Advanced Nuclear Technology (ANT) Program€¦ · Reports to the Nuclear Power Council Provides recommendations concerning the annual work scope and budget Provides input on issues,

© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Ron Jones, ANT APC ChairpersonRon King, EPRI Program Manager

Nuclear Power Council Advisory MeetingNew Orleans, LA

Tuesday AM, August 30, 2016

Advanced Nuclear Technology (ANT) Program

Action Plan Committee (APC) Meeting

Revision: August 22, 2016

2© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

First Things First

WelcomeGetting ConnectedLegaleseHotel LogisticsSafety IntroductionsAgendaProgram Overview


Welcome to the EPRI Advanced Nuclear Technology APC


Get Connected…


Antitrust Guidelines for EPRI Meetings and ConferencesThe antitrust laws and other business laws apply to EPRI, its Members, participants, funders, and advisers; violations can lead to civil and criminal liability. EPRI is committed to both full compliance and maintaining the highest ethical standards in all of our operations and activities.These guidelines apply to all occasions: before, during, and after EPRI meetings, including in the hallways, over lunch, during breaks and at dinner.

…is to conduct research and development relating to the generation, delivery and use of electricity for the benefit of the public. EPRI advisory meetings are conducted to further that purpose.

…is to follow the meeting agenda and provide advice on EPRI’s R&D program and how to make EPRI results most useful. Consult with your company counsel if at any time you believe discussions are touching on sensitive antitrust subjects such as pricing, bids, allocation of customers or territories, boycotts, tying arrangements and the like.

EPRI’S PRIMARY PURPOSE

YOUR ROLE AT EPRI ADVISORY MEETINGS


Antitrust Guidelines for EPRI Meetings and Conferences (continued)

…pricing, production capacity, or cost information which is not publicly available; confidential market strategies or business plans; or other competitively sensitive information. Do not disparage suppliers and/or competitors of EPRI, technology providers and/or EPRI Members and participants.

…the use of particular vendors, contractors or consultants for non-EPRI projects. EPRI will not promote or endorse commercial products or services of third parties. You must draw your own conclusions and make your own choices independently.

…in any discussions of goods and services offered in the market by others, including your competitors, suppliers, and customers.

DO NOT DISCUSS

EPRI DOES NOT RECOMMEND

BE ACCURATE, OBJECTIVE, AND FACTUAL


Antitrust Guidelines for EPRI Meetings and Conferences (continued)

…to discriminate against or refuse to deal with (i.e., “boycott”) a supplier; or to do business only on certain terms and conditions; or to set price, divide markets, or allocate customers.

…or advise others on their business decisions, and do not discuss yours (except to the extent that they are already public).

…for advice from your own legal department, if you have questions about any aspect of these guidelines or about a particular situation or activity at EPRI; or ask the responsible EPRI manager to contact EPRI’s Legal Department.

DO NOT AGREE WITH OTHERS

DO NOT TRY TO INFLUENCE

ASK


Emergency Exits: Chamber Rms. 1- 4 (Mayor’s Suite Level)

NOTE: ALLRED DOORSARE EMERGENCY EXIT DOORS

CHAMBERS 1-4

ANT

Today


Emergency Exits: Roosevelt BR (Mezzanine Level)

NOTE: ALLRED DOORSARE EMERGENCY EXIT DOORS

ROOSEVELT BALLROOM

ANT

Tomorrow


Safety


Introductions


TUESDAY, AUGUST 30

TIME TOPIC PRESENTER

8:00 am Introduction / Meeting Objectives / ANT Status Ron King / Ron Jones8:45 am EPC TAC: Final Roadmaps and 2017 & 2018 Projects David Scott9:30 am MTA TAC: Final Roadmaps and 2017 & 2018 Projects Matt O’Connor10:15 am Break10:45 am M&C TAC: Final Roadmaps and 2017 & 2018 Projects Craig Stover11:30 am Member Survey All12:00 pm Lunch – Crescent City Ballroom (Mezzanine Level)1:00 pm Member Status of New Build Projects Members1:30 pm Update on Advanced Manufacturing Program Craig Stover, Dave Gandy2:00 pm Update on Advanced Reactor Program Andrew Sowder2:30 pm Break All3:00 pm Financial Review Ron King3:30 pm Group Discussion: 2017 & 2018 Project Plan, Multiyear Plan All4:15 pm Upcoming Meetings and Schedule All4:30 pm Adjourn


WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 31


8:00 am Morning Introduction Ron Jones / Ron King8:10 am Review Completed and Selected Projects ‐ EPC David Scott, Ron King9:00 am Review Completed and Selected Projects ‐ MTA Matt O’Connor, Ron King9:30 am Break10:00 am Review Completed and Selected Projects – M&C Craig Stover, Matt O’Connor11:30 am Review Undiscussed Deliverables EPRI ANT Staff11:45 am Action Items All12:00 pm Adjourn: Lunch – Crescent City Ballroom (Mezzanine Level)


ANT Program MissionThe EPRI Advanced Nuclear Technology (ANT) Program leads

Research and Development (R&D) through EPRI’s collaborative model to proactively evaluate and address issues regarding the near-term

deployment of advanced light water reactors.

The ANT Program is a scientific research program for those around the world and at various stages of new nuclear plant development and

deployment, concentrating on the economic, technical, regulatory, and social issues that could affect the ability to license, construct, start-up, and

operate advanced light water reactors.


ANT Cockpit


Project Status Updates


Project Overview Forms


ANT Advisory Structure

Advanced Reactor TAG

(Andrew Sowder)

APC

IC

Engineering, Procurement & Construction TAC

(David Scott)

TAGs

Materials and Components TAC(Craig Stover)

TAGs

Modern Technology Application TAC

(Matt O’Connor)

TAGs

‒ Chair: Ron Jones (SCANA)‒ Vice Chair: Open

•ANT Technical Staff‒ Ron King (Program Manager)‒ Matt O’Connor‒ David Scott‒ Christian Marciulescu

‒ Andrew Sowder‒ Craig Stover‒ Robin Thompson‒ Matrix Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)


Action Plan Committee (APC)

The APC advises on the strategic direction of the ANT Program:

Highest-level committee in the ANT Program structure Reports to the Nuclear Power Council Provides recommendations concerning the annual work scope and budget Provides input on issues, needs, or potential projects The APC chair leads in-person meetings and represents the program on the Nuclear Power

Council Executive Committee

Open


Integration Committee (IC)The IC advises on the technical work scope of the program:

Reports to the APC Development of the work scope, and early prioritization for projects Combines the project input from the Technical Advisory Committees into a candidate portfolio

ready for prioritization Brings forward projects in areas not covered by the Technical Advisory Committees

Open


Technical Advisory Committees (TACs) The ANT Program maintains three TACs, one for each Technical Focus Area:

– Engineering, Procurement, and Construction– Materials and Components– Modern Technology Application

Each TAC is responsible for:– Developing a multiyear roadmap for the issues and R&D needed – Developing prioritized projects based on the roadmap for the ANT Program’s annual

portfolio, with a target of having a two-year project plan– Bringing prioritized project sets forward to the IC for overall prioritization

David Scott Craig Stover Matt O’Connor


Technical Advisory Groups

The ANT Program may establish TAGs as necessary to address specific issues:

TAGs are created as needed to maximize the collaboration for an individual project Participants provide input and advice to the EPRI project manager Review and comment on documents and other deliverables as they are developed


Structure of APC meetings

Winter APC– Quick review on all approved POFs– Presentation on active projects identified by PM significant success, funding requests, changes, etc.

