wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
Adhesive Interactions in Normal and Transformed Cells
Former Leading Researcher at Cancer Research Center of the Russian
Academy of Medical Sciences Moscow, Russia
[email protected]
ISBN 978-1-61779-303-5 e-ISBN 978-1-61779-304-2 DOI
10.1007/978-1-61779-304-2 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg
London
Library of Congress Control Number: 2011934257
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 All rights reserved.
This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part
without the written permission of the publisher (Humana Press, c/o
Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York,
NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with
reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of
information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer
software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or
hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of
trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if
they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an
expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to
proprietary rights.
Printed on acid-free paper
Humana Press is part of Springer Science+Business Media
(www.springer.com)
Yury A. Rovensky, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sci.
To my wife Tanya with love
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
vii
Preface
The ability of tissue cells to be attached to each other and to the
surrounding solid substance (extracellular matrix) is a pivotal
regulator of major cellular functions such as proliferation,
responses to growth-stimulating factors, cell survival, differ-
entiation, and migration of cells in an organism.
Therefore, the cellular adhesive interactions play a critical role
in basic biologi- cal processes such as formation of tissues and
organs in embryonic development, maintenance of structural
integrity of all tissues in an adult organism, and tissue
regeneration and remodeling. The adhesive interactions are also
involved in inflam- mation and degeneration processes, which are at
the basis of many diseases.
As a result of oncogenic transformation, the adhesive interactions
of transformed cells are significantly altered. In the pathological
behavior of malignant tumor cells, significant weakening of their
ability to adhere to each other, to normal cells, and to the
extracellular matrix, plays a key role. Alterations in these
adhesive interactions form the basis of invasion and metastasis of
malignant tumors.
Therefore, the understanding of mechanisms of cellular adhesive
interactions and their alterations in malignant tumors is very
important in both biological and medical aspects.
Adhesive Interactions in Normal and Transformed Cells starts with
the description of molecular composition of the extracellular
matrix, which tissue cells adhere to. The matrix proteins that are
bound with the specific cell surface receptors resulting in the
cell-matrix adhesion are also discussed.
Several sections are devoted to the cytoskeleton systems.
Particular attention is given to the actin filaments and
microtubules that play a pivotal role in cell-extracellular matrix
and cell–cell adhesive interactions, and also in cell migration.
The formation, regulation, and dynamics of these cytoskeleton
systems are examined.
viii Preface
Different types of pseudopodia that are formed and used by cells as
“driving organs” during cell spreading and cell migration are
described.
Various types of specific adhesion structures formed by cells in
order to attach to the extracellular matrix are considered.
Attention is given to focal adhesions (focal contacts), to their
structure, regulation, and dynamics, which play a critical role in
cell migration.
Several sections are devoted to the intracellular signal
transduction pathways. The signaling pathways are triggered by the
extracellular molecules (ligands) that bind to specialized cell
surface receptor proteins. Different types of cell surface
receptors are characterized. Particular attention is given to
integrin receptors, which as components of focal adhesions play a
key role in cell-matrix attachment and also fulfill functions of
transducers of intracellular signals. Different integrin receptor-
mediated signaling pathways that determine and control cell
morphology, prolifera- tion, survival, and locomotion are
considered. Also, the growth factor receptor-mediated mitogenic and
morphogenic signaling pathways are examined.
Special attention is given to significant alterations in the
integrin mediated cell- matrix adhesion caused by oncogenic
transformation of the cells. The consequences of these alterations
manifested in such typical traits of transformed cells as weaken-
ing of the cell-matrix adhesion, “anchorage independence”,
constitutive mitogenic activation, escape from anoikis, and high
locomotory activity are considered.
The movement of fibroblastic cells and different factors involved
in the cell loco- motion machinery are considered. These factors
include actin cytoskeleton reorga- nizations and microtubule
dynamics, the phenomenon of “contact inhibition of cell
locomotion”, and dynamic regulation of focal adhesions during cell
locomotion. The morphogenic action of soluble growth factors
resulting in cell locomotion is also examined.
Several sections are devoted to fundamental alterations in cell
locomotion machinery caused by oncogenic transformation of the
cells. These alterations apply to the pseudopodial activity and
focal adhesion formation in transformed cells, and also their
sensitivity to growth factors.
The ability of cells to respond to the adhesion heterogeneity or
various geometri- cal configurations (topography) of the
extracellular matrix surfaces is discussed in detail. The
topographic cell responses to cylindrical surfaces of high
curvatures or the surface reliefs of various kinds (such as
nanoscale or microscale linear grooves, holes, or vertical rods)
are examined. These responses apply to the cell shape, loco-
motion, and other cellular functions. The mechanisms of these cell
responses are discussed.
