55
Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Special Note USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service is suspending a number of statistical surveys and reports for the remainder of the fiscal year resulting from reduced funding. Suspended commodity programs impacting the Agricultural Prices report are non-citrus fruit, tree nuts, vegetables, and milk cow replacement prices. Check the NASS website at www.nass.usda.gov for any future updates to these programs September Farm Prices Received Index Declined 4 Points The preliminary All Farm Products Index of Prices Received by Farmers in September, at 185 percent, based on 1990-1992=100, decreased 4 points (2.1 percent) from August. The Crop Index is down 8 points (3.7 percent) and the Livestock Index decreased 1 point (0.6 percent). Producers received lower prices for corn, hogs, and wheat and higher prices for calves, milk, and cattle. In addition to prices, the overall index is also affected by the seasonal change based on a 3-year average mix of commodities producers sell. Increased monthly movement of soybeans, corn, potatoes, and hogs offset the decreased marketing of wheat, cattle, cotton, and broilers. The preliminary All Farm Products Index is down 10 points (5.1 percent) from September 2012. The Food Commodities Index, at 181, is unchanged from last month but decreased 1 point (0.5 percent) from September 2012. Prices Paid Index Down 3 Points The September Index of Prices Paid for Commodities and Services, Interest, Taxes, and Farm Wage Rates (PPITW) is 213 percent of the 1990-1992 average. The index is down 3 points (-1.4 percent) from August and 4 points (-1.8 percent) below September 2012. Lower prices in September for concentrates, nitrogen, feed grains, and mixed fertilizer offset higher prices for feeder cattle, diesel, LP gas, and feeder pigs. Prices Received, Prices Paid, and Ratio of Prices Received to Prices Paid Indexes 1990-1992 Base United States: September 2013 with Comparisons Index September August September 2012 2013 2013 Prices received by farmers ......................................................................... Prices paid by farmers ................................................................................ Ratio of prices received to prices paid ........................................................ 195 217 90 189 216 88 185 213 87

Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices

ISSN: 1937-4216

Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States

Department of Agriculture (USDA).

Special Note

USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service is suspending a number of statistical surveys and reports for the

remainder of the fiscal year resulting from reduced funding. Suspended commodity programs impacting the Agricultural

Prices report are non-citrus fruit, tree nuts, vegetables, and milk cow replacement prices. Check the NASS website at

www.nass.usda.gov for any future updates to these programs

September Farm Prices Received Index Declined 4 Points

The preliminary All Farm Products Index of Prices Received by Farmers in September, at 185 percent, based on

1990-1992=100, decreased 4 points (2.1 percent) from August. The Crop Index is down 8 points (3.7 percent) and the

Livestock Index decreased 1 point (0.6 percent). Producers received lower prices for corn, hogs, and wheat and higher

prices for calves, milk, and cattle. In addition to prices, the overall index is also affected by the seasonal change based on

a 3-year average mix of commodities producers sell. Increased monthly movement of soybeans, corn, potatoes, and hogs

offset the decreased marketing of wheat, cattle, cotton, and broilers.

The preliminary All Farm Products Index is down 10 points (5.1 percent) from September 2012. The Food Commodities

Index, at 181, is unchanged from last month but decreased 1 point (0.5 percent) from September 2012.

Prices Paid Index Down 3 Points

The September Index of Prices Paid for Commodities and Services, Interest, Taxes, and Farm Wage Rates (PPITW) is

213 percent of the 1990-1992 average. The index is down 3 points (-1.4 percent) from August and 4 points (-1.8 percent)

below September 2012. Lower prices in September for concentrates, nitrogen, feed grains, and mixed fertilizer offset

higher prices for feeder cattle, diesel, LP gas, and feeder pigs.

Prices Received, Prices Paid, and Ratio of Prices Received to Prices Paid Indexes 1990-1992 Base – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

Index September August September

2012 2013 2013

Prices received by farmers ......................................................................... Prices paid by farmers ................................................................................ Ratio of prices received to prices paid ........................................................

195

217

90

189

216

88

185

213

87

Page 2: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

2 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Contents

Prices Received by Farmers .................................................................................................................................................... 4

Prices Received Indexes – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ...................................................................... 5

Prices Received and Prices Paid Indexes by Month for Selected Groups – United States: 2012 and 2013,

1990-1992 Base ................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Received Indexes by Month, Livestock Products, All Products, and All Crops –

United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart................................................................................................................................... 6

Received Indexes by Month, Food Grains, Feed Grains & Hay, and Oilseeds –

United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart................................................................................................................................... 6

Received Indexes by Month, Fruit & Nut and Commercial Vegetables –

United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart................................................................................................................................... 7

Received Indexes by Month, Meat Animal, Dairy Products, and Poultry & Eggs –

United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart................................................................................................................................... 7

Prices Received for Field Crops and Fruits – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ......................................... 8

Prices Received for Vegetables and Livestock – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons .................................... 9

Prices Received for Corn by Month – United States Chart ................................................................................................... 10

Prices Received for Wheat by Month – United States Chart ................................................................................................ 10

Prices Received for Cotton by Month – United States Chart ................................................................................................ 11

Prices Received for Soybeans by Month – United States Chart ........................................................................................... 11

Prices Received for Cattle by Month – United States Chart ................................................................................................. 12

Prices Received for Milk by Month – United States Chart ................................................................................................... 12

Prices Received for Hogs by Month – United States Chart .................................................................................................. 13

Prices Received for Poultry by Month – United States Chart ............................................................................................... 13

Prices Received for All Wheat, Corn, and Soybeans by Month – United States: 2013 with Comparisons .......................... 14

Prices Received for Beef Cattle and All Hogs by Month – United States: 2013 with Comparisons .................................... 14

Prices Received for All Wheat – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ......................................... 15

Prices Received for Winter Wheat – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ................................... 15

Prices Received for Durum Wheat – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ................................... 16

Prices Received for Spring Wheat – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons .................................... 16

Prices Received for All Barley – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ......................................... 17

Prices Received for Malting Barley – States: September 2013 with Comparisons ............................................................... 17

Prices Received for Feed Barley – States: September 2013 with Comparisons ................................................................... 17

Prices Received for Corn – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons .................................................. 18

Prices Received for Soybeans – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons .......................................... 18

Prices Received for Oats – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons .................................................. 19

Prices Received for Sorghum Grain – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ................................. 19

Prices Received for Dry Beans – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ......................................... 20

Prices Received for Peanuts (in shell) – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons .............................. 20

Prices Received for Sunflower – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ......................................... 21

Prices Received for Canola – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons .............................................. 21

Prices Received for Flaxseed – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons............................................ 21

Prices Received for Upland Cotton and Cottonseed – States and United States: September 2013

with Comparisons .............................................................................................................................................................. 22

Prices Received and Farm Marketings for Upland Cotton and Rice – United States: September 2013

with Comparisons .............................................................................................................................................................. 22

Prices Received for Hay by Type – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ..................................... 23

Prices Received for Apples – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons .............................................. 23

Prices Received for Citrus Fruits by Utilization – States and United States: September 2012 ............................................. 24

Prices Received for Citrus Fruits by Utilization – States and United States: August 2013 .................................................. 25

Prices Received for Citrus Fruits by Utilization – States and United States: September 2013 ............................................. 26

Prices Received for Potatoes – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ............................................ 27

Prices Received for All Milk – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ............................................ 28

Prices Received for Milk Cows – States and United States: July 2013 with Comparisons .................................................. 29

Page 3: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 3 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Commodity Parity Prices and Price as Percent of Parity Price – United States: September 2013

with Comparisons .............................................................................................................................................................. 30

Commodity Parity Prices – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ................................................................... 31

Marketing Year for Specified Commodities ......................................................................................................................... 33

Dry Edible Peas Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2010

through 2012 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 34

Austrian Winter Peas Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2010

through 2012 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 34

Lentils Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2010 through 2012 .............. 34

Lentils Prices Received and Farm Marketings by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2010-2011

through 2012-2013 ............................................................................................................................................................ 35

Dry Edible Peas Prices Received and Farm Marketings by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2010-2011

through 2012-2013 ............................................................................................................................................................ 35

Austrian Winter Peas Prices Received and Farm Marketings by Month – United States: Marketing Years

2010-2011 through 2012-2013 .......................................................................................................................................... 36

Corn Prices Received and Farm Marketings by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2010-2011

through 2012-2013 ............................................................................................................................................................ 36

Sorghum Grain Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2010

through 2012 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 37

Sorghum Grain Farm Marketing Percent by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2011-2012

and 2012-2013 ................................................................................................................................................................... 37

Sorghum Grain Prices Received by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2011-2012

and 2012-2013 ................................................................................................................................................................... 38

Soybean Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2010 through 2012 ........... 40

Soybean Prices Received by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 ................... 41

Soybean Farm Marketing Percent by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2011-2012

and 2012-2013 ................................................................................................................................................................... 43

Reliability of Prices Received Estimates .............................................................................................................................. 44

Prices Paid by Farmers .......................................................................................................................................................... 45

Prices Paid Indexes and Related Parity Ratios – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons .................................. 46

Prices Paid Indexes and Annual Weights for Input Components and Sub-components – United States:

September 2013 with Comparisons ................................................................................................................................... 47

Paid Indexes by Month, All Items and Production Items –

United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart ................................................................................................................................ 48

Paid Indexes, Annual Averages, Production Items, Interest, Taxes, and Wages –

United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart ................................................................................................................................ 48

Paid Indexes by Farm Type, All Items – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart ................................................................... 49

Paid Indexes by Origin, All Production Items – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart ....................................................... 49

Paid Indexes by Non-Farm Sector, Supplies & Repairs, Fertilizer, Machinery, and Fuel –

United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart ................................................................................................................................ 50

Paid Indexes by Month, Feed and Replacement Livestock – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart .................................... 50

Feed Price Ratios – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ............................................................................... 51

Prices Received Used to Calculate Feed Price Ratios – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ....................... 51

Prices Paid for Feeder Livestock – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons ....................................................... 51

Reliability of Prices Paid Estimates ...................................................................................................................................... 52

Information Contacts ............................................................................................................................................................ 53

Page 4: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

4 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received by Farmers

The September All Farm Products Index is 185 percent of its 1990-1992 base, down 2.1 percent from the August index

and 5.1 percent below the September 2012 index.

All crops: The September index, at 206, decreased 3.7 percent from August and is 9.3 percent below September 2012.

Index decreases for feed grains & hay and commercial vegetables more than offset the index increases for fruits & nuts

and oilseeds.

Food grains: The September index, at 228, is down 1.3 percent from the previous month and 14 percent below a year

ago. The September price for all wheat, at $6.75 per bushel, is down 12 cents from August and $1.52 below September

2012.

Feed grains & hay: The September index, at 230, declined 13 percent from last month and is 21 percent below a year

ago. The corn price, at $5.28 per bushel, is down 93 cents from last month and $1.61 below September 2012. The all hay

price, at $176 per ton, is down $4.00 from August and $9.00 from last September. Sorghum grain, at $8.15 per cwt, is

67 cents lower than August and $3.35 below September last year.

Cotton, Upland: The September index, at 126, is down 0.8 percent from August but 7.7 percent above last year. The

September price, at 76.1 cents per pound, is down 0.8 cents from the previous month but 5.4 cents higher than last

September.

Oilseeds: The September index, at 241, is up 1.7 percent from August and 0.4 percent higher than September 2012. The

soybean price, at $13.80 per bushel, decreased 30 cents from August and is 50 cents below September 2012.

Fruits & nuts: The September index, at 208, is up 8.3 percent from August but 3.3 percent lower than a year ago. The

price of oranges, at $12.39 per box, increased $2.39 from last month and is $3.27 higher than last September.

Commercial vegetables: The September index, at 156, is down 19 percent from last month and 9.3 percent below

September 2012.

Potatoes & dry beans: The September index, at 174, is down 10 percent from last month but 23 percent above

September 2012. The all potato price, at $9.40 per cwt, is down $1.75 from August but up $2.09 from last September. The

all dry bean price, at $40.40 per cwt, is up 40 cents from the previous month and $2.20 above September 2012.

Livestock and products: The September index, at 162, is 0.6 percent below last month but up 3.8 percent from

September 2012. Compared with a year ago, prices are higher for hogs, broilers, calves, cattle, and milk. Prices for eggs

and turkeys are lower than last year.

Meat animals: The September index, at 165, is unchanged from last month but 7.1 percent higher than last year. The

September hog price, at $69.20 per cwt, is down $5.00 from August but $13.50 higher than a year ago. The September

beef cattle price of $123 per cwt is up $1.00 from last month and $2.00 higher than September 2012.

Dairy products: The September index, at 152, is up 2.0 percent from a month ago and 0.7 percent higher than September

last year. The September all milk price of $19.80 per cwt is up 30 cents from last month and 10 cents higher than

September 2012.

Poultry & eggs: The September index, at 167, is down 1.2 percent from August but 0.6 percent above a year ago. The

September market egg price, at 82.3 cents per dozen, decreased 4.7 cents from August and is 23.7 cents below September

2012. The September broiler price, at 53.0 cents per pound, is unchanged from August but 5.0 cents above a year ago. The

September turkey price, at 66.7 cents per pound, is down 0.7 cents from the previous month and 9.5 cents from a year

earlier.

