28
Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants Laurie Burns Director of Member Activities EDUCAUSE Gathering of State Networks April 18, 2000

Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

  • Upload
    kuper

  • View
    21

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants. Laurie Burns Director of Member Activities. EDUCAUSE Gathering of State Networks April 18, 2000. What is Internet2?. A project of the University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development (UCAID) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

Laurie Burns

Director of Member Activities

EDUCAUSE Gathering of State NetworksApril 18, 2000

Page 2: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

2

What is Internet2?

A project of the University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development (UCAID)

An umbrella term for many activities, such as Abilene, various working groups, the middleware initiative, etc.

The organization its staff work for

The member community as a whole

Page 3: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

3

What’s UCAID?

The official corporate entity that takes in member dues and governs Internet2 activities

A 501(c)(3), non-profit organization

A less sexy name than Internet2

Page 4: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

4

How and when did Internet2 begin, and how has it grown? Fall 1996 - Internet2 project is created as a collaboration among 34 leading research universities

Fall 1997 - University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development is incorporated

April 1998 - Membership totals 123 regular University members, 30 Corporate members, and 22 Affiliate members

April 1999 - Membership totals 154 regular University members, 54 Corporate members, and 27 Affiliate members

March 2000 - Membership totals 176 regular University members, 72 Corporate members, and 36 Affiliate members

Page 5: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

5

How does Internet2 do its work?

Through its members• Regular

– US Colleges and Universities

• Affiliate– Non-profit and other research or education organizations

• Corporate– Members

– Sponsors

– Partners

• Collaboration Site Status– Applies to Affiliate and Corporate members; allows designation of

research and development site

Page 6: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

6

Where does Internet2’s revenue come from?Members pay dues

• Regular - $25,000/year• Affiliate - $10,000/year• Corporate

– Members - $10,000/year

– Sponsors - member dues plus up to $100,000 in-kind contribution

– Partners - member dues plus up to $1,000,000 in-kind contribution

• Collaboration Site Status– Applies to Affiliate and Corporate members; allows designation of

research and development site

– Increases dues to $25,000/year

Page 7: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

7

What activities and initiatives are underway?Working GroupsIPv6MeasurementMulticastNetwork ManagementNetwork StorageQuality of Service

InitiativesMiddlewareHealth Science Applications

RoutingSecurityTopologyDigital VideoResearch TVInternet Economics

Page 8: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

8

What are Internet2 Goals?

Enable new generation of applications not supported in current commodity Internet

Characteristics:Collaborative or group process support, with high degrees of

interactivity among participantsAccess to remote resources, such as online research instruments,

databases, digital libraries, and the movement of resources to other sites

Distributed computation and data handling, for aggregated cluster computing, data mining, and resource sharing

Immersive data visualization and virtual reality, for exploration of simulated environments

Page 9: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

9

Internet2 Goals

Re-create leading edge R&E network capability

Examples:

Core Middleware: Access Management

Performance measures

Multicast, QoS, Bandwidth brokers, IPv6

Testbed network environment for networking research use

Page 10: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

10

Internet2 Goals

Transfer technology and experience to the global production Internet

Work in partnership with corporate membership and partners

Facilitate cross-vendor collaborations

Facilitate vendor-researcher collaborations

Facilitate engagement of corporate labs

Page 11: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

11

What is the Abilene Network?

OC48 (2.4 gbps) national backboneSupported and operated by a partnership among Qwest, Cisco Systems, Nortel, and Indiana UniversityPeering agreements with 30 international networks History:

• April 1998 - Abilene Network announced• February 1999 - Abilene Network launched• April 2000 - 150 signed Participation Agreements

Page 12: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

12

Page 13: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

13

What are Abilene Participants?

Primary Participants• Regular members • Affiliate and Corporate members who also have Collaboration Site

Status

Secondary Participants• Educational institutions (including both not-for-profit and for-profit K-

20, technical, and trade schools), museums, art galleries, libraries, hospitals who are sponsored by a Regular University member

• Other non-educational, not-for-profit or for-profit organizations, sponsored by a Regular member, that require collaboration on instructional, clinical and/or research projects with Primary participants or with other Secondary participants

Page 14: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

14

What are Abilene Participants?

Network Participants• Research and/or instructional networks that have substantially

the same purposes and limitations as Internet2 and that subscribe to Abilene under arrangements approved by the UCAID Board

Connectors (not participants)• Connectors establish and manage the physical connections to

Abilene, and together with the Abilene Network Operations Center and campuses manage all the subsequent operations of the end to end network

Page 15: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

15

How does participation differ from membership?

