Upload
jesusmuriel
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 1/95
Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
BY
Benjamin M. Slagowski
Submitted to the graduate degree program in Classics and the raduate !acult" o# the$ni%ersit" o# &ansas in partial #ul#illment o# the reuirements #or the degree o# Master
o# Arts.
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((Chairperson )amela ordon
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
Emma Scioli
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((Michael Shaw
*ate *e#ended+ April ,,- ,/0
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 2/95
All rights reserved
INFORMATION TO ALL USERSThe quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscriptand there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
a note will indicate the deletion.
Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code
ProQuest LLC.789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346
UMI 1540924
Published by ProQuest LLC (2013). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
UMI Number: 1540924
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 3/95
ii
1he 1hesis Committee #or Benjamin M. Slagowski
certi#ies that this is the appro%ed %ersion o# the #ollowing thesis+
Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((Chairperson )amela ordon
*ate appro%ed+ April ,,- ,/0
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 4/95
iii
Abstract
1his paper e2amines Herodas' interest in aesthetic and ethical criticism
throughout his mimiamboi . 1his serious concern with such ele%ated topics is
appropriate- and perhaps e%en e2pected- gi%en Herodas' clear e##ort in the eighth
mimiamb to locate his new genre o# poetr" within the iambic tradition in general- and
the Hipponactean strain o# iambos in particular. Anal"sis o# the #ourth- si2th- se%enth-
and eighth mimes demonstrates a keen awareness o# the poet's cra#t- poetic techniues-
and contemporar" aesthetic %alues. 3hile pla"ing the role o# aesthetic critic- Herodas
promotes an ideal reader o# his poetr"- and instructs this reader in how best to
contemplate his poems. 1he #irst- third- and #i#th mimes all show an interest in
pronouncing statements dealing with ethical beha%ior and ele%ated philosophical
concerns. As an ethical critic- Herodas does not issue clear statements establishing or
promoting proper ethical conduct- but #oregrounds topics o# great general interest to a
wide Hellenistic audience. $ltimatel" it shall become e%ident that Herodas' poetr"
concerns itsel# with the same elite- intellectual issues that pro%ed o# interest to his
contemporaries.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 5/95
iv
Acknowledgments
4 would like to thank )ro#essor )amela ordon #or the man" hours she has spent
reading dra#ts- pro%iding %aluable #eedback- and o##ering general ad%ice on this project
and others. 1he writing o# this paper has been a #ar more manageable task because o#
her guidance. 4 would also like to thank the other members o# m" thesis committee.
)ro#essor Emma Scioli has o##ered a great deal o# support throughout the entire project-
but 4 am especiall" appreciati%e o# the man" comments she has pro%ided on the topics o#
ekphrasis and dreams. )ro#essor Michael Shaw has o##ered encouragement and man"
constructi%e comments resulting in a much more polished #inal paper. 4 must also o##er
one #inal thank "ou to m" #riends and #amil" members who ha%e a heard a great deal
more about Herodas and his mimes than the" might e%er ha%e e2pected.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 6/95
v
Table of Contents
4ntroduction.........................................................................................................................../
Chapter /+ Herodas and the 4ambic Connection to Ethical and Aesthetic Criticism .........5/./+ 4ntroduction................................................................................................................5/.,+ 1he Mimes o# Herodas...............................................................................................6
Chapter ,+ Aesthetic Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi ....................................................//,./+ Mimiamb Eight.........................................................................................................//,.,+ *ream 4nterpretation ............................................................................................./7,.,./+ Herodas and the Mouseion.................................................................................../6,.0+ 1he )rogrammatic Signi#icance o# Mimiamb Eight...............................................,0,.5+ Herodas as Hipponactean Aesthetic Critic in Mimiamb !our..............................,8,.9+ Contemporar" Criticism and Aesthetic :alues in Mimiamb !our........................,7,.9./+ &"nno and &okkale's 1echnical :ocabular" .......................................................00
,.9.,+ Mimiamb !our's 4nterest in :erisimilitude .......................................................05,.8+ &"nno and &okkale as Anti;Models #or how to <ead Herodas..............................5/,.=+ Aesthetic Criticism in Mimiamb Si2.......................................................................98,.7+ Conclusion...............................................................................................................8
Chapter 0+ Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi .......................................................8,0./+ 1he eneric 4nterest o# Iambos in Ethical Criticism..............................................8,0.,+ Ethical Statements in Herodas................................................................................8=0.,./+ Mimiamb 1hree and )arent;Child <elationships...............................................870.,.,+ Mimiamb !i%e and the Status o# Sla%es...............................................................=,0.,.0+ Mimiamb >ne and !emale !idelit".....................................................................=80.0+ Conclusion................................................................................................................=6
Conclusion...........................................................................................................................7/ 3orks Cited.........................................................................................................................75
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 7/95
1
Introduction
Scholarship on the trio o# de#initi%e Hellenistic authors o# poetr"- Callimachus-
Apollonius o# <hodes- and 1heocritus- ine%itabl" must address the comple2it" o# these
poets- their learnedness- allusi%eness- and sel#;awareness o# their position as poet and
the cra#t the" practice. 1heir st"le de#ines what we modern scholars think o# as
Hellenistic poetr". 4t is with an understanding o# the basic idea o# Hellenistic poetr" and
the poetic %oice o# this era that 4 approached the mimes o# Herodas- a relati%el" obscure
author who probabl" wrote during the rule o# )tolem" 44 )hiladelphus. As 4 proceeded
to read the roughl" 7 lines that ha%e sur%i%ed- se%en mimes almost #ull" preser%ed- an
eighth that is mostl" preser%ed- and %er" small #ragments o# se%eral more mimes- 4 was
struck b" the subtlet" o# his poetr". E%er present in Herodas' short scenes is a tension
that begs to be e2plored. ?ow;class characters using %ulgar language in scenes
reminiscent o# those #amiliar #rom the comic stages o# both reece and <ome were
consistentl" touching on serious topics o# great interest. 3ith m" own interest piued- 4
dipped into the scholarship #ocused on Herodas' mimes that had been penned o%er the
course o# the last centur" #ollowing the disco%er" and publication o# the mimiamboi in
/76/ b" !.. &en"on- the great British paleographer to whom we also owe the #irst
edition o# Aristotle's Athenaion Politeia. 4n sur%e"ing past scholarship 4 was struck b"
the tendenc" to #ocus on indi%idual mimes and uestions o# per#ormance at the e2pense
o# recogni@ing the subtle comple2it" o# the mimes as a whole. 4t is in hopes o# bringing
this comple2it" to the #ore#ront that 4 ha%e written this paper.
1he primar" objecti%e o# this thesis is to demonstrate that Herodas' mimes
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 8/95
2
consistentl" #eature serious commentar" on ele%ated topics that o#ten appear at odds
with his humorous characters and scenes. )er%asi%e throughout the mimes are
statements %oicing ethical and aesthetic criticism. Such statements demonstrate an
interest in the poet's cra#t and reception o# poetr"- and also an awareness o# moral and
philosophical topics o# considerable importance and rele%ance to his audience. 1he
presence o# these ele%ated concerns demands that Herodas be recogni@ed as more than
just a %ulgar- comic wit.
Central to m" argument that Herodas gi%es %oice to ethical and aesthetic
criticism is showing that he locates himsel# within the iambic tradition- and that such
statements are an important part o# the iambic genre as a whole. 4 will begin b" o##ering
a brie# sur%e" o# e%idence showing that iambos is an appropriate genre #or ethical and
aesthetic criticism- and that e2amples o# both t"pes o# criticism can be #ound in iambic
poetr" o# both the Archaic and Hellenistic periods. 3ith the connection between iambic
poetr" and ethicalaesthetic criticism established- 4 will demonstrate that Herodas
#irml" places himsel# in the iambic tradition. As e%idence #or this- 4 will e2amine in #ull
the eighth mimiamb- which 4 will argue is a programmatic piece designed both as a
response to criticism #rom Herodas' peers and as an appeal to the authorit" o# his
literar" predecessors necessar" to legitimi@e his new genre. Ha%ing established Herodas'
connection to iambos and demonstrated the genre's interest in ethical and aesthetic
criticism- 4 will then turn to e2amples o# such #orms o# criticism throughout the mimes.
>ne chapter will be de%oted to aesthetic criticism- #ocusing particularl" on the #ourth
mime. A second chapter will address ethical criticism- e2amples o# which tend to be
more obscured and #leeting when compared to statements o# aesthetic criticism. 1hese
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 9/95
3
two chapters together should #ull" demonstrate Herodas' interest in ele%ated topics.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 10/95
4
Chapter 1: Herodas and the Iambic Connection to Ethical and Aesthetic Criticism
1.1: Introduction
1he archaic genre o# iambos e2perienced a re%i%al among Hellenistic poets and
authors.1 Apollonius o# <hodes and other ancient scholars wrote works on the histor" o#
the genre as a whole- and collected- edited- and studied the poems o# indi%idual
iambographers- including Archilochus- Hippona2- and Semonides.2 1he meters and
themes o# archaic iambic poetr" were adopted and re;worked b" a %ariet" o# authors-
including Callimachus and Herodas- both o# whom will be discussed more #ull" below.3
># the canonical iambic poets- Hippona2 in particular recei%ed pre#erential treatment in
the Hellenistic age. Both Herodas and Callimachus openl" adopted Hippona2 as their
model- and a third poet- )hoeni2- was clearl" and hea%il" in#luenced b" the works o#
Hippona2. Callimachus and Herodas are especiall" deser%ing o# closer stud"- because
not onl" did the" both write choliambic poetr"- but the" also both claimed to ha%e been
directl" in#luenced b" Hippona2 and st"led themsel%es as his literar" descendants.
1he Hipponactean corpus- consisting o# poems composed in the 8th centur" BCE-
/ Scodel ,/ brie#l" discusses the re%i%al o# iambic poetr" and the general in#luence o# philosoph" onthe genre. She e2amines the sur%i%ing iamboi o# )hoeni2- Callimachus- and Cercidas in particular.
, See <otstein ,/- //,;/5= #or a detailed e2amination o# the reception and stud" o# iambic poetr"#rom the #i#th;centur" and be"ond. 1he grammarian *iomedes authored a stud" o# the iambic genre.
Apollonius o# <hodes produced a work on Archilochus. 1here is a re#erence to an edited edition o#Hippona2 b" Hermippus o# Sm"rna in a ,nd centur" CE source. See also <otstein ,6n/0 #or adiscussion o# the e%idence o# edited editions o# Archilochus- Hippona2- and Semonides produced inthe ,nd or 0rd centuries BCE.
0 E2amples o# Hellenistic iambic poets include ob%ious #igures such as Callimachus and Herodas- butalso more obscure indi%iduals. Cercidas wrote meliambs- a combination o# melic and iambic poetr".)hoeni2 o# Colophon- roughl" contemporar" with Callimachus- adopted Hippona2 as a model #or hisiambic poetr"D see Scodel ,/- ,9,; ,99 #or a brie# discussion o# )hoeni2' poetr". Macho wroteiambics with a moral and philosophical message. See also <otstein ,/- 9/;9= #or %er" brie#discussion o# se%eral other iambic poets.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 11/95
5
is un#ortunatel" ill preser%ed. Almost all sur%i%ing #ragments are in the choliambic
meter- which would later be adopted b" )hoeni2- Callimachus- and Herodas. !rom the
e2tant #ragments it is e%ident that Hippona2' poems were largel" concerned with con#lict
between the poetic persona and an FGI that o#ten resulted in a scathing- %iciousἐ
attack issued b" the poet.4 Hippona2 o#ten re#ers to himsel# b" name in his poems- and
tends to present himsel# as a %iolent drunkard.5 1he targets o# his in%ecti%e pieces are
%aried- but three names are o# special interest+ Boupalus- Athenis- and Mimnes.
Benjamin Acosta;Hughes has anal"@ed the treatment o# these three characters in
Hippona2- pa"ing particular attention to the #act that all three were artists.6 Clear
in%ecti%e attacks against Boupalus and Mimnes are preser%ed in #ragments- while
Athenis is mentioned onl" once in an unclear conte2t. 4n the case o# Mimnes- Hippona2'
poetic wrath was inspired b" the artist's #ailure to paint a ship properl".7 Athenis and
Boupalus are connected in a stor" that sur%i%es onl" in the testimonia to Hippona2' li#e-
in which it is related that the pair had sculpted a statue o# Hippona2 that o##ended him.8
4n response to the sculpture- he composed such %icious poetic attacks that the sculptors
chose to commit suicide. 3hile Athenis is mentioned onl" once in the e2tant #ragments
*egani !r. =- his #ellow sculptor- Boupalus- appears se%eral times as the subject o#
5 Bowie ,/- ,8 has identi#ied the #ollowing as general #eatures o# iambic poetr"+ Jnarrati%eDspeeches embedded in narrati%eD KLI %ituperation ND sel#;de#ence that naturall" led to criticism o#
othersD just occasionall" re#lection or e2hortation.O ># these #eatures- %ituperation and narrati%e areespeciall" prominent in Hippona2. E2amples o# sel#;de#ense are e%ident in his attacks on Athenis-Boupalus- and Mimnes. <osen /677- 0 identi#ies the Jantagonism between poetO and enem"- whichresults in a psogos- as the main #eature o# iambic poetr".
9 Bowie ,/- /;//.8 Hughes /668.= *egani !r. 06.7 Bowie ,/- 6;// o##ers a brie# account o# the con#lict- as does Hughes /668. <osen /677
identi#ies the se2ual connotation o# Boupalus' name and its importance to how Hippona2 portra"edBoupalus in his poems.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 12/95
6
in%ecti%e lines.9 Acosta;Hughes has persuasi%el" argued based on e%idence #rom the
testimonia and sur%i%ing #ragments #eaturing in%ecti%e %erses directed against these
artists that Hippona2 Jpresents himsel# as a critic o# aestheticsO and ethical beha%ior.10
As such a critic- Hippona2 will pro%e %er" in#luential on later Hellenistic iambographers.
Hellenistic poets sei@ed on the Hipponactean persona as an authoritati%e %oice
#or ethical and aesthetic criticism. Herodas and Callimachus both st"led themsel%es as
the heirs o# Hippona2.11 3hile there is no declaration o# an e2plicit connection to
Hippona2- the poetr" o# )hoeni2 is also #illed with language and themes clearl"
borrowed #rom the earlier iambographer.12 E2amination o# the choliambic poems o#
Callimachus- )hoeni2- and Herodas re%eals that the iambic genre in general was suited
#or ethical and aesthetic criticism- and that appeals to the language- themes- and poetic
structures #ound in Hippona2 lent authorit" to ethical and aesthetic judgments made b"
Hellenistic poets. !or Herodas- in particular- the authorit" o# a Hipponactean persona
will be critical #or de#ining and de#ending his own poetr"D this will become e%ident in the
ne2t chapter. 4t is important to recogni@e that ele%ated criticism was %er" much a part o#
the iambic genre- and that iambic poems must not be dismissed as simple JlowO pieces
6 See *egani's inde2 #or #ragments where Boupalus appears. According to *egani- he is mentioned /,times. 1his is an impressi%e number when one considers the #ragmentar" nature o# the Hipponacteancorpus and the relati%el" small amount o# poems that ha%e come down to us.
/ Hughes /668- ,//;,/,. Hutchinson /677- 56 claims that Hippona2' poems were not inspired b" an" Jmoral indignation-O but were simpl" intended to entertain. He does- howe%er- note that later poets
writing iamboi did address moral issues. 4 belie%e Hutchinson is essentiall" correct in that the point o#
Hippona2' poem ma" not ha%e been moral or aesthetic criticism. Still- just b" issuing in%ecti%estatements #ocusing on an indi%idual's moral #ailings Hippona2 is embracing one set o# ethical %aluesand rejecting another. A help#ul %iew o# in%ecti%e poetr" is o##ered b" Pappa /666- who notes thatin%ecti%e poetr" is concerned primaril" with Jthe e2clusion o# certain indi%iduals- actions- groups- orualities- and there#ore it seeks to de#ine the communit" to which the speaker belongs.O
// See Callimachus' #irst and thirteenth iambs and Herodas' eighth mime. 4n all three poems clearre#erences are made to Hippona2. 4t can be no small coincidence that all three o# these poems are alsoimportant programmatic pieces in their respecti%e authors' corpora.
/, Scodel ,/- ,9,;,99 brie#l" touches on the e%ocation o# Hippona2 in the sur%i%ing poems o#)hoeni2.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 13/95
7
aimed at entertaining an audience or denigrating an opponent. A brie# look at two
iambic poems o# Callimachus will ser%e as e%idence #or this claim.
1he in#luence o# Hippona2 on Callimachus has alread" been well studied.13 His
name appears in the #irst o# Callimachus' iamboi, where he rises #rom the $nderworld to
speak to Callimachus' critics. 1he language o# the Callimachean Hippona2 is more
re#ined and less %ulgar than the original. 1he #igure o# Hippona2 himsel# highlights this
change- when he sa"s that he has not come to sing o# his battle with Boupalus QR Nἥ
TGRU VWXU WZU [\]U^Vἴ ὐ ἀ ^ Uὴ X_`[U- lines /;5- but declares that he has
instead come #or a much more striking and important reason+ to end stri#e and en%"
between the scholars he has summoned.14 Callimachus has chosen to #oreground
Hippona2 as a character in his poem to aid in de#ining the poetic program that he will
#ollow in his iambic poems- and to encourage an" potential critics to respond peace#ull"
to his poetr"- perhaps in anticipation o# the negati%e reactions he will later encounter.15
Herodas- too- will #eature Hippona2 in his eighth mime- but unlike Callimachus will do
so in response to criticism rather than in anticipation.
1here is another re#erence to Hippona2 in Callimachus' thirteenth iamb- where
the poetic persona presumabl" Callimachus himsel# twice re#ers to Ephesus- where
Hippona2 li%ed until being e2pelled- according to the Suda- as the homeland o#
choliambic %erses lines /0;/5 and 80;88. Another re#erence to Hippona2 ma" be #ound
/0 See Edmunds ,/D Hughes /668D &erkhecker /666 on 4ambs 4- :- and 444D Hutchinson /677-57##.D Acosta;Hughes ,,- ,/;/0.
/5 &erkhecker /666- 05;09. 1he reason #or Hippona2' coming is #ound in the Diegesis- and is not madee2plicit in the e2tant #ragments. Still- the authoritati%e %oice o# Hippona2 does shine through in thesur%i%ing #ragments. He commands the gathered crowd to be silent R` L[UTFR-ὴ line 0/ and to
write down his speech QV LG[F[ ̂ U U- ὶ ὴ ῥῆ line 0/./9 &erkhecker /666- 57.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 14/95
8
in line = i# Acosta;Hughes' reading o# ̂ WU[ U is accepted. ῖ 16 1he conte2t o# the
allusions to Hippona2 in this poem is again- as in the #irst iamb- that o# stri#e between
poets- probabl" Callimachus and his critics- whose disagreement had reached the point
o# ph"sical %iolence ] I I QTGVI ̂ [FfWR^Vἀ ὸ ἐ Q^TRU ] - lines 9,;90. !acingἀ ῷ
criticism- Callimachus appeals to Hippona2 as an iambic authorit"- just as Herodas will
later do himsel#. 1he elements o# aesthetic criticism in Hippona2' iamboi make him an
especiall" appropriate model #or Callimachus to use when de#ending his own poetr".
Such a de#ense must naturall" include aesthetic judgments o# his critics' own poetr" or
their aesthetic %alues. 1he peace#ul reception ad%ocated b" Hippona2 in Callimachus'
#irst iamb has not occurred- and so in the thirteenth iamb Callimachus naturall" returns
to the Hipponactean persona to %oice a response to his critics and a de#ense o# his own
works. 1he closing lines o# the thirteenth iamb ha%e a bite that is reminiscent o#
Hippona2' own in%ecti%e and largel" absent #rom Callimachus' other iambic poems. 17
1wo conclusions can be drawn #rom Callimachus' iamboi that will pro%e
important #or anal"sis o# Herodas' mimiamboi . !irst- it is clear #rom allusi%e language
and direct re#erences that Hippona2 was esteemed b" Callimachus as an iambic
authorit" and e2erted considerable in#luence on Callimachus' own iamboi . Second-
re#erences to Hippona2 and his poetr" were considered especiall" appropriate b"
Callimachus in the conte2t o# aesthetic criticism and de#ense o# his own poetr"./7
/8 Hughes /668- ,/0;,/9 argues that ̂ WU[ U should be read instead o# the traditional \WU[GWI. ῖ&erkhecker /666 does not seem to be aware o# this suggested reading. He #ollows )#ei##er's readingo# \WU[GWI.ὁ
/= &erkhecker /666- ,8= writes that beginning at line 80 Jthe #ocus narrows- and it becomes clear thatall the high;minded sermoni@ing has an 4ambic sting in its tail. 1his is- a#ter all- about sel#;de#ence-and it gi%es a certain mischie%ous pleasure to see Callimachus lea%e the moral high ground toestablish his own claims and make his ad%ersar" eat his words.O
/7 Callimachus is- howe%er- care#ul to clari#" that he is not a mere imitator o# Hippona2. 3hile he doesemplo" the Hipponactean persona as an authorit" #or his own programmatic poems interested in
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 15/95
9
Callimachus accepted iambic poetr" in general and the Hipponactean strain in
particular as an appropriate genre #or aesthetic criticism. 1he pre%alence o# this #orm o#
criticism helps ensure that Callimachus' poems are raised #rom the t"pical JlowO subject
matter associated with iambic poetr" to a more ele%ated- philosophical le%el- and
demands that the audience take him and his poetr" more seriousl". 1his contrast
between a JlowO genre and serious contemplation o# art and ethics becomes e%en more
striking in Herodas- whose %ulgar characters and scenes are uite consistent with the
t"pical e2pectations o# iambic poetr" and mime- but are o#ten used to raise uestions o#
contemporar" art criticism and ethical dilemmas that seem out o# place in such a JlowO
genre.
