Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
All India Coordinated Research Project on Weed Management (AICRP-WM)
ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur (MP)
Technical Programme 2020-21& 2021-22
WP1. Development of location specific sustainable weed management practices
WP1.1 Weed management in major crops and cropping systems of the state
WP1.1.1 Weed management in rice, and rice-based cropping systems
Observations (Following observations to be taken in each experiment under WP 1.1)
1. Weed emergence - population (species-wise) and dry matter accumulation (category-wise –
sedge, grasses, BLW, total) at 30, 60 DAS/T and harvest and base year observations.
2. Crop growth parameters [plant height, dry matter production (species wise and total) and no. of effective tillers) ] at 60DAS/DAT, and at harvest and yield (grain and straw) at harvest
3. Continuous monitoring of shift in weed species as compared to base year
4. Weed seed bank studies soil depth wise 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm depths soil samples just after summer and before kharif season. Minimum of 3 kg soils need to be collected and seed bank
study will be conducted in trays.
5. Energetic and economics of tillage and weed management practices
6. Effect on physico-chemical and biological properties of soil– initial and after end of each cycle.
7. Phytotoxicity on crops, if any
8. Nutrient status before and after the cropping cycle 9. Visual observation may be recorded for residual toxicity if any of previous crops herbicides and
can be compared to unweeded control
10. Effect soil physio – chemical and biological properties 11. Economics of the treatments
Coimbatore
WP 1.1.1.1 Long-term herbicide trial in transplanted lowland rice-rice cropping system
OLD
Objectives
To study the influence of weed management on weed shift, productivity and economics in transplanted rice-rice cropping system
To assess the persistent and residue (soil, grain and straw) of herbicides
To study the effect of weed management on rhizosphere microbial community
Treatments:
Treatment Dose (g/ha) DAT
T1: PE pyrasosulfuron-ethyl fb hand weeding (K & R) 20 3 fb 30
T2: PE pyrasosulfuron-ethyl fb hand weeding (K) + PE bensulfuron-
methyl + pretilachlor fb hand weeding (R) 20 +660
3 fb 30
(K and R)
2
T3: PE pyrasosulfuron-ethyl (10% WP) fb penoxsulam+ cyhalofop butyl
(RM) (K & R) 20 fb 135 3 fb 25
T4: PE pyrasosulfuron-ethyl (10% WP) fb POE bispyribac-sodium (10%
EC) (K) + PE bensulfuron-methyl + fb POE bispyribac-sodium (R)
20 fb 25 +
660 fb 25
3 fb 30
(K and R)
T5: Hand weeding twice - 15 and 30
T6 : Unweeded check - -
K –Kharif; R -rabi, DAT: Days After Transplanting Design: RBD; Replications: Non-replicated
Crops : Rice
Seasons : K –Kharif ; R -Rabi
Design : RBD
Replication : Non replicated
Plot size : 12 m X 9 m
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Jorhat
WP 1.1.1.2 Long-term herbicidal trial in rice-rice cropping sequence
OLD
(Year of commencement Kharif 2016)
Objectives
Treatments
S No Treatments
1. Farmers practice (pretilachlor 0.750 kg/ha + NPK fertilizer)
2. Farmers practice (pretilachlor 0.750 kg/ha + 75% nutrient through fertilizers + 25% nutrient
through organic source)
3. Pyrazosulfuron 25 g/ha fb bispyribac-Na 25 g/ha (100% nutrient through fertilizers)
4. Pyrazosulfuron 25 g/ha fb bispyribac-Na 25 g/ha (75% nutrient through fertilizers + 25%
nutrient through organic source)
5. Pyrazosulfuron 25 g/ha rotated with pretilachlor 0.750 kg/ha fb bispyribac-Na 25 g/ha (100%
nutrient through fertilizers)
6. Pyrazosulfuron 25 g/ha rotated with pretilachlor 0.750 kg/ha fb bispyribac-Na 25 g/ha (75%
nutrient through fertilizers + 25% nutrient through organic source)
Plot Size: - 10m x 10m =100 m2
Design: RBD Replication: 3
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Jorhat
WP 1.1.1.3 Weed management in rice-pea-rice cropping sequence
NEW
Objective: To find out an alternative method of rice cultivation along with the minimization of yield loss
from weeds in rice-pea relay cropping system
Treatments:
First crop rice:
3
Rice variety: Any medium duration recommended variety
Design: Split-plot Replication: 3
Methods of crop establishment (M)
M1: Conventional transplanting
M2: Direct Seeding by drum seeder
M3: Reduced tillage up to 50% with direct-seeding
Weed management practices (W)
W1: Pretilachlor 0.750 kg/ha
W2: Pretilachlor 0.750 kg/ha PE + working with grubber/Paddy weeder at 30DAS/DAP
W3: Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl 25g/ha PE + bispyribac-sodium 0.025 kg/ha at 30 DAS/DAP
W4: Working with grubber/Paddy weeder at 20 and 40 DAS/DAP
Second and third crop pea & rice:
Variety: Any suitable recommended variety
Treatments: No weed management treatments. The residual effect of the first crop will be studied.
Design: Split plot Replication: 3 Plot size: 4m x 3m
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Anand
WP 1.1.1.4 Weed management in dry seeded DSR
Collaboration with AICRP on Rice, AAU, Anand
Objectives: 1. To evaluate the bio-efficacy of different herbicides to manage complex weed flora in drilled rice 2. To study the effect of different weed management practices on growth and yield of rice 3. To assess phytotoxicity of applied herbicides, if any on crop
Year of commencement: Kharif-2020
Treatment:
Note: - PE = Pre-Emergence (1-3 DAS) EPoE = Early Post-Emergence (10-15 DAS)
PoE = Post-Emergence (25-30 DAS)
Experimental details:
Sr.
No. Treatments
Dose
g/ha
Time of
application
T1 Pretilachlor + pyrazosulfuron-ethyl (premix) 600+15 PE
T2 Pretilachlor + pyrazosulfuron-ethyl fb HW at 30 DAS (premix) 600 fb15 PE
T3 Pretilachlor fb bispyribac-sodium 600 fb 25 PE fb PoE
T4 Bentazone 480 g/l SL + bispyribac-sodium (tank mix) 960+25 EPoE
T5 Bispyribac-sodium fb HW at 30 DAS 25 EPoE
T6 Metsulfuron-methyl + chlorimuron-ethyl (premix) 4 g/ha EPoE
T7 Triafamone + ethoxysulfuron (premix) 44.0+22.5 PoE
T8 Triafamone + ethoxysulfuron (premix) fb mechanical weeding at
30 DAS
44.0+22.5 EPoE
T9 Penoxsulam + cyhalofop-butyl (premix) 120 PoE
T10 Penoxsulam + cyhalofop-butyl (premix) fb HW at 30 DAS 120 EPoE
T11 Mechanical weeding at 20 and 40 DAS - -
T12 Weedy - -
4
1. Crop : Rice
2. Season : Kharif
3. Variety : Mahisagar
4. Seed rate : 60 kg/ha
5. Spacing : 30 cm between rows
6. Method of sowing : Drilling
7. Fertilizer : 50-25-0 NPK kg/ha
8. Design : RBD
9. Replications : Three
10. Plot Size : Gross: 3.60 x 5.0 m
: Net: 2.40 x 4.0 m
11. Water volume : 500 litres/ha
12. Spray equipment : Knapsack sprayer fitted with flat fan nozzle
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Karaikal (Volunteer centre)
WP 1.1.1.5 Weed management options for control of complex weed flora in dry direct- seeded rice
Objectives:
To study the weed management treatments against weed complex; and their effect on growth and yield of (unpuddled) dry direct-seeded rice
To study the phytotoxic effects on the crop, if any
Treatments:
Seed rate (3 levels) -Main plot
S1 – 56 kg/ha (75% of recommended seed rate)
S2 – 75 kg/ha (Recommended seed rate)
S3 – 94 kg/ha (25% higher recommended seed rate)
Weed management (4 levels)- Sub plot
W1 – Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha (PE)
W2 – Bispyribac-Na 25 g /ha (PoE)
W3 – Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha fb bispyribac-Na 25 g/ha
W4 – Unweeded control
* Medium duration variety will be used
Season: Aug 2020 – Jan 2021 Design: Split plot design Replications: 3
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Kashmir (Volunteer centre)
WP 1.1.1.6 Study of weed flora and their management through herbicides in rice grown under different establishment methods.
Objectives:
To study the effect of herbicides on weed dynamics under direct seeding and transplanted rice
To study the effect of herbicides on growth and productivity of rice grown under direct seeding and transplanted rice
Treatments:
5
Main plot treatments: Crop establishment method
i. Conventional transplanted rice (TPR) ii. Direct seeded rice (DSR)
Sub-plot treatment: Herbicides application
i. Butachlor 5% G (PE 1.5 kg/ha)
ii. Bispyribac-sodium (POE 25 g/ha)
iii. Penoxulam (Early POE 22.5 g/ha)
iv. Bensulfuron-methyl 0.6%+pretilachlor 6% GR (PE, 0.660 kg/ha)
v. Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 0.15%+pretilachlor 6% GR (PE, 0.615 kg/ha)
vi. Metsulfuron-methyl 10%+chlorimuron-ethyl 10% + 0.2% surfactant (POE, 4 g/ha)
vii. Weed free
viii. Weedy check
Design: Split-plot design
Replication: 3
Plot size: 3.00 m x 5.00 m
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Jammu
WP 1.1.1.7 (i) Effect of green manures and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of transplanted
rice-wheat cropping system
NEW
Objectives:
To study the effect of green manuring and pre and post-emergence herbicidal weed management on weed flora dynamics and productivity of rice.
Treatments:
Factor A In-situ green manuring (Main plot) Rice Nutrient levels (Main plot) Wheat
1. Cowpea 75% RDF
2. Dhaincha 100% RDF
3. Cluster bean 125% RDF
Factor B Herbicides (Sub-plot) Herbicides (Sub-plot)
1. Pretilachlor+pyrazosulfuron -ethyl 600+15
g/ha as PE
Sulfosulfuron + carfentrazone-ethyl
25+20 g/ha at 30-35 DAS
2. Bispyribac-sodium 25 g/ha at 25 days after
sowing
Clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron-
methyl 60+4 g/ha at 30-35 DAS
3. Triafamone + ethoxysulfuron 66.5 g/ha
(44+22.5 g/ha) as post-emergence
Clodinafop propargyl + metribuzin
54+120 g/ha at 30-35 DAS
4. Mechanical weeding at 20 & 40 DAT Mesoulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-
methyl sodium 14.4 g/ha at 30-35 DAS
*In-situ green manuring at 40-45 DAS, 100% RDF=100:50:25 NPK
Experiment details: Design: Spilt plot Design Plot size: 5 x 4 m Replications: 3
Observations (As given under WP 1.1.1, page 1)
WP 1.1.1.7 (ii) Effect of green manures and herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of direct seeded
rice-wheat cropping system
Objectives:
6
To study the effect of green manuring and pre and post emergence herbicidal weed management on weed flora dynamics and productivity of rice.
