, a pesar de que participaron todos no dejo de ser un acuerdo de
elites de una transición que si no eran esas condiciones pues tenía muchas
posibilidades de volver a ser un modelo de dictadura, eso suponía una situación de
atenaza en la población en la que se dijo si o no, a un modelo de transición donde
además no había otra alternativa y donde no había más que un amplio deseo de
salir de ese episodio negro que fue el franquismo. Yo creo que eso ha
evolucionado, hemos cambiado mucho, y somos una sociedad mucho más
madura democrática y políticamente y por tanto en Izquierda Unida estamos
planteando replantearse si es el momento de hacer un nuevo proceso constituyente
en el que sea la implicación de la ciudadanía la que vuelva a definir las reglas del
juego democrático y en ese marco pues las leyes electorales tendrán una
importancia de debate donde no solo hablaremos de cómo se distribuye la
representatividad sino que a lo mejor también hay que hablar de los niveles de
transparencia del compromiso de los electos de bueno, pues de la financiación de
los partidos, de todo un conjunto de medidas que ahora estamos viendo que
digamos están dinamitando por la vía de los hechos la democracia.
Pregunta - Pues con esto creo que me has contestado hasta la siguiente pregunta,
¿Crees que terminaría con el bipartidismo todas esas medidas?
Respuesta - Si yo creo que sería mucho más plural. De todas maneras el
bipartidismo en este país, en mi opinión, no es sólo es la mera alternancia de los
dos grandes partidos, y por tanto no solo hay que pensar como se reforma una ley
electoral para que tengan cabida otras opciones, sino que también es una forma de
perpetuar un modelo de desarrollo económico y social donde mandan los que no se
presentan a las elecciones, donde se mantiene el poder económico de las castas,
no y aquí hay que ponerles ojos a los mercados, los grandes empresarios de este
país, las empresas del IBEX 35, la banca de este país pues en esencia es la misma
que fue protagonista primero del expolio tras el golpe de estado y luego de la
transición se han quedado con ese poder económico, el poder económico no ha
sido democratizado y no ha sido transferido a la población y eso tiene que cambiar,
118
el bipartidismo es también una forma de perpetuar eso, y acabar con el
bipartidismo es una forma de acabar con muchos espacios de lo público en el
oscurantismo y alejado de la ciudadanía.
Pregunta - A mí siempre me habían vendido que el modelo de la transición española
como algo ejemplar, se ve que no fue así...
Respuesta - Yo creo que en este país ha habido una política de estado de
memoria como muchos de los países que han vivido dictaduras terroríficas que han
hecho una política de memoria de dignificación de los caídos por la democracia,
pues en este país ha habido una política de desmemoria y una política digamos de
exaltar hasta el ridículo ciertas figuras que ahora visto con perspectiva pues es
dudoso que jugasen un papel en el beneficio de todo el mundo y que no estuvieran
sirviendo a intereses particulares ¿no? Yo creo que la transición española fue un
proceso que probablemente no se podía haber hecho de ninguna otra manera y no
se trata ahora de pedirle cuentas a quienes lo capitanearon y fueron capaces de
construir ese espacio de democracia, pero si hay que decir que las circunstancias
han cambiado y que una cosa es reconocer que no había manera de hacer ese
proceso de transición y otra cosa es asumir el relato de que fue una transición
modélica y que sus protagonistas han sido héroes para la historia de este país, no,
los héroes fueron los que cayeron defendiendo la república y este país necesita
que su pueblo participe de un modelo democrático si queremos ser una democracia
avanzada donde ciertas cosas no pasan.
Pregunta - Bueno y con la corrupción, ¿Qué hacemos? ¿Una ley de transparencia sería
un solución para luchar contra la corrupción política y económica?
Respuesta - La corrupción no solo es un problema de moralidad individual, la
corrupción es un elemento sustancial de capitalismo forma parte de ese sistema, y
por tanto mientras no haya un proceso de democratización del control democrático
de la economía y de la banca, habrá corrupción porque habrá corruptores que son
mucho más importantes para que se dé la corrupción que los corrompidos,
mientras las empresas puedan donar y recibir contratos públicos sin que nadie les
pida cuentas, y sigamos hablando de un tesorero en lugar de hablar de todas las
empresas que se han beneficiado del dinero público y que no sabemos cuánto han
ganado a nuestra costa pues seguirá pasando. La ley de transparencia desde
luego sería un avance, lo que pasa que la ley de transparencia yo creo que se ha
planteado por desgracia como una cortina de humo en lugar de cómo un verdadero
ejercicio de abrir ventanas y puertas. Hay que cambiar la cultura democrática de un
119
país para avanzar en un camino de transparencia real, no basta con cambiar una
ley que exija más publicidad de determinados procedimientos o que exija más
conocimiento por parte de la población, sino que hay que hacer un esfuerzo, si se
quiere hacer un esfuerzo, porque la pregunta es si algunos quieren hacerlo, porque
la gente se implique en la democracia y eso no basta con una ley de transparencia
eso hay que hacer un esfuerzo de formación de tu población, de valorización de la
democracia y desde luego si la ley de transparencia podría ser un primer paso, yo
creo sinceramente que si se está debatiendo a puertas cerradas tiene muy poco
de transparente.
Pregunta - ¿Hay algún país que tenga una política de transparencia adecuada y le esté
funcionando? ¿Inglaterra por ejemplo?
Respuesta - Yo creo que los países nórdicos están avanzando ahora, no sé si
Noruega tiene una legislación un poco más avanzada y yo creo que hay ejemplos
en algunos estados que están avanzando, no tengo resultados aquí específicos de
cómo se están evaluando o no, pero yo creo que desde luego la prueba de que hay
países que están mejores que nosotros, como por ejemplo hay sitios como
Alemania que si descubren que alguien ha falseado un CV automáticamente tiene
que dimitir y dejar su cargo, aquí hemos descubierto que el presidente del gobierno
ha mantenido una estrecha relación con un corrupto confeso en tiempos de que se
le estaba juzgando siendo consciente de lo que estaba pasando y ni siquiera ha ido
al parlamento a explicar su relación.
Pregunta - En Inglaterra el ministro de transporte va en metro a trabajar, es decir son
ejemplos…
Respuesta - Claro es eso, bueno también hay una clave fundamental en eso, en
romper es cultura de que los dirigentes de un país son élite que están por encima
de la ciudadanía y que no tienen experiencias habituales como las que tienen sus
vecinos ¿no?, yo creo que esta es una de las quiebras también del modelo
democrático, cuando uno se convierte no en una expresión de la voluntad de su
pueblo y por tanto en alguien que parte de ese pueblo para hacer representante
temporalmente sino que alguien se convierte en una élite que tiene tremendos
privilegios y unas condiciones que superan con creces la dignidad necesaria para
ejercer un cargo público. Yo creo que obviamente los representantes públicos
tienen que tener salarios dignos y facilidades dignas para poder ejercer su función,
pero de ahí a dar el salto y convertiros en élites creo que hay una distancia que
nunca deberíamos haber pasado ¿no? Y que no sea posible encontrar al ministro
120
de la administración actual, ni anterior, ni anterior, ni anterior en restaurantes
comunes sino que cenen en sitios donde las facturas están muy por encima del
salario mínimo interprofesional, pues es una barbaridad.
Pregunta - ¿Cuál sería el sistema impositivo ideal para una futura reforma fiscal en
España?
Respuesta - Desde luego hay datos que yo creo que evidencian por donde hay
que ir, cuando los técnicos de la administración de hacienda y cuando los
subinspectores y sus asociaciones profesionales denuncian que el 75% del fraude
fiscal se produce en las grandes empresas, en los bancos, y en las grandes
multinacionales que suponen exclusivamente un 0,01 % de la aportación
económica a los fondos públicos y sin embargo son el 72% del fraude y esto ni se
percibe ni se le da resolución, pues ese es un camino luchar contra el fraude fiscal
en los ámbitos en los que se produce con mayor facilidad que son las grandes
empresas es una prioridad de cualquier gobierno que tenga una situación
económica delicada de la misma manera que un país donde el 85% del ingreso
tributario lo producen los ingresos de nómina de productividad y no de capital, que
solo están tributando un 15 % pues es otra barbaridad, yo creo que hay que ir a
que paguen más los que más tienen, y sobre todo los que están recibiendo la
riqueza de los trabajadores, no interesa que un trabajador tribute por su salario y no
tiene nada más, una empresa esta tributando por su actividad económica y una
parte la está desviando por sus inversiones, por toda una serie de procedimientos
que hay que acabar con ellos, en definitiva es una cosa básica, que es un modelo
impositivo con más impuestos directos que indirectos y desde luego con unos
impuestos progresivos, lo que no tiene ni pies ni cabezas es que la situación que
está sufriendo este país con 6 millones de parados, un 40 % de jóvenes parados,
un 20% de la población en situación de pobreza, lo que se suba es el IVA que es
un impuesto que pagamos todos igual tengamos un ingreso de 100€ o de 100.000€
y que no se toquen los grandes impuestos y los grandes patrimonios. Como las
SICAV, los impuestos a la banca, como toda una serie de elementos, por lo tanto
obviamente la reforma fiscal tiene que ir en la línea de ir controlando el fraude igual
que se controla a las rentas de producción, a las rentas salariales, eso está
controladísimo si tú haces una declaración de la renta en la que no declares una
parte de tus ingresos rápido te hacen una paralela y te descubren, igual que hay
que controlar el fraude fiscal hay que ir a que paguen más quienes más tienen,
obviamente.
121
Pregunta - Pero eso también está registrado en la constitución española en la cual dice
que los impuestos deben ser progresivos ¿verdad?