1.2: The imes of Herodas
4t is now time to consider directl" the mimes o# Herodas. 1hroughout the late /6th
and earl" ,th centuries most scholarship presented Herodas' mimes as %ulgar- comic
sketches intended primaril" #or entertainment./6 1his %iew has continued to e2ist due in
no small part to the #ailure to recogni@e that the same concern with aesthetics and ethics
#ound in Callimachus is also present in Herodas. 1his interest should not be surprising i#
one recogni@es that both Herodas and Callimachus adopt Hippona2 as their model. 1he
aesthetics- he also is sure to emphasi@e the uniueness o# his own brand o# iambos. See Acosta;Hughes ,,- 76;6/ #or a succinct summar" o# the %iew o# Callimachus that emerges #rom the #irstand thirteenth iambs. Brie#l"- in Acosta;Hughes' %iew the #irst iamb Jcon#irms Callimachus as aHipponactean %oice-O while the thirteenth iamb is an Ja##irmation o# his di##erent- distanced iambic
%oice.O/6 !or an e2treme e2ample o# this %iew- see *a%enport /67/- i2;2i%- who imagines the mimes being
per#ormed on the street with the help o# props. 4n his %iew- Herodas' mimes Jare not comedies- butcomic moments-O and his characters J#ools.O >n the tone o# the mime- Pairn /65- 2i writes that the" are J%ulgar- sordid- e%en %icious.O
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 16/95
10
perception o# Hippona2 as an aesthetic and ethical critic has alread" been adeuatel"
demonstrated b" Acosta;Hughes- as discussed abo%e. 4# Herodas openl" adopts
Hippona2 as his model- and it will soon become clear that he does- in #act- do so- then
the presence o# aesthetic and ethical criticism in his mimes is not onl" appropriate- but
should perhaps e%en be e2pected.20
Ha%ing considered the literar" tradition #rom which Herodas' mimiamboi
descend- 4 will now look at elements o# aesthetic criticism in his mimes. M" anal"sis will
proceed #rom the assumption that it is accepted that the importance o# aesthetic and
ethical criticism is inherent in the iambic genre- as discussed abo%e. 4n the case o# a
skeptical reader who does not accept this assumption- howe%er- 4 hope to show that
aesthetic criticism #eatures prominentl" in the sur%i%ing mimes o# Herodas- e%en i# one
does not accept that this is an e2pected element o# the iambic genre within which he
works. 4 will #irst begin with anal"sis o# the eighth mimiamb- in which Herodas makes
clear his connection to Hippona2 and consciousl" locates his poetr" in relation to
traditional classi#ication categories. 4 will then mo%e to mimes in which aesthetic
criticism is clearl" present- primaril" mimes #our- si2- and se%en.
, Hughes /668- ,8 clearl" recogni@es that the mimes o# Herodas #it into the Jtradition o# ethical andcritical commentar"-O but chooses to #ocus on the iamboi o# Callimachus. Hughes' identi#ication o#elements o# aesthetic and ethical criticism in iambic poetr" and his o##hand re#erence to Herodasinspired the general direction o# this paper.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 17/95
11
Chapter 2: Aesthetic Criticism in Herodas! Mimiamboi
2.1: Mimiamb Eight
An" argument #ocusing on elements o# aesthetic criticism in Herodas' mimes
ought to start with the eighth mimiambos. 4t is in this mime that Herodas openl"
declares himsel# a #ollower o# Hippona2 and directl" addresses critics o# his poetr". 1his
mime is- then- the best e%idence we ha%e #or how Herodas %iewed himsel# and the genre
mimiambos he had created. 1he eighth mime is #ragmentar" and the absence o# ke"
passages makes interpretation di##icult and at times contro%ersial. *espite these
shortcomings- the poem is a clear comment issued b" the poet intended to de#end his
mimes #rom critics and de#ine his in#luences. 4n this sense it is a programmatic piece
that inherentl" addresses poetic aesthetics- similar in man" wa"s to the #irst and
thirteenth iambs o# Callimachus discussed abo%e. 1he primar" di##erence between
Callimachus' #irst iamb and the eighth mime o# Herodas is the position o# each poem in
the o%erall corpus o# the author. Callimachus' poem opens his book o# iambs and is an
earl" attempt to de#ine his poetic program in anticipation o# the response with which it
will meet. Herodas' eighth mime- howe%er- appears to be a response to criticism that he
has alread" recei%ed. Herodas will appeal to Hippona2 as an iambic authorit" to de#end
himsel# and his poetr".
1he eighth mimiambos opens with the narrator presumed to be Herodas
himsel# rousing his sleeping sla%es lines /;/5. >ne sla%e in particular- Annas- is
singled out to hear a dream that is related in lines /8;85. 1he dream opens with the
narrator dragging a goat ^GLU- line /8. ?ines ,;06 are badl" damaged- though a #ew
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 18/95
12
obser%ations can be made. 1he narrator appears to ha%e been engaged in a con#lict with
some goatherds V `- line ,. A man appears dressed in a spotted #awnskinἰ
^Q^ῆI U[XGῦ VU]\ - line 0- wearing a cluster o# i%" QG_WXV ... Q\'- line 0,ῳ
and boots QFGU_- line 00. Most modern scholars assume this man to be *ion"sus-
as his st"le o# dress is consistent with depictions and descriptions o# the god in other
sources. ?ines 00;06 are poorl" preser%ed- but there is a clear re#erence to >d"sseus and
Aeolus' gi#t to him o# the bag o# winds _ ] GU- line 0=. 1he speaker thenἰ ῶ
e2plains how he competed in the askoliasmos, and seems to ha%e emerged %ictorious
5;5=. ?ines 57;9= are completel" missing.
3hen the narrati%e resumes at line 97- a new character has appeared+ an old man
threatening to strike the narrator with his sta## ^ XV^ZG\ῇ ῃ QKR- line 8. 1he
narrator addresses the crowd assembled in his dream `VG[U^[I- line 8/D these areὦ
presumabl" the goatherds #rom line , unless a new group o# characters has been
introduced and calls on the "oung man again- presumabl" *ion"sus to witness the old
man's aggression. 1here is a brie# pause in the description o# the dream lines 89;88-
and then the narrator presents his interpretation lines 8=;=6. 1he lines o##ering the
interpretation present some di##iculties- but this passage will ne%ertheless pro%e to be
especiall" important. He predicts that man" among the Muses will pluck his corpus and
labors ^ WT[V ̀ QG^V ̂ I W I WF_I ̂ [ U U fὰ ὶ ὺ ἐ ὺ ῦ ἐ ῃU- lines =,.21
He claims to ha%e won a pri@e ^ [FU- line =0 competing in theὸ ἄ askoliasmos,
although he accomplished it together with the angr" old man Q ^ LTGU^ fU `GZ'ἠ ῷ ἔ
,/ 4 ha%e taken the translation o# corpus #or ^ WT[V #rom anker ,6. 1his best captures the dualὰsense o# the word WT[V as both a ph"sical bod" and the poetic bod" o# work.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 19/95
13
GUFTU^- line =9. He mentionsὀ QTI line =8- though the conte2t is not entirel" clear.
!inall" he makes the claim that he has learned to sing choliambic poetr" #ollowing
Hippona2 W[^ ``UVQ^V ̂ U `VV ^ Qf [\][U- lines =7;=6. Here the narrati%eἸ ὸ ὰ ἀ
o# the mime ends and uestions o# interpretation begin.
1he eighth mime has long been %iewed as Herodas' attempt to de#ine the new
genre he has in%ented and de#end his poetr" #rom criticism.22 1here ha%e been no
serious e##orts to debunk this %iew. An" scholarl" disputes in%ol%ing this mime tend to
#ocus on subtle di##erences in interpretation. As 4 am interested primaril" in the
elements o# aesthetic criticism and connections to Hippona2 that are e%ident in this
poem- 4 will largel" sidestep such debate- e2cept where directl" rele%ant to
understanding the aesthetic stance adopted b" Herodas in this mime.
1he narrati%e structure o# the mime an indi%idual recounting a dream in which
he encounters an earlier poet or the Muses was a common literar" topos among
Hellenistic poets.23 An educated audience- whether readers or %iewers- would ha%e
understood the dream setting as an earl" signal that this particular mimambos will in
some wa" e2amine Herodas as a poet and his work. 4t is- there#ore- appropriate to
e2plore the s"mbolic meanings o# the characters- scenes- and objects in the mime. 1he
narrator- in the guise o# a simple rustic character- can be identi#ied with Herodas.24 1he
goatherds who ha%e attacked him he claims to ha%e been beaten+ RWV- line /6ἔ
,, See Cunningham /6=/- /65D <osen /66,D <ist /66=D !ountoulakis ,,D anker ,6- ,,5;,,8 and ,00;,09D Mastromarco /675.
,0 1he most notable Hellenistic e2ample is Callimachus. 1his topos ma" be traced back to Hesiod. Aninteresting <oman parallel is #ound in Ennius- who claims to ha%e been inspired in a dream b"Homer. A dream also appears in 1heocritus- Idyll ,/. Bion's dream !r. /- ow /686 #eaturesinteraction between the persona and Eros. >n this see ut@willer ,=- 68.
,5 1his identi#ication has long been accepted. See Headlam and &no2 /6,,- lii;l%iD Cunningham /6=/-/65D anker ,6- ,,5;,8 and ,00;09.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 20/95
14
should be identi#ied with the critics o# his poetr". Attempts ha%e been made to connect
the goatherds to speci#ic contemporar" poets- such as Callimachus or 1heocritus- or
their #ollowers- but such postulations are impossible to con#irm. 1he ne2t character to
appear is easil" identi#ied as *ion"sus- or at least a representati%e o# the god- b" the
clothing he is wearing- o# which his st"le o# #ootwear- the QFGUI- will pro%e
particularl" important in making this connection. Herodas and the goatherds then
engage in the askoliasmos- a rite associated with the rural *ion"sia.25
A clear connection to *ion"sus and dramatic per#ormance is e%ident throughout
the dream. 1he goat the narrator is dragging- the appearance o# *ion"sus in general and
the speci#ic re#erence to him wearing the QFGUI- a st"le o# boot representati%e o#
traged"- and the per#ormance o# a *ion"sian ritual- the askoliasmos- all point to a
dramatic conte2t or connection.26 1he re#erences to the goat and the QFGUI o#
*ion"sus are ma"be indicati%e o# a tragic connection speci#icall"- not just a general
dramatic connection.,= Andreas !ountoulakis has proposed that Herodas is tr"ing to
con%ince his audience that the origins o# mime are connected to poetr" sanctioned b"
*ion"sus- and in doing so Jin%est his poetr" with the authorit" and prestigeO granted to
dramatic poetr".28 1his is necessar" because mime was t"picall" considered a low #orm
,9 ones ,5- /5,;/55.,8 !urther e%idence o# a connection to *ion"sus can be #ound in the narrator's interpretation o# the
dream- when he re#ers to goatherds %iolentl" cutting up the goat Q X\ZI ]V^G[ U^- line 86. 4tἐ ἐ ῦ has been proposed that this ma" be a re#erence to the sparagmos associated with *ion"sus- as seen inEuripides' Bacchae. <ist /66=- 09= rejects this interpretation correctl" in m" opinion. 4 do-howe%er- belie%e that the scene still has clear connections to *ion"sus. Herodas considers the cuttingo# the goat a per#ormance o# rites ^ UF[V ̂ [[ U^[I- line =- which is supporti%e o# a ritual conte2t.ὰ ἔ ῦ
,= See &irb" ,5- /=/ #or both a brie# summar" o# popular proposals concerning the linguisticconnections between the words tragos goat and tragoedia traged"- and also other possibilitiese2plaining the origins o# the word tragoedia. See Headlam and &no2 /6,,- on line 00 #or discussiono# the QFGUI and its connection to *ion"sus.
,7 !ountoulakis ,,- 0/.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 21/95
15
o# entertainment. 1he widespread negati%e %iew o# non;literar" mime ma" also ha%e
been taken o# Herodas' poetr" i# he could not con%ince his audience o# connections to a
more respected genre- such as traged".29 E%en i# !ountoulakis' interpretation is rejected-
it seems clear that Herodas in%okes *ion"sus primaril" to earn credibilit" #or himsel#D
whether this is because mime has *ion"siac origins is not a critical issue. 1hat *ion"sus
sanctions his poetr" is clear both #rom Herodas' re#erring to the goat- which is
understood to be representati%e o# his poetr"-30 as a gi#t #rom *ion"sus ] GU Qῶ ἐ
RUf_- line 87- and the claim that he recei%ed a pri@e [FU- line =0 #or hisἄ
success in the askoliasmos.
3hile the presence o# *ion"sus is intended to grant authorit" to Herodas' poetr"-
the uarrel with the unnamed LTGRU presents a more di##icult challenge. 1he #irst
uestion that must be answered concerns the identit" o# the old man- who #irst appears
and speaks in the e2tant te2t at line 96 and is again mentioned near the end o# the
mime at line =9. *oubtlessl" he would ha%e #irst appeared somewhere in the lines
preceding his speech 57;9=- but these are missing. Scholarl" consensus is hea%il" in
#a%or o# identi#"ing the old man as Hippona2- though Archilochus has also been
proposed as a possibilit".31 1he strongest piece o# e%idence encouraging the
,6 anker ,6- ,09n6 #inds this proposal Jattracti%eO but sa"s that more e%idence is needed to showthat there was a connection between *ion"sus and mime in the 0 rd centur". 3hile 4 belie%e anker iscorrect in holding some reser%ations- !ountoulakis is %er" clear in stating that it was Herodas' goal to
con%ince his audience o# this connection- not that the connection had earlier been made or won widespread appro%al. 1hat the %iew e%entuall" won out is shown b" !ountoulakis ,,- 0//;/0.
0 See <ist /66=- 097D !ountoulakis ,,- 00D <osen /66,- ,8D Cunningham /6=/- /60.0/ See <ist /66= #or the argument in #a%or o# Archilochus. 4 am largel" uncon%inced b" her claims-
which are predicated on the belie# that be#ore writing choliambic poetr" Herodas had written iambicin%ecti%e in the st"le o# Archilochus. 3hile this is certainl" possible- it makes little sense to include are#erence to Archilochus in a piece dedicated to de#ining the poetic programs o# his choliambic mimes.1he list o# scholars who support identi#"ing the old man with Hippona2 is length"- but see &no2/6,9 and anker ,6 #or both an earl" and late %iew o# such an identi#ication. &no2 is largel"responding to Her@og /6,5.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 22/95
16
identi#ication with Hippona2 is the use o# a phrase at the end o# line 8 ̂ XV^ZG\ῇ ῃ
QKR that parallels a sur%i%ing #ragment o# the iambic poet ^ XVQ^ZG\ QKV-ῇ ῃ
*egani !r. 7- 3est !r. ,.32 1he description o# the old man as angered GUFTU^- lineὀ
=9 lends some additional support to this identi#ication- as Hippona2 was generall"
regarded as a cantankerous- %iolent old man in the Hellenistic age.33
1here is- howe%er- a problem with this identi#ication that was recogni@ed b"
Cunningham.34 3h" does Hippona2 uarrel with Herodas- who %iews himsel# as a
#ollower o# the iambographer 1he answer ma" lie in the dual nature o# the new genre.
Herodas is not writing choliambic poetr" directl" deri%ed or descended #rom Hippona2'
in%ecti%e- but a new #orm o# poetr" that has resulted #rom #using together mimos and
iambos. Hippona2 is e%identl" displeased with the resulting mimiambos- and so
%iolentl" attacks the "ounger Herodas.35 1he narrator addresses the onlookers ὦ
`VG[U^[I- line 8/ and then calls upon the "oung man *ion"sus to witness his
treatment at the hands o# the old man WVG^fGWV ] ^ U U[ZU\ZU- line 80. 1heὲ ὸ
language here is reminiscent o# the ancient custom o# calling on b"standers to obser%e a
crime- so as to secure witnesses #or a trial.36 Such language is appropriate here as the old
man and Herodas are about to be judged b" *ion"sus.37
0, anker ,6- ,0/ e2plains Herodas' e2clusion o# the kappa as a Jlearned rationali@ation o# the shortV in Hippona2' XVQ^ZG\ .O Cunningham /6=/ o##ers a similar e2planation.ῃ
00 *egani /675.
05 Cunningham /6=/- /65.09 !or rele%ant discussion see <osen /66,- ,/,- who makes a similar point. !ountoulakis ,,- 0/
responds to <osen b" arguing that Hippona2 would not be angr" with Herodas #or mi2ing iambicpoetr" with dramatic poetr"- since drama was a well respected genre. 4nstead- Hippona2 is angr"
because Herodas has combined iambic poetr" with mime- which was held in low esteem.08 !ountoulakis ,- ,7.0= >ne pu@@ling aspect that 4 ha%e not seen addressed is the uestion o# wh" Herodas would call on the
goatherds- who ha%e been understood as his ri%als- as potential supporters in the e%ent o# a trial. Arethe goatherds and Herodas reconciled a#ter his success#ul e##orts in the askoliasmos Has hecon%inced them o# his poetic skills
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 23/95
17
!ull understanding o# the judgment o# *ion"sus at line 85 ] [ `[U WR ̂ Uὀ ἶ ἄ ὸ
]GTV ... is just barel" out o# our grasp. 1he end o# the line is missing- as are the details
#rom the ten lines preceding Hippona2' speech 57;9=. 1he ke" to making sense o# the
"oung man's judgment is probabl" a missing %erb that takes ]GTV- which can be
interpreted two wa"s- as its object. 1his noun is either best translated as Jthe skinnerO or
Jthe #la"erO #rom ]G[fI-38 or as a #orm o# ]G- JskinO or Jhide.O39 4 will %er" cautiousl"
argue #or the second option.40 4# this %iew is adopted- the passage would be translated as+
JAnd he said that we both missing verbq the hide.O An in#initi%e o# some sort would
then be e2pected- probabl" suggesting that the hide was to be gi%en to or shared b" both
the narrator and the old man. 4 ha%e adopted this %iew based on the narrator's
interpretation o# the dream in lines 8=;86. He sa"s that he alone o# all those trampling
the wine skin had won the pri@e =;=/- e%en i# he had accomplished it together with the
old man Q ^ LTGU ̂ fU `GZV- line =9. 1his statement suggests that the" had aἠ ῷ ἔ
shared accomplishment. 4# the ]GTV mentioned at line 85 is understood as the skin
gi%en as a pri@e- then the narrator's remark at line =9 is clari#ied.41 1he shared
accomplishment mentioned b" the narrator is a re#erence to their poetic success. Both
07 anker ,6 translates it as #la"er- interpreting it as a nomen agentis. 4t is translated as Jthe o##icerOin the /6,, Headlam and &no2 edition- which is e2plained b" a note ad loc.
06 See Cunningham /6=/- ad loc.5 <osen /66, and )isani /69, both support this reading.5/ >ne other proposal is put #orth in Headlam and &no2 that ma" make some sense- but can- 4 belie%e-
be dismissed. 1he noun ]GTV can be translated as J#la"erO as discussed abo%e- and in this sense ma"
re#er to a whipping. 1he legal nature o# the scene signaled b" `VG[U^[I and WVG^fGWV mightὦencourage such a translation. See Headlam and &no2 /6,,- 065;69 #or discussion o# the legallanguage. 1he major problem with this reading is that the remaining lines o# the poem make nore#erence to the old man and Herodas sharing in an" sort o# a whipping or punishment. 1he onl" actthe" ha%e shared in has a positi%e connotation- and is much more likel" to re#er to their shared successin either the askoliasmos or their sharing o# *ion"sus' appro%al. Since the end o# the poem is #airl"
well preser%ed with onl" a #ew endings to certain lines missing- there is no possible place at the end o#the poem where a punishment scene could ha%e occurred. ># course- the scene need not actuall" takeplace in the dream- as the narrator has woken up- but an allusion to it would be e2pected somewherein the remaining lines o# the mime.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 24/95
18
were awarded the hide b" *ion"sus- signaling that both ha%e his appro%al. 1he
importance o# securing *ion"sus' appro%al has been discussed abo%e- but to restate it
simpl"- the awarding o# a pri@e b" *ion"sus grants authorit" to Herodas' poetr" and
%alidates the new genre. 1his %alidation is critical to de#ending himsel# #rom his
detractors' attacks.
2.2: "ream Interpretation
!ollowing the judgment o# *ion"sus is the interpretation o# the dream. 1he
narrator recalls again that he had dragged a goat #rom a ra%ine V LV ^ I GVLLI ἶ ῆ
[ QU- line 8=- and calls it a gi#t #rom *ion"sus ] GU Q RUf_. 1he goat- asἐ ῖ ῶ ἐ
mentioned abo%e- has been interpreted as representing Herodas' poetr".42 1his same
goat is %iolentl" cut up Q X\ZI ]V̂ G[ U^- line = and consumed ]V\U_U^- lineἐ ἐ ῦ ἐ
=- b" the goatherds- who are described as per#orming rites ^ UF[V ̂ [[ U^[I- lineὰ ἔ ῦ
=. 1hough not per#ectl" clear due to a missing word in the manuscript- Herodas seems
to compare this beha%ior to how his mimes will be treated. He sa"s that man" among
the Muses will pluck ^[ U U fZU- line =, his works. 1hese lines ha%eῦ ἐ
generall" been interpreted in a negati%e wa"+ critics will Jtear apartO his poetr"- much
like the goatherds %iolentl" took and cut up his goat earlier in the dream. 4 would-
howe%er- like to propose another possible reading.
5, >ne possible metaphor 4 ha%e not seen discussed is the GVL- the ra%ine. 1his is mentioned twice+at line 8=- and earlier at line /8. 1he dragging o# the goat out o# the ra%ine ma" be re#erring to thein%ention o# a new poetic genre. 1he long ra%ine GVLLI N WVQG I- lines /8;/= ma" re#er to theῆlong tradition o# poetr" in general- or perhaps e%en iambs in particular.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 25/95
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 26/95
20
such a wa".
