Upload
rachel-delilah-stevenson
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PEER-TO-PEER GROUP
MENTORING
FOR TRANSITIONING
STUDENT-VETERANS
HISTORICAL FRAMEWORK
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
CURRENT ISSUE
PROPOSED INTERVENTIONAl
ert V
eter
an s
tude
nts
prod
sto
dgy
prof
esso
rs.
(194
7). J
ourn
al o
f Edu
catio
n, 1
30, 3
1.
Bann
ier,
B. (2
006)
. The
impa
ct o
f the
GI B
ill o
n de
velo
pmen
tal e
duca
tion.
The
Lea
rnin
g As
sist
ance
Rev
iew
, 11,
35-
44.
Cohe
n, J.
, War
ner,
R. L
., &
Seg
al, D
. R. (
1995
). M
ilita
ry s
ervi
ces
and
educ
ation
al
attai
nmen
t in
the
all-v
olun
teer
forc
e.
Soci
al S
cien
ce Q
uart
erly
, 76,
88-
104.
DiR
amio
, D.,
Acke
rman
, R.,
& M
itche
ll, R
. L.
(200
8). F
rom
com
bat t
o ca
mpu
s: V
oice
s of
st
uden
t-vet
eran
s. N
ASPA
Jour
nal,
45, 7
3-10
2.
Feld
man
, S. F
. (19
74).
Geo
grap
hy c
ontr
ols
GI B
ill
oppo
rtun
ities
(Sta
ff Re
port
). W
ashi
ngto
n,
DC:
Nati
onal
Lea
gue
of C
ities
and
Uni
ted
Stat
es C
onfe
renc
e of
May
ors.
Roac
h, R
. (19
97).
From
com
bat t
o ca
mpu
s.
Blac
k Is
sues
in H
ighe
r Edu
catio
n, 1
4(13
), 26
.Ru
man
n, C
. B.,
& H
amric
k, F.
A. (
2009
). Su
ppor
ting
stud
ent v
eter
ans
in tr
ansi
tion.
N
ew D
irecti
ons
for S
tude
nt S
ervi
ces,
126
, 25
-34.
Ry
an, S
. W.,
Carls
trom
, A. H
., H
ughe
y, K
. F.,
&
Har
ris, B
. S. (
2011
). Fr
om b
oots
to b
ooks
: Ap
plyi
ng S
chlo
ssbe
rg’s
mod
el to
tr
ansi
tioni
ng A
mer
ican
vet
eran
s. N
ACAD
A Jo
urna
l, 31
, 55-
63.
U.S
. Dep
artm
ent o
f Edu
catio
n, N
ation
al C
ente
r fo
r Edu
catio
n St
atisti
cs. (
2011
). St
ats
in
brie
f: M
ilita
ry s
ervi
ce m
embe
rs a
nd
vete
rans
(NPS
AS:0
8).
Wils
on, R
. (19
95).
The
G.I.
Bill
and
the
tran
sfor
mati
on o
f Am
eric
a. N
ation
al
Foru
m, 7
5(4)
, 20.
Refe
renc
es
Post-WWII Era
Alert Veteran Students Prod Stodgy Professors “Exceeding pre-war records by 50%, 2,062,000 men and women are now crowding America’s colleges to the bursting point. With individual institutions showing increases of from 10 to 500%, educators are finding that lack of space is not their only problem. One college official viewed the influx of 1,073,000 ex-servicemen into the nation’s classrooms as stimulating, if not always comfortable. ‘The performance of teachers is being challenged for the first time by their students,’ he said, citing the case of a Western Reserve student-veteran who told a professor his lecture was ‘the stupidest I’ve ever heard.’ ‘Teachers have had to throw their old lecture notes out of the window,’ said M. B. Toler, mathematics department head at Fenn College. ‘We’ve had to acquire a whole new body of knowledge to keep apace of the widely traveled and experienced GI’” (Alert Veteran Students Prod Stodgy Professors, 1947).