– All completed projects & deliverables

Summer APC– Proposed projects portfolio (POFs) – review & prioritization– Additional updates & strategic planning– Presentation on selected active projects identified by IC or by PM significant success, funding requests, changes, etc.


January February March April May June July August September October November December

Winter APC Meeting Summer APC MeetingFebruary 9 – 10, Austin, TX @ NPC

Finalize Budget for Current YearReview status of ongoing R&D

August 30 – 31, New Orleans, LA @ NPCReview New Projects for Next Year

Set priority list for next year

Monthly Updates Mid-Year Webcast End-of-Year WebcastFirst Week of Each MonthReview past and upcoming activitiesRelevant project status updates

June 8, 2016, 9AM EDTProgram Review

December 7, 2016, 9AM ESTProgram Review

Action Plan Committee (APC) – Program Review and Advisory

Technical Advisory Committees (TACs) and Integration Committee (IC) – Portfolio Development

Feb. TAC Webcasts

April TACWebcasts

June TAC Webcasts

Oct. TAC Webcasts

Week ofFeb. 28, 2016

Week ofApr. 10, 2016

Week ofJun. 19, 2016

Week ofOct. 16, 2016

March TAC / IC May TAC / IC July ICMar. 16 (TACs) & 17 (½ day IC)

Charlotte, NCContinue Roadmap Development

Start 2017 & 2018 planning

May 11 (TACs) & 12 (½ day IC)Charlotte, NC

Continue Roadmap DevelopmentReview potential 2017 & 2018 projects

July 27 & 28 (1½ day IC only)Charlotte, NCFinalize Roadmap DevelopmentFinalize 2017 & 2018 portfolio for prioritization

2016 ANT Operational Calendar


February APC Action Item UpdateAction Item #

Description Estimated Completion

1Project 2015‐02, Ensure the results of the Technology for SMR Staff Optimization project are used as a feeder for MTA projects

Complete

2Project 2015‐02, Ensure the results of the Technology for SMR Staff Optimization project are provided to the ‘Delivering the Nuclear Promise’ teams

Complete

3Projects and Roadmaps, investigate the linkage and display of funding to the individual roadmaps and potential projects

Roadmaps likely public

4 Projects and Roadmaps, if applicable, note a project’s applicability to the ‘Nuclear Promise’Relevant issues

addressed in POFs

5 Project 2016‐05, Matt O’Connor to contact Dan Stout regarding the secure networking TI project Complete

6Project 2016‐A, elevate the priority of the Rebar Initiatives project one spot above additive manufacturing

Complete

7Project 2010‐01, Craig Stover to follow up with Tom McCallum and Bill Maher on how the standards work, how limited data can be used; and to provide more clarity on the overall project

Complete

8Project 2015‐07, Matt O’Connor to check on any ASME code issues regarding NDE inspection requirements and the Pre‐Filming SG Tube project

Complete


ANT – Looking Forward

Ensure Sustainable Engagement– Keep who we have and bring in others with active projects or pursuits, for long term

relationships– Provide value for varied and global stakeholders– Maximize relevance for stakeholders at different states of process– Ensure funding model reflects current industry situation

Increase Leadership Role– Increase presence and impact with selected industry groups– Increase leadership role in mapping and leading industry issues– Enlist the APC for help


ANT – Looking Forward

Increase Strategic Planning– Improve our multiyear planning and develop processes to support– Focus direction to maximize impact, choose issues and areas where we can provide

maximum value– Adjust to changing industry needs (ex. globalization, SMRs, increasing awareness of

advanced reactors)– Use strategic planning to lead project development and selection

Simplification– Update processes to maximize R&D value, while continuing best practices– Better align with the nuclear sector operational plan


APC Advisor Role

Roles and Responsibilities – Be an industry advocate, ensure alignment of research with industry needs– Maintain balance between tactical and strategic needs– Drive focus on issues with value across nuclear plant designs and

geographical boundaries– Help us prioritize activities based on importance and timeliness

•To Do– Actively participate in key meetings and webcasts– Download pertinent results and incorporate into your practices– Visit the ANT Program Cockpit on the EPRI Member Center website– Share ideas and experiences


Guidelines for Next Two Days

Understand applicability of projects for your company

Engage with the EPRI staff and your colleagues

Provide candid and constructive feedback

Ask questions


Advanced Nuclear Technology Program

Strategy and Operations 3 New Technical Focus Areas

– Engineering, Procurement, and Construction– Materials and Components– Modern Technology Application

3 New Technical Advisory Committees (TACs)– One each for the 3 technical areas above– Changes to IC Process to include TACs

Process Changes– Project prioritization– Ranking processes– New Forms– Advisory roles & responsibilities

Focus

Planning

Alignment

Refer to Advanced Nuclear Technology: Strategy and Operations, Rev. 0, October 6, 2014


TAC Responsibilities

Developing a multiyear roadmap for the issues and R&D needed in that technical area

Developing prioritized projects based on the roadmap for the ANT program’s annual portfolio, with a target of having a two-year project plan


Integration Committee (IC) Role

Provide advice, synthesis, and prioritization on input from the TACs for a portfolio of high value candidate projects

Brings forward projects in areas not covered by the TACs

Ensures we have a balanced portfolio to cover all three technical focus areas

Manage the prioritization process for their company


Overall Goals

TAC Goals– Develop multi-year roadmaps of issues and opportunities– Use the roadmaps to develop a 2-year plan by summer of 2016

IC Goal – Present a proposed 2-year portfolio for prioritization in the summer of 2016

APC Goal– Have 2-year project portfolio planned for 2017 and 2018 by the end of the

August APC in 2016


Early Actions Develop a short charter for the TAC – By February 2015

– Refine ‘the box’ of the technical area

Develop sets of Issues and Opportunities – By March 2015– Do not develop projects yet– Make sure they fit the charter

Begin Roadmap Development – Draft by May 2015– First draft of roadmaps– What, Why, How, End Goal, Who, Schedule

APC endorses plans to date, including Roadmaps and Research Focus Areas– This past February

2016 Project Developm

ent


Next Actions Solidify current state of roadmaps (all but multi-year planning)

– Updated in October TAC Webcasts, Finals Provided to APC

Continue multi-year planning– Started with October TAC Webcasts– Review with APC at Winter Advisory Meetings (here and now)– Continue with February 2016 TAC Webcasts

Begin definition of 2017 and 2018 projects, and firm up multiyear plan– March TAC & IC Meeting

Refine 2017 (more detail) and 2018 (less detail) projects and review multiyear plan– May TAC & IC Meeting

Review final 2017 & 2018 projects for prioritization, endorse roadmaps for APC– July IC Meeting

Prioritization– July/August

APC review and endorse 2017 and 2018 portfolios and finalized roadmaps– Summer Advisory Meetings


New Prioritization Process for 2017+ EPRI Nuclear Sector Wide Process

– All programs will have a 2-year portfolio moving forward– Must have 2017 & 2018 portfolio ready and prioritized by August 2016

Updated Planning Process– TACs will develop roadmaps, multiyear plan, and a 2-year project plan– Projects assigned to Research Focus Areas (RFAs) in the TAC roadmaps– Project Opportunity Forms (POFs) created for potential 2017 & 2018 projects– IC will advise the process for a high value, balanced portfolio

Portfolio Ranking and Comments by Funders– POFs provided to members (via the IC) for ranking using an on-line tool– Comments will be collected for each project– Ranking will be 1 (higher) through 3 (lower)– Only RFAs will be ranked