4 belie%e the man" re#erences to speci#ic poetic genres in the interpretation part
o# the dream also point to a clear connection to the acti%ities o# the Mouseion- whose
members were interested in categori@ing poetr". 1he word WTI line =/ is generall"
used to re#er to l"ric poetr"- a genre distinct #rom epic and traged".47 Herodas also uses
the term `[V line =8- which is most o#ten used o# epic poetr" but here o# his iambicἔ
poems.48 >ne #inds a direct re#erence to iambic poetr" in general at line == WXRU- andἰ
to per#ormance o# choliambic poetr" speci#icall" at line =6- when he mentions singing
sca@ons ^ Qf [\][U.ὰ ἀ 4 belie%e that the hea%" concentration o# these generic terms
in the #inal ten lines o# the poem suggests that Herodas is concerned with how his poetr"
will be classi#ied and recei%ed. Such a concern is natural #or the poet o# a new genre
writing at a time when there was great scholarl" interest in classi#ication o# poetr". He
recogni@es that his poems ma" be or perhaps more likel"- alread" ha%e been met with
skepticism or criticism since the" are so inno%ati%e- and accordingl" stri%es to place
himsel# in an alread" established tradition. 4n the #inal #our lines o# the poem he %er"
care#ull" engages in classi#ication himsel#. He mo%es #rom the broad categor" o# `[V toἔ
the more narrow genre o# iambos. ># course- as he is #ollowing a Hipponactean model-
he then must #urther de#ine his poems as choliambic poetr" Q_.
4 would like to argue that he takes this sel#;classi#ication one step #urther-
assuming one accepts a re#erence in line =6 to Callimachus' thirteenth iamb. Herodas
writes that he will sing his choliambs to the #uture descendants o# the sons o# outhos
5= )lato makes a clear distinction between epic- tragic- and l"ric poetr" in the !epublic. See 0=6a and8=a.
57 See anker ,6 and Cunningham /6=/ on line =8. Both cite a comic #ragment #ound in )age/65/- 0,5. 1he #ragment uses `[V in a broad sense similar to how Herodas uses it.ἔ
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 27/95
21
^ Qf [\][U _F\]ὰ ἀ ῃI [`_- line =6.56 Herodas makes a learned re#erence
here to the 4onians- who were the descendants o# outhos. 1his line ma" be responding
to the #inal lines o# Callimachus' thirteenth iamb+
^ [U FU ^ R _WW[\VI-ὔ Ἔ ἐ ὔ [U- F[U ̀ [G ^ WT^GV WTU^[IἜ ! " ὰ
^ R ^\Q^[U W WVF I UVfU^Vὰ ὰ ὴ ἀ ῶ ἐ)#ei##er !r. ,0- 85;88
Ha%ing come neither to Ephesus nor ha%ing mi2ed with the 4onians-to Ephesus- where those intending to produce choliambic %ersesare learnedl" inspired.
Callimachus mentions Ephesus and the 4onians because o# their close connection to
Hippona2. B" claiming that he ne%er tra%eled to Ephesus he is purpose#ull" distancing
himsel# #rom his literar" predecessor. 4n doing so he emphasi@es that- though inspired
b" the earlier iambographer- he has cra#ted his poetr" in a uniue manner- as an
inno%ator rather than imitator.50 1hus- when Herodas sa"s that he will sing to the
4onians- he is separating himsel# #rom Callimachus and aligning himsel# more closel"
with Hippona2. 1o borrow the biologist's classi#ication scheme- Callimachus and
Herodas are both in the same #amil" `[V- the genusἔ iambos- and the species
choliambos. 1he" then split- with Callimachus' poetr" #alling into one sub;species and
Herodas' into another. Much as Callimachus stri%es to distance himsel# #rom Hippona2-
Herodas distances himsel# #rom Callimachus to a%oid comparisons to a #amous
contemporar" #ellow poet. 1his e2plains the use o# terms marking poetic genres- which
would ha%e been well understood b" his educated audience.
3hile distancing himsel# #rom Callimachus- Herodas aligns himsel# more closel"
56 See Cunningham /6=/ and anker ,6 #or discussion o# the possible corruption o# [`_.9 Hughes /668- ,6.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 28/95
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 29/95
23
2.#: The $rogrammatic %ignificance of Mimiamb Eight
>ne additional wa" in which Herodas signals his debt to the iambic genre is
e%ident in the %er" structure o# the poem. 1he #irst se%en mimes are largel" dri%en b"
dialogue between two characters.53 4n all but the second mime dialogue between two or
more characters makes up the #ull content o# the mime. 4n #act- the eighth mime is the
onl" sur%i%ing mime in which there is just a single speaking part- since when the "oung
man and the old man speak it is reported b" the narrator.95 1he eighth mime is- then-
one long- mostl" uninterrupted narrati%e. Herodas ma" well ha%e chosen to cra#t his
poetic statement in such a #ashion to re#lect his awareness o# the iambic genre- in which
narrati%e pla"ed a crucial role.55 1his is just one more subtle wa" in which Herodas links
himsel# to the iambic tradition.
1he mime appears to end with a claim that he will win #ame #or his poetr" QTI-
line =8. $n#ortunatel"- the condition o# the pap"rus does not uite allow us to
understand precisel" how he la"s claim to this #uture #ame. Pe%ertheless- this boast#ul
claim contributes to his e##orts to %alidate his poetr" and de#end it #rom criticism. B"
asserting to his audience that he will win #uture #ame he is justi#"ing the creation o# a
new genre.
4# the order o# the mimes preser%ed in the manuscripts corresponds to the
original order in which Herodas composed and circulated the mimes- then it would
90 1he e2ception to this is the second mime- which consists entirel" o# Battaros' speech- uninterruptede2cept b" two lines. 4t ma" be that Herodas wrote more mimes like the second- but the limitede%idence that we ha%e suggests that the majorit" o# his mimes consisted primaril" o# dialogue betweenat least two characters.
95 1his ma" e%en be an e2ample o# Jmeta;mime-O especiall" i# one #a%ors solo recitation as theper#ormance mode o# the mimes.
99 See Bowie ,/.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 30/95
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 31/95
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 32/95
26
which is also concerned with establishing the model o# an ideal audience #or his poetr".
4mplicit in de#ining an ideal reader or %iewerlistener is an endorsement o# speci#ic
aesthetic %alues. As 4 ha%e alread" argued- concern with aesthetics should be e2pected o#
an author who so clearl" ad%ertises his connections to the iambic tradition.
2.&: Herodas as Hipponactean Aesthetic Critic in Mimiamb 'our
As Herodas' understanding and awareness o# his in#luences and generic topoi
ha%e now been demonstrated- 4 would like to turn to identi#"ing instances in the mimes
where he takes on the Hipponactean role o# aesthetic critic. 4n the remaining pages o#
this chapter it should become uite e%ident that not onl" does Herodas clearl" embrace
the role o# aesthetic critic- but that he is well suited to such a role. 4t is a natural
progression- 4 belie%e- to mo%e #rom the eighth mime to the #ourth. Both demonstrate a
strong interest in aesthetics in contemporar" poetr" and art. !urthermore- both help
guide the audience o# his poetr" in their interpretation o# his poems. 4n respect to this
#unction- both mimes are important programmatic pieces intended to in#luence the
reception o# his mimes. 1he #ourth mime will re%eal a strong knowledge o# Hellenistic
aesthetics in both poetr" and the plastic arts that carries o%er into the si2th and se%enth
mimes. A constant tension between the low;brow nature o# mimos and the ele%ated
statements o# aesthetic criticism borrowed #rom iambos will become e%ident- and will
ser%e to ob#uscate the poet's own %iew.
1he tension between high and low elements is most e%ident in the #ourth mime-
which deals directl" with criticism o# objects o# %isible arts. 1he mime #eatures two
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 33/95
27
women with speaking roles making an o##ering at a temple to Asclepius and %iewing and
critiuing the pieces o# art in and around the temple.8 1he tendenc" in past scholarship
has generall" been to dismiss the women as unsophisticated %iewers who #ail to
appreciate and properl" critiue the pieces o# art.8/ !ollowing such a %iew- Herodas' goal
is to make his audience laugh b" making sport o# uneducated- lower class indi%iduals. 4#
this is true- it is a clear e2ample o# Herodas pla"ing the role o# aesthetic critic. He takes
aim at the aesthetic %alues o# a particular class and holds them up #or mocker". 4mplicit
in this act is a rejection o# the %alues %oiced b" the women and- presumabl"- support #or
another set o# aesthetic %alues that he does not make apparent in the poem.8,
Such a reading o# the #ourth mime is- 4 belie%e- largel" correct- but does not #ull"
appreciate the comple2it" o# this particular mimiamb. 4 will propose that the #ourth
mime be interpreted as a sort o# metaphor #or the wa" in which Herodas' own mimes
were %iewed and an instructi%e piece demonstrating how not to %iew his poetr". ust as
8 1he temple is o#ten identi#ied as the Asclepion on the island o# &os- though the accurac" o# thisassertion is o# no great importance #or this paper. See Sherwin;3hite /6=7- 09;9, #or e%idence thatthe #ourth mime takes place in the Asclepion on &os. Cunningham /6=/ disagrees with thisassociation- belie%ing that none o# the works known to ha%e been in the temple at &os are mentionedin this mime. anker ,6- /5;/7 and /,,;/,6 rejects Cunningham's claim and o##ers support #orSherwin;3hite's %iew. He #ollows Sherwin;3hite in proposing that the #ourth mime ma"- in #act- ha%e
been composed to mark the reno%ations to the temple and increase in cult acti%ities. He sees a parallelto this in 1heocritus Idyll /9- which ma" ha%e been composed #or the Adonia.
8/ oldhill /665- ,,, sees the pronouncements o# the women as J#ar remo%ed #rom the Hellenisticsophos.O He echoes this sentiment in a more recent article ,=- stating that he belie%es the womenare mocked. *uBois ,=- 57 belie%es that the women are painted as Jridiculous and ignorant-O andthat the" primaril" act as a J#oilO #or knowledgeable %iewers. Skinner ,/ o##ers a di##erent %iew o#
the women in the #ourth mime. She sees the women as representati%e o# a uniue #emale %iewing st"lede%eloped in the poems o# Erinna- Possis- and An"te. 1he #ourth mime is an attempt b" Herodas toJdiscreditq the poetic e##ortsO o# these #emale authors p. ,,,.
8, Yacobi ,- =/8 belie%es that when a reader determines that a narrator in this case the two women- &"nno and &okkale is unreliable the" are at the same time deciding that the author disagrees with the narrator and supports an alternati%e %iewpoint. Herodas' e##orts to make the women anobject o# mocker" is %er" similar to what is done b" the speaker in in%ecti%e poems. B" attacking anindi%idual #or their %iews or actions the speaker is rejecting those %alues and promoting their own. SeePappa /666- who is interested in Catullus' in%ecti%e poems- but makes man" good points rele%ant toin%ecti%e poetr" in general.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 34/95
28
the interpretation o# the dream in the eighth mime is instructi%e- so too is the %iewing
e2perience o# the women in the #ourth mime. Herodas encourages his audience to reject
the women in the #ourth mime as ideal %iewers- and to learn the proper wa" o#
consuming his poetr"- using the two women as an anti;model. 4t will become apparent
b" the end o# this discussion that the #ourth mime demonstrates keen awareness o#
Hellenistic aesthetic %alues that were applicable to both literature and ph"sical pieces o#
art- and that Herodas e2pects his audience to recogni@e these %alues. Herodas
presupposes a parallel between %iewing %isual art and reading or listening to poetr".80
2.(: Contemporar) Criticism and Aesthetic *alues in Mimiamb 'our
raham anker sees the %er" structure o# the #ourth mime as e%idence #or
Herodas' close engagement and #amiliarit" with contemporar" Hellenistic art criticism
and popular aesthetic ualities. 4n his ,5 book #ocused on the act o# %iewing in
Hellenistic poetr" and %isual arts- he discusses the trend in both literature and the
plastic arts o# encouraging readers or %iewers to supplement details #or a gi%en scene.85
1he act o# supplementation draws a reader into the work and encourages deeper
re#lection on the work's meaning. Herodas demands his audience members supplement
%arious details throughout the #ourth mime as the women mo%e throughout the temple
comple2 o##ering brie# commentar" on %arious pieces o# art that capture their attention.
E%idence o# this techniue is seen in the demonstrati%es used b" the women when
80 Modern scholars ha%e noticed this parallel as well. See !owler /676 and anker ,5.85 See anker ,5- =,;/,. He o##ers numerous e2amples o# this trend in both the %isual arts and
literar" works.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 35/95
29
pointing to di##erent objects.89 1he women do not gi%e #ull descriptions o# the objects
%iewed- but short snippets that reuire the audience to #ill in the gaps using their own
knowledge.88 4n emplo"ing this supplementation techniue Herodas signals his own
#amiliarit" with contemporar" artistic techniues- skill#ull" incorporating a techniue
popular in the %isual arts into his own literar" art.
Be#ore #urther discussion it will be bene#icial to outline brie#l" the JplotO o# the
#ourth mime. As has been stated- mime #our #eatures two women at an Asclepion
making a thank o##ering to Asclepius #or curing a sickness. 1he names o# these two
women are debated- but 4 will settle on &"nno and &okkale.8= 1he mime opens with
&"nno greeting %arious gods associated with Asclepius- apologi@ing #or the meager
o##ering she has brought a rooster- and ordering her #riend &okkale to set down a
%oti%e tablet lines /;,. 1he pair then begins to inspect and comment on %arious pieces
o# art- including a statue #rom the sons o# )ra2iteles lines ,;,8- a girl looking at an
apple lines ,=;,6- a bo" strangling a goose lines 0;05- and #inall" a statue o# a
woman named Battale- with whom the women are #amiliar lines 09;07. 1heir
e2amination o# the art objects is then interrupted b" an e2tended scene o# %erbal sla%e
abuse prompted b" &"nno's #rustration at her sla%e &"dilla's #ailure to obe" her orders
89 anker ,8- 08=.88 anker ,6- /,5 recogni@es that the act o# supplementation would ha%e been #ar easier #or
Herodas' ancient audience than it is #or a modern reader o# his poems. 4# the Asclepion described inthe #ourth mime is- in #act- real- it is uite likel" that at least some o# Herodas' audience had at some
point seen the temple and the actual objects described in the poem- making the act o#supplementation e%en easier. !or those who had not- #amiliarit" with similar temples and pieces o# art
would ha%e enabled them to imagine a le%el o# detail not accessible to a modern audience.8= anker ,6 identi#ies these as the names o# the characters in the mime- #ollowing Headlam and
&no2 /6,,. See anker's note on page /5. Cunningham /6=/ belie%es &okkale to be the name o# asla%e accompan"ing &"nno based on the tone o# the order at lines /6;,. He belie%es that her #riend isnamed )hile- who is not introduced until line ,=. Cunningham's ,5 1eubner te2t #ollows the samepart distribution as his earlier commentar". 3hate%er names one adopts- it is clear #rom the te2t that&"nno has been to the temple pre%iousl" and is #amiliar with the artwork- while &okkale or )hile is
%isiting #or the #irst time.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 36/95
30
to #etch the temple attendant- and the entrance o# the women into the pronaos lines 06;
98. 1he women resume e2amining the art- with &okkale commenting on %arious #igures
in a painting 98;=/ and &"nno praising the talent o# Apelles lines =,;=7. 1he mime
concludes with the temple attendant entering and the women making their #inal
o##erings to the god lines =6;69.
3hile 4 wish to pa" the most attention to the language o# the assessments o##ered
b" the women o# %arious pieces o# art- it is use#ul to consider brie#l" the atmosphere
created b" the passages o# the poem that surround lines /;, and =6;69 and interrupt
lines 06;98 their contemplation o# the artwork. 4t is in these parts o# the poem that
Herodas helps guide the wa" in which his audience will %iew the two women and
emphasi@es their low;class status.87 1he o##ering o# a rooster TQ^GIἀ - line /,- the
meagerness o# which is emphasi@ed b" re#erring to it as merel" a second course
^ `\]G`Vἀ - line /0- is the #irst hint o# their status.86 &"nno's ele%ated language at this
part o# the poem is comicall" epic. 4n her e"es- this is no ordinar" rooster that she will
o##er to the god- but the herald o# the walls o# her home U^U Q\ZI ^\RU QvG_QV# ἰ
FfR- lines //;/,.= 4# Herodas intends this line to produce laughter- as 4 belie%e is the
case- it ma" be indicati%e o# the general attitude he e2pects his audience to adopt
towards &"nno and &okkale. ?ines ,/;07 #eature the women %iewing pieces o# art- but is
87 Yacobi ,- =/,##. argues that Junreliabilit"O is not a character trait o# a narrator the role o#
which &"nno and &okkale pla" in the #ourth mime- but that it is a Jh"pothesis that readers make.O1his h"pothesis is #le2ible and can be re#ormed at %arious points in the te2ts. Herodas' e##orts toemphasi@e the low;class status o# the women is intended to in#luence his elite audience to in#er thatthe women's statements lack reliabilit".
86 See anker ,6- Cunningham /6=/ and Headlam and &no2 /6,, on lines /, and /0. All pointout the connotation o# `\]G`V and comment on the humble nature o# this o##ering. anker notesἐthat a rooster was the onl" o##ering that could be a##orded b" the lower classes.
= &"nno has alread" earlier used the nouns ̂ [ I and Q\V at line = in a distinctl" epic conte2t when ῖ ἰmaking re#erence to )odaleirios and Machaon- two warriors who #ought at 1ro". 1he contrast betweenthese two passages is humorous. See Headlam and &no2 /6,,- ad. loc.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 37/95
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 38/95
32
o# Hellenistic societ" would assess pieces o# art. 3ithout this knowledge- attempts to
demonstrate that Herodas intends the women in mime #our to be e2amples o# bad
%iewers using onl" their spoken lines rel" on the risk" assumption that we meaning
present da" scholars #ull" understand Hellenistic aesthetics and the proper wa" o#
%iewing art. 4#- howe%er- it can be demonstrated that Herodas casts the women as
ignorant and unsophisticated outside o# the conte2t o# critiuing artwork- it is more
reasonable to e2pect that the" will show themsel%es to be euall" ignorant and
unsophisticated when it comes to %iewing and appreciating artwork. 4 ha%e #ollowed this
approach in hopes o# demonstrating that the audience is e2pected to %iew &"nno and
&okkale as lower class- uneducated women whose statements and actions would be
more at home on the comic stage than among a gathering o# educated critics. 1he
mi2ing o# characters o# low social status with as will soon be shown technical
terminolog" and appreciation o# contemporar" aesthetics creates ironic tension. 1hus it
is best to approach the comments the" make regarding the pieces o# art with a health"
air o# skepticism- and to assess care#ull" their pronouncements.
As the mime progresses- it becomes increasingl" clear that &"nno and &okkale
#ocus on aesthetic ualities o# the art objects that are known to ha%e been widel" %alued
in contemporar" Hellenistic reek societ". 1he" also emplo" a technical %ocabular" that
demonstrates knowledge o# art criticism- despite the #act that Herodas has characteri@ed
them as uneducated in other parts o# his poem. )lacing technical- seemingl" educated
statements in the mouths o# common- uneducated characters creates the tension that
has been discussed abo%e. !urthermore- it complicates how the audience is to interpret
the remarks. Be#ore del%ing #urther into this issue 4 would like #irst to e2amine se%eral
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 39/95
33
statements made b" the women to illustrate their use o# technical %ocabular" and to
elucidate which particular ualities the" #ind appealing in the works o# art.
2.(.1: +)nno and +okkale!s Technical *ocabular)
1he use o# technical %ocabular" is eas" to document. A#ter setting down the %oti%e
tablet- &okkale turns her attention to the statues o# the %arious gods that &"nno has just
pointed out. She re#ers to them speci#icall" as LVWV line ,/-ἄ a term reser%ed #or
statues o# di%ine #igures.=,
1he speci#icit" o# the term used #or the statues o# the gods is
emphasi@ed se%eral lines later- when &okkale turns to another statue o# a woman named
Batale- with whom she is e%identl" #amiliar. Here she uses the term U]GI line 08-ἀ
which is reser%ed #or human subjects.=0 A#ter their %iewing o# the objects is interrupted
b" the sla%e abuse scene- the" turn again to %iewing some sculptures and remark that
Athena hersel# seems to ha%e chiseled them ^V ^ G[ I FZUV\ZU LfKV ^ QVῦ ἐ ῖ % ὰ -
lines 9=;97. 1he %erb emplo"ed here- LfR- is another technical term used o#
sculptors.=5 More technical terms are used in their discussion o# the painting o# Apelles.
&"nno sa"s that his lines are true ZFUV\- \Z- L G V [\_ [ G[I I ̀ U ̂ἀ ὰ ἰ & ῖ ἐ
`[TR LGWWV^% - lines =,;=0. Both the adjecti%e ZFUI and the noun LGWWV ha%eἀ
speci#ic- technical meanings applicable to art.=9 4 will discuss ZFUI #urther below.ἀ 4t
=, See anker ,6- ad. loc and anker ,5- /5/;/50. Both Headlam and &no2 /6,, and
Cunningham /6=/- ad. loc. comment on the accusati%e #orm o# \FI that appears with the #emininearticle in the same line as the #orm o# LVWVἄ line ,/. 1his #orm ma" be o# some importance. 4n Atticreek the #eminine #orm o# \FI re#ers to worked or precious stones. Herodas o#ten slips Attic #ormsand constructions into his mimes- as might ha%e happened hereD see anker ,6- =;// andCunningham /6=/- ,//;/= #or help on Herodas' dialect. Headlam and &no2 /6,,- 22i2 write thatJthe cast and construction o# his sentences is #or the most part #luent Attic.O
=0 anker ,6- ad. loc.=5 anker ,6- ad. loc. Headlam and &no2 /6,, note that the term is limited to relie# sculpture-
whereas the %erb `R is used o# sculpture in the round. =9 !or discussion o# the adjecti%e ZFUI see el@er /679-ἀ and anker ,6- ad. loc. See )ollitt
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 40/95
34
is #airl" ob%ious #rom these e2amples that &"nno and &okkale possess and emplo" a
technical %ocabular" in their critiues o# the %arious pieces o# art. 3hether the audience
is to be induced to agree with their assessments b" the authoritati%e weight o# the
technical %ocabular" remains to be seen.