Respuesta - Bueno ese quizás es uno de los problemas por lo que ha saltado por
los aires el espíritu de la transición ¿no? Cuando tienes una constitución que dice
que la riqueza de un país debe revertir en el bienestar del colectivo y que debe
estar por encima el interés de lo colectivo de los intereses particulares y de los
poderes públicos, y que debe hacer una política económica que vele porque la
riqueza se distribuya, cuando hay una constitución en la que se dice que el derecho
a la vivienda es un derecho fundamental y que los gobiernos están no solo
permitiendo que se expulse a la personas de sus casas sino impugnando ante al
tribunal constitucional del decreto andaluz sobre los desahucios que trata de
defender a las familias que se expulsa de las viviendas, poniéndose claramente en
defensa de los bancos en lugar de su ciudadanía y cuando los otros partidos hacen
una modificación exprés y sin consulta ciudadana de un artículo que somete toda la
constitución al pago de la deuda de manera que anula el artículo primero que dice
que España es un estado social y de derecho, pero también social y si no podemos
tener dinero para que sea un estado social estamos violando la constitución, ahí es
donde la ciudadanía dice, pues si esta constitución no vale reformémosla, y por eso
parece que no es recomendable el partido socialista que ellos ya tienen diseñada
otra vez la elite y una propuesta de reforma constitucional que llevaran a efecto sin
contar con las bases de la población. Yo creo que cuando un país ha sido atenido
a una constitución que no se ha sido capaz de hacerla cumplir es hay que hacer
un proceso constituyente como está yendo en Latinoamérica y no pasa nada, si
hay que cambiar las reglas del juego en una sociedad no es el fin del mundo, sino
que es el proyecto habitual de sociedades que avanzan democráticamente.
Pregunta - ¿Subir los salarios mínimos? España tiene casi los salarios interprofesionales
más bajos de Europa (728 €) Y las pensiones también, ¿Sería sostenible poder subirlas
con la inestabilidad que tenemos?
Respuesta - Con el tema de las pensiones yo creo que la izquierda nos
equivocamos al permitir debatir si las pensiones son sostenibles o son
insostenibles, una sociedad no debe permitir ni que se piense en dejar tirada a la
población más débil, a la población mayor que ha estado trabajando durante toda
su vida, cotizando y dando su fuerza de trabajo para la riqueza del conjunto del
país. No deberíamos permitir que se debatiera o que se planteara como una opción
dejarlos tirados, o dejarlos sin ingresos. Si ahora mismo no hay fondos para
garantizar las pensiones no es un problema de cuanta gente es pensionista o de
122
cuál es la edad de jubilación, es un problema de que tenemos poca cotización
porque tenemos poco empleo y es esa la prioridad, la prioridad no puede ser dejar
por el camino a quienes llevan 40 o 50 años trabajado, la prioridad tiene que ser
garantizar que hay más trabajo para haya más gente cotizando y que las grandes
empresas coticen más. Y en cuanto al salario mínimo interprofesional, claro, el
problema es cuando los gobiernos deciden olvidar que el sistema capitalista es un
sistema de dominación y de explotación, en el que no hay un justo intercambio de
un contrato en el que unos compran la fuerza trabajo de otros en igualdad de
condiciones, si no que hay un poderoso que el que tiene los medios de producción
que compra a un débil que sólo tiene su fuerza de trabajo, esa fuerza de trabajo y
que en ese intercambio desigual o los poderes públicos protegen a la parte más
débil, o la parte poderosa se aprovecha de esa situación, por lo tanto, desde luego
hay que subir el salario mínimo interprofesional y hay que recuperar una política de
relación laboral en la que los estados protegen a la parte más débil de esa
interrelación y garantizan que el miedo no puede ejercerse como un arma en donde
la gente está dispuesta a vender su fuerza de trabajo casi a precio de saldo.
Porque ese es el problema, que grandes empresarios contratan por 400 € o
contratan en negro o explotan a la gente o les tienen trabajando horas extras que
luego no les pagan porque se lo pueden permitir y los trabajadores no se plantan,
no dicen hasta aquí hemos llegado, no luchan porque no se lo pueden permitir
porque saben que ellos están desprotegidos y saben que si mueven cualquier cosa
ponen en riesgo su vida. Esto es una locura y solo una administración pública
preocupada por sus ciudadanos puede cambiar esa relación.
Pregunta - El Banco Central Europeo, Alemania, el Fondo Monetario Internacional, nos
dice que los salarios son demasiado altos en España porque no es un país productivo
¿Como de podría plantear la productividad de un país sin tener que bajar los salarios?
Otros métodos tiene que haber…
Respuesta - Hombre es curioso que quienes han diseñado el modelo de Europa
en el que a nosotros nos han reservado Los Eurovegas de todo el continente ahora
nos diga que no somos productivos, ahora nosotros no somos productivos porque
ellos han decidido serlo, pero ellos son productivos porque nos venden a nosotros
a bajo salario, entonces lo que no es admisible es esta relación desigual en la que
yo me aprovecho de tus condiciones y además te obligo a que sigas manteniendo
esas condiciones porque no voy a asumir que seas productivo a mi nivel, yo creo
que reconfigurar esta realidad en el conjunto de Europa y desde luego yo creo que
también hay que empezar a plantear que el Banco Central Europeo que está
123
sometido a los intereses de la banca privada y no es un banco público porque no
tiene capacidad de emitir deuda propia, porque no tiene capacidad de prestar a los
estados sino que presta a los bancos, para que los bancos presten con intereses a
10 veces el valor de lo que han recibido en definitiva igual que las rentas son
instituciones que no son democráticas y que por tanto no están orientadas a
distribuir el poder que en última instancia es el valor de la democracia la de la
democracia.
Pregunta - Adam Smith decía que el capital humano es esencial para crear la riqueza de
una nación, en España hay 28.4% de abandono escolar en lo que es la ESO, casi el más
alto de Europa. ¿Cómo cree usted que podemos mejorar esta situación ¿La nueva ley
impuesta por el PP puede mejorarla? ¿O cree usted por lo contrario que no va a mejorar
estas estadísticas tan negativas?
Respuesta - El problema que tiene el partido popular es que su expresión del
neoliberalismo y que no tienen en otros lugares de Europa es que hacen políticas
sin ir a la raíz de los problemas, se utilizan datos objetivos como ese 28% de
fracaso escolar para justificar una reforma que no está interviniendo sobre los
motivos de ese fracaso escolar porque ni siquiera se han analizado ¿no?, si un
estudio en detenimiento del mismo informe de la OECD que nos posiciona en ese
índice de fracaso escolar lo que identifica es que el motivo principal de ese fracaso
escolar es la desigualdad en las condiciones de acceso y las condiciones de
estudio de la población, hay una brecha brutal condicionada por los elementos
socioeconómicos de los alumnos y esa brecha no se interviene para corregirla.
Decía Mandela que la educación es la única herramienta que tienen los pobres
para rebelarse contra los poderosos para dejar de estar dominados, el problema es
que no quiere utilizarse esa herramienta. El modelo finlandés que no solo plantea
que haya que tener un éxito, digamos, en los objetivos escolares si no que hay que
tener un sistema orientado a tener garantizado el éxito individual de cada alumno, y
garantizar el éxito individual de que cada alumno implica conocer las condiciones
de ese alumno y corregirlas para que tenga el máximo desarrollo su potencial y eso
es lo que no se hace en este país no se interviene sobre las desigualdades que
provoca esa desigualdad de condiciones y en los resultados académicos, y
mientras no se intervenga sobre eso, pues seguiremos igual y el modelo de la ley
que se va a imponer por parte del ministro educación Wert no va en ese camino,
sino que va en el camino contrario que es segregar a los alumnos desde el
principio y por tanto es separar a los que ahora están fracasando con los que dejan
de fracasar. Yo no sé si eso va a generar mejores notas en los que no están
124
fracasando lo dudo mucho, pero desde luego lo que no va a producir es una mejora
del resultado de quienes están siendo abandonados, porque ahora lo que hace es
abandonarles antes.
Pregunta - La verdad que lo que ha respondido yo me siento identificado, yo estudié en
España solo EGB, pero mi carrera universitaria y mi Master lo he hecho en Inglaterra. Yo
tengo problemas de sordera y a mi me tuvieron muy abandonado durante mis estudios en
España, no vi ayuda por parte de los profesores. Luego mi familia es granadina y por
niveles económicos nos cambiamos a Mallorca, donde se habla en catalán y me costó
mucho adaptarme a la nueva lengua, la verdad que en mi propio país me pusieron
mucho más dificultades para estudiar que en un país extranjero como Inglaterra.
Respuesta - Claro y el problema es que no se atiende, yo recuerdo, yo soy
educadora social de profesión y cuando estudiaba la carrera en los finales de los
90, pues estudiaba todos los programas que se iniciaron a finales de los 80 con
esta idea, pensando en diversificación educativa, en atender las necesidades
especiales, en respuesta en el aula, en los refuerzos tanto para situaciones como la
tuya que me cuentas, como con situaciones que tienen que ver más con las
condiciones familiares, ¿no? y estos días en los debates en televisión se está
viendo y hay muchos tertulianos planteándome incluso estudiantes de universidad
que lo plantean. No es lo mismo para un estudiante de familia rica preparar un
examen que para un estudiante de familia pobre, no se prepara igual un examen
cuando tienes un cuarto para ti, cuando tus padres son titulados universitarios,
cuando tu familia está rodeada de libros, te ha enseñado a leer desde pequeño te
ha motivado en ese conocimiento que cuando tienes una familia numerosa que vive
en un piso de 60 m2 de Vallecas y tienes que compartir tu cuarto con 3 hermanos,
y no hay un solo libro porque no te lo puedes pagar y tienes que ir a la biblioteca
pública, con lo cual estudias en los horarios que puedes, y si además de eso tienes
que trabajar una parte de tu jornada porque tus padres no pueden y te tienes que
pagar tu matrícula universitaria, porque ni hay becas o se suben los precios de las
mismas, al final lo que estamos diciendo es que una persona que tiene unas
condiciones económicas inferiores para llegar al mismo resultado tiene que hacer
10 veces más esfuerzo, y esto obviamente es una vergüenza en un país
democrático, y además es una cosa que educativamente se lleva estudiando desde
los años 80, o sea yo te repito yo soy educadora de profesión y esto cuando
estudiábamos, estudiábamos como influían las condiciones socioeconómicas y
familiares en el resultado académico, en el desarrollo personal de la persona, en
las capacidades cognitivas, y claro que influye, influye una barbaridad. El simple
125
hecho de leer, los hijos de familias ricas que sus padres son universitarios aprender
a leer mucho antes, porque sus padres leen periódicos habitualmente, porque ven
libros habitualmente, porque los tienen en casa, porque les motivan, porque leen
con ellos. Una familia de no universitarios que no tienen hábito de lectura no se lo
trasladan a los hijos, y eso, si queremos una sociedad desarrollada pues hay que
compensarlo desde el estado, no queda otra.