Treatments:
Factor A In-situ green manuring (Main plot) Rice Wheat establishment (Main plot)
1. Cowpea Conventional tillage
2. Dhaincha Zero tillage
3. Stale seed bed FIRB
Factor B Herbicides (Sub-plot) Herbicides (Sub-plot)
1. Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence Pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as PE
2. Bispyribac-sodium 25 g/ha at 25 days after
sowing
Flumioxazin 125 g/ha as PE
3 Triafamone + ethoxysulfuron 66.5 g/ha
(44+22.5 g/ha) as post-emergence
Pyroxasulfone 127.5 g/ha as PE
4.
Pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as pre-emergence fb
bispyribac-sodium 25 g/ha at 25 days after
sowing
Weed free
5.
Pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as pre-emergence fb
triafamone + ethoxysulfuron 66.5 g/ha
(44+22.5 g/ha) as post-emergence
Weedy check
*In-situ green manuring at 40-45 DAS
Experiment details: Design: Spilt plot Design Plot size: 5 x 3.2 m Replications: 3
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Banda (Volunteer centre)
WP1.1.1.8 Study on weed dynamics and weed management strategies in wheat under rice-wheat crop sequence of Buldelkhand region of U.P.
Objective:
To study the effect of weed management practices on weed dynamics
To study the effect of different weed management practices on crop growth, yield and economics
Treatment
Main plot treatment (Tillage practice)
T1-Conventional Tillage
T2-Zero Tillage
Sub Plot treatment
W1-Pendimethalin PE 1.0 kg/ha
W2-Pendimethalin 0.678 kg/ha + pyroxasulfone 127.5 g/ha
W3-Clodinafop propargyl +metsulfuron-methyl 60+ 4 g/ha as post-emergence. W4-Sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron (32 g/ha)
W5-Weedy check (control)
W6- Weed free
Design of experiment: Split plot Design Replication: 3 Plot size: 5m x 4m
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Kalyani
7
WP 1.1.1.9 Study on weed dynamics and weed management strategies in rice-wheat-green manure
cropping system under new alluvial soils
Objective:
To study the effect of weed management practices on weed dynamics
To study the effect of different weed management practices on crop growth, yield and economics
Treatment details
Treatments Kharif (Rice) Rabi (Wheat)
T1 Oxadiagryal PE 0.1 Kg/ha fb 2,4-D
POE 0.5 Kg/ha 25 DAT
Pendimethalin PE 1.0 Kg/ha fb metribuzin
POE 0.2Kg/ha 25 DAS
T2 Pretilachlor PE 0.70 Kg/ha Pendimethalin PE 1.0 Kg/ha
T3 Pretilachlor PE 0.70 Kg/ha fb
bispyribac-Na 25 g/ha 25 DAS
Pendimethalin 0.678 kg/ha + pyroxasulfone
127.5 g/ha
T4 Pretilachlor PE 0.70 Kg/ha fb
cyhalofop-butyl + penoxsulam 112.5 +
22.5 g/ha)
Pendimethalin PE 1.0 Kg/ha fb one hand
weeding at 30 DAS
T5 Oxadiagryal PE 0.1 Kg/ha fb passing
of conoweeder
Clodinafop-propargyl +metsulfuron-methyl
60+ 4 g/ha as post-emergence.
T6 Pretilachlor PE 0.70 Kg/ha fb passing
of conoweeder
Mesosulfuron+ iodosulfuron (RM) 13.4 g/ha
T7 Pretilachlor PE 0.70 Kg/ha fb
triafamone + ethoxysulfuron
(44.0+22.5)
Sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron (32 g/ha)
T8 2 hand weeding at 20 & 40 DAS 2 hand weeding at 20 & 40 DAS
T9 Weedy check (control) Weedy check (control)
Design of experiment: RCBD Replication: 4 Plot size: 5m x 4m
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Raipur
NEW
WP 1.1.1.10 Weed management in transplanted rice-chickpea cropping system
Objectives:
1. To study the effect of pre and post emergence herbicidal weed management on weed flora in rice-
chickpea
2. To evaluate different weed management practices for their effectiveness in rice and chickpea
3. To study the economics of the treatments.
Treatments Rice: transplanted condition Design RBD, Replications: Three
T1 Oxadiargyl 80g/ha PE fb PoE of bispyribac-Na at 20-25 DAT
T2 Oxadiargyl 80g/ha PE fb PoE penoxsulam + cyhalofop butyl 135 g/ha PoE as ready-mix at 20-25
DAT
T3 Oxadiargyl 80 g/ha PE fb PoE triafamone + ethoxysulfuron 66.5 g/ha as ready-mix at 20-25
DAT
T4 PoE penoxsulam + cyhalofop butyl 135 g/ha PoE as ready-mix at 20 DAT
T5 PoE triafamone + ethoxysulfuron 10% 66.5 g/ha as ready-mix at 20 DAT
T6 EPoE of Pretilachlor+bensulfuron 660 g/ha 10-12 DAT fb penoxsulam + cyhalofop 135 g/ha
PoE as ready-mix at 25-30 DAS
T7 EPoE Pretilachlor+bensulfuron 660 g/ha 10-12 DAT fb triafamone + ethoxysulfuron 66.5 g/ha as
ready-mix at 25-30 DAT
T8 Pyrazosulfuron 20 g/ha PE fb penoxsulam + cyhalofop 135 g/ha as ready-mix at 25-30 DAT
8
T9 Motorized weeder twice (single/double row type) 20 DAT fb Intra-row hand weeding at 40 DAT
T10 Mechanical weeding through Ambika paddy weeder at 20 and 40 DAS
T11 Two hand weeding (20 & 40 DAT)/Single hand weeding at 30 DAT
T
12
Weedy Check
*weedy check treatment seems to be needed to observe the weed flora of field as almost all the weeds of
the experimental area will occur in the weedy check plot
Chickpea, Design RBD, Replications: 03
Treatments details
T1 Pendimethalin 678 g/ha as PE
T2 Pendimethalin + imazethapyr 1000g/ha as PE
T3 Oxyfluorfen 140 g/ha as PE
T4 Topramezone 25.28 g/ha as POST (18-20 DAS)
T5 Pendimethalin 678 g/ha PE fb quizalofop 50 g/ha POST
T6 Pendimethalin 678 g/ha PE fb propaquizofop 50 g/ha POST
T7 Flauzifop – p- butyl+fomesafen 125 g/ha POST
T8 Flauzifop – p- butyl+fomesafen 250 g/ha POST
T9 Propaquizafop + imazethapyr 125 g/ha POST
T10 Mechanical weeding at 20 fb 40 DAS
T11 Hand Weeding at 30 DAS/Farmers practice
T 12 Weedy Check* please see the remark below
*weedy check treatment may be required to observe the weed flora of field as almost all the weeds of the
area will occur in the weedy check plot
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Raipur
NEW
WP 1.1.1.11 Weed flora and dynamics study in long-term fertilizers experiment
(Collaboration with AICRP on Long Term Fertilizers Experiments: “Study changes in soil quality, crop
productivity and sustainability)
Objective:
To see the changes in weed flora in soil as affected by continuous application of plant nutrients during long-term
Details of Field experiment: Rice (Rajeshwari R-I) : Wheat ( C.G. – 4 Amber) RDF : 120:60:40: N:
P2O5:K2O/ha for both rice and wheat crop
Treatments:
Tr Details
T 1 Control
T 2 50% of the recommended optimum NPK fertilizer schedule (60:30:20:: N: P2O5:K2O/ha)
T 3 100% of the rec. optimum NPK dose (120:60:40: N: P2O5:K2O/ha)
T 4 150% of the rec. optimum NPK dose (180:90:60: N: P2O5:K2O/ha)
T 5 100% of the rec. optimum NPK + ZnSo4 @ 10 kg /ha in kharif crop only (120:60:40 :: N:P2O5
:K2O + Zn SO4/ha)
T 6 100% N and P of rec. N dose of fertilizer 120:60:0: N: P2O5:K2O/ha
T 7 100% N of rec. optimum N dose (120:0:0:: N: P2O5 : K2O/ha
T 8 100% NPK + FYM (5 t/ha in kharif crop only)
9
T 9 50% NPK + BGA (10 kg/ha dry culture in kharif crop only)
T 10 50% NPK + GM (sown in site cut and mixed in soil in kharif season only)
Note: FYM, green manuring and ZnSO4 applied only in kharif season. Nitrogen, Phosphorus and potassium
fertilizers are applied as per treatments requirement during both the seasons.
Experimental Details
a. Design - RBD
b. Replications - 4
c. Plot size - 20 m x 10 m
d. Crops - Rice (Rajeshwari R-I) : Wheat ( C.G. – 4 Amber)
e. Fertilizer Sources - N – Urea, P2O5 – Single super phosphate, K2O – Muriate
of Potash, Zn – Zinc Sulphate
f. Organic Sources - FYM, Blue green algae, Green manure (Sun hemp)
Observations : As given under WP 1.1
Akola
WP 1.1.1.12 Productivity and economics of rice-chickpea cropping sequence under different
fertigation level and weed management practices.
(For Eastern Vidarbha region paddy based cropping system)
Objectives:
To study the effect of fertigation on crop growth and yield of rice-chickpea.
To study the relative performance of herbicides for control of weeds in rice-chickpea.
To study nutrient and water use efficiency through fertigation in rice-chickpea.
To study the economics of the treatments.
Treatments:
I) Main plot treatments:
A) Fertigation levels
Trt Kharif Rice (120:60:60) NPK Kg ha-1 Rabi Chickpea (25:50:30) NPK Kg ha-1
F1 100% RDF soil application (120:60:60) NPK
Kg ha-1 (N in 3 Spilts)
100% RDF soil application (25:50:30) NPK Kg
ha-1 (N in 2 Spilts)
F2 75% RDNK in 5 Splits 50% RDNK in 3 Splits
F3 100% RDNK in 5 Splits 75% RDNK in 3 Splits
F4 125% RDNK in 5 Splits 100% RDNK in 3 Splits
II) Sub plot treatments:
B) Weed management practices
Trt Kharif Rice Rabi Chickpea
W1 Pendimethalin 1 kg /ha PE fb bispyribac
sodium 0.025 Kg /ha at 25 DAS.
Pendimethalin 1 kg /ha PE fb propaquizafop
+ imazethapyr 0.125 Kg/ha at 20-25 DAS.
W2 Pretilachlor + pyrazosulfuron-ethyl 0.615 kg
/ha PE fb bispyribac sodium 0.025 Kg/ha at
25 DAS.
Oxyfluorfen 0.140 kg/ha PE fb quizalofop-
ethyl 0.050 Kg/ha at 20-25 DAS.
W3 Pretilachlor 0.75 kg /ha PE fb bispyribac-
sodium 0.025 Kg/ha at 25 DAS.
Pendimethalin 1 kg /ha PE fb topramezone
0.040 Kg/ha at 20-25 DAS.
W4 Farmer practices – 2 HW 15-20 Days
interval after sowing fb 2 hoeing
Farmer practices –2 hoeing 15-20 Days
interval after sowing fb 2 HW
W5 Weedy check Weedy check
The quantity of fertilizer in each Split through fertigation
10
Rice (Kharif) Chickpea (Rabi)
Quantity of fertilizer to be
applied
Stage of crop
(DAS)
Quantity of fertilizer to
be applied
Stage of crop
(DAS)
10% RDNK Basal 25% RDNK Basal
20% RDNK 20 DAS 25% RDNK 20 DAS
25% RDNK 40 DAS 25% RDNK 40 DAS
25% RDNK 60 DAS 25% RDNK 60 DAS
20% RDNK 80 DAS
DAS- Days after sowing, RDNK – Recommended dose of N & K
Source of fertilizer – N and K through straight fertilizer i.e. Urea and murate of postash (White-water
soluble) through drip. Phosphorus applied in the form of single super phosphate as a basal.