ANT Staff Will:– collect, consolidate, and review comments and prioritization – evaluate against the roadmap plans and resource availability– develop a proposed 2017 & 2018 portfolio for APC’s review and consideration in August


TUESDAY, AUGUST 30




Proposed 2017 – 2018 Projects - EPC

Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC)

EPC RFA #1: Increase Efficiency and Reduce Cost of New Nuclear Construction

EPC 2017-C Investigating Mechanical Splicing of Reinforcing Steel

EPC 2017-D Optimization of Concrete Placements

EPC 2017-E Feasibility Study of Using Existing Software for Flow Simulation of SCC

EPC 2018-B Field Guide for Reinforcing Steel Inspections

EPC 2018-C Image Processing for Data Development of Construction As-Builts and Inspection

EPC RFA #2: Development of Collaborative Engineering, Design Tools, and Processes

EPC 2017-A Vertical Response Motion Computation in SSI Analysis of Embedded Structures

EPC 2017-B Ground Motion Kappa Parameter Reassessment

EPC 2018-A Alternative Methods and Materials to Reinforce Concrete

EPC RFA #3: Improve Quality of Supply Chain for Nuclear

N/A No projects for prioritization


EPC TAC Charter and RFAsThe Engineering, Procurement, and Construction technical area covers R&D that primarily addresses collaborative engineering and design tools, procurement quality, and construction materials & construction activities, primarily related to the physical plant. Special focus will be given to issues that reduce cost, improve efficiency, and increase quality making new nuclear more competitive with other energy options.

Three Research Focus Areas have been identified by the TAC:– Increase Efficiency and Reduce Cost of New Nuclear Construction– Development of Collaborative Engineering, Design Tools, and Processes– Improve Quality of Supply Chain for Nuclear


EPC RFA – Increase Efficiency and Reduce Cost of Construction

Drivers: Nuclear power plants have – High capital costs for construction– Cost and schedule overruns are common– Cost uncertainty for new builds

Opportunities: – New and refined materials, components, and processes are

available and proven in other industries– Risk reduction through efficiencies and associated cost reductions – Understanding and sharing of common issues and, more

importantly, their resolutions Scope:

– Benchmark and deploy new and improved materials and processes– Catalogue issues and root causes found globally

Priorities:– Modern materials, tools, and methods– Address and improve new techniques– Benchmarking and lessons learned


EPC 2017-C Investigating Mechanical Splicing of Reinforcing Steel

Issue:

• Rebar splicing methods typically used in construction are costly and increase steel congestion

• Use of mechanical couplers is limited• Alternative mechanical couplers have been observed in other parts of world

Scope:

• Investigate application of epoxy-injected mechanical rebar coupler used in Japan NPP construction and other technology such as the Lenton Lock from Erico

• Interface with vendors, utilities, and TAGs to learn what existing techniques are being utilized and determine the benefits/limitation of those techniques

• Generate list of recommended technologies and outline technical hurdles if acceptance by ACI, ASME, and other impacted codes and standards are limited

Value:

• Improved schedule and cost of construction using quick connect to eliminate threading rebar and remove torque requirements with a smaller connectors

• Alternative design opportunities• Improved quality of reinforced concrete

Originally a part of Rebar Initiative with the Field Guide project.


EPC 2017-D Optimization of Concrete Placements

Issue:

• Concrete placements for NPP construction are often limited for multiple reasons – batch plant capacity, pump availability, inspections, pour heights/pressures, temperature requirements

• Limitations on placement size result in schedule delays due to slower and smaller placements; subsequently, there are increased costs and deceleration of construction

• Improved batching, inspection, and placement practices at NPPs are achievable

Scope:

• This project will investigate the concrete life cycle – mixture design, batching, delivery, and formwork requirements – at nuclear power sites

• Identify inefficiencies of concrete placement through research and interfacing with sites• Review opportunities to optimize concrete placement process by identifying barriers that limit size

and quantity of single concrete placements• Identify additional, more innovative methods to place concrete (e.g. 3D Printing)

Value:

• Reduced concrete construction risks• Faster, more-efficient concrete placements• Reduced construction schedule and thereby increasing cost savings• Opportunity to accelerate construction schedule if other delays occur


EPC 2017-E Feasibility Study of Using Existing Software for Flow Simulation of Self-Consolidating Concrete

Issue:

• EPRI is currently studying the use of self-consolidating concrete for nuclear power plants (NPPs).• Self-consolidating concrete is being utilized in construction at various NPPs throughout the world;

its use is critical for more efficient concrete placements.• Regulatory requirements include a significant number of large mockups to be constructed to

ensure the suitability of self-consolidating concrete for specific structural members.

Scope:

• The project will have two phases – modeling phase and validation of the model.• The project will utilize existing off-the-shelf computational fluid dynamic (CFD) models to indicate

the flow of the self-consolidating concrete and then compare the CFD results with mockups.• Identify barriers for using computer-aided placements of concrete.

Value:

• Increased quality• Reduced need for mockups• Improved construction schedule and constructability based on quickly adjusted concrete mixtures• A better informed placement plan and mixture design development


EPC 2018-B Field Guide for Reinforcing Steel Inspections

Issue:• Rebar size and placement requirements are not readily accessible in the field.• Previous ANT field guides which are similar have been well received and useful.

Scope:

• Compile field guide with industry-accepted standards and inspection information.• Identify source of rebar details, differences in sizes of bars, deformation patterns, tie

patterns, explain splices, typical strengths, bending practices.• Include deformed bar, smooth bar, and post-tensioned steel in the guide.• Formatting includes field-friendly hard copy and tablet (potentially smartphone app).

Value:• Field guide is a low-cost, short-turnaround effort with potentially big impact at new-

build sites• Improved and more timely inspection for reinforcing steel

Originally a part of Rebar Initiative with the Mechanical Splicing project.


EPC 2018-C Image Processing for Data Development of Construction As-Builtsand Inspection

Issue:

• Image processing techniques are used to scan/id cracks in metals. • As-builts and placement inspections are used to measure specification tolerances, rebar

placements, concrete flatness/levelness (tomography), and configuration.• As-builts and placement inspections can be time consuming and costly.

Scope:

• Identify the applications of image processing to develop as-builts and inspections for concrete tomography, rebar placement compliance, and tolerances.

• Develop software code to process visual images and develop shape and spatial contouring and placement identification.

• Test the suitability and limitations of the software to indicate rebar placement, concrete tomography, module placement, and site configuration.