The alterations in the topographic cell responses caused by
oncogenic transfor- mation of cells are considered. In particular,
alterations of the cell shape, changes in the direction of cell
migration, and alterations in the functional activities as a result
of oncogenic transformation are described.
Last chapter of the book is devoted to the intercellular adhesive
interactions. The compositions of several types of the
intercellular adhesion structures are described. Particular
attention is paid to the adherens junctions, their structure and
dynamic regulation, which is the basis of cell rearrangement and
tissue integrity maintenance.
ixPreface
A critical contribution of cadherin receptors and local actin
cytoskeleton to the regulation of cell–cell adhesion is examined.
Signaling pathways coupling cadherin- mediated intercellular
contacts to cell proliferation are considered.
The cell–cell adhesion alterations caused by oncogenic
transformation of the cells are further examined. These alterations
result in uncontrolled proliferation of malignant tumor cells,
their inability to form orderly tissue structures, cancer inva-
sion, and metastasis.
Adhesive Interactions in Normal and Transformed Cells is based on
modern sci- entific data and includes the results of the author’s
long-term research. It is intended for researchers, postdocs,
undergraduate, and graduate students, whose scientific interests
are in the fields of cell biology, cancer biology, cancer research,
and devel- opmental biology.
West Hollywood, CA Yury A. Rovensky
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
xi
Acknowledgements
I am extremely grateful to Dr. Alexander V. Ljubimov (Cedars-Sinai
Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA) for critical reading of the
manuscript, exceptionally help- ful comments, stimulating
discussions, and valuable advices.
Generous help of Julia Y. Moers at all stages of the manuscript
preparation including processing of the figures and assistance in
preparing the References is highly appreciated.
I thank Dr. Eugene B. Mechetner (Stonsa Biopharm, Inc., Irvine, CA)
for his friendly encouragement and support.
I would like to express my gratitude to Dr.Tatyana M. Svitkina
(University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) for providing her
spectacular TEM photos and her valuable comments, and also to all
my collaborators, who gave me their figures; they are acknowledged
in the legends.
I thank Raymond T. Moers for his help. I am much obliged to all my
colleagues and friends, with whom I worked for
many years. I apologize to all those whose valuable work in this
field have not been refer-
enced due to space limits.
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
xiii
Contents
2 The Extracellular Matrix
.........................................................................
7 References
...................................................................................................
10
3 Cytoskeleton
..............................................................................................
13 3.1 Actin Filaments
..................................................................................
13
3.1.1 Actin-Binding Proteins
.......................................................... 16 3.1.2
Actin Filament Dynamics
...................................................... 20
3.2 Microtubules
......................................................................................
24 3.2.1 Motor Proteins
.......................................................................
27 3.2.2 Nonmotor Proteins
.................................................................
28
3.3 Intermediate Filaments
.......................................................................
29 References
...................................................................................................
31
4 Pseudopodia and Adhesion Structures
................................................... 37 4.1 The
Formation of Pseudopodia
.......................................................... 37 4.2
Cell–Extracellular Matrix Adhesion Structures
................................. 44
4.2.1 Focal Contacts (Focal Adhesions)
......................................... 45 4.2.2 Focal Complexes
....................................................................
50 4.2.3 Fibrillar Adhesions
.................................................................
51 4.2.4 Hemidesmosomes
..................................................................
51 4.2.5 Podosomes and Invadopodia
.................................................. 51
References
...................................................................................................
53
5 Adhesive Interactions of Tissue Cells with the Extracellular
Matrix
.........................................................................................................
57 5.1 Cell Spreading on the Extracellular Matrix Surface
.......................... 57
5.1.1 Cells in a Suspended State
..................................................... 57 5.1.2 The
Morphology of Cell Spreading Process
in Normal Cells
......................................................................
64
5.1.3 Morphological Alterations in the Spreading of Transformed
Cells..............................................................
74
5.2 The Signaling Pathways in the Spread Cells
..................................... 88 5.2.1 Cell Surface
Receptors
........................................................... 88
5.2.2 Intracellular Signal Transduction
........................................... 91
5.3 Signaling Pathways from Integrin and Growth Factor Receptors in
Normal Cells
.................................................................
94 5.3.1 Integrin Receptor-Mediated Mitogenic Signaling
Pathways
................................................................................
95 5.3.2 Growth Factor Receptor-Mediated Mitogenic
Signaling Pathways
................................................................ 96
5.3.3 Integrin and Growth Factor Receptor-Mediated
Antiapoptotic Signaling Pathways
......................................... 97 5.3.4 The “Anchorage
Dependence” ............................................... 99
5.3.5 Integrin and Growth Factor Receptor-Mediated
Morphogenic Signaling Pathways
......................................... 100 5.3.6
Integrin-Mediated Mechanical Force-Induced Signaling ......
