ADQ for Airports

Torunn I. CarlssonDirector Technical and Aeronautical Information Management

Avinor

ADQ IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP28-29 May 2013

Avinor’s Airports

• 46 airports• 5 mill people• 22 mill pax• ~10000 Pax

Status Airports dataorigination• All airports regularly survey (every ~2-5 year)

(Arial photography, laserscanning)• AMDB for all airports– 36 airports with 3D AMDB / 10 airports 2D

• Critical «points» (THR, Instr etc.) survey– Landsurveying company – full digital transfer

• For all data submitted to AIP: metadata and sourcedata recorded in originatordatabase

• GIS used at airports for operations – data maintenance

Challenges

• Lack of understanding of why ADQ?• Common message from the regulators in each

state?• Are the rules and guidelines clear enough?• Cost• Lack of priority – New EASA rules for certification– CDM– Other projects

Airport data / AMDB

• Consistency between the regulations• How do I as an airport report changes ?• Can the datamodell I use be used for reporting

to AISP?• Who has to save the data for historical

purposes?• Do I have to make my AMDB temporal?• CAD world

SLA

• SLA between airport and AISP required?– Cost?

• ADQ data originator Harmonized list vs EASA NPA ?

• Are they the same? Which one do I follow?

ObstaclesArea Hor. acc Ver. acc

2a 5 m 3 m

2b 5 m 3 m

2c 5 m 3 m

2d 5 m 3 m

3 .5 m .5 m

4 2.5 m 1 m

• Cost of obstacle surveying?• Who is paying?

TerrainTerrain data Hor.acc Ver.acc

Area 1 50 m 30 m

Area 2 5 m 3 m

Area 3 .5 m .5 m

Area 4 2.5 m 1 m

Terrain data collection :National Mapping authority?National civil aviation authority?ANSP?Airport?

WHY WORRY?

Example of obstacle surfaces around Norwegian airport