Pregunta - La cuestionable eficiencia de la actual reforma laboral impuesta por el actual
gobierno, España tenia cinco millones de parados antes de la introducción de la reforma
labora y actualmente supera los seis millones, ¿Está siendo un fracaso?, ¿Cómo se podría
mejorar esa reforma laboral para que creara empleo?
Respuesta - El problema de las reformas laborales en este país de las cinco que
ha habido ya sean del PP o del PSOE es que ha seguido creyendo en la denuncia
constate de los sindicatos que las leyes configuran el mercado laboral, no es así,
el mercado laboral lo configura el sistema productivo de un país, entonces cuando
tú tienes un sistema productivo basado exclusivamente en el ladrillo, lo que tienes
es un sistema productivo precario porque es un sector precarizado y lo único que
pueden hacer las leyes laborales al respecto del sistema productivo es garantizar
mejores o peores condiciones de la parte débil de la relación que es el empleado y
desde luego todas las reformas que han ignorado intervenir sobre el sistema
productivo y todas las reformas han retrocedido en proteger los derechos de los
más débiles. Esta última es el remate, yo vengo esta mañana de los juzgados de la
Comunidad de Madrid, donde como se han suspendido todos los convenios pues
ahora es el caos, y la relación laboral depende del jefe de turno depende
concederte ciertas prerrogativas que antes estaban reflejadas en convenio, y esto
es un sector que es un sector público que tenía unas condiciones inmejorables,
imagínate la hostelería, la mecánica, los obradores, los constructores, los
conductores… Hay toda una población que esta desprotegida y que su empresario
puede hacer exactamente lo que le dé la gana, esto no genera empleo sino que lo
destruye porque es una estupidez pensar que si flexibilizas las condiciones del
despido van a producir trabajo, no eso van a producir más despidos, si me sale
más barato voy a despedir más, ¿Voy a contratar más? No, no tengo ninguna
necesidad, yo pienso que es una locura y hay que volver atrás pero sobre es
importante incidir que la legislación laboral sirve para defender a la parte más débil
pero no sirve para generar más empleo ni sirve para modificar el sistema
productivo.
126
Pregunta - En teoría las empresas privadas resultan ser mas eficientes y efectivas dado el
entorno donde se desarrollan que las empresas publicas. ¿Cuál seria el sentido de
nacionalizar los sectores estratégicos?
Respuesta - Yo creo que sí, que la clave fundamental en la situación de los países
del sur de Europa es que no tenemos soberanía, y no tenemos soberanía porque
se la hemos cedido a Europa y se ve claramente en el ámbito económico, y por
tanto hay que recuperar la capacidad de tomar decisiones sobre la economía. Lo
de nacionalizar la banca pública que se preocupara por garantizar el crédito, por
garantizar el bienestar de la ciudadanía, por la inversión pública, garantizaría que
hay un criterio que prioriza los intereses de la sociedad frente a los beneficios
empresariales, eso en el caso de los financieros. Y en el caso de las energéticas es
mucho más importante, fíjate en el caso de las energéticas no es solo es una
cuestión de lo imprescindible sino que en el mundo actual supone el acceso a la
energía para unas condiciones dignas de vida, sino que además hay un aspecto
que es el impacto medioambiental que genera la producción o la extracción de
determinados sistemas energéticos o de la apuesta por un modelo o por otro, y eso
es algo que le debemos a las generaciones futuras. Si una empresa tiene que
pensar en lo que le es de mejor interés va a pensar a corto plazo, a una empresa
no le interesa si en el año 2050 va a tener mucho beneficio porque ha hecho una
apuesta energética. Por tanto, los elementos estratégicos no solo garantizan los
derechos fundamentales sino el bienestar de la sociedad que ya es bastante, sino
que además garantizan que la producción y las explotación energética sea acuerdo
a los criterios sostenibles para el futuro de las generaciones. Yo creo que en este
país es una cosa clave, no se entiende que haya más paneles solares en Noruega
que en España, cuando aquí las horas de sol son mucho más productivas, no se
entiende que haya comunidades que hayan decido apostar por huertos solares y
producción de la energía limpia, y en cambio en la Comunidad de Madrid no hay ni
uno sólo porque se ha decido se pueden instalar paneles en determinados edificios
y con unos índices de productividad energética. Eso cualquiera que lo piense es un
plan que no responde al interés colectivo, responde a los intereses de las grandes
empresas enérgicas que quieren seguir haciendo negocios, por tanto los sectores
estratégicos tienen que estar en manos del estado, porque sólo el Estado podrá
garantizar que lo que rige su productividad, su producción y su producción es el
interés de la sociedad y no el de sus propietarios.
127
Pregunta - Una última pregunta; más del 99% de las empresas españolas son pymes, las
cuales son el motor para mantener y generar trabajo. La banca privada utiliza la mayoría
de los activos dados por la Comunidad Europea para su propio saneamiento dejando a las
empresas desprovistas del crédito necesario para su desarrollo. ¿Se debería exigir a la
banca mas solidaridad con las pymes o se debería crear una banca publica que vele por
este propósito?
Respuesta - Desde luego si hubiera una banca pública, la prioridad de la banca
pública sería esa , garantizar la viabilidad del crédito para dar a las familias y para
las empresas que generan trabajo porque son más débiles y están más
desprotegidas, en este país efectivamente solo el 1.1% de las empresas
impositivas son grandes empresas, la mayoría son pequeñas empresas, pequeños
comercios y ahí no solo el tema de la banca, hay que empezar a pensar bueno,
que la apuesta liberadora en sectores como comercio hace polvo a las pequeñas
empresas y a los pequeños negocios; los retrasos de los pagos, el volumen de
empresas que se están cerrando en este país es una pasada, yo creo que las
legislaciones que se han iniciado para emprendedores y a favor de pequeñas
empresas creo que se quedan muy cortas y que hay que empezar a tomarse muy
enserio que esas empresas son las que realmente producen el mayor número de
puestos en este país y por tanto lo que son necesitan garantías económicas,
viabilidad de crédito adaptado a sus condiciones de pequeñas empresas y
sistemas impositivos un poco acorde con el sitio económico de sus propias
empresas, no pueden ser que tengan más beneficios fiscales las grandes
empresas que un pequeño negocio de barrio que se está dejando los cuernos para
sacar adelante, y a lo mejor da trabajo a una familia, a dos o a tres, que hay
algunos que llegan a ese nivel.
-Pues muchas gracias eso es todo.
128
Entrevista 2: Juan Torres López
Pregunta - ¿Cuáles cree usted que han sido los detonantes de la crisis económica
española?
Respuesta – Pues básicamente dos por una parte el impacto de la crisis
económica internacional y por otro lado la crisis de un modelo productivo basado
en el sector inmobiliario en donde se había producido una burbuja muy grande que
termino finalmente estallando.
Pregunta - ¿Entonces no hemos vivido por encima de nuestras posibilidades como nos
quieren hacer creer?
Respuesta – No hombre, eso es una manera de hablar un poco absurda, no
significa nada eso es una manera de hablar es un juicio moral el que lleva la
culpabilidad de la gente.
Pregunta - ¿Cuál es la correlación entre la crisis económica y crisis política e institucional
española?
Respuesta – Bueno, siempre ha habido crisis política, pero lo ocurre es que la
crisis genera también un espacio de confrontación social por que lógicamente los
diferentes grupos sociales tratan de darle una salida diferente y entonces están
digamos los grupos dominantes, los grupos de más poder financiero y económico
están tratando y consiguiendo imponer una respuesta a la crisis muy contrarias a
las preferencias de la inmensa mayoría de la sociedad, entonces se creen que para
conseguirlo tienen que situarse fuera de esas preferencias y por lo tanto pues al
margen de la representatividad política y eso provoca la crisis de la democracia en
la que estamos.
Pregunta - ¿Es legitima y sostenible la deuda española respecto a sus acreedores, o bien
se debería renegociar o dejar transitoriamente de pagar?.
Respuesta – En primer lugar lo que habría que hacer es analizarla, ver
efectivamente de donde procede y ver si hay razones para repudiarla. Yo creo que
las hay, sobre todo porque yo creo que es una evidencia que gran parte de esta
deuda es una deuda que está provocada por manipulaciones de algunos
mercados, especuladores y sobre todo porque tiene una componente fundamental
que son los de gastos financieros, los intereses, que se podían dedicar
perfectamente si se hubiera deseado que no tuvieran tanto privilegio los bancos
privados.
129
Pregunta - ¿Se debería hacer una auditoria?
Respuesta – Si exactamente... debería auditarse
Pregunta - ¿Tendría España consecuencias negativas impuestas por Europa en el caso
de impago de la deuda?
Respuesta – Bueno lógicamente de Europa no, pero si algunos acreedores, pero
siempre que hay un pulso, un conflicto, las partes toman fuerza entonces
consecuencias habría claro, si los especuladores, los que sacan dinero con esto
lógicamente no iban a que quedarse de brazos cruzados lo que habría que hacer
sería negociar un argumento y una fortaleza social y política y hacer frente a eso.
Pregunta - ¿Sería viable una salida de España del euro?
Respuesta – Vamos porque no va a ser viable, nada está escrito, lógicamente
sería muy problemático, conllevaría muchos problemas, yo no sé si más o menos
que lo que está provocando mantenernos dentro que es algo insufrible pero como
por supuesto cualquier otra decisión social por supuesto tendría.
Pregunta - ¿Sobre las políticas de austeridad impuestas por Europa, son medidas
acertadas o por lo contrario atentan contra el estado de bienestar español?
