31
From Start to Pilot: Comprehensive Redesign of a Questionnaire Measuring Foreign Direct Investment Alfred D. Tuttle Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler United States Bureau of Economic Analysis

Alfred D. Tuttle Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

  • Upload
    haruko

  • View
    31

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

From Start to Pilot: Comprehensive Redesign of a Questionnaire Measuring Foreign Direct Investment. Alfred D. Tuttle Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler United States Bureau of Economic Analysis. Overview – Redesign of BEA Form BE-605. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

From Start to Pilot: Comprehensive Redesign of a

Questionnaire Measuring Foreign Direct Investment

Alfred D. Tuttle

Rebecca L. Morrison

United States Census Bureau

David H. Galler

United States Bureau of

Economic Analysis

Page 2: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

2

Overview – Redesign of BEA Form BE-605

• Reimbursable project with BEA

• Multiple, intensive stages of research, design, testing, revision

• Qualitative and quantitative evaluations

• New BE-605 form mailed out in March 2007

Page 3: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

3

Outline

• Background – BEA Form BE-605

• Summary of stages of research

• Findings

• Next steps

Page 4: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

4

Background

• BE-605 (quarterly) and BE-15 (annual)

• Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) – >10% of voting rights in an incorporated entity (or equivalent interest in unincorporated entity)

• Sample – foreign-owned businesses in US

Page 5: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

5

Research stages and methods

• Background investigations– Expert review of form– Focus groups with survey analysts– Observations of callbacks– Respondent debriefings

Page 6: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

6

Research stages and methods

• Cognitive testing of mockups

Page 7: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

7

Research stages and methods

• Pilot test – Respondent debriefings – Evaluation questions

Page 8: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

8

Findings from background research

Data collection and design issues:

• Dense formatting

• Economic accounting concepts differ from US GAAP

• Separate instructions

Page 9: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

9

Recommendations

• Formatting recommendations– Letter size pages (not legal)– More “open” visual design– Incorporate instructions into form:

• within questions• adjacent to questions on facing page• key instructions become questions

– Diagrams to augment questions

Page 10: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

10

Original form

Page 11: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

11

Recommendation: More “open” design

Page 12: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

12

Recommendation: Embedded instructions

Page 13: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

13

Recommendation: Adjacent instructions

Page 14: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

14

Recommendations: Questions from instructions, and diagrams

Page 15: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

15

Cognitive testing

• Problematic sections mocked-up and tested (not entire forms)

• 5 rounds of cognitive interviews

• Iterative process: – mock-ups revised between rounds – design features modified & re-tested

Page 16: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

16

Findings from cognitive testing

• New design features were effective:– Majority of respondents liked the more

open format – Embedded instructions would likely

improve data quality– Some “InstructionsQuestions” and

diagrams required extensive modification, though most did not

Page 17: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

17

Developing 605 pilot

• Redesigned entire BE-605 form

• Close collaboration with BEA survey staff

Page 18: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

18

Pilot test

• Mailed 2nd quarter 2006

• Sent to sub-sample (n = 653; survey sample ~4,000)

• Completing pilot form optional

• Response rate: 53% (350 returned forms) during initial 8-week processing period

Page 19: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

19

Pilot form evaluation

• Respondent debriefings

• Evaluation questions in form

Page 20: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

20

Findings – R debriefings

• Favorable impressions of new form:– More pleasing to the eye– White reporting spaces easier to see

against colored background – Larger font, bold text, more space– Letter size pages easier to handle– Diagrams were helpful– Embedded instructions helpful

Page 21: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

21

Findings – R debriefings

• Drawbacks:– More pages– Booklet format makes it harder to fax– Took longer to complete than original form

(disruption of reporting routine)

Page 22: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

22

Limitations

• Stymied by experienced Rs, reporting routines…

• …though even experienced Rs were helped by new formatting and instructions.

Page 23: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

23

Findings – Evaluation questions

• Four questions appended to survey

• Each item received between 279 and 290 responses

Page 24: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

24

Findings – Evaluation questions

Instruction placement?

79.3% - Near questions

18.3% - In separate booklet

2.4% - Not applicable – I haven’t completed

the usual BE-605

Page 25: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

25

Findings – Evaluation questions

Open space and number of pages?

48.7% - less open space, fewer pages

47% - more open space, more pages

4.3% - Not applicable – I haven’t completed the usual BE-605

Page 26: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

26

Findings – Evaluation questions

Use of diagrams?

65.4% - very helpful or somewhat helpful

11.7% - only a little helpful

18% - did not need them

3.9% - confusing

Page 27: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

27

Findings – Evaluation questions

Easy/difficult compared to usual form?

50.5% - harder

42.5% - easier

7% - Not applicable – I haven’t completed the usual BE-605

Page 28: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

28

Findings – Evaluation questions

• Instructions preferred near questions

• Organization charts helpful

• Easier or more difficult?

• Preference for more/fewer pages?

Page 29: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

29

Summary

• Redesigned BE-605 went into production in March 2007– Recommended analysis of edit checks

during form processing

Page 30: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

30

Summary

• Multi-method approach to comprehensive survey redevelopment

Page 31: Alfred D. Tuttle  Rebecca L. Morrison United States Census Bureau David H. Galler

31

Thanks!

Alfred D. [email protected]

Rebecca L. [email protected]

David [email protected]