8/12/2019 Against Politics

1/3

bleedingheartlibertarians.com http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/

Jaso n Brennan

Ideal Frat Theory

Im in the process of writing Against Politics . Among o ther t hings, the book argues that Mill was wrong andSchumpeter was right about ho w political engagement af f ects us. Political engagement doesnt t end toennoble us, but t ends to make us stupider, more epistemically defective, and more morally vicious. Heres avery draf ty f irst draf t o f a section discussing deliberative democracy. This f ollows a section in which Ireviewed the empirical literature, which overwhelmingly seems to show that deliberative democracy fails todeliver the pro mised educative and aretaic benefits , and, o n the cont rary, seems t o make people worseoverall.

Real-world deliberation doesnt deliver the promised educative and aretaic benefitsin fact, it

often makes things worse.

But one way to protect deliberative democracy from disconfirming empirical research is tocomplain that people arent deliberating properly. Deliberative democrats can continue to assert that if people would follow, say, Habermass rules of proper discourse, then deliberation would deliver certain educative and aretaic benefits. As the evidence itself shows, people do not follow those rules.

Thus, the empirical research fails to falsify the deliberative democrats claims. After all, asanyone who has taken introductory logic should know, these two sets of claims are compatible:

1. If people deliberate properly, deliberation will tend to educate and ennoble them2. People do not deliberate properly, and improper deliberation fails to educate and ennoble

them. In fact, it stultifies them and exacerbates their biases.

The statement If P then Q is not falsified by evidence of not-P and not-Q. So, the empirical research doesnt show that proper deliberation fails to educate or ennoble us. But deliberativedemocrats should not rest secure. To see why, lets parody the debate here.

Sigma Alpha Epsilon strives to give young men the leadership, scholarship, service and social experiences they need to excel SAEs strive to mold [their] members into gentlemen so they can set an example in todays society. [i] Sigma Nu stylizes its members as knights whobelieve in the life of life, walk the in the way of honor, and serve in the light of truth. [ii] BetaTheta Pi strives to develop men of principle for a principled life. [iii] Phi Delta Theta was built on three pillars that havent budged an inch since the fraternity was founded, including the pillar of the attainmentof a high standard of morality. [iv]

College social fraternities are supposed to make men into better men. In the language of philosophical virtue ethics, these fraternities are supposed to serve both an educative and anaretaic function. Fraternities are usually founded on high-minded ideals.. They strive totransform ordinary men into extraordinary men, to bring out the best in each of them. Most fraternities have extensive educational programs designed to cultivate virtue, scholarship, and a

commitment to service among their brothers.

http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_edn3http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_edn4http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_edn3http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_edn2http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_edn1http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/

8/12/2019 Against Politics

2/3

But, in fact, college frats tend to fall far short of their ideals. College frats are often rapefactories, full of drunken men who take advantage of drunken women. Among men who commit rape or sexual assault on a college campus, fraternity men seem to be disproportionately represented. [v] Men who join fraternities drink more, and drink more frequently, than other college men. [vi] Fraternity men are more likely to engage in academic dishonesty than men whodo not join fraternities. [vii] Even though almost all fraternities mission statements include adedication to the highest standards of scholarship, first-year fraternity men tend to have worseGPAs and to do worse on various tests of cognitive ability than non-fraternity men, though thisgap tends to shrink over time. [viii] Fraternity men nationwide may high slightly higher averageGPAs than non-fraternity men, but part of the explanation for this is that most fraternities must suspend and even expel members with GPAs lower than a C+. There is no evidence, at least that I can find, that joining a fraternity tends to improve mens GPAs.

Not all fraternities are the same, of course. Some individual fraternities on some campuses arebetter than others. Still, the overall weight of the evidence shows that fraternities tend toundermine rather than support their aretaic goals. Fraternities seem to be more of a diseasethan a cure, whatever the noble intentions of their founders may have been. In general, collegefraternities probably reinforce sexist, homophobic, and dishonest attitudes, and tend to

encourage far more vice than virtue

Imagine a conversation in which a critic of college fraternities advanced all of these criticisms.Then imagine that the executive director of, say, Sigma Nu responded, Sure, actual fraternitiestend to corrupt men rather than ennoble them. But when I defend fraternities, I mean to say that such fraternities would educate and ennoble college men, if only fraternity men acted properly and went through the fraternity experience the right way. The college fraternity experience

provides an excellent opportunity for men to develop into true gentlemen, who live with honor,who hold themselves to the highest moral standards. Its just too bad that men do not properly take advantage of this opportunity. Still, I think its important that we keep providing them withopportunity, as much as possible. Its also important that we keep researching ways to get mento use the fraternity experience the correct way.

