Upload
reece-bruce
View
38
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Alignment of Flexible Molecular Structures. Motivation. Proteins are flexible. One would like to align proteins modulo the flexibility. Hinge and sh ear protein domain motions (Gerstein, Lesk , Chotia). Conformational flexibility in drugs. Problem definition. Flexible Geometric Hashing. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Alignment of Flexible Molecular Structures
Motivation
Proteins are flexible. One would like to align proteins modulo the flexibility.
Hinge and shear protein domain motions (Gerstein, Lesk , Chotia).
Conformational flexibility in drugs.
Problem definition
Flexible Geometric Hashing
Exploit the fact that neighboring parts share the joint - accumulate mutual information at the joint.
Achieve complexity of the same order of magnitude as in rigid alignment.
Flexible protein alignment without prior hinge knowledge
FlexProt - algorithm
detects automatically flexibility regions,
exploits amino acid sequence order.
Motivation
Geometric Representation
3-D Curve{vi}, i=1…n
Experimental Results
Experimental Results
FlexProt Algorithm
Input: two protein molecules A and B, each two protein molecules A and B, each being represented by the sequence of the being represented by the sequence of the 3-D coordinates of its 3-D coordinates of its CC atoms.atoms.
Task: largest flexible alignment by largest flexible alignment by decomposing the two molecules into a decomposing the two molecules into a minimalminimal number of rigid fragment pairs number of rigid fragment pairs having similar 3-D structure.having similar 3-D structure.
Detection of Congruent Detection of Congruent Rigid Fragment PairsRigid Fragment Pairs
Joining Rigid Joining Rigid Fragment PairsFragment Pairs
Rigid Rigid Structural ComparisonStructural Comparison
ClusteringClustering(removing ins/dels)(removing ins/dels)
FlexProt Main Steps
Structural Similarity Matrix
Congruent Rigid Fragment Pair
j
i+1
j+1
i
j-1
i-1
vi-1 vi vi+1
wj-1 wj wj+1
Fragkt(l) = vk … vi ... vk+l-1
wt … wj … wt+l-1
RMSD (Fragkt(l) ) <
Detection of Congruent Rigid Fragment Pairs
k
t
k+l-1
t+l-1
RMSD Computation
VVii …...…... VVi+li+l
WWjj ...…...… WWj+lj+l
VVkk …...…... VVk+mk+m
WWtt ...…...… WWt+mt+mPP== Q=Q=
P U Q
RMSD( P U Q ) in O(1) time
NOT O( |P|+|Q| )
RMSD( P )RMSD( P )
RMSD( Q )RMSD( Q )
Detection of Congruent Detection of Congruent Rigid Fragment PairsRigid Fragment Pairs
Joining Rigid Joining Rigid Fragment PairsFragment Pairs
Rigid Rigid Structural ComparisonStructural Comparison
ClusteringClustering(removing ins/dels)(removing ins/dels)
FlexProt Main Steps
How to Join Rigid Fragment Pairs?
Graph Representation
Graph NodeGraph Node
Graph EdgeGraph Edge
Graph Representation •The fragments are in ascending order.The fragments are in ascending order.
•The gaps (ins/dels) are limited.The gaps (ins/dels) are limited.
•Allow some overlapping.Allow some overlapping.
W
+ Size of the rigid fragment pair (node b)
- Gaps (ins/dels)
- OverlappingPenalties
a b
Graph Representation
W_i
W_k
W_t
W_m
W_n
• DAG DAG (directed acyclic graph)(directed acyclic graph)
Optimal Solution?
•““All Shortest Paths” All Shortest Paths” O(|E|O(|E|**|V|+|V||V|+|V|22) (for DAG) ) (for DAG)
W_i
W_k
W_t
W_m
W_n
•““Single-source shortest paths”Single-source shortest paths” O(|E|+|V|) O(|E|+|V|)
Detection of Congruent Detection of Congruent Rigid Fragment PairsRigid Fragment Pairs
Joining Rigid Joining Rigid Fragment PairsFragment Pairs
Rigid Rigid Structural ComparisonStructural Comparison
ClusteringClustering(removing ins/dels)(removing ins/dels)
FlexProt Main Steps
Clustering (removing ins/dels)
T1
T2
If joining two fragment pairs gives small RMSD (T1 ~ T2) then put them into one cluster.
Detection of Congruent Detection of Congruent Rigid Fragment PairsRigid Fragment Pairs
Joining Rigid Joining Rigid Fragment PairsFragment Pairs
Rigid Rigid Structural ComparisonStructural Comparison
ClusteringClustering(removing ins/dels)(removing ins/dels)
FlexProt Main Steps
Correspondence Problem
Molecular Surface Representation
Applications to docking
Motivation
Prediction of biomolecular recognition.
Detection of drug binding ‘cavities’.
Molecular Graphics.
1. Solvent Accessible Surface – SAS2. Connolly Surface
Connolly’s MS algorithm
A ‘water’ probe ball (1.4-1.8 A diameter) is rolled over the van der Waals surface.
Smoothes the surface and bridges narrow ‘inaccessible’ crevices.
Connolly’s MS algorithm - cont.
Convex, concave and saddle patches according to the no. of contact points between the surface atoms and the probe ball.
Outputs points+normals according to the
required sampling density (e.g. 10 pts/A2).
Example - the surface of crambin
Critical points based on Connolly rep. (Lin, Wolfson, Nussinov)
Define a single point+normal for each patch.
Convex-caps, concave-pits, saddle - belt.
Critical point definition
Connolly => Shou Lin
Solid Angle local extrema
knob
hole
Chymotrypsin surface colored by solid angle (yellow-convex, blue-concave)