2.(.2: Mimiamb 'our!s Interest in *erisimilitude
># more interest than the use o# technical terms are the aesthetic ualities on
which the two women #ocus their attention. As will become clear in the %arious e2amples
#rom the te2t that 4 will soon discuss- &"nno and &okkale #ocus especiall" on the realistic
ualities o# the %arious pieces at which the" are looking. 1he" are drawn to pieces that
Jha%e the look o# li#e and da".O=8 An interest in and appreciation o# common subjects is
apparent in not onl" the literature o# Herodas' contemporaries- but also the plastic
arts.== :iewers had a particular interest in li#elike art. 4n literar" descriptions o# art
ekphraseis agalmaton readers and listeners had a great appreciation #or accounts that
were #illed with J%isual %i%idness-O #or which the" used the term enargeia UGL[V.ἐ =7
?iterar" accounts that possessed this ualit" o# %i%idness seemed almost to come ali%e to
/6=5 on technical usage o# LGWWV.=8 anker ,6 translates line 87 U XT`_ Q WTGZU `U^[Iὐ ὶ ὴ ἠ in this wa". So- too- do
Cunningham /6=/ and Headlam and &no2 /6,, interpret it- and take Iliad /7.8/ as its source.== 1heocritus' Idylls are an e2cellent e2ample. 1he" #eature #or the most part lowl" herdsman in scenes
set outside the cit". Some- such as Idyll /9- are set in the cit" and #eature scenes o# e%er"da" li#e and
common characters. See Burton /669 #or a treatment o# these so;called urban mimes. Sculptors-painters- and other artists who worked in ph"sical mediums mo%ed #rom the ideali@ed subject mattero# Classical reek art to more mundane scenes #eaturing a %ariet" o# e%er"da" subjects- such as#isherman- old women- and animals. See !owler /676 #or an e2cellent introductor" summar" o# thethemes popular in art both literar" and ph"sical in the Hellenistic period. anker ,5 o##ers asimilar stud"- though he is mostl" interested in how art was %iewed. >nians /6=6 also pro%ides ause#ul stud" in artistic pre#erences o# the Hellenistic audience.
=7 See anker ,5- 6. He #ollows an earlier stud" b" ra# /669- who in turn cites *io Chr"sostom/,.99;70. 3ebb /666 also notes the importance o# enargeia in ekphrasis. 3ebb ,6- 7=;/8has an entire chapter dedicated to the use o# enargeia in ancient ekphrases.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 41/95
35
the %iewer- and were mirrored b" realist depictions o# scenes and characters in the
plastic arts. Se%eral e2amples o# this appreciation #or li#elike ualities in art are e%ident
in the #ourth mime.
Be#ore looking at speci#ic e2amples o# how the women describe the works o# art in
the temple- 4 would like to discuss the speci#ic ekphrastic tradition on which Herodas
seems to be drawing. Man" o# the most popular ekphraseis #rom antiuit" are #ound in
epic poems- with Homer's ekphrasis o# the shield o# Achilles being one o# the best known
e2amples. 1he ekphraseis in Herodas- howe%er- seem to owe a debt to another popular
tradition- that o# ekphrastic epigram. Hellenistic ekphrastic epigram was an e2tremel"
popular genre- o# which thousands o# lines b" man" poets still sur%i%e.=6 >ne popular
theme o# Hellenistic epigram is to ri## on dedicator" epigrams #rom the Classical and
pre;Classical periods that were inscribed on objects dedicated in temples. 4n Hellenistic
epigrams- howe%er- the object to which the epigram re#ers need not be realD the poem
can e2ist merel" as a literar" te2t- without detracting #rom a reader's abilit" to
understand the content o# the epigram.7 Man" o# the ekphrastic passages in Herodas'
#ourth mime e2hibit this same ualit" the women re#er to objects in a temple with
which Herodas' audience ma" or ma" not ha%e been #amiliar. Another ke" di##erence
between Hellenistic epigram and its earlier #orebears is the #ocus on the lower classes
and mundane scenes o# li#e.7/ A #eature o# such epigrams is humor and in%ecti%e- which
=6 Bruss ,/- //7 estimates 5-= lines b" 8 or more poets #rom the %arland o# Meleager alone.)hilip o# 1hessalonica's %arland adds thousands o# additional lines #rom poets working in the period
between Meleager and )hilip's own time.7 Bruss ,/- /,/.7/ Bruss ,/- /0, remarks that earlier epigram #ocused on the li%es o# the elite classes and Jre#lectedq
the interests and ideolog" o# a part o# the population wealth" enough to commission poems and themonuments to inscribe them on.O An"te's collection o# epigrams to pets is an e2ample o# the moremundane subject matters o# interest to the Hellenistic audience.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 42/95
36
suggests a debt to the genres o# comed" and iambos.7, Herodas himsel# owes a debt to
these %er" same genres- and #eatures scenes depicting lower class characters and their
concerns. <ecogni@ing the parallels in the ekphrastic passages in the #ourth mime and
Hellenistic epigram allows us to draw on a %ast corpus that helps to understand how
Herodas intended his audience to react to &"nno and &okkale- and how a sophisticated
%iewer would respond to %isual objects o# art.
4 would like to look at just one particular e2ample #rom Herodas where a debt to
Hellenistic ekphrastic epigram is e%ident- although most o# the ekphrastic passages in
the #ourth mime e2hibit similar ualities. !ollowing their praise #or the statue b"
)ra2iteles' sons discussed abo%e- &"nno directs &okkale's attention to another piece o#
art- presumabl" a statue+70
GZ- \Z- ̂ U ̀ V ]V ̂ U UR Q[\UZU# ὴ ῖ ὴ ἄXT`_VU I ̂ W Ux Q G[ I V ^vUἐ ὸ ῆ ὐ ἐ ῖ ὐ U W X ^ W U Q ^V Kf[UD' ὴ ῃ ὸ ῆ ἐ
?ook- #riend- at the girl- that one looking upat the apple. 3ould "ou not sa" that she will soon #aint i# she does not grab the apple
?ines ,=;,6
Se%eral things are noteworth". !irst is the use o# a %erb o# speech G[ I #ollowed b" aἐ ῖ
statement that re#lects on the li#elike ualit" o# the piece o# art. 1his #ormula will be
repeated elsewhere in the #ourth mime. 1he use o# a second person %erb- particularl" an
imperati%e GZ-# here directed at &okkale- is paralleled in man" Hellenistic epigrams-
7, Bruss ,/- /,6 and /05 notes this debt.70 4t is possible that this was a #amiliar scene in ancient art. Headlam and &no2 /6,, ad. loc. cite two
%ases one b" Assteas and another b" Sotades that contain an image o# a girl in the arden o# theHesperides. Cunningham /6=/- ad. loc. belie%es Jthere is no reason to suppose a close connection
between these other imagesq and what is here described.O anker ,6- cites a %ariet" o# scholars in#a%or o# pushing such a connection- including ?ehman /659- 50;0 and 3ebster /685- /97;6 and50,.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 43/95
37
in which the %iewer- or perhaps more aptl"- the reader- is addressed b" the imagined
object. ># course- in literar" Hellenistic epigram ri##ing on dedicator" epigram the
narrati%e %oice is the object itsel#- while in the #ourth mime it is a character who e2ists
within the poem. Another similarit" to Hellenistic epigram is the interest in what might
happen were the inanimate object actuall" ali%e. 1he women in mime #our do this when
the" in%ent a narrati%e outside o# the scene depicted b" the statue- imagining the girl
#ainting. 1his is t"pical o# a Hellenistic %iewer- who was interested in ps"chological
portraiture- according to raham anker.75 Man" e2amples o# this are e%ident in the
thirt";si2 poems #rom the Antholog" #ocusing on M"ron's Hei#ers- which will be
discussed in more detail below.
1he women then mo%e #rom the girl looking at the apple to a bo" strangling a
goose ^ U ZUV`[QV I ̂ `V]\U ̀ U\L[ὴ ( ὸ - line 0/.79 &"nno's comments on this
statue are reminiscent o# her earlier statement regarding the girl and the apple. >nce
again she comments on how the statue is almost ali%e- remarking that one might be led
to belie%e it would speak were it not a stone `G ^ U `] U L U [ ^ W \FI-ὸ ῶ ῶ ῦ ἴ ὴ
^ GLU- G[ I- Vv[- lines 0,;00.ὔ ἐ ῖ ust as she imagines an e2tended narrati%e
#ainting #or the girl looking at the apple- so does she imagine that the statue o# the bo"
is on the cusp o# speaking. 1hough both are clearl" car%ed out o# inanimate material-
the" ha%e been worked in a realistic st"le such that the women can easil" imagine them
75 anker ,5- 88;=/. )ollitt /678- 96##. traces the de%elopment in the #ield o# portraiture o# theinterest in showing a subject's personalit" and ps"chological state.
79 1his particular piece has been associated with the :atican's JBo" with an Eg"ptian oose.O See anker,6 ad. loc. and p. /,8. Headlam and &no2 /6,, belie%e that this is the piece mentioned in )lin" &' 05.75 #rom the sculptor Boethus. Cunningham /6=/- ad. loc. rejects this %iew- citing the worko# Her@og- who #ound that Boethus' piece should be dated to the ,nd centur" BCE. See also <idgwa",8 #or anal"sis o# this statue- including brie# discussion o# the re#erence to the statue in Herodas'#ourth mime.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 44/95
38
coming to li#e. 1his is stated almost e2plicitl" in &"nno's ne2t line- when she states that
soon humans will put li#e into stones W - GU Q^ UFGR` Q I ̂ I \F_I _) ῳ * ἠ ὺ +
^ U U F[ UV-ὴ ὴ ῖ lines 00;05.
&okkale then shi#ts the con%ersation to the li#elike ualities o# another statue-
that o# Batale- daughter o# M"ttes. !rom these names it has been deduced that she was a
hetaira.78 )articular attention is drawn to how she is standing Q G I- y_UU - QRIὐ ὀ ῇ ῖ #
XTXZQ[U- lines 09;08. 4t is possible that she is in a pose consistent with a woman o# her
pro#ession.7= 3hate%er Batale's pro#ession and position- &okkale's #inal comments on
this statue are o# great interest. She emphasi@es the realistic depiction o# Batale b"
claiming that an"one who has seen this statue has no need o# seeing the real Batale
XTKVI I ̂ ^ ̂ [ QUWV W ^fWZI ][\FR. lines 0=;07. 1he statue is so li#elikeἐ ῦ ὸ ἰ ὴ ἐ
that it can stand as a replacement #or the real woman- e%en i# someone has not seen her
[ Wv ̂ I _^ἰ ἀ ὴ U [ ][ zV^ZU- line 0=. ἶ 1he adjecti%e ^ἔ _WI line 07 highlights the
Hellenistic appreciation o# realistic depictions o# indi%iduals and JthingsO in general. 4
will discuss this adjecti%e in more detail #urther below- but #or now it is enough to note
simpl" that the Hellenstic %iewer %alued art that was true to li#e- and it is on this trait
that &"nno and &okkale sei@e.
1he objects on which the women ha%e commented at this point in the mime are
onl" loosel" connected to the religious conte2t o# the Asclepion and the reasons #or the
78 Cunningham /6=/ ad. loc. sa"s o# the #ull name that it one Jno respectable woman would bear.OBatale is related to the %erb XV^^VG\R to stammer. , anker ,6 ad. loc. help#ull" adds thatstammering was considered e##eminate. >n the name JM"ttesO he notes that it is connected to thenoun Wf^I- which Jdenoted a man with an unbridled se2ual appetite.O
7= Headlam and &no2 /6,, belie%e her pose to be re#lecti%e o# her character. >ne sees here an e2ampleo# the Hellenistic audience and artist's interest in capturing the personalit" o# a subject. See noteabo%e.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 45/95
39
women's own %isit b" the #act that the" are in the sanctuar". Besides the LWV^Vἀ
treated in the #irst ,8 lines- the ne2t three pieces the girl looking at the apple- the bo"
strangling the goose- and the %oti%e statue o# Batale are JsecularO objects as much as
this term can be applied to an" object in a temple. 4 will return to this point later- but
#or now it is enough to note that the women do not o##er an" commentar" on the
possible religious conte2t o# these pieces. Such commentar" is particularl" conspicuous
in their discussion o# the statue o# Batale. 1his statue was surel" dedicated as a thank
o##ering to Asclepius- presumabl" #or curing her o# some unspeci#ied illness.77 1he girl
looking at the apple ma" also ha%e had a religious connection to the temple that the
women #ail to notice. 4t is has been proposed that the statue o# the Jirl under the Apple
1reeO in Pew York $ni%ersit"'s 4nstitute o# !ine Arts is a cop" o# the statue mentioned in
Herodas. 4n this cop" there is a snake wrapped around a tree. 1he snake is the s"mbol o#
the doctor's guild- which was closel" connected to Asclepius.76 1he religious conte2t o#
the ne2t piece is likewise ignored.
Another e2ample o# the women #ocusing on li#elike ualities and ignoring
possible religious conte2ts #or the artwork is seen a#ter their %iewing is interrupted b"
the abuse o# the sla%e &"dilla. &okkale is trans#i2ed b" a painting o# a naked bo"
participating in a sacri#icial procession. She imagines the wound he would ha%e i# she
were to scratch him ^ U `V ]V ] ^ U L_WU U U QU\R ^ ^U Q QI [- lines 96;ὸ ῖ ὴ ὸ ὸ ' ῦ ὐ ἔ ἔ
8. Again- she is #ascinated b" imagining the subject o# the painting e2isting outside o#
the static scene in which he is depicted. 1he li#elike ualit" o# his #lushed skin V GQ[Iἰ
77 See anker ,6- ad. loc.76 Cunningham /6=/- ad. loc. sternl" warns that this interpretation ought not be attempted. anker
,6- ad. loc. o##ers a brie# but con%incing case #or wh" such an interpretation is possible- drawingon the research o# Massa )ositano /6=0 and *i regorio /66=.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 46/95
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 47/95
41
her ^R ` - y_UU\- ̂ ^TG QfG - line =/.ὔ ἐ ῖ ῇ ἐ ῃ ῃ >ne ma" here imagine the Mona
?isa or an" similar painting- whose e"es notoriousl" seem to #ollow the %iewer.
&okkale notices and reacts to this phenomenon.6, 4t is %er" di##icult to read these lines
without thinking o# the series o# epigrams taking M"ron's Hei#er as their subject. 1his
connection again suggests that Herodas' ekphrastic passages are best interpreted in a
manner similar to Hellenistic epigrams posing as inscriptions. !ollowing line =/- &"nno
speaks brie#l" on the prowess o# Apelles. 1he temple attendant will then enter and the
women will o##er no #urther comments on the artwork in the temple.
2.,: +)nno and +okkale as Anti-odels for how to ead Herodas
!rom the e2amples cited abo%e it should be clear that the two %iewers #eatured in
the #ourth mime are drawn to pieces o# art done in a realistic st"le that depict subjects in
such a wa" that suggests to the %iewer that the piece is on the brink o# coming to li#e or
that encourages the %iewer to imagine the subject reacting to a touch or some other
outside stimulus. 4t should be no surprise that the women are drawn to such pieces.
Scholars working on Hellenistic art and aesthetics ha%e noticed this interest in li#elike
depictions in the companion #ields o# poetr" and ph"sical art.60 Mundane subject
matters and scenes become increasingl" popular in the Hellenistic period and there is a
decrease in the ideali@ed images o# the Classical period.65 1hus- Herodas' #ourth mime
6, See &oenderink- et. al. ,5 #or a scienti#ic stud" o# this phenomenon. anker ,6- ad. loc. belie%es that this e##ect- commonplace toda"- ma" ha%e been a no%elt" #or Herodas' audience.
60 !owler /676- 5 notes that common subjects in Hellenistic art and poetr" included %arious memberso# the lower classes and scenes o# e%er"da" li#e. <unning parallel to this interest in new subjects wasJan increasing realismO made possible b" ad%ancement in techniues and technical abilities.
65 )ollitt /678- /5 remarks that realism JsupersedesO the idealistic depictions o# the pre%ious age.4nwood and erson /66=- 2% see a similar shi#t in philosoph". )latonic idealism gi%es wa" toJempiricism- materialism- and naturalism.O
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 48/95
42
#eatures %iewers e2amining pieces o# art that were e%identl" in st"le at the time o#
composition. 4t will be important to keep in mind as we consider how Herodas intended
his audience to %iew &"nno and &okkale that the" both appreciate aesthetic ualities
that were %alued b" contemporar" Hellenistic societ". *espite this- 4 will argue that
Herodas does not cast the two women as respectable critics worth" o# emulation- but
that he instead holds them up as models #or how not to %iew art in general and his own
poetr" in particular.
Be#ore del%ing into this claim- 4 would like to look at other e2amples #rom
Hellenistic poetr" in which emphasis is placed on the %erisimilar ualities o# art objects.
4 would like to start #irst with part o# an epigram b" Possis+
^ U ̀ \UVQV VUF I yV ]WU [ I G]\^VIὸ ) - ἰ % [ QUV LGVKVWTUV `U^ UTFZQ[U VU.ἰ ἀ ἴ
&allo dedicated this %oti%e tablet in the temple o# blond Aphrodite- painted with an image wholl" alike the real &allo hersel#.
)alat. Ant. 6.89
1he image on the `\UV is recogni@ed b" the narrati%e %oice o# the %iewer as a stand;in
#or the real &allo hersel#. &okkale e2presses a similar sentiment when %iewing the statue
o# Batale in Herodas' #ourth mime lines 0=;07D see page 07 abo%e. 1he importance o# a
truth#ul or realistic representation is e%ident in another o# Possis' epigrams- in which
the %iewer is looking at the portrait o# a child and is struck b" how closel" the child
resembles her mother I ^fWRI F_L^ZG ̂ WV^TG ̀ U^V ̀ ^ Q[D )alat. Ant. 8. 090-. ἐ / 0
line 0. 1he ad%erb #ormed #rom ^_WIἔ should remind us o# line 07 in Herodas- and
perhaps also o# U^RI in line 89- which is used b" Herodas to essentiall" mean the same#
thing as ^_WIἔ . Emphasis is placed on the importance o# truth to an original in art
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 49/95
43
objects in other epigrams o# Possis as well.69
1he series o# thirt";si2 epigrams in the reek Antholog" that take M"ron's Hei#er
as their subject are likewise interested in the cra#tsman's skill in creating a statue that
appears ali%e to the %iewer- and o##er perhaps the closest parallel to the ekphrastic
passages in Herodas' #ourth mime. 4n almost all o# these epigrams some witt" comment
is made that pla"s with the idea that the %iewer is looking not at a statue- but a real cow.
)oem 6.=/5 )alat. Ant. is representati%e o# the collection+
z\]U [ W fGRUI- ` ^vZI ] UQ[WV.ἰ ἐ ὶ ἀ X_Q[- Q[U^vVI [ I LTZU W `VL[.ἰ ἀ ἄ
4 am M"ron's hei#er- and 4 am set up atop a base. > cowherd- ha%ing goaded me- lead me to the herd.
Here- o# course- the piece is acknowledged to be a statue- "et the JpunchlineO o# the
epigram is that this statue is so li#elike that the %iewer ought to treat it as a real cow.
1his same #eature is #ound in 6.=/5- in which the %iewer is asked i# heshe wishes to lead
the cow home Q FT[I [ VLTW[U WTLVGU-ὐ ἐ ἰ line ,. ?ikewise- another epigram states
that the cow is so realistic that it is #air to sa" that M"ron did not mold the sculpture
with his hands- but that he ga%e birth to it fGRUI [ G `[U- ^[Q[U- ὶ ὐ ἀ ἔ
6.=,8- line ,. 4n another a bull is tricked into pursuing the cow- beguiled b" M"ron's
decepti%e cra#t V G[- W^ZU ` WU `[\L[Vx ^ L G `U_Ix ῦ ἐ ὶ ἐ ἔ ὰ ἄ ἀ ὁ
X_`^VI V`^Z[ fGRU- 6.=05.ἐ >ne could cite numerous other e2amples where
attention is called to the li#elike ualit" o# the statue in the #orm o# a statement
imagining the cow is real. So- too- do the women in Herodas' #ourth mime #ind
themsel%es capti%ated b" the girl who seems about to #aint- the statue o# Batale that
69 See )alat. Ant. 8.095 and 6.85 #or e2amples.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 50/95
44
could be a replacement #or the real woman- the bo" whose #lushed skin would bleed
should he be scratched- the sil%er #ire;tongs that would e2cite an" thie# who happened to
set e"es on them- or the sacri#icial o2 whose #rightening glare stirs up terror in &okkale's
heart. 1he women in the #ourth mime are clearl" interested in the same #eatures that
e2cited other Hellenistic %iewers.
And "et- 4 belie%e that Herodas does not want his audience to accept &"nno and
&okkale as authoritati%e #igures #or how to %iew art. 1o support this claim- it is
necessar" to consider what makes a good %iewer- and #or this it will be use#ul to consider
ekphrasis as a poetic de%ice and its role in ancient poetr". 1he basic de#inition o# an
ekphrasis can be disputed- with some scholars arguing #or an e2pansi%e de#inition while
others pre#er a more limited application o# the term. !or the purposes o# this paper 4 will
work with a somewhat more narrow de#inition+ Jthe representation in words o# a %isual
representation.O68 1his de#inition is closer to the speci#ic sub;categor" o# ekphrasis
called ekphrasis agalmaton- which is the description o# works o# art b" a literar" %iewer.
4t is this #orm o# ekphrasis that we see in the #ourth mime. Central to ancient ekphrasis
is enargeia, or %isual %i%idness- which has been discussed abo%e.6= 1he goal o# enargeia
in orator"- according to ancient authorities such as {uintilian and ?onginus- is to
stimulate an emotional reaction #rom the audience- such that the" are persuaded b" the
orator.67 1he descriptions o# scenes- characters- and objects must be brought to li#e b"
68 Bartsch and Elsner ,=- i. *u Bois ,=- 59 notes that this is a Jreducti%e de#inition-O but adoptsit hersel#. anker ,5- = gi%es as a de#inition+ the Jocular presentation in literature o# an"phenomenon in nature and culture.O 3ebb ,6- in her introduction pp. /;//- gi%es a goodo%er%iew o# the broad de#inition o# ekphrasis that was used in the ancient world.
