1
AMBULANCE PERSONNEL PARTICIPATING IN CODESIGN OF A NEW CONCEPT FOR DETECTION OF TRAUMATIC INJURIES IN EMERGENCY CARE Siw Eriksson 12 , Jiaqi Yao 2 , Phu Lieng 2 , Leif Sandsjö 13 , Pontus Wallgren 2 , MariAnne Karlsson 2 1 University of Borås, Borås, Sweden 2 Design & Human Factors/Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden 3 MedTech West, Gothenburg, Sweden Ideation The main purpose of the ideation stage workshop was to create ideas in relation to the intended use of the new concept. A second purpose was to get the participants familiar to each other, the environment, and the overall situation in order to facilitate collaboration. Refreshments were served to keep everybody going! Results Results from followup interviews tell that the company representatives got more detailed knowledge about the ambulance personnel’s needs earlier in the process compared to previous projects. “We got answers to (crucial) questions we never had thought about”. This knowledge may contribute to a better product with higher usability. The ambulance personnel were positive and pleased to contribute their knowledge. One response was “it is very interesting to contribute to the development of a future product”. The CoDesign Process* Introduction Studies in product development argue the importance of user involvement when designing products. Benefits include targeting relevant problems, finding usable and innovative solutions, and eliciting user needs and expectations that may prove critical when introducing the new product. However, some difficulties have been identified. These are mainly related to differences between the users and developers in terms of skills, experiences, terminology, goals and perspectives and that the users tend to neglect the value of their input. Typically, users are also included too late in the process to have any real opportunity to contribute to the design of the final product. The aim of this study was to explore how early inclusion of user competence might influence the development of a novel concept for detection of traumatic injuries in emergency care. The Approach The main approach of the study was to include all relevant stakeholders in a codesign process. Ambulance nurses representing car and helicopter ambulance were invited to three consecutive workshops together with development personnel from the company behind the new concept, and design researchers and engineers. All participants were enabled to not only express their views on suggested solutions, but were also encouraged to take an active part in the design process and propose solutions based on their own experience. The workshops were held in the ideation, concept generation, and concept development stages of the project. Each workshop was prepared by the researchers to enable and stimulate interaction within the group by applying design practices and provide mockups and illustrations. The Application The new concept being the case in this study was a microwave –based device for early detection of pneumo/hemo thorax . Conclusion The codesign process facilitated the ambulance nurses to contribute their knowledge so that needs and requirements was understood and integrated by the engineers in the design of a new concept for early detection of pneumo/hemo –thorax in emergency care. Concept Generation This 3 hour workshop focused on handson activities based on sketches and mockups prepared from ideas of the previous workshop, thereby confirming the input provided by the participants. A “material table” was arranged to allow the group to try out alternative solutions to the ones that was prepared in advance. Concept Development The general idea with the 3 rd workshop was to focus on the most promising concept and take this further using more detailed sketches, models and mockups/prototypes. This provided the participants a chance to get a “touch and feel” experience of the concept and how it may work in a real life situation. (*) The codesign process and illustrations are taken from “Conceptual design of a body interface for detection of traumatic internal injuries” a Master of Science Thesis in Industrial Design Engineering presented by Phu Lieng and Jiaqi Yao at the Department of Design & Human Factors at Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 2015.

AMBULANCE PERSONNEL PARTICIPATING IN CO DESIGNhb.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:922021/FULLTEXT01.pdf · The co‐design process facilitated the ambulance nurses to contribute their

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: AMBULANCE PERSONNEL PARTICIPATING IN CO DESIGNhb.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:922021/FULLTEXT01.pdf · The co‐design process facilitated the ambulance nurses to contribute their

AMBULANCE PERSONNEL PARTICIPATING IN CO‐DESIGN OF A NEW CONCEPT FOR 

DETECTION OF TRAUMATIC INJURIES IN EMERGENCY CARESiw Eriksson 1‐2, Jiaqi Yao 2, Phu Lieng 2, Leif Sandsjö 1‐3, Pontus Wallgren 2, MariAnne Karlsson 2

1 University of Borås, Borås, Sweden  2 Design & Human Factors/Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden3 MedTech West, Gothenburg, Sweden

Ideation The main purpose of the ideation stage workshopwas to create ideas in relation to the intended useof the new concept. A second purpose was to getthe participants familiar to each other, theenvironment, and the overall situation in order tofacilitate collaboration. Refreshments were servedto keep everybody going!

ResultsResults from follow‐up interviews tell that the company representatives got more detailed knowledge about the ambulance personnel’s needsearlier in the process compared to previous projects. “We got answers to (crucial) questions we never had thought about”. This knowledgemay contribute to a better product with higher usability. The ambulance personnel were positive and pleased to contribute their knowledge.One response was “it is very interesting to contribute to the development of a future product”.

The Co‐Design Process*

IntroductionStudies in product development argue the importance of userinvolvement when designing products. Benefits include targetingrelevant problems, finding usable and innovative solutions, andeliciting user needs and expectations that may prove critical whenintroducing the new product.However, some difficulties have been identified. These are mainlyrelated to differences between the users and developers in terms ofskills, experiences, terminology, goals and perspectives and that theusers tend to neglect the value of their input.Typically, users are also included too late in the process to have anyreal opportunity to contribute to the design of the final product.

The aim of this study was to explore how early inclusion of usercompetence might influence the development of a novel conceptfor detection of traumatic injuries in emergency care.

The ApproachThe main approach of the study was to include all relevantstakeholders in a co‐design process. Ambulance nurses representingcar and helicopter ambulance were invited to three consecutiveworkshops together with development personnel from the companybehind the new concept, and design researchers and engineers. Allparticipants were enabled to not only express their views onsuggested solutions, but were also encouraged to take an active partin the design process and propose solutions based on their ownexperience. The workshops were held in the ideation, conceptgeneration, and concept development stages of the project. Eachworkshop was prepared by the researchers to enable and stimulateinteraction within the group by applying design practices and providemock‐ups and illustrations.

The ApplicationThe new concept being the case in this study was a microwave –baseddevice for early detection of pneumo/hemo ‐thorax .

ConclusionThe co‐design process facilitated the ambulance nurses to contribute their knowledge so that needs and requirements was understood andintegrated by the engineers in the design of a new concept for early detection of pneumo/hemo –thorax in emergency care.

Concept GenerationThis 3 hour workshop focused on hands‐onactivities based on sketches and mock‐upsprepared from ideas of the previous workshop,thereby confirming the input provided by theparticipants. A “material table” was arranged toallow the group to try out alternative solutions tothe ones that was prepared in advance.

Concept DevelopmentThe general idea with the 3rd workshop was tofocus on the most promising concept and take thisfurther using more detailed sketches, models andmock‐ups/prototypes.This provided the participants a chance to get a“touch and feel” experience of the concept andhow it may work in a real life situation.

(*) The co‐design process and illustrations are taken from “Conceptual design of a body interface for detection of traumatic internal injuries” ‐ a Master of Science Thesis in Industrial DesignEngineering presented by Phu Lieng and Jiaqi Yao at the Department of Design & Human Factors at Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 2015.