Value:

• Reduce the time for development of as-builts• Reduce the time for inspections of the rebar and/or concrete• Automatically identify deviations in material placement which need correction• Application can extend beyond reinforced concrete inspection (e.g.; pipe, conduit)


Increase Efficiency and Reduce Cost of ConstructionResearch Focus Area Technical Topic Completed Projects Current Projects 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021+

Increa

se Efficiency an

d Re

duce Cost o

f New

Nuclear Con

struction

Modern Materials, Tools, and Methods

Anchorage of High‐Strength Hooked

Bars(3002005440)

High Strength Reinforced Rebar

Mass Concrete Modeling and Temperature ControlMechanical Splicing

of Reinforcing Steel

Field Guide for Reinforcing Steel

Inspections

Alternative Methods to Protect Electrical Cable

Field Guide for Concrete Inspection

(3002000520)Optimization of Concrete Placements Update Field Guide

and Include SCC

Real‐Time Corrosion

Monitoring of Steel Liners Embedded in

Concrete Image Processing for Data Development

of Construction As‐Builts and Inspection

Best Practices for Soil Testing and Site Development

Address and Improve New Techniques

Demonstration of Self‐Consolidating

Concrete(3002005228)

Demonstration of Self‐Consolidating

Concrete

Demonstration of Potential SCC Flow Simulation Software

Best Practices for Using SCC for Mass Concrete

Moisture Tolerant Coatings for Open Top Construction

Enhancements to Modular Construction Usage for Nuclear Power Plants

Benchmarking and Lessons Learned

Construction Lessons Learned

[See Supply Chain RFA; Potential Scope Expansion]

Completed Project

Active Project

Scoped Project

Concept


EPC RFA – Development of Collaborative Engineering, Design Tools, and Processes Drivers:

– Inefficient and overlapping designs and calculations– Tools and processes developed in an industry-collaborative manner can reduce costs to stakeholders

Opportunities: – Develop engineering and design tools and processes– Deployment to owner/operators, suppliers, and regulators

Scope: – New engineering and design tools

Priorities:– Guideline and specification documents (URD, Siting Guide)– Calculation or Evaluation Methodologies (RI-ISI, EPZ)– Software Code Development (SACTI, Triton)– Large R&D Support Activities (iPWR Aerosol Project)


EPC 2017-A Vertical Response Motion Computation in SSI Analysis of Embedded Structures

Issue:

• Vertical input motion is calculated using V/H ratios applied to the calculated horizontal response spectrum at the foundation level in the soil column.

• As part of SSI analysis, the vertical free-field motion is amplified from foundation horizon to the ground surface.

• As a result, the vertical motion in SSI analysis is overestimated.

Scope:

• Using appropriate site dependent V/H ratios (the SSI methodology), computer programs can be modified so that the free-field motion in SSI analysis maintains the appropriate V/H ratio within the soil column.

• The approach will be tested for both the soil and rock sites using the modified SSI approach.• Identify a path for implementation based on the results of the project.

Value:

• Reduced seismic structural demands in vertical direction• Reduced vertical floor-response spectra• Reduced requirements for anchorage design and equipment qualification• Improved seismic margin/risk for SSCs (i.e., more accurate SSI loads)


EPC 2017-B Ground Motion Kappa Parameter Reassessment

Issue:

• Current seismic hazard estimates in the United States are showing considerable high frequency content, particularly at rock sites.

• Recent reviews of the “kappa” parameter suggest that the high frequency ground motion estimates may be conservative.

Scope:

• Reassess the original EPRI studies from 1995 that first suggested the high frequency ground motions.

• Review newer data and new data assessments from the NGA East project. • Estimate kappa for rock sites using the updated global ground motion data.• Develop updated empirical model and high frequency scaling factors for rock sites.• Identify regulatory hurdles for implementation of the updated parameter for rock sites.

Value:

• Provide more accurate ground-motion estimates for rock sites and seismic PRA evaluations• Reduce structural requirements for construction and structural members• Reduce in-structure response spectrum and anchorage requirements for equipment/components

pp gy

Co-funded project with EPRI’s Structural Reliability and IntegrityCo-funding sought from four utilities

Application extends to international sites and non-nuclear energy structures


EPC 2018-A Alternative Methods and Materials to Reinforce Concrete

Issue:

• Traditional reinforcing steel consists of “deformed” bars; they vary in strength, shape, and sizes.• Traditional reinforcing steel has greater tendency to corrode and consists of strengths which

lends towards congested structural designs, limited repair options, and reduced durability.• Alternative concrete reinforcements are available and considered acceptable by ACI.

Scope:

• Identify alternative methods for reinforcing concrete • Indicate the uses, benefits, and limitations of different types of reinforcement • The alternatives of reinforcements will include strips, bars, wraps, and fibers that consist of

materials which include epoxy, steel, enamel, carbon, and glass• Layout a roadmap to determine what would be needed for increased acceptance and usage

Value:

• Sites will have increased awareness of options to reinforce concrete to help reduce schedule and cost and improve quality by potentially increasing strength and toughness

• Improve the constructability of the reinforced concrete• Increase the options for repairing misplaced or under-reinforced areas• Improve durability of the structures by reducing the tendency towards common degradation


Development of Collaborative Engineering, Design Tools, and Processes

Research Focus Area Technical Topic Completed Projects Current Projects 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021+

Develop

men

t of C

ommon

Eng

inee

ring,

Design

Tools, and

Processes

Guideline and Specification Documents

EPRI Siting Guide Update

(3002005435)

Alternative Methods and Materials to Reinforce Concrete

Insulation Design and Thermal Cooling Changes for Passive Plant Relative to

Active Plant Designs

URD Revision 13(3002003129)(3002003130)

Guidance on Construction Documents and Failure Management

Revisit URD and Siting Guide

Documents for Potential Revision

Calculation or Evaluation

Methodologies

EPZ Size Evaluation

Vertical Response Motion

Computation in SSI of Embedded Structures

Seismic High Frequency LoadingFoundation and Site Development ‐

Design, Guidance, and Analysis for Wet Environments/Sites

Central and Eastern US Seismic Source

(1021097)NGA East Ground Motion Kappa Parameter

ReassessmentAlternative NDE of Steel‐Concrete Debonding and Internal Voids

Software Code Development

Triton ‐ Steam Generator Thermal Hydraulics Code

SACTI(3002006350)

Large R&D Support Activities

iPWR Aerosol Project

Completed Project

Active Project

Scoped Project

Concept


EPC RFA – Improve Quality of the Supply Chain for New Nuclear

Drivers: – Need to increase quality requirements for nuclear construction

Opportunities: – Lessons from current and recent new plant construction– Increase preparation for future builders– Increase the awareness of root causes for low supply-chain quality

Scope:– Development of tools for vendors and utilities to improve quality – supplier training, procurement

training, specification writing, engineering guidance on requirements and tolerances for drawings and calculations, generic guidance on ‘module’ specification, engineering review guidance and potential new tools for QC inspections.

Priorities:– Follow industry initiatives related to Supplier Quality– Benchmark industry lessons learned, root causes, and best practices– Develop tools to train and support owner/operators, constructors, and other suppliers


Improve Quality of the Supply Chain for New Nuclear

Research Focus Area Technical Topic Completed Projects Current Projects 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021+

Improv

e Qua

lity of th

e Su

pply

Chain for N

ew Nuclear

Participate with Industry [The ANT program will monitor industry via conferences, and workshops, and engagement with other stakeholders such as NEI and INPO]

Benchmarking

Construction Lessons Learned

[See Construction RFA; Potential Scope Expansion]

Develop New Tools

Supplier Quality Management(3002000521)

Best Practices for Prequalifying Suppliers and Vendors

Development of Comparison Code Document

Supply Reduction Study of

Supplementary Cementitious Materials and Alternatives

Proactive Obsolescence Management for New Plants

Technology Transfer of Procurement Processes/Tools from Other Industries

Standard Templates for Original Procurement of Nuclear Components,

Materials, and Services

Owners Requirements Document for a Coatings Program

Completed Project

Active Project

Scoped Project

Concept


TUESDAY, AUGUST 30




Proposed 2017 – 2018 Projects – MTA

Modern Technology Application (MTA)

MTA RFA #1: Advanced Monitoring Technology and Data Management

MTA 2017-B Assessment of Automation Technologies to Reduce Chemistry and Radiochemistry O&M Costs

MTA 2017-E Gaps and Opportunities for Sensor Applications

MTA 2018-C Technical Evaluation of Using IPAWS Notification System

MTA RFA #2: Technologies to Improve Human Performance, Machine Interaction, and Operational Effect.