105
5.4 Alterations in Integrin-Mediated Adhesion and Signaling in
Transformed Cells
..........................................................................
108 5.4.1 Defective Adhesive Function
................................................. 108 5.4.2
Alterations in the Mitogenic Signal Transduction .................
110 5.4.3 The “Anchorage Independence”
............................................ 111
References
...................................................................................................
113
6 Cell Migration
...........................................................................................
121 6.1 Factors Involved in Cell Migration
.................................................... 121
6.1.1 Formation of Pseudopodia
..................................................... 123 6.1.2
Polarization of Migrating Cells
.............................................. 126 6.1.3 Contact
Inhibition of Cell Migration .....................................
127 6.1.4 Effect of Growth Factors
........................................................ 128 6.1.5
Role of Focal Adhesions in Cell Migration
........................... 130
6.2 Abnormalities of Cell Migration Machinery in Transformed Cells
.. 132 6.2.1 Pseudopodial Activity with Actin-Myosin
Structure Deficiencies
............................................................ 133
6.2.2 Cell-Matrix Adhesion Alterations
.......................................... 134 6.2.3
Hypersensitivity to Mitogens-Motogens
................................ 135
References
...................................................................................................
137
7 Cell Responses to Chemical Heterogeneity of Substrata: Adhesive
“Islets” or “Paths”
..................................................................
145 References
.................................................................................................
152
8 Topographic Cell Responses
...................................................................
153 8.1 Cylindrical Substrata
........................................................................
154
8.1.1 Normal Cell Responses
........................................................ 154 8.1.2
Transformed Cell Responses
................................................ 158
xvContents
8.2 Grooved Substrata
............................................................................
161 8.2.1 Normal Cell Responses
........................................................ 161 8.2.2
Transformed Cell Responses
................................................ 163
8.3 Discontinuous Substrata
...................................................................
167 8.3.1 Lattices
.................................................................................
167 8.3.2 Multiple Vertvical Rods
....................................................... 172
8.4 Effects of the Substratum Surface Topography on Cell Adhesion,
Proliferation, and Synthetic Activities
............................................. 174
8.5 Mechanisms of Topographic Cell
Responses................................... 177 8.5.1 Cylindrical
Substrata
............................................................ 178
8.5.2 Grooved Substrata
................................................................
179 8.5.3 Lattice Substrata
...................................................................
180
References
.................................................................................................
181
9 Intercellular Adhesive Interactions
...................................................... 185 9.1
Cadherin-Mediated Intercellular Contacts: Adherens Junctions......
187
9.1.1 Structure of Adherence Junctions
........................................ 187 9.1.2 Dynamic
Regulation of Adherens Junctions ........................ 189 9.1.3
Contact Inhibition of Cell Proliferation
............................... 197
9.2 Altered Regulation of Adherens Junctions Caused by Oncogenic
Transformation
.......................................................... 200
9.2.1 Alterations in Cadherin–Catenin Complex
.......................... 201 9.2.2 Loss of Contact Inhibition of
Cell Proliferation ................... 204
References
.................................................................................................
205
Index
.................................................................................................................
217
CAM kinases Calmodulin dependent protein kinases cAMP Cyclic
adenosine monophosphate Cas (p130 Cas) Focal adhesion protein CDH1
Tumor suppressor gene encoding E-cadherin c-ErbB1/HER1
Proto-oncogene encoding EGF receptor CH-ILKBP Protein parvin c-met
Proto-oncogene encoding HGF/SF receptor Cobl Protein cordon-bleu
Cortactin Cortical actin-binding protein CTNNB1 Proto-oncogene
encoding b-catenin
xviii Abbreviations
EB1 (Microtubule plus-) end-binding protein1 EC1, EC5 Extracellular
cadherin subdomains E-cadherin Epithelial cadherin ECM
Extracellular matrix EGF Epidermal growth factor EMT
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition Ena/VASP
Enabled/vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein family ERM Ezrin,
radixin and moezin protein family
F-actin Filamentous actin FAK Focal adhesion tyrosine protein
kinase FGF Fibroblast growth factor FH domain Formin homology
domain FIP 200 Focal adhesion kinase family interaction protein of
200
kD FM Fluorescent microscopy formins Formin homology proteins
G protein Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G-actin Globular actin
GAP GTPase activating protein GDI GDP dissociation inhibitor GDP
Guanosine diphosphate GEF Guanine nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor GF Growth factor GFAP Glial
fibrillary acidic protein