Respuesta – Bueno yo creo que sobre las medidas que corresponde o que
interesa a los grandes grupos financieros, a los grandes empresariales que tienen
su influencia política, que tienen gobiernos a su servicio que logran dominarlos y
que por lo tanto llevan a cabo lo que les interesa a ellos. Es lo que tenemos y es lo
que habría que combatir, es decir lograr que la ciudadanía tuviera fuerza y lograr
que la ciudadanía pudiera imponer su voluntad sobre la de estos grupos
minoritarios por muy poderosos que sean.
Pregunta - Usted ha dicho en más de una ocasión que una tasa alta de paro beneficia a
los gobiernos capitalistas y a las grandes empresas ¿En que se basa usted para tener
esta opinión?
Respuesta – Pues lógicamente por que el desempleo, cualquiera que lo haya
padecido sabe perfectamente, que debilita a las clases trabajadoras, cuando
alguien se encuentra en paro lo único que busca es que haya trabajo cómo sea,
aceptar trabajo que sea las condiciones que le impongan, entonces lógicamente el
desempleo por esa razón debilita y se apodera de las clases trabajadoras.
130
Pregunta - ¿Cuál sería un sistema impositivo ideal para una futura reforma fiscal en
España?
Respuesta – Bueno es que no hay en realidad políticas ideales hay características
que se aproximan más o menos a determinadas preferencias sociales. Si son
rentistas o un especulador financiero consideraría que el sistema fiscal ideal sería
el que no grava a las rentas de capital o las rentas de especulación financiera. Si
soy trabajador pediría que el sistema fiscal fuera el que fuera más generoso con
mis rentas, entonces creo que el sistema fiscal es la expresión de una lucha de
clases, es la expresión del conflicto que hay en la sociedad y se traduce en las
formulas de política fiscal que benefician a unos o a otros.
Pregunta - Sobre el salario, España tiene un salario mínimo de 728 Euros, casi el más
bajo de toda Europa y las pensiones también están muy por debajo de la media europea
¿Resultaría viable subir el salario mínimo interprofesional y las pensiones ante la situación
de inestabilidad económica actual?.
Respuesta – Es que sería una manera de salir de la crisis porque, en la que
estamos hundidos porque hay una escasez de demanda porque los salarios son
muy bajos, para que saliéramos de la crisis haría falta aumentar el ingreso,
aumentar la demanda, incrementar el consumo y por lo tanto para ello sería
absolutamente necesario aumentar el salario mínimo.
Pregunta - El salario mínimo interprofesional ha decrecido en los últimos años con la
excusa de no ser lo suficientemente productivo con respecto a Europa. ¿Cómo España
podría ser mas productiva sin el perjuicio de rebajar los salarios de los trabajadores?.
Respuesta – Primero el concepto de productividad utilizado en general para toda
la economía es un absurdo, porque hay que aplicarlo a diferentes actividades. Un
peluquero alemán es igual de productivo que un peluquero español, o un camarero
alemán no creo que sea más productivo que un camarero español. Lo hay que
diferenciar según las actividades económicas. Que ocurre, en algunos países que
tienen una mayor cantidad adquirida, tiene efecto que es más productivo porque
tienen mayor valor añadido, componentes de innovación y de tecnología por lo
tanto lo que habría que hacer sería aumentar el espacio en que esos sectores
tienen en la economía española.
131
Pregunta - El capital humano es esencial para crear riqueza en una nación, por lo que
unos de los pilares a mantener y desarrollar es el sistema educativo publico. ¿Cuál seria el
marco ideal de la reforma de un sistema educativo deficitario debido al alto fracaso
estudiantil en enseñanzas medias y la inefectividad de las universidades españolas que no
propician la adecuada inserción al mercado laboral?
Respuesta – Falla inversión y sobre todo recursos ¿no? Para que tenga más
éxitos. Hay que tener en cuenta que en el sistema educativo español se han
incorporado en los últimos 30 años una cohorte de personas inmensa, se ha
incorporado mucha gente al sistema educativo y por lo tanto es normal que haya
muchas dificultades.
Yo creo que hace falta más recursos, más atención, más profesores, también más
cultura en el medioambiente porque eso influye mucho, el entorno familiar, social
influye mucho en el éxito educativo. Y creo que esto también hay que apoyarlo y
básicamente eso lo que hace que tengamos el 28% de fracaso escolar.
Pregunta - La cuestionable eficiencia de la actual reforma laboral impuesta por el actual
gobierno, España tenia cinco millones de parados antes de la introducción de la reforma
labora y actualmente supera los seis millones, ¿Está siendo un fracaso?, ¿Cómo se podría
mejorar esa reforma laboral para que creara empleo?
Respuesta – Bueno es que no ha sido un fracaso, ha sido un éxito para lo que
pretendían, eliminar derechos y eliminar la capacidad de negociación clásica de los
trabajadores, y despedir con más facilidad las empresas, ha sido un éxito eso es lo
que se buscaba con esa reforma y lo han conseguido.
Pregunta - Pero, nos la habían vendido que era para crear más empleo, ser más
productivos y mas competitivos. ¿No?
Respuesta – Ellos mismos sabían que no se iba a conseguir eso…
Pregunta - En teoría las empresas privadas resultan ser mas eficientes y efectivas dado el
entorno donde se desarrollan que las empresas publicas. ¿Cuál seria el sentido de
nacionalizar los sectores estratégicos?
Respuesta – Bueno es que hay sectores por los que no hay que tener beneficio,
pero vamos si algunos lo tienen en el ámbito privado también lo tendrían en el
público, lo tenían antes o sea que podrían ser igual de rentables o más.
132
Pregunta - Mas del 99% de las empresas españolas son pymes, las cuales son el motor
para mantener y generar trabajo. La banca privada utiliza la mayoría de los activos dados
por Comunidad Europea para su propio saneamiento dejando a las empresas desprovistas
del crédito necesario para su desarrollo. ¿Se debería exigir a la banca mas solidaridad con
las pymes o se debería crear una banca publica que vele por este propósito?
Respuesta – Bueno las pymes son las que más empleo crean y por lo tanto hay
que cuidarla, lo que pasa ahora es que efectivamente se la maltrata y no permite
que se cree mercado interno algo que es fundamental que hagan es que
efectivamente es que la pequeña y mediana empresa tenga más apoyo y una
presencia mucho más grande en la economía española
Pregunta - Como podemos ser más competitivos se quejan de que no somos un país
competitivo ¿qué deberíamos mejorar? ¿Qué pilares son básicos para mejorar nuestra
competitividad?
Respuesta – Bueno no es exactamente es verdad eso, la competitividad también
es otro concepto absolutamente falto de rigor, eso es un concepto que se usa para
todo y que hay que ponerlo en su sitio, ¿no? si la competitividad si se entiende
como la mejor capacidad de vender fuera, nos sufre el cinismo, porque no toda la
economía tiene que estar volcada hacia exterior y bueno en todo caso podemos
mirar como son los países que son más competitivos en nuestro entorno como es
el caso de Suecia, Dinamarca, en Holanda que son muy competitivos y vemos
como están funcionando y cómo estamos funcionando nosotros. Entonces claro
hay diferentes maneras de hacer frente a la competitividad, puede ser una
competitividad a través de la innovación, de la calidad y otra competitividad a
través del empobrecimiento de los salarios cada día más bajos. Es evidente que
eso no tiene los mismos resultados ¿no?
Pregunta - Últimamente el ministro de economía nos ha dicho que hay datos que
estamos saliendo de la crisis, ¿usted ve algunos datos que de verdad a corto plazo
vayamos a mejorar?
Respuesta – No, no se lo cree ni él tampoco, lo dice para engañar a la gente,
llevando diciendo eso tres o cuatro años pero no tiene nada que ver con lo que
está pasando, de verdad.
133
Pregunta - No sabe usted más o menos, no hay ningunos datos que indiquen más o
menos cuánto va a durar la crisis...
Respuesta – No, no, no estamos todavía... además lo importante no es cuándo
vamos a salir si no cómo vamos a salir ¿no?
- Muchas gracias, eso era todo.
134
Entrevista 3: Movimiento 15M Pregunta - ¿Cuáles son los principales ideales del Movimiento 15M?
Respuesta - Pues la primera idea es el lema que surgió en la manifestación, es
que no somos mercancías en manos de políticos ni de banqueros, que al fin y al
cabo era una propuesta del bipartidismo en manos de la banca.
Pregunta - ¿Cuáles son los detonantes de la crisis económica española y sus similitudes y
diferencias con respecto a la crisis de otros países europeos?
Respuesta - En mi opinión la crisis es el planteamiento que viene mucho más
atrás de lo que creemos, la crisis de valores fue el salto a la economía financiera
en España , el endeudamiento, la burbuja inmobiliaria, etc.…Yo creo que viene de
la economía financiera, una crisis del capitalismo.
Pregunta - Entonces la idea de que hemos vivido por encima de nuestras posibilidades es
mentira ¿No?
Respuesta - No, realmente no, si no cobras bastante dinero, si no tienes un sueldo
decente para poder tener un bien básico como una vivienda, si eso es vivir por
encima de tus posibilidades tener una vivienda, e irte de vacaciones diez días al
año. No creo, alguno habrá vivido por encima de sus posibilidades pero la mayoría
de la gente no, si no tienes un sueldo decente, entonces necesitas recurrir al
crédito y cuando necesitas recurrir al crédito tu sueldo está embargado por un
banco, los hechos están ahí.
Pregunta - ¿Es legitima y sostenible la deuda española respecto a sus acreedores, o bien
se debería renegociar o dejar transitoriamente de pagar?
Respuesta - Yo creo eso, primero una gran parte de la deuda es ilegitima y
segundo no nos pertenece a los españoles si no a las empresas privadas, que han
estado jugando el dinero, lo que no se puede hacer es privatizar los beneficios y
socializar las pérdidas, entonces la mayor parte de la deuda que tiene España
como estado, como nación es ilegitima, porque pertenece a distintas entidades
financieras; lo que se debe hacer a mi punto de vista es declararla ilegitima no
pagarla.
135
Pregunta - ¿Cuáles serian las consecuencias negativas impuestas por Europa en el caso
de impago de la deuda y si esto seria un mal menor para la recuperación economia del
país?