Design: Split Plot Design Replications: 3, Plot Size:- 4.8 X 6.0 M2
Observations : As given under WP 1.1
WP 1.1.2 Weed management in maize and maize-based cropping systems
Jorhat
WP 1.1.2.1 Integrated weed management in potato-maize cropping sequence
NEW
Objectives:
To find out the most suitable weed management practice in potato-maize cropping sequence with
maximum crop yield.
To find out effect of different combination of weed management practices on weed flora in
potato-maize cropping sequence.
Treatments:
T1: Farmers practice i.e., manual weeding (both the crop)
T2: Potato - Fallow (recommended practice)
T3: Fallow - Maize (recommended practice)
T4: Mulching with water hyacinth 6 t/ha in potato - pre-emergence application of atrazine 1 kg/ha in maize.
T5: Mulching with rice straw 6 t/ha in potato - pre-emergence application of atrazine 0.5 kg/ha +
tembotrione (120 g/ha) in maize.
T6: Use of cultivator 30 days in potato- live mulching with cowpea in maize.
T7: PE application of metribuzine 500 g/ha + one mechanical weeding in potato followed by live mulching
with cowpea in maize.
T8: PE application of metribuzine 500 g/ha + mulching with plant biomass in potato followed by live
mulching with green gram in maize.
T9: Mulching with lemongrass/citronella leaves (both the crop)
Design: RBD Replication: 3 Plot size: 4m x 3m
Observations : As given under WP 1.1
Other observations:
1. Weed control efficiency (%), Weed index (%)
11
2. Phytotoxicity on crops, if any
Jammu
WP 1.1.2.2 Effect of herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of maize-chick pea cropping system
(Collaboration Advanced Centre for Rainfed Agriculture (ACRA), SKUAST-J)
Objectives:
To study the effect of pre and post emergence herbicidal weed management on weed flora dynamics and productivity of rainfed maize and chick pea
Treatments:
S.
No. Maize
Chickpea
1. Atrazine 1000 g/ha as PRE Pendimethalin 678 g/ha as PE
2. Pyroxasulfone 127.5 g/ha as PRE Oxyfluorfen 140 g/ha as PE
3. Tembotrione 120 g/ha as POE Imazethapyr + pendimethalin (RM) 1000 g/ha as PE
4. Topramezone 25.2 g/ha POE Pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb quizalofop ethyl 50 g/ha
at 20-25 DAS
5. Tembotrione + atrazine 120 + 500 g/ha as
POE
Pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb propaquizafop 50 g/ha at
20-25 DAS
6. Topramezone + atrazine 25.2 + 500 g/ha
POE Topramezone 25.2 g/ha at 20-25 DAS
7. Mesotrione + atrazine 87.5 +875 g/ha as
POE
Propaquizafop + imazethapyr 50 + 75 g/ha at 20-25
DAS
8. Tembotrione + 2, 4-DEE 120 + 500 g/ha
as POE Fluazifop-p-butyl + fomesafen 125 g/ha POE
9. Topramezone + 2, 4-DEE 25.2 + 500 g/ha
POE Fluazifop-p-butyl + fomesafen 250 g/ha POE
10. 2 mechanical weeding at 20 & 40 DAS Mechanical weeding at 20 and 40 DAS
11. Weedy Weedy
Experiment details:
Design: RBD Plot size: 5 x 4 m Replications: 3
Observations : As given under WP 1.1.
Bhubaneswar
WP 1.1.2.3 Weed management with new generation herbicides in maize (Sweet corn) in maize-
black gram /green gram cropping system.
(Same treatment as previous experiment)
Objectives:
To evaluate the efficacy of different herbicides mixture for weed management in maize
To study the effect of different herbicides mixture on yield and yield attributes of maize
To assess herbicide residues and phytotoxicity of applied herbicides, if any on crop
Treatments:
Maize
T1: Atrazine 0.75 kg/ha PE fb HW at 40 DAS
T2: Atrazine+pendimethaline (0.50 +0.25 kg/ha) PE (tank mix)
12
T3: Atrazine1.0 kg/ha PE fb 2,4-D1.0 kg/ha LPoE
T4: Atrazine+pendimethaline (0.50 +0.25 kg/ha) PE fb 2,4-D1.0 kg/ha LPoE
T5: Topramezone 25 g/ha EPoE fb IC
T6: Tembotrione 120 g/ha EPoE fb IC
T7: Topramezone + atrazine (25 + 500 g/ha) EPoE fb IC
T8: Tembotrione + atrazine (100+ 250 g/ha) EPoE fb IC+ HW at30 DAS
T9: IC+ HW at 20 and 40 DAS
T10: Weedy check
Blackgram/greengram
Treatments Dose (g/ha) Time of application
1. Pendimethalin 38.7 678 PE
2. Oxyfluorfen 140 PE
3. Imazethapyr + pendimethalin (RM) 1000 PE
4. Pendimethalin + quizalofop-ethyl 1000+50 20-25 DAS
5. Pendimethalin + propaquizafop 1000+50 POE
6. Topramezone 25.2 20-25 DAS
7. Propaquizafop 2.5 % + imazethapyr 3.75 % 50 + 75 20-25 DAS
8. Fluazifop-p-butyl + fomesafen 125 POE
9. Mechanical weeding at 20 and 40 DAS - -
10. Farmers practice‟ HW at 20 DAS - -
Note:- DAS-Day after sowing PE -Pre-emergence
EPoE-Early post-emergence (15-20 DAS) LPoE -Late post-emergence (30-35 DAS)
IC–Inter-culturing HW-Hand weeding
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Ludhiana
WP 1.1.2.4 Integrated weed management in maize
Objective:
To develop integrated weed management approaches for maize
Treatments:
1. Unweeded check 2. Atrazine 625 g/ha as pre-emergence 3. Tembotrione 110 g/ha as post-emergence at 20 DAS 4. Black plastic mulch (25 μm) 5. Paddy straw mulch (6.25 t/ha) 6. Pyroxasulfone 76.5 g/ha as pre-emergence 7. Pyroxasulfone 102.0 g/ha as pre-emergence 8. Pyroxasulfone 127.5 g/ha as pre-emergence 9. Pyroxasulfone 150 g/ha as pre-emergence 10. Pyroxasulfone 102.0 g/ha fb paddy straw mulch 6.25 t/ha 11. Pyroxasulfone 102.0 g/ha fb inter-culture at 20-25 DAS 12. Tembotrione 37 g/ha (band spray;20cm width) fb inter-culture in inter-rows
Design: RBD Replication: 3 Plot size: 7.0 m x 4.2 m
13
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Kashmir (Volunteer centre)
WP 1.1.2.5 Response of maize to weed management practices under temperate conditions of Kashmir
Objectives:
To study the effect of weed management practices on weed dynamics in maize crop
To study the effect of weed management practices on growth and productivity of maize
To work out the effect of weed management practices on weed control performance indices
Treatments: i. Pendimethalin (PE 1.0 kg/ha) fb 1 hand hoeing at 35 DAS
ii. Atrazine (PE 1.0 kg/ha) fb 1 hand hoeing at 35 DAS iii. Pendimethalin + atrazine (Tank mixed PE 0.75 + 0.75 kg/ha) fb 1 hand hoeing at 35
DAS iv. Pendimethalin (PE 1.0 kg/ha) fb tembotrione (POE 120 g/ha at 35 DAS) v. Atrazine (PE 1.0 kg/ha) fb tembotrione (POE 120 g/ha at 35 DAS)
vi. Weed free (15, 30, 45, 60 & 75 DAS) vii. Weedy check
Design: RBD; Replication: 3; Plot size: 4.00 m x 5.00 m
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Dharwad (Volunteer centre)
WP 1.1.2.6 Weed management with new generation herbicides in maize and its residual effect on
succeeding wheat
Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy of different herbicides mixture for weed management in maize
To Study the effect of different herbicides mixture on yield and yield attributes of maize
To assess herbicide residues in soil and produce and phytotoxicity of applied herbicides
Treatments:
T1: Atrazine 1.0 kg/ha PE fb HW at 40 DAS
T2: Atrazine + pendimethalin (0.50 + 0.25 kg/ha) PE
T3: Atrazine 1.0 kg/ha PE fb 2,4-D 1.0 kg/ha LpoE (Recommended)
T4: Atrazine + pendimethalin (0.50 + 0.25 kg/ha) PE fb 2,4-D 1.0 kg/ha LPoE
T5: Topramezone 25.2 g/ha EPoE
T6: Tembotrione 120 g/ha EPoE
T7: Topramezone 25.2 g/ha EPoE fb IC + HW at 30 DAS
T8: Tembotrione 120 g/ha EPoE fb IC + HW at 30 DAS
T9: Topramezone + atrazine (25.2 + 500 g/ha) EPoE fb IC + HW at 30 DAS
T10: Tembotrione + atrazine (105 + 250 g/ha) EPoE fb IC + HW at 30 DAS
T11: IC + HW at 20 and 40 DAS
T12: Weedy check
14
Note: - DAS - Day after sowing PE - Pre -emergence
EPoE-Early post emergence (15-20 DAS) LPoE - Late post emergence (30-35 DAS)
IC – Inter-culturing HW - Hand weeding
Experimental details:
1. Season : Kharif Rabi
2. Crop : Maize Wheat
3. Variety : GM-6 GW-496
4. Seed rate : 20 kg/ha 120 kg/ha
5. Spacing : 60 cm x 20 cm 22.5 cm
6. Method of Sowing : Dibbling Drilling
7. Fertilizer : N40 + P40 kg/ha as basal
N40 kg/ha top dressing at 30 DAS
N60 + P60 kg/ha as basal
N60 kg/ha top dressing at 30
DAS
8. Design : RBD RBD
9. Replications : Three Three
10. Plot size (Gross) : 3.60 m x 5.00 m 3.60 m x 5.00 m
Net : 2.40 m × 4.20 m 2.70 m × 4.20 m
11. Water volume : 750-1000 liters/ha -
12. Spray equipment : Knapsack sprayer fitted with Flat
fan nozzle
-
Carry over study on succeeding crops: Wheat
To know the residual effect of applied herbicides, succeeding wheat crop will be grown keeping
layout as such by adopting recommended package of practices.
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Akola
WP 1.1.2.7 Productivity and economics of maize-chickpea cropping sequence under different
fertigation levels and weed management practices.
(For Western & Central Vidarbha Region)
Objectives:
To study the effect of fertigation on crop growth and yield of Maize-Chickpea.
To study the relative performance of herbicides for control of weeds in Maize-Chickpea.
To study nutrient and water use efficiency through fertigation in Maize-Chickpea.
To study the economics of the system.