Theres a sense in which the directors response is absolutely right, and yet absurd at the sametime.The directors response is that the problem isnt with the fraternities, but with the men who

join them. Angelic men would do far better. The director is probably correct that fraternitieswould ennoble and educate, if only the men who joined them behaved appropriately. (Its difficult to test that claim, but it remains plausible.) At the same time, the director fails to take thecriticisms of fraternities seriously. Critics of fraternities do not deny that under highly idealized circumstances, fraternities could educate and ennoble. Instead, they are complaining that as amatter of fact, fraternities tend to do more harm than good.

Whats go ing on?

When deliberative democrats asserts that deliberation will tend to educate and enlighten people,this sounds at first as though they are making an interesting causal claim, equivalent to theclaim Advil tends to cure headaches. However, they are really asserting something closer to atautology, something closer to the claim Headache cures tend to cure headaches. Notice thedifference between the following two claims:

1. If people deliberate properly, then deliberation will tend to educate and enlighten them.

2. If people deliberate, this will tend to educate and enlighten them.

http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_edn8http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_edn7http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_edn6http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_edn5

8/12/2019 Against Politics

3/3

Claim A is pretty close to being a tautology. To say we deliberate properly is to say we acquireinformation from one another in a scientifically minded, rational, unbiased way. If people (whohave different information) deliberate with one another and fail to become better educated, thenit follows that they did not properly deliberate. So, of course proper deliberation educates peopleif people arent educated by deliberation, then the deliberation was by definition improper.

[i] http://www.sae.net/page.aspx?pid=753

[ii] http://www.sigmanu.org/about/the_creed.php

[iii] http://www.betathetapi.org/home/about/become-a-beta/

[iv] http://www.phideltatheta.org/about/

[v]http://www.universityherald.com/articles/4521/20130912/wesleyan-university-rape-factory-frat-house-victim-reach-settlement-lawsuit.htm ; Frintner, Mary Pat; Rubinson, Laurna.

Acquaintance rape: The influence of alcohol, fraternity membership, and sports teammembership. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy, Vol 19(4), 1993, 272-284; Koss, M., and J.Gaines (1993). The Prediction of Sexual Aggression by Alcohol Use, Athletic Participation and Fraternity Affiliation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 8(1):94108; Humphrey, S., and A.Kahn (2000). Fraternities, Athletic Teams and Rape: Importance of Identification With a Risky Group. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 15(12):13131322. Koss, M., and H. Cleveland III (1996); Athletic Participation, Fraternity Membership and Date Rape: The Question RemainsSelf-Selection or Different Causal Processes? Violence Against Women 2(2):180190;Humphrey, S., and A. Kahn (2000). Fraternities, Athletic Teams and Rape: Importance of Identification With a Risky Group. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 15(12):13131322. However, for a contrary point of view, see Martin D. Schwartz and Carol A. Nogrady,Fraternity Membership, Rape Myths, and Sexual Aggression on a College Campus, Violence

Against Women June 1996 vol. 2 no. 2 148-162

[vi] Peer Effects and Alcohol Use among College Students

Authors: Kremer, Michael; Levy, Dan

Source: The Journal of Economic Perspectives , Volume 22, Number 3, Summer 2008 , pp. 189

[vii] Donald McCabe and Linda Trevino, Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation, Research in Higher Education 38 (1997): 379-396.

[viii] http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-campus/201109/how-fraternities-and-sororities-

impact-students-or-do-they

http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_ednref8http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_ednref7http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aea/jep;jsessionid=r2ljjc2l057v.alexandrahttp://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_ednref6http://www.universityherald.com/articles/4521/20130912/wesleyan-university-rape-factory-frat-house-victim-reach-settlement-lawsuit.htmhttp://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_ednref5http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_ednref4http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_ednref3http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_ednref2http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/02/ideal-frat-theory/#_ednref1