Respuesta - Pero bueno, eso es otra muestra de la falta de democracia, de la falta
de transparencia de la Unión Europea, nosotros estamos en un parlamento
europeo poco representativo en el que de por si España tiene un peso medio, pero
de todas formas de la mayor parte de las leyes están detrás empresas privadas y
están hechas a medidas de empresas privadas, es una falta total de democracia de
la Unión Europea. Que otra Unión Europea esta no nos vale, salgámonos o
cambiemos la Unión Europea. Podríamos salir o cambiar la Unión Europea lo que
no nos sirve es esto, quedarnos, no nos vale una sociedad europea con todos
problemas nuestros, problemas de los griegos, problema de los alemanes, que
están a empezando a decaer otra vez, siempre tambaleándose, los ciudadanos de
a pie no tenemos capacidad de democracia, porque estamos gobernados por las
corporaciones , de todas formas no soy economista, pero gente economistas dice
que esta Unión Europea no, no se podría controlar el nivel de juego que tienes en
la Unión Europea, por ejemplo Noruega, Suiza. Europa es una cosa relativamente
reciente.
Pregunta - ¿Sobre las políticas de austeridad impuestas por Europa, son medidas
acertadas o por el contrario atentan contra el estado bienestar español?
Respuesta - Por mi parte estoy en contra, primero esas medidas de austeridad lo
que están haciendo es están repercutiendo en la vida de la mayor parte de la
población, por otro lado esas medidas son totalmente injustas, lo que están
haciendo es intentar ver que la privatización del estado del bienestar, es una
decisión política. España tiene uno de los sistemas de salud más barato y eficiente
de Europa, el tan alabado el sistema americano de salud y luego nosotros
tenemos más sanidad y mas esperanza de vida que ya se está empezando a notar
decrecer con los recortes, ya hay consecuencias con los recortes, creciendo la
mortalidad. Es que la gente no se pude permitir cosas tan básicas como
medicamentos, gente se está quitando de comer para pagar los medicamentos, no
nos están dejando elegir que medicamentos compramos, no solo a nosotros como
clientes si no que los hospitales mismo no tienen capacidad de decidir, quitar el
mínimo, no tienes posibilidad de decisión, no quieren ni siquiera gastarse….luego
los impuestos…. Hay compañías que tienen mucha relación con los miembros del
gobierno, son cosas que te hacen ver que no son decisiones políticas, ni siquiera
económicas.
136
Pregunta - ¿Cuáles serian los pasos efectivos a seguir para una reforma de la ley
electoral?
Respuesta - Pues no sé, ahí es donde queremos acabar ya el juego que es para
decir que estado queremos, que Europa queremos, que medidas podemos tener
para que no vuelva a pasar lo que está pasando ahora. Lo que no podemos tener
es a un presidente del tribunal supremo, que está afiliado a un partido político, no
podemos tener esa mierda de falsa independencia de poderes. No podemos tener
tampoco la Unión Europea que está totalmente al servicio de las corporaciones
está clarísimo que todos los miembros de las ejecutivas anteriores han acabado
trabajando para la eléctrica, lo que más pagamos los españoles en la factura de la
luz, son deudas inventadas de la compañía eléctrica. Te hace ver que debemos
establecer un nuevo sistema de juego, no sé, mi punto de vista, yo no soy
comunista, ni, pero sí creo que debemos ver algo que supere a la economía
financiera y trabajar más con la economía real, lo que se está haciendo es sacar un
dinero falso que surge del a nada, que se desembolsa un montón de pasta todo lo
del mundo, y al final lo que tenemos son macro empresas que están chupando del
sistema público, dinero de todos; cuando ese dinero debería ser organizado de
otra forma que nosotros queramos tener que nos repercuta a todos. Cuando una
empresa pública tenga beneficios no nos vuelva a repercutir, en las cosas que nos
pertenecen a todos, no digo que todas las empresas deberían ser públicas, pero
ahora mismo lo que se está haciendo es sacar dinero de la pública y dárselo a los
que tienen ya de por sí mucho dinero, creo primero un proceso sustituyente y
luego un proceso constituyente…y a partir de ahí decidir que España queremos y
que Europa queremos.
Pregunta - ¿Cuál seria el sistema electoral ‘perfecto’ o posible frente al bipartidismo
actual?
Respuesta - Pues vaya no solo una ley de transparencia sino que también que no
prescriban los derechos de corrupción me parece una de las cosas más urgentes
que hay que cambiar. Que se destituya a cualquier persona que esté en un
proceso, por honestidad la idea sería que surgiera de la persona, pero que si no
que fuera obligatorio por ley, lo que no pueden tener es impunidad y luego no
sabemos que ahora mismo, había una elecciones nueva, el PSOE y PP están en
bajos históricos, que quien venga nos sé que va a pasar, el sistema electoral ya
está agotado, de todas formas el sistema electoral beneficia a estos grandes
partidos.
137
Pregunta - ¿Qué medidas se debería incluir en una ley de transparencia que luche contra
la corrupción política y económica?
Respuesta - Una persecución en serio y en cuerpo de inspectores a las grandes
empresas, porque la mayor parte de la corrupción fiscal viene de las grandes
empresas, se debería perseguir el fraude fiscal tendríamos más dinero que ahora
podría ayudar bastante lo que pasa es que no interesa.
Pregunta - ¿Ayudaría a poder mantener las pensiones, que es unos de los problemas que
tiene España?
Pregunta - Bueno ayudaría un poco a todo, no es la solución universal, pero
también ayudaría a la gente a pagar los impuestos porque dicen, es que los
grandes roban más y es verdad. Con qué autoridad moral le vas a decir a un
autónomo que tiene el agua al cuello, cuando normalmente el pequeño empresario
o autónomo paga religiosamente y luego un gran empresario está robando a lo
grande y no le pasa nada. Con qué autoridad moral le vas a decir que se va
aquedar €50 cuando hay gente que se está embolsando millones. Yo creo que
serviría para dar un poco de moralidad a la sociedad.
Pregunta - El Banco Central Europeo, Alemania, el Fondo Monetario Internacional, nos
dice que los salarios son demasiado altos en España porque no es un país productivo
¿Como de podría plantear la productividad de un país sin tener que bajar los salarios?
Otros métodos tiene que haber…
Respuesta - Es que es mentira, la productividad, aunque trabajáramos 17 horas
no seriamos productivos, a mi punto de vista es un proceso que se han sacado de
la manga, lo único que veo es que la gente trabaja duro, ¿qué es ser productivo?
¿Es una palabra con la que se llenan la boca, pero que es? Para qué debemos
trabajar más horas, cuando hay tanto paro, hay seis millones de parados, ¿por qué
no se le reducen horas a la gente? ¿Por qué no se reparten? Así la gente puede
tener más tiempo, puede consumir, estar menos cansados, si las personas
trabajaran menos horas sería mejor, cuando se trabaja muchas horas tienes más
accidentes te pones mas enfermo, seria cobrar un sueldo decente, y menos horas
de trabajo.
Pregunta - ¿Resultaría viable subir el salario mínimo interprofesional y las pensiones
como dice su programa ante la situación de inestabilidad económica actual?
Respuesta - Claro que si, Francia ahí lo tienes y no estamos tan mal hasta ahora,
si sube el sueldo mínimo, sube el consumo, si todas las personas cobraran 1000
138
euros al mes…El salario mínimo de España es bastante más bajo que los países
nórdicos, se debería subir el sueldo mínimo, esas personas tendrían más poder
adquisitivo y por lo tanto podrían gastar más, entonces sería mejor según la lógica
capitalista.
Pregunta - Adam Smith decía que el capital humano es esencial para crear la riqueza de
una nación, en España hay 28.4% de abandono escolar en lo que es la ESO, casi el más
alto de Europa. ¿Cómo cree usted que podemos mejorar esta situación ¿La nueva ley
impuesta por el PP puede mejorarla? ¿O cree usted que no va a mejorar estas
estadísticas tan negativas?
Respuesta - Esto es mas complicado, partimos de que hemos sido un país más
pobre, tenemos un acceso a la cultura muy limitado, la cultura que se ofrece en las
colegios es la cultura de la clase media alta donde los niños no se sienten
identificados, quiero decir que tenemos que cambiar la forma en la que damos
clase en los colegios, está clarísimo. Hay que hacer otra escuela pública, hay una
mierda de inversión en la escuela pública cuando se han invertido montones de
dinero en obras faraónicas, si hubiéramos invertido más en la escuela pública y
tuviéramos más formación del profesorado bajaría el fracaso escolar. La
universidad lo primero no tiene que enseñar cómo trabaja una empresa, se tiene
que enseñar a como pensar y a ser capaz tu de aprender lo que vas a hacer en el
futuro, Primero hay que enseñar al profesor el profesor está anticuado, no tiene
porque enseñar todas las maquinas de Samsung pero enseñarte como funcionan,
te tiene que dar la estrategia y la forma de aprender, sobe todo un trasfondo. La
universidad no tiene que ser la escuela de formación de las empresas, de hecho
las empresas no invierten una mierda en formación, y deberían ser las primeras
que den la capacidad de enseñar a la gente, que luego las becas que dan, no les
tiene que ir tan mal a los estudiantes cuando ya empiezan a trabajar como
personas normales, cuando en teoría deberías tener un tutor. Aunque hay un
fracaso escolar enorme la universidad española a nivel científico es una de las más
reconocidas, ha estado es los últimos años muy bien, un gran avance científico que
no habíamos tenido nunca, pero le han cortado la financiación, se tienen que
cambiar formas de la universidad, cátedras inamovibles, una universidad mas
social y democrática.
Pregunta - ¿Qué estudios académicos tiene usted?
Respuesta - Técnico superior en administración del sistema informático, filología
inglesa, máster de educación, ahora estoy preparando un doctorado.
139
Pregunta - ¿Debería España invertir mas en investigación y innovación?
