Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Business Paper
Independent Hearing and Assessment
Panel
Wednesday, 4 July 2018
Electronic Determination meeting
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 2
ORDER OF BUSINESS
1. DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST
2. REPORTS FROM OFFICERS
IHAP041-18 CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED AWNING
(E-DETERMINATION)
IHAP042-18 ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO EXISTING RETAINING WALL
AND FRONT FENCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RETAINING
WALL AND FENCE
(E-DETERMINATION)
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 3
IHA
P04
1-1
8
IHAP041-18 PROPOSAL: CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED AWNING
(E-DETERMINATION)
PROPERTY: LOT129 DP 25920 (NO. 26) FOURTH AVENUE,
LOFTUS
APPLICANT: ATS AWNINGS AND ADDITIONS
FILE NUMBER: DA18/0246
Attachments: Appendix A,⇩ Appendix B⇩ and Appendix C⇩
REASON FOR THE REPORT
This application is referred to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) because the
proposal involves a pre-existing variation greater than 10% to the landscaped area development
standard.
PROPOSAL
The application is for the construction of an attached awning over existing uncovered verandah at the
above property.
ASSESSMENT OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION
THAT:
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Clause 4.6 of Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015,
the written submission in relation to the variation to the minimum landscaped area satisfies
the relevant provisions of Clause 4.6 and is therefore supported. It is recommended that the
provisions of Clause 4.6 be invoked and that the minimum landscaped area development
standard be varied to 32.7%, in respect to this application.
2. That Development Application No. 18/0246 for construction of an attached awning at Lot 129
DP 25920 26 Fourth Avenue, Loftus be approved, subject to the conditions contained in
Appendix “A” of the report.
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 4
IHA
P04
1-1
8
ASSESSMENT OFFICER’S COMMENTARY
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
An application has been received for the construction of an attached awning at the above property.
The awning is proposed to be located above the existing front verandah above the garage. The
proposal does not impact the existing setbacks, which are 12.711m from the street (front); side
setbacks of 5.246m (east) and 1.15m (west) and the rear setback of 33.872m.
A site plan is provided below.
Figure 1: Site plan indicating the location of proposed development.
SITE DESCRIPTION AND LOCALITY
The subject site is located on the southern side of Fourth Avenue in Loftus and slopes to the street.
The site is irregular in shape with a front boundary width of 16.154m and a site area of 746.1m2.
Existing on the site is a two storey dwelling house, inground swimming pool and garden shed.
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 5
IHA
P04
1-1
8
The site is surrounded by predominately low density housing consisting of single and two storey
dwellings with brick and weatherboard finishes. Adjoining development consists of single storey
dwellings to the western side and rear, and two storey dwellings to the eastern side.
An aerial photo is provided below.
Figure 2: Aerial photo of the subject site and its surrounds.
BACKGROUND
A history of the development proposal is as follows:
The current application was submitted on 06 March 2018.
The application was placed on exhibition, with the last date for public submissions being 05
April 2018.
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 6
IHA
P04
1-1
8
The requested Clause 4.6 variation statement was lodged on 23 April 2018 to justify the
variation to the minimum landscape area development standard.
ADEQUACY OF APPLICANT’S SUBMISSION
In relation to the Statement of Environmental Effects, plans and other documentation submitted with
the application or after a request from Council, the applicant has provided adequate information to
Council to enable an assessment of this application, including a written request to vary the minimum
landscaped area development standard under Clause 4.6 of Sutherland Shire Local Environmental
Plan 2015.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The application was advertised in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 42 of Sutherland Shire
Development Control Plan 2015 (SSDCP 2015).
Council notified 8 adjoining or affected owners of the proposal and 0 (zero) submissions were
received.
STATUTORY CONSIDERATIONS
The subject land is located within Zone E4 Environmental Living pursuant to the provisions of
Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015. The proposed development, being the construction
of an attached awning, is a permissible land use within the zone with development consent from
Council.
The following Environmental Planning Instruments (EPIs), Draft EPIs, Development Control Plans
(DCPs), Codes or Policies are relevant to this application:
Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015 (SSLEP 2015).
