AE Senior Thesis

  • Upload
    miron

  • View
    43

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Advanced Individual Training A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA. AE Senior Thesis. Natalie Bockhorst│Construction Management Chimay Anumba , PhD. PE. Presentation Outline Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Coppin State University

AE Senior Thesis
Natalie BockhorstConstruction ManagementChimay Anumba, PhD. PE
Advanced Individual TrainingA.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA

Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Advanced Individual TrainingA.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA

Advanced Individual TrainingA.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA
A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Project Overview
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements

Project Name:Advanced Individual Training Barracks Location:Building #2301, Marshall St. Fort Eustis, VA Building Occupancy Type:Barracks Number of Stories:3Gross Building Area:91,800 S.F.

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Analysis #1 Short Interval Production Schedule: Masonry Faade Work
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPSProblem Identification DurationsTypical Sequencing SIPSRecommendationArchitectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Problem Identification:

Unforeseen conditionsMortar time consternate concerning precast elements Limited scaffolding


A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Analysis #1 Short Interval Production Schedule: Masonry Faade Work
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPSProblem Identification DurationsTypical Sequencing SIPSRecommendationArchitectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements

Activity Area A (Days)Area B (Days)Area C (Days)Area D (Days) Spray Foam Insulation 1111115Install Brick Veneer 137136Brick Wash 2222Install Precast 6661Total 32223214

Activity Total Duration Unit Unit/Day Spray Foam Insulation 38 Days 36,391sqft960 SF/DayInstall Brick Veneer39 Days173,223 Bricks4500 Bricks/Day or 990 SF/DayInstall Precast 19 Days 297 precast 16 Precast/Day

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Problem Identification DurationsTypical Sequencing SIPSRecommendationArchitectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis #1 Short Interval Production Schedule: Masonry Faade Work

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPSProblem Identification DurationsTypical Sequencing SIPSRecommendationArchitectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis #1 Short Interval Production Schedule: Masonry Faade Work

July 201112345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031Area A South level 1 West level 1 North level 1 Area B North level 1 Area C North level 1East level 1 South level 1 Area B South level 1 Spray FoamInstall Brick VeneerInstall Precast

August 201112345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031Area DEast/ South level 1 West/North level 1 East/South level 2West/Northlevel 2 Spray FoamInstall Brick VeneerInstall Precast

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Problem Identification DurationsTypical Sequencing SIPSRecommendationArchitectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis #1 Short Interval Production Schedule: Masonry Faade Work
It is recommended to use a SIPS for the Masonry Faade Work
Cost Reduction: 1. Labor 2. Equipment

Faade Work Schedule DurationsOriginal TargetActualSIPS120 Days194 Days59 Days

Faade Work Schedule Savings Original TargetActualSIPS38%0%70%

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Architectural Breadth
North Elevation
South Elevation
East Elevation
West Elevation
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Original Brick Veneer ElevationsNew Precast Faade ElevationsComparisonRecommendation Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Original Brick Veneer Elevations
Original Brick Veneer Elevations

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Architectural Breadth
North Elevation
South Elevation
East Elevation
West Elevation
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Original Brick Veneer ElevationsNew Precast Faade ElevationsComparisonRecommendation Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
New Precast Faade Elevations
New Precast Faade Elevations

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Architectural Breadth
North Elevation
South Elevation
North Elevation
South Elevation
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Original Brick Veneer ElevationsNew Precast Faade ElevationsComparisonRecommendation Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
New Precast Faade Elevations
Original Brick Veneer Elevations

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Architectural Breadth
East Elevation
West Elevation
East Elevation
West Elevation
New Precast Faade Elevations
Original Brick Veneer Elevations
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Original Brick Veneer ElevationsNew Precast Faade ElevationsComparisonRecommendation Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Architectural Breadth
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Original Brick Veneer ElevationsNew Precast Faade ElevationsComparisonRecommendation Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
It is recommended to use a Precast Concrete Faade

Faade Cost ComparisonOriginal FaadeNew FaadeUnit Masonry $65.00 Cost/SF Precast Panels $ 50.00 Cost/SFPrecast Concrete $10.00 Cost/SF Total $75.00 Cost/SF Total $ 50.00 Cost/SF

Faade Schedule ComparisonOriginal TargetActualSIPSNew Faade120 Days194 Days59 Days48 Days

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Analysis # 2: Comparing Contracts and Evaluating the Risk
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsProblem Identification Design Build vs. Integrated Project DeliveryRisk Analysis Matrix Recommendations Analysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Problem Identification:

Design Build Contract Approach Industry Issue

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsProblem Identification Design Build vs. Integrated Project DeliveryRisk Analysis Matrix Recommendations Analysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis # 2: Comparing Contracts and Evaluating the Risk