6= See oldhill ,=- 0;=D *uBois ,=- 59D anker ,5- ,9.67 oldhill ,=- 0;7 discusses %arious Jrhetorical handbooks-O including those o# {uintilian and
?onginus.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 51/95
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 52/95
46
but statements that are re#lecti%e o# the %iews o# an elite- intellectual class./5 1his is
taken #or granted when dealing with ekphraseis in epigrams or other genres- such as
histor" or rhetoric- where the description o# an object and commentar" on it are issued
#rom an authoritati%e #igure- such as the narrati%e %oice in an epigram or historical
report. 1his authoritati%e %oice behind an ekphrasis is usuall" a member o# the elite
class whose opinions can generall" be interpreted as re#lecti%e o# the widespread %iews
o# a sophisticated upper class./9 Ha%ing pre%iousl" stated that an ekphrasis is
instructi%e- it can now be added that the" speci#icall" instruct the audience member in
elite- intellectual belie#s and %alues.
>ne #inal point on what constitutes a good or bad %iewer will pro%e particularl"
illuminating in the discussion concerning how Herodas characteri@es his women and
how he wants his audience to react to their responses to the art in the temple. ?onginus-
in his rhetorical work |[G K_I ὶ 1 $n the Sublime- discusses the power#ul e##ect
enargeia can ha%e on an audience. He writes that an orator is not onl" able to persuade
an audience member- but can ensla%e him `[\F[ ̂ U QGV^ U WUU- QVὐ ὸ ἀ ὴ ἀ ὰ ὶ
]_ ^V- /9.6.ῦ oldhill sei@es on the importance o# this passage- and argues that Ja
good listener knows to resist- to be critical.O/8 4# a similar line o# reasoning can be
He argues that the production o# commentar" happens in the epigrams related to M"ron's Hei#er- belie%ing that the epigrams do not respond to the sculptor's work- but to the Jtropes o# %erisimilitudeO
/=. 1he epigrams do not merel" note the li#elike nature o# the statue- but engage in an intellectualdiscussion that has its basis in an awareness o# art criticism and the widel" held aesthetic %alue o# arealist portra"al o# nature. 4t this engagement with an intellectual tradition that is missing in theremarks o# the women in Herodas' #ourth mime.
/5*uBois ,=- 58./9Although it ma" be ob%ious- 4 am re#erring here to ancient ekphraseis. E%en in the ancient world there
ma" be e2ceptions to this general statement. 1he ekphrastic epigrams o# Possis and Erinna come tomind. 4t is possible- though- that these still represent the elite- male;dominated %iewpoint.
/8oldhill ,=- 5. 3ebb ,6- /0/;/88 e2plores how enargeia was used in rhetoric as a persuasi%etool.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 53/95
47
applied to the e##ect o# enargeia in art and ekphrastic descriptions it ma" help to
understand the reactions o# the women in mime #our./= 1he" are mo%ed b" the %i%idness
o# the artwork in the temple to emotional responses- much like the orator can stimulate
the emotions o# an audience. 1his emotional response pre%ents critical detachment and
anal"sis. A sophisticated %iewer is able to resist the allure o# enargeia and remain at a
distance- which allows proper re#lection.
4t will be instructi%e to return again to the epigrams dealing with M"ron's Hei#er.
4 ha%e pre%iousl" stated that both the narrati%e %oices o# these epigrams and the women
in the #ourth mime #ocus on the li#elike ualit" o# the art objects that the" take as their
subjects. 1his is true- but the responses to the realistic ualities are uite di##erent.
Herodas' women point out the %erisimilar nature o# the art objects and imagine the
responses or actions o# the pieces o# art were the" trul" ali%e the girl would #aint- the
bo" would bleed- and so #orth. Most o# the authors o# the thirt";si2 epigrams- howe%er-
react in a di##erent wa". Simon oldhill has brie#l" e2amined these epigrams in the
conte2t o# a longer article on the purpose o# ekphrasis- and argued that the epigrams are
not primaril" concerned with description o# the statue- but a response to the Jtropes o#
%erisimilitude.O/7 1he poets e2hibit an intellectual interest in the duplicit" o# the
statue./6 1he onl" response o##ered b" the women in Herodas- howe%er- is ama@ement.
1o show the great di##erence between the responses o# the poets o# the epigrams
and the women in the #ourth mime- let us again consider again one o# the ekphrastic
epigrams mentioned abo%e+
/= 4 belie%e that this reasoning can be applied to ekphrastic passages. See oldhill ,=- 8 #or supporto# this %iew.
/7oldhill ,=- /=. See pp. /9;/6 #or his anal"sis o# these epigrams./6Suire ,/- 96, makes this same point.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 54/95
48
V G[- W^ZU ` WU `[\L[Vx ̂ L G `U_Ixῦ ἐ ὶ ἐ ἔ ὰ ἄ
X_`^VI V`^Z[ fGRU.ἀ ὁ ἐBull- in %ain do "ou long #or the hei#er- #or it is li#eless. But M"ron the cow;sculptor has decei%ed "ou.
)alat. Ant. 6.=05
1his poem is certainl" dependent on the premise that the statue is li#elike- but the
narrator does not stop a#ter noting the realistic nature o# the statue- but instead
proceeds to a more sophisticated response. oldhill identi#ies this as a #eature common
to all the poems in this collection.// 1he sophistication o# this epigram is elouentl"
stated b" Suire- who identi#ies the Janus;#aced concern with not onl" the promise o#
the sculpture to come to li#e but also its #ailure to do soO as the Jmost strikingO #eature o#
this series o# epigrams./// 4n the %er" #irst line the narrator pla"s with the idea o# the
realistic nature o# the statue the lust" bull is decei%ed- but uickl" undercuts this b"
emphasi@ing that it is- a#ter all- just a statue it is breathless or li#eless `U_Iἄ . 1he
second line pla"s emphasi@es the skill o# the cra#tsman- M"ron- and implicitl" the
decepti%e nature o# art.
1he sophistication o# this short poem is more ob%ious when considering
&okkale's response to the o2 in the painting. She imagines the o2 as i# it were ali%e- just
like the pre%iousl" discussed epigram- but #ails to undermine this b" noting that the
image is- in #act- li#eless. E%en more important- howe%er- is her #ailure to o##er an"
commentar" on the duplicitous nature o# the piece or the role o# the artist. 1he #ollowing
lines spoken b" &"nno emphasi@e this. She #ocuses on the truth o# Apelles' depiction
// oldhill ,=- /= notes that #ollowing some indication o# the li#elike ualit" comes Ja more pointed-cle%erer retort.O
/// Suire ,/- 8/.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 55/95
49
ZFUV\-ἀ line =,- which should be contrasted directl" with the decepti%e nature o#
M"ron X_`^VI V`^Z[ fGRUὁ ἐ noted in the abo%e poem. 1he
sophisticated response o# the authors o# the epigrams pla" with the tropes o#
%erisimilitude-//, while Herodas' women merel" notice the %erisimilar ualities o# the art
objects. 1his contrast helps to make clear the #ailure o# the women to be mo%ed to
intellectual commentar" and contemplation- both o# which are the marks o# a good
%iewer.
4t is necessar" to recogni@e that interpreti%e di##iculties are introduced when
ekphrastic descriptions and related commentar" are issued #rom a source other than the
narrati%e %oice- as happens in mime #our. 1he art objects are not described #rom the
poet's point o# %iew- but #rom that o# two characters within the poem. Statements issued
#rom an authoritati%e third;person narrator are generall" more objecti%e and
authoritati%e. At the %er" least- a third;person narrati%e %oice clearl" marks that the
e%aluati%e statements issued b" a character within the poem re#lect onl" the opinion o#
that character. 4n Book / o# the Aeneid - #or e2ample- it is per#ectl" clear that the
interpretation o##ered o# the images in Hera's temple in Carthage belongs to Aeneas
himsel#D it is ob%ious that he is a %iewer and his reactions are the result o# his emotional
e2periences. 4n the #ourth mime- howe%er- the subjecti%it" o# the %iewers &"nno and
&okkale is not signaled b" a distant narrati%e %oice. 1he audience o# the poem must
recogni@e the #allibilit" o# the two women through whose ga@e the images are #iltered.
>nce this #act is recogni@ed- Herodas' audience must care#ull" consider the source o# an"
//, See again oldhill ,=- /8. He notes that the authors o# the epigrams Jall respond to the tropes o# %erisimilitude.O
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 56/95
50
e%aluati%e or critical statements and use their knowledge o# the source to judge these
statements.
4n the case o# &"nno and &okkale- the audience must bear in mind that the
women are not representati%e o# the intellectual elite- but the %er" opposite. As
discussed pre%iousl"- both women appear to occup" ranks within the lower- uneducated
parts o# societ". Both women show #amiliarit" with Hellenistic aesthetics and technical
terminolog" that at #irst glance suggests the" are part o# the same intellectual discourse
in which the narrati%e %oices o# %arious epigrams participate. Yet- their statements are
undercut b" two things. !irst- the" are %er" clearl" not part o# the intellectual elite-
which immediatel" casts suspicion on their aesthetic pronouncements. Second- and
more importantl"- despite an understanding o# the proper words- the women #ail to go
be"ond the phase o# %iewing and emotional reaction to the interpretati%e phase that
includes commentar" and deeper re#lection. 1his is best e2empli#ied b" two #ailures o#
the women to respond in a sophisticated manner. !irst- the women #ail to o##er an"
commentar" on the religious conte2t o# the objects %iewedD this #ailure is emphasi@ed b"
the appearance o# the temple attendant directl" #ollowing their discussion o# Apelles'
sacri#ice scene and &"nno's spirited de#ense o# the painter. 4t seems appropriate that
objects in a temple should produce some commentar" related to the conte2t o# the
artwork- but &"nno and &okkale do not appear to make the ob%ious connection between
the dedication o# art objects in a temple and the religious signi#icance o# such an act. 1he
second #ailure is their general inabilit" to o##er an" commentar" be"ond that centered on
the li#elike ualities o# the %arious art objects the" %iew. 1he" are ensla%ed b" the
%i%idness- the enargeia- to such a degree that the" cannot o##er detached commentar" or
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 57/95
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 58/95
52
&okkale and &"nno then come to represent recei%ers o# his poetr" who #ail to reach the
contemplati%e stage o# %iewing or in this case- reading or listening e2pected o# an
artist's audience that results in commentar".
4# this is accepted it becomes e%ident that Herodas intends his audience to
anal"@e his mimes and not merel" note the sur#ace ualities o# realism that are at #irst
e%ident. At se%eral places in the te2t Herodas seems to warn %iewers o# committing such
a mistake. 1hese warnings are placed in the mouths o# the two women- who comicall"
#ail to reali@e that the" are doing e2actl" what the" warn others against doing. !or
e2ample- when discussing the reaction o# the potential thie%es to the sil%er #ire;tongs
#irst mentioned at line 8,- &okkale mockingl" imagines their e"es popping out in
e2citement QXV[ ̂ I QfGVI- line 85ἐ ῦ ὰ as the" are decei%ed b" the painting. 1his is
almost e2actl" what &okkale does se%eral lines later- when she remarks that she is
almost mo%ed to screaming UZV- line =ἀ b" the li#elike appearance o# the bull
glaring at her. ?ikewise- &"nno berates her sla%e &"dilla #or standing awestruck in the
temple- gaping around ^ ][ῇ 2 ][2 VQ[fῃ- line 5,. &"dilla's ga@e is compared to
that o# a crab G[ V QVGQ\U_ WTU- line 55. 1his scene isὀ ῦ especiall" comic- because
&"nno #inds #ault with &okkale #or staring in awe at the %arious objects o# art that &"nno
and &okkale themsel%es ha%e both just #ocused on in an e2cited manner. 4t is also
another instructi%e e2ample o# an improper act o# %iewing. ust as the two women mock
those who the" imagine to ha%e been decei%ed b" the %erisimilitude o# the art- so does
Herodas ridicule the audience members o# his poems- represented b" the characters in
his #ourth mime- who #ocus onl" on the realistic ualities o# his own poetr".
Another e2ample o# Herodas guiding his audience appears in &"nno's lines
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 59/95
53
#ollowing &okkale's reaction to the bull. <esponding to her #riend's appreciation o# the
painting's li#elike %i%idness- she praises its painter- Apelles. Herodas' decision to include
the name o# this #amous painter is no small coincidence- whate%er his association with
the Asclepion at &os.//= Besides the #ineness o# his lines to which &"nno clearl" alludes-
Apelles was also known #or paintings so decepti%el" true to li#e that one could predict
through ph"siognom" when the subject o# his portraits would die. //7 Apelles should be
%iewed as a parallel to Herodas himsel#. Both are skilled in li#elike depictions- and both
decei%e their audience. Apelles does so through the illusion that his paintings are ali%e.
Herodas does so through the realistic ualities o# the characters and mundane settings
o# his mimes that lull his audience into the belie# that the mimes onl" operate on an
ob%ious le%el and nothing o# importance is hidden beneath the sur#ace. 1he" #ail to
probe deeper and notice the less ob%ious elements o# his poetr"- such as aesthetic
statements.//6 &"nno then prescribes a punishment #or those #ound guilt" o# not %iewing
properl" the works o# Apelles. She declares that whoe%er has %iewed Apelles works
without gi%ing them just consideration W `VWVvVI Q ]\QZI- line == ought to beὴ ἐ
hung up in a #uller's shop `] I QGTWV^ Q[ UI U LUVTRI Q -ὸ ἐ ῖ ἐ ἴ ῳ line =7./, 1his
statement is both comical and serious. 4t is sure to pro%oke laughter #rom an educated
audience that recogni@es the #ailure o# &"nno and &okkale to %iew properl" the artwork
in the temple. At the same time- it is also a warning #or those who #ail to gi%e Herodas'
//= See #ootnote 8.//7 )lin" &atural 'istory 09.08+ Imagines adeo similitudinis indiscretae pin(it, ut ) incredibile dictu )
Apio grammaticus scriptum reli*uerit, *uendam e( +acie hominum divinantem, *uos metoposcoposvocant, e( iis di(isse aut +uturae mortis annos aut praeteritae vitae.
//6 1his certainl" has been the case in much o# the earl" scholarship on Herodas a#ter the originalpublication o# the pap"rus- and persists in some scholarship o# the current period.
/,1his ma" be an echo o# Hippona2. See *egani !r. /=5.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 60/95
54
poetr" #air consideration and recogni@e that beneath the thick la"ers o# paint depicting
mundane scenes and li#elike characters e2ists serious commentar" on Hellenistic
aesthetics and ethics.
Maril"n Skinner has taken another %iew o# the #ourth mime. <ather than %iewing
it as a programmatic paradigm #or how Herodas wants his own poetr" to be %iewed- she
belie%es that Herodas composed the #ourth mime primaril" as a reaction against the
in#luence o# %arious #emale poets Erinna- Possis- and An"te- #or e2ample on his
#ellow male Hellenistic poets. 4n Skinner's %iew- %arious aspects o# the #ourth mime-
such the setting in an Asclepion- an e2perienced JguideO leading a Jprot}g}e-O and
language reminiscent o# dedicator" epigrams- all encourage the audience to recogni@e a
connection to the uniue #emale %iewing perspecti%e de%eloped primaril" in ekphrastic
epigrams./,/ 1his J#emini@ed perspecti%eO was- in Skinner's %iew- gaining acceptance
among male poets. She identi#ies 1heocritus' #i#teenth Idyll - which #eatures two women
at the Adonia- as #riendl" to this #emale perspecti%e. 4n her %iew- 1heocritus Ja##irms the
#eminine ekphrastic tradition.O/,, 1hough it is impossible to establish whether Herodas'
or 1heocritus' poem came #irst- it is the general trend embodied b" 1heocritus' poem
that Skinner #inds important. She belie%es that Herodas' mime satiri@es the #emale
perspecti%e embraced b" 1heocritus in a misog"nist attempt to pre%ent the spread o#
#emale poets' in#luence that had begun with Erinna.
Simon oldhill responds to Skinner's claim and rejects the e2istence o# a uniue
J#emale %iewing subject.O/,0 oldhill's primar" criticism is that the ekphrastic epigrams
/,/ Skinner ,/- ,,/./,, Skinner ,/- ,/8. Burton /669- /=;/7 also sees 1heocritus as #riendl" to #emale %iewpoint./,0 oldhill ,=- /.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 61/95
55
cited b" Skinner e2hibit no ob%ious signs o# a uniuel" #eminine %oice. 4n his %iew- the
uniue #emale elements identi#ied b" Skinner can also be #ound in ekphrastic epigrams
produced b" males./,5 He proceeds to dismiss %arious e2amples put #orth b" Skinner on
the same grounds- that the e2amples o# a uniue J#emale aestheticO gi%en b" Skinner are
in #act #ound in e2amples o# ekphrasis that can be traced as #ar back as Homer./,9
oldhill argues that the #emale writers o# ekphrastic epigram ha%e been primaril"
in#luenced b" epitaphs written b" men- and that these are the e2amples the" imitate./,8
His #inal comment on the matter is that the women o# both Herodas' #ourth mime and
1heocritus' #i#teenth Idyll are ironicall" mocked- and as a result a Jsociall" normati%e
e##ectO is #elt./,= 4 am persuaded b" oldhill's rebuttal o# Skinner's argument regarding
the #ourth mime- but do still #ind %alue in Skinner's argument. E%en i# the #ourth mime
is not necessaril" responding to a uniue #emale %iewing perspecti%e- the comple2it" o#
the #ourth mime clearl" demands greater attention than it has recei%ed in the past. 4 will
shortl" come to a discussion o# the possible in#luence that 4 belie%e Posiss and Erinna
did ha%e on Herodas' work- which- while not related to the J#emale %iewing subject-O
does indicate that Herodas was aware o# #emale poets and that their inno%ations in
another poetic genre had a pro#ound e##ect on his mimes.
4n summar"- 4 belie%e the primar" goal o# the #ourth mime is to de#ine an ideal
%iewer not just o# %isual art- but also o# Herodas' poetr". 4# m" reading is adopted the
#ourth mime should stand as another e2ample o# Herodas pla"ing the role o# aesthetic
/,5oldhill ,=- // argues that Je%er" aspect o# this poem's )alat. Anth. 8.09,D an ekphrastic epigramo# Erinna cited b" Skinnerq language- structure- and argument is easil" paralleled in ekphrastic writingproduced b" men.O
/,9 oldhill ,=- /,./,8oldhill ,=- /5./,= oldhill ,=- /9.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 62/95
56
critic- which is e2pected o# him as a literar" descendant o# Hippona2. 1he #ourth mime is
a programmatic piece- much like the eighth mime- in which Herodas guides the
reception o# his poetr". He does so b" pro%iding an e2ample o# ignorant %iewers
commenting on pieces o# art that #eature ualities parallel to those #ound in his own
mimes- namel" li#elike scenes and characters. He signals to the astute audience member
that his poems demand deep contemplation and should lead to intellectual commentar"-
just as would be e2pected #rom a sophisticated %iewer o# art. 1he #ourth mime is an
e2cellent e2ample o# Herodas' strong connection to the genre o# iambos- o# which
aesthetic criticism was a prominent #eature. 4n his %eiled attempt to guide his %iewers to
reject the statements o# &"nno and &okkale- Herodas adopts the %oice o# the aesthetic
critic borrowed #rom his literar" ancestor- Hippona2.
2./: Aesthetic Criticism in Mimiamb %i0
3hile the #ourth and eighth mimes are the most ob%ious e2amples o# Herodas
commenting on the workings o# his poetr" and pla"ing the role o# aesthetic critic- other
e2amples can be cited where he makes clear allusions to the poet's cra#t. 1he si2th
mime- in particular- demonstrates awareness o# the genre within which he works and
pro%ides an e2cellent illustration o# the need #or the deeper reading and contemplation
suggested b" the #ourth mime. 1he mime #eatures two women- &oritto and Metro-
discussing a dildo that &oritto has acuired #rom a certain &erdon- who runs a secret
business out o# his home. &oritto has loaned the dildo to her #riend Euboule- who in
turned loaned it to Possis. 4t is #rom Possis that Metro #irst learned o# the dildo's
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 63/95
57
e2istence and became interested in acuiring one #or hersel#- prompting her %isit to
&oritto. >n the sur#ace- then- the mime is simpl" about two women chatting about the
best place to bu" dildos. A deeper meaning- howe%er- emerges when looking more
closel" at the language emplo"ed b" Herodas and recogni@ing his tendenc" to comment
seriousl" on his own poetr".
)erhaps the most clear signal that Herodas will use the dildo as a metaphor #or
his own poetr" is the repetition o# the %erb `^R Jto stitchOῥ used in re#erence to its
construction./,7 1his %erb appears at lines /7- 50- 5=- 57- and 9/. acob Stern has
con%incingl" argued that the baubon o# interest in the si2th mime is an e2cellent parallel
#or Herodas' own poetr"+ ugl" on the sur#ace- but with Jhidden la"ers o# meaning.O/,6 4t
is a particularl" apt metaphor #or Herodas' new genre mimiambos- which- as discussed
pre%iousl" in relation to the eighth mime- combines the low;brow- %ulgar subject matter
o# mime with the biting aesthetic and ethical criticism #ound in Hipponactean iamboi .
&erdon's dildos are much the same./0 >n the sur#ace the" are an object #ew respectable
reek women would pro#ess to ownD/0/ e%en Herodas' women are concerned with the
harm that ma" be done to their reputations b" public knowledge o# their possession o#
such an object- as seen when Metro asks &oritto i# she will slander her i# she re%eals the
name o# the dildo's maker ]VXV[ I U [ `R ῖ 3 ἴ - lines ,,;,0. Yet beneath an Jugl"O
e2terior is a great deal o# cra#tsmanship- such that &oritto compares &erdon's skill to
/,7!ord /677 discusses the connection o# the %erb to terms such as a VK ]I and VK ]\V- as well asῥ ῳ ῥ ῳthe metaphorical use re#erring to the composition o# poetr". See also Stern /6=6- ,90##.
/,6Stern /6=6- ,9,./01he %er" topic o# dildos links Herodas to the most #amous author o# mimes- his predecessor Sophron.
4t is uite possible that Sophron's mimes #eatured women %iewing dildos- perhaps in a setting morelike that seen in Herodas' se%enth mime. See Hordern ,5 on #ragments ,0 and ,9.
