47
ADVANCES IN CORE TECHNOLOGY Julian Lucek New Network Technical Forum, September 2012

ADVANCES IN CORE TECHNOLOGY - … · ADVANCES IN CORE TECHNOLOGY Julian Lucek New Network Technical Forum, ... Labelled BGP (RFC 3107) LSP protection schemes o Primary/Secondary RSVP

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ADVANCES IN CORE TECHNOLOGY

Julian Lucek

New Network Technical Forum, September 2012

2 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

LEGAL STATEMENT

This statement of product direction sets forth Juniper Networks’

current intention and is subject to change at any time without

notice. No purchases are contingent upon Juniper Networks

delivering any feature or functionality depicted in this

presentation.

3 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

AGENDA

Core trends - and associated requirements

PTX - design philosophy and architecture

Optical Integration into routers

Advances in multichassis technology

4 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

Migration to Packet-based Services

Packet Switching (MPLS)

DWDM

Fibre

Vo

IP

Internet

Pri

va

te

Cir

cu

its, A

TM

,

Fra

me

Rela

y

IP V

PN

s

IPT

V/V

oD

TV

Infr

astr

uctu

re

TDM Circuit

Switching

(SONET/SDH or OTN)

PO

TS

(6

4k

cir

cu

its)

SERVICES

INFRA

Mo

bile

vo

ice

Eth

ern

et,

AT

M,

FR

PW

s

TV

Infr

astr

uctu

re

5 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

time

Packet-switched traffic

Circuit-switched traffic

Re

lative

pro

po

rtio

n

MIGRATION FROM ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT SWITCHING TO ELECTRONIC PACKET SWITCHING

Electronic packet switching and

electronic circuit switching are

converging to similar cost

But packet switching is much more

flexible

Network traffic now comes from

computers or computer-like machines

(PCs, web-servers, mobile devices,

games consoles) and they naturally

generate packets.

Even when a customer buys a circuit

service, they are often running packets

over it!

6 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MPLS CORE

Needed:

IPv4, IPv6, MPLS forwarding

Highest possible capacity

High-speed Ethernet ports only (10GE, 40GE, 100GE)

IP Multicast

MPLS Multicast (P2MP LSPs)

Not needed:

Full internet routing table in FIB

Edge services (VPLS, L3VPN, Subs Mgmt..)

7 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

SYSTEM CAPACITY AS FUNCTION OF TIME

time

System

throughput

(log scale) General purpose

core/edge router

Streamlined core

router

8 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

PTX5000: SHIPPING SINCE MARCH 2012

PTX 5000

17.6’’ (19’’ rack) x 33’’x62, (WxDxH)

Max power consumption: 11kW

Typical power consumption: 6.2kW

8 line card slots, 2 PICs per slot

10GE: 384

40GE: 32

100GE: 32

Port counts (line-rate, full-duplex)

•Highest capacity in the entire industry

•Junos operating system

•Very low latency: ~7 microseconds for 512 byte packet on 10GE link

•Record low Energy Consumption Ratio (ECR) of 1.54 Gbps/W

9 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

PTX FPC & FABRIC OVERVIEW

PFE based on next generation of Juniper’s silicon technology 4 PFE complexes per LC

Fabric chip resides on the SIB.

FPC and SIBs connected orthogonally on the mid plane

9 SIBs in both the 8 slot and 16 slot chassis.

Single stage fabric for both 8 and 16 slot single chassis PTX

All 9 SIBs are active. PFEs spray across all 9 SIBs Only 8 SIBs needed to sustain line rate

traffic.

The 9th SIB being active all the time allows for fast SIB failover since all SIB to PFE links are active.