Sutherland Shire Development Control Plan 2015 (SSDCP 2015).
COMPLIANCE
The compliance table below contains a summary of applicable development standards and controls
and a compliance checklist relative to these:
Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015
CLAUSE REQUIRED PROPOSAL COMPLIANCE NOTES
Clause 4.3 –
Height of
Buildings
Maximum 8.5m
<8.5m Yes
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 7
IHA
P04
1-1
8
Clause 6.14 -
Landscape Area
Site area 746.1m2
Minimum 40%
298.44m2
32.7%
243.8m2
No
18.3%
Variation
Variation is
pre-existing;
No change to
existing
landscaped
area.
CHAPTER 2:
B. Dwellings Houses in the E4 Environmental Living Zone
Sutherland Shire Development Control Plan 2015
REQUIRED PROPOSAL COMPLIANCE NOTES
2.2 Building Setbacks
2.2.2:
Street setback:
7.5m or the established street
setback
6.0m (Greenhills Beach)
3.0m (Secondary street)
4.0m (Internal lot)
Side setback:
1.5m
Rear setback:
6.0m
4.0m (Internal lot)
Street setback
12.711m
Side setback
5.246m (east)
1.150m (west)
Rear setback
33.872m
No
Western
side
setback is
in line with
the existing
setback.
2.2.6. Side setback may be
reduced to 900mm for alts and
adds to dwellings that have an
existing side setback of 900mm –
subject to not impeding emergency
access.
Western side setback in line with
the existing setback. Yes
3.2 Landform
3.2.1. Development is to be
located so that:
a) Clearing of vegetation is
avoided.
Development is over an existing
verandah. Yes
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 8
IHA
P04
1-1
8
b) A stable building footprint can
be established that:
I. Does not rely on cut or fill, or
any other form of terracing,
II. Avoids the location of
buildings over slopes greater
than 18 degrees or 33%,
and
III. Uses, where practical, a
natural flat area.
6.2 Visual and Acoustic Privacy
6.2.1. Locate, orientate and design
new development to ensure visual
privacy between buildings, and
between buildings and adjacent
POS areas.
Proposed awning will not affect
the privacy of adjacent
neighbours.
Yes
ASSESSMENT
A detailed assessment of the application has been carried out having regard to the Heads of
Consideration under Section 4.15 (1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The
following matters are considered important to this application.
Landscaped Area
The proposed development fails to comply with the development standard for landscaped area.
Clause 6.14 (3) of SSLEP 2015 stipulates a minimum landscaped area of 40% or 298.44m2 for this
site.
The development proposes a landscaped area of 32.7% or 243.8m2 which fails to provide the
minimum required by approximately 7.3% or 54.64m2.
The objectives of the landscaped area development standard set out in Clause 6.14 of SSLEP 2015
are as follows:
(a) to ensure adequate opportunities exist for the retention or provision of vegetation that
contributes to biodiversity and, in the case of trees, enhances the tree canopy of Sutherland
Shire,
(b) to minimise urban run-off by maximising permeable areas on the sites of development,
(c) to ensure that the visual impact of development is minimised by appropriate landscaping and
that the landscaping is maintained,
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 9
IHA
P04
1-1
8
(d) to ensure that landscaping carried out in connection with development is sufficient to
complement the scale of buildings, provide shade, screen parking areas and enhance workforce
amenities.
In consideration of these objectives, the proposed development retains the existing vegetation with no
further reduction in landscaped area. Additionally, the proposed awning will reduce urban run-off by
capturing and disposing of stormwater which would otherwise fall on the existing verandah and
contribute to the sites run-off.
Despite the landscaped area remaining unchanged, the proposal demonstrates a net improvement in
the sites ability to achieve the objectives of Clause 6.14 of SSLEP 2015.
The proposed development is located within Zone E4 Environmental Living. The objectives of this
zone are as follows:
To provide for low-impact residential development in areas with special ecological,
scientific or aesthetic values.
To ensure that residential development does not have an adverse effect on those
values.
To allow for development that preserves and enhances the natural landscape setting of
the locality.