Treatments:
I) Main plot treatments:
A) Fertigation levels
Trt Kharif maize (120:60:60) NPK kg/ha Rabi chickpea (25:50:30) NPK kg/ha
F1 100% RDF soil application (120:60:60) NPK
Kg/ha (N in 3 Spilts)
100% RDF soil application (25:50:30) NPK
kg/ha (N in 2 Spilts)
F2 75% RDNK in 5 Splits 50% RDNK in 3 Splits
F3 100% RDNK in 5 Splits 75% RDNK in 3 Splits
F4 125% RDNK in 5 Splits 100% RDNK in 3 Splits
II) Sub plot treatments:
15
B) Weed management practices
B) Weed management practices
Trt Maize (Kharif) chickpea (Rabi)
W1 Atrazine 0.75 kg /ha PE fb tembotrione 0.120
kg/ha POE 20 DAS
Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha PE fb propaquizafop
+ imazethapyr 0.125 kg/ha at 20-25 DAS.
W2 Atrazine 0.75 kg/ha PE fb topramezone
0.0252 kg/ha POE 20 DAS.
Oxyfluorfen 0.140 kg/ha PE fb quizalofop-
ethyl 0.050 kg/ha at 20-25 DAS.
W3 Atrazine 0.75 kg/ha PE fb halosulfuron-
methyl 0.05 kg/ha POE 20 DAS
Pendimethalin 1.0 kg /ha PE fb topramezone
0.040 kg/ha at 20-25 DAS.
W4 Farmer practices –2 hoeing 15-20 Days
interval after sowing fb 2 HW
Farmer practices –2 hoeing 15-20 Days
interval after sowing fb 2 HW
W5 Weedy check Weedy check
The quantity of fertilizer in each Split will be done through fertigation
Kharif maize Rabi chickpea
Quantity of fertilizer to be
applied
Stage of crop
(DAS)
Quantity of fertilizer to
be applied
Stage of crop (DAS)
10% RDNK Basal 50% RDNK Basal
20% RDNK 20 DAS 25% RDNK 20 DAS
25% RDNK 40 DAS 25% RDNK 40 DAS
25% RDNK 60 DAS
20% RDNK 80 DAS
DAS- Days after sowing, RDNK – Recommended dose of N & K
Source of fertilizer – N and K through straight fertilizer i.e. Urea and murate of postash (White-water
soluble) through drip. Phosphorus applied in the form of single super phosphate as a basal.
Design: Split Plot Design Replications: 3, Plot Size:- 4.8 X 6.0 M2
Observations: As given under WP 1.1.
WP 1.1.3 Weed management in blackgram/greengram/chickpea/ pigeonpea crops and
cropping systems
Udaipur
WP 1.1.3.1 Evaluation of pre and post emergence herbicides against complex weed flora in
blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) Kharif season
Objectives:
To study the bio-efficacy of combination of herbicides against complex weed flora and their effect on growth and yield of blackgram.
To study the phytotoxic effects on the crop, if any.
Treatments:
Sr.
No.
Herbicides Dose (g/ha) Time of application
1. Pendimethalin fb MC and HW at 40 DAS 750g PE (2 DAS )
2. Imazethyr + pendimethalin (RM) fb mechanical weeding at 40 DAS
750
PE (2 DAS )
3. Imazethapyr fb mechanical weeding at 40 DAS 60g PoE (15-20 DAS)
4. Imazethyr + imazamax fb mechanical weeding at 40 DAS
60g PoE (15-20 DAS)
5. Acifluorfen + clodinofop propargyl (RM) 245 g PoE (15-20 DAS)
6. Imazethapyr + quizalofop-ethyl (TM) 60g + 60g PoE (15-20 DAS)
16
7. Imazethapyr + propaquizafop (TM) 60g + 75g E PoE (15-20 DAS)
8. Oxyfluorfen + imazethapyr 10% SL 150g+75g PE (2 DAS)+ PoE (15-20 DAS)
9. Pendimethalin 3 +imazethapyr 750g + 60g
PE (2 DAS)+
PoE (15-20 DAS)
10. IC fb hand weeding at 20 and 40 days after sowing
11. Weedy check - -
Experiment details:
Design: RBD Plot size: Gross: 3.6 m x 5.0 m; Net: 2.4 m x 4.0 m Replications: 3
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Guntur (Volunteer center)
WP 1.1.3.2 Evaluation of sustainable weed management practices in different cropping systems
under Irrigated -Dry conditions for Krishna zone of Andhra Pradesh.
Site of the experiment: RARS, Lam, Guntur.
Objectives:
To study cropping systems for Krishna zone of AP with some diversification over, traditional cropping systems.
To evaluate different weed management practices for their sustainability in different cropping systems
Treatments:
Main plots (cropping systems)
1. Redgram + greengram intercropping (June to – February)- Fodder sorghum (March –
April)
2. Greengram (June to August) – Rabi redgram (Sept. to February) - fodder sorghum (March
– April)
3. Greengram (June to August) – Maize (Sept. to December) – fodder sorghum (March –
April)
Sub- plots (weed management practice)
1. Pre-emergence herbicide fb inter cultivation
2. Pre-emergence herbicide fb post emergence herbicide
3. Hand weeding at 20-25 DAS fb Intercultivation
4. No weeding (only Intercultivation)
Treatment
Crop Spacing Herbicides Dosage
PRE POST PRE POST
Redgram Kharif-180 x 20 cm
Rabi-90 x 10 cm
Pendimethalin Imazethapyr 1000g/ha 50 g/ha
Greengram 30 x 10 cm Pendimethalin Imazethapyr 750 g/ha 50 g/ha
Maize 60 x 20 cm Pendimethalin Tembotrione 1000g/ha 120 g/ha
Design: Split plot Replications: 3 Plot size: 5.4 m x 6.0 m Experimental area: 2000 m2
Observations: As given under WP 1.1.
Other observations:
1. Production efficiency (kg/ha/day); land use efficiency and economics
2. Weed control efficiency (%)
17
Sabour (Volunteer centre)
WP 1.1.3.3 Evaluation of herbicide doses and application time of topramezone on different
chickpea varieties.
Objectives:
To study the effect of herbicide doses and time of application on growth and yield of chickpea.
To study the relative performance of herbicide doses and application time against weed flora in chickpea.
Technical programme of work
A. Main plot treatments (2 Varieties)
1. GCP105
2. Sabour chana-1
B. Sub plot treatments: (3 Time of herbicide application)
1. 20-25 DAS
2. 25-30 DAS
3. 30-35 DAS
C. Sub-sub plot treatments: (4 Doses of herbicide application)
1. 0 g
2. 25 g
3. 30 g
4. 35 g
Design: Split-Split Plot Replications : 3 Spray volume: 500 L/ha
Observations: As given under WP 1.1.
Banda (Volunteer centre)
WP 1.1.3.4 Studies on herbicidal effect of imazethapyr and its ready-mix with imazemox and
pendimethalin against weeds in blackgram and their residual effect on succeeding
mustard crop
Objectives:
To study the bio-efficacy of different herbicides against weeds and their effect on growth and yield of blackgram.
To study the phytotoxic effects on the blackgram, if any.
To study the residual effect of herbicides applied in blackgram on succeeding mustard crop
Treatments:
Herbicides Dose (g/ha) Time of
application
T1 Imazethypyr 50 g PE
T2 Imazethypyr 60 g PE
T3 Imazethypyr 50 g (3-4 leaf stage)
T4 Imazethypyr 60 g (3-4 leaf stage)
T5 Imazethypyr + imazamox (RM) 50 g PE
T6 Imazethypyr + imazamox (RM) 60 g PE
T7 Imazethypyr + imazamox (RM) 50 g (3-4 leaf stage)
T8 Imazethypyr + imazamox (RM) 60 g (3-4 leaf stage)
T9 Pendimethalin 1000 g PE
T10 Imazethypyr + pendimethalin (RM) 1000 g PE
18
T11 Hoeing (2) ----------- 15 and 30 DAS
T12 Weedy check ---- ----
T13 Weed free ---- ----
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Banda (Volunteer centre)
WP1.1.3.5 Weed dynamics and productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under pre- and post-
emergence application of herbicides.
Objectives:
To study the bio-efficacy of different herbicides against weeds
To study the effect of weed control measures on growth and yield of chickpea
To assess the efficacy of weed management methods on economics of chickpea
Treatments:
Treatments Herbicide/ treatments Rate of application
(g/ha)
Time of
application
T1 Weedy check
T2 Weed free Upton 60 days
T3 Pendimethalin + 1 HW 1000 PE
T4 Oxyfluorfen + 1 HW 100 g PE
T5 Imezathapyr 40 g 20 DAS (PoE)
T6 Quizalofop-ethyl 50 g 25-30 DAS (PoE)
T7 Topramezone 20g PoE
T8 Topramezone 25g PoE
T9 Clodinafop-propargyl + Na-acifluorfen 500g PoE
T10 Pendimethalin + imazathapyr 1000 g+ 40 g PE + PoE
T11 Pendimethalin + quizalofop-ethyl 1000 g+ 50 g PE + PoE
T12 Oxyfluorfen + imazathapyr 100 g+ 40 g PE + PoE
T13 Oxyfluorfen + quizalofop-ethyl 100 g+ 50 g PE + PoE
Replications-3; Design- RBD; Plot size – 5x3 m= 15 m2 Chickpea variety JG-14
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Banda (Volunteer centre)
WP 1.1.3.6 Weed management in sesame under chickpea – sesame cropping sequence.
Objectives:
To study the effect of different weed control methods against weeds.
To study the effect of weed control methods on growth, yield and economics of sesame.
Replication- 3 Design: RBD
Plot size: 15 sqm Total area 700-800 sqm
Treatments:
T1- Un-weeded Check
T2- Two hand weeding
T3- Pendimethalin 1 kg/ha
T4- Imezathapyr 0.04 kg/ha PE
19
T5- Imezathapyr 0.04 kg/ha Early PoE
T6 -Pendimethalin 1 kg/ha + 1HW
T7- Imezathapyr 0.04 kg/ha PE + 1 HW
T8- Quizalofop-p-ethyl 0.05 kg/ha PoE
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Thrissur
WP 1.1.3.7 Integrated weed management in greengram in summer rice fallows
Objective:
To develop integrated weed management strategy for greengram
Treatments:
1. Stale seed bed for 14 days followed by shallow digging 2. Stale seed bed for 14 days followed by shallow digging, followed by oxyfluorfen, 0.15 kg/ha, 0-3
DAS
3. Oxyfluorfen, 0.15 kg/ha, 0-3 DAS followed by one hand weeding at 25 DAS 4. Imazethapyr, 50 g/ha 0-3 DAS followed by one hand weeding at 25 DAS 5. Imazethapyr + imazamox (pre-mix), 80 g/ha 0-3 DAS followed by one hand weeding at 25 DAS 6. Diclosulam, 15 g/ha 0-3 DAS followed by one hand weeding at 25 DAS 7. Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS 8. Unweeded control
Design: RBD; Replications: 3; Plot size: 20 sq. m; Season: Summer 2020
The crop will be sown in November, after harvest of Kharif rice.