SIB0

SIB8

Lookup chip

Queuing chip

120 Gbps PFE

complex

FPC

10 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

PTX KEY FUNCTIONALITY

IGP protocols, including TE extensions: ISIS, OSPF

MPLS protocols: o RSVP TE, LDP

o LSP Hierarchy: LDP over RSVP, RSVP over RSVP, Labelled BGP (RFC 3107)

LSP protection schemes o Primary/Secondary RSVP LSP

o RSVP Fast-Reroute (1:1 protection, link protection, node protection). FRR for 50000 LSPs takes less than 20ms.

o IP Fast Reroute (Loop-Free Alternates) for OSPF, ISIS (+ LDP)

11 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

PTX KEY FUNCTIONALITY

MPLS Multicast: o RSVP P2MP, LDP P2MP

IP Multicast: PIM

BGP (but not full internet table in FIB)

Route Reflector support for all BGP address families

Seamless MPLS Border Node; Interprovider Option B and C

12 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

PTX KEY FUNCTIONALITY

BFD, including BFD over MPLS LSPs

LSP ping and traceroute

Ethernet OAM (802.1ag and 802.3ah)

PE for Point-to-point pseudowires: LDP signalling (L2circuit), BGP signalling (L2VPN) VCCV and VCCV-BFD

Firewall Filters and Policers Including Two-Rate Tricolour Marking, Single-Rate Tricolour marking

ECMP over 64 paths

LAG with 64 child links

Synchronous Ethernet

13 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

QUEUEING AND SCHEDULING

BA and MF Classifiers

Port based queuing - 8 queues per port

Four levels of scheduling priority

o Strict-high

o High

o Medium

o Low

Four drop priorities per queue

Full delay-bandwidth buffering on all ports (100 ms)

Scheduling

14 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

THROUGHPUT CHART (IPV4)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100 6

4

67

70

73

76

79

82

85

88

91

94

97

10

0

10

3

10

6

10

9

11

2

11

5

11

8

12

1

12

4

12

7

25

6

16

64

20

48

24

32

28

16

32

00

35

84

39

68

43

52

47

36

51

20

55

04

58

88

62

72

66

56

70

40

74

24

78

08

81

92

85

76

89

60

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (%

)

Packet size (bytes)

15 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

THROUGHPUT CHART (IPV6)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

78

81

84

87

90

93

96

99

10

2

10

5

10

8

11

1

11

4

11

7

12

0

12

3

12

6

19

6

15

00

19

20

23

04

26

88

30

72

34

56

38

40

42

24

46

08

49

92

53

76

57

60

61

44

65

28

69

12

72

96

76

80

80

64

84

48

88

32

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (%

)

Packet size (bytes)

16 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

THROUGHPUT CHART (MPLS)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100 6

4

67

70

73

76

79

82

85

88

91

94

97

10

0

10

3

10

6

10

9

11

2

11

5

11

8

12

1

12

4

12

7

25

6

16

64

20

48

24

32

28

16

32

00

35

84

39

68

43

52

47

36

51

20

55

04

58

88

62

72

66

56

70

40

74

24

78

08

81

92

85

76

89

60

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (%

)

Packet size (bytes)

17 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

PTX CUSTOMER ANNOUNCEMENTS

London Internet Exchange (LINX) https://www.linx.net/publicity/2011releases/pr2011-01.html

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog54/presentations/Wednesday/Cobb.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8WrVakhPwI&featu

Verizon http://newscenter.verizon.com/press-releases/verizon/2012/verizon-to-

deploy-the.html

“Verizon plans to deploy the Juniper Networks® PTX Series in major markets in the U.S. and Europe by the end of this year, giving the company the densest multiprotocol label switching platform available in the industry, with an initial capacity of eight terabits per second”

18 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

TREND: CONSOLIDATION OF PACKET NETWORKS

Some operators have ended up having multiple packet networks for

different purposes, for example:

Separate Public IP and Private IP networks

Or separate Business and Residential networks

Or separate L3 networks and L2 networks

However, this is inefficient for both CAPEX and OPEX reasons, and

reduces one of the key benefits of packet networks: efficient bandwidth

utilisation through packet aggregation, statistical multiplexing.

Hence there is now a strong trend to consolidate these separate

networks.

19 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

TREND: CONSOLIDATION OF THE PACKET NETWORKS (CONT’D)

Also the traffic patterns are complementary:

Business Services (e.g. L3VPN, Layer 2 services) peak during

the day

Residential peaks during the evening

Packet schedulers/queues give segregation between

different services, while still allowing them to use each

other’s spare bandwidth, on a millisecond by millisecond

basis

20 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

Separate packet networks for different services?

Wasteful duplication of resources, some opportunity for bandwidth sharing is missed!