MTA 2018-A Alarm Prioritization and Filtering Methodology Improvement

MTA 2017-C Evaluation of Indoor Positioning Systems

MTA 2018-B Common Robotic Platforms

MTA RFA #3: Gaps for Use of Digital Systems Technologies in New Plants

MTA 2017-A Risk Informed Cyber Security Methods

MTA 2017-D I&C Obsolescence – Long Term Hardware Storage and Aging Mechanism


Advanced Monitoring Technology and Data Management


MTA 2017-B Assessment of Automation Technologies to Reduce Chemistry and Radiochemistry O&M Costs

Issue:

• Automation of plant chemistry and RP activities (sampling and analysis) can significantly reduce O&M costs

• A key staff optimization solution for new and operating plants

Scope:

• Objective: evaluate technical and economic feasibility of automating chemistry/radiological sampling

• Identify/evaluate other plant chemistry tasks enabled by automated sampling/analysis

Value:

• Supports determination if automated chemistry/RP tasks are cost effective, other technical benefits

• Identifies currently available automation technology to meet nuclear plant sampling/analysis needs

Impact on new plants but fully applicable to operating plants


Why Invest in This Project?

Fully assess the technical capabilities of enabling technology capable of saving plant O&M costs– Potential staffing impact of 2 – 5 FTE if

deployedMost applicable to new plants

– SMRs– Advanced LWRsBut also immediately applicable to

operating fleetExplore other applications

Image sources: Vivoaquatics and Fountain-Bridge


Issue:

• Sensor technology abounds and continues to mature rapidly• There is still an industry gap between available, enabling technology, applications, and

cost to develop and deploy

Scope:

• Identify enabling sensor technologies for operating environments• Establish SMR and Advanced Reactor sensor needs and other gaps & opportunities• Define use cases and perform short demonstration

Value:• Detailed understanding of sensor technologies and potential applications & benefits• Short-term work with high-value return: identifying the gaps

MTA 2017-E Gaps and Opportunities for Sensor Applications

Understand advanced reactor technology sensor costs now


Project Approach and Scope

Advanced Reactor and SMR technologies are exploring as-yet defined operating environments– Significant opportunity to get out in

front of this issue and proactively establish end-state applications

Benchmark the industry and available technologiesDefine use cases based on

performance criteriaPerform simple demonstration (2nd

year of project)



Top-down approach to identify potential applications for various plant operating environments– Basis: operating plant Future state:

advanced plants– Identify and evaluate technologies– Quantify cost savings (e.g., staffing impacts)Support plant planning and design

decisions now Identify remaining knowledge gaps for

sensors in new plants

Pressure

Temperature


Issue:

• Capability to alert the public to take protective measures in the EPZ must do so promptly

• Current approach relies heavily on outdoor warning sirens• Newer technology is available that is more precise but unproven

Scope:

• Objective: evaluate requirements, technical effectiveness of newer technologies to alert the public and improve exposure risk

• Assess IPAWS and WEA to replace existing siren systems• Compare effectiveness value; develop implementation approach

Value:

• Reduce confusion and ambiguity of wide, imprecise alerts• Lower installation and maintenance costs• Highly refined, detailed alerting information

MTA 2018-C Technical Evaluation of Using IPAWS Notification System for Emergency Communication

yEstimated potential O&M savings of deploying modern alerting system:

> $2M / year and 1 – 2 FTE


Why Invest in This Project in 2018?

ANT can research and investigate the: – Effectiveness of the technology to meet performance and federal

alerting requirements– Regulatory barriers to implementation (significant issue)– Identify gaps to implementation; conduct a pilot integration with

utility partnerLong-term benefits for existing and new plants will be

quantified– ROI estimate: >$2M / year and up to 1 – 2 FTE staffing impactAdditional research project(s) would be needed to deploy and

realize full impact


Human Performance and Machine Interaction


Issue:

• Poor alarm system design can lead to alarm overload, operator perceptive ability, omission, and increased workload

• Current dynamic filtering priorities can lead to inaccurate calculations

Scope:

• Develop improved Alarm Processing and Diagnostic System (APDS) with event-based suppression (hierarchy) module

• Methodology will be tested and validated to demonstrate improvement in operator awareness, alarm status

Value:

• Development of “intelligent alarm system” per SMR staff optimization project• Can contribute to alarm reduction in different operating conditions• Develop recommendations for alarm management and implementation

MTA 2018-A Alarm Prioritization and Filtering Methodology Improvement

gg p j p pp yDevelop and build prototype system for demonstration

Suggestion to move project start up to 2017 apply results sooner


Additional Project Details

New plants are particularly sensitive to this issue (significant to exclusive digital I&C)– 50,000+ potential alarms and combinations in some systems– Presentation of alarms has a direct impact on responseAn event-based hierarchy module would reduce alarm

overload risks (APDS)

Source: Portland Tribune

APDS: tested and validated– Operator awareness

improvement



Intelligent alarm system identified as a high want(essential) for staffing impactSupports generic, vendor-

agnostic solutions

Co-Funding from Tecnatom for Development tasksSource: Tecnatom


Issue:

• GPS-level location information highly desirable indoors (in-plant)• Nuclear plant adoption is limited• IPS can interface with myriad plant information systems

Scope:

• Develop functional specifications for IPS• Detailed technical and cost review of available solutions• Identify use-cases for application of technology• Conduct proof-of-concept testing

Value:

• Collection of geo-referenced dosimetry and rad survey data• Further development of enabling technology for plants• Will provide key information about deploying the technology

MTA 2017-C Evaluation of Indoor Positioning Systems (IPS)

g yProof-of-concept testing to assess performance characteristics,

insight into installation and usability


Why Invest in This Project? Fully vet and evaluate IPS technologies

that can support dozens of other technologies– The foundational technology for improving

cost and staffing impact in other plant functions

Complete picture of costs: deployment, lifecycle, and O&M Key enabling technology for automating

RP tasks (monitoring and dosimetry, ALARA, rad monitoring/analysis)– Potential staffing impact exceeding 5 FTE

(if implemented with other complementary systems)

Source: Q-Track Corp.


Issue:

• Strong need for robotic support in normal and extreme environments (rad-hardened, high-temp, etc.); tight spaces

• Custom solutions are expensive and usually single purpose

Scope:

• Evaluate modular robotics that are small, modular, inexpensive, with multiple applications/environments

• Evaluate what qualifications or standards are required for off-the-shelf, plus who manages the platform (utility or contractor)

Value:

• Multiple O&M task benefits single robotic system• Address: worker dose, space constraints, cost• Multi-phased approach

MTA 2018-B Common Platform Robotics

Modular & reconfigurable robots are in use in other industries


Detailed Project Approach

Task 1: Industry evaluation, survey of modular robotics– Basic research (who’s using it?), benchmark (including standards)Task 2: Evaluate available reconfigurable platforms

– Vendor solutions and applications, lifecycle experience (cost, O&M)Task 3: Compare to custom solutions; cost-benefit evaluation

Source: Stanford University Source: M-Tran


Detailed Project Approach, cont’d

Task 4: Standards and qualification– Identify qualification requirements for

applications; commercial dedicationTask 5: Knowledge and application gaps

– Knowledge gap summary what is needed for adoption?