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Hisar
WP 1.1.3.8 Evaluation of herbicides against complex weed flora in pigeonpea
Objectives:
To study the bio-efficacy of combination of herbicides against complex weed flora and their effect on growth and yield of pigeonpea
To study the phytotoxic effects on crops, if any
Treatments:
S.No. Treatments Dose (g/ha) Time of
application
1. Pyroxasulfone fb imazethapyr 127.5 & 100 PRE & PoE
2. Pendimethalin fb one mechanical weeding 1500 PRE & 45 DAS
3. Pendimethalin fb imazethapyr 1500 & 100 PRE & PoE
4. Pendimethalin fb one mechanical weeding 1000 PRE & 45 DAS
5. Pendimethalin fb imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 1500 &40 PRE & PoE
6. Pendimethalin + imazethapyr EC (RM) fb one mechanical weeding
1000 PRE &PoE fb 45
DAS
7. Propaquizafop + imazethapyr (RM) 50+75 PoE
8. Pendimethalin + imazethapyr (TM) 1000 +75 PRE
9. Two mechanical weedings (manual hoe/power weeder) - 20 and 45 DAS
10. Weedy check - -
11. Weed free - -
20
*Pigeon pea is planted at distance of 45 cms R- R spacing. At 45 DAS, only manual hoe is possible to
avoid damage to crop plants. Weed free treatment means to keep the plot weed free as and when weeds
appear. The yield obtained in various treatments will be compared with this and weedy check treatment.
Design: RBD Replications: 3 Plot size: 6 x 6 M Spray volume: 500 L/ha
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
WP 1.1.4 Weed management in groundnut based system
Bhubaneswar
WP 1.1.4.1 Weed management and fertility levels on growth, yield and soil health in groundnut – okra cropping system
Objective:
To find out the effect of weed management practices along with fertility levels (organic & inorganic) on soil health in groundnut-okra cropping system.
Treatments:
Kharif (Ground nut)
Fertility levels:
T1: 100 % Recommended dose of fertilizer
T2: 75% Recommended dose of fertilizer + 25% N through FYM
T3: 50% Recommended dose of fertilizer + 50% N through FYM
T4: Without fertilizer + Without FYM
Weed management practices:
T1: Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor 0.5 kg/ha (2 DAS)
T2: Earle post emergence application of imazythapyr 0.075 kg/ha (15 DAS)
T3: Manual weeding (20 & 40 DAS)
T4: Twin wheel hoe fb HW at 40 DAS
Rabi (Okra)
Fertility levels:
T1: 100 % Recommended dose of fertilizer
T2: 75% Recommended dose of fertilizer + 25% N through FYM
T3: 50% Recommended dose of fertilizer + 50% N through FYM
T4: Without fertilizer + Without FYM
Weed management practices:
T1: Pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha (2 DAS)
T2: Pre emergence application of pretilachlor 0.5 kg /ha (15 DAS)
T3: Manual weeding (20 & 40 DAS)
T4: Twin wheel hoe fb HW at 40 DAS
Design: Factorial RCBD with 4 replications, Plot size: 25 m2 (5 m x 5m)
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Udaipur
21
WP 1.1.4.2 Integrated weed management in groundnut-wheat cropping system
Objectives:
To evaluate the efficacy of different weed management practices on weeds in groundnut-wheat cropping system
To study the effect of different weed management practices on growth and yield
Crop: Groundnut; Year of commencement: Kharif, 2020
Tr.
No.
Treatments Dose g/ha Time of
application
T1: Pendimethalin + imazethapyr (RM) 750 PE
T2: Oxyfluorfen fb imazethapyr 180 fb
100
PE fb POE
T3: Oxyfluorfen fb imazamox + imazethapyr (Pre-mix) 180 fb 70 PE fb POE
T4: Imazethapyr fb IC + HW at 40 DAS 100 POE
T5: Imazethapyr + propaquizafop (RM- Shaked) 125 POE
T6: Imazethapyr + propaquizafop
(RM- Shaked) fb IC + HW at 40 DAS
125 POE
T7: Imazethyr + imazamax (Pre-mix) 70 POE
T8: Imazethyr + imazamax (Pre-mix) fb HW at 40 DAS 70 POE
T9: Fluazifop-p-butyl + fomesafen (Pre-mix) 250 POE
T10: Fluazifop-p-butyl + fomesafen (Pre-mix) fb IC + HW at
40 DAS
250 POE
T11: IC fb HW at 20 and 40 DAS - -
T12: Farmers practice - -
Crop: Wheat; Year of commencement: Rabi, 2020-21
Treatment:
Tr.
No.
Treatments Dose
g/ha
Time of
application
T1: Carfentrazone-ethyl 20 POE at 35 DAS
T2: Sulfosulfuron 25 POE at 35 DAS
T3: Metsulfuron-methyl 4 POE at 35 DAS
T4: Carfentrazone-ethyl + sulfosulfuron 500 POE at 35 DAS
T5: Pinoxaden + carfentrazone (Tank mix) 60+20 POE at 35 DAS
T6: Clodinafop- propargyl
+ carfentrazone (Tank mix)
60+20 POE at 35 DAS
T7: Sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron (Premix) 30+2 POE at 35 DAS
T8: Pinoxaden + metsulfuron (Tank mix) 60+4 POE at 35 DAS
T9: Mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron (Premix) 12 + 2.4 POE at 35 DAS
T10: Clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl ( Premix) 60 + 4 POE at 35 DAS
T11: Two hand weedings at 30 and 45 DAS
T12: Weedy check
Note:
DAS = Days After Sowing
HW = Hand Weeding
PE = Pre emergence
PoE = Post emergence (25-30 DAS)
EPoE = Post emergence (10-15 DAS)
Experimental details
22
Design: RBD Replications: 03 Plot Size: Gross: 3.6 m x 5.0 m; Net: 2.4 m x 4.0 m
Observations: 1. Plant stand (no./m row length) at 15 DAS and at harvest 2. Plant height (cm) at 30 and 60 DAS and at harvest 3. Weed count (no./m2) and weed dry biomass (g/m2) (Monocot and Dicot group wise) at 30
and 60 DAS & at harvest
4. Phytotoxicity on crop, if any at 7 and 14 days after herbicide application (0 to 10 scales) 5. Weed control efficiency (%) 6. Pod and haulm yield (kg/ha) 7. Microbial properties after application of herbicides (30 DAS and harvest) 8. Carry over effect on succeeding groundnut crop 9. Economics
WP 1.1.5: Weed management in cotton based inter cropping system
Hyderabad
WP 1.1.5.1 Integrated weed management in cotton based inter cropping system
Objectives:
To study the effect of pre and post emergence herbicides on weed growth in cotton under intercropping
To study the integrated weed management practices on growth and yield of cotton under intercropping
To study the economics of weed management in intercropped cotton
Treatments:
Main plots: Intercrops
1. Sole cotton
2. Cotton + sesame (non-legume)
3. Cotton + soybean (legume)
4. Cotton + dhaincha (green manure crop ) and mulching at 45 DAS
Sub- plots: Weed Management Methods
Sole cotton Cotton +
soybean
Cotton + sesame Cotton +
Dhaincha
W1 IWM
Diuron 0.75 kg/ha
(PE) fb intercultivation
at 30 and 45 DAS
Pendimethalin
640 g/ha (PE) fb
hand weeding at
30 and 45 DAS
Pendimethalin
640 g/ha (PE) fb
hand weeding at
30 and 45 DAS
Pendimethalin
640 g/ha (PE) fb
hand weeding at
30 DAS and
incorporation of
Dhaincha at
40DAS
W2 Herbicidal control
Diuron 0.75kg/ha (PE)
fb pyrithiobac sodium
62.5 g/ha +
quizalofop-ethyl 50
g/ha (POE) at 2-3 leaf
stage of the weeds
Pendimethalin38.
7 CS 640 g/ha
(PE) fb
quizalofop- ethyl
45 g/ha (POE, 25
DAS)
Pendimethalin
640 g/ha (PE) fb
quizalofop ethyl
45 g/ha (POE, 25
DAS)
Pendimethalin
640 g/ha (PE) fb
quizalofop- ethyl
45 g/ha (POE, 25
DAS)
W3 Hand
weeding/Mechnaical
control
30 and 60 DAS 30 and 60 DAS 30 and 60 DAS 30 and 30 DAS
23
Design: Split plot; Replications: 3 ; Plot size: 5.4 x 4.2 m
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Karaikal (Volunteer centre)
WP 1.1.5.2 Integrated weed management in cotton based inter cropping system
Objectives
To study the effect of pre and post emergence herbicides on weed growth in cotton under intercropping
To study the integrated weed management practices on growth and yield of cotton under intercropping
To study the economics of weed management in intercropped cotton
Treatments:
Main plots: Intercrops
1. Sole cotton
2. Cotton + sesame (non-legume)
3. Cotton + greengram/blackgram (legume)
4. Cotton + dhaincha (green manure crop ) and mulching at 45 DAS
Sub- plots: Weed Management Methods
Sole cotton Cotton +
soybean
Cotton + sesame Cotton +
Dhaincha
W1 IWM
Pendimethalin 640
g/ha (PE) fb hand
weeding at 30& 45
DAS
Pendimethalin
640 g/ha (PE) fb
hand weeding at
30 and 45 DAS
Pendimethalin
640 g/ha (PE) fb
hand weeding at
30 and 45 DAS
Pendimethalin
640 g/ha (PE) fb
hand weeding at
30 DAS and
incorporation of
Dhaincha at
45DAS
W2 Herbicidal control
Pendimethalin 640
g/ha (PE) fb
pyrithiobac-sodium
62.5 g/ha +
quizalofop- ethyl 50
g/ha (POE) at 2-3 leaf
stage of the weeds
Pendimethalin38.
7 CS 640 g/ha
(PE) fb
quizalofop -ethyl
45 g/ha (POE, 25
DAS)
Pendimethalin
640 g /ha (PE) fb
quizalofop ethyl
45 g /ha
(POE,
25 DAS)
Pendimethalin
640 g/ha (PE) fb
quizalofop-ethyl
45 g/ha (POE, 25
DAS)
W3 Hand
weeding/Mechnaica
l control
30 and 60 DAS 30 and 60 DAS 30 and 60 DAS 30 and 30 DAS
Design: Split plot Replications: 3 Plot size: 5.4 x 4.2 m
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
WP 1.1.6 Weed management in millets
Hyderabad
24
WP 1.1.6.1 Bio-efficacy and phytotoxicity of herbicides and herbicide mixtures for weed control in
finger millet.