/0/ 1he e2ception- perhaps- might be on the comic stage- where one would almost be shocked to learn o# a woman who did not possess a dildo
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 64/95
58
that o# Athena ^ I FZUV\ZI V ^ I G U ̂ I [ GVI- yTG]RUI- ][I- lines 89;ῆ % ὐ ῆ ὀ ῆ ὰ 4 ῖ ὐ ὶ
8=. 1his is reminiscent o# the #ourth mime when &okkale is struck b" a relie# car%ing
^V ^ G[ I FZUV\ZU LfKV ̂ QV- lines 9=;97.ῦ ἐ ῖ % ὰ So- too- does the description o#
&erdon's cra#tsmanship ^ I [ GVI-ὰ ῖ line 88 echo &"nno's praise o# Apelles'
cra#tsmanship in the #ourth mime ZFUV\ Nἀ [ G[I- ῖ line =,.
&oritto continues to sing &erdon's praises in the #ollowing lines. 1he baubon is
wonder#ull" straight GF- line =.ὀ 1he straps are made o# a so#t wool- not leather ἰ
] WVU^\Q G- Q WU^[I-ἰ ἔ ὐ ἰ lines =/;=,. 3hen describing the smoothness or
so#tness o# the dildo &oritto uses a highl" literar" phrase- comparing it to sleep ἀ ἠ
WVVQ^ZI `UI- line =/.ὔ /0, 1he e##ect o# the women's commentar" is to draw attention
to the dildo as a work o# art- not merel" a se2 to". <eaders or perhaps %iewers who do
not probe past the sur#ace o# the mime would doubtlessl" ha%e been entertained b" the
comic themes-/00 while those who look #or a deeper meaning are rewarded b" another
glimpse o# Herodas' keen sel#;awareness and concern with presenting his poetr" in a
sophisticated light.
Another element o# aesthetic criticism in the si2th mime deser%ing o# attention is
the re#erence to two well known #emale poets- Possis and Erinna. 3hen &oritto asks
Metro where she'd seen the dildo- Metro tells her that Possis- the daughter o# Erinna-
had it ~ I [ [U G\UUZI- line ,. ὶ ἶ ἠ 1he use o# these names can be no small
coincidence. Both were rough contemporaries o# Herodas- and well known poets at
/0, 1he most ob%ious comparison noted b" man" commentators is to Iliad /.,+ WVVQ ][]WZW Uῷ 5`U .1 ῳ 1heocritus also pro%ides se%eral parallels- such as at Idyll 9.9/+ `UR WVVQ^[GV- or /9./,9+1
WVVQ^[G `UR.1 See also Stern /6=6- ,90./00 See !innegan /66,- ,6;05 #or one such e2ample o# a reading where emphasis is gi%en to the ob%ious
Jcomic depra%it"O o# the women.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 65/95
59
that./05 4t would appear that Herodas makes another allusion to the same women in the
se%enth mime. &erdon- the shoemaker- o##ers a long list o# the %arious shoe st"les he has
a%ailable- among which are JPossisesO ~\][I- line 9= and JBaukisesO zV_Q\][I-
line 97. Baukis is- o# course- the companion o# Erinna- to whom the Dista++ is directed.
1he bawd" nature o# the si2th and se%enth mimes at #irst encourages the %iew that
Herodas intends to insult these #emale poets. Headlam and &no2 remarks that Jthe
choice o# two such names proceeds clearl" #rom malicious c"nicism.O/09 i%en the
prominence o# aesthetic criticism in iambic poetr"- this %iew is certainl" de#ensible.
1here is another possible %iew- howe%er- that 4 #ind more compelling.
ackie Murra" has suggested that Herodas' re#erences are not intended as insults-
but rather that the si2th and se%enth mimes together suggest Jimitation and pla"#ul
appreciationO o# poetic contributions made b" Erinna and Possis./08 1he ke"- according
to Murra"- is recogni@ing that mimes si2 and se%en #orm a dip"tch./0= Murra" suggests
that si2 and se%en together metaphoricall" allude to Herodas himsel# consciousl"
writing a dip"tchD the sewing o# the dildos in the si2th mime and shoe;making in the
se%enth are both metaphors #or writing poetr". 4 ha%e alread" noted that the re#erences
to Possis and Erinna are ob%ious. Scholars generall" accept that mimes si2 and se%en
ought to be read together- and the assertion that the" #orm a dip"tch seems #air. 3hat
connection- then- is there between Herodas' re#erence to Possis and Erinna- and the
/05 anker ,6- ad. loc. dates Erinna to the #irst hal# o# the third centur" and Possis to the #irst twent" "ears o# the third centur". Some debate e2ists concerning Erinna's +loruit - but this is generall"accepted.
/09 Headlam and &no2 /6,,- ad. loc. Cunningham /6=/- ad. loc. e2presses the same %iew- and alsoadds that this Jis one o# the %er" #ew occasions when Herodasq is not totall" impersonal.O
/08 Murra" ,7./0= See <ist /660 and &ut@ko ,8.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 66/95
60
dipt"ch as a poetic techniue Murra"'s response depends on earlier scholarship
showing that Erinna's epigrams dealing with Baukis ow;)age / and , are an e2ample
o# a dip"tch. ?eaping o## #rom here- Murra" suggests that Herodas is signaling a poetic
debt to his poetic predecessor's techniue.
3hether or not one accepts Murra"'s %iew is not essential to the point 4 would
like to make regarding the signi#icance o# Herodas' decision to include a re#erence to
these two #amous poets. 1he %er" #act that he does make a re#erence to Possis and
Erinna at all is just as important as wh" he does so. 3hate%er one belie%es Herodas'
moti%ations #or including the re#erence is- either as a respect#ul nod to a #ellow poet or
as an in%ecti%e barb- the same thing can be said+ it is another e2ample o# Herodas
adopting an aesthetic position and pla"ing the role o# aesthetic critic. $nderstood in a
positi%e light the re#erence embraces and praises Erinna's use o# the dip"tch structure in
her poems. ?ikewise- i# interpreted as an in%ecti%e barb the re#erence attempts to
e2clude Erinna and Possis #rom the poetic communit". 1his is consistent with the
persona o# the iambographer and the aims o# in%ecti%e poetr"- which ine%itabl"
pri%ileges one group while e2cluding another./07 Both interpretations support the
primar" argument made in this chapter that Herodas' mimes are concerned with
aesthetic criticism- particularl" in relation to poetics.
2.: Conclusion
1he aim o# this chapter has been to identi#" #irst Herodas' connection to an
/07See Pappa /666- ,88 on this point. He is concerned with Catullus- but the general points made in hisarticle regarding iambic poetr"- speci#icall" o# the in%ecti%e %ariet"- are pertinent to this discussion.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 67/95
61
established tradition o# aesthetic and ethical criticism present in iambic poetr"-
speci#icall" in the poetr" o# Hippona2 and authors who adopt a Hipponactean persona.
1his is e%ident primaril" in the eighth mime- in which Herodas openl" identi#ies himsel#
as a literar" descendant o# Hippona2 and demonstrates both a keen awareness o# his
place in the poetic tradition and a desire to de#ine the manner in which his poetr" is
recei%ed. Attention was then paid to points in the mimes where Herodas comments on
contemporar" Hellenistic aesthetic ualities o# art and his own poetr". 4 e2amined the
#ourth mime in detail and proposed that in it Herodas pro%ides an Janti;modelO #or his
audience. He rejects the indi%idual who #ocuses onl" on the realistic ualities o# his
mime without being mo%ed to deeper contemplation and commentar". 1he si2th mime
pro%ides a use#ul model #or this with %arious la"ers o# interpretation. >n the sur#ace the
mime is little more than a comic- perhaps misog"nist- sketch o# two women discussing
dildos. ?ook closer- howe%er- and the dildo becomes a remarkabl" #it metaphor #or
Herodas' own art- demonstrating again a strong awareness o# the generic pressures o#
mimos and iambos e%er present in his poetr". Such e2amples re%eal- in m" opinion- that
while Herodas' mimes are meant to be entertaining and comical- the" are also keenl"
interested in serious topics. 4 will continue e2ploring this in the coming chapter #ocusing
on ethical criticism in his mimes.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 68/95
62
Chapter #: Ethical Criticism in Herodas! Mimiamboi
#.1: The eneric Interest of Iambos in Ethical Criticism
1his chapter will #ocus on what 4 ha%e elsewhere called ethical criticism. 4 would
like to begin b" de#ining what 4 mean b" this term- to a%oid con#usion with the phrase o#
the same name coined b" Porthrop !r"e in his /69= work Anatomy o+ riticism. 4 use
ethical criticism in this paper to re#er to the ethical or moral judgment o# the beha%ior o#
an indi%idual or group. 4n some cases these judgmental statements are clearl"
concerned with promoting one set o# %alues o%er another. More o#ten- howe%er-
statements in Herodas and his iambic predecessors pronouncing ethical judgments are
inherent in a %erbal assault on another character #or a percei%ed #law or moral #ailure.
1his is a ke" element o# iambic poetr"- as 4 ha%e alread" discussed pre%iousl" and will
demonstrate in more detail below. 1he %er" act o# insulting an indi%idual's conduct
rein#orces and promotes the %alue s"stem #a%ored b" the in%ecti%e %oice./06
>ne de#ining #eature o# iambic poetr" is a statement o# blame or censure- a
psogos./5 1hese statements are o#ten couched in hostile terms as personal attacks on
the character or beha%ior o# the addressed indi%idual. Ethical judgments o# the attacked
indi%idual's conduct are o#ten inherent in such attacks. 3hile in%ecti%e assaults ma" be
humorous or entertaining- the" are also o# a serious nature- as the" can be used to
establish the Jboundaries o# ethical conduct.O/5/ 4t is possible to trace this tradition o#
/06 Pappa /666- ,88./5Hughes ,,- ,9 and ,/7D <osen /677D <otstein ,/- 78;6=D Bowie ,/- /;=. 4t is o# course
important to note- as man" o# these scholars do- that psogos is not a #eature o# all iambic poems. 4nother words- a poem can be classi#ied as iambos e%en i# it lacks a direct %erbal attack.
/5/ Acosta;Hughes ,,- ,,.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 69/95
63
ethical criticism in iambic poetr" #rom Archilochus and Hippona2 down to Hellenistic
writers o# iambs- such as Callimachus- and e%en #urther to ?atin iambic poetr"- which is
best e2empli#ied b" man" o# the in%ecti%e poems o# Catullus./5, A close reading o#
Herodas' mimes re%eals that he shares the same interest in ethical criticism as his #ellow
iambographers. 1his should come as no real surprise gi%en his clear e##ort to locate
himsel# and his poems in the iambic tradition.
*espite the common presence o# ethical critical statements in the mimes and
other more traditional e2amples o# iambic- it should be ob%ious that there is a major
di##erence between Herodas and authors such as Archilochus and Hippona2. Statements
o# an ethical nature in the other iambographers are issued #rom the mouth o# a poetic
persona in the #irst person and o#ten directed against an e2ternal ri%al who is easil"
imagined b" the audience as a real indi%idual./50 1his is not the case in Herodas- where
the statements are ine%itabl" placed in the mouths o# characters within the mimes- and
generall" made in response to another character's actions- though not necessaril"
phrased as an insult. 4n Herodas- an additional la"er is created between the poet and his
poem b" the #act that ethical statements are issued b" characters- not the poetic persona.
1his makes it necessar" #or the audience to consider care#ull" the source o# an"
statement when e%aluating its intended message- much like Herodas demanded o# his
audience in the #ourth mime. As discussed abo%e in the section on aesthetic criticism-
this creates di##iculties in interpreting such statements and the author's own %iew. 1his
di##icult" will become more clear when looking at speci#ic e2amples in the mimes. !irst-
/5, See Pappa /666 on Catullus' in%ecti%e poems./50 <osen /677 e2amines archaic iambographers' interest in using humorous names #or the characters
in their poems. Some characters ma" be representati%e o# real li#e indi%iduals- while others are simpl"#ictional.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 70/95
64
howe%er- it will be help#ul to look brie#l" at e2amples o# ethical criticism in other
iambographers- both to show that ethical criticism is a common #eature o# iambic poetr"
and to pro%ide e2amples o# the t"pes o# ethical statements common in the iambic poets.
Archilochus is a good starting point #or e2amples o# ethical criticism in earl"
iambic poetr". 4 would like to start #irst with #ragment /,5b 3est- which is clearl"
concerned with ethical beha%ior. 1he te2t is as #ollows+
` U ] `\URU QV V\QGZ^U WTF_-ὸ ὲ ὶ ^[ ̂ WU [ [U[\QVI ..............ὔ ῖ ἰ ] W U QZF[ I ....... F[I V ] \I-ὐ ὲ ὲ ὶ 6 7 ὴ •[€ LV^ G UU ^[ QV GTUVI `VGvLVL[Uἀ ὴ ὶ
[ I UV][\ZU.ἰ ἀ
*rinking much and unmi2ed wine-neither ha%ing chipped in #or the cost NNnor ha%ing been in%ited NN "ou showed up as i# "ou were a #riend- but "our bell" led both "our mind and wits astra" to shamelessness.
1his poem is directed at a certain )ericles- who was e%identl" in the habit o# crashing
dinner parties./55 3hile lacking the %iolent- abusi%e language #ound in man" o#
Hippona2' poems and #or which Archilochus- too- was known-/59 the ethical statement
is clear. 1he use o# the term UV\][Vἀ signals that Archilochus is targeting the ethical
shortcomings o# his enem". 4nherent in Archilochus' poem is a condemnation o#
/55Athenaeus /./5 &aibel./59 Archilochus' malice is most o#ten directed at ?"cambes. Ancient testimonia preser%e the popular stor"
that Archilochus grew angr" with ?"cambes a#ter he reneged on an agreement to allow the poet tomarr" his daughter- Peoboule. Archilochus responded b" writing abusi%e poems directed at ?"cambes
and his daughter- which led to them committing suicide. 1he %eracit" o# this account is surel" suspect-and is better understood as e%idence #or the ancient %iew o# the e2pected persona o# an iambographerrather than as reliable biograph". So- too- should the stor" o# Hippona2 and the sculptors- Boupalusand Athenis- which is clearl" in#luenced b" the pseudo;biographical Archilochean tradition- betreated. See Care" /678. Hawkins ,7 has recentl" looked at the relationship between
Archilochus and ?"cambes- and proposed that ?"cambes pla"ed the role o# a poetic ri%al- whocritiued iambos as a genre and also ga%e %oice to ethical and aesthetic concerns. Archilochus' poemsrespond to this criticism. 1he poet responding to criticism and justi#"ing his st"le and the genre within
which he or she is working reminds me o# Herodas' eighth mime and his attempts to de#end himsel#against his critics- while also demonstrating that his new genre is legitimate.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 71/95
65
glutton". Pumerous other e2amples could be cited #rom Archilochus' corpus- but #or this
paper it is enough to show that ethical judgment o# beha%ior is a general #eature o#
Archilochus' poetr".
Hippona2 #ollowed Archilochus' e2ample and cra#ted poems that #eatured biting
in%ecti%e loaded with ethical criticism. A common target o# his is Boupalus- who has
been discussed brie#l" abo%e. )h"sical threats against Boupalus are commonD in %arious
#ragments the poetic %oice threatens to hit him in the #ace QKR z_`_ ^ Uὸ
FVWUὀ - *egani !r. /,/ and in another makes a re#erence to causing him to cr"
QV\[U Q[[fRU zf`VU- *egani !r. 78- line /7. $n#ortunatel" in neither o# these
#ragments do we see an e2ample o# ethical censure. Still- ethical terms are applied to
Boupalus in other #ragments- suggesting that when Hippona2 targets him it is o#ten to
point out a moral #ailure. 1he adjecti%e ^VI is applied to him in #ragment /7-
doubtlessl" in its pejorati%e sense. 4n #ragment , we see a better e2ample o# ethical
criticism- when Hippona2 re#ers to Boupalus as a WZ^GQ\^ZI- an incestuous indi%idual.
1hough such se2ual insults are commonplace- the" still depend on ethical norms to ha%e
an" e##ectD in this case the attack is predicated on the ethical standard o# an indi%idual
re#raining #rom incestuous relations./58 3hile the #ragmentar" nature o# the
Hipponactean corpus makes e2tensi%e anal"sis di##icult- it is ne%ertheless clear #rom
these #ragments that his poems #eatured an interest in ethical standards.
>ne #inal e2ample #rom Hippona2' corpus ma" ser%e as additional e%idence that
he engaged in criticism o# indi%iduals #or #ailing to meet ethical standards./5= 1he
/58Catullus o##ers an interesting later parallel. His poems aimed at ellius 77;6/- #or instance all attackellius #or incestuous beha%ior.
/5= See Acosta;Hughes ,,- 0,##. on criticism in Hippona2. Also o# interest is <osen /677- whoanal"@es Hippona2' relationship with Boupalus and the con%entional #orm o# iambic blame poetr".
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 72/95
66
Strasbourg epode- edited #irst in /766 b" <eit@enstein- is the best e%idence #or this./57 4n
this poem the iambic persona e2presses the desire that he see his enem" su##er a terrible
#ate as a shipwrecked sla%e in 1hrace *egani !r. /65- lines 5;/5. ># greater interest is
the reasons that the narrator gi%es #or this wish. He states that his enem" has wronged
him W ]\QZ[ἠ 3 line /9 and trampled on an oath q ] ` GQ\I XZ- line /9.ἐ ὁ ἔ 1he
se%erit" o# such transgressions is highlighted b" the #inal preser%ed line- in which it is
re%ealed that the betra"er was a close #riend o# the iambic persona ^ `G U ^V GIὸ ὶ 8 ῖ
ἐqU- line /8. 1he implications o# justice and moralit" suggested b" Hippona2' use o#
weight" words such as ]\QZ[ἠ and GQ\Iὁ indicates the poem's concern with ethical
criticism. 1he punishment suggested in the opening lines o# the poem is the recompense
demanded b" the poet #or the #ailure to adhere to ethical standards.
1he iambic poems o# Callimachus show clear traces o# Hipponactean in#luence./56
Statements %oicing ethical concerns can be #ound in %arious poems. 4 will look onl"
brie#l" at one o# these- the #i#th iamb )#ei##er !r. /69./9 4t is e%ident at se%eral places in
the poem that the poetic %oice considers himsel# a moral guide #or the subject o# the
poem- a certain schoolmaster named Apollonius- according to the diegesis. He classi#ies
his words as _WX_v line /- meaning counsel or ad%ice. 4n addition- he calls himsel#
a Bakis- S"bil- laurel- and an oak tree L zQI ^ QV \X_V QV ]UZἐ - ὶ ὶ QV ZLI ὶ -
/57See &irkwood /68/ #or discussion o# the authorship o# this piece and the histor" o# scholarship prior
to the publication o# his article. >n the basis o# Jst"le and spiritO &irkwood argues that this pieceactuall" belongs to Archilochus. 4n the #i#t" inter%ening "ears since the publication o# &irkwood'sarticle- howe%er- scholars ha%e mo%ed awa" #rom this %iew in #a%or o# identi#"ing Hippona2 as theauthor this #ragment. See Acosta;Hughes ,,- ,,o- and *egani /670- /87##.
/56See Acosta;Hughes ,,- ,/;/5 #or an e2cellent in;depth discussion o# the in#luence Hippona2 hadon Callimachus' poems. &erkhecker /666 touches on Callimachus' debt to Hippona2 in %ariousplacesD see pp. ,7;0 on the #irst iamb and pp. /50;/58 on the #i#th iamb. Cameron /669- 0=,;0=0discusses how Callimachus a%oided #ollowing Hipponactean con%entions. Hippona2' in#luence onCallimachus is thus betra"ed b" the latter poet's e##orts to distinguish himsel# #rom his predecessor.
/9Another e2ample is the third iamb. Acosta;Hughes ,, deals e2tensi%el" with this poem.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 73/95
67
lines 0/;0,- all o# which are associated with prophec" and di%inel" inspired ad%ice.
1hus- the speaker's ad%ice is gi%en additional #orce. $n#ortunatel"- the preser%ed
#ragments do not contain a direct re#erence to ethical #ailings o# Apollonius. 1he
diegesis- howe%er- re%eals that Apollonius was engaging in inappropriate se2ual
acti%ities with his studentsD this is hinted at in the preser%ed lines b" re#erences to a
burning #lame line ,5 and horses lines ,8;,6- both o# which are common metaphors
#or erotic lo%e. Callimachus has here clearl" targeted the se2ual misconduct o# an
indi%idual and warned him to re#orm his beha%ior. Po psogos is e%ident in the
remaining #ragments- but the basic iambic interest in censuring unethical beha%ior is
present.
As Callimachus' #i#th iamb demonstrates- iambic poems need not alwa"s contain
a psogos and censured indi%idual. 1his will be seen in Herodas' mimes as well- and ma"
also be obser%ed in other iambic poems. 1he Hellenistic poet Cercidas is an illuminating
e2ample. He- like Herodas- #used together two pre%iousl" distinct genres melic poetr"
and iambic poetr" to #orm a new one- meliambos./9/ Man" o# Cercidas' poems e2plore
general philosophical and ethical issues without attacking the conduct o# a particular
indi%idual. 1his same tendenc" is e%ident in some poems o# Archilochus- too- in which
he deals with general philosophical topics without attacking an indi%idual.
