Upload
abril
View
38
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Developing the Asian bond markets Shanghai, 25-26 September 2007 Minimizing Foreign Exchange Settlement Risk in the ASEAN+3 Region. Alan Taylor, ADB Consultant 25 September 2007. Topics. 1. Objectives and Progress. 2. FX Settlements in Asia. 3. Proposed settlement infrastructure. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Developing the Asian bond markets Shanghai, 25-26 September 2007
Minimizing Foreign Exchange Settlement Risk in the ASEAN+3 Region
Alan Taylor, ADB Consultant 25 September 2007
2
Topics
3. Proposed settlement infrastructure
2. FX Settlements in Asia
1. Objectives and Progress
5. Proposals for further work
4. Feedback from the settlement conference
3
Topics
3. Proposed settlement infrastructure
2. FX Settlements in Asia
1. Objectives and Progress
5. Proposals for further work
4. Feedback from the settlement conference
4
Objectives of Study
Overall ABMI (Asian Bond Market Initiative) objectives• Development of local currency bond markets
– Alternative to bank and equity finance– Avoidance of maturity and currency mismatch– Deepening of liquidity, yield curve etc
Project objectives• Risk reduction in clearing and settlement• Removing the barriers to cross-border bond investment• Does Asia need a regional settlement intermediary
(RSI)?
5
Progress-to-DateInitial research:• Analysis of settlement risks, drawing on earlier studies • Market consultations May-August 2006
– Asia, Europe, US– Central banks, custodians, depositories, asset managers etc
Interim report:
• Market survey December 2006 - January 2007– financial institutions throughout ASEAN+3– 76 responses
• Development of further RSI Options• Asia Bond Clearing and Settlement Conference, April 2007
– Further feedback from attendees• Follow-on consultations with private sector
Final report:
6
ASEAN+3 bond markets size & growthUSD bn
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
27% average annual growth 2004 - 20062004
2006
7
Market survey / settlement risk (Q5)
0 20 40 60 80 100
Very concerned
Moderately concerned
Slightly concerned
Not concerned
57% are very / moderately concerned
"…concerned about the systemic risk given the high growth prospects of Asian bond markets" Central bank"…settlement and pre-settlement risks" Local custodian bank"…need to reduce principal risk and replacement cost risk, but cross-border investment in ASEAN+3 is small" Central bank
To what extent are you concerned about foreign exchange settlement risk for cross border bond transactions in ASEAN+3?
8
Market survey / settlement risk (Q6)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Big benefit
Moderate benefit
Slight benefit
No benefit
72% see big / moderate benefit
To what extent will it benefit your business if you can make payments and securities settlements in the same Asian time zone?
"…great benefit of reducing settlement risks. Ideally, PvP and DvP facilities should be introduced" Central bank"…free up credit line, maximize cash flow usage" Commercial bank"…cross-border transactions in Asian time zone will be stimulated" CSD
9
Topics
3. Proposed settlement infrastructure
2. FX Settlements in Asia
1. Objectives and Progress
5. Proposals for further work
4. Feedback from the settlement conference
10
FX settlements in ASEAN+3
1. Using correspondent banks
2. Using CLS Bank
3. Using local payment vs payment systems
FX settlement risk is borne by the banks, but the cost is passed on to the end investor
11
• Risk of counterparty default ('Herstatt risk')– AFTER paying currency A, and BEFORE receiving currency B– The exposure lasts from the time the payment instruction for
the currency sold becomes irrevocable until the time the receipt of currency purchased is confirmed.
FX settlement (1) using correspondent banks
Duration of Exposure
Source: “Settlement Risk in FX transactions", CPSS report, BIS (1996).