Page 5: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 5 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received Indexes – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons [Revised historical price indexes for months not shown are available at www.nass.usda.gov]

Index

1910-1914 Base 1990-1992 Base

1990-1992 Average

September 2012

August 2013

September 2013

September 2012

August 2013

September 2013

(percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent)

All products ............................................ All crops ................................................. Food grains ........................................ Feed grains & hay .............................. Cotton, Upland ................................... Tobacco ............................................. Oilseeds ............................................ Fruits & nuts ...................................... Commercial vegetables ..................... Potatoes & dry beans ......................... Other crops ........................................ Livestock and products .......................... Meat animals ..................................... Dairy products ................................... Poultry & eggs ................................... Food commodities .................................

639

500 325 363 517

1263 554 716 698 540 493

768

1021 799 282

(NA)

1236

1125 844

1041 598

1559 1314 1502 1226 722 647

1196 1564 1212 465

(NA)

1201

1062 733 941 651

1760 1300 1338 1373 985 645

1246 1683 1200 474

(NA)

1176

1020 724 820 644

1760 1322 1449 1111 884 645

1245 1681 1218 470

(NA)

195

227 266 292 117 103 240 215 172 142 131

156 154 151 166

182

189

214 231 264 127 116 237 192 192 194 131

163 165 149 169

181

185

206 228 230 126 116 241 208 156 174 131

162 165 152 167

181

(NA) Not available.

Prices Received and Prices Paid Indexes by Month for Selected Groups – United States: 2012 and 2013, 1990-1992 Base [Revised historical price indexes for months not shown are available at www.nass.usda.gov. Blank data cells indicate estimation period has not yet begun]

Month

Index of prices received Index of prices paid

All farm products

All crops

Livestock and

products

All items

Production items

2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013

(percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent)

January ............................ February ........................... March ............................... April .................................. May .................................. June ................................. July ................................... August .............................. September ........................ October ............................ November ......................... December .........................

189 181 184 179 180 183 191 194 195 210 207 199

217 199 201 192 196 200 200 189 185

213 207 211 210 214 214 231 234 227 238 238 226

250 234 238 222 224 232 230 214 206

155 156 159 152 151 152 149 154 156 162 167 165

166 162 164 164 170 167 164 163 162

210 211 215 215 214 214 213 216 217 218 217 217

219 220 220 219 220 219 220 216 213

222 223 229 228 228 227 227 231 232 232 231 231

233 234 234 233 233 233 234 229 224

Page 6: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

6 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

70

120

170

220

270

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Percent

Received Indexes by Month, Livestock Products, All Products, and All Crops – United States: 1990-1992=100

Livestock Products All Products All Crops

25

75

125

175

225

275

325

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Percent

Received Indexes by Month, Food Grains, Feed Grains & Hay, and Oilseeds – United States: 1990-1992=100

Food Grain Feed Grain & Hay Oilseeds

Page 7: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 7 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

50

100

150

200

250

300

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Percent

Received Indexes by Month, Fruit & Nuts and Commercial Vegetables – United States: 1990-1992=100

Fruit & Nuts Commercial Vegetables

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

210

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Percent

Received Indexes by Month, Meat Animal, Dairy Product, and Poultry & Egg – United States: 1990-1992=100

Meat Animal Dairy Product Poultry & Egg

Page 8: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

8 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Field Crops and Fruits – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

Commodity Average

1990-1992 September 2012 August 2013

Preliminary September 2013

Field crops Austrian winter peas ............................................ dollars/cwt Barley, all ....................................................... dollars/bushel Feed ............................................................ dollars/bushel Malting ......................................................... dollars/bushel Beans, dry edible ................................................ dollars/cwt Canola ................................................................ dollars/cwt Chickpeas, all ..................................................... dollars/cwt Large ................................................................ dollars/cwt Small ................................................................. dollars/cwt Corn ............................................................... dollars/bushel Cotton, Upland ................................................ dollars/pound Cottonseed .......................................................... dollars/ton Flaxseed ........................................................ dollars/bushel Hay, all, baled ...................................................... dollars/ton Alfalfa ................................................................. dollars/ton Other .................................................................. dollars/ton Lentils ................................................................. dollars/cwt Oats ............................................................... dollars/bushel Peanuts, in-shell ............................................. dollars/pound Peas, dry edible .................................................. dollars/cwt Potatoes ............................................................. dollars/cwt Rice, all ............................................................... dollars/cwt Long .................................................................. dollars/cwt Medium and short ............................................. dollars/cwt Sorghum grain .................................................... dollars/cwt Soybeans ....................................................... dollars/bushel Sunflowers, all ..................................................... dollars/cwt Wheat, all ....................................................... dollars/bushel Winter .......................................................... dollars/bushel Durum .......................................................... dollars/bushel Other spring ................................................. dollars/bushel Hard red winter 1 .......................................... dollars/bushel Soft red winter 1 ............................................ dollars/bushel Hard red spring 1 .......................................... dollars/bushel White 1 ......................................................... dollars/bushel Fruits Citrus, equivalent on-tree Grapefruit .......................................................... dollars/box Lemons ............................................................. dollars/box Oranges ............................................................ dollars/box Tangelos ........................................................... dollars/box Tangerines and mandarins ................................ dollars/box Noncitrus, fresh Apples 2 ........................................................ dollars/pound Grapes 2 ............................................................. dollars/ton Peaches 2 ........................................................... dollars/ton Pears 2 ............................................................... dollars/ton Strawberries ...................................................... dollars/cwt

(NA) 2.12 1.90 2.43

19.10 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) 2.30

0.606 96.00 4.27

76.30 77.20 60.00 (NA) 1.22

0.304 (NA)

5.82 7.07 (NA) (NA) 3.75 5.61 9.50

2.96 2.93 2.86 3.11 (NA) (NA) (NA) 3.24

5.77 10.10 5.79 5.82

15.11

0.212 506.00 432.00 370.00 56.00

20.90 6.42 5.58 6.70

38.20 27.00 38.20 40.40 28.70 6.89

0.707

254.00 13.30

185.00 206.00 140.00 21.20 3.76

0.352 14.50

7.31

14.30 13.80 17.80 11.50 14.30 28.80

8.27 8.25 7.77 8.38 8.36 8.38 8.42 7.99

10.13 14.94 9.08

(S) (S)

0.616 1,130.00

689.00 601.00 87.60

(D) 6.13 4.40 6.55

40.00 22.20 31.60 32.90 27.10 6.21

0.769 (NA)

14.90 180.00 200.00 140.00 18.70 3.63

0.251 14.50

11.15 15.80 15.20 17.50 8.82

14.10 23.70

6.87 6.81 7.76 6.97 6.94 6.34 6.98 6.90

6.36 28.45 10.00

(S) (S)

(NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

(S) 5.25 3.72 5.91

40.40 20.00

(S) (S) (S)

5.28

0.761 190.00 14.40

176.00 194.00 136.00 18.70 3.68

0.287 12.80

9.40

16.30 15.90 19.10 8.15

13.80 21.80

6.75 6.71 7.77 6.73 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

8.76 29.99 12.39

(S) (S)

(NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate. 1 Preliminary estimates not set for this item. 2 Equivalent packinghouse-door returns for California, Michigan, New York (apples only), and Washington (apples, peaches, and pears). Prices as

sold for other states.

Page 9: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 9 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Vegetables and Livestock – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons [Price data source for livestock and poultry commodities is United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Marketing Service]

Commodity Average

1990-1992 September 2012 August 2013

Preliminary September 2013

Vegetables, fresh 1 Asparagus ........................................................... dollars/cwt Beans, snap 2 ...................................................... dollars/cwt Broccoli ................................................................ dollars/cwt Cantaloupes 2 ...................................................... dollars/cwt Carrots ................................................................. dollars/cwt Cauliflower ........................................................... dollars/cwt Celery .................................................................. dollars/cwt Corn, sweet ......................................................... dollars/cwt Cucumbers 2 ........................................................ dollars/cwt Lettuce ................................................................. dollars/cwt Onions 3 ............................................................... dollars/cwt Tomatoes ............................................................ dollars/cwt Livestock Calves ................................................................. dollars/cwt Cattle, all beef ...................................................... dollars/cwt Cows 4 ............................................................... dollars/cwt Steers and heifers .............................................. dollars/cwt Milk cows 5 ........................................................ dollars/head Hogs, all .............................................................. dollars/cwt Barrows and gilts ............................................... dollars/cwt Sows ................................................................. dollars/cwt Dairy and poultry Milk, all 6 .............................................................. dollars/cwt Fat test .................................................................. percent Broilers, live 7 .................................................. dollars/pound Eggs, all 8 ....................................................... dollars/dozen Market 8 9 ...................................................... dollars/dozen Turkeys, live 8 10 .............................................. dollars/pound

79.80 (NA)

22.50 (NA)

13.20 26.80 11.60 15.70 (NA)

11.90 12.80 32.30

94.30 72.90 49.60 77.10

1130.00 47.70 48.40 39.50

13.06 3.66

0.317 0.643 0.546 0.380

(S) 98.20 40.40 20.20 21.70 39.20 24.80 22.70 26.80 20.50 11.10 26.20

162.00 121.00 79.20

125.00 (NA)

55.70 56.30 39.10

19.70 3.70

0.480 1.220 1.060 0.762

(NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

168.00 122.00 82.80

125.00 (NA)

74.20 74.10 75.90

19.50 3.63

0.530 1.080 0.870 0.674

(NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

198.00 123.00 84.00

126.00 (NA)

69.20 69.10 70.70

19.80 3.69

0.530 1.040 0.823 0.667

Adjusted for seasonal variation Eggs, all .......................................................... dollars/dozen Seasonal factor ...................................................... percent Milk, all 6 .............................................................. dollars/cwt Seasonal factor ...................................................... percent

0.545

100 9.71 100

1.260

97 18.90

104

1.030

105 19.10

102

1.070

97 19.00

104

(NA) Not available. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate. 1 Beginning January 2006, point of first sale. FOB shipping point for prior years. 2 Monthly estimates began January 1995. 3 Includes some processing. 4 Beef cows and cull dairy cows sold for slaughter. 5 Animals sold for dairy herd replacement only. Prices available for January, April, July, and October. 6 Before deductions for hauling. Includes quality, quantity, and other premiums. Excludes hauling subsidies. 7 Live weight equivalent price. 8 Mid-month price. 9 Also referred to as table eggs. 10 Live weight equivalent price is used when actual live weight price is not available. Beginning January 2011, price reflects FOB shipping point

basis. Prior year price reflects delivered basis.

Page 10: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

10 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Dollars per bushel

Prices Received for Corn by Month – United States

2

4

6

8

10

12

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Dollars per bushel

Prices Received for Wheat by Month – United States

Page 11: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 11 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Dollars per pound

Prices Received for Upland Cotton by Month – United States

3

5

7

9

11

13

15

17

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Dollars per bushel

Prices Received for Soybeans by Month – United States

Page 12: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

12 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Dollars per cwt

Prices Received for Cattle by Month – United States

Calves Steers & Heifers All Beef Cattle Cows

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Dollars per cwt

Prices Received for Milk by Month – United States

Page 13: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 13 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

30

40

50

60

70

80

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Dollars per cwt

Prices Received for Hogs by Month – United States

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Dollars per pound

Prices Received for Poultry by Month – United States

Turkeys Broilers

Page 14: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

14 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for All Wheat, Corn, and Soybeans by Month – United States: 2013 with Comparisons [Current month prices are mid-month; prices for previous months and years are for the entire month. Blank data cells indicate estimation period has not yet begun]

Month

All wheat Corn Soybeans

2011 2012 Preliminary

2013 2011 2012

Preliminary 2013

2011 2012 Preliminary

2013

(dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel)

January ........ February ...... March ........... April ............. May .............. June ............. July .............. August ......... September ... October ........ November .... December ....

6.69 7.42 7.55 8.01 8.16 7.41 7.10 7.59 7.54 7.27 7.30 7.20

7.05 7.10 7.20 7.11 6.67 6.70 7.89 8.04 8.27 8.38 8.47 8.30

8.12 7.97 7.79 7.71 7.68 7.32 6.93 6.87 6.75

4.94 5.65 5.53 6.36 6.32 6.38 6.33 6.88 6.38 5.73 5.83 5.86

6.07 6.28 6.35 6.34 6.34 6.37 7.14 7.63 6.89 6.78 7.01 6.87

6.96 7.04 7.13 6.97 6.97 6.97 6.79 6.21 5.28

11.60 12.70 12.70 13.10 13.20 13.20 13.20 13.40 12.20 11.80 11.70 11.50

11.90 12.20 13.00 13.80 14.00 13.90 15.40 16.20 14.30 14.20 14.30 14.30

14.30 14.60 14.60 14.40 14.90 15.10 15.30 14.10 13.80

Prices Received for Beef Cattle and All Hogs by Month – United States: 2013 with Comparisons [Current month prices are mid-month; prices for previous months and years are for the entire month. Blank data cells indicate estimation period has not yet begun]

Month

Beef cattle 1 All hogs 2

2011 2012 Preliminary

2013 2011 2012

Preliminary 2013

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

January ............. February ........... March ................ April .................. May ................... June .................. July ................... August .............. September ........ October ............. November ......... December .........