#.2: Ethical %tatements in Herodas
Ha%ing looked at e2amples o# ethical criticism in other iambic authors 4 would
now like to turn to Herodas. 4t becomes apparent a#ter looking at e2amples #rom
/9/ See Cruces and *aroca /665 #or discussion o# the uniue meter o# Cercidas' poems.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 74/95
68
Herodas' mime that his ethical statements are not alwa"s #ramed as a direct attack on
another indi%idual. 1he e2amples discussed below do all #eature con#rontation o# two
indi%iduals- which is reminiscent o# the con#lict between poetic %oice and enem" in the
traditional iambic in%ecti%e poems- but do not necessaril" contain a psogos in the
traditional iambic sense o# the term. )resent in the mimes that 4 will discuss is an
interest in ele%ated philosophical and moral issues. 1he lack o# an authoritati%e poetic
%oice in the mimes necessitates placement o# these ethical critical statements in the
mouths o# Herodas' characters- who in most cases- 4 belie%e- are not e%en aware o# the
serious nature o# the ethical issues inherent in their own statements. 1he #act that such
ele%ated concerns are present in scenes #eaturing low class characters who o#ten e2hibit
traits o# stock comic characters is consistent with the ironic tension in Herodas' scenes
#eaturing aesthetic criticism- and was probabl" intended #or humorous purposes. Still-
the ethical issues presented in the mimes are o# great importance- and so while Herodas'
own %iews ma" be impossible to discern- it is at least worth noticing that he is concerned
with serious uestions that were likel" o# interest to an elite audience. 1he #act that the
poems are concerned with topics o# general interest to Herodas' audience is more
important than uestions regarding Herodas' own %iews- as it is uite possible that the
%iews e2pressed within his poem do not re#lect the his own personal %iews.
#.2.1: Mimiamb Three and $arent-Child elationships
1he third mime #eatures a mother Metrotime complaining about her son
&ottalos to his school master ?ampriskos. 1he #irst 9= lines o# the mime are de%oted
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 75/95
69
to Metrotime's monologue- in which the beha%ior o# her son is related to the
schoolteacher. &ottalos is a poor student who would rather spend his da"s gambling
than stud"ing. He neglects his lessons lines 7;/7 and is uick to run awa" #rom home
should his parents scold him 08;5/. His antics ha%e not onl" caused Metrotime mental
an2iet"- but ha%e also brought #inancial troubles upon her home Q W[_ ̂ VV\UZI ^ Uἔ ὴ
^TLZU `[`GFZQ[U- line 9D see also lines 55;56. ?ampriskos responds to Metrotime's
complaints b" promising to punish her son lines 97;=. &ottalos is hoisted up on the
shoulders o# some o# the other students and whipped lines =/;6, !inall"- he is let go-
and the mime ends with Metrotime resol%ing to put chains on his #eet to ensure he
comes to school in the #uture lines 65;6=.
>bscured b" Metrotime's %icious language and cruel desire to see her son
whipped she urges ?ampriskos not to stop thrashing him ][ Q V-ὐ ῖ ἐ ῆ
‚VW`G\Q[x ][ GU GI I ]f ῖ ἄ 3 ῃ- lines 7=;77 is a hint o# the reciprocal- nurturing
relationship that e2isted between parent and child in the ancient reek world./9, A
parent would take care o# a de#enseless child with the e2pectation that the same child
would care #or the elderl" parent when he or she could no longer do so. 1his e2pectation
meant that parents were e2pected to in%est in their child's education and upbringing
with the understanding that the" themsel%es would someda" reap the rewards o# their
earl" e##orts. E%idence o# this institution is #ound as earl" as Hesiod in his description o#
the conditions that will e2ist among mortals o# the iron age just be#ore eus destro"s
them in the -orks and Days. 4n addition to general stri#e between kinsmen- Hesiod
/9, 1he Athenian tragedians were especiall" interested in this relationship. See Mc*ermott /6763 7/;60#or a discussion o# the importance o# this institution in Athenian societ" and the implications o#
%iolating its tenets- speci#icall" in re#erence to Euripides' Medea.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 76/95
70
remarks speci#icall" on the #ailure o# children to nurture their elderl" parents ]Tὐ Wὲ U
L[ LZGU^[ ̂ Q[ U ` FG[`^vGV ] [U 9 ῦ ἀ ὸ ῖ - lines /7=;/77.
1he implications that &ottalos' beha%ior ha%e #or Metrotime's own #uture is
suggesti%e o# an interest in the reciprocal nurturing relationship that e2ists between
them. Metrotime emphasi@es the lack o# resources a%ailable to her and her husband-
which in turn highlights the importance o# &ottalos' education #or their #uture well;
being. Metrotime is willing to make sacri#ices in the present- perhaps recogni@ing it as
an in%estment in her #uture. She calls attention to the di##iculties o# pa"ing the
schoolmaster QV ^GZQ I `QGv ̂ U WF U V ^[ Q U ̂ ~VUUQ_ QVfR ὶ ὰ ἠ ὸ ὸ ἰ ῖ ' ὰ - lines 6;
/- and again to the price o# the roo# tiles ^G\ WVFV QV\_V Q^_ ^3 ἐ ῦ
`V^fWV^I ^\UR- lines 59;58 broken b" &ottalos climbing about on the roo#. Her
characteri@ation o# her husband as an old man who has problems with his ears and e"es
LTGRU U G \U ̂ [ Q WWVU QWURUἀ ὴ ( * - line 0, is- perhaps- a glimpse o# her own
#uture- when she hersel# will be dependent on another #or sur%i%al. So- too- is the e##ect
when she mentions the limited means o# &ottalos' grandmother- whose generosit" is
taken ad%antage o# b" her son ^ U WWWZU- LGZ U L_UV QV Q GVU U X\_-ἀ ὰ ὴ : ῖ ( ὴ
Q[\G[- lines 07;06. All the passages cited abo%e either emphasi@e the present po%ert" o#
the #amil"- caused at least in part b" Metrotime's decision to send her son to school- or
look ahead to the #uture- when Metrotime in her old age will rel" on her son.
3hile the pre%ious e2amples hint at an interest in the reciprocal- nurturing
relationship between parent and child- an e%en more ob%ious re#erence can be #ound.
3hile lamenting &ottalos' inabilit" to spell- Metrotime remarks that it was #oolish #or
her to ha%e sent him to school instead o# to the #ields ^ LRL [ `V U_U WV_^vU-* ἔ ἶ ἄ ἐ
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 77/95
71
^I Q U_I XQ[U V ^ U ]]QR- LGVWW^RU ] `V][\ZU-3 ὐ # ὐ ὸ ὲ lines ,8;,7. She
#ollows up this remark with an e2planation o# the reason that she wanted him to ha%e an
education+ to pro%ide support #or her in her old age ]Q[ GRL U ^ I RG\ZI [Uῦ ἀ ὸ ῆ ἀ ἔ -
line ,6. 1his clear statement o# her reasons #or sending &ottalos to school help #rame
her entire monologue- and is suggesti%e o# a philosophical concern be"ond what might
be e2pected #rom an otherwise comical scene./90 4mplicit in the scene is the #ear o#
parents that e##orts to educate their children in hopes o# securing a better #uture #or
themsel%es will #ail- and that their children will #ail to hold up their end o# the mutuall"
bene#icial relationship that e2ists between parent and child. 1his would amount to a
major ethical #ailure on &ottalos' part.
4t is impossible to assert with an" certaint" Herodas' reasons #or including this
element o# ethical criticism in his mimes besides the ob%ious point mentioned
pre%iousl"- that ethical criticism is a #eature o# iambic authors- which Herodas considers
himsel# to be. 4t cannot be shown that the statement is indicati%e o# Herodas' own %iews-
since his %iewpoint has been thoroughl" obscured b" the additional la"er o# separation
that results #rom the ethical pronouncement being issued b" a character o# the mime
instead o# b" the narrati%e %oice o# the poetic person common in the e2amples #rom
iambic poetr" discussed abo%e. 4 think it likel" in this mime and the other e2amples to
be discussed shortl" that Herodas' aim in including elements o# ethical criticism in his
mimes is to #orce his audience to consider- #or at least a brie# moment- deeper
philosophical issues. 3hile Metrotime might come across as a humorousl" o%erbearing
/90 anker ,6- =6 sees parallels in Pew Comed" and )lautine comed" in ?ampriskos and Metrotime.See also pp. 69;6= #or anal"sis o# the humor in this particular mime.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 78/95
72
mother #or much o# the mime- at the core o# her complaints whether she is aware o# it
or not is an important issue likel" rele%ant to the majorit" o# Herodas' audience. 4# the"
are the t"pe o# audience member that is mo%ed to contemplation b" art- that is- i# the"
are unlike the women in the #ourth mime- then the" will laugh- but while laughing the"
will also think. 1his is an appropriate response to Herodas' poetr"- which mi2es low
humor with ele%ated concerns- producing a constant tension that demands to be
e2plored.
#.2.2: Mimiamb 'i4e and the %tatus of %la4es
1he #i#th mime pro%ides "et another instance in which serious philosophical
concerns lurk beneath the sur#ace o# what is- otherwise- a scene reminiscent o# the comic
stage. 4n this case it is Bitinna- a woman o# unclear social and marital status- who
Herodas humorousl" emplo"s as an unconscious %oice #or such concerns./95 1he
uestion at hand in the #i#th mime is that o# the indistinct status o# a sla%e as a
possessable object and human. Herodas creates considerable tension b" using one o# the
most Jt"rannicalO and cruel characters in his entire corpus to lend a %oice to such an
ele%ated philosophical and moral issue. 1he basic premise o# the mime is simple.
Bitinna is angr" with her sla%e astron- with whom she has had a se2ual relationship-
#or taking up with another woman. 4n a rage she decides to punish himD most o# the
mime consists o# Bitinna speaking with astron- tr"ing to ascertain his guilt and decide
/95 See anker ,6- /90;99 #or discussion o# Bitinna's status. Po decisi%e statement can be made onthe matterD Bitinna ma" be married- widowed- or independent. !ountoulakis ,= has proposedthat she ma" be a hetaira or a woman o# similar social standing. Arnott /6=/ argues that she ismarried and not a hetaira. Cunningham /6=/ does not comment on her status- e2cept to sa" that sheis a J#ree woman.O See also &onstan /676.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 79/95
73
on a suitable punishment. E%er present in the dialogue is the contrast between ] Iῦ
and UFGR`I-ἄ both categories to which astron belongs. 4n the background is the
uestion o# how to reconcile belonging to both.
!ollowing Bitinna's opening lines in which she accuses astron o# sleeping with
another woman lines /;0 is astron's assertion that he is- in #act- a sla%e and that she
ma" treat him as she desires ] I [ Wx G ^ Xf W- line 8. Yet his status isῦ ἰ ῶ # ῃ
e%identl" not so clear as it #irst appears. Bitinna remarks that she was responsible #or
raising him up to a rank among humans L W- ƒ^GRU- [ F[ V U UFG`I-ἐ ; 3 ῖ ἐ ἀ
line /9./99 Appropriate #or such an ele%ated discussion is Bitinna's use o# the ethical %erb
WVG^UR line /8 to describe her #ailure in judgment when she raised him up to a le%el<
o# societ" usuall" inaccessible to sla%es. Bitinna then shi#ts- telling astron he needs to
learn that he is a sla%e and her propert" ][ ^[fU[Q [ I ] I QV ^G[ I `TG [_ ῖ ὀ ἰ ῦ ὶ ῖ ὐ
WU I FZQV LUQ[U- lines ,;,/.) ἔ 4n just , lines astron has identi#ied himsel# as a
] I- while Bitinna has stated that she ga%e him a place amongῦ UFGR`- be#ore=
again reminding him that he is- in #act- a sla%e. 1he alternating use o# the opposed terms
should draw an attenti%e and re#lecti%e audience member's attention to astron's odd
status.
!ollowing Bitinna's order gi%en to another sla%e to bind astron comes a new
protest #rom astron. He asks Bitinna to #orgi%e his mistake [I W ̂ U WVG^\ZUἄ ὴ <
^Vf^ZU- line ,8. He continues to protest- claiming that he is onl" human a#ter all- and
that he simpl" made a mistake UFGR`I [ W- WVG^U-ἄ ἰ ἥ line ,=. astron's use o#
/99 4 am reminded here o# the cena in )etronius' Satyricon- in which the #reedman 1rimalchio- angered with his wi#e !ortunata- reminds her that he is largel" responsible #or her current #ree status+ demachina illam sustuli, hominem inter homines +eci =5.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 80/95
74
WVG^UR and the related WVG^\V< < echo Bitinna's earlier language in line /8. Bitinna-
howe%er- rejects his claim b" ordering him o## to the v^G[U line 0,- a place where
sla%es were punished and a word #amiliar to the comic stage./98 astron's #inal words are
spoken at line 06D he will remain present Jon stage-O so to speak- but silent. astron's
status as a sla%e initiall" appears to be certain a#ter this pointD he is re#erred to as a
#ellow sla%e fU]_U- line 98- b" &"dilla- who will be discussed below- and as a
se%en#old;sla%e 8`^]_U- line =9 b" Bitinna./9= 1rue to Bitinna's inabilit" to make
up her mind earlier in the mime- howe%er- she re%erts again to calling him an UFGR`Iἄ
line =7. 1his is the #inal term she applies to him.
Beginning at line 06 with astron's last spoken line a new sla%e comes to the
#ore#ront- one who also occupies a con#used position in Bitinna's household. 1his sla%e-
named &"dilla she is #irst mentioned at line 6D this same name is gi%en to another sla%e
in the #ourth mime- is twice identi#ied as a ]fZ lines 55 and 95 b" Bitinna. &"dilla is
sent b" Bitinna to bring back astron a#ter she has sent him awa" to the v^G[U to be
whipped- as she has changed her mind and now wishes him to be tattooed instead./97
&"dilla intercedes on astron's behal#- calling upon Bitinna b" the endearing term ^V^\
line 86 and pra"ing that her daughter- Bat"llis- #inds a good husband and gi%es her
grandchildren lines 86;=/. She asks Bitinna to #orgi%e [I- line =, astron'sἄ
mistake ̂ U W\VU ^Vf^ZU WVG^\ZU- lines =,;=0- echoing the %er" same language usedὴ <
b" both characters earlier in the mime. Bitinna is at #irst unwilling to relent- but she
/98 See Headlam and &no2 /6,, and anker ,6- ad. loc. #or comic parallels. anker also mentionsthe tendenc" in <oman comed" o# sending a sla%e to the carni+e( as a ?atin eui%alent.
/9= Cunningham /6=/- ad. loc. sa"s that `^]_U is Jcomic e2aggeration.Oἐ 1he phrase also appears inHippona2 *egani !r. /6- line ,. See also anker ,6- ad. loc.
/97 See ones /67= on tattooing in antiuit". See pp. /5=;57 speci#icall" #or tattooing as a punishment#or sla%es.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 81/95
75
#inall" does so- citing her lo%e #or &"dilla as the reason. She sa"s that she lo%es &"dilla
no less than her own daughter U ] U U zV^_\]V ^TGLR- line 7, and' ὐ ὲ 6 '
mentions that she raised &"dilla with her own hands U ^ἐ ῇ [G ^ ὶ ῇI Wἐ ῇ FGTKVV-
line 70. Bitinna's use o# the %erb ^TGLR to lo%e is important- as this is the %erb used
o# the lo%e between parent and child./96 Also important is the %erb ^GTR- which is used
to describe the nurturing and rearing o# a child. &"dilla's status is- like astron's-
con#used. She is %er" clearl" re#erred to as a ]fZ- "et Bitinna's language is also
re#lecti%e o# a mother;daughter relationship. 1he status o# both characters is
intentionall" le#t ambiguous.
As in the third mime- no clear ethical message emerges #rom the #i#th mime and
no de#initi%e boundaries #or ethical conduct are established. 1here is perhaps a general
interest in the status o# sla%es and what it means to be an UFGR`I present in the #i#thἄ
mime- but it would be a gross o%erstatement and misreading o# the te2t to draw an"
de#inite conclusion as to what Herodas' own %iews were. All that can be said is there is
an interest in an ethical subject- but an" indication o# the poet's own %iew is obscured b"
the remo%al o# the poetic %oice #rom the poems. Causing e%en more di##icult" is the #act
that within the #i#th mime the characters #ail to make an" decisi%e statements regarding
the status o# sla%es- or e%en appear to recogni@e that the" are addressing such a weight"
philosophical issue. At least in the mimes dealing with aesthetic criticism Herodas'
characters had %er" pronounced %iews that could be critiued. 1he absence o# well
de#ined ethical %iews makes it di##icult to do an"thing more than simpl" point out the
/96 See ?S /./. Aristotle's ud. th. =./,5/b uses the %erb TR to describe the lo%e between parent andchild. 1here are- o# course- man" e2ceptions to this.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 82/95
76
presence o# ethical topics in the mimes- and note that the characters Herodas emplo"s to
gi%e %oice to ethical statements lack authorit" and appear themsel%es to be unaware that
the" are addressing important issues o# great rele%ance to much o# Hellenistic societ".
#.2.#: Mimiamb 5ne and 'emale 'idelit)
>ne mime in which a clear ethical statement is issued b" a character still #ails to
pro%ide an" hint o# Herodas' own %iews- but is an earl" signal that the mimes will
include ethical judgments. 1he #irst mime #eatures two primar" characters- "llis- an old
procuress- and Metriche- a "ounger woman whose partner has been awa" in Eg"pt #or
ten months. "llis has come to con%ince Metriche that her partner- Mandris- has le#t her
and will not be returning #rom Eg"pt. But no matter- #or "llis has #ound a suitable
companion in lo%e with Metriche and read" to replace Mandris- a "oung- wealth"-
success#ul athlete named r"llos. 1he #irst 88 lines o# the mime are spent on
introductions- #riendl" banter between the two women- and "llis singing the praises o#
r"llos to con%ince Metriche to accept him as a lo%er. 4 will not e2amine these lines in
detail- interesting though the" are- but would instead like to look at Metriche's warning
to "llis immediatel" a#ter the elderl" procuress has urged the "ounger woman to stop
waiting #or her partner and listen to "llis' plea to gi%e her a##ections to the athlete
r"llos `[\FZ^\ W[_- line 88.
Metriche begins her response b" simultaneousl" insulting "llis #or her age and
wits ƒ_\- ^ [_Q ^ U ^G U `VWXfU[ ^ U U U- lines 8=;87.ὰ ὰ ῶ ῶ ἀ ὸ ῦ 1hat this is
intended as a rebuke is clear when Metriche's earlier attitude is taken into account.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 83/95
77
Earl" in the poem she responded to "llis' gloom" comments on old age with what
appears to ha%e been a joke W ^ GU_ QV^VK[f][x NNqὴ ῦ L G- ƒ_\- Q ^TG_Iὰ ἠ
L[U-ἄ lines /=;/7./8 1here is no such pla"#ul attitude later in the poem. Metriche tells
"llis she would not ha%e kindl" endured such words #rom an" other woman ^V ^ Lῦ ἐ -
ZI L_UVQ I Q U ]TRIἐ ἄ ὸ ὐ > ἠ `vQ_Vἐ 4 - lines 86;=. She then issues a
h"pothetical ph"sical threat similar to those seen in Herodas' iambic predecessors-
claiming that she would ha%e taught such a woman to sing a lame song while limping
R U ] [\][U U [`V\][_V- line =/ὴ ἀ > ἐ and to consider her door hate#ul ^ Uὸ
] U FG U L[ FV- line =,.ὐ ὸ ἐ ὸ ἠ ῖ /8/ 1he phrase [\][U R is surel" a re#erence toἀ
Herodas' own choliambic meter- also known as limping iambs- and an earl" signal that
Herodas' poems will be st"led on Hippona2' iamboi . 1his pla"#ul re#erence to the
choliambic meter is especiall" appropriate #or a passage that %er" closel" resembles a
t"pical iambic psogos reminiscent o# Hippona2.
!ollowing her threat- Metriche e2plains more #ull" the reasons #or her anger- and
in doing so indirectl" critici@es the conduct o# others and draws up the Jethical
boundariesO identi#ied b" Acosta;Hughes. She warns "llis ne%er to come back bringing
such a stor" ] V ^I I W[ WZ] UV-ὺ $ ἔ ὲ + \Z- ^ U TG_V G[ W FU- lines =0;=5. ῖ ῦ
She is re#erring here- o# course- to the "oung r"llos' passion #or her and "llis' ad%ice
that she should gi%e up on her current relationship. She then de#ines the proper course
o# action #or a woman whose partner is awa". She tells "llis that she will continue
/81he te2tual corruption here makes it di##icult to understand precisel" what Metriche is sa"ing- but L[U seems to ha%e a se2ual connotation. Cunningham /6=/- ad. loc. citesἄ Anacreont . 9=.,/;, as a
parallel./8/ 1he choice o# the adjecti%e FGIἐ to describe Metriche's home ma" be a re#erence to the tendenc" o#
iambographers to cast the object o# their wrath as an enem". She is #raming her relationship with"llis in traditional iambic terms.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 84/95
78
waiting- and warns "llis against mocking Mandris ^ U |_FTR ] Z^G\ZU Vὴ ὲ ἔ
F`[U ̂ U ]\GUx L G UL[ ̂ I [ I U]GU- lines =8;==.ὸ ὐ ὰ ἐ ) ἰ /8, Here we see a clear
ethical stance taken b" Metriche regarding her #idelit" towards her partner- %oiced in the
traditional #ormat o# an iambic in%ecti%e poem. 4mplicit in Metriche's attack on "llis is
a rejection o# the procuress' own ethical belie#s- which would encourage Metriche to
abandon her partner and trans#er her a##ections elsewhere.
3hile Metriche's statement is clear- it is still impossible to argue #or an" e%idence
o# Herodas' own opinion being suggested b" her words. 1he #irst mime ma"- howe%er-
gi%e some indication to the t"pes o# topics o# interest to Herodas. ?ines ,8;09 #eature a
sort o# encomium o# the attractions o# )tolemaic Eg"pt. 1hough humorousl" placed in
the mouth o# the "llis- it seems likel" that this sort o# comic praise was welcomed b"
the )tolemies./80 1he encomium is worth" o# closer e2amination. "llis praises a great
%ariet" o# institutions and bene#its #or an indi%idual #ound in )tolemaic Eg"pt- notabl"+
power- personal reputation- wealth- se2ual pleasures- the Mouseion- the temple o#
)tolem" 44 )hiladelphus 44 and Arsinoe 44- and the good king again- re#erring to
)hiladelphus. anker- in his discussion o# this passage- notes that "llis' list is arranged
in a Jcomic disorder-O with serious institutions- such as the Mouseion line 0/-
ju2taposed with more #ri%olous pursuits and pleasures such as wine UI- line 0/ and ἶ
/8, 1he %erb L[R reminds me o# the Homeric hero's concern with being laughed at b" his or herenemies. Euripides' Medea pro%ides the clearest e2ample. She e2presses the pain o# hearing herenemies laughing at her se%eral times- such as at =6= when addressing the chorus+ L G L[ FVὐ ὰ )^Z^ U FG U- \V.ὸ ἐ ἐ ῶ *illon /66/- 059 calls tragic laughter Jmale%olent in the e2treme.OMetriche's strong reaction and use o# heroic language is perhaps undercut b" her reconciliation with"llis. !or discussion o# laughter in Homer see ?e%ine /67,- who on p. 6= obser%es that Jlaughtergenerall" implies a real or imagined ph"sical or moral superiorit" o%er another person.O Such laughteris deser%ing o# punishmentD the suitors will ha%e one last laugh at 1elemachus ] GV ̀ U [̂I `" ? ἄ ἐ ?V ^ ] LTVVU WUZ^ G[I-ὐ ῷ @ ὺ ῆ ,/.0=8;== be#ore >d"sseus cuts them down.