Respuesta - Está saliendo un artículo sobre la falacia de la rentabilidad de
inversión y el desarrollo, todo lo que se investiga más tarde o más temprano va a
acabar dando frutos sobre todo en ciencia y luego en formación humanística
también. No debemos cortar los gasto de investigación, tiene que haber un control,
lo que más vale hoy en día es la Viagra y las grandes revistas de investigación
están financiadas por las grandes empresas farmacéuticas igual que la economía
siempre financiada por grandes entidades y sino no te publican, te están coartando
tu libertad para investigar porque lo que prima en investigación, es mientras más
investigaciones hagas mejor, no se pude evaluar por ese parámetro, tiene que ser
una empresa externa, necesitamos más democracia y más participación.
Pregunta - La cuestionable eficiencia de la actual reforma laboral impuesta por el actual
gobierno, España tenia cinco millones de parados antes de la introducción de la reforma
labora y actualmente supera los seis millones, ¿Está siendo un fracaso?, ¿Cómo se podría
mejorar esa reforma laboral para que creara empleo?
Respuesta - La gran pregunta! Se debe innovar de verdad, innovar en tecnologías
renovables España es el país de Europa que mas sol tiene, invertir en tecnologías
renovables, invertir en cosas que no hay, si estamos en este mundo posindustrial
que se han llevado todo a países del tercer mundo donde no hay derechos
laborales, pues deberíamos dedicarnos a investigar. La ciencia es fundamental, un
mejor reparto laboral, ahora mismo como estamos necesitamos una renta básica
para que la gente no se muera de hambre y la gente con una renta básica, con sus
necesidades básicas cubiertas no va a coger un trabajo de mierda que se le ofrece
, con un mal sueldo que le cuesta de su salud y su felicidad, reducir las horas de
trabajo y subir el salario mínimo, todo lo contrario a lo que se está haciendo ahora,
y luego una protección al trabajador mayor, facilitar a las empresas que cree
empleo, dar seguridad, si no hay seguridad no hay confianza a la hora de
consumir, seguir avanzando en derechos sociales no retrocediendo.
Pregunta - En teoría las empresas privadas resultan ser mas eficientes y efectivas dado el
entorno donde se desarrollan que las empresas publicas. ¿Cuál seria el sentido de
nacionalizar los sectores estratégicos?
Repuesta - Pues eso todo es de todos, el agua es de todos no tiene dueño, es de
los españoles y el sol no es de nadie ni la tierra tampoco, esos sectores que todos
nos beneficiamos y hacemos uso, eso tiene que ser común, se tiene que ver la
140
forma tiene que haber una banca pública que financie las iniciativas de la gente,
creo que va a ser más barato todo, debería ser nacionalizado tenemos la luz más
cara de Europa, esto es debido a una política neoliberal impuesta por nuestro
gobierno. Se debería nacionalizar los sectores estratégicos mínimo, las grandes
empresas que están cayendo que parecen rentable, podrían pasar a ser
cooperativa, se puede hacer de otra manera que no sea nacionalizarlo, la
cooperativa por ejemplo Mondragón, hay cosas como Eroski que están controlados
por sus propios trabajadores.
Pregunta – El del 99% de las empresas españolas son pymes, las cuales son el motor
para mantener y generar trabajo. La banca privada utiliza la mayoría de los activos dados
por Comunidad Europea para su propio saneamiento dejando a las empresas desprovistas
del crédito necesario para su desarrollo. ¿Se debería exigir a la banca mas solidaridad con
las pymes o se debería crear una banca publica que vele por este propósito?
Respuesta - Yo trabajaba en una pyme y no tenia manera de financiarse, estaba
controlado por una familia y al final la compro una gran empresa, por eso no les
interesa, está claro que hay que ayudar a que la gente tenga control sobre su
propio trabajo, luego las pymes son las que mejor condiciones laborales dan a sus
trabajadores, no en el sueldo pero si en condiciones y en calidad de vida. Hay que
ayudar a las pymes, quizás por ley, sino que el gobierno cree cosas para
ayudarles, los banco pueden decidir lo que hacen con su dinero..
Pregunta - ¿Qué efectos tendrá la fuga de celebros que esta sufriendo el país?
Respuesta - Si somos la generación que mejor formación tenemos y es que te
mueres de hambre, tengo 27 años y estoy viviendo con mis padres, no te da el
sueldo para desarrollarte como persona. Es que tienes que irte fuera, no es que se
viva mucho mejor pero un poquito si, pero tienes que vivir lejos de los tuyos y de tu
barrio, de tu gente, y se están creando dramas familiares que ya es a nivel
personal y a nivel económico, no sé qué modelo de país quieren pero será el
geriátrico de Europa. Que nos iremos todos y se quedaran ellos, yo me quedo en
España a luchar, me quedo aquí porque lo que están al poder no están jodiendo el
futuro a nosotros y a nuestros padres, tenemos la necesidad de vivir bien, no culpo
a nadie que se quiera ir. Es normal.
No soy economista, soy una persona que se preocupa.
141
Entrevista 4: Jorge A. Calvo Pazos
Pregunta - ¿Cuáles cree usted que son los detonantes de la crisis económica española y
sus similitudes y diferencias con respecto a la crisis de otros países europeos?
Respuesta - ¡Vamos a ver! la crisis económica española y similitudes con respecto
a la crisis de otros países yo lo que creo es que la gente tiene una idea equivocada
de lo que son las crisis en el funcionamiento del sistema capitalista, la gente piensa
que, que hay periodos de bonanza en el funcionamiento del sistema capitalista y
esos periodos de bonanza se ven interrumpidos por crisis puntuales que se deben
a funcionamientos de mercado o situaciones varias. Pero bueno, lo que pretende el
capitalismo es la concentración del capital en cada vez menos manos por eso hay
menos ricos que tienen cada vez más dinero y mas diferencia entre los ricos y los
que no lo son.
Pregunta - ¿Por qué no se ha notado tanto la crisis aquí en Inglaterra tanto comparado
con España?
Respuesta - Pues porque en España lo que pasa es tiene unas características
especificas que en aquí no las hay y en otros países no las había. En España baso
su modelo en la construcción desde que llegó Aznar y con la ley del suelo, pues
que los bancos prestaban dinero a las constructoras para que construyeran y en
teoría cuanto más tienes de un bien, si tienes muchísimas patatas el precio de las
patatas baja, si tienes muchísimos tomates el precio de los tomates bajan y si
tienes muchísimas viviendas no es posible que el precio de la vivienda no baje,
tendría que haber bajado, ahí fue donde… y no bajaba y decían que no iba a bajar
además ahí es donde se infló la burbuja inmobiliaria y entonces las constructoras
estaban construyendo mucho. Bueno se basó el modelo productivo español en la
construcción. Cuando estalla la crisis financiera que tiene su origen en Estados
Unidos lo que estaban haciendo en las corporaciones en el 2009 eran pasarse una
patata caliente, tenía un paquete de bonos que eran préstamos de deuda, de gente
que no iban a poder pagar esa deuda y se las estaban pasando de unos a otros
hasta que llegó el momento en que se acabó la música. En España se esta
sufriendo mas la crisis porque nada más producía una cosa, en el Reino Unido
también había una burbuja inmobiliaria pero el petróleo en Escocía todavía lo
tienen y es el centro financiero mundial y tiene otros sectores en los cuales son
competitivos.
142
Pregunta - ¿Cuál es la correlación entre la crisis económica y crisis política?
Respuesta - Yo creo que la crisis política e institucional española tiene su base en
la transición española que se hizo en España, no hubo una transición en base a
una ruptura, lo que hubo fue una claudicación de las fuerzas políticas que al final
pensaron que no era posible esa ruptura democrática y entonces pues adaptaron
las instituciones franquistas a una nueva situación política, que es
institucionalmente el rey es el sucesor de Franco y las Cortes españolas son una
evolución de las cortes franquistas, vale que ahora están formadas... donde se
pueden escoger a los diputados aunque la forma de escoger a los diputados no
sea muy democrática en comparación con otros países. La calidad democrática
que en España es baja pero no está ligado a la crisis económica, esto está ligado
al propio origen de las estructuras políticas en España y de las instituciones que en
España vienen del franquismo que son una evolución de las instituciones
franquistas, hay un pecado original de ellas y entonces lo que hace la crisis
económica es que la gente se dé cuenta de estas cosas.
Pregunta - ¿Que usted ve que la deuda que tiene España no es sostenible y que no se
debería pagar?
Respuesta - Bueno, pues, yo que sé, de esto estaba hablando con un abogado
muy famoso José Antón Pérez Rema, quien dice que la deuda española una parte
es clarísimamente ilegítima. El derecho internacional dice que la deuda ilegitima va
en contra de los intereses de la ciudadanía pues esa deuda no hay que pagarla, si
en particular ese tramo de deuda que Rajoy ha dedicado a la banca, que la van a
tener que pagar todos los españoles, a fin de cuentas es transformar deuda
pública, la deuda privada en deuda pública.
Pregunta - ¿Es viable una salida del euro?
Respuesta - Bueno algunos economistas están debatiendo que a lo mejor la salida
más fácil era tener dos euros diferentes, un euro del norte y uno del sur, así los
países del sur que son los mas afectados podrían devaluar la moneda. Cuando se
hizo el tratado de Maastricht ya decían que iba a pasar estas cosas pasarían que
una sola moneda con tantos países tan diferentes económicamente iba ser
criminal. España tiene gente que realmente lo están pasada mal en estos tiempo
de crisis y la única baza que tiene España es pegar un puñetazo en la mesa y
amenazar con la salida de Europa así seguro que empezarían a hablar de una
solución, porque EU no permitiría la salida de España porque no les interesa.
143
Pregunta - ¿Sobre las políticas de austeridad impuestas por Europa, son medidas
acertadas o por el contrario atentan contra el estado de bienestar español?
Respuesta - Eso son medidas son medidas injustas, si tu si ves un profesor que le
han bajado el sueldo por los recortes y mañana no es que ya te bajen el sueldo es
que te despiden, con es paso del tiempo destrozara el estado de bienestar español.
Además van a cerrar mas empresas, lo que consiguen es que la gente tenga
menos dinero y puedan gastar menos, los empresarios también van a ganar
menos, van a despedir a más gente y va a ser un efecto negativo. Estas medidas
de austeridad sirven a Alemania para asegurarse que sus bancos financieros
cobran.