P-router

P-router

P-router

P-router

PE

PE

PE

PE

business residential

21 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

Common core, separate PEs for different services

Common core network –

benefit from more efficient

bandwidth

utilisation/sharing.

P-router

P-router

PE

PE

PE

PE

business residential

Such merger project is already in progress, using PTX as the P-router

22 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

Common core, common PEs (MultiService Edge)

P-router

P-router

PE

PE

PE

PE

All services All services

23 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

SOME PTX FAQS

1/ Can PTX be used as a Route Reflector (RR)?

Yes, PTX has full Junos control plane functionality. Uses the same RE

as the TX Matrix Plus SFC. This RE can hold millions of prefixes in the

RIB. Can act as RR for all BGP address families, even ones that are

not supported in the FIB (e.g. BGP-VPLS).

2/ Can PTX forward IP packets, as well as MPLS packets?

Yes, at wire-speed! Note that the FIB currently supports ~48k longest

matching IP prefixes, so not the full internet table.

OPTICAL INTEGRATION

25 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

OPTIMUM CORE ARCHITECTURE

Only one network layer needed–the

packet layer

Core routers interconnected by DWDM

point-to-point links

Protection based on IP/MPLS schemes

This architecture has been used for many

years in many networks, and works very

well

Let’s see how the way the router is

connected to the DWDM system can be

improved..

26 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

Grey interfaces versus Coloured interfaces

No transponder on DWDM system!

Coloured, tunable 100 GE interface on the router.

Long-haul coloured optics

Transponder

on DWDM

system

Transponder

on DWDM

system

CFP grey optics CFP grey optics

Router Router

Router Router

27 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

INTEGRATION=SIMPLIFICATION: ANALOGIES FROM THE PAST

1/ In the early days, when connecting a router to a PDH link, needed an external CSU/DSU.

Later, the CSU/DSU function was built into the router port, eliminating the need for a separate CSU/DSU unit.

2/ Early dial-up modems were separate units. Later, these were integrated onto PCI cards and later still onto PC motherboards.

v

v

28 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

MONITORING THE PRE-FEC BER

FEC

Pre-FEC BER rate status: OK

Pre-FEC Post-FEC

Errored

bits

29 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

MONITORING THE PRE-FEC BER (CONT’D)

FEC

Pre-FEC BER rate status: signal degrade.

=> Link down and FRR triggered before packets are lost.

Pre-FEC Post-FEC

Errored

bits

30 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

COHERENT DETECTION

00

01 10

11

Above diagram is for one polarisation. Using the orthogonal polarisation in addition,

carry 4 bits per symbol in total (DP-QPSK)

•Very resilient to

chromatic dispersion (CD)

and polarisation mode

dispersion (PMD)!

•Removes need for in-line

CD and PMD

compensators

•Good spectral efficiency

(2 bps/Hz)

31 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

Traditional DWDM system (e.g. as deployed for N x 10G/40G)

•In-line compensators for Chromatic Dispersion (CD) – analogue optical devices

•System is labour-intensive to design and turn-up (“hand-crafted”)

•Undesirable dependencies between line-system characteristics and transmitter/receiver characteristics on

overall system performance

Amp Amp Amp

DWDM system with coherent detection + electronic post-processing

(as being deployed for N x 100G)

•No in-line compensators needed – compensation/signal processing all happens fully automatically in

the electronic domain (DSP on ASIC) at the receivers

•Much more “plug-and-play” in nature

Amp Amp Amp

CD

comp. CD

comp.

32 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

BEFORE COHERENT

“Optical Performance” e.g. maximum distance.

Before coherent, optical performance parameters were a competitive benchmark

between vendors.

Vendor W Vendor X Vendor Y Vendor Z

Optical Performance

33 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

WITH COHERENT

Vendor W Vendor X Vendor Y Vendor Z

Optical Performance

No performance difference between different vendors: deterministic

digital processing replaces highly-tuned analogue processing

34 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

OTS-1000 DWDM SYSTEM

Complements coloured 100G interfaces on router

Supports 96 wavelengths @ 100G

System reach of 2500km

Flexible bandwidth allocation for future modulation

formats

High performance optical amplification

Integrated hybrid EDFA + Raman for various fiber types

Extended C band support

Low noise figure & high flatness

No dispersion compensation module needed

35 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

BLACK LINK SCHEMATIC

36 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

ITU-T: BLACK LINKS

Black Links initiative in ITU-T G.698.2 (11/2009)