To protect and restore trees, bushland and scenic values particularly along ridgelines
and in other areas of high visual significance.
To ensure the character of the locality is not diminished by the cumulative impacts of
development.
To minimise the risk to life, property and the environment by restricting the type or level
and intensity of development on land that is subject to natural or man-made hazards.
To allow the subdivision of land only if the size of the resulting lots makes them capable
of development that retains or restores natural features while allowing a sufficient area
for development.
To share views between new and existing development and also from public space.
The proposed awning is over an existing verandah and will result in an area that is more practical for
the occupants and visitors of the subject site, whilst not resulting in additional impacts. The proposal
retains the existing landscaped area and character of the locality. The deficient landscaped area does
not prevent the existing dwelling from meeting the relevant objectives above.
The applicant has lodged a written request in accordance with the requirements of Clause 4.6 of
SSLEP 2015.
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 10
IHA
P04
1-1
8
A full copy of this request is on the file and the most relevant section is reproduced below:
“Our proposal will not take away any existing soft landscape areas such as plants trees
and grass areas. In fact more pots plants will be placed on the patio area.”
The applicant’s written submission demonstrates that compliance with the landscaped area
development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case. It also
demonstrates sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify varying this development standard.
The proposed development is in the public interest as the proposal complies with the objectives for
both landscaped area and the E4 zone.
The proposed variation does not raise any matters of State or regional environmental planning
significance. In addition there is no public benefit to maintain the landscaped area development
standard in the circumstances of this case.
In conclusion the variation to the landscaped area development standard satisfies all relevant parts of
Clause 4.6 and therefore the variation can be supported.
Side Boundary Setback
The proposed awning shows a side setback of 1.15m from the western boundary. The SSDCP 2015
specifies a minimum side boundary setback of 1.5m for additions to existing dwellings in the E4 zone.
This results in a non-compliance of 0.35m which represents a 23% non-compliance with the
development control.
It is considered that strict compliance with the standard would be unreasonable and unnecessary for
the following reasons:
The proposed awning is proposed to follow the footprint of the existing dwelling and will be in
line with the existing dwelling. The existing dwelling has a reduced side setback of 1.15m and
the proposed awning will follow this existing setback.
The proposed awning will be located above the existing verandah and it is not expected that
there will be any additional privacy impacts on adjoining neighbours associated with the
construction of the awning over the verandah.
The extent of the non-compliance will have minimal impact to the streetscape and character of
the area.
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 11
IHA
P04
1-1
8
Stormwater Management
Clause 6.4 requires Council to be satisfied of certain matters in relation to stormwater management
prior to development consent being granted. These matters include maximising permeable surfaces;
on-site stormwater retention minimising the impacts on stormwater runoff. These matters have been
addressed to Council’s satisfaction.
Urban Design (Residential Buildings)
Clauses 6.16 and 6.17 of SSLEP 2015 contain certain matters of consideration relating to urban
design. The relevant matters have been considered as a part of the assessment of the application and
the proposal is considered to be acceptable.
Archaeological Sensitivity
Council records indicate that the subject site is rated medium in terms of Archaeological Sensitivity. A
site inspection did not reveal any evidence of shell material or significant sandstone features within the
development zone. The proposal does not warrant an Aboriginal Archaeological Study being
undertaken.
SECTION 7.12 CONTRIBUTIONS
Due to its nature, the proposed development will not require or increase the demand for local and
district facilities within the area. Accordingly, it does not generate any Section 7.12 contributions.
DECLARATIONS OF AFFILIATION, GIFTS AND POLITICAL DONATIONS
Section 10.4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 requires the declaration of
donations/gifts in excess of $1000. In addition Council’s development application form requires a
general declaration of affiliation. In relation to this development application no declaration has been
made.
CONCLUSION
The subject land is located within Zone E4 Environmental Living pursuant to the provisions of
Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015. The proposed development, being the construction
of an attached awning, is a permissible land use within the zone with development consent.
In response to public exhibition, 0 submissions were received.
The proposal includes a variation to the development standard for landscaped area. This variation
has been discussed and is considered acceptable.