– Recommendation for demonstration, proof-of-concept test

Source: Gizmag

g g ( g y )Inspection staff impact potential

Quantifiable understanding of costs vs. custom, single-solution (including lifecycle)

http://swf.tubechop.com/tubechop.swf?vurl=QQSHFkITIiI&start=48.4&end=127.92&cid=8205091


Gaps for Use of Digital I&C Systems


Issue:

• Current cyber vulnerability and controls processes have struggled with technical effectiveness

• Efficient vulnerability resolution remains elusive• Little integration with other risk processes

Scope:

• Hazards analysis approach for digital & cyber elements• Determine effectiveness of controls • Connect cyber vulnerabilities to plant consequences

Value:

• A risk-based approach that links vulnerability with consequences• Investigation of risk analysis via PRA tool add-on• New plant use-case pilots add high impact

MTA 2017-A Risk Informed and Enhanced Cyber Security Vulnerability Assessment Methods for New Plants

Digital I&C Group active project ready for new plant stakeholder input

$700M - $1.2B on cyber securityimplementation

to-date


Funding for Phase 3 and 4 Phase 3 Scope:

– Pen and Ink Pilots with existing plants and new build– Onsite workshops with participants– Analysis of results after each workshop with iterative refinement and usability

of the methods and process– Develop final validated method and process and functional spec for

Phoenix/CAFTA cyber security module Phase 4 Scope:

– Develop Detail Phoenix/CAFTA (PRA) specification– Develop companion process guidance based on Phase 3 methods– Develop and implement a beta Phoenix module – Conduct onsite workshops with participants to validate and refine– Deliver final Phoenix Cyber Security module to members– Develop CBT/Training for technology transfer


Highly Leveraged Project

ANT Contribution : ~ 15% Total Project Funding

$4M funding (2014 – 2018)

TI

DOE

NUC

GEN

• Strategic Gap Funding (SGF)• I&C• ANT


Issue:

• Previous work recommended strategies for mitigating digital I&C obsolescence risk, including “stockpiling”

• What is the long-term storage capacity of I&C hardware?• What is the cost of planning for replacement and licensing risk?

Scope:

• Evaluate aging mechanisms of digital I&C hardware• Identify best-practice storage mechanisms and processes• Evaluate cost of equipment storage vs. alternative replacement

Value:

• Close a key gap in the obsolescence lifecycle planning process (LCMP)• Develop methodology for inventory practices and replacement processes• Better address obsolescence cost burdens

MTA 2017-D Digital I&C Obsolescence: Long-Term Hardware Storage and Aging Mechanisms

Co-funding with Digital I&C Group extremely likely


Why Invest in This Project?Establish and quantify long-term

storage and aging risks of critical digital I&C equipment– Build in to a proactive,

obsolescence management plan– Fully comprehend the obsolescence

cost burden of storageDigital-to-digital changes

continue to be leading I&C costs to the industry– Cyber security and Common Cause

FailureLearn from other industries’

experiences

Turbine Control

Control Rods

Pressurizer Spray

Letdown Control

ChargingPumps

Pressurizer Heaters

Turbine Bypass

FeedwaterControl

Network

Network

Rod Control

Feedwater Control

Pressurizer Level

Turbine Control

Pressurizer Pressure

Turbine Bypass

Original Analog Controls Obsolete, Digital Point Solution

Managed Platform


TUESDAY, AUGUST 30




TUESDAY, AUGUST 30




Proposed 2017 – 2018 Projects – M&C

Materials & Components (M&C)

M&C RFA #1: Advanced Fabrication and Manufacturing Techniques

M&C 2017-C Additive Manufacturing Development

M&C 2018-D Evaluation of New Anti-Corrosion Surface Treatment Technologies for New Plants

M&C 2018-E Development of Adaptive Feedback Welding for Repair and Fabrication

M&C RFA #2: Material Performance and Inspection

M&C 2017-A Investigation of New Residual Stress Mitigation Techniques

M&C 2017-B Comprehensive Identification of New Plant NDE Needs

M&C 2017-D Guidance on the Application of HDPE Piping

M&C 2018-A Economic Evaluation of Upgrading Materials for New Plants

M&C 2018-B PWSCC Testing and Revision to Alloy 690 Tubing Specification

M&C RFA #3: New Materials Development

M&C 2018-C Support of Advanced 52 Weld Metal Development and Enhancement


Materials & Components TAC Charter The Materials and Components technical area primarily addresses class 1, 2, and 3 piping systems and related components such as valves, heat exchangers, and pumps. For existing components and materials, we look to determine optimal methods for fabrication, installation, and operation. We also do R&D to identify and develop new applications of materials and components, investigating both metallic and non-metallic materials, which may perform better than existing applications. The M&C TAC also identifies and develops new or improved methods for joining, inspecting, and maintaining piping and components, including chemistry and other processes that can reduce or mitigate degradation mechanisms, to support decreased installation and O&M costs and increase reliability and safety.

Three Research Focus Areas have been identified by the TAC:– Advanced Manufacturing and Fabrication Techniques– Material Performance and Inspection– New Materials Development


M&C RFA – Advanced Manufacturing & Fabrication Drivers:

– Current manufacturing technologies can be antiquated, expensive, and time consuming– Often the current processes result in components susceptible to degradation mechanisms, quality

variations, difficult inspection, and challenging maintenance. Opportunities: New technologies provide the ability to fabricate nuclear plant components with

numerous benefits including – Quicker production, improved material and mechanical properties, greater design flexibility, alternate supply

chain, improved inspectability, and higher quality. Scope: Advanced & innovative techniques for the manufacture, processing, or joining of materials

for nuclear power applications with the ultimate goal of reducing cost, decreasing procurement time, and improving performance.

Priorities:‒ Powder Metallurgy (Feasibility and Evaluation, Elimination of DMW, Code Development, Can Fabrication,

ALWR and SMR Component Demonstration)‒ Additive Manufacturing (Additive Manufacturing Development) ‒ Advanced Welding Techniques (Thick Section Welding)


M&C 2017-C Additive Manufacturing Development

Issue:

• Additive Manufacturing (AM) is a developing technology that requires significant R&D, technology demonstration, updated standards, regulatory acceptance, and guidance for nuclear applications

Scope:

• Join ORNL Additive Manufacturing Consortium• Develop and implement roadmap for AM• Generate guidelines for implementation of Additive Manufacturing for nuclear• Demonstrate AM through mock-up fabrication (samples) and assessment

Value:

• Fill in knowledge and data gaps• Generate guidance for nuclear application• Lay the foundation for industry use of AM


M&C 2018-D Evaluation of New Anti-Degradation Surface Treatment Technologies

Issue:• New and improved anti-degradation surface treatment technologies have not been evaluated to

determine their effectiveness or applicability to new applications

Scope:

• Identify new surface treatment technologies• Identify key components for surface treatment• Analysis and down selection of new surface treatments and key components• Testing of new surface treatment technology

Value:

• Support the identification and development of new surface treatment technologies that are:• Less time-consuming to implement• Require less labor• Cheaper


M&C 2018-E Development of Adaptive Feedback Weldingfor Repair and Fabrication

Issue:• Current welding processes are slow and cannot adapt to changes in the welding geometry.

Scope:

• Develop sensing concepts that can recognize the welding cavity and geometries. • Develop robotic equipment capable of scanning the weld cavity and adjusting welding.

parameters to compensate for what is scanned.• Perform demonstrations of welding using the developed robotics.

Value:• Almost complete automation of welding fabrication.• Significant cost savings from reduction in labor hours and increased quality.