“Common equipment” (multiplexers, amplifiers, ROADMs etc) from one vendor

Sources and receivers from other vendor(s), for example on routers

Associated management framework/MIBs being defined in IETF

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kunze-g-698-2-management-control-framework-02

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib-00

MIB contains source and receiver characteristics, alarms and PM information

We will follow this approach

Coloured interfaces on router connected to OTS-1000

Coloured interfaces on router connected to another vendor’s DWDM system

37 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

VIRTUAL TRANSPONDER MODEL USING BLACK LINKS

Router DWDM

MUX

100G

DWDM LINK

100G

100G 100G

100G 100G

100G 100G

DWDM

MUX Router

Black Links MIB allows routers to expose Performance Monitoring

information and Alarms to the NMS.

Juniper or 3rd Party Line System

Management

System

ADVANCES IN

MULTICHASSIS

TECHNOLOGY

39 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

MULTICHASSIS TECHNOLOGY

T1600 TXP SFC T4000

T1600 T4000

T1600 T4000

T1600 T4000

We are pioneers in

multichassis technology,

since the TX Matrix in

2004.

2011 was a record year

for multichassis T-series

shipments.

20% of deployed T-series

chassis are part of a

multichassis system.

40 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

WHY MULTICHASSIS

Non- multichassis capable platform

System capacity is challenged to keep

pace with traffic growth

Create periods of uncertainty

Forces early adoption of higher capacity

line cards

Though the systems might support a

higher capacity with new line

cards/fabric upgrade, slots may not be

available to do the same

Forced upgrade of line cards – reduces

the lifespan of line cards

Increases CAPEX over a period time

Time

Ba

nd

wid

th

Slots filled

Requirement

vs. capacity

gap

System

capacity

growth (Single Chassis)

Multichassis Capacity

41 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

SOME FACTS ABOUT MULTICHASSIS

From the day-to-day operational point of view, not very different to a

single chassis

The system is a single node from the routing protocol point of view

Central “brain” (the RE in the central chassis)

Single point of management

Single config file, just like for a standalone chassis

Seamless slot numbering in config (e.g. “slot 10” rather than

“chassis 2, slot 3”)

When using link aggregation (LAG), member links can be on

different chassis

42 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

MULTICHASSIS TECHNOLOGY

T1600 TXP SFC T4000

T1600 T4000

T1600 T4000

T1600 T4000

Next version of T-Series

Multichassis is about to beta

(Q4 2012).

• 4 x T4000

• Or 8 x T1600

• Or a mixture of T4000 and

T1600

We will also have multichassis

PTX in future.

43 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

MULTICHASSIS INTERCONNECTS

In all of our multichassis systems, the interconnects

between the chassis are optical

Not possible to have electrical interconnects at these

high data rates over tens of metres

But people have found optical interconnections to be

inconvenient, because of having to clean/inspect large

numbers of optical connectors at installation time

Is there a way of having optical cables, but with the

zero-maintenance attributes of an electrical cable?

44 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

MULTICHASSIS INTERCONNECT

CXP Active Optical Cable CXP optical module is permanently

sealed onto the optical cable in the

factory.

No dust or grease can get onto the

optics.

As easy as plugging in an Ethernet

CAT5 cable.

40 cables between each T4000 LCC

and the SFC.

Note: we will also supply separate CXP modules and cables if preferred to AOC.

45 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

CXP INTERCONNECT

Each CXP cable consists of 24 “lanes” (fibres), 12 in each direction.

We have per-lane power monitoring/reporting.

Spare lane not needed for data used to carry an internal identifier, in

order to detect mis-cabling

Optional mode to make it easier to plug cables into correct sockets on

LCC and SFC.

Red LEDs flash on first pair of ports to be connected.

When they are connected, the LEDs stop flashing. The LEDs from the next

pair of ports start flashing and so on.

46 Copyright © 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net

SUMMARY

Advent of PTX: streamlined router for the core.

Highest capacity in the industry

Junos Operating System - extensive protocol and feature support

Optical Integration

commoditisation of optical transmission

Integration of long-haul transponders into the router.

Next generation of multichassis technology