The application has been assessed having regard to the Heads of Consideration under Section 4.15
of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The application will not result in any
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 12
IHA
P04
1-1
8
significant impact on the environment or the amenity of nearby residents. Following assessment,
Development Application No. 18/0246 may be supported for the reasons outlined in this report.
The officer responsible for the preparation of this Report is the Manager, Development Assessment &
Certification (SW), who can be contacted on 9710 0333.
File Number: DA18/0246
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 13
IHA
P04
1-1
8 A
pp
en
dix
A
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 14
IHA
P04
1-1
8 A
pp
en
dix
A
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 15
IHA
P04
1-1
8 A
pp
en
dix
A
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 16
IHA
P04
1-1
8 A
pp
en
dix
B
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 17
IHA
P04
1-1
8 A
pp
en
dix
C
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 18
IHA
P04
2-1
8
IHAP042-18 PROPOSAL: ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO EXISTING
RETAINING WALL AND FRONT FENCE AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RETAINING WALL AND
FENCE
(E-DETERMINATION)
PROPERTY: LOT 101 DP 1008214 (NO. 2) SILVEREYE COURT,
WORONORA HEIGHTS
APPLICANT: J L DESIGN
FILE NUMBER: DA18/0288
Attachments: Appendix A,⇩ Appendix B⇩ and Appendix C⇩
REASON FOR THE REPORT
This application is referred to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) because the
proposal involves a pre-existing variation greater than 10% to the landscaped area development
standard.
ASSESSMENT OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION
THAT:
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Clause 4.6 of Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015,
the written submission in relation to the variation to the minimum landscaped area satisfies
the relevant provisions of Clause 4.6 and is therefore supported. It is recommended that the
provisions of Clause 4.6 be invoked and that the minimum landscaped area development
standard be varied to 32%, in respect to this application.
2. Development Application No. 18/0288 for alterations and additions to existing retaining wall
and front fence and construction of new retaining wall and fence at Lot 101 DP 1008214
2 Silvereye Court, Woronora Heights is approved, subject to the conditions contained in
Appendix “A” of the report.
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 19
IHA
P04
2-1
8
ASSESSMENT OFFICER’S COMMENTARY
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
An application has been received for a minor increase in height to an existing retaining wall, front
fence and construction of new retaining wall and fence at the above property. The ground level in
close proximity to the pool area will remain unchanged; however will be extended towards the northern
boundary. The proposed site plan is provided overleaf.
Figure 1: Site plan for the proposed development at 2 Silvereye Court WORONORA HEIGHTS.
SITE DESCRIPTION AND LOCALITY
Situated on the land is an existing two storey brick and tile finish dwelling with in ground pool situated
towards the rear of the site. The subject site is located off the western side of Silvereye Court. The site
is irregular in shape providing for a total site area of approximately 639m². The land falls slightly
towards the north of the site. The subject site is burdened by a drainage easement, and is identified as
bushfire prone land. There are no significant site features that would inhibit the proposed
development.
The street scape in the immediate vicinity of the subject land is characterised by housing of single and
two storey dwellings of various styles and finishes. Adjoining development consists of buildings of
similar scale and size as the existing development.
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 20
IHA
P04
2-1
8
Figure 2: Aerial photo of the subject site and its surrounds.
BACKGROUND
A history of the development proposal is as follows:
The current application was submitted on 14 March 2018.
The application was placed on exhibition, with no submissions were received as a result.
ADEQUACY OF APPLICANT’S SUBMISSION
In relation to the Statement of Environmental Effects, plans and other documentation submitted with
the application or after a request from Council, the applicant has provided adequate information to
Council to enable an assessment of this application, including a written request to vary the landscaped
area development standard under Clause 4.6 of Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The application was advertised in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 42 of Sutherland Shire
Development Control Plan 2015 (SSDCP 2015). Council notified adjoining or affected owners of the
proposal and no submissions were received.
STATUTORY CONSIDERATIONS
The subject land is located within Zone E4 Environmental Living pursuant to the provisions of
Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015. The proposed development, being retaining wall(s)
and boundary fencing works, is a permissible land use within the zone with development consent from
Council.