Year of Initiation: 2020-21 Duration: 2 years
Objectives:
To study the bio-efficacy of herbicides and herbicide combinations on weed growth in fingermillet
To find out the phytotoxicity of herbicides if any and effect on growth and yield of fingermillet
To find out the economic combination of pre and post emergence herbicides for finger millet
Treatments:
T1: Isoproturon 750 g/ha as PE fb bispyribac-sodium 15 g/ha as POE
T2: Oxadiargyl 80 g/ha at as PE fb bispyribac-sodium 15 g/ha as POE
T3: Bensulfuron methyl + pretilachlor 660 g / ha as PE fb bispyribac-sodium 15 g/ha as POE
T4: Isoproturon 750 g/ha as PE + metsulfuron-methyl fb chlorimuron-ethyl 4g/ha as POE
T5: Oxadiargyl 80g/ha at as PE metsulfuron-methyl fb chlorimuron-ethyl 4 g/ha as POE
T6: Bensulfuron-methyl + pretilachlor 6% GR 660 g/ha as PE fb metsulfuron-methyl + chlorimuron-
ethyl 4g/ha as POE
T7: Isoproturon 750g/ha as PE fb mechanical weeding at 30 DAT
T8: Oxadiargyl 80% WP 80g/ha at as PE fb mechanical weeding at 30 DAT
T9: Bensulfuron methyl + pretilachlor 660 g/ha as PE fb mechanical weeding at 30 DAT
T10: Hand weeding twice at 20 DAT and 40 DAT
T11: Weedy check
Design: RBD; Gross Plot Size: 4.8 m x 4.0 m; Net Plot Size :4.2 m x 3.4 m; Spacing :
(30ҳ10cm)
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Karaikal (Volunteer centre)
WP 1.1.6.2 Weed management in transplanted finger millet
Objectives:
To study the influence of weed management on weed dynamics, crop growth and productivity
To study the influence of weed management treatment on economics
Treatments:
Treatment Dose (g/ha) Time (DAP)
T1 Stale seed bed technique alone (SSB)*
T2 Intercultivation (IC) twice 100 20 & 40
T3 Bensulfuron methyl+pretilachlor (PE) 60+600 0-3
T4 Bispyribac-sodium (PoE) 20 20
T5 Stale seed bed technique alone fb bensulfuron-
methyl+pretilachlor
60+600 0-3
T6 Stale seed bed technique alone fb bispyribac- sodium 20 20
T7 Bensulfuron methyl+pretilachlor fb intercultivation
(IC) once
60+600 0-3/ 40
T8 Bispyribac- sodium fb intercultivation (IC) once 20 20/ 40
T9 Bensulfuron methyl+pretilachlor fb hand weeding
once
60+600 0-3/ 40
T10 Bispyribac-sodium fb hand weeding once 20 20/ 40
T11 Hand weeding twice 20 & 40
25
T12 Unweeded control
Glyphosate will be sprayed 15 days before experiment in the SSB Season: June 2020- Aug 2020 Design:RBD; Replications:3
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Kalyani
WP 1.1.7: Identification of suitable weed management strategy in lentil under rainfed situation
Objectives:
To study the effect of different control measures on weeds, crop growth and yield of lentil.
To study the efficacy of post emergence herbicides on weeds in lentil. To study the economics of weed control measures in the trial.
Treatments:
Treatments Lentil
T1 Metolachlor PE 1.0 Kg/ha fb quizalofop-ethyl 0.05kg/ha PoE
T2 Metolachlor PE 1.0 Kg/ha fb one hand weeding at 25 DAS
T3 Pendimethalin 1000 g/ha PE
T4 Isoproturon 750 g/ha post-emergence
T5 Pendimethalin + imazethapyr (960 + 40 g/ha) PE
T6 Pendimethalin + imazethapyr (720 + 30 g/ha) PE
T7 Pendimethalin + isoproturon (1000 + 750 g/ha) PE
T8 Mechanical weeding by hand grubber
T9 Hand weeding at 20 DAS
T10 Weedy check (control)
Design of experiment: RCBD Replication: 3 Plot size: 5m x 4m
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Kashmir (Volunteer centre)
WP 1.1.8: Study of weed flora and its management in lentil under temperate condition
Objectives:
To study the effect of weed management practices on weed dynamics and control of weeds
To study the effect of weed management practices on growth and productivity of lentil
Treatments: i. Pendimethalin (1kg/ha PE)
ii. Pendimethalin (1 kg/ha PE) fb prometryn (0.5 kg/ha POE) iii. Pendimethalin (1 kg/ha PE) fb fluazifop-p-butyl (0.1 kg/ha POE) iv. Pendimethalin (1 kg/ha PE) fb quizalofop-p-ethyl (0.05 kg/ha POE) v. Pendimethalin (1 kg/ha PE) fb imazethapyr (0.04 kg/ha POE)
vi. Pendimethalin (1 kg/ha PE) fb two manual weeding (spring) vii. Prometryn (0.5 kg/ha PE)
viii. Prometryn (0.5 kg/ha PE) fb fluazifop-p-butyl (0.1 kg/ha POE) ix. Prometryn (0.5 kg/ha PE) fb quizalofop-p-ethyl (0.05 kg/ha POE) x. Prometryn (0.5 kg/ha PE) fb imazethapyr (0.04 kg/ha POE)
xi. Prometryn (0.5 kg/ha PE) fb two manual weeding (spring) xii. Three manual weeding at 20 days interval during spring
26
xiii. Weedy check
Design: RBD Replication: 03; Plot size: 3.75 m x 4.00 m
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Pantnagar
WP 1.1.9: Management and in situ utilization of weeds in different cropping systems.
(Collaboration with Net work project on Integrated Farming Systems)
Objectives:
To find out the weed management practices under cropping system
Management and utilization of the weeds in situ under different cropping systems
A. Management and utilization of weeds in situ under agri - horti cropping system
Litchi + peach
Black gram-coriander- maize
Existing treatment
Blackgram-Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha (Pre-emergence)
Coriander – Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha (pre-emergence)
Maize – Atrazine 500 g/ha (pre-emergence) fb one hand weeding
Suggested treatment
Blackgram- Imazethapyr 100 g/ha (Post-emergence)
Coriander – Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha (pre-emergence) fb one hand weeding
Maize – Topramezone 33.6 g/ha (Post-emergence) fb one hand weeding
Plot size: 63m x 27m
The data will be analyzed by using T- test
B- Widely spaced sugarcane & maize
Sugarcane:
Existing treatment
Sugarcane single row (spacing75cm)-Atrazine 1.0 kg/ha (Pre-emergence) fb two hand weedings
Suggested treatment
Sugarcane paired row (spacing 120 cm)-Topramezone 25 g/ha (Post-emergence) fb Mechanical
weeder
Plot size: 40m x 40m
The data will be analyzed by using T- test
Maize:
Existing treatment
Atrazine 500 g/ha (Pre-emergence) fb one hand weeding
Suggested treatment
Topramezone 33.6 g/ha Post-emergence
Plot size: 18m x 45m
The data will be analyzed by using T- test
Observations:
27
1. Weed density and dry weight (species wise and total) at different crop growth stages 2. Energy & economics 3. Productivity
Kashmir (Volunteer centre)
WP 1.1.10: Weed flora study in nursery and high density orchard of apple.
Objectives:
To study the effect of weed management practices on weed dynamics in apple high density orchard
To study the effect of weed management practices on growth of apple plants
To work out the effect of weed management practices on weed control performance indices
Treatments:
i. Pendimethalin (PE 1.0 kg/ha)
ii. Atrazine (PE 1.0 kg/ha)
iii. Pendimethaline (PE 1.0 kg/ha) fb glyphosate (*POE 1.0 kg/ha)
iv. Atrazine (PE 1.0 kg/ha) fb glyphosate (*POE 1.0 kg/ha)
v. Pendimethalin (PE 1.0 kg/ha) fb paraquat (*POE 1.0 kg/ha)
vi. Atrazine (PE 1.0 kg/ha) fb paraquat (*POE 1.0 kg/ha)
vii. Weed free
viii. Weedy check
* Protected spray of POE herbicide
Design: RBD; Replication: 3;
Plot size: 7.5 m row line with spacing of 1.5 m plant to plant i.e. 5 plants in each row
Observations:
1. Weed density (Number/m2) at 30 and 60 days after first spray 2. Weed dry matter (g m-2) at 30 and 60 days after first spray 3. Number of branching 4. Number of leaves 5. Fruit yield 6. Economics analysis
Jammu
WP 1.1.11: Effect of different weed management practices in marigold
(Collaboration with Division of Vegetable & Floriculture, SKUAST-Jammu)
Objectives:
To study the effect of integrated weed management in marigold
Treatments:
S. No. Treatment
1. Pendimethalin 1.5 kg/ha as PE
2. Oxyfluorfen 200 g/ha as PE
3. Quizalofop ethyl 50 g/ha as POE
4. Propaquizafop 50 g/ha as POE
5. Propaquizafop 100 g/ha as POE
6. Pendimethalin 1.5 kg/ha as PE fb quizalofop-ethyl 50 g/ ha as POE
28
7. Oxyfluorfen 200 g/ha as PE fb quizalofop-ethyl 50 g/ ha as POE
8. Pendimethalin 1.5 kg/ha as PE fb propaquizafop 50 g/ha as POE
9. Oxyfluorfen 200 g/ha as PE fb propaquizafop 50 g/ha as POE
10. Pendimethalin 1.5 kg/ha as PE fb propaquizafop 100 g/ha as POE
11. Oxyfluorfen 200 g/ha as PE fb propaquizafop 100 g/ha as POE
12. Pendimethalin 1.5 kg/ha as PE fb 1 HW
13. Oxyfluorfen 200 g/ha as PE fb 1 HW
14. Quizalofop ethyl 50 g/ ha as POE fb 1 HW
15. Propaquizafop 50 g/ha as POE fb 1 HW
16. Propaquizafop 100 g/ha as POE fb 1 HW
18. Mechanical weeding 20 & 40 DAS
Experiment details: Design: RBD Replications: 3 Plot size: 4 m X 4 m
Observations:
1. Weed density and dry weight (species wise and total) at different crop growth stages 2. Plant height, branches/plant, flower/ plant and flower yield/ha. 3. Economics analysis 4. Phytotoxicity on crops, if any
Pantnagar
OLD
WP 1.1.12: Evaluation of different herbicides in spring planted sugarcane
Objectives:
To find out the effect of different herbicides on weeds, growth and yield of sugarcane.
To observe the phytotoxicity of different herbicides on sugarcane.
To work out economics of different treatments.
Treatments:
S. No. Treatments Dose (g/ha) Time of application
Metribuzin 1000 PRE
Metribuzin + haosufuron methyl (TM) 1000+67.5 PRE
Atrazine 2000 PRE
Atrazine + halosulfuron (TM) 2000+67.5 PRE
Metribuzin +halosulfuron (TM) 1000+67.5 PoE 40 DAP
Atrazine + halosulfuron (TM) 2000+67.5 PoE 40 DAP
Metribuzin fb halosulfuron 1000 & 67.5 PRE fb 40 DAP-PoE
Atrazine fb halosulfuron 2000 & 67.5 PRE fb 40 DAP-PoE
Sulfentrazone fb hoeing fb 2,4-D 720 & 1000 PRE fb 45 DAP fb 60 DAP-PoE
Sulfentrazonefb hoeing fb almix 720 & 4 PRE fb 45 DAP fb 60 DAP-PoE
Atrazine fb 2,4-D 2000 & 1000 PRE fb 60 DAP-PoE
Hoeing after first irrigation fb atrazine after
second irrigation
2000 POE to sugarcane but PRE to
weeds
Glyphosate (41% SL) + metribuzin+ surfactant
(1%)-(TM)
1860 + 1000 15 DAS-EPoE
Atrazine fb metsulfuron + carfentrazone (RM) 2000 & 25 PRE fb PoE-60 DAP
Atrazine fb hoeing fb topramizone 2000 & 25 PRE fb 45 DAP fb 60 DAP-PoE
Paraquat fb atrazine 800 & 2000 15 DAS-EPoE fb 60 DAP-PoE
29
Three hoeing (30, 60 and 90 DAP) - 30, 60 and 90 DAP
Mechanical weeding 20 and 40 DAS - -
Design: RBD; Replications: 3 Varieties: COP90223
Plot size: 4.5 m x 6.0 m Seed rate: 87.5 q/ha
Observations:
A)Weeds
1. Weed density and dry weight (species wise and total) at 45, 75, 105 and 135 DAP 2. Visual and actual weed control (%) at 45, 75, 105 and 135 days after planting
3. Phytotoxicity (%) of different treatments, if any ( 60 and 75 DAP)
4. Weed control efficiency (%) at 45, 75, 105 and 135 DAP
5. Weed index
B) Sugarcane
1. Germination per cent at 20 and 40 days after planting
2. Tiller count (000/ha) at monthly intervals 45, 75, 105 and 135 DAP
3. Light interception studies at 75 and 135 DAP
4. Dry matter accumulation of sugarcane (g/running metre) at 75, 135, 195, 255 DAP and at
harvest
5. Number of millable canes (000/ha), cane length (cm), single cane weight (g) and cane girth
(cm) at harvest
6. Cane yield (t/ha)
7. Commercial cane sugar (%) at harvest
8. Sugar yield (t/ha)
C) Economics
1. Variable cost (Rs/ha)
2. Gross returns (Rs/ha)
3. Net returns (Rs/ha)
4. B : C ratio
Kalyani
WP 1.1.13: Weed management in olitorius jute (Year of commencement: 2021)
Objectives:
To find out the effect of different weed control measures on weeds in jute.