107.00 108.00 115.00 119.00 112.00 107.00 111.00 111.00 112.00 117.00 120.00 120.00

125.00 127.00 128.00 124.00 122.00 121.00 114.00 117.00 121.00 123.00 123.00 124.00

126.00 123.00 124.00 124.00 124.00 121.00 120.00 122.00 123.00

56.00 61.40 62.90 67.80 68.60 69.70 71.70 75.80 67.10 68.70 64.40 63.50

63.50 65.50 65.20 62.80 62.80 70.20 72.10 66.90 55.70 62.00 61.10 62.40

63.80 64.50 59.20 61.80 68.60 74.40 75.80 74.20 69.20

1 Cows and steers & heifers. 2 Barrows & gilts and sows.

Page 15: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 15 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for All Wheat – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Arizona ............................................ Arkansas ......................................... California ......................................... Colorado .......................................... Idaho ............................................... Illinois .............................................. Indiana ............................................ Kansas ............................................ Michigan .......................................... Minnesota ........................................ Missouri ........................................... Montana .......................................... Nebraska ......................................... North Carolina ................................. North Dakota ................................... Ohio ................................................. Oklahoma ........................................ Oregon ............................................ South Dakota ................................... Texas .............................................. Washington ..................................... United States ...................................

(D) 7.89 (D)

8.26 7.98 8.59 8.88 8.55 8.37 8.53

7.94 8.19 8.42 8.05 8.13 8.41 8.63 8.13 8.31 7.99 8.13

8.27

8.32 6.56 (D)

6.96 6.81 6.47 6.15 6.90 6.43 6.84

6.50 7.14 7.05 5.57 7.05 6.45 6.83 7.10 6.83 7.08 7.12

6.87

7.75 (D) (D)

6.75 6.94 6.30 6.10 6.78 6.23 6.60

6.50 6.85 6.90 5.50 6.62 6.33 6.74 7.14 6.60 6.92 6.98

6.75

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations.

Prices Received for Winter Wheat – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Arkansas ......................................... California ......................................... Colorado .......................................... Idaho ............................................... Illinois .............................................. Indiana ............................................ Kansas ............................................ Michigan .......................................... Minnesota ........................................ Missouri ........................................... Montana .......................................... Nebraska ......................................... North Carolina ................................. North Dakota ................................... Ohio ................................................. Oklahoma ........................................ Oregon ............................................ South Dakota ................................... Texas .............................................. Washington ..................................... United States ...................................

7.89 (D)

8.28 7.90 8.59 8.88 8.55 8.37 (D)

7.94

7.97 8.42 8.05 7.88 8.41 8.63 8.08 8.13 7.99 8.04

8.25

6.56 (D)

6.96 6.80 6.47 6.15 6.90 6.43 5.91 6.50

7.06 7.05 5.57 6.54 6.45 6.83 7.08 6.80 7.08 7.05

6.81

(D) (D)

6.75 6.75 6.30 6.10 6.78 6.23

(S) 6.50

6.80 6.90 5.50 6.20 6.33 6.74 7.10 6.50 6.92 6.90

6.71

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Page 16: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

16 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Durum Wheat – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Arizona ........................................... California ........................................ Idaho ............................................... Montana .......................................... North Dakota ................................... United States ..................................

(D) (S) (D)

7.79 7.48

7.77

8.32 (D) (D)

7.75 7.74

7.76

7.75 (S) (D) (D)

8.00

7.77

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Spring Wheat – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Colorado ......................................... Idaho ............................................... Minnesota ....................................... Montana .......................................... North Dakota ................................... Oregon ............................................ South Dakota .................................. Washington ..................................... United States ..................................

(D) 8.15 8.53 8.42 8.35 8.29 8.43 8.54

8.38

(S) 6.84 6.91 7.18 6.93 7.28 6.84 7.48

6.97

(S) 7.40 6.60 6.80 6.50 7.35 6.66 7.39

6.73

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Page 17: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 17 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for All Barley – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

California ......................................... Colorado .......................................... Idaho ............................................... Minnesota ........................................ Montana .......................................... North Dakota ................................... Oregon ............................................ Utah ................................................. Washington ..................................... Wyoming ......................................... United States ...................................

(D) 6.65 6.43 (D)

6.43 6.96 6.32 5.91 5.49 (D)

6.42

(D) (D)

6.31 6.14 6.68 5.96 4.39 4.33 4.52 (D)

6.13

(S) (D)

6.20 (S)

5.81 4.86 3.87 4.34 3.66 (D)

5.25

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Malting Barley – States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Idaho ............................................... Minnesota ........................................ Montana .......................................... North Dakota ................................... Wyoming .........................................

6.57 (D)

6.51 7.04 (D)

6.72 (D)

6.73 6.17 (D)

6.47 (S)

5.84 5.30 (D)

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Feed Barley – States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Idaho ............................................... Minnesota ........................................ Montana .......................................... North Dakota ................................... Wyoming .........................................

5.79 (D)

5.57 5.33 (D)

4.22 4.02 4.27 4.08 (D)

4.41 (S) (D)

3.10 (D)

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Page 18: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

18 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Corn – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Colorado ......................................... Illinois .............................................. Indiana ............................................ Iowa ................................................ Kansas ............................................ Kentucky ......................................... Michigan ......................................... Minnesota ....................................... Missouri .......................................... Nebraska ........................................ North Carolina ................................. North Dakota ................................... Ohio ................................................ Pennsylvania .................................. South Dakota .................................. Tennessee ...................................... Texas .............................................. Wisconsin ....................................... United States ..................................

6.67 6.84 7.37 6.84 6.87 6.75 6.92 6.47 7.30 6.88

7.45 6.26 7.33 7.45 6.83 6.98 6.80 7.05

6.89

6.80 6.09 6.38 6.32 6.13 6.10 6.04 6.24 6.42 6.45

5.85 5.97 6.34 6.10 5.99 6.23 5.01 6.18

6.21

5.79 5.30 5.10 5.10 5.10 5.50 5.30 5.50 5.50 5.60

5.30 4.80 5.03 5.00 4.86 5.60 5.26 5.40

5.28

Prices Received for Soybeans – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Arkansas ......................................... Illinois .............................................. Indiana ............................................ Iowa ................................................ Kansas ............................................ Kentucky ......................................... Louisiana ........................................ Michigan ......................................... Minnesota ....................................... Mississippi ...................................... Missouri .......................................... Nebraska ........................................ North Carolina ................................. North Dakota ................................... Ohio ................................................ South Dakota .................................. Tennessee ...................................... Wisconsin ....................................... United States ..................................

14.10 15.20 14.80 14.40 14.40 14.80 15.00 13.60 14.20 14.30

15.30 13.70 16.20 14.20 14.80 14.20 14.30 13.50

14.30

(D) 14.20 14.90 14.20 13.90 13.60

(D) 14.40 14.30 12.70

13.70 13.50 14.20 13.10 14.60 13.80 13.20 14.40

14.10

13.50 13.90 14.20 14.20 13.90 14.00

(D) 13.70 13.70 13.50

14.00 13.70 14.20 13.10 14.20 13.40 14.00 13.80

13.80

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations.

Page 19: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 19 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Oats – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Illinois .............................................. Iowa ................................................. Michigan .......................................... Minnesota ........................................ Montana .......................................... Nebraska ......................................... New York ......................................... North Dakota ................................... Oregon ............................................ Pennsylvania ................................... South Dakota ................................... Texas .............................................. Wisconsin ........................................ United States ...................................

(S) 3.93 (D)

3.54 (D) (D) (D)

3.36 (D)

3.91 3.84

(S) 3.80

3.76

3.83 3.71 3.51 3.85

(S) (D) (D)

3.17 (D)

3.76 3.54 (D)

3.83

3.63

(S) 3.60 3.90 3.85

(S) (D) (D)

3.15 (S)

3.81 3.61 (D)

3.85

3.68

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Sorghum Grain – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Arkansas ......................................... Illinois .............................................. Kansas ............................................ Louisiana ......................................... Missouri ........................................... Nebraska ......................................... Oklahoma ........................................ Texas .............................................. United States ...................................

11.00 12.80 12.40 11.30 11.80 11.70 11.80 11.50

11.50

(D) (D)

9.88 8.85

11.90 10.20 8.81 8.68

8.82

(D) (S)

7.94 (D)

10.00 8.80 7.00 8.13

8.15

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Page 20: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

20 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Dry Beans – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

California ........................................ Colorado ......................................... Idaho ............................................... Michigan ......................................... Minnesota ....................................... Nebraska ........................................ North Dakota ................................... United States ..................................

(D)

41.70 38.50 40.70 40.60 39.50 36.20

38.20

(D) (D)

32.90 (D) (D)

42.60 39.30

40.00

(S) (D) (D)

42.50 (D)

42.90 38.60

40.40

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Peanuts (in shell) – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per pound) (dollars per pound) (dollars per pound)

Alabama ......................................... Florida ............................................. Georgia ........................................... Mississippi ...................................... New Mexico .................................... North Carolina ................................. Oklahoma ....................................... South Carolina ................................ Texas .............................................. Virginia ............................................ United States ..................................

0.360 0.353 0.350 0.372

(D) 0.353

(S) 0.345 0.334

(D)

0.352

0.233 0.225 0.257 0.205

(S) 0.275

(D) 0.271 0.263 0.269

0.251

(S) (D)

0.275 (S) (S)

0.309 (D) (D) (S) (D)

0.287

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Page 21: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 21 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Sunflower – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Colorado .......................................... Kansas ............................................ Minnesota ........................................ North Dakota ................................... South Dakota ................................... United States ...................................

(D) (D) (D)

29.00 28.00

28.80

(S) 20.60 26.10 23.90 22.20

23.70

(S) (D) (D)

23.20 (D)

21.80

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Canola – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Minnesota ........................................ North Dakota ................................... United States ...................................

(D) 27.00

27.00

(S) 22.20

22.20

(S) 20.00

20.00

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Flaxseed – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

North Dakota ................................... United States ...................................

13.30

13.30

14.90

14.90

14.40

14.40

Page 22: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

22 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Upland Cotton and Cottonseed – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons [Cottonseed marketing year August - February]

State

Cotton, Upland Cottonseed

September 2012

August 2013

Preliminary September

2013

September 2012

August 2013

Preliminary September

2013

(dollars per pound) (dollars per pound) (dollars per pound) (dollars per ton) (dollars per ton) (dollars per ton)

Alabama ............................ Arizona .............................. Arkansas ............................ California ........................... Georgia .............................. Louisiana ........................... Mississippi ......................... North Carolina .................... Tennessee ......................... Texas ................................. United States .....................

(D) (D) (D) (S)

0.818 0.688

(D) (D) (D)

0.706

0.707

(S) (S) (S) (S) (D) (S) (D) (D) (S)

0.767

0.769

(S) (S) (S) (S)

0.768 (S) (S) (S) (S)

0.743

0.761

(S) 360.00 275.00

(S) 219.00 222.00

(S) (S) (S)

252.00

254.00

(NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

(NA)

(S) (S) (S) (S) (S)

272.00 (S) (S) (S)

185.00

190.00

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received and Farm Marketings for Upland Cotton and Rice – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

Item September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

Cotton, Upland Average price ..................................... dollars/pound Marketings 1 .......................................... 1,000 bales Rice, all Average price .......................................... dollars/cwt Marketings 2 ............................................. 1,000 cwt Rice, long Average price .......................................... dollars/cwt Marketings 2 ............................................. 1,000 cwt Rice, medium and short Average price .......................................... dollars/cwt Marketings 2 ............................................. 1,000 cwt

0.707 416

14.30 10,630

13.80 9,172

17.80 1,458

0.769 46

15.80 8,697

15.20 6,668

17.50 2,029

0.761 (NA)

16.30 (NA)

15.90 (NA)

19.10 (NA)

(NA) Not available. 1 Marketings based on a survey of cotton buyers in the major producing States - Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Louisiana,

Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. 2 Purchases by private firms and rice (rough equivalent) shipped by cooperatives.

Page 23: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 23 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Hay by Type – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State

All hay Alfalfa hay Other hay

September 2012

August 2013

Preliminary September

2013

September 2012

August 2013

Preliminary September

2013

September 2012

August 2013

Preliminary September

2013

(dollars per

ton) (dollars per

ton) (dollars per

ton) (dollars per

ton) (dollars per

ton) (dollars per

ton) (dollars per

ton) (dollars per

ton) (dollars per

ton)

Arizona ............ California ......... Colorado .......... Idaho ............... Illinois .............. Iowa ................. Kansas ............ Kentucky .......... Michigan .......... Minnesota ........ Missouri ........... Montana .......... Nebraska ......... Nevada ............ New Mexico ..... New York ......... North Dakota ... Ohio ................. Oklahoma ........ Oregon ............ Pennsylvania ... South Dakota ... Texas .............. Utah ................. Washington ..... Wisconsin ........ Wyoming ......... United States ...