Late 20th Century
Vietnam Era & All-Volunteer Force Veterans on Campus
• Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) was an enlistment incentive for Vietnam and post-Vietnam Era veterans (Bannier, 2006)
• Inferior to previous incarnations of the GI Bill (Bannier, 2006)
• Required contributions to the plan with federal government matches at a rate of two to one (Bannier, 2006)
• Veterans believed they were unwelcome on campuses during this era & consequently were more likely to try to ‘blend in’ to civilian college life (Rumann & Hamrick, 2009)
Schlossberg’s Transition Model
• Transition = “any event, or non event, that results in changed relationships, routines, assumptions, and roles” (as cited in Ryan, Carlstrom, Hughey, & Harris, 2011, p. 56)
• Four factors will influence the quality of any transition: the self, the situation, the support, and the strategies utilized, otherwise known as the 4 Ss (as cited in Ryan et al., 2011)
• This model will give a framework for working with Student-Veterans transitioning from active duty military to college, including perceptions of the cultures of college and military life (self), perceived negative or positive reasons for leaving the military (related to the situation), family and connection to others (support), and techniques for navigating through the academic bureaucracy (strategies), among a multitude of other factors (Ryan et al., 2011)
Schlossberg, Lynch, and Chickering’s Transition Framework
• Identified the “Moving In, Moving Through, Moving Out” structure of transitions (as cited in DiRamio, Ackerman, & Mitchell, 2008)
• Structure is a useful way of evaluating transitions over time by separating stressors into these headings
• Research (DiRamio et al., 2008) shows that student-veterans identify six factors associated with “Moving In” to college: “connecting with peers, blending in, faculty, campus veteran’s office, finances, students with disabilities, mental health and PTSD” (p. 80)
DiRamio, Ackerman, and Mitchell’s Results (2008)
Percentage distribution of undergraduates and graduate students, by military status and receipt of GI Bill education benefits: 2007–08
Undergraduates Graduate students
Military status and receipt of benefits
Percent Number Percent Number
Total in U.S. 100.0 20,928,000 100.0 3,456,000
Military students
Veterans 3.1 657,000 3.1 107,000
Active duty 0.7 139,000 0.8 29,000
Reserves 0.4 76,000 0.2 9,000
Nonmilitary students 95.8 20,055,000 95.8 3,312,000
Among military students
Received GI Bill education benefits for2007–08 academic year
37.7 329,000 20.5 29,000
Did not receive GI Bill education benefits for 2007–08 academic year
62.3 543,000 79.5 115,000
(U.S. Department of Education, 2011)
• New cohort of Student-Veterans is likely to increase in size as troops draw down in Iraq and Afghanistan (Ryan et al., 2011)
• New “Post 9/11” GI Bill includes increased educational benefits (Ryan et al., 2011)
• Student-Veterans of this era may have difficulties distinct from other eras (Ryan et al., 2011; DiRamio et al., 2008)
• Current Student-Veterans are a population worthy of student affairs professionals’ consideration in developing specific programming that can help them to transition out of combat and into college
• My program addresses the transitioning difficulties of Student-Veterans new to college campuses and would work best at an institution similar to Oregon State University
Peer-to-Peer Group Mentoring Program
• New Student-Veterans are identified during the college application process and informed that another orientation program is available to them; they must opt-in to the program
• Student-Veterans who have been on campus for at least one year are trained by a staff member to facilitate mentor groups of clusters of 5 to 8 new Student-Veterans and are supervised by a staff member throughout the program
• New Student-Veterans elect to participate in this extended orientation that continues through the first term of their college experience
• Mentor Groups meet once a week for an hour over the course of the term, with the trained Student-Veteran facilitator, to discuss transitioning issues, such as financial, relationship, academic, cultural, and mental health difficulties
• Student-Veteran facilitator will be well versed in resources available to his mentees and able to refer them to student affairs offices such as DAS and counseling
• Session topics may include in-depth discussion of college support services, challenges of the transition out of combat, culture shock, personal stories of military service, and overviews of the warning signs associated with PTSD, enabling Student-Veterans to look for those signs in others and in themselves
• At the end of the term, new Student-Veterans can elect to continue to meet periodically with their mentor one-on-one to check up and follow through the first year
Program Goals• To empower Student-Veterans by offering extensive
knowledge of the support services available to them• To create an instant peer group of other Student-
Veterans who share a common culture• To offer a role model and confidant in the Peer Mentor• To assist Student-Veterans in “Moving In” to college• To give the Peer Mentor a valuable leadership and
service experience in mentoring fellow Student-Veterans• To act as an early warning system for Student-Veterans
who are having particular difficulties with their physical, mental, or emotional health or with navigating the “red tape” of the college campus
Student Affairs Competencies Required to Facilitate
this Program
• Multicultural Competence• Staffing and Supervision• Teaching in the Co-Curriculum• Advising and Consultation• Community Development• Academic and Student Affairs Partnerships
JESSICA BARON