Pregunta - ¿Cuáles serían los pasos efectivos para seguir para una reforma de ley
electoral, porque también tenemos una crisis política?
Respuesta - Tendrían que llegar a un consenso en el Congreso de los diputados y
aprobar una nueva ley, pero no creo que vaya pasar, porque si no ha pasado hasta
ahora… no creo que ninguna sea perfecta pero por ejemplo en Escocia si te llevas
el 51% de los votos te llevas el 51% de los escaños, si quieres sacar mayoría
absoluta, en cambio en España con el 28% de los votos se puede gobernar con
mayoría absoluta, lo que me parece injusto para la ciudadanía.
Pregunta - ¿Una ley de transparencia sería un solución para luchar contra la corrupción
política y económica?
Respuesta - Pues la corrupción ha sido generalizada durante toda la historia en
España no sólo en la historia de la democracia sino antes también España siempre
ha sido una clase política corrupta. Una ley de transparencia debería permitir que el
ciudadano supiera que se hace con cada céntimo del dinero que paga en
impuestos, eso no creo que vaya pasar en España. Va a seguir habiendo
corrupción y va a seguir habiendo de todo porque los políticos no les interesa
terminar con la corrupción
Pregunta - ¿Cuál sería el sistema impositivo ideal para una futura reforma fiscal en
España?
Respuesta - ¡Mira! yo cuando estudiaba empresariales en Santiago de
Compostela me enseñaron que un sistema fiscal tiene que ser progresivo, tienen
que pagar más los que más tienen, pero en España el sistema fiscal es regresivo,
los que más tienen son los que menos pagan, las empresas del IBEX 35 están
pagando entre el 1 y el 8% del impuesto y el resto va al extranjero. En la crisis del
144
29, una de las cosas que ayudó a salir a los Estados Unidos de la crisis fue que los
ricos y las grandes empresas pagaban mas de un 60% de sus ganancias en
impuestos.
Pregunta - ¿Subir los salarios mínimos? España tiene casi los salarios interprofesionales
más bajos de Europa (728 €) Y las pensiones también, ¿Sería sostenible poder subirlas
con la inestabilidad que tenemos?
Respuesta – Sí los ricos pagaran mas impuestos habría dinero en España para
sostener el sistema de pensiones español, entonces sí se acabará con el fraude
fiscal y los ricos empezarán a pagar el impuesto pues habría dinero para subir los
salarios.
Pregunta - El Banco Central Europeo, Alemania, el Fondo Monetario Internacional, nos
dice que los salarios son demasiado altos en España porque no es un país productivo
¿Como de podría plantear la productividad de un país sin tener que bajar los salarios?
Otros métodos tiene que haber…
Respuesta - En España cuando dicen que no eres productivo ¡joder! pues
entonces vamos a tener que empezar a trabajar como los de Bangladesh. Lo que
quieren hacer es un mercado de mano de obra barata porque la productividad, la
competitividad se consigue no sólo bajando salarios se consigue mejorando el
producto, si tienes unos productos y unos son más caros que otros pues puedes
cobrar el tuyo más caro que el del lado porque el tuyo es mejor, pero en España
no, en España tienes que ponerlo más barato y la forma de ponerlo más barato es
bajar los salarios. Bueno pues en España las tiendas abren a las 10 de la mañana
o a las 11 hasta la 13:30 que cierran para irse a comer y después vuelven a abrir a
las 16:30 o a las 17 hasta las 20. En otros países no, abren a las nueve y cierran a
las cinco o siete, eso hace que sean mas productivos, además las empresas
extranjeras invierten mas dinero y tiempo en preparar a sus empleados, y eso hace
que los empleados sean mas productivos
Pregunta - Como podemos ser más competitivos se quejan de que no somos un país
competitivo ¿qué deberíamos mejorar? ¿Qué pilares son básicos para mejorar nuestra
competitividad?
Respuesta - En España se entiende competitividad cómo vender más barato que
el de al lado a base de recortar salarios, no se entiende que un producto pueda
competir en base a su calidad para que mejore la calidad necesitas investigación y
desarrollo, pues España eso… en eso no se invierte, en España se bajan los
145
salarios sistemáticamente. Finlandia, ¿qué es lo que tiene? ¿Porque Finlandia es
un país relativamente exitoso internacional económicamente y España no? ¿qué
tienen ellos? ellos lo que tienen es que dedican mucho dinero a la educación de
sus ciudadanos, y su gobierno invierte mas en I+D cosa que no hace España.
Pregunta - Adam Smith decía que el capital humano es esencial para crear la riqueza de
una nación, en España hay 28.4% de abandono escolar en lo que es la ESO, casi el más
alto de Europa. ¿Cómo cree usted que podemos mejorar esta situación ¿La nueva ley
impuesta por el PP puede mejorarla? ¿O cree usted que no va a mejorar estas
estadísticas tan negativas?
Repuesta - Yo te puedo hablar de las universidades españolas de los años 90 que
yo hice…,en las Universidades españolas ibas a la clase si querías ir, a la clase
que era estilo anfiteatro y éramos pues 200, 300 podemos ser allí metidos en el
aula, se deberían minimizar los grupos como en Inglaterra en seminarios de 12
personas para así obtener un trato personalizado. En España no hay trato personal
por parte del profesor y después no hay interés de hacer a la gente que salga con
una crítica y una buena educación. Con la nueva subida de las tasas universitarias
y la reducción de becas van a estudiar los ricos solo.
Pregunta - La cuestionable eficiencia de la actual reforma laboral impuesta por el actual
gobierno, España tenia cinco millones de parados antes de la introducción de la reforma
labora y actualmente supera los seis millones, ¿Está siendo un fracaso?, ¿Cómo se podría
mejorar esa reforma laboral para que creara empleo?
Repuesta - No, bueno, la reforma laboral, esto es lo que siempre ha querido hacer
la derecha española, lo que pasa es nunca han tenido la oportunidad de hacerlo
ahora como hay una crisis pues tiene la oportunidad de hacerlo, pero vamos, esto
lo que quieren es cambiar la estructura, que la gente trabaje más por menos dinero
y con menos derechos, esto es lo que siempre ha querido la derecha en España,
pero esto ya se sabía que esto no iba a crear empleo. Si se le facilita el despido a
las empresas y, abaratas el empleo pues lo que vas a conseguir, pues tampoco
hace falta ser Einstein para darte cuenta que si lo pones más barato pues van a
despedir a más gente, es que 2 + 2 son cuatro, eso lo sabía todo el mundo. Lo que
pasa, en teoría que no contratan porque el despido luego es muy caro y no quieren
hacer a la gente fija, por una parte si tiene un poquito de teoría buena, pero esta
teoría no pasa en España porque los empresarios españoles no son tan de mirar
por sus empleados.
146
Pregunta - En teoría las empresas privadas resultan ser mas eficientes y efectivas dado el
entorno donde se desarrollan que las empresas publicas. ¿Cuál seria el sentido de
nacionalizar los sectores estratégicos?
Respuesta - Como principio ideológico yo pienso que los recursos naturales de un
país pertenecen a los habitantes de ese país entonces los recursos naturales, los
ríos no tienen dueño pertenecen a todos los españoles, las empresas privadas
hacen negocio de esos recursos y te lo cobran encima a precios mas caros, los
recursos naturales de una nación tienen que estar en las manos del gobierno de
esa nación, los recursos que son de todos los ciudadanos, un bien público no
puede servir para ganancia económica personal de unos pocos.
Pregunta - ¿La banca también? ¿debería tener una banca pública?
Respuesta - Debería haber una banca pública además de bancas privadas , pero
tiene que haber un banco público se dedique a dar crédito y crear las condiciones
para que en España pueda haber inversión en industria, las pymes no tienen
acceso a créditos con una banca pública que no está motivada únicamente por el
criterio del beneficio económico, una banca publica debería está motivada con la
construcción del país, con el desarrollo económico del país desde el beneficio
empresarial pues una banca así ayudaría a la recuperación económica.
¡Muchísimas gracias de verdad!
Espero que te haya servido de ayuda
147
Entrevista 6: Grupo Focal
Pregunta - ¿Cuáles son los detonantes de la crisis económica española?
Respuestas:
- En España factores de crecimiento en o los sectores claves han sido siempre el
turismo y la Construcción, y en la construcción se formo una burbuja insostenible
que lógicamente tenía que explotar y el Turismo está muy afectado por otros
sectores y además se mueve por ciclos, de manera que en cuanto explotó una
crisis internacional, estaba lógico que un país como España con esos dos motores
de crecimiento económico era uno de los países que más iba a sufrir dicha crisis y
con ello arrastra al resto de sectores.
- Empieza todo por algo que comienza en EEUU, con las hipotecas NINJA, y que en
un mundo tan globalizado como en el que nos encontramos que todo el mundo
adquiere deuda de otras partes, lógicamente nos ha afectado a todos.
- Si encima sumamos que el motor económico que es actualmente un país como
EEUU tiene una crisis económica importante, lógicamente en España esas
consecuencias se iban a multiplicar y han dado lugar a la situación en la que hoy
estamos inmersos.
- A esto hay que sumar la corrupción existente en nuestro país, que una gran
mayoría de los dirigentes busca su interés personal en lugar del interés social y eso
lleva a un nulo sentido de la responsabilidad, lo mismos pasa en los bancos.
Pregunta - ¿Cuál es la correlación entre la crisis económica y crisis política e institucional
española?
Respuestas:
- Yo pienso que ahora nos fijamos más en la crisis política por la mala situación que
tenemos en el ámbito económico. Es decir, antes había la misma cantidad de
chorizos, sino más pero como las cosas iban bien y la población vivía en su
inmensa mayoría años de bonanza nos daba igual dichos robos y dicha corrupción,
ya que efectivamente vivíamos por encima de nuestras posibilidades.
- Los bancos han consentido esos préstamos injustificados, y el gasto de dinero que
no se tiene, especulando sobre lo que se iba a ganar en 40 años, de manera que
ahora mismo no hay dinero y el que tiene se lo guarda por la situación de temor
generalizado en nuestra sociedad.
148
Pregunta - ¿Es legítima y sostenible la deuda española respecto a sus acreedores, o bien
se debería renegociar o dejar transitoriamente de pagar?