FX settlement 1: Correspondent banks
12
FX settlement 2: CLS Bank
• Assured payment vs payment– Established 2002– 15 eligible currencies– Owned by 72 member banks
• Benefits– Elimination of settlement risk– Operational efficiency
• Limitations– Only 4 Asian currencies eligible– Expensive to become a member– Settlement is late afternoon /evening Asian time
13
FX settlement 3: Local PvP systems
• Settlement of USD vs local currency– Payment vs payment– In local Asian time zone– Local currency settles via local RTGS, central bank money– USD settles via appointed settlement bank
• Existing systems– Hong Kong (HKD vs USD) – Hong Kong (HKD vs EUR)– Malaysia (MYR vs USD)– Philippines (PHP vs USD)
• Limitations– Participants must be local banks– Dependence on a single provider– Potential risk on commercial bank
Bank A
HKDRTGS
Bank B
USDRTGS
HKD RTGS USD RTGS
Bank B Bank A
HKMA HSBC
Payment flow Message flow
HKDCCPMP
USDCCPMP
Matching
14
Third Time Zone Problem
BRUSSELS
10/1 10/2 10/3
(time) 0 9 16 0 9 16 0 9 16 0
SEOUL
10/1 10/2 10/3
(time) 8 9 16 17 0 8 9 16 17 0 8 9 16 17 0
Investors in Asia must deposit money or securities a day before the settlement date
ICSDs & global custodians provides batch processing & intra-day line of credit
Investors bear the opportunity cost of losing liquidity for a day
8 hours of time difference Europe and Asia…
15
Topics
3. Proposed settlement infrastructure
2. FX Settlements in Asia
1. Objectives and Progress
5. Proposals for further work
4. Feedback from the settlement conference
16
What are the options?
• Option 1: Maintain the status quo
• Option 2: Set up a Regional Settlement Intermediary
17
Option 1: Status Quo
• = leave evolution to local initiatives and market forces
• Arguments for:– Market based solution– Existing global custodians are well capitalized and
regulated– Current low volumes in region
• Arguments against:– Existing settlement infrastructure focused on US /
Europe– Dependence on a few providers– Region should design its own infrastructure
18
Option 2: Regional Settlement Intermediary(summary of options)
• Option 2.1: Asian ICSD– Model A = Using Local Custodians– Model B = Direct Link to Local Settlement Systems– Model C = Direct Link to Local Settlement Systems & CLS Bank
• Option 2.2: Pan-Asian CSD• Option 2.3: Asian Payments Bank
All are aimed at reducing settlement risk and cost, harmonizing infrastructure, regional ownership of regional utilities
19
2.1 Asian ICSD
• Custody and settlement– 3 business lines
• ASEAN+3 investors investing in other ASEAN+3 bond markets• ASEAN+3 investors investing in US/European bond markets• US/European investors investing in ASEAN+3 bond markets
– US$ bonds issued by Asian governments can be 'seed' business• Direct users
– Banks and securities dealers• Bridge to both European ICSDs
– Book entry settlement, securities vs cash• Settlement geared to Asian time
– 3 possible mechanisms (described in Final Report): Model A; Using local custodiansModel B; Using direct links to local paymentsModel C; Direct links + special link to CLS
• Scope: only for bonds, or for equities too?
20
Option 2.1: Asian ICSD
Asian ICSD
CSDSingapore
CustodianBank
SecuritiesDealer
Euroclear /Clearstream
CSDChina
CustodianBank
SecuritiesDealer
Investor
DvP settlement bridge
Investor
etcCSDIndonesia
Settlement links(direct or via local custodians)
21
2.2 Pan-Asian CSD
• Depository for all debt securities issued in ASEAN+3– Existing national CSDs could be sub-depositories– Possible model: Euroclear Single Settlement Engine in Europe
• Direct users– Banks, securities dealers, possibly institutional investors
• Bridge to European ICSDs?• Link to local payments systems
– Settlement in central bank money
• Scope: only for bonds, or for equities too?
22
Option 2.2: Pan-Asian CSD
Pan-AsianCSD
Bond marketVietnam
Bond marketMalaysia
CustodianBank
SecuritiesDealer
Investor
Bond marketKorea
Bond marketIndonesia
etc
23
2.3 Asian Payments Bank
• Assured payments versus payments– PvP ASEAN+3 currencies vs US$– PvP ASEAN+3 vs ASEAN+3
• Final settlement of US$ in Asian time zone– Mechanism to be discussed - may involve consortium of leading
commercial banks, backed by central bank reserves?– Similar local systems in HK, Malaysia, Philippines - expand to regional
system• Direct users
– Banks• Link to ASEAN+3 local payments systems• Special link to CLS Bank
– Enables PvP with participants of CLS
• Scope - only for bond settlements, or for all FX payments?
