24
Agents and Multiagent Systems Chapter 6 Dr Ahmed Rafea

Agents and Multiagent Systems

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    11

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Agents and Multiagent Systems

Chapter 6Dr Ahmed Rafea

Page 2: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Transition from AI to IA

• There are many alternative artificial intelligence techniques for knowledge representation , reasoning and learning.

• The specific functions and requirements of an intelligent agent are the prime determinant of which AI technique should be used.

Page 3: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Knowledge representation

• Knowledge representation is a crucial issue.

• What our agent is expected to do and in what domain, will have a significant impact on the type of knowledge representation we should use.

Page 4: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Reasoning

• The amount of intelligence required by an agent , in terms of the size of the knowledge base and sophistication of the reasoning algorithms , is significantly impacted by the degree of autonomy and mobility the agent has .

• Mobile agents place special requirements on the security of the knowledge base it travels through the network.

Page 5: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Learning

• Whether learning is a desirable function depends on the domain the intelligent agent will work in , as well as the environment.

• Learning is most useful when an agent is used in complex environments to perform repetitive tasks , or when the agent must adapt to unknown situations.

Page 6: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Autonomous Intelligent Agents

Requirements for Autonomous Intelligent Agents include:

• Perception• Taking Action

Page 7: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Perception

• In order for a software agent to take some intelligent action , it first has to be able to perceive what is going on around it.

• An intelligent agent uses its sensors as a source of information.

• A fundamental part of perception is the ability to recognize and filter out the expected events and attend to the unexpected ones.

Page 8: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Taking Action

• Intelligent Agents use effectors to take actions either by sending messages to other agents or by calling application programming interfaces or system services directly.

• If our agent takes an action directly under its control, we can probably consider it done.However, when we are dealing with intermediaries , whether other agent or unknown systems, then some extra precautions and checking are probably in order.

Page 9: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Multiagent Systems

• Multiagent systems are applications in which many autonomous software agents are combined together to solve large problems.

• The RoboCup challenge is an example of the current state-of-the-art of multivalent systems , in which teams of autonomous agents compete in a simulated soccer tournament.

Page 10: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Blackboards

• Blackboard is the oldest multiagent system architecture used as a problem-solving technique.

• The Blackboard is a data structure that is used as the general communication mechanism for the multiple knowledge sources and is managed and arbitrated by a controller.

Page 11: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Blackboards

• As each agent works on its part of the problem, it looks to the blackboard to pick up new information posted by other agents , and it, in turn, posts its results to the Blackboard.

• Blackboard systems are used as a communication mechanism when building single large applications and want to modularize the knowledge bases.

Page 12: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Communication

• An environment where agents with very different structures and with no knowledge of a centralized background can work together, the agents will need to communicate with each other.

• Communication can be :• Directly to each other• Through an interpreter or facilitator.

Page 13: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Communication

• To be able to communicate, a language is needed.

• There is a level of basic language which is the syntax and format of the messages and there is a deeper level, the meaning or semantics.

• For the semantics to be easily understood , a shared vocabulary of words and their meanings is needed. This shared vocabulary is called an ontology.

• The most widely used agent communication language (ACL) is Knowledge Query and Manipulation Language (KQML).

Page 14: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Knowledge Query and Manipulation Language

• Knowledge Query and Manipulation Language (KQML) provides a framework for a set of independent agents to communicate and cooperate on a problem using messages called per formatives.

– Directives: commands or requests– Representatives: facts or beliefs– Commissives: promises or threats

• KQML uses ontologies to ensure that two agents are communicating in the same language

• KQML messages encode information at three different architectural levels: content, message and communication. An example of a KQML messagefrom agent joe asking about the price of a share of SUN stock might be encoded as:

(ask-one:sender joe --comm. level:content (real price = sun.price()) --content level:receiver stock-server --comm. level:reply-with sun-stock --comm. level:language java --message level:ontology NYSE-TICKS) --message level

Page 15: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Agent Standards

• Standards are becoming more important as agents become a large part of the electronic commerce infrastructure.

• Two major efforts of standardization are:– The Foundation for Intelligent physical Agents

(FIPA) that is focused primarily on agent-level issues.

– The Object Management Group (OMG) that is focused on object-level interoperability and management

Page 16: Agents and Multiagent Systems

FIPA & OMG

• FIPA is dominated by computer and telecommunications companies and is focused primarily on agent-level issues.

• OMG is the standards body that created the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) distributed object protocol and tends to focus on object-level interoperability and management.

Page 17: Agents and Multiagent Systems
Page 18: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Co-operating Agents

• Co-operation among agents allows a community of specialized agents to pool their capabilities to solve large problems but with the additional cost of communication overhead.

• Distributed systems management, electronic commerce and multi agent design systems are three application areas in which co-operating agents have been applied.

• It is likely that a combination using the team structure and roles to limit communications , along with distributed planning techniques , will provide the best solution to building multiagent teams.

Page 19: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Competing Agents

• Competition between agents will occur as soon as intelligent agents are deployed by individuals or companies with different agendas and those agents interact in the e-commerce environment

• Intelligent agents will be used to provide advantages for individuals and businesses.

• Negotiation protocols, such as Contract Net , auctions and bargaining, are used to allow agents to compete for business.

Page 20: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Agent Software Engineering Issues

• Designing multiagent systems is similar to object-oriented but requires some additional analysis and modeling techniques.

• A common approach for designing agents and multiagent systems is to define roles for team members.

• While agent applications are becoming increasingly popular, there have not been many proposals for agent-oriented methodologies for analysis, design, and software development.

Page 21: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Designing Agents

Two Popular methods are:• The agent modeling technique for systems of

agents. This approach looks to the problem from two perspectives: an external and internal one.– External: The agents themselves (agent Model) and

their interactions (interaction model)– Internal: Relationship with other agents, a goal, and a

plan to achieve the goal

• CoMoMas extension to the CommonKADS knowledge engineering methodology.

Page 22: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Multi Agent Interaction Models

• Model 1:

RequestingAgent Facilitator

ServiceAgent

1-Request 2-Request

3-Response4-Response

Page 23: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Multi Agent Interaction Models

• Model 2

RequestingAgent Facilitator

ServiceAgent

1-Request 2-Request

3-Response

Page 24: Agents and Multiagent Systems

Multi Agent Interaction Models

• Model 3

RequestingAgent Facilitator

ServiceAgent

1-Request

2- Address of service Agent

3-Request

4-Response