Respuestas:
- Se deberían negociar dicha deuda, al menos los intereses que pagamos por la
misma… Eso es un poco el sistema del capitalismo, si en Europa quieren que
funcione ciertos países en la parte de arriba, tienen que mandar a otros países
abajo, de manera que es el papel que nos ha tocado dentro de esta unión.
- Alemania esta tan interesada en cobrar esa deuda, porque ellos son los principales
acreedores y está en su máxima riqueza de los préstamos que han ofrecido y los
intereses que generan.
- Otra causa de la crisis es que tengamos una misma moneda pero no una política
única, sino con políticas muy distintas.
Pregunta - ¿Es viable la salida de España del euro?
Respuesta:
- Sería un batacazo social y un desorden para la ciudadanía nuevamente. Creo que
la principal causa es que en nuestro país no se fabrica nada, es todo productos
importados y en realidad la industria es una de las principales fuentes de riqueza
en un país. Además los sectores fuertes que tenemos como el turismo no están
siendo aprovechados de una manera responsable y eficiente. Además la
mentalidad generalizada en España es de desorden, y de invertir fuera en lugar de
invertir en nosotros y fomentar nuestros sectores.
Pregunta - ¿Y un doble euro?
Respuesta:
- Podríamos hacer un euro con un precio, o un euro que nosotros podamos
desvaluar la moneda, y sacar más dinero. Pero socialmente ya se impondría más
la idea de la Europa Rica y la Europa Pobre, que es lo que esta sucediendo pero
no está escrito. Es cierto que con la peseta llamábamos más la atención de turista
y era un reclamo para los países del alrededor, ahora todo esos visitantes se van a
países que le ofrecen monedas más devaluadas que la suya (Turquía...). Tenemos
una moneda de país rico, pero en un país pobre, aunque cuando entramos en la
“Zona Euro” cumplíamos varios requisitos muy difíciles de cumplir (inflación,
deuda…), pero como el país fue en buen momento pudimos entrar, ahora mismo
no tenemos nada.
149
Pregunta - ¿Sobre las políticas de austeridad impuestas por Europa, son medidas
acertadas o por el contrario atentan contra el estado bienestar español?
Respuestas:
- Intentamos seguir el ejemplo del estado financiero Estadounidense, consumir y
consumir. En cambio lo que hacen en España es recortar aún más los sueldos y
las pensiones, es decir una política de austeridad lo que producen es que las
pymes que es el motor principal en nuestro país, cierran que al final es lo que
genera movimiento, beneficios y puestos de trabajo.
- Estas políticas se hacen para contentar a los acreedores Europeos como
Alemania, ellos tienen grandes empresas y los recortes no afectarían igual que
como está sucediendo en nuestro país. Deberíamos cambiar la política fiscal, con
tanto impuesto para los trabajadores independientes o pequeñas empresas que
son al fin y al cabo lo más perjudicados con estas medidas que se están tomando.
Pregunta - ¿Cuáles serian los pasos efectivos a seguir para una reforma de la ley
electoral? ¿Cuál sería el sistema electoral ‘perfecto’ o posible frente al bipartidismo actual?
Respuestas:
- En nuestro país existe el bipartidismo, y unos pierden a favor de los otros. En
España con sólo un 22% de los votos obtenemos mayoría absoluta. El problema
que ellos no cambian estas leyes porque se van turnando las candidaturas, de
manera que les perjudicaría a ellos mismos.
- También es cierto que si la ciudadanía no lucha , se manifiesta y reivindica no
conseguiremos nunca cambiar las cosas, y luchar y que se reconozcan los
derechos de la población.
Pregunta - ¿Qué medidas se debería incluir en una ley de transparencia que luche contra
la corrupción política y económica?
Respuestas:
- Están haciendo una cortina de humo, puesto que ellos son los que determinan lo
que se publica, lo que es transparente o lo que no. Para que fuera correcto lo
lógico sería que hubiese una auditoría externa y no internas como se producen
escondiendo los partidos la parte que quieren.
- Otro problema es que en la práctica el poder judicial no está separado del poder
legislativo, de manera que todos estos políticos que no cumplen con su cargo y que
se dedican a pasar su legislatura intentando enriquecerse, no sufren un proceso
judicial como cualquier otro individuo, ya que hay muchos intereses detrás y las
150
fuerzas se unen para conseguir librar a estos políticos que encubren las
irregularidades que se suceden con fondos públicos.
Pregunta - ¿Cuál sería el sistema impositivo ideal de una futura reforma fiscal en España?
Respuestas:
- El problema que en España no se cumple, supuestamente es un proceso
impositivo progresivo, ya que las grandes empresas tienen las herramientas para
poder eludir esas cargas fiscales, como los paraísos fiscales que tienen las
grandes empresas del IBEX 35, en cambio las pequeñas que pueden hacer…
¿Guardar el dinero debajo del colchón?
- La gente que tiene el poder para cambiar ese sistema tiene intereses personales,
de manera que no le interesa controlar esa evasión fiscal, y sigue perdiendo la
ciudadanía y las pequeñas empresas que son las que no tienen tantos medios a su
disposición para combatir ese alto sistema impositivo.
Pregunta - ¿Resultaría viable subir el salario mínimo interprofesional y las pensiones ante
la situación de inestabilidad económica actual?
Respuestas:
- Ya sabemos que en este país no nos vamos a poder cobrar jubilación…
- No sería viable poder subir las pensiones, ya que con el nivel de paro tan alto que
hay no da para cubrir esas pensiones.
- Sería interesante también subir los salarios, y reducir el número de diputados y
políticos por habitantes, que son completamente innecesarios y aumentar el
número de inspectores de hacienda para evitar tanta evasión y fomentar un
sentimiento de responsabilidad para evitar este fraude tan generalizado que existe
actualmente.
Pregunta - El salario mínimo interprofesional ha decrecido en los últimos años con la
excusa de no ser lo suficientemente productivo con respecto a Europa. ¿Cómo España
podría ser más productiva sin el perjuicio de rebajar los salarios de los trabajadores
españoles?
Respuestas:
- No sé de dónde sacan que somos una ciudadanía improductiva. Yo no he visto a
ningún inglés trabajar con la misma eficiencia que un español. Es una excusa para
justificar la reducción de salarios, como podría haber valido cualquier otra excusa.
- En economía la productividad es el producto que sacas por unidad de tiempo. La
única manera de mejorar y fomentar la productividad es a través de la motivación
151
de los empleados, inversión en investigación y mejora de medios. La formación que
se ejerce en el extranjero a los empleados es fundamental, en las empresas
españolas no se prioriza al personal ni en su inversión para la mejora de su
productividad, y por lo tanto de su beneficio final.
Pregunta - El capital humano es esencial para crear riqueza en una nación, por lo que
unos de los pilares a mantener y desarrollar es el sistema educativo público. ¿Cuál sería el
marco ideal de la reforma de un sistema educativo deficitario debido al alto fracaso
estudiantil en enseñanzas medias y la inefectividad de las universidades españolas que no
propician la adecuada inserción al mercado laboral?
Respuestas:
- Falta mucha conciencia en España cultural, no se educa a los jóvenes a que
estudien y a que tengan un nivel alto, porque a nuestros políticos y a nuestro
sistema les interesa eso.
- Los niños están en el colegio todo el día metidos por los horarios profesionales de
los padres, de manera que se “les aparca” durante toda la jornada y cuando llegan
a casa no les apetece hacer nada y solamente pasar tiempo con su familia y
buscan la atención de sus padres.
- Además la media de corte para acceder a ser maestro en nuestro país es de las
más bajas que existen (6,5) de manera que no se valora y ni se buscan los mejores
profesionales para un elemento tan importante en una sociedad como son los
maestros y los profesores. Además la carrera ya no busca una especialización de
los profesionales, por los recortes que se están produciendo, todos los maestros
tienen que cubrir cualquier asignatura o cualquier materia, frente a una baja de
menos de 20 días.
- La universidad española además enseña los principios básicos para dominar una
materia, pero no te ayuda a pensar ni a ser un profesional crítico y formado, de
manera que todos los estudiantes salen con grandes conocimientos adquiridos y
poca parte práctica y poco resolutivos a la hora de afrontar un puesto profesional y
las complicaciones que pueden surgir en el mismo.
Pregunta - Debido a la ‘cuestionable’ eficiencia de la actual reforma laboral. ¿Qué otras
medidas viables y sostenibles podrían tener cabida para una reducción del desempleo a
corto y a medio plazo?
Respuestas:
- Sobre todo los autónomos de que hemos hablado algo, fomenta que la gente sea
emprendedora.
152
- Por lo menos que haya una política coherente… El despido es necesario para
muchas empresas, pero claro con un poco de apoyo a esas personas que son
despedidas y a las empresas que tienen que despedir a algún empleado para
mantener la solvencia y la existencia de esas pequeñas empresas.
- Esta reforma no ha solucionado nada, porque además tan poco ha mejorado el
empleo, no lo ha fomentado, ha ido a peor, ha sido como una solución para
mejorar, sanear y “maquillar” las cuentas y presupuestos y reducir la deuda, pero
eso en realidad a largo plazo no nos lleva a nada, solo a agravar una crisis
económica que además ya se ha convertido en una crisis social.
Pregunta - Más del 99% de las empresas españolas son pymes, las cuales son el motor
para mantener y generar trabajo. La banca privada utiliza la mayoría de los activos dados
por Comunidad Europea para su propio saneamiento dejando a las empresas desprovistas
del crédito necesario para su desarrollo. ¿Se debería exigir a la banca más solidaridad con
las pymes o se debería crear una banca pública que vele por este propósito?
Respuestas:
- Sí, debería haber una banca que facilitara créditos a pequeñas y medianas
empresas para ayudar a que sigan adelante, y que sigan siendo el motor de la
economía española y fomentar el empleo. En lugar de eso, se estas fomentando el
despido libre pero con muchas trabas aun para esos pequeños negocio, sino lo que
fomentamos es el fraude y no fomentas el empleo. Se están tratando de sanear
cuentas, pero como contrapartida el capital social va a empeorar.