Just one more thing…


Qualification of Additive Manufacturing Components for Nuclear Applications

Issue:

• There is potential to deploy Additive Manufacturing (AM) methods to produce reactor internal components with complex geometries rapidly with improved performance, while reducing the cost and time to market.

• However, code and regulatory bodies are skeptical about adopting these components for real-life service due to the scatter in metallurgical and mechanical properties emanating from machine specific process variations.

Scope:

• Develop an innovative qualification strategy for complex nuclear components produced by laser powder bed AM.

• Leverage relevant technology from recent welding developments, as well as, emerging process analytics, high- performance computation models, in-situ monitoring and big-data mining.

Value:

• Laser-based power bed AM processes have the potential to develop an entirely new field for manufacturing nuclear internal components.

• This project will potentially determine if the laser powder bed AM can indeed manufacture nuclear components with robust quality and performance.

• Project will create a pathway to nuclear qualification of laser powder bed AM components.

Partnering with DOE and 2 other organizations. DOE contributing $1M, EPRI cost share is 20%


Advanced Manufacturing & FabricationResearch Focus Area Technical Topic

Recently Completed Projects

Current Projects 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021+

Advanced

Man

ufacturin

g an

d Fabrication

PM‐HIP

Elimination of DMWsAlloy Code

Development (ASTM & ASME)

Can Fabrication

Feasibility & evaluation (DOE Project)

ALWR & SMR Component Demonstration

Additive Manufacturing

Additive Manufacturing Development AM Qualification and Code AcceptanceORNL Additive Manufacturing Consortium

Advanced Welding

Thick Section Welding (WRTC Support)

Evaluation of Anti‐Corrosion Surface Treatment Technologies

Surface Treatment Tech Transfer

Adaptive Feedback Welding (AFW) AFW Tech Transfer

Misc.

Cost Comparison Between

Manufacturing Techniques

Repair of New Manufacturing Techniques

Completed Project Identifying Applications for Bi‐MetalllicsActive Project

Scoped ProjectTI Strategic Program Advanced Manufacturing (TI Project)

Concept


M&C RFA – Material Performance & Inspection Drivers: Current NDE requirements and technologies can be

– Expensive to implement and maintain– impactful to critical path during outage time

Opportunities: New techniques can better focus NDE resources by– Eliminating extraneous inspection locations & frequencies– Obtaining credit for reduced material susceptibility– Potentially mitigating indications at the source

Scope: Influencing plant operation through inspection & performance can be achieved four ways:1. Improve NDE equipment (speed, cost, accuracy)2. Develop NDE techniques (data manipulation, methods)3. Assess technical basis for inspection locations & frequencies4. Mitigate degradation/flaws at the source (RS improvement, material procurement/processing)

Priorities:‒ TAC will not emphasize 1 & 2, but will document issues and goals to feed EPRI NDE programs‒ Risk-Informed Methodologies (RI Strategies – AP1000 Pilot)‒ Technical Basis for Residual Stress Mitigation (RSM) (Residual Stress Guidelines, Real time NDE)‒ Material Specifications & Procurement (ALWR Water Chemistry Guidelines, EAF Data Generation)


M&C 2017-A Investigation of New Residual Stress Mitigation Techniques

Issue:• Many alternative Residual Stress Mitigation techniques are available in industry that have not

been investigated for nuclear application

Scope:

• Identify RSM techniques for evaluation• Identify key locations (thicknesses or geometries) that are good candidates for new RSM

techniques. What are applications that current techniques do not address?• Select RSM techniques for further evaluation• Develop a qualification plan• Conduct testing of RSM methods

Value:

• Identify new Residual Stress Mitigation Techniques that are potentially:• More effective at addressing residual stress• Less expensive• Available for difficult installations


M&C 2018-A Economic Evaluation of Upgrading Materials for New Plants

Issue:

• Using the best material for every system and component results in a plant that is too expensive to build, operate, and maintain

• Need to identify the optimal locations in the plant for the utilization of improved materials

Scope:

• Identification of Top Materials-Related Issues in Current Nuclear Plants• Identification of Plant Costs Associated with Management of the Top Materials-Related Issues• Economic Assessment of Materials Upgrades to Eliminate Materials-Related Issues

Value:• Provide an economic analysis on the benefit of selecting degradation adverse materials for

systems and components


M&C 2017-B Comprehensive Identification of New Plant NDE Needs

Issue:• The NDE committees are not aware of the specific NDE needs for new plants

Scope:

• Project will identify the inspection scenarios, commitments, and locations that are unique to the new plant designs

• Project will include opportunity assessments to indicate where applicable work has already started

• Report will include identifying access issues for performing NDE• New plant NDE technology gaps will be identified

Value:• Document the issues that are most important to new plants for leverage within the NDE

committees for new plant NDE technology development.


M&C 2017-D Guidance on the Application of HDPE Piping

Issue:

• The ANT project on ASME Code Acceptance of HDPE is coming to a close• There is a need to document lessons learned and develop guidelines for the procurement of

HDPE pipe to better educate and guide utilities around potential issues

Scope:

• Project will provide guidance on the procurement of both Non-Safety and Safety-Related HDPE to ensure it has the characteristics to sustain long term plant operation

• Report will not be a comprehensive guide to HDPE design; rather, it is intended to provide supplemental guidance to support utility engineers involved in the design, specification, and installation of HDPE piping

Value:

• Clearly documents the elements of HDPE specification and procurement that are necessary to ensure an acceptable product is placed in service

• Capstone of EPRI HDPE work• 50/50 cost share with BOPC


M&C 2018-B PWSCC Testing and Revision to Alloy 690 Specification

Issue:

• Several relatively new processes for fabrication or pre-treatment of steam generator tubing are currently being evaluated for incorporation into 690 Tubing Specification

• Further testing is necessary to justify the addition of these methods to the 690 specification

Scope:

• Project will conduct testing to evaluate whether three new processes have any impact on PWSCC initiation in Alloy 690 steam generator tubing

• Alloy 690 Specification would be revised to include the techniques that could be substantiated through testing

Value:

• Address key material integrity questions that will facilitate determining whether new pre-treatment and fabrication processes can be incorporated in the Alloy 690 specification.

• Formally accepting these processes in specification would facilitate the use of pre-filming during production for utilities seeking to minimize source term, radiation fields and worker exposure following SG replacement and/or new plant construction

• Cost Share with NSSMC


Material Performance & InspectionResearch Focus Area Technical Topic

Recently Completed Projects


Material P

erform

ance and

Inspectio

n

Risk Informed MethodsRI Procurement and ISI

RI Strategies – AP1000 Pilot Plants

Expand RI Applicability to SMR Designs

Volume of Primary Interest Inspections

Residual Stress Mitigation

Residual Stress Guidelines

Investigation of New Residual Stress Mitigation Techniques RSM Code Support

Real Time NDE during Welding (WRTC Support)Inspection Credit for Proactive

RSM

Material Specs and Procurement

Weld & Fabrication Critical Factors, 690 Fabrication

Guidelines

690 SG Tubing SpecSG Tube Pre‐filming Assessment (NSSMC

Support)Revise 690 Tubing Specification

690 Procurement Spec HDPE Application Guidelines (BOPC Support)Opportunities for

Enhanced Specification

Misc.