/80 See anker ,6 ad. loc. and pp. 0=;07.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 85/95
79
women L_UV Q[I- line 0,. ῖ 1he comic ju2taposition o# the serious and tri%ial in these
lines is consistent with the poetic techniue Herodas emplo"s elsewhere in his poems.
4n the #ourth mime we saw lower class- uneducated women describe works o# art using
the language o# intellectual discourse. ?ikewise- in the %arious mimes discussed abo%e
we ha%e seen %ulgar characters raise uestions and concerns o# serious ethical and
moral importance. 1he tension created b" "llis' deli%erance o# the encomium and the
order o# the attractions is the same tension e%ident throughout the rest o# Herodas'
mimes.
#.#: Conclusion
Besides aiding in creating humor and the ironic tension pre%alent in Herodas'
poetr"- the presence o# the encomium in the #irst poem also signals his connection to
and interest in )tolemaic Eg"ptian culture. 4 would like to de%elop this point b"
suggesting that the ethical issues on which Herodas #ocuses were topics o# great interest
in )tolemaic societ" o# Herodas' da". !eaturing prominentl" in the three mimes
discussed abo%e are primaril" issues dealing with the household and #amil"+ parent;
child relationships are the #ocus o# the third mime- while #idelit" in male;#emale
partnerships is at the #ore#ront o# the #irst mime./85 1he #amil" unit saw changes in the
Hellenistic era in which Herodas wrote and li%ed- so it is uite possible that these mimes
are a reaction to such changes./89 1he #i#th mime #ocuses on the di##icult distinction
/851he third mime also deals with education- another hot topic in )tolemaic Eg"pt. )tolem" 44)hiladelphus passed measures promoting education- while other elites o# the Hellenistic era had ahand in establishing new schools. See Morgan ,/- 9/=.
/89 4t is in )tolemaic Eg"pt that the earliest marriage contracts are #ound. Such contracts deal with a %ariet" o# topics- including dowr"- death- and di%orce. See Yi#tach;!iranko ,0.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 86/95
80
between human and sla%e- and ma" be a reaction to the introduction o# chattel sla%er" to
Eg"pt b" the reeks- which was pre%iousl" uncommon in Eg"pt./88 4 will state one last
time- as 4 ha%e alread" done pre%iousl"- that there is no need to search #or Herodas' own
%iews in his decision to include rele%ant contemporar" issues in his mimes.
4n addition to an" other possible reasons #or including ethical statements- it is
important to keep in mind what ma" well be Herodas' primar" moti%ation+ humor.
3hile 4 ha%e endea%ored to show that the mimes do contain serious moments and ideas-
in the end the" are certainl" meant to be entertaining. )lacing ele%ated statements o# an
ethical nature in the mouths o# characters who occup" the lower ranks o# societ" and
whose morals are- in man" cases- suspect is comical. ># course- just because the
characters are o#ten objects o# ridicule need not mean that their statements are o# less
%alue or that the mimes as a whole are unable to touch on important topics. reek >ld
Comed" was particularl" success#ul in combining %ulgar characters and intellectual
themes- #eaturing characters who crack risue se2ual jokes while probing the
institutions at the core o# Athenian public li#e. 3hile Herodas' poems do not address the
same weight" topics- it ought to be recogni@ed nonetheless that serious ethical concerns
are gi%en pla" in his sketches.
/88See :on <eden ,=- /0/ and *a%ies /675- ,66;0 #or brie# discussion o# chattel sla%er" in)tolemaic Eg"pt.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 87/95
81
Conclusion
1his paper began with an o%er%iew o# the #eatures o# iambic poetr"- #ocusing
particularl" on the ancient iambographer's concern with aesthetic and ethical criticism.
Statements critical o# aesthetic %alues and judgmental o# moral and ethical beha%ior are
recogni@ed as a #eature o# iambic poetr". 4# an author locates himsel#hersel# in the
iambic tradition- then it is highl" likel" that their poetr" will demonstrate this same
#eature. Adopting this simple h"pothesis- 4 ha%e endea%ored to show two things+ #irst-
Herodas consciousl" locates himsel# within the iambic traditionD second- his mimes
demonstrate an important #eature o# iambic poetr" that has o#ten gone unnoticed or
unappreciated- statements o# aesthetic and ethical criticism.
4t is the eighth mime that pro%ides ke" insight into Herodas' %iew o# the new
genre- mimiambos- that he has in%ented. 1he odd #usion o# mimos with iambos e2posed
Herodas and his poems to criticism. 4n response to such critiues he produced and
circulated the eighth mime as a programmatic piece de#ending his new genre while
assigning it a place within the traditional poetic classi#ication scheme. 4n this poem he
appeals jointl" to *ion"sus and Hippona2- the #ormer to lend dramatic gravitas to the
low;brown genre o# mime- and the latter as an iambic authorit" whose own poetr"
pro%ided the model #rom which Herodas would draw the iambic spirit o# his
mimiamboi . B" the end o# the eighth mime Herodas has openl" adopted Hippona2 as
his model- de#ended his poetr" #rom critics- de#ined his new genre using e2isting poetic
classi#ication terms- and ended on an optimistic note predicting #ame and success #or
himsel# and his work. 1he eighth mime is o# the greatest importance #or this paper
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 88/95
82
because it #irml" places Herodas within the iambic tradition.
3ith Herodas' iambic allegiance clearl" shown in the eighth mime- 4 then turned
m" attention to statements o# aesthetic and ethical criticism in his mimes. 4 ha%e argued
that the #ourth mime- #eaturing two women %iewing artwork in a temple- are intended to
ser%e as an Janti;modelO #or the ideal audience o# Herodas' poems- rel"ing on the
parallel between a %iewer o# %isual arts and the readeraudience o# poetr". 4n#used in the
entire #ourth mime are Herodas' own aesthetic %alues and awareness o# his own poetr"
and poetic %oice. $sing the parallel between %isual art and literar" poetr" he teaches his
audience to re#lect acti%el" on his poetr" and to look be"ond the ob%ious realistic
ualities noted b" so man" scholars- and represented b" the #emale %iewers #ocus on the
%ersimilar ualities o# the objects o# %isual art in the #ourth mime. He promotes as an
ideal %iewer one who is mo%ed to contemplation b" art. 4 ha%e argued that Herodas'
interest in aesthetic %alues- particularl" as related to his poetr"- e2tend throughout his
corpus- and ha%e worked to demonstrate that his mimes demonstrate ele%ated concerns
that ha%e recei%ed too little attention.
!rom elements o# aesthetic criticism 4 mo%ed on to ethical criticism- which 4 ha%e
used to re#er to statements judging moral or ethical beha%ior. Such statements are o#ten
placed in the mouths o# characters whose dispositions appear at odd with ele%ated
philosophical and moral concernsD in #act- in most o# the e2amples it appears that the
characters are not consciousl" aware o# the issues the" are raising. >ne o# the greatest
di##iculties in dealing with these ethical statements is understanding Herodas' own %iew.
4 ha%e not attempted to do so- as his %iews are thoroughl" obscured b" the placement o#
such statements in the mouths o# characters who are not part o# the elite- intellectual
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 89/95
83
discourse o# which Herodas and his audience were participants. 4nstead- 4 ha%e
suggested that the ethical and philosophical concerns raised in the mimes correspond
roughl" to broad trends- such as the changing structure o# the #amil"- sweeping the
Hellenistic world at the time o# Herodas' composition o# the mimes. 4 ha%e tried to show
that an interest in ethical issues is- in #act- present in the mimes- as such an interest has
recei%ed little attention.
As the pre%ious concluding paragraphs suggest- one o# the primar" goals o# this
thesis has been to demonstrate that Herodas is %er" much interested in the same elite-
intellectual topics e2plored b" his #ellow Hellenistic poets. His mimes are indeed
humorous- #illed with stock characters and scenes #rom the comic stage- %ulgarit"- and a
biting wit. But the mimiamboi also e2plore topics o# a weight" nature- include
contemporar" aesthetic %alues- the poet's cra#t- the parallels between %isual art and
poetr"- and philosophical and ethical concerns o# interest and immediate rele%ance to
his audience. 1he ideal reader- as established in the #ourth mime- will not sei@e onl" on
the sur#ace ualities so ob%ious to an"one- but will be mo%ed to a deeper contemplation
o# the more subtle elements hidden beneath the sur#ace- and then on to commentar".
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 90/95
84
6orks Cited
Acosta;Hughes- Benjamin. Polyeideia/ the Iambi o+ allimachus and the Archaic
Iambic #radition. Berkele"+ $C )ress- ,,.
Arnott- eo##re". JHerodas and the &itchen Sink.O %reece and !ome /7 /6=/+ /,/;/0,.
Bartsch- Shadi and as Elsner. JEight 3a"s o# ?ooking at an Ekphrasis.O lassical Philology /, ,=+ i;%i.
Bowie- Ewen. JEarl" reek 4ambic )oetr".O Iambic Ideas/ ssays on a Poetic #radition +rom Archaic %reece to the 0ate !oman mpire. Ed. Antonio Aloni- AlessandroBarchiesi- and Alberto Ca%ar@ere. Pew York+ <owman and ?ittle#ield- ,/. /;,7.
Bruss- on. JEpigram.O A ompanion to 'ellenistic 0iterature. Ed. ames Clauss andMartine Cu"pers. Malden- MA+ Blackwell )ublishing- ,/. //=;/09.
Burton- oan. #heocritus1 2rban Mimes/ Mobility, %ender, and Patronage. ?os Angeles+ $C )ress- /669.
Cameron- Alan. allimachus and 'is ritics. )rinceton $)- /669.
Care"- C. JArchilochus and ?"cambes.O lassical 3uarterly 08 /678+ 8;8=.
Cruces- and .C. *aroca. J1he Metre o# Cercidas.O eitschri+t +5r Papyrologie und
pigraphik /, /665+ 7/;65.
Cruisus- >tto. 'erondae Mimiambi . ?eip@ig+ 1eubner- /69.
Cunningham- 4.C. 'erodas Mimiambi . ?eip@ig+ 1eubner- ,5.
;;;. 'erodas Mimiambi . ?ondon+ >2#ord $)- /6=/.
*a%enport- u". #he Mimes o+ 'erondas. San !rancisco+ re" !o2 )ress- /67/.
*a%ies- .&. JCultural- social and economic #eatures o# the Hellenistic world.O #he
ambridge Ancient 'istory. Ed. A.E. Astin- M.3. !rederiksen- <.M. >gil%ie- and!.3. 3albank. Cambridge $)- /675.
*egani- En@o. Studi su Ipponatte. Bari+ Adriatica- /675.
*egani- H. 'ippona( #estimonia et 6ragmenta. ?eip@ig+ 1eubner- /670.
*i regorio- ?amberto. ronda/ Mimiambi 7I8I9:. Milan+ :ita e )ensiero- /66=.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 91/95
85
*illon- Matthew. J1ragic ?aughter.O #he lassical -orld 75 /66/+ 059;099.
*uBois- )age. J<eading the 3riting on the 3all.O lassical Philology /, ,=+ 59;98.
Edmunds- ?owell. JCallimachus 4amb 5+ !rom )er#ormance to 3riting.O Iambic Ideas/ ssays on a Poetic #radition +rom Archaic %reece to the 0ate !oman mpire.Ed. Antonio Aloni- Alessandro Barchiesi- and Alberto Ca%ar@ere. Pew York+<owman and ?ittle#ield- ,/. ==;67.
!innegan- <.. J3omen in Herodian Mime.O 'ermathena /9, /66,+ ,/;0=.
!ord- Andrew. J1he Classical *e#inition o# „…†‡‡.O lassical Philology 70 /677+0;0=.
!ountoulakis- Andreas. JBitinna and the 1"rant+ Some <emarks on Herondas 9.=5;==.O Philologus /9/ ,=+ ,0;,50.
;;;. JHerondas 7.88;=6+ eneric Sel#;Consciousness and Artistic Claims in Herondas'Mimiambs.O Mnemosyne 99 ,,+ 0/;/6.
;;;. J `VG[U^[I in Herondas 7.8/.OA eitschri+t +5r Papyrologie und pigraphik /0/,+ ,=;,7.
!owler- Barbara. #he 'ellenistic Aesthetic. Madison- 34+ $ni%ersit" o# 3isconsin )ress-/676.
el@er- 1. ˆMimus und &unsttheorie bei Herondas- Mimiambus 5.O atalepton/ 6estschri+t +5r Bernhard -yss ;um <= %eburtstag. Ed. C. Sch‰ublin. Basel-/679. 68;//8.
oldhill- Simon. J3hat is Ekphrasis !orO lassical Philology /, ,=+ /;/6.
;;;. J1he Pai%e and &nowing E"e+ Ecphrasis and the Culture o# :iewing in theHellenistic 3orld.O Art and #e(t in Ancient %reek ulture. Ed. S. oldhill and <.>sbourne. Cambridge $)- /665. /6=;,,0.
ra#- !. JEkphrasis+ *ie Entstehung der attung in der Antike.O Beschreibungskunst8 >unstbeschreibung. Ed. . Boehm and H. )#otenhauer. MŠnchen+ 3. !ink- /669.
ut@willer- &athr"n. A %uide to 'ellenistic 0iterature. Malden- MA+ Blackwell)ublishing- ,=.
Hawkins- 1om. J>ut;!o2ing the 3ol#;3alker+ ?"cambes as )er#ormati%e <i%al to Archilochus.O lassical Anti*uity ,= ,7+ 60;//5.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 92/95
86
Headlam- 3alter and A.*. &no2. 'erodas the Mimes and 6ragments. Cambridge$ni%ersit" )ress- /6,,.
Her@og- <. J*er 1raum des Herondas.O Philologus 08 /6,5+ ,=;88.
Hordern- .H. Sophron1s Mimes/ #e(t, #ranslation, and ommentary. ?ondon+ >2#ord$)- ,5.
Hughes- Benjamin. JCallimachus- Hippona2- and the )ersona o# the 4ambographer.O Materiali e discussioni per l1analisi dei testi classici 0= /668+ ,9;,/8.
Hutchinson- .>. 'ellenistic Poetry. >2#ord+ >2#ord $)- /677.
4nwood- Brad and ?.). erson. 'ellenistic Philosophy/ Introductory !eadings.4ndianapolis+ Hackett- /66=.
ones- C.). J1attooing and Branding in raeco;<oman Antiuit".O #he ?ournal o+ !oman Studies == /67=+ /06;/99.
ones- Picholas. !ural Athens 2nder the Democracy. )hiladelphia+ $ni%ersit" o#)enns"l%ania )ress- ,5.
&erkhecker- Arnd. allimachus1 Book o+ Iambi . >2#ord+ >2#ord $)- /666.
&irb"- E.1. Jreece+ 1he !orms o# *ion"sus.O %reek Drama. Ed. Harold Bloom.
Broomall- )A+ Chelsea House )ublishers- ,5. /86;,/.
&irkwood- .M. J1he Authorship o# the Strasbourg Epodes.O #APA 6, /68/+ ,8=;,7,.
&looster- acueline. Poetry as -indo" and Mirror/ Positioning the Poet in 'ellenistic Poetry. ?eiden+ Brill- ,//.
&no2- A.*. J1he *ream o# Herodas.O #he lassical !evie" 06 /6,9+ /0;/9.
&oenderink- . .- A.. %an *oorn- A.M.?. &appers- and .1. 1odd. J)ointing out o# thepicture.O Perception 00 ,5+ 9/0;0.
&onstan- *a%id. J1he 1"rant oddess+ Herodas's !i#th 'Mime'.O lassical Anti*uity 7/676+ ,8=;,7,.
&ut@ko- *a%id. J1he Major 4mportance o# a Minor )oet+ Herodas 8 and = as a {uasi;dramatic *ipt"ch.O Beyond the anon. Ed. M.A. Harder- <. <emco- !. <egtuit-and . C. 3akker. ?eu%en+ )eeters- ,8.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 93/95
87
?ehman- &. J1he irl Beneath the Apple 1ree.O American ?ournal o+ Archaeology 56/659+ 50;500.
?e%ine- *aniel. JHomeric ?aughter and the $nsmiling Suitors.O #he lassical ?ournal=7 /67,+ 6=;/5.
Massa )ositano- ?. roda/ Mimiambo I9. Paples+ ?ibreria Scienti#ica Editrice- /6=0.
Mastromarco- iuseppe. #he Public o+ 'erondas. Amsterdam+ .C. ieben- /675.
Mc*ermott- Emil". uripides1 Medea/ #he Incarnation o+ Disorder. $ni%ersit" )ark-)A+ 1he )enns"l%ania State $)- /676.
Morgan- 1eresa. J thos+ 1he Sociali@ation o# Children in Education and Be"ond.O Aompanion to 6amilies in the %reek and !oman -orlds. Ed. B. <awson. >2#ord+ 3ile";Blackwell- ,/.
Murra"- ackie. Poetically rect/ rinna and &ossis in 'erodas @ and . A)A- ,7-Chicago- 4?. $npublished con#erence abstract. <etrie%ed #rom+http+apaclassics.orgimagesuploadsdocumentsabstractsMurra"(/.pd#
Pairn- .A. #he Mimes o+ 'erodas. ?ondon+ >2#ord $)- /65.
Pappa- Christopher. J1he oat- the out- and the irl+ Catullus 86- =/- and ==.O Mnemosyne 9, /666+ ,88;,=8.
>nians- ohn. Art and #hought in the 'ellenistic Age/ #he %reek -orld 9ie" =8= B.. ?ondon+ 1hames and Hudson- /6=6
)age- *en"s ?. Select Papyri/ 0iterary Papyri/ Poetry. Cambridge- MA+ Heinemann-/65/.
)#ei##er- <. allimachus 6ragmenta. ?ondon+ >2#ord $)- /656.
)isani- :. Jlosse a Eroda.O Paideia = /69,+ 76;65.
)ollitt- .. Art in the 'ellenistic Age. Cambridge $)- /678.
;;;. #he Ancient 9ie" o+ %reek Art/ riticism, 'istory, and #erminology. PewHa%en+ Yale $)- /6=5.
<idgwa"- Brunilde. J1he Bo" Strangling the oose.O American ?ournal o+ Archaeology// ,8+ 850;857.
<ist- Anna. JA !resh ?ook at Herodas' Bucolic Masuerade.O Phoeni( 9/ /66=+ 095;80.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 94/95
88
;;;. J1hat Herodean *ipt"ch Again.O lassical 3uarterly 50 /660+ 55;555.
<osen- <alph. JMi2ing o# enres and ?iterar" )rogram in Herodas 7.O 'arvard Studies
in lassical Philology 65 /66,+ ,9;/8.
;;;. JHippona2- Boupalos- and the Con%entions o# the )sogos.O #APA //7 /677+ ,6;5/.
<otstein- Andrea. #he Idea o+ Iambos. >2#ord+ >2#ord $)- ,/.
Scodel- <uth. J4ambos and )arod".O A ompanion to 'ellenistic 0iterature. Ed. amesClauss and Martine Cu"pers. Malden- MA+ Blackwell )ublishing- ,/. ,9/;88.
Sherwin;3hite- Susan. Ancient os. An historical study +rom the Dorian settlement tothe Imperial period. ‹ttingen+ :andenhoeck Œ <uprecht- /6=7.
Skinner- Maril"n. J?adies' *a" at the Art 4nstitute.O Making Silence Speak/ -omen1s9oices in %reek 0iterature and Society. Ed. Andre ?ardinois and ?aura McClure.)rinceton- P+ )rinceton $)- ,/. ,/;,,,.
Suire- Michael. JMaking M"ron's Cow Moo+ Ecphrastic Epigram and the )oetics o#Simulation.O American ?ournal o+ Philology /0/ ,/+ 976;805.
Stern- acob. JHerodas' Mimiamb 8.O %reek, !oman, and By;antine Studies , /6=6+,5=;95.
:on <eden- Sitta. Money in Ptolemaic gypt . Cambridge $)- ,=.
3ebb- <uth. kphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient !hetorical #heory and Practice. Burlington- :1+ Ashgate )ublishing Compan"- ,6.
;;;. JEkphrasis Ancient and Modern+ 1he 4n%ention o# a enre.O -ord and Image/9 /666+ =;/7.
3ebster- 1homas Bertram. 'ellenistic Poetry and Art . ?ondon+ Methuen- /685.
Yacobi- 1amar. J4nterart Parrati%e+ $n<eliabilit" and Ekphrasis.O Poetics #oday ,/
,+ =//;=56.
Yi#tach;!iranko- $ri. Marriage and Marital Arrangements. A 'istory o+ the %reek Marriage Document in gypt. MŠnchen+ C.H. Beck- ,0.
anker- raham. 'erodas Mimiambs. >2#ord+ >2bow Books- ,6.
;;;. J)oetr" and Art in Herodas- Mimiamb 5.O Beyond the anon. Ed. M.A.
8/13/2019 Aesthetic and Ethical Criticism in Herodas' Mimiamboi
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aesthetic-and-ethical-criticism-in-herodas-mimiamboi 95/95
89
Harder- <. <emco- !. <egtuit- and . C. 3akker. ?eu%en+ )eeters- ,8.
;;;. Modes o+ 9ie"ing in 'ellenistic Poetry and Art . Madison- 34+ $ni%ersit" o#
3isconsin )ress- ,5.