202.00 201.00 232.00 184.00 156.00 201.00 190.00 115.00 165.00 139.00

115.00 141.00 199.00 201.00 226.00 137.00 119.00 191.00 121.00 210.00

145.00 204.00 124.00 187.00 232.00 145.00 207.00

185.00

190.00 192.00 244.00 197.00 163.00 192.00 180.00 127.00 168.00 140.00

126.00 137.00 189.00 209.00 237.00 152.00 109.00 180.00 140.00 208.00

171.00 159.00 132.00 184.00 214.00 151.00 195.00

180.00

180.00 194.00 234.00 180.00 161.00 195.00 193.00 120.00 166.00 160.00

123.00 139.00 168.00 196.00 239.00 152.00 113.00 163.00 128.00 200.00

161.00 128.00 126.00 183.00 210.00 182.00 190.00

176.00

200.00 205.00 235.00 190.00 165.00 217.00 220.00 195.00 175.00 160.00

210.00 144.00 219.00 203.00 234.00 175.00 131.00 221.00 229.00 226.00

189.00 222.00 238.00 187.00 235.00 155.00 210.00

206.00

190.00 201.00 245.00 200.00 190.00 205.00 211.00 195.00 180.00 165.00

240.00 140.00 209.00 212.00 245.00 205.00 115.00 195.00 205.00 198.00

189.00 166.00 237.00 187.00 205.00 160.00 200.00

200.00

180.00 201.00 235.00 180.00 175.00 210.00 225.00 195.00 180.00 190.00

235.00 140.00 181.00 196.00 246.00 205.00 118.00 185.00 190.00 200.00

178.00 135.00 235.00 187.00 200.00 200.00 195.00

194.00

220.00 190.00 205.00 130.00 120.00 133.00 125.00 90.00

145.00 110.00

100.00 113.00 146.00 178.00 174.00 117.00 83.00

142.00 113.00 175.00

133.00 151.00 101.00 150.00 225.00 110.00 195.00

140.00

210.00 161.00 230.00 170.00 140.00 130.00 108.00 95.00

145.00 120.00

110.00 123.00 151.00 190.00 182.00 135.00 77.00

155.00 99.00

217.00

166.00 119.00 93.00

155.00 235.00 120.00 180.00

140.00

200.00 161.00 230.00 180.00 125.00 130.00 119.00 95.00

140.00 120.00

105.00 130.00 136.00 190.00 191.00 137.00 76.00

140.00 95.00

200.00

156.00 105.00 95.00

150.00 235.00 120.00 175.00

136.00

Prices Received for Apples – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons [Equivalent packinghouse-door returns for California, Michigan, New York, and Washington. Prices at point of first sale for other States]

State

Apples, fresh use

September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per pound) (dollars per pound) (dollars per pound)

California ......................................... Michigan .......................................... New York ......................................... Ohio ................................................. Pennsylvania ................................... Virginia ............................................ Washington ..................................... United States ...................................

0.408 0.615 0.556 0.720

(S) 0.360 0.625

0.616

(NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

(NA)

(NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

(NA)

(NA) Not available. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Page 24: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

24 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Citrus Fruits by Utilization – States and United States: September 2012 [Net pounds per box: grapefruit in California-80, Florida-85, Texas-80; lemons-80; oranges in California-80, Florida-90, Texas-85; tangelos-90; tangerines and mandarins in Arizona and California-80, Florida-95]

Commodity, State,

and type

FOB packed fresh

Equivalent returns

Packinghouse door On-tree

All Fresh Process All Fresh Process

(dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box)

Grapefruit California 1 ........................................ United States .................................... Lemons California ........................................... United States .................................... Oranges California ........................................... Valencia ........................................ United States ....................................

18.80

18.80

35.20

35.20

23.80 23.80

23.80

12.27

12.27

20.48

20.54

11.59 11.59

11.59

12.27

12.27

26.12

26.15

14.99 14.99

14.99

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D) (D)

(D)

10.13

10.13

14.88

14.94

9.08 9.08

9.08

10.13

10.13

20.22

20.25

12.53 12.53

12.53

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D) (D)

(D)

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1 Some processed sales included in fresh sales.

Page 25: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 25 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Citrus Fruits by Utilization – States and United States: August 2013 [Net pounds per box: grapefruit in California-80, Florida-85, Texas-80; lemons-80; oranges in California-80, Florida-90, Texas-85; tangelos-90; tangerines and mandarins in Arizona and California-80, Florida-95]

Commodity, State,

and type

FOB packed fresh

Equivalent returns

Packinghouse door On-tree

All Fresh Process All Fresh Process

(dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box)

Grapefruit California 1 ........................................ United States .................................... Lemons California .......................................... United States .................................... Oranges California .......................................... Valencia ........................................ United States ....................................

15.20

15.20

47.50

47.50

23.40 23.40

23.40

8.54

8.54

34.34

34.34

12.54 12.54

12.54

8.54

8.54

38.24

38.24

14.41 14.41

14.41

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D) (D)

(D)

6.36

6.36

28.45

28.45

10.00 10.00

10.00

6.36

6.36

32.22

32.22

11.90 11.90

11.90

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D) (D)

(D)

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1 Some processed sales included in fresh sales.

Page 26: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

26 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Citrus Fruits by Utilization – States and United States: September 2013 [Net pounds per box: grapefruit in California-80, Florida-85, Texas-80; lemons-80; oranges in California-80, Florida-90, Texas-85; tangelos-90; tangerines and mandarins in Arizona and California-80, Florida-95]

Commodity, State,

and type

FOB packed fresh

Equivalent returns

Packinghouse door On-tree

All Fresh Process All Fresh Process

(dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box) (dollars per

box)

Grapefruit California 1 ........................................ United States .................................... Lemons California ........................................... United States .................................... Oranges California ........................................... Valencia ........................................ United States ....................................

17.60

17.60

47.70

47.70

26.30 26.30

26.30

10.94

10.94

35.92

35.92

14.93 14.93

14.93

10.94

10.94

38.44

38.44

17.31 17.31

17.31

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D) (D)

(D)

8.76

8.76

29.99

29.99

12.39 12.39

12.39

8.76

8.76

32.42

32.42

14.80 14.80

14.80

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D) (D)

(D)

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1 Some processed sales included in fresh sales.

Page 27: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 27 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Potatoes – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

State September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

California Spring .......................................... Fall .............................................. All 1 .............................................. Colorado Fresh 2 ......................................... All 1 .............................................. Florida ............................................. Idaho Fresh 2 ......................................... Processing ................................... All 1 .............................................. Maine .............................................. Michigan .......................................... Minnesota ........................................ New York ......................................... North Carolina ................................. North Dakota Fresh 2 ......................................... Processing ................................... All 1 .............................................. Oregon ............................................ Texas .............................................. Virginia ............................................ Washington Processing ................................... All 1 .............................................. Wisconsin Fresh 2 ......................................... Processing ................................... All 1 .............................................. United States Fresh 2 ......................................... Processing ................................... All 1 ..............................................

(S) (S) (S)

7.10 6.85

(S)

4.40 7.20 6.70 (D)

9.90 6.65

14.00 (S)

11.30 8.30 8.65 6.55

(S) (S)

6.45 6.55

8.80 7.80 8.20

7.42 7.28 7.31

(S) (S) (S)

22.20 22.20

(S)

15.70 8.00

10.60 (D)

8.95 14.10

(S) (S)

(S) (S) (S)

9.20 (S)

17.80

7.35 10.40

(D) (D)

15.70

19.66 7.74

11.15

(S) (S) (S)

(D)

17.30

(S)

(D) (D)

8.20 (D)

9.10 (D)

16.00 (S)

(D) (D) (D)

8.65 (S) (S)

(D) 8.55

(D) (D) (D)

(D) (D)

9.40

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate. 1 Average price of potatoes sold for all uses, including table stock, processing, seed, and livestock feed. 2 Fresh market prices only. Includes table stock prices.

Page 28: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

28 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for All Milk – States and United States: September 2013 with Comparisons [Before deduction for hauling. Includes quality, quantity, and other premiums. Excludes hauling subsidies]

State September 2012 August 2013

Preliminary September 2013

Price Fat test Price Fat test Price Fat test

(dollars per cwt) (percent) (dollars per cwt) (percent) (dollars per cwt) (percent)

Arizona ................................ California ............................. Colorado .............................. Florida .................................. Idaho .................................... Illinois ................................... Indiana ................................. Iowa ..................................... Kansas ................................. Michigan .............................. Minnesota ............................ Missouri ............................... New Mexico ......................... New York ............................. Ohio ..................................... Oregon ................................. Pennsylvania ....................... Texas ................................... Utah ..................................... Vermont ............................... Virginia ................................. Washington .......................... Wisconsin ............................ United States .......................

19.00 17.73 19.50 22.90 19.40 20.50 20.50 20.50 20.10 19.70

21.30 19.80 18.70 20.00 20.20 21.20 20.80 20.10 18.80 20.40

21.50 19.50 20.80

19.70

3.55 3.72 3.51 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.62 3.72 3.67 3.60

3.79 3.67 3.60 3.69 3.65 3.76 3.68 3.80 3.67 3.88

3.70 3.76 3.71

3.70

19.50 18.01 20.00 23.80 18.60 20.30 20.60 20.10 19.40 20.30

19.60 20.50 18.10 20.60 20.80 20.80 21.00 19.60 18.50 20.90

23.00 20.10 19.80

19.50

3.48 3.63 3.47 3.60 3.64 3.64 3.57 3.68 3.51 3.53

3.73 3.64 3.45 3.62 3.53 3.74 3.61 3.72 3.60 3.68

3.57 3.74 3.68

3.63

19.60 18.30 20.10 24.00 18.60 20.40 20.80 20.40 19.50 20.50

19.90 20.70 18.30 20.80 21.00 20.90 21.30 19.60 18.80 21.40

23.30 20.30 20.10

19.80

3.48 3.65 3.48 3.63 3.72 3.70 3.65 3.77 3.63 3.61

3.83 3.71 3.55 3.70 3.62 3.81 3.65 3.78 3.63 3.76

3.66 3.81 3.77

3.69

Page 29: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 29 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Milk Cows – States and United States: July 2013 with Comparisons [Animals sold for dairy herd replacement only. Prices estimated in January, April, July, and October]

State July 2012 April 2013 July 2013

(dollars per head) (dollars per head) (dollars per head)

Arizona ............................................ California ......................................... Colorado .......................................... Florida ............................................. Idaho ............................................... Illinois .............................................. Indiana ............................................ Iowa ................................................. Kansas ............................................ Michigan .......................................... Minnesota ........................................ Missouri ........................................... New Mexico ..................................... New York ......................................... Ohio ................................................. Oregon ............................................ Pennsylvania ................................... Texas .............................................. Utah ................................................. Vermont ........................................... Virginia ............................................ Washington ..................................... Wisconsin ........................................ United States ...................................

1,450 1,300 1,430 1,440 1,400 1,490 1,400 1,480 1,400 1,600

1,410 1,200 1,350 1,460 1,460 1,420 1,460 1,400 1,290 1,550

1,500 1,300 1,560

1,420

(NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

(NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

(NA) (NA) (NA)

(NA)

(NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

(NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

(NA) (NA) (NA)

(NA)

(NA) Not available.

Page 30: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

30 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Commodity Parity Prices and Price as Percent of Parity Price – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons [Parity prices are computed under the provisions of Title III, Subtitle a, Section 301 (a) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 as amended by the Agricultural Acts of 1948, 1949, and 1956. See January Agricultural Prices for details on adjusted base price and parity price computations. Parity data not available for blank cells. Primary source of data for livestock and milk prices is United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Marketing Service]

Commodity and unit Adjusted

base price

Parity price Price as percent

of parity

September 2012

August 2013

September 2013

September 2012

August 2013

September 2013

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (percent) (percent) (percent)

Basic commodities All wheat ....................................... bushel Rice ................................................... cwt Corn .............................................. bushel Cotton Upland ...................................... pound American Pima .......................... pound Peanuts ......................................... pound Designated nonbasic All milk, to plants 1 ................................ cwt Honey, extracted 2 ......................... pound Wool and mohair Wool ............................................. pound Mohair ........................................... pound Other nonbasic Apples, fresh 3 ............................... pound Barley ........................................... bushel Canola ............................................... cwt Cottonseed ........................................ ton Dry edible beans ................................ cwt Flaxseed ....................................... bushel Oats .............................................. bushel Potatoes ............................................. cwt Sorghum grain ................................... cwt Soybeans ...................................... bushel Sunflower, all ..................................... cwt Citrus (equivalent on-tree) Grapefruit ........................................... box Lemons .............................................. box Oranges ............................................. box Tangerines ......................................... box Livestock and poultry Beef cattle .......................................... cwt Calves ................................................ cwt Hogs .................................................. cwt Eggs 1 ............................................ dozen Turkeys, live .................................. pound

0.636 1.65

0.434

0.072 0.133 0.027

1.75 0.141

0.107 0.336

0.032 0.444 1.880 17.80 3.01

1.110 0.265 0.822 0.758 1.030 2.10

0.697 1.32

0.711 1.49

10.00 13.70 5.48

0.089 0.057

18.50 42.50 12.10

2.10 4.11

0.758

52.50 4.05

3.03 9.70

0.962 12.70 53.00

507.00 87.70 32.10 7.66

24.90 21.20 29.10 60.00

20.10 39.90 20.30 43.40

294.00 405.00 161.00

2.65 1.660

18.70 48.50 12.80

2.12 3.91

0.794

51.40 4.14

3.14 9.88

0.940 13.00 55.30

523.00 88.50 32.60 7.79

24.20 22.30 30.30 61.70

20.50 38.80 20.90 43.80

294.00 403.00 161.00

2.62 1.680

18.00 46.70 12.30

2.04 3.77

0.764

49.50 3.99

3.03 9.51

0.906 12.60 53.20

504.00 85.20 31.40 7.50

23.30 21.50 29.20 59.50

19.70 37.40 20.10 42.20

283.00 388.00 155.00

2.52 1.610

45 34 57

34 35 46

36 43

55 43

64 51 51 50 44 41 49 29 54 49 48

50 37 45 68

41 40 35 48 46

37 33 49

36 32 32

37 42

49 39

41 47 40 41 45 46 47 46 40 47 38

31 73 48

134

41 42 46 39 40

38 35 43

37 33 38

38 43

50 41

55 42 38 38 47 46 49 40 38 47 37

44 80 62

139

43 51 45 42 41

1 Seasonally adjusted price as percentage of parity price. 2 Wholesale extracted. Adjusted base price derived from state annual averages prices weighted by production. For 1982 through 1985 the national

averages are the support prices. 3 Equivalent packinghouse-door returns for California, New York, Oregon, and Washington. Price at point of first sale for other states.