24
Option 2.3: Asian Payments Bank
AsianPayments
Bank
Thai baht
Memberbank
Memberbank
CLS Bank
Phil peso
Memberbank
Memberbank
Investor
PvP settlement bridge
PvP Settlement links
Investor
Euro (ECB)USD (Fed)
"Asian time"USD
25
RSI - arguments for
• Reduce risks and costs of cross-border bond and FX settlement
• Single platform for whole region• Consolidated holdings of collateral will
help develop repo and derivatives market• Jump-start the integration of regional
markets• Local ownership of regional infrastructure• Catalyst for change?
26
RSI - arguments against
• Infrastructure is not the main barrier to development of bond markets– Lack of price transparency, lack of yield
curve, currency controls, withholding taxes…
• Current volumes low, can be handled by existing providers
• Is there a business case…?
27
Market survey / Need for an RSI?
(Q7a) Is it necessary to establish an RSI to improve the settlement risk on clearing and settlement of bond transactions?
(Q7b) Is it necessary to establish an RSI to improve the settlement risk on foreign exchange transactions?
Yes76%
No24%
Yes78%
No22%
over ¾ believe it is needed
28
Topics
3. Proposed settlement infrastructure
2. FX Settlements in Asia
1. Objectives and Progress
5. Proposals for further work
4. Feedback from the settlement conference
29
Clearing & Settlement conference (April 07)Summary of outcome
1. Rapid growth of the local bond markets, maturing as an independent asset class
2. Significant recent improvements in infrastructure3. Derivatives markets will also grow so also need
efficient settlement infrastructure4. European changes with Target2 Securities, requires
NCSDs to outsource settlement5. Need a regional not national perspective6. Importance of regional initiatives such as ASEAN+3
ABMI7. Broad study into cross-border settlement barriers is
needed for Asia (similar to 'Giovannini study' for EU)8. Need cost and benefit analysis for RSI
30
Topics
3. Proposed settlement infrastructure
2. FX Settlements in Asia
1. Objectives and Progress
5. Proposals for further work
4. Feedback from the settlement conference
31
GOE ProposalStage 1: Asian 'Giovannini' study
• Mandates: – Identify and prioritize the main barriers
(market practice / regulatory / tax / infrastructure) re cross border settlement
– Propose roadmap to remove the barriers– Estimate the costs (compared to domestic
settlement or US / Europe)
32
Setting up a Group of Experts…
In Europe, a Group of Experts successfully studied a number of EU-wide financial issues - Including cross-border clearing and settlement - Chaired by Dr Alberto Giovannini ("The Giovannini report“ (2001, 2003))
CoordinatingCommittee
Subcommittees
Steering & Monitoring Committee
Representatives from ASEAN+3
countries
Private sector professionals
(voluntary basis)
High-level private sector
professionals
ADB representative
Group of Experts
33
Setting up a Group of Experts
1. Strong and consistent (non-financial) sponsorship by EU government
2. Voluntary participation of private sector3. Advisory group, no policymaking power4. Group members selected on ability, experienced market
professionals5. Hands-on style, all members were assigned work!6. Chairman was an effective spokesman at government level7. TOR were clear but not too restrictive8. Lack of bureaucratic structure
Key message: Can rely on the private sector to provide resources, provided public sectors are supportive.
Success factors in Giovannini Group of Experts for EU:
34
GOE ProposalStage 2: RSI evaluation
• Based on Stage 1 findings
• Mandates: – Evaluate the need for an RSI, and if so…– Investigate the feasibility of the various RSI
options – Determine public and private sector roles– Analyze the business case
35
Further informationFor further information, please contact:
Asian Development Bank:Masato Miyachi, Senior Advisor, [email protected]
Chiemi-Jamie Kaneko, Senior Financial Market Specialist, [email protected]
Consultant Team:Changyong Rhee (Seoul)[email protected]
Alan Taylor (Hong Kong)[email protected]
Mariko Sawada (Tokyo)[email protected]