To study the effect of different weed control measures on yield attributes and yield of jute.
To work out economics of different treatments
Treatments:
T1-Pretilachlor 750 g/ha at 2 DAS fb propaquizalofop 80 g/ha at 25 DAS
T2-Ipfencarbazone 70 g/ha immediately after sowing fb propaquizalofop 80 g/ha at 25 DAS
T3-Ipfencarbazone 90 g/ha immediately after sowing fb propaquizalofop 80 g/ha at 25 DAS
T4-Ipfencarbazone 70 g/ha immediately after sowing fb hand weeding at 30 DAS
T5-Ipfencarbazone 90 g/ha immediately after sowing fb hand weeding at 30 DAS
T6- Nail weeder at 12 DAS fb Thinning+hand weeding at 25 and 40 DAS
T7- Thinning+hand weeding at 12 DAS fb hand weeding at 25 and 40 DAS
T8-Intercropping with red amaranthus
T9-Weedy check
Design: RCBD; Replication: 3; Plot size: 4 m x 5 m
30
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
Bengaluru
WP 1.1.14 : Evaluation of herbicides against weed complex of french bean (Kharif) -field bean
(Rabi) cropping system
French beans as vegetables are quite popular in India. It is very tasty and also nutritious being
leguminous. Its tender beans and matured seeds both are used as vegetable. It is a short duration crop
mainly grown in Kharif. But if irrigation facilities are available, it can be grown in Rabi and summer
seasons.
Objectives:
To evaluate the effective methods of weed control on growth and yield of French Bean and Field bean cropping system
To study the effect of herbicides on growth and yield of French bean and Field bean cropping system on weed intensity and weed control efficiency.
To work out the economics.
Treatments:
Kharif - French bean Rabi - Field bean
T1- Pendimethalin 750 g/ha (PE)
T2- Pendimethalin 1000 g/ha (PE)
T3- Oxadiargyl 60 g/ha (PE)
T4- Oxadiargyl 75 g/ha (PE)
T5- Oxyfluorfen 150 g/ha (PE)
T6- Oxyfluorfen 200 g/ha ((PE)
T7- Metribuzin 500 g/ha (PE)
T8- Metribuzin 750 g/ha (PE)
T9- Pretilachlor 500g/ha (PE)
T10- Pretilachlor 1000 g/ha (PE)
T11- One hand weeding at 25 DAS
T12- Weedy check
T1- Pendimethalin 1000 g/ha (PE)
T2- Oxadiazone 200g /ha (PE)
T3- Oxadiazone 250 g/ha (PE)
T4- Oxadiagryl 60 g/ha (PE)
T5-Oxadiagryl 75g/ha (PE)
T6- Oxyflurofen100g/ha (PE)
T7- Oxyflurofen 125 g/ha (PE)
T8- Sodium aciflurofan + clodinafop-propargyl (206 +100 g/ha) (POE)
T9- Fluazifop-p-butyl + fomesafen 250 g/ha (POE)
T10-Imazethypyr 75g/ha (POE)
T11- Hand weeding twice
T12- Weedy check
Design: RCBD; Replications:03; Spacing: 45 x 30cm; Gross plot size: 5.4 m × 4.0 m
Observations: As given under WP 1.1
WP 1.2 Weed management under resource conservation techniques
WP 1.2.1 Weed management in different cropping systems under conservation agriculture
systems
Objectives:
To monitor weed dynamics, crop productivity, resource use efficiency and herbicide residues under long-term tillage and residue management practices
To study C-sequestration and changes in physico-chemical and biological properties of soil
Treatment: Given below centre-wise
Observations (To be taken in each experiment under WP 1.2)
1. Weed emergence - population (species-wise) and dry matter accumulation (category-wise –
a. sedge, grasses, BLW, total) at 30, 60 DAS/T and harvest and base year observations.
2. Crop growth parameters (plant height, dry matter production and no. of effective tillers,) at 60
31
a. DAS/DAT, and at harvest and yield (grain and straw) at harvest
3. Continuous monitoring of shift in weed species as compared to base year
4. Weed seed bank studies soil depth wise 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm depths soil samples just after summer and before kharif season. Minimum of 3 kg soils need to be collected and seed bank
study will be conducted in trays.
5. Energetic and economics of tillage and weed management practices
6. C-sequestration, physico-chemical and biological properties of soil– initial and after end of each
a. cycle
7. Effect on soil micro-flora (bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes) due to tillage and weed management practices
8. Instead of estimating microbial populations only estimation of beneficial microorganisms such as:
a. Total free nitrogen fixers b. Total P- solubilizing microorganisms c. Per cent root colonization by AM fungi at 50 DAS d. Soil microbial activity e. Microbial biomass carbon f. Soil respiration/urease, dehydrogenase and phosphatase activity
9. Quantify the amount of green manure added under different treatments. 10. Record visual observation may be recorded on Sesbania population for residual toxicity if any of
previous crops herbicides and can be compared to unweeded control
WP 1.2.1.1 Rice-based cropping systems
Bhubaneswar
OLD
WP 1.2.1.1.1 Weed management in rice-maize-cowpea cropping system under conservation
agriculture (Year of Commencement: Kharif- 2013)
Treatments:
A. Tillage and residue management (main plot) Tillage (main plot): Kharif (rice) Rabi (maize) summer (cow pea)
KharifV (rice) Rabi (maize) Summer
(cowpea)
T1 CT (Transplanted) CT CT
T2 CT (Transplanted) ZT ZT
T3 CT (Direct seeded) CT ZT
T4 ZT (Direct seeded) ZT+R ZT
T5 ZT+R(Direct seeded) ZT+R ZT+R
B. Weed control (subplot) H1 – Rice: Pretilachlor 0.75 g/ha; Maize: atrazine+pendimethalin (500+500 g/ha) /cow pea :
Pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha:
H2 IWM (Rice: Mechanical weeding with herbicide Pretilachlor 0.75 kg/ha fb mw ; Maize/cow pea:
Pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha with one manual weeding)
H3 – One hand weeding at 25 DAS
Design : Strip plot
32
Replication : Three
Plot size : 10×5 m2
Observations: As given under WP 1.2
SKUAST, Jammu
OLD
WP 1.2.1.1.2 Weed management in rice-wheat-green manure cropping system under conservation
agriculture (Year of commencement: Kharif 2016)
Collaboration: Division of Soil Science & Agri. Chem., SKUAST-Jammu.
Objectives:
To monitor weed dynamics, crop productivity and resource-use efficiency under long-term tillage and residue management practices
To study C-sequestration and changes in physico-chemical and biological properties of soil
Treatments:
A. Tillage and residue management (main plot)
Treatment Kharif (Rice) Rabi (Wheat) Summer (Sesbania as green
manure)
1 CT (Transplanted) CT ZT Green manure
2 CT (Transplanted) ZT ZT Green manure
3 CT (Direct -seeded) CT ZT Green manure
4 ZT (Direct -seeded) ZT+R ZT Green manure
5 ZT (Direct -seeded) + R ZT + R ZT+ R Green manure
B. Weed management (sub plot)
Treatment Kharif (Rice) Rabi (Wheat) Summer
(Sesbania as
green manure)
1 Recommended
herbicides
DSR: Pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as
PE fb bispyribac-sodium 25
g/ha
CT -Transplanted:
bispyribac-sodium 25 g/ha
Sulfosulfuron +
metsulfuron (30+2
g/ha) at 30 DAS
-
2 Integrated weed
management
(herbicide + hand
weeding)
DSR: Pendimethalin 1 kg/ha
as PE fb bispyribac-sodium 25
g/ha at 25 DAS fb HW at 45
DAS
CT Transplanted: bispyribac-
sodium 25 g/ha + 1 HW (45
DAT)
Sulfosulfuron +
metsulfuron (30+2
g/ha) at 30 DAS fb
HW at 45 DAS
-
3 Weedy check
One hand weeding after
observation at 60 DAS)
One hand weeding
after observation at 60
DAS)
-
Design: Split plot; Replications: 3; Plot size: 10 m x 8.8 m
Note: Residual studies in this experiment may not be allotted to Jammu centre.
Observations: as given under WP 1.2
Jorhat
33
WP 1.2.1.1.3 Weed management in rice-mustard-green manure cropping system under
conservation agriculture (Year of commencement Kharif 2016): The trial will
continue as approved.
OLD
Treatments:
Tillage and residue management (main plot)
Treatment Kharif (rice) Rabi (mustard) Summer (green manure)
1. CT (Transplanted) CT CT
2. CT (Transplanted MT MT
3. CT (Direct -seeded) CT MT
4. MT (Direct -seeded) MT+R MT
5. MT (Direct -seeded) + R MT + R MT + R
Weed management (sub plot)
W1-Recommended herbicides (Pretilachlor 0.750 kg/ha pre-em in rice, pendimethalin 0.750 kg/ha pre-em
in rapeseed,
W2-Integrated weed management (Pretilachlor 0.750 kg/ha pre-em in rice + one mechanical weeding,
pendimethalin 0.750 kg/ha pre-em in rapeseed + one mechanical weeding,
W3-One hand weeding/hoeing
W4-Weedy check
Design: Split plot; Replications: 3 ; Plot size: 20 x 10 m = 200 m2
Observations: as given under WP 1.2
Raipur
OLD WP 1.2.1.1.4 Weed management in rice-wheat-cowpea (fodder) cropping system under
conservation agriculture
Main plot treatments:
Tr Kharif Rabi Summer
T1 CT ( Transplanted) CT CT
T2 CT (Transplanted) ZT ZT
T3 CT (Direct Seeded) CT ZT
T4 ZT (Direct Seeded) ZT + R ZT
T5 ZT (Direct Seeded)+ R ZT + R ZT+R
Sub plot treatments:
Tr Kharif Rabi Summer
Recommended
herbicide
Pyrazosulfuron 0.02 kg/ha
fb penoxsulam 0.025 kg/ha
PoE
Clodinofop 0.06
kg/ha+ metsulfuron
0.004 kg/ha PoE
Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha
IWM (Integrated Weed
Management) Oxadiargrl 80 g/ha PE fb
HW at 25 DAT/S
Clodinofop 0.06 kg/ha
+ metsulfuron 0.004
kg/ha PoE fb HW at
40 DAS
Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha +
HW at 20 DAS
Unweeded Weedy check Weedy check Weedy check
Study Period: Kharif, Rabi and summer season of 2020-21 and 2021-22. Design : Split plot
Size: 12m X 4m; Replication:3
Observations: as given under WP 1.2
34
CCSHAU, Hisar
OLD
WP 1.2.1.1.5 Weed management in conservation agriculture systems in rice-wheat cropping system
Objectives:
To monitor weed dynamics, crop productivity and herbicide residues under long-term tillage and
residue management practices under CA.