“Membership” represents the official relationship organizations have with Internet2 and UCAID

“Participation” applies specifically to use of an Internet2 network, such as Abilene

Primary participants must also be members

Primary participants also pay an annual participation fee to Abilene ($20,000)

Page 16: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

16

What is the Abilene Conditions of Use Policy?

• Governs types of organizations that can connect• Governs types of traffic that can be sent/received

• Promotes traffic that primarily and clearly serves the teaching, learning, research, and clinical missions of US higher education

• Promotes traffic that is primarily the result of collaboration and other related work on instructional, clinical, and/or research projects and services

and

• Seeks to advance Internet2's goal of encouraging and enabling the development of advanced network applications

Page 17: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

17

Why was the CoU revised?

Rising interest in connecting others...• by Internet2 University members• by gigaPoP organizations• by corporate members

Evolution of the CoU to foster and support...• benefits to primary participants• existing or planned collaborations between and among members

and other organizations• direct relationships between the sponsor and the secondary• sponsorship responsibilities on the part of University members

Revised CoU approved by the Internet2 Network Planning and Policy Advisory Council (NPPAC) on 11/29/99

Page 18: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

18

What is the process for secondary nominations?

• Implemented with a simple nomination and approval process through a standard letter of sponsorship that indicates agreement to

– provide and maintain information about the means of connection

– ensure the secondary upholds the CoU

Page 19: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

19

What is the process for secondary nominations?

• Implemented with a simple application and approval process• Requires a description of the kinds of projects and collaborations

enabled by the connection (planned or existing)– outline of plans that the proposed Secondary participant has for

collaboration on instructional and/or research projects with other Abilene participants during the coming year

– annual submission of a written summary of the contributions made to Internet2

Page 20: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

20

What is the process for secondary nominations?

• Implemented with a simple application and approval process• Requires a description of the kinds of projects and collaborations

enabled by the connection (planned or existing)• Corporate lab nominations require a relatively greater degree of

description and justification than do educational organizations– “Traffic to and from educational and most non-profit sites is assumed to be the

result of collaboration and other related work with Primary and Secondary participants on instructional, clinical, and/or research projects and services.”

– “Traffic presented to Abilene from corporate sites is expected to be the result of appropriate partitioning of their respective corporate networks and to be similarly focused on collaboration and related work.”

Page 21: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

21

What is the process for secondary nominations?

• Implemented with a simple application and approval process• Requires a description of the kinds of projects and collaborations

enabled by the connection (planned or existing)• Corporate lab nominations require a relatively greater degree of

description and justification than do educational organizations• Requires no fees to be paid to Abilene or Internet2 (but may

involve fees paid to a gigaPoP or other connector organization)

Page 22: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

22

What’s the experience to date?Six approved secondaries

• Seattle Community College Association, sponsored by the University of Washington

• Visual History Foundation, sponsored by the University of Illinois-Chicago

• The Oregon Institute of Technology, sponsored by the University of Oregon

• Eastern Oregon University, sponsored by the University of Oregon• Western Oregon University, sponsored by the University of Oregon• Southern Oregon University, sponsored by the University of Oregon

Page 23: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

23

What’s the experience to date?

Several potential secondaries• Other 2-year and 4-year institutions in state systems (Georgia

and Nebraska)• State or local K-12 systems (Oregon, Florida, Oklahoma, Rhode

Island)• K-12 science museum (Georgia)• Federal labs (multiple locations)• State agencies (Oregon)

Significant issues with state-wide networks of K-12

Page 24: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

24

What issues have come up?

For state networks:• Network engineering efficiencies• Political realities• Concern that a different standard is being set for domestic

networks than for international networks with which Abilene peers

For Internet2• Dilution of Internet2’s primary mission• Potential to put Abilene in apparent competition with other ISPs

Page 25: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

25

What are the challenges?

• Fostering research into K-12’s use of high-speed connections and maintaining a principle focus on higher education

• Preserving the ability of gigaPoPs to maintain efficiency in routing and network management and creating flexible network architectures

• Strengthening the ability of state and regional networks to serve their diverse education constituents and preserving the focus on advanced applications and advanced networking technologies

• Maintaining consistency between US networks and international networks and ensuring that Internet2 peers with networks that have a shared purpose

Page 26: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

26

It’s not “if” It’s “how?” and “when?”

How can we, as a community, proceed in such a way as to preserve our focus on research and education while opening up capabilities to a wider variety of users and uses?

Page 27: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

27

What happens next?

Letter from NPPAC to membership FAQWork with gigaPoP community to find architectural solutions Review and refine CoU language and applications processReview terminologyPost applications on webBring forward your nominations!

Page 28: Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants

28

Questions?

http://www.internet2.edu/

http://www.ucaid.edu/abilene/

[email protected]