Fundamental PrinciplesIntegrated Project DeliveryDesign Build Project DeliveryMutual respect and trust Mutual respect and trust Mutual risk and rewardCollaborative innovation and decision making Collaborative innovation and decision making Early goal definition Early involvement of all key participantsIntensified Planning Open and enhanced communication

IPDDBProsConsProsConsCollaborative teamX Target cost/value design Speed X Design choices are typically limited Early decision-making X Shared risk, reward, contingency Consolidated cost risk held with the Design Builder X Decision making process is accelerated Dynamic cost modeling X Larger team Owner staffing requirement is reduced Advanced technical coordination Reduce RFIs COs and total cost

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
When evaluating risk, risk can be defined as the likelihood (probability) versus consequences. Setting up the acceptable level of risk in various areas, likelihood of proposed scenarios and acceptability of their consequences can be illustrated in the form of a matrix
High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsProblem Identification Design Build vs. Integrated Project DeliveryRisk Analysis Matrix Recommendations Analysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis # 2: Comparing Contracts and Evaluating the Risk
A141
C195

Risk Analysis Design BuildIntegrated Project DeliveryDescriptionOwner ArchCMSUBOwner ArchCMSUBDelays and Extras InsuranceDispute Resolution Incentive Compensation

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsProblem Identification Design Build vs. Integrated Project DeliveryRisk Analysis Matrix Recommendations Analysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis # 2: Comparing Contracts and Evaluating the Risk
It is not recommended to use an IPD Approach

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Analysis #3 Schedule Acceleration Techniques
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationProblem Identification Flow ChartsLast PlannerRecommendations Analysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Problem Identification:

Unforeseen conditions Site work moved to critical path

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationProblem Identification Flow ChartsLast PlannerRecommendations Analysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis #3 Schedule Acceleration Techniques

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
The process for creating the weekly work plans will be as followed:

Monday Update the project schedule Tuesday Develop the future schedule Wednesday Update the schedule if necessaryThursday Distribute the weekly work plan for the following week to foremen, so they can prepare for the next weeks work
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationProblem Identification Flow ChartsLast PlannerRecommendations Analysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis #3 Schedule Acceleration Techniques

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationProblem Identification Flow ChartsLast PlannerRecommendations Analysis #4: Modularization Final RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis #3 Schedule Acceleration Techniques
It is recommended to use the Last Planner

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: ModularizationProblem Identification Schedule Impact Areas of Modularization Financial Feasibility RecommendationsFinal RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis #4: Analyzing the Effects of Modularization
Problem Identification:

Repetitive and standardized buildingReduce schedule

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: ModularizationProblem Identification Schedule Impact Areas of Modularization Financial Feasibility RecommendationsFinal RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis #4: Analyzing the Effects of Modularization

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Partial First Floor Plan West Wing
Typical Room Enlarged
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: ModularizationProblem Identification Schedule Impact Areas of Modularization Financial Feasibility RecommendationsFinal RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis #4: Analyzing the Effects of Modularization

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Crane Placement and Working Radius Plan
Benefits Controlled factory environment Cost Savings Modular units are built on a flat surface Average 50% schedule savings There is less of a disturbance on siteStandardized design Low waste Environmentally friendly construction process
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: ModularizationProblem Identification Schedule Impact Areas of Modularization Financial Feasibility RecommendationsFinal RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis #4: Analyzing the Effects of Modularization

Cost ComparisonOriginal Cost:$18,618,720Modular Construction Cost:$16,756,848

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Analysis #4: Analyzing the Effects of Modularization
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: ModularizationProblem Identification Schedule Impact Areas of Modularization Financial Feasibility RecommendationsFinal RecommendationsAcknowledgements
It is not recommended to use Modularization
Problems Double WallsContinual Vapor Barrier Installation Insulation Water InfiltrationRoof Logistics

Cost ComparisonOriginal Cost:$18,618,720Modular Construction Cost:$16,756,848

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Final Recommendations
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: ModularizationFinal RecommendationsAcknowledgements
Analysis #1: SIPSSIPS is Recommended

Analysis #2: Contract Comparison IPD is not Recommended

Analysis #3 Schedule Acceleration The Last Planner is Recommended

Analysis #4 Modularization Modularization is not Recommended

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Acknowledgements
Presentation Outline

Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing ContractsAnalysis #3: Schedule AccelerationAnalysis #4: ModularizationFinal RecommendationsAcknowledgements

Friends and Family AE Faculty Advisor: Dr. Anumba Balfour Beatty Construction Project Team U.S. Army Corps Project Team PACE Industry Members

A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA Natalie Bockhorst CM
Questions?

Good Afternoon and Welcome. My name is Natalie Bockhorst and I am a 5th year Construction Management Option. I am here today to present my senior thesis capstone project on the Advanced Individual Training Barracks
*
First I would like to give a presentation outline..
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*