The following Environmental Planning Instruments (EPIs), Development Control Plan (DCP), Codes or
Policies are relevant to this application:
Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015 (SSLEP 2015).
Sutherland Shire Development Control Plan 2015 (SSDCP 2015).
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 21
IHA
P04
2-1
8
COMPLIANCE
The compliance table below contains a summary of applicable development standards and controls
and a compliance checklist relative to these:
Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015
Clause / Requirement Requirement Proposed Complies? (% Variation)
Cl6.14 Landscaped Area: Min 40% 32% No (20%)
Sutherland Shire Development Control Plan 2015 : Chapter 34 – Ancillary Development
Part B Specific Forms of Development: 4 – Retaining Walls
B.4.1.1 Retaining walls heights Max 1.0m 3.2m No (220%)
B.4.1.2 Retaining walls setback: Min 1.0m 0.2m No (80%)
ASSESSMENT
A detailed assessment of the application has been carried out having regard to the Heads of
Consideration under Section 4.15(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.The
following matters are considered important to this application.
Landscaped Area
The proposed development fails to comply with the development standard for landscaped area.
Clause 6.14 (3) of Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015 (SSLEP 2015) stipulates a
minimum landscaped area of 40% (255m²) for this site. The subject site currently affords a landscaped
area of 32% (205m²), representing a pre-existing deficiency of 50m² or a variation of 20%.
The objectives of the landscaped area development standard set out in Clause 6.14 of SSLEP 2015
are as follows:
(a) to ensure adequate opportunities exist for the retention or provision of vegetation that
contributes to biodiversity and, in the case of trees, enhances the tree canopy of Sutherland
Shire,
(b) to minimise urban run-off by maximising permeable areas on the sites of development,
(c) to ensure that the visual impact of development is minimised by appropriate landscaping and
that the landscaping is maintained,
(d) to ensure that landscaping carried out in connection with development is sufficient to
complement the scale of buildings, provide shade, screen parking areas and enhance workforce
amenities.
The subject site currently dedicates a substantial hardstand area within the front setback due to the
location of the attached garage, and incorporates landscaped area as part of its private open space in
the side and rear yard. The subject site is not occupied by any trees; however vegetation exits and
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 22
IHA
P04
2-1
8
shall be retained along the street frontages screening the site from the road frontage. The proposed
development will allow for additional usability of the side and rear yard. Despite the pre-existing
deficiency in landscaped area, the subject site doesn’t allow adequate opportunities for the provision
of vegetation,
particular for tree planting due to existing structures on site. The proposed development will not impact
on any existing vegetation located on the subject site or on adjoining properties.
Zone E4 Environmental Living
To provide for low-impact residential development in areas with special ecological,
scientific or aesthetic values.
To ensure that residential development does not have an adverse effect on those
values.
To allow for development that preserves and enhances the natural landscape setting of
the locality.
To protect and restore trees, bushland and scenic values particularly along ridgelines
and in other areas of high visual significance.
To ensure the character of the locality is not diminished by the cumulative impacts of
development.
To minimise the risk to life, property and the environment by restricting the type or level
and intensity of development on land that is subject to natural or man-made hazards.
To allow the subdivision of land only if the size of the resulting lots makes them capable
of development that retains or restores natural features while allowing a sufficient area
for development.
To share views between new and existing development and also from public space.
The proposed development will have no additional impact in the ecological and aesthetic values of the
immediate locality. The proposed development, together with the existing structures on the subject
site, is of a scale and nature that maintains the natural landscape setting of the locality, and protects
and conserves existing vegetation and other natural features of the locality. As such, the proposed
development is considered to be consistent with the objectives of zone E4 Environmental living.
The applicant has lodged a written request in accordance with the requirements of Clause 4.6 of
SSLEP 2015. A full copy of this request is on the file and the most relevant section is reproduced
below:
“the proposed retaining walls/boundary fencing has been designed specifically for the
usability of the side and rear yard-”
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 23
IHA
P04
2-1
8
The applicant’s written submission demonstrates that compliance with the landscaped area
development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case. It also
demonstrates sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify varying this development standard.