To evaluate the effect on crop productivity and resource use efficiency
Treatments:
A. Tillage and residue management (main plot)
Treatment Kharif (Rice) Rabi (Wheat) Green manuring
1 CT (Transplanted) CT ZT green gram
2 CT (Transplanted) ZT wheat without residues ZT green gram
3 CT (Transplanted) ZT wheat(Happy seeder sown) with
partial residues (3 t/ha)
ZT green gram
4 CT (Transplanted) ZT wheat (Happy seeder sown) with
full residue
Load ( Give in t/ha quantify???)
ZT green gram
5 CT (Transplanted) ZT wheat (Happy seeder sown) with
full residue load Give in t/ha
quantify???) + microbial consortia/
waste decomposer
ZT green gram
B. Weed management (sub plot)
Kharif
1. Recommended herbicides – Pretilachlor 1000 g/ha, PRE 2. Integrated weed management – Pretilachlor 1000 g/ha, PRE + One HW at 40 DAS 3. Weedy check – (One HW weeding at 60 DAT after taking weed observation)
Rabi
1. Recommended herbicides – Mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron (RM) 14.4 g/ha, 35 DAS 2. Integrated Weed Management - Mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron (RM) 14.4 g/ha, 35 DAS + One HW
at 60 DAS
3. Weedy check – (One hand weeding after the critical period of crop-weed competition 60 DAS)
Design: Strip plot Replications: 3
Observations: as given under WP 1.2
Pantnagar
OLD
WP 1.2.1.1.6 Weed management in rice-wheat-Sesbania cropping system under conservation
agriculture
Objective: To monitor weed dynamics, crop productivity under long-term tillage and residue management
practices.
To evaluate the effect on crop productivity and resource-use efficiency.
35
To study changes in physico-chemical properties of soil.
Treatments:
Main Plot -Tillage and residue management
Kharif (Rice) Rabi (Wheat) Summer
M1 Transplanted rice Conventional wheat Fallow
M2 Transplanted rice + residue Inc. 6 t/ha Conventional wheat +residue Inc. 7
t/ha
Sesbania
(GM)
M3 Transplanted rice + residue Inc. 6 t/ha Zero tillage wheat + residue
retention 7 t/ha
Sesbania
(GM)
M4. Direct-seeded rice Conventional wheat Fallow
M5. Direct-seeded rice + residue Inc. 6 t/ha Conventional wheat +residue
retention 7 t/ha
Sesbania
(GM)
M6. Direct-seeded rice + residue Inc. 6 t/ha Zero tillage wheat +residue
retention 7 t/ha
Sesbania
(GM)
Sub Plot- Weed management
W1 Penoxsulam1w/w + cyhalofop –butyl w/w
OD 135 g./ha (15-20 DAS/DAT)
Clodinafop -propargyl + metsulfuron- methyl
+4g/ha as post-emergence.
W2
IWM-Penoxsulam + cyhalofop –butyl 135
g/ha (15-20 DAS/DAT) fb one hand weeding
at 45 DAS/DAT)
IWM-Clodinafop -propargyl + metsulfuron-
methyl 60+4 g/ha as post-emergence fb One hand
weeding at 60 DAS)
W3 One hand weeding after 60 DAS One hand weeding after 60 DAS
Design: Split Plot Design Replications: 3 Main plot size: 36m x 4m
Note: Method of establishment ZT/CT need to be mentioned
Observations: as given under WP 1.2
Ludhiana
WP 1.2.1.1.7 Weed management in rice-wheat cropping system under conservation agriculture
Objectives: • To monitor weed dynamics, crop productivity, resource use efficiency and herbicide residues
under long-term tillage and residue management practices
• To study C-sequestration and changes in physico-chemical and biological properties of soil
Treatments:
A. Crop establishment, tillage and residue management S.No. Rice Wheat Green manure
1 Conventional tillage
(CT)- Puddled
transplanted rice (PTR)
CT wheat (rice residue removed) -
2 CT-PTR CT wheat (rice residue incorporated ZT+R Green manure
3 CT-PTR ZT wheat (rice residue retention on surface
-sowing with Happy seeder)
ZT+R Green manure
4 CT-Direct seeded rice ZT wheat (rice residue retention on
surface-sowing with Happy seeder)
ZT+ R Green manure
B. Weed management 1. Unweeded check (One hand weeding may be done after the critical period of crop-weed
competition i.e. between 45- 60 days after sowing)
2. Recommend herbicides (Rice: Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence followed by bispyribac-sodium 25 g/ fenoxaprop 67.5 g/ chlorimuron + metsulfuron 4 g/ha depending on
weed flora present in the field; Wheat: Clodinafop + metribuzin 275 g/ha as post-emergence.
36
3. IWM (Recommended herbicides followed by hand weeding)
Design: Split-plot ; Main plot- 30m x4.5m; Sub plot- 10m x 4.5m; Replications: 3
Observations: as given under WP 1.2
Kalyani
OLD
WP 1.2.1.1.8 Weed management in rice-rapeseed-green gram cropping system under conservation
agriculture
Objectives: • To monitor weed dynamics, crop productivity, resource use efficiency and herbicide residues under
long-term tillage and residue management practices
• To study C-sequestration and changes in physico-chemical and biological properties of soil
Treatments
A. Tillage and residue management (main plot)
CT- Conventional tillage (3-4 cultivation followed by planking)
MT- Minimum tillage (Use of 1 pass rotovator)
R- Residue of previous crop retained in-situ on soil surface
Design of experiment: Split plot Replication: 3Plot size: 5m x 4m
Observations: as given under WP 1.2
WP 1.2.2.2 Maize based cropping system
Bengaluru
OLD
WP 1.2.2.2.1 Weed management in maize based cropping system in conservation agriculture
[Kharif-(Maize)- Rabi- (greengram)- Summer – maize)
Objectives:
To monitor weed dynamics, crop productivity and herbicide residues under long-term tillage and residue management practices
To evaluate the effect on crop productivity and resource-use efficiency
Treatment Kharif (rice) Rabi (rapeseed) Summer ( greengram)
Main plot: (Tillage and residue management)
1 CT (Transplanted) CT + R CT
2 CT (Transplanted) MT MT
3 CT (Direct -seeded) CT + R MT
4 MT (Direct -seeded) MT MT
5 MT(Direct -seeded) + R MT + R MT + R
Sub plot: Weed management
1 Pretilachlor 0.75 kg/ha PRE followed by
bispyribac-Na 25 g/ha at 25 DAT
Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha PRE Quizalofop-ethyl 50 g/ha at
20 DAS
2 Pretilachlor 0.75 kg/ha PRE followed by
bispyribac-Na 25 g/ha at 25 DAT fb
mechanical weeding at 50 DAT
Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha PRE
fb mechanical weeding at 30
DAT
Quizalofop-ethyl 50 g/ha at
20 DAS fb mechanical
weeding at 30 DAT
3 One hand weeding at 30 DAT One hand weeding at 30 DAT One hand weeding at 30
DAT
37
To study C-sequestration and changes in physico-chemical and biological properties of soil
Treatment details: A. Main Plot Treatments - Tillage and Residue management
Treatment Kharif ( Maize) Rabi –(Greengram) Summer ( Maize)
T1 Conventional Tillage
*(CT)
Conventional Tillage ( CT) +
Maize residue
Fallow
T2 *Zero Tillage (ZT) Zero Tillage (ZT) + Maize
residue
Zero Tillage + GG residue
T3 *Minimum Tillage (MT) Minimum Tillage (MT) +
Maize residue
Minimum Tillage + GG
residue
T4 Zero Tillage(ZT) +
Maize residues
Minimum Tillage + Maize
Residue
Minimum Tillage + GG
residue
T5 *Permanent Bed (PB) Permanent Bed (PB)+ Maize
residue
Permanent Bed (PB)+ GG
residue
Initially the field is deep tilled (to 30 cm depth) using plough to break the hard pan below the plough layer
before stat of experiment
*CT – Conventional tillage –involved one ploughing each with disc harrow followed by rotavator.
*ZT –No tillage, soil and the surface residues are minimally disturbed, opening a slice for placing seed /
fertilizer leaves inter-row areas undisturbed except for the opening of a narrow (2-3 cm wide) strip or
small hole in the ground for seed placement to ensure adequate seed/soil contact.
*R – Crop residues – all residues produced to be retained in situ on soil surface.
*MT- A broad plough is used to disrupt the top layer of soil only few centimetres or single ploughing
prior to sowing followed by strip-tilling rows with hand-held hoes to sow maize seed. if the soil to be
intact and non penetrate.
*PB- In bed planting wide beds with furrow are prepared where the maize seeds are precisely placed at
required depth 3-4 cm. After preparing the fresh beds during first year these can keep as permanent beds
for subsequent year with keeping crop residue and reshape if required after harvest of the crop. One line
of maize on each bed is desirable when sole crop of maize is planted keeping seed to seed spacing at 30
cm.
Weed management practices (Sub Plot)
Design: Split plot Design;
Plot size: 15 m x 3.6 m
Replication: Three
Location: MRS, Hebbal
Observations: as given under WP 1.2
IWM Kharif ( Maize) Rabi ( GG) Summer ( Maize)
W1-
Recommended
herbicides
Recommended herbicide-
Pendimethalin (750 g/ha (PE) +
fb tembotrione 120 g/ha
Recommended herbicide-
Pendimethalin (750 g/ha) (PE)
fb imazethapyr 10SL at 75
g/ha at 25 DAS POE
Recommended herbicide-
Pendimethalin (750 g/ha
(PE) + fb
tembotrione 120 g/ha
W2- Integrated
weed Mgt.
(herbicide +
mechanical
weeding)
IWM – Atrazine 1.25 kg/ha PE
+ HW at 30 DAS
IWM – Pendimethalin (750
g/ha (PE) fb Hand weeding at
30 DAS
IWM – Atrazine 1.25 kg/ha
PE + HW at 30DAS
W3- One Hand
weeding
One weeding after taking
observation at 60 DAS
One weeding after taking
observation at 45 DAS
One weeding after taking
observation at 60 DAS
38
Udaipur
WP 1.2.2.2.2 Development of sustainable weed management strategies in diversified cropping
systems
(i) Maize - wheat cropping system
Objectives:
To monitor weed dynamics, crop productivity and herbicide residues under long-term tillage and residue management practices
To evaluate the effect on crop productivity and resource-use efficiency
To study C-sequestration, and changes in physico-chemical and biological properties of soil
A. Tillage and residue management (main plot)
Treatments Kharif (Maize) Rabi (Wheat) *Summer (Green manuring)
1 CT CT CT
2 CT ZT ZT
3 ZT ZT ZT
4 ZT + R ZT ZT + R
5 ZT + R ZT + R ZT + R
Weed management (Sub-plot)
Maize
1. Atrazine 0.50 kg/ha + tembotrione- 120 g/ha PoE a