Page 31: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 31 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Commodity Parity Prices – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons [Parity prices are computed under the provisions of Title III, Subtitle a, Section 301 (a) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 as amended by the Agricultural Acts of 1948, 1949, and 1956. See January Agricultural Prices for details on adjusted base price and parity price computations]

Commodity and unit Adjusted

base price

Parity price

September 2012

August 2013

September 2013

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Field crops and miscellaneous Hops ............................................................................ pound Mustard seed .................................................................... cwt Rapeseed ......................................................................... cwt Rye .............................................................................. bushel Safflower .......................................................................... cwt Spearmint oil ................................................................ pound Sweet potatoes ................................................................. cwt Tobacco Flue-cured, 11-14 .................................................... pound Fire-cured, 21-23 ..................................................... pound Burley, 31 ................................................................ pound Maryland, 32 ............................................................ pound Dark air-cured, 35-37 ............................................... pound Pennsylvania seedleaf, 41 ....................................... pound Cigar binder, 51 ....................................................... pound Noncitrus fruit Apples, processing 1 ......................................................... ton Apricots Fresh 2 .......................................................................... ton Dried (California) ........................................................... ton Avocados 2 ....................................................................... ton Cherries Sweet ........................................................................... ton Tart .......................................................................... pound Cranberry 3 ................................................................... barrel Dates (California) 2 ............................................................ ton Grapes Raisin variety ................................................................ ton Other dried .................................................................... ton Kiwifruit ............................................................................. ton Nectarines, fresh (California) 2 .......................................... ton Olives, canning (California) 3 ............................................. ton

0.303 2.85 2.25

0.535 2.04 1.50 2.08

0.185 0.267 0.188 0.167 0.240 0.176 0.610

16.60

111.00 252.00 189.00

205.00 0.033 4.68

161.00

133.00 61.70 88.60 54.60 87.70

8.92

82.20 65.00 15.30 58.90 43.70 64.40

5.71 8.25 5.89 5.07 7.46 5.36

18.70

481.00

3,580.00 7,550.00 5,940.00

6,270.00

0.991 141.00

5,160.00

3,640.00 1,630.00 2,740.00 1,580.00 2,610.00

8.91

83.80 66.10 15.70 60.00 44.10 61.10

5.44 7.85 5.53 4.91 7.05 5.17

17.90

488.00

3,260.00 7,410.00 5,550.00

6,020.00

0.970 138.00

4,730.00

3,910.00 1,810.00 2,600.00 1,600.00 2,580.00

8.58

80.70 63.70 15.10 57.80 42.50 58.90

5.24 7.56 5.32 4.73 6.79 4.98

17.30

470.00

3,140.00 7,130.00 5,350.00

5,800.00

0.934 132.00

4,560.00

3,770.00 1,750.00 2,510.00 1,550.00 2,480.00

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued

Page 32: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

32 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Commodity Parity Prices – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons (continued) [Parity prices are computed under the provisions of Title III, Subtitle a, Section 301 (a) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 as amended by the Agricultural Acts of 1948, 1949, and 1956. See January Agricultural Prices for details on adjusted base price and parity price computations]

Commodity and unit Adjusted

base price

Parity price

September 2012

August 2013

September 2013

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Noncitrus fruit - continued Papayas (Hawaii) ....................................................... pound Peaches Fresh 4 ........................................................................ ton Dried (California) ......................................................... ton Processing, excludes dried Clingstone (California) 3 ......................................... ton Pears Fresh 4 ........................................................................ ton Dried (California) 1 ....................................................... ton Plums (California) Fresh, equivalent on-tree ............................................ ton Prunes, dried (California) 1 .............................................. ton Prunes and plums Fresh, excludes California 5 ......................................... ton Processing, excludes dried 1 ....................................... ton Tree nuts 6 Almonds ..................................................................... pound Hazelnuts ........................................................................ ton Pistachios .................................................................. pound Walnuts ........................................................................... ton Vegetables, fresh 7 Carrots 8 .......................................................................... cwt Cauliflower 8 .................................................................... cwt Celery 8 ........................................................................... cwt Honeydew melons ........................................................... cwt Lettuce ............................................................................ cwt Onions 8 .......................................................................... cwt Tomatoes ........................................................................ cwt

0.038

80.20 48.50

31.60

54.70 150.00

58.10

143.00

61.90 23.80

0.211 191.00 0.194

185.00

2.57 4.04 1.94 1.97 2.09 1.41 4.30

1.28

2,390.00 1,560.00

970.00

1,620.00 4,980.00

1,710.00 4,310.00

1,820.00

734.00

6.21 5,710.00

5.71 5,220.00

78.40 126.00 58.60 60.90 66.70 43.40

136.00

1.12

2,360.00 1,430.00

929.00

1,610.00 4,410.00

1,710.00 4,200.00

1,820.00

699.00

6.20 5,610.00

5.70 5,440.00

75.50 119.00 57.00 57.90 61.40 41.40

126.00

1.08

2,270.00 1,370.00

895.00

1,550.00 4,250.00

1,640.00 4,050.00

1,750.00

674.00

5.97 5,410.00

5.49 5,240.00

72.80 114.00 54.90 55.80 59.20 39.90

122.00 1 Equivalent returns at processing plant door. 2 Equivalent returns at packinghouse door. 3 Equivalent returns for bulk fruit at first delivery point. 4 Equivalent packinghouse-door returns for California, New York (apples only), Oregon (except peaches), and Washington. Price at point of first sale

for other states. 5 Based on "as sold" prices for fresh fruit in all states. 6 Prices In-Shell basis except almonds which are shelled basis. 7 FOB shipping point prices. 8 Includes some processing.

Page 33: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 33 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Marketing Year for Specified Commodities

Corn for grain: September 1 to August 31 for United States, Arizona, California, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,

Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Virginia, and West

Virginia; July 1 to June 30 for Texas; August 1 to July 31 for Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana,

Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Tennessee; October 1 to September 30 for Colorado,

Connecticut, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New

York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

Sorghum for grain: September 1 to August 31 for United States, Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri,

Nebraska, New Mexico, and South Dakota; June 1 to May 31 for Texas; August 1 to July 31 for Arkansas, Georgia,

Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oklahoma.

Soybeans: September 1 to August 31 for United States and all States except Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas; July 1 to

June 30 for Texas; August 1 to July 31 for Louisiana and Mississippi.

Austrian Winter Peas: July 1 to June 30 for United States, Idaho, Montana, and Oregon.

Dry Edible Peas: July 1 to June 30 for United States, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, and Washington.

Lentils: July 1 to June 30 for United States, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, and Washington.

Page 34: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

34 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Dry Edible Peas Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2010 through 2012 [Excludes both wrinkled seed peas and Austrian winter peas]

State 2010 2011 2012

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Idaho ....................................... Montana .................................. North Dakota ........................... Oregon .................................... Washington ............................. United States ..........................

11.10 9.13 9.47

20.70 11.50

9.77

15.40 14.80 15.30 16.00 15.70

15.30

17.50 14.60 15.90 17.00 17.30

15.70

Austrian Winter Peas Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2010 through 2012

State 2010 2011 2012

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Idaho ....................................... Montana .................................. Oregon .................................... United States ..........................

17.70 15.50 20.40

17.10

20.00 20.00 16.20

19.50

19.90 21.90 20.40

20.70

Lentils Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2010 through 2012

State 2010 2011 2012

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Idaho ....................................... Montana .................................. North Dakota ........................... Washington ............................. United States ..........................

27.90 23.90 25.10 30.20

25.70

31.50 23.70 20.40 31.40

25.00

27.80 19.50 18.70 27.20

20.70

Page 35: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 35 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Lentils Prices Received and Farm Marketings by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2010-2011 through 2012-2013 [Marketing year average (MYA) prices are weighted average prices for the United States marketing year of July - June. Monthly farm marketings, based on a sample survey, as percent of total used for calculating MYA prices]

Month Prices received Farm marketing percentages

2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (percent) (percent) (percent)

July ...................... August ................. September ........... October ............... November ............ December ............ January 1 ............. February .............. March .................. April ..................... May ..................... June .................... MYA ....................

27.00 21.30 23.30 25.00 25.60 26.80 28.40 29.20 29.70 28.70 29.50 26.00

25.70

27.30 24.90 29.10 28.70 24.60 24.30 26.80 23.60 22.80 24.90 22.70 20.10

25.00

18.50 18.20 21.20 22.30 21.30 18.90 21.00 22.60 20.20 21.00 20.40 22.00

20.70

1.0 11.9 21.6 11.5 11.5 9.4 7.9 7.7 7.1 5.9 2.1 2.4

100.0

3.0 6.4

11.3 12.5 8.7 6.9 9.5 5.2 8.8 6.8 8.2

12.7

100.0

5.1 9.6

10.3 10.2 6.5 8.5 6.4

12.7 12.7 7.1 5.5 5.4

100.0

1 Second year.

Dry Edible Peas Prices Received and Farm Marketings by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2010-2011 through 2012-2013 [Marketing year average (MYA) prices are weighted average prices for the United States marketing year of July - June. Monthly farm marketings, based on a sample survey, as percent of total used for calculating MYA prices]

Month Prices received Farm marketing percentages

2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (percent) (percent) (percent)

July ...................... August ................. September ........... October ............... November ............ December ............ January 1 ............. February .............. March .................. April ..................... May ..................... June .................... MYA ....................

7.60 8.77 8.69 8.26 9.04

10.20 10.50 12.10 10.90 12.00 12.60 14.00

9.77

12.90 14.60 15.30 16.40 15.90 15.80 15.70 15.30 15.70 16.30 16.50 16.10

15.30

14.80 14.30 14.50 15.30 16.50 16.60 16.30 16.60 17.80 18.70 18.60 19.40

15.70

14.0 20.4 10.5 5.4 6.4 7.2 7.2 3.6 9.1 6.7 4.8 4.7

100.0

13.0 21.3 11.7 10.4 5.7 3.6 7.3 4.0 6.3 8.4 4.3 4.0

100.0

5.4 20.3 17.0 10.5 7.5 7.4

10.0 8.5 6.8 2.9 1.9 1.8

100.0

1 Second year.

Page 36: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

36 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Austrian Winter Peas Prices Received and Farm Marketings by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2010-2011 through 2012-2013 [Marketing year average (MYA) prices are weighted average prices for the United States marketing year of July - June. Monthly farm marketings, based on a sample survey, as percent of total used for calculating MYA prices]

Month Prices received Farm marketing percentages

2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (percent) (percent) (percent)

July ...................... August ................. September ........... October ................ November ............ December ............ January 1 .............. February .............. March ................... April ..................... May ...................... June ..................... MYA .....................

15.80 16.70 16.60 16.80 17.70

(S) (S)

20.00 (S)

18.50 19.00

(S)

17.10

(S) 19.30

(S) 19.70

(S) 19.10 19.90 19.70

(S) (S) (S) (S)

19.50

(S) 20.50 20.90 20.90

(S) 20.60 21.00 21.30

(S) (S) (S)

17.80

20.70

2.2 19.8 28.3 34.1 4.3 (S) (S) 6.5 (S) 0.4 1.2 (S)

100.0

(S) 20.4

(S) 26.8

(S) 5.7

18.9 9.2 (S) (S) (S) (S)

100.0

(S) 8.8

31.8 12.2

(S) 7.9

13.5 15.0

(S) (S) (S) 7.0

100.0

(S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate. 1 Second year.

Corn Prices Received and Farm Marketings by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2010-2011 through 2012-2013 [Marketing year average (MYA) prices are weighted average prices for the United States marketing year of September - August. Monthly farm marketings, based on a sample survey, as percent of total used for calculating MYA prices]

Month Prices received Farm marketing percentages

2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (percent) (percent) (percent)

September ........... October ................ November ............ December ............ January 1 .............. February .............. March ................... April ..................... May ...................... June ..................... July ...................... August ................. MYA .....................

4.08 4.32 4.55 4.82 4.94 5.65 5.53 6.36 6.32 6.38 6.33 6.88

5.18

6.38 5.73 5.83 5.86 6.07 6.28 6.35 6.34 6.34 6.37 7.14 7.63

6.22

6.89 6.78 7.01 6.87 6.96 7.04 7.13 6.97 6.97 6.97 6.79 6.21

6.89

10.7 16.7 8.5 8.2

15.7 6.8 7.4 5.9 4.7 5.3 5.5 4.6

100.0

5.0 13.9 12.6 9.1

15.2 8.1 8.8 5.3 5.1 5.9 5.7 5.3

100.0

11.1 15.8 9.4 7.5

14.0 6.2 8.7 4.9 5.2 5.8 6.0 5.4

100.0

1 Second year.

Page 37: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 37 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Sorghum Grain Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2010 through 2012

State 2010 2011 2012

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Arizona ............................................ Arkansas ......................................... Colorado .......................................... Georgia ........................................... Illinois .............................................. Kansas ............................................ Louisiana ......................................... Mississippi ....................................... Missouri ........................................... Nebraska ......................................... New Mexico ..................................... Oklahoma ........................................ South Dakota ................................... Texas .............................................. United States ...................................

9.10 7.14 9.00 6.65

10.40 9.00 6.90 7.02

10.20 8.74

9.60 9.00 8.56 7.26

8.96

12.50 10.20 10.70 11.70 10.50 10.70 10.20 10.20 11.00 10.50

10.60 10.80 10.20 10.40

10.70

12.80 11.10 12.50 12.70 12.00 12.00 11.50 10.90 12.30 12.10

13.30 12.00 11.90 11.20

11.30

Sorghum Grain Farm Marketing Percent by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 [Monthly farm marketings, based on a sample survey, as a percent of total used for calculating marketing year average prices. Blank cells indicate month is outside State's designated marketing year]

State and Marketing

Year Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

Arkansas 2011-2012 ................................................ 2012-2013 ................................................ Illinois 2011-2012 ................................................ 2012-2013 ................................................ Kansas 2011-2012 ................................................ 2012-2013 ................................................ Louisiana 2011-2012 ................................................ 2012-2013 ................................................ Missouri 2011-2012 ................................................ 2012-2013 ................................................ Nebraska 2011-2012 ................................................ 2012-2013 ................................................ Oklahoma 2011-2012 ................................................ 2012-2013 ................................................ Texas 2011-2012 ................................................ 2012-2013 ................................................ United States 2011-2012 ................................................ 2012-2013 ................................................

35 7

33 39

13 49

61 65

9 19

15 18

48 30

3 4

1 2

14 20

8 7

1 6

4 7

1 4

2.6 6.4

18 4

15 2

11 12

2 6

24 9

20 15

3

10

1 10

8.1 12.2

3 2

38 28

28 25

2 1

14 31

17 13

26 19

3 9

16.4 17.7

8 4

1 9

19 9

2 1

8 11

22 9

21 9

5 4

12.2 6.5

7 5

13 15

13 17

5 4

12 12

13 17

10 12

3 5

8.5 11.1

1 1

1 6

9 6

1 2

3 7

7 8

7 5

1 1

5.2 3.5

1 1

2 10

7

12

1 -

14 6

8 10

11 8

1 2

4.4 6.5

- 3

22 20

4 4

- -

4 3

2 6

4 2

1 -

2.7 2.5

- -

- 2

3 4

- -

- 4

3 6

1 3

1 1

1.6 2.0

- 1

- 3

2 4

- -

6 4

3 5

1 4

4.2 5.2

1 -

- 1

2 3

12 1

- 4

3 2

3 2

19.4 10.6

5

1 2

7 2

1 3

14.7 15.8

- Represents zero.

Page 38: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

38 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Sorghum Grain Prices Received by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013

State 2011-2012

June July August September October November December January 1

(dollars per

cwt) (dollars per

cwt) (dollars per

cwt) (dollars per

cwt) (dollars per

cwt) (dollars per

cwt) (dollars per

cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Arkansas .................... Illinois ......................... Kansas ....................... Louisiana ................... Missouri ..................... Nebraska ................... Oklahoma .................. Texas ......................... United States .............

(S) 11.60 12.00

(S) (D)

12.30 12.30 10.00

10.50

(S) 12.20 11.60

(D) 12.10 12.40 11.10 10.30

10.40

10.90 (D)

12.20 10.10

(D) 11.70 11.80 10.60

10.70

10.10 (S)

11.60 10.20 10.20 11.50 11.90 12.10

10.50

9.71 10.30 10.70

(D) 11.30 10.70 10.40 10.90

10.70

9.74 10.20 10.70

(D) 10.70 10.40 10.20 10.70

10.70

(D) (D)

10.50 (D)

10.80 9.74

10.50 11.80

10.50

11.00 11.70 10.80

(D) 10.90 10.20 10.80 11.40

10.80

State 2012-2013

June July August September October November December January 1

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

Arkansas .................... Illinois ......................... Kansas ....................... Louisiana ................... Missouri ..................... Nebraska ................... Oklahoma .................. Texas ......................... United States .............

(S) (D)

10.40 (S) (D)

10.90 11.10 9.23

9.56

(D) (S)

12.50 11.10

(S) 12.00 12.20 10.50

10.60

11.10 (D)

13.30 11.60 12.90 12.20 12.80 10.90

11.30

11.00 12.80 12.40 11.30 11.80 11.70 11.80 11.50

11.50

10.10 (D)

12.20 10.90 11.90 12.40 12.00 12.70

12.40

(D) 11.40 12.30

(D) 12.40 12.20 12.10 12.80

12.40

(D) 11.40 12.10

(D) 12.30 11.70 11.70 12.50

12.20

11.00 11.80 12.20

(D) 11.90 12.20 11.80 11.70

12.00

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued

Page 39: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 39 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Sorghum Grain Prices Received by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 (continued)

State 2011-2012

February March April May June July August

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Arkansas ..................... Illinois .......................... Kansas ........................ Louisiana ..................... Missouri ....................... Nebraska ..................... Oklahoma .................... Texas .......................... United States ...............

(D) (D)

10.80 (D)

10.70 10.60 10.90 11.20

10.80

(D) (D)

10.90 (D)

10.90 10.90 11.20 11.40

10.90

(D) (D)

10.60 (D) (D)

10.90 10.90 11.60

10.60

(S) (D)

10.30 (S) (S)

10.90 10.40 11.50

10.40

(S) (D)

10.40 (S) (D)

10.90 11.10 9.23

9.56

(D) (S)

12.50 11.10

(S) 12.00 12.20 10.50

10.60

11.10 (D)

13.30 11.60 12.90 12.20 12.80 10.90

11.30

State 2012-2013

February March April May June July August

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Arkansas ..................... Illinois .......................... Kansas ........................ Louisiana ..................... Missouri ....................... Nebraska ..................... Oklahoma .................... Texas .......................... United States ...............

(D) 12.30 12.10

(D) 12.80 12.20 11.70 12.20

12.10

(D) 12.40 12.20

(D) 12.70 12.50 12.00 11.80

12.20

(D) 12.90 11.20

(D) 11.90

(D) 11.20 10.70

11.60

(D) (D)

11.30 (D) (D)

12.00 11.10 11.50

11.40

(D) 11.90 11.80

(D) (D)

12.40 11.40

(D)

11.10

(S) (D)

10.60 (D)

12.50 11.50 10.80 9.48

9.63

(D) (D)

9.88 8.85

11.90 10.20 8.81 8.68

8.82

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate. 1 Second year.

Page 40: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

40 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Soybean Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2010 through 2012

State 2010 2011 2012

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Alabama ......................................... Arkansas ......................................... Delaware ........................................ Florida ............................................. Georgia ........................................... Illinois .............................................. Indiana ............................................ Iowa ................................................ Kansas ............................................ Kentucky ......................................... Louisiana ........................................ Maryland ......................................... Michigan ......................................... Minnesota ....................................... Mississippi ...................................... Missouri .......................................... Nebraska ........................................ New Jersey ..................................... New York ........................................ North Carolina ................................. North Dakota ................................... Ohio ................................................ Oklahoma ....................................... Pennsylvania .................................. South Carolina ................................ South Dakota .................................. Tennessee ...................................... Texas .............................................. Virginia ............................................ West Virginia ................................... Wisconsin ....................................... United States ..................................

11.10 10.90 12.20 11.00 11.70 11.80 11.50 11.20 11.50 11.40

10.50 12.00 11.10 10.90 10.40 11.70 11.00 11.70 11.40 12.00

10.90 11.50 11.40 12.10 11.80 10.90 11.10 10.40 12.00 12.00 10.80

11.30

12.00 12.30 12.20 11.00 12.10 12.80 12.70 12.60 12.10 12.40

12.00 12.10 12.10 12.40 12.00 12.50 12.00 12.10 12.30 12.10

11.90 13.00 11.90 12.50 12.00 12.20 12.20 12.00 12.10 12.40 12.40

12.50

14.60 14.30 14.40 14.00 14.60 14.60 14.70 14.40 14.30 14.50

14.70 14.20 14.00 14.30 14.50 14.50 14.10 13.90 13.60 14.00

14.00 14.60 14.40 14.20 14.50 14.20 14.60 14.60 14.00 14.30 14.00

14.40

Page 41: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 41 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Soybean Prices Received by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013

State 2011-2012

August September October November December January 1 February

(dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel) (dollars per

bushel)

Arkansas .................... Illinois ......................... Indiana ....................... Iowa ............................ Kansas ....................... Kentucky ..................... Louisiana .................... Michigan ..................... Minnesota ................... Mississippi .................. Missouri ...................... Nebraska .................... North Carolina ............ North Dakota .............. Ohio ............................ South Dakota .............. Tennessee .................. Wisconsin ................... United States ..............

13.20 13.70 13.70 13.50 13.50 13.50 11.80 13.30 13.00 13.60

13.70 13.30 14.00 12.80 13.60 13.00 13.00 13.40

13.40

11.80 12.80 12.90 12.60 12.10 12.60 12.00 13.00 11.90 11.80

12.70 11.70 13.30 11.60 13.50 11.50 11.70 13.40

12.20

12.00 11.90 11.80 11.80 11.60 12.00 12.00 11.60 11.50 11.80

11.90 11.70 11.90 11.40 11.90 11.50 11.90 11.70

11.80

12.10 11.90 11.80 11.60 11.30 12.10 11.90 11.50 11.50 11.90

11.80 11.50 11.40 11.20 11.80 11.50 12.10 11.90

11.70

11.80 11.80 11.90 11.30 11.00 11.70 11.70 11.20 11.20 12.00

11.80 11.20 11.30 11.10 11.80 11.10 12.00 11.40

11.50

12.20 12.10 12.20 11.80 11.50 12.30 12.20 11.70 11.70 11.90

12.00 11.40 11.80 11.30 12.20 11.60 12.10 11.90

11.90

12.40 12.40 12.50 12.10 12.00 12.50 12.60 12.10 12.00 12.30

12.40 11.90 12.40 11.70 12.60 12.00 12.40 12.20

12.20

State 2012-2013

August September October November December January 1 February

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

Arkansas .................... Illinois ......................... Indiana ....................... Iowa ............................ Kansas ....................... Kentucky ..................... Louisiana .................... Michigan ..................... Minnesota ................... Mississippi .................. Missouri ...................... Nebraska .................... North Carolina ............ North Dakota .............. Ohio ............................ South Dakota .............. Tennessee .................. Wisconsin ................... United States ..............

14.70 16.70 16.40 16.80 16.60 16.40 13.90 15.90 16.60

(D)

16.90 16.60 17.00 15.40 16.50 16.00 15.00 16.60

16.20

14.10 15.20 14.80 14.40 14.40 14.80 15.00 13.60 14.20 14.30

15.30 13.70 16.20 14.20 14.80 14.20 14.30 13.50

14.30

14.30 14.40 14.50 14.10 14.30 14.30 14.80 14.00 14.10 13.90

14.40 14.00 14.30 13.90 14.30 13.80 14.50 13.90

14.20

14.50 14.70 14.60 14.30 14.10 14.40 14.50 13.80 14.10 14.40

14.30 14.00 13.80 13.90 14.30 14.20 14.50 14.10

14.30

14.60 14.30 14.50 14.30 14.10 14.50 14.50 14.10 14.10 14.80

14.30 14.20 13.70 14.10 14.50 14.20 14.90 14.00

14.30

14.50 14.30 14.60 14.10 14.00 14.50 15.40 13.50 14.20 14.70

14.30 13.90 14.00 13.80 14.60 13.90 14.50 13.90

14.30

14.90 14.70 14.80 14.60 14.50 14.60 14.70 13.60 14.40 15.90

14.80 14.40 14.20 14.10 14.80 14.40 15.10 14.40

14.60

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued

Page 42: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

42 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Soybean Prices Received by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 (continued)

State 2011-2012

March April May June July August

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Arkansas ....................... Illinois ............................ Indiana .......................... Iowa .............................. Kansas .......................... Kentucky ....................... Louisiana ...................... Michigan ....................... Minnesota ..................... Mississippi .................... Missouri ........................ Nebraska ...................... North Carolina ............... North Dakota ................. Ohio .............................. South Dakota ................ Tennessee .................... Wisconsin ..................... United States ................

13.20 13.10 13.10 12.80 12.90 13.10 12.90 12.90 12.80 13.10

13.10 12.70 13.30 12.60 13.50 12.80 13.40 12.90

13.00

14.00 14.10 14.00 13.60 13.60 14.20 13.90 13.70 13.70 13.60

13.90 13.60 14.00 13.20 13.70 13.70 14.10 13.40

13.80

13.80 14.30 14.10 13.80 13.70 14.50 13.60 13.70 13.70

(D)

14.10 13.80 14.10 13.60 14.30 13.30 14.30 13.70

14.00

14.30 14.10 14.10 13.70 13.90 13.80

(D) 13.90 13.60 14.00

14.10 13.60 14.50 13.50 14.20 13.50 13.60 14.10

13.90

16.50 15.60 15.90 15.00 15.50 16.40 14.20 15.50 15.20

(D)

16.20 15.30 15.70 14.70 15.70 14.90 15.60 14.80

15.40

14.70 16.70 16.40 16.80 16.60 16.40 13.90 15.90 16.60

(D)

16.90 16.60 17.00 15.40 16.50 16.00 15.00 16.60

16.20

State 2012-2013

March April May June July August

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Arkansas ....................... Illinois ............................ Indiana .......................... Iowa .............................. Kansas .......................... Kentucky ....................... Louisiana ...................... Michigan ....................... Minnesota ..................... Mississippi .................... Missouri ........................ Nebraska ...................... North Carolina ............... North Dakota ................. Ohio .............................. South Dakota ................ Tennessee .................... Wisconsin ..................... United States ................

14.10 14.70 15.00 14.60 14.40 15.00 14.00 14.20 14.40 14.00

14.80 14.40 14.20 13.90 14.80 14.30 14.90 14.40

14.60

14.20 14.60 14.70 14.40 14.00 14.60 14.40 13.80 14.20 14.50

14.40 14.10 14.40 13.50 14.50 14.00 14.60 14.10

14.40

15.00 15.10 15.10 14.90 14.60 15.10 15.10 14.50 14.70

(D)

14.80 14.70 15.00 14.00 14.90 14.60 15.00 14.60

14.90

15.20 15.50 15.60 15.20 14.90 15.50 15.90 15.00 14.80 15.60

15.30 15.00 15.00 14.40 15.30 14.70 15.50 14.90

15.10

14.80 15.50 15.80 15.40 15.00

(D) (D)

15.00 15.00 14.10

15.50 15.10 14.70 14.30 15.70 14.90

(D) 15.10

15.30

(D) 14.20 14.90 14.20 13.90 13.60

(D) 14.40 14.30 12.70

13.70 13.50 14.20 13.10 14.60 13.80 13.20 14.40

14.10

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1 Second year.

Page 43: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 43 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Soybean Farm Marketing Percent by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 [Monthly farm marketings, based on a sample survey, as a percent of total used for calculating marketing year average prices. Blank cells indicate month is outside State's designated marketing year]

State and Marketing

Year Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

Arkansas 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Illinois 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Indiana 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Iowa 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Kansas 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Kentucky 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Louisiana 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Michigan 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Minnesota 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Mississippi 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Missouri 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Nebraska 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. North Carolina 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. North Dakota 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Ohio 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. South Dakota 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Tennessee 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. Wisconsin 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 .................................................. United States 2011-2012 .................................................. 2012-2013 ..................................................

11 14

2 3

9

16

2 4

3 6

3 11

3 4

1 4

33 29

1 7

6 24

20 24

4 3

5 14

1 1

5 23

1 5

4 23

4 8

1 14

3.8 11.7

26 36

15 20

28 31

27 20

27 28

17 16

22 22

34 40

22 14

22 17

24 23

31 29

9 7

24 14

17 24

29 14

38 27

32 37

23.8 22.3

27 17

5 9

8 8

4 9

11 11

19 13

8 8

14 11

6 4

10 7

12 15

7 5

28 27

8 6

13 8

4 4

23 23

10 7

8.8 8.7

10 13

10 10

5 7

6 5

14 10

11 9

8 14

8 5

7 7

22 33

10 8

12 12

20 19

9

15

8 9

7 11

9 11

5 4

8.5 9.3

13 8

24 23

15 15

12 12

11 17

28 36

9 9

12 11

13 13

14 7

15 15

13 14

17 21

14 16

12 23

11 12

13 16

13 12

15.0 15.9

3 3

12 9

11 7

11 7

12 7

10 6

5 2

10 6

11 6

6 5

11 7

13 6

8 6

16 7

12 8

14 9

3 6

8 6

11.1 7.1

2 1

9 4

9 5

11 8

8 5

6 5

2 1

9 3

9 5

2 1

10 6

7 5

5 6

9 4

10 5

10 4

3 2

6 5

8.7 5.0

1 1

7 5

5 5

9 6

5 5

3 3

1 1

5 3

6 5

1 1

6 6

5 3

4 3

4 3

7 5

7 4

2 2

9 3

5.9 4.3

- 1

4 7

5 6

3 9

2 5

1 4

- -

3 5

4 6

- 1

2 7

1 5

3 3

3 3

4 5

4 5

1 2

1 5

3.0 5.9

1 -

5 3

4 3

4 5

1 3

1 2

- -

2 4

7 6

- 1

2 5

2 3

1 2

4 3

5 3

4 4

1 1

13 3

4.2 3.6

1 1

5 4

4 4

6 5

3 3

2 1

1 -

1 3

6 8

1 -

3 3

2 3

1 2

3 4

6 3

3 7

2 1

1 3

4.0 3.9

7 3

2 2

3 3

4 3

3 2

1 1

1 2

3 2

1 2

2 1

3 3

1 2

5 2

3 3

1 1

1 1

3.2 2.3

- Represents zero.

Page 44: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

44 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Reliability of Prices Received Estimates

Definition: Prices received represent sales from producers to first buyers. They include all grades and qualities. The

average commodity price from the survey multiplied by the total quantity marketed theoretically should give the total cash

receipts for the commodity.

Survey procedures: Primary sales data used to determine grain prices were obtained from probability samples of about

1900 mills and elevators. These procedures ensure that virtually all grain moving into commercial channels has a chance

of being included in the survey. Generally, States surveyed account for 90 percent or more of total United States

production. Livestock prices are obtained from packers, stockyards, auctions, dealers, and market check data from

AMS-USDA, private marketing organizations, and state commodity groups and agencies. Inter-farm sales of grain and

livestock are not included since they represent very small percentages of the total sales. Grain marketed for seed is also

excluded. Fruit and vegetable prices are obtained from sample surveys and market check data from AMS-USDA, private

marketing organizations, state agencies, and universities.

Summary and estimation procedures: Survey quantities sold are expanded by strata to state levels and used to weight

average strata prices to a state average. State prices are then weighted to a United States price based on expanded sales.

Recommendations are prepared by the State Field Offices and reviewed by the Agricultural Statistics Board in

Washington, D.C. State recommendations are reviewed for reasonableness with survey data, other States, and recent

historic estimates.

Revisions: For most items, the current month's preliminary price represents a 3-5 day period around the 15th of the

month. Previous month's prices represent actual dollars received for quantities sold during the entire month. Revisions are

published in monthly issues of Agricultural Prices.

Reliability: United States price estimates based on probability surveys generally have a sampling error of less than one

percent for the major commodities such as corn, wheat, soybeans, cotton, and rice. Current methods of summarization for

non-probability commodities are not designed directly to calculate sampling errors. However, analytical measures

approximate the United States relative sampling errors at around five percent. Any non-sampling errors are attributed to

such things as the inability to obtain correct information, differences in interpreting questions or definitions, mistakes in

coding or processing the data, etc. Efforts are made at each step in the survey process to minimize these non-sampling

errors.

Page 45: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 45 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Paid by Farmers

The September Index of Prices Paid for Commodities and Services, Interest, Taxes, and Farm Wage Rates (PPITW), at

213 (1990-1992=100), is down 1.4 percent from August and down 1.8 percent from September 2012.

Production index: The September index, at 224, decreased 2.2 percent from last month and 3.4 percent from last year.

Lower prices in September for concentrates, nitrogen, feed grains, and mixed fertilizer more than offset higher prices for

feeder cattle, diesel, LP gas, and feeder pigs.

Feed: The September index, at 237, decreased 7.1 percent from August and decreased 17 percent from last September.

Since August, prices for concentrates, feed grains, complete feeds, supplements, and hay & forages are lower.

Livestock and poultry: The September index, at 174, increased 1.8 percent from last month and 11 percent from last

year. Since August, prices for feeder cattle and feeder pigs are higher. The September feeder cattle price, at $153.90 per

cwt, is up $2.20 per cwt from the August price. September feeder pigs averaged $142.00 per cwt, up $8.00 per cwt from

August.

Fertilizer: The September index, at 251, is down 10 percent from August and 22 percent below September a year ago.

Since August, prices for nitrogen, mixed fertilizer, and potash & phosphate are lower.

Chemicals: The September index, at 157, decreased 0.6 percent from August but increased 1.9 percent from last

September. Compared with last month, prices for herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides/other are lower.

Fuels: The September index, at 366, is up 1.7 percent from a month earlier but 1.3 percent below September 2012.

Compared with last month, prices are higher for diesel and LP gas but lower for gasoline.

Machinery: The September index, at 263, is unchanged from August but 1.5 percent above last September. Compared

with last month, prices for self-propelled machinery are lower.

Consumer price index: The August 2013 Consumer Price Index, as issued by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all

urban consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.1 percent before seasonal adjustment to a level of 233.877 (1982-1984=100). The

July index is 233.596. For the 12 month period ending in August, the overall index increased 1.5 percent.

Page 46: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

46 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Paid Indexes and Related Parity Ratios – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons [Revised historical price indexes for months not shown are available at www.nass.usda.gov]

Indexes and

ratios

1910-1914 Base 1990-1992 Base

September 2012

August 2013

September 2013

September 2012

August 2013

September 2013

(percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent)

Prices paid by farmers for commodities, services, interest, taxes, and wage rates (PPITW) ......................................... Production ........................................... Feed ............................................... Livestock and poultry ....................... Seeds .............................................. Fertilizer .......................................... Chemicals ....................................... Fuels ............................................... Supplies and repairs ....................... Autos and trucks ............................. Machinery ....................................... Building materials ............................ Services and rent ............................ Services .......................................... Rent ................................................ Interest 1 ............................................. Taxes 2 ................................................ Wage rates ......................................... Production, interest, taxes, and wage rates (PITW) ................... Family living-CPI 3 ...............................

2892 2252 1393 2004 3606 1180 954

2859 1220

3124 6493 2396 2193 (NA) (NA)

3684 6080 7340

3029 2198

2881 2220 1244 2186 3776 1028 974

2779 1222

3170 6603 2438 2245 (NA) (NA)

3594 6273 7696

3008 2221

2831 2169 1155 2221 3776 922 972

2827 1219

3161 6585 2442 2246 (NA) (NA)

3594 6273 7696

2948 2224

217 232 285 157 364 322 154 371 172

117 259 176

(NA) 168 212

147 227 196

225 172

216 229 255 171 381 280 158 360 172

119 263 179

(NA) 172 217

143 234 206

224 173

213 224 237 174 381 251 157 366 172

119 263 180

(NA) 172 217

143 234 206

219 174

Ratio (received/paid) ........................... Parity ratio 4 ........................................ Parity ratio adjusted 5 .......................... PPITW adjusted for productivity 6 ....................................

(NA) 43 44

1500

(NA) 42 43

1486

(NA) 42 43

1479

90 (NA) (NA)

(NA)

88 (NA) (NA)

(NA)

87 (NA) (NA)

(NA)

Crop sector (PPITW) ........................... Livestock sector (PPITW) ....................

(NA) (NA)

(NA) (NA)

(NA) (NA)

222 212

223 209

220 205

Farm sector (production) ..................... Non-farm sector (production) ...............

(NA) (NA)

(NA) (NA)

(NA) (NA)

256 219

250 217

242 213

(NA) Not available. 1 Interest per acre on farm real estate debt and interest rate on farm non-real estate debt. 2 Farm real estate taxes payable per acre. 3 Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (CPI-U), for the previous month converted by the USDA. 4 Ratio of index of prices received to PPITW (1910-1914=100). 5 Based on estimated cash receipts, from marketings and government payments, the preliminary adjustment factor is 1.044 for 2013 and the

revised factor is 1.041 for 2012. 6 PPITW is adjusted based on productivity trend for the prior 15 years.

Page 47: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 47 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Paid Indexes and Annual Weights for Input Components and Sub-components – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons [Revised historical price indexes for months not shown are available at www.nass.usda.gov. Relative weights are a five year moving average]

Relative weights Indexes (1990-1992=100)

2012 2013 September

2012 August 2013

September 2013

(percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent)

Production items ................................................... Feed ................................................................. Feed grains ................................................... Complete feeds ............................................. Hay and forages ........................................... Concentrates ................................................ Supplements ................................................. Livestock and poultry ........................................ Feeder cattle ................................................. Feeder pigs ................................................... Milk cow replacements .................................. Poultry .......................................................... Seeds ............................................................... Field crops .................................................... Grasses and legumes ................................... Fertilizer ............................................................ Mixed fertilizer ............................................... Nitrogen ........................................................ Potash and phosphate .................................. Chemicals ......................................................... Herbicides ..................................................... Insecticides ................................................... Fungicides and other .................................... Fuels ................................................................ Diesel ........................................................... Gasoline ....................................................... LP gas .......................................................... Supplies and repairs ......................................... Supplies ........................................................ Repairs ......................................................... Autos and trucks ............................................... Autos ............................................................ Trucks ........................................................... Machinery ......................................................... Tractors ........................................................ Self-propelled ................................................ Other machinery ........................................... Building materials ............................................. Services ............................................................ Custom rates ................................................ Other services ............................................... Rent .................................................................. Cash ............................................................. Share ............................................................ Interest ................................................................. Taxes ................................................................... Wage rates ........................................................... Family living-CPI ...................................................

71.1

12.7 1.8 6.2 1.6 2.0 1.1 8.3 6.5 0.7 0.7 0.5

4.3 3.9 0.4 5.7 2.5 2.4 0.8 3.2 2.0 0.7 0.5

4.0 2.5 0.8 0.7 4.6 1.5 3.0 1.2 0.2 1.1

4.3 0.9 1.7 1.6 4.2

12.0 1.2

10.7 6.6 3.5 3.0

3.4 3.1 7.2

15.3

71.9

13.4 1.9 6.6 1.7 2.1 1.1 8.0 6.3 0.6 0.7 0.5

4.4 4.0 0.4 6.1 2.7 2.6 0.9 3.2 2.0 0.7 0.5

4.0 2.5 0.8 0.7 4.5 1.5 3.0 1.2 0.2 1.1

4.5 1.0 1.8 1.7 4.1

11.7 1.2

10.5 6.7 3.6 3.1

3.2 3.1 6.9

15.0

232

285 294 290 239 297 288 157 171 46

126 166

364 384 178 322 286 340 382 154 139 177 185

371 419 333 238 172 167 174 117 115 118

259 214 274 268 176 168 157 170 212 270 145

147 227 196 172

229

255 261 264 234 252 229 171 179 146 121 166

381 402 184 280 268 278 328 158 141 184 190

360 391 309 311 172 167 175 119 116 120

263 216 280 273 179 172 157 174 217 278 147

143 234 206 173

224

237 225 259 227 194 218 174 182 155 121 166

381 402 184 251 246 238 311 157 140 183 190

366 397 306 327 172 167 174 119 115 119

263 216 278 273 180 172 157 174 217 278 147

143 234 206 174

Page 48: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

48 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Percent

Paid Indexes by Month, All Items and Production Items – United States: 1990-1992=100

All Items Production Items

30

80

130

180

230

280

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Percent

Paid Indexes, Annual Averages, Production Items, Interest, Taxes, and Wages – United States: 1990-1992=100

Production Items Interest Taxes Wages

Page 49: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 49 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Percent

Paid Indexes by Farm Type and Month, All Items – United States: 1990-1992=100

All Farms Crop Farms Livestock Farms

90

110

130

150

170

190

210

230

250

270

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Percent

Paid Indexes by Origin and Month, All Production Items – United States: 1990-1992=100

All Nonfarm Farm

Page 50: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

50 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

0

100

200

300

400

500

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Percent

Paid Indexes by Non-Farm Sector and Month, Supplies & Repairs, Fertilizer, Machinery, and Fuel – United States: 1990-1992=100

Supplies & Repairs Fertilizer Machinery Fuel

50

100

150

200

250

300

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Percent

Paid Indexes by Month, Feed and Livestock & Poultry – United States: 1990-1992=100

Feed Livestock & Poultry

Page 51: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 51 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Feed Price Ratios – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons

Feed price ratio 1 September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

Broiler-feed: pounds of broiler grower feed equal in value to 1 pound of broiler, live weight 2 .......................................................... Market egg feed: pounds of laying feed equal in value to 1 dozen eggs 3 ....................................................................................... Hog-corn: bushels of corn equal in value to 100 pounds of hog, live weight ............................................................................ Milk-feed: pounds of 16% mixed dairy feed equal in value to 1 pound of whole milk 4 ...................................................................... Steer and heifer-corn: bushels of corn equal in value to 100 pounds of steer & heifers, live weight ....................................................... Turkey-feed: pounds of turkey grower equal in value to 1 pound of turkey, live weight 5 ..............................................................

2.8

7.0

8.1

1.59

18.1

4.8

3.3

6.1

11.9

1.68

20.1

4.6

3.5

6.4

13.1

1.86

23.9

4.9 1 Effective January 1995, prices of commercial prepared feeds are based on current United States prices received for corn, soybeans, alfalfa hay, and

all wheat. 2 The price of commercial prepared broiler feed is based on current United States prices received for corn and soybeans. The modeled feed uses

58 percent corn and 42 percent soybeans. 3 The price of commercial prepared layer feed is based on current United States prices received for corn and soybeans. The modeled feed uses

75 percent corn and 25 percent soybeans. 4 The price of commercial prepared dairy feed is based on current United States prices received for corn, soybeans, and alfalfa hay. The modeled feed

uses 51 percent corn, 41 percent alfalfa hay, and 8 percent soybeans. 5 The price of commercial prepared turkey feed is based on current United States prices received for corn, soybeans, and wheat. The modeled feed

uses 51 percent corn, 28 percent soybeans, and 21 percent wheat.

Prices Received Used to Calculate Feed Price Ratios – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons [Price data source for livestock and poultry commodities is United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Marketing Service]

Item September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Broilers, live ........................................................... pound Eggs, market ......................................................... dozen Hogs, all .................................................................... cwt Milk, all ...................................................................... cwt Steers and heifers ..................................................... cwt Turkeys, live .......................................................... pound Corn ..................................................................... bushel Hay, alfalfa ................................................................. ton Soybeans ............................................................. bushel Wheat, all ............................................................. bushel

0.480 1.060

55.70 19.70

125.00 0.762

6.89

206.00

14.30 8.27

0.530 0.870

74.20 19.50

125.00 0.674

6.21

200.00

14.10 6.87

0.530 0.823

69.20 19.80

126.00 0.667

5.28

194.00

13.80 6.75

Prices Paid for Feeder Livestock – United States: September 2013 with Comparisons [Price data source is United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Marketing Service]

Item September 2012 August 2013 Preliminary

September 2013

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Feeder cattle and calves ............................................ cwt Feeder pigs ............................................................... cwt

144.60 42.00

151.70 134.00

153.90 142.00

Page 52: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

52 Agricultural Prices (September 2013) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Reliability of Prices Paid Estimates

Definition: Prices paid by farmers represent the average costs of inputs purchased by farmers and ranchers to produce

agricultural commodities. Conceptually, the average price when multiplied by quantity purchased should equal total

producer expenditures for the item.

Survey procedures: The prices paid data are obtained from establishments that sell goods and services to farmers and

ranchers. Annually, about 8,500 firms are randomly selected from lists by type of item sold with an average response rate

in the range of 75-80 percent. Firms are asked to report the price for the specified item "most commonly bought by

farmers" or that was the "volume seller". Approximately 135 items are surveyed each March to represent all production

input items purchased. The survey reference period for most items is the five business days centered at the 15th of the

month. Separate prices paid surveys are conducted for agricultural chemicals, fuels, feed, fertilizer, machinery, and seed.

Summary and estimation procedures: The annual March Prices Paid Survey is summarized as a non-probability survey.

Average prices reported are aggregated to the region and United States level using weights available from expenditure

data and other administrative sources. Price recommendations are prepared by the State Field Offices and Headquarters

for review by the Agricultural Statistics Board in Washington, D.C. Also, the change in price level for individual items

surveyed are combined to the regional and United States levels, and are published as prices paid indexes referenced to a

specific base period. Prices paid indexes for new autos and trucks, building materials, farm supplies, motor supplies, and

marketing containers are updated based on price changes measured in selected Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) indexes.

Revisions: Any revisions are published in the monthly and in annual issues of Agricultural Prices. The basis for revision

must be supported by additional data that directly affect the level of the estimate. More revisions are likely for March

when separate prices paid surveys are conducted, in lieu of BLS indexes, by the USDA to measure price change.

Reliability: Current methods of summarization for the March data are not designed directly to calculate sampling errors.

However, analytical measures approximate the United States relative sampling errors for major items around 10 percent.

Any non-sampling errors are attributed to such things as the inability to obtain correct information, differences in

interpreting questions or definitions, mistakes in coding or processing the data, etc. Efforts are made at each step in the

survey process to minimize these non-sampling errors.

Program change: Effective January 1, 1995, the National Agricultural Statistics Service updated the weights and

changed the construction of its prices paid and received by farmers’ indexes. A Federal Register Notice dated

October 28, 1994 discussed these program modifications.

A 1990-1992 reference and base period replaced the 1977 reference and 1971-1973 base weight period. Five-year moving

average weights replaced the current fixed 1971-1973 base period weights. The 1910-1914=100 price indexes, required by

statute for computing parity prices, were linked forward based on the changes in the new 1990-1992=100 indexes. The

new indexes were constructed by multiplying the ratios of the current prices to the base period prices by the moving

average weights (adjusted for seasonal marketing patterns for the prices received indexes).

Page 53: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Prices (September 2013) 53 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Information Contacts General Troy Joshua, Chief, Environmental, Economics and Demographics Branch .................................................. (202) 720-6146 Below are the commodity specialists to contact for additional information. Crop Prices Received Lance Honig, Chief, Crops Branch ................................................................................................................. (202) 720-2127 Anthony Prillaman, Head, Field Crops Section ............................................................................................... (202) 720-2127 Angie Considine – Peanuts, Rice ................................................................................................................... (202) 720-7688 Brent Chittenden – Oats, Rye, Wheat ........................................................................................................... (202) 720-8068 Angie Considine – Cotton, Cotton Ginnings, Sorghum ................................................................................. (202) 720-7688 Chris Hawthorn – Corn, Proso Millet, Flaxseed ............................................................................................ (202) 720-9526 Anthony Prillaman – Crop Weather, Barley, Hay ......................................................................................... (202) 720-2127 Travis Thorson – Soybeans, Sunflower, Other Oilseeds ............................................................................... (202) 720-7369 Jorge Garcia-Pratts, Head, Fruits, Vegetables and Special Crops Section....................................................... (202) 720-2127 Debbie Flippin – Fresh and Processing Vegetables, Onions, Strawberries ................................................... (202) 720-2157 Fred Granja – Apples, Apricots, Cherries, Plums, Prunes, Tobacco ............................................................ (202) 720-4288 Jorge Garcia-Pratts – Floriculture, Maple Syrup, Nursery, Tree Nuts .......................................................... (202) 720-2127 Lakeya Jones – Citrus, Coffee, Sugar Crops, Grapes, Tropical Fruits .......................................................... (202) 720-5412 Daphne Schauber – Berries, Cranberries, Potatoes, Sweet Potatoes ............................................................ (202) 720-4285 Dan Norris – Austrian Winter Peas, Dry Edible Peas, Lentils, Mints, Mushrooms, Peaches, Pears, Wrinkled Seed Peas, Dry Beans ................................................................................................................. (202) 720-3250 Livestock Prices Received Dan Kerestes, Chief, Livestock Branch ........................................................................................................... (202) 720-3570 Scott Hollis, Head, Livestock Section ............................................................................................................. (202) 720-3570 Travis Averill – Cattle.................................................................................................................................... (202) 720-3040 Mike Miller – Milk, Milk Cows .................................................................................................................... (202) 720-3278 Doug Bounds – Hogs ..................................................................................................................................... (202) 720-3106 Alissa Cowell-Mytar – Sheep, Lambs, and Goats ......................................................................................... (202) 720-4751 Bruce Boess, Head, Poultry and Specialty Commodities Section ................................................................... (202) 720-3570 Cody Brokmeyer – Turkeys ........................................................................................................................... (202) 690-3237 Tom Kruchten – Honey ................................................................................................................................. (202) 690-4870 Kim Linonis – Eggs ....................................................................................................................................... (202) 690-8632 Miste Salmon – Broilers ................................................................................................................................ (202) 720-3244 Indexes, Prices Paid, and Parity Prices Troy Joshua, Chief, Environmental, Economics and Demographics Branch ................................................................................................................................... (202) 720-6146 Tony Dorn, Head, Economics Section ............................................................................................................. (202) 690-3223 Daryl Brinkman – Prices Received Indexes, Parity Prices ............................................................................ (202) 720-8844 Chris Dickerson – Prices Received Indexes, Parity Prices, Grazing Fees ..................................................... (202) 690-1348 Vincent Davis – Prices Paid Indexes, Prices Paid for Feed, Fertilizer, Agricultural Chemicals, Seeds, Farm Supplies and Repairs, Farm Machinery, Fuels, Feeder Livestock, Poultry Chicks, Feed Price Ratios, Autos & Trucks ............................................................................................................. (202) 690-3229

Page 54: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

Access to NASS Reports For your convenience, you may access NASS reports and products the following ways:

All reports are available electronically, at no cost, on the NASS web site: http://www.nass.usda.gov

Both national and state specific reports are available via a free e-mail subscription. To set-up this free

subscription, visit http://www.nass.usda.gov and in the “Follow NASS” box under “Receive reports by Email,”

click on “National” or “State” to select the reports you would like to receive.

For more information on NASS surveys and reports, call the NASS Agricultural Statistics Hotline at (800) 727-9540,

7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail: [email protected].

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for

employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where

applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's

income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program

or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or

employment activities.)

If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination

Complaint Form (PDF), found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or

call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the

form. Send your completed complaint form or letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of

Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, by fax (202) 690-7442 or email at

[email protected].

Page 55: Agricultural Prices 09/27/2013 - Cornell University...2013/09/27  · Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 27, 2013, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service

USDA Data Users’ Meeting Monday, October 21, 2013

Crowne Plaza Chicago-Metro

Chicago, Illinois 60661

312-829-5000

The USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service will be organizing an open forum for data users.

The purpose will be to provide updates on pending changes in the various statistical and information

programs and seek comments and input from data users. Other USDA agencies to be represented will

include the Agricultural Marketing Service, the Economic Research Service, the Foreign Agricultural

Service, and the World Agricultural Outlook Board. The Foreign Trade Division from the Census

Bureau will also be included in the meeting.

For registration details or additional information for the Data Users’ Meeting, see the NASS homepage

at http://www.nass.usda.gov/meeting/ or contact Rose Armstrong (NASS) at 202-690-8141 or at

[email protected].

This Data Users’ Meeting precedes the Industry Outlook Conference that will be held at the same

location on Tuesday, October 22, 2013. The outlook meeting brings together analysts from various

commodity sectors to discuss the outlook situation. For registration details or additional information for

the Industry Outlook Conference, see the conference webpage on the LMIC website:

http://www.lmic.info/IOC/. Or call the Livestock Marketing Information Center (LMIC) at 303-236-

0460.