The proposed development is in the public interest as the proposal complies with the objectives for
both landscaped area and the E4 Environmental Living zone.
The proposed variation does not raise any matters of State or regional environmental planning
significance. In addition there is no public benefit to maintain the landscaped area development
standard in the circumstances of this case. In conclusion the variation to the landscaped area
development standard satisfies relevant parts of Clause 4.6 and therefore the variation can be
supported.
Earthworks
The proposal includes earthworks and Clause 6.2 of SSLEP 2015 requires certain matters to be
considered in deciding whether to grant consent. These matters include impacts on drainage; future
development; quality and source of fill; effect on adjoining properties; destination of excavated
material; likely disturbance of relics; impacts on waterways; catchments and sensitive areas and
measures to mitigate impacts. The relevant matters have been considered and the application is
acceptable.
Urban Design (Residential Buildings)
Clauses 6.16 and 6.17 of SSLEP 2015 contain certain matters of consideration relating to urban
design. The relevant matters have been considered as a part of the assessment of the application and
the proposal is considered to be acceptable.
Bushfire
Council records indicate that the site is bushfire prone land. The proposed retaining walls and
colorbond fencing will screen the existing and modified boundary fencing; it is considered that no
specific bushfire related construction or controls are relevant to the proposed development.
Archaeological Sensitivity
Council records indicate that the subject site is rated medium in terms of Archaeological Sensitivity. A
site inspection did not reveal any evidence of shell material or significant sandstone features within the
development zone. The proposal does not warrant an Aboriginal Archaeological Study being
undertaken.
Variation to Retaining wall setback/height
The proposed development incorporates a fill of approximately 3.2m and a setback of 0.2m
predominately along the northern boundary. The proposed development has been designed to allow
for additional usable side and rear yard. The outcome of this is positive in this particular case as;
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 24
IHA
P04
2-1
8
The proposal responds to the natural landform, minimise earthworks and minimise any spoil
removal and maintain the stability and integrity of geological elements in the vicinity of the site;
Proposal can be erected without affecting trees in adjoining properties;
The depth of footings is unlikely to affect groundwater; and
The proposed development is consistent with adjoining dwellings and will have a minimal
adverse impact on the streetscape.
SECTION 7.12 CONTRIBUTIONS
The proposed development has a value not greater than $100,000. As such, in accordance with
Council’s adopted Section 94A Development Contribution Plan 2016, the proposed development will
not attract Section 7.12 Contributions.
DECLARATIONS OF AFFILIATION, GIFTS AND POLITICAL DONATIONS
Section 10.4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 requires the declaration of
donations/gifts in excess of $1000. In addition Council’s development application form requires a
general declaration of affiliation. In relation to this development application no declaration has been
made.
CONCLUSION
The subject land is located within Zone E4 Environmental Living pursuant to the provisions of
Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015. The proposed development, being retaining wall(s)
and boundary fencing works as ancillary structures to a dwelling house, is a permissible within the
zone with development consent.
The application was placed on public exhibition and no submissions were received. The application
includes a pre-existing variation to the landscaped area development standard. The pre-existing
variation has been discussed and is considered acceptable subject to the considerations detailed in
this report.
The application has been assessed having regard to the Heads of Consideration under Section
4.15(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The application will not result in any
significant impact on the environment or the amenity of nearby residents. Following assessment,
Development Application No.18/0288 is recommended to be supported for the reasons outlined in this
report.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICER
The officer responsible for the preparation of this Report is the Manager, Development Assessment &
Certification (DF) who can be contacted on 9710 0333.
File Number: DA18/0288.
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 25
IHA
P04
2-1
8 A
pp
en
dix
A
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 26
IHA
P04
2-1
8 A
pp
en
dix
A
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 27
IHA
P04
2-1
8 A
pp
en
dix
A
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 28
IHA
P04
2-1
8 A
pp
en
dix
B
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel 4 July 2018
Page 29
IHA
P04
2-1
8 A
pp
en
dix
C