Single Side NDE New Plant NDE NeedsUpgraded Material Economic Analysis

Inspectability of New Plant Components

Water Chemistry for SMR’s

Completed ProjectALWR Water Chemistry Generic ALWR Water Chemistry Guidelines (Chemistry Support)

Active Project

Scoped ProjectEAF GAP Analysis EAF Long Term Testing Data Generation (BWRVIP, MRP, & PSCR Support)

Concept


M&C RFA – New Materials Development Drivers: Material properties are the ultimate limitation that drives

– Designs, configurations, and operating / maintenance limitations. Opportunities: The ability to improve on materials and their properties has a cascading

effect on all aspects of a nuclear plant, providing opportunities for– Simpler designs, accessible and inspectable configurations, and improved operating margin

and performance. Scope: Assess new material options and develop property data, address knowledge

gaps in pursuit of code or regulatory acceptance for mature materials. Priorities:

‒ Weld metals (52/152 PWSCC Initiation Time, 52M Weldability Screening Test)‒ BOP Material Options (ASME Code Acceptance of HDPE)‒ MMMs & MDMs (Review MMMs for gaps, SMR MMM)


M&C 2018-C Support of Advanced 52 Weld Metal Development and Enhancement

Issue:

• 52 type weld metals are notoriously difficult to consistently weld• Subtle changes in material chemistry or welding parameters can increase susceptibility to

cracking• Leads to extensive repair and rework costing millions of dollars

Scope:

• 52 type weld metal projects are currently under development in WRTC. This project would provide support to accelerate the following 2 projects.• New Alternative High Chromium Nickel-base Weld Metal - Development of a new filler material that is

resistant to stress corrosion cracking, solidification cracking, and ductility dip cracking• 52M Weldability Screening Test - Development of a simplified “go/no-go” weldability test to screen heats

of high chromium nickel-base weld metals for solidification and ductility dip cracking susceptibility

Value:• Increase weld quality and mitigate repair/rework• Reduce uncertainty and improve production schedules


New Materials Development

Research Focus Area

Technical TopicRecently Completed Projects


New

Materials Develop

men

t

Weld Metals

52/152 PWSCC Initiation Time (MRP Support)

Support of Advanced 52 Weld Metal Development and Enhancement

BOP Materials

HDPE (Oxidation, Radiation, Fire Testing, Seismic, Carbon fiber reinforced)

ASME Code Acceptance of HDPE (BOPC Support)

New Material Scoping

AdvancedReactors

Advanced Reactor Material

Development

Completed ProjectMaterials

Management Matrix

ALWR Designs SMR MMM’s (Design Specific)Active Project

Scoped Project

Concept


TUESDAY, AUGUST 30




Member Satisfaction - Background EPRI has captured member satisfaction

feedback in various forms for many years

Current member satisfaction survey adopted by Board in 2006

Results reviewed regularly with Board– one of Corporate Performance Indices (CPIs)

Member feedback used to drive continuous improvement across EPRI

Helps prioritize efforts – focus on areas with greatest impact on

satisfaction


Nuclear Member Satisfaction Survey Results

Overall Performance

Ease of Doing Business

Technical Program Value

Overall Satisfaction

2015 Results

2010-2015 Trend

92.3%

Overall Performance



86.1%

93.2%

92.4%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

• Impact of research on improving my business• The program's strategic priorities and directions• Quality of research results• Relevance of research carried out by the program• Technical staff expertise

Top ranked aspects of EPRI Experience

yWho completed the Survey


Category Initiative Timeframe

Research and Development

• Research Focus Areas• Project Overview Forms• Quality Management Program Implemented 2016

Tech Transfer

• Executive Summary• Onsite EPRI updates/regional meetings• International workshops• International NPC• Digital Strategy (ongoing)

Implemented 2016

Simplification• On-line Pricing• Invoice Review• New Pricing Model

Implemented 2016

Website • New Search Engine• Member Center Improvements Implemented 2016

Improvement Initiatives

Listening and Responding to the Feedback of our Members


Becomes

Digital Delivery Enhancements


Becomes

Digital Delivery Enhancements


New Search EngineThe search engine gets smarter over

time based on use. It tracks what people search and where they go with the results.

The more the search engine is used, the faster it learns.

As it learns, features such as relevance and search term

recognition will dramatically improve, and as a result improve

your search experience. You make the search engine better

by using it!


2015 Nuclear Member Satisfaction Scores, by Area≤86% 87%-90% ≥91%

Program Area Overall Performance



Overall Satisfaction Total

Nuclear Sector Council 94.4% 96.6% 81.1% 93.3% 91.3%

Materials Degradation / Aging 91.5% 92.1% 84.2% 92.1% 90.0%

Fuel Reliability 89.5% 91.4% 89.5% 89.5% 90.0%

Used Fuel and High-Level Waste Management 96.8% 96.0% 90.5% 97.8% 95.3%

Nondestructive Evaluation 90.0% 92.7% 81.8% 90.0% 88.6%

Equipment Reliability 91.0% 91.2% 83.8% 90.7% 89.2%

Risk and Safety Management 92.2% 94.4% 91.1% 91.1% 92.2%

Strategic Initiatives (ANT and LTO) 95.0% 95.7% 90.7% 95.7% 94.2%

Chemistry, Low-Level Waste and Radiation Management 94.4% 94.4% 88.8% 95.8% 93.3%

Total 92.3% 93.2% 86.1% 92.4% 91.0%


2015 Nuclear Member Satisfaction Scores, by Area≤86% 87%-90% ≥91%

Program Area Overall Performance




Nuclear Sector Council 94.4% 96.6% 81.1% 93.3% 91.3%

Materials Degradation / Aging 91.5% 92.1% 84.2% 92.1% 90.0%

Fuel Reliability 89.5% 91.4% 89.5% 89.5% 90.0%

Used Fuel and High-Level Waste Management 96.8% 96.0% 90.5% 97.8% 95.3%

Nondestructive Evaluation 90.0% 92.7% 81.8% 90.0% 88.6%

Equipment Reliability 91.0% 91.2% 83.8% 90.7% 89.2%

Risk and Safety Management 92.2% 94.4% 91.1% 91.1% 92.2%

Strategic Initiatives (ANT and LTO / ANT Only) 95.0% / 96% 95.7% / 98% 90.7% / 88% 95.7% / 96% 94.2% / 94.5%

Chemistry, Low-Level Waste and Radiation Management 94.4% 94.4% 88.8% 95.8% 93.3%

Total 92.3% 93.2% 86.1% 92.4% 91.0%


ANT Member Satisfaction, Year over Year

Year Overall Performance




2013 87.1% 87.1% 84.2% 84.2% 85.7%

2014 92.0% 88.0% 90.6% 90.6% 90.3%

2015 95.0% 95.7% 90.7% 95.7% 94.2%


ANT Specific Feedback from Last SurveyThings we are doing Great

Quality of Research Results

We need to keep this up and we need your help to make sure we do.

TAC, IC, and APC Involvement

Strategic Priorities and Direction

Technical Staff Expertise

Format Results are Delivered

Things we are doing Less Great

Impact of Research on Your Business The roadmaps, RFAs, and multi-yearplans are intended to address this.

Are they working?Relevance of Research

Ease of Understanding Content of Results New Executive Summaries Coming

Website See earlier slide on EPRI Search Engine


Survey instrument

Key components …1. Who you are

without a name and organization, we can’t count your input!

2. Number of years you have been an Advisor

3. How we’re doing

4. How you assess EPRI value

5. Key improvement in ease of doing business

6. Value you have received from this Program


Survey instrument

Key components7. Rate each statement based on how

satisfied you are8. Rank the top 5 statements as

indicated in the instructions9. Would you recommend EPRI10.If you are not satisfied with us in any

area, please tell us why

9

10

7

8


TUESDAY, AUGUST 30




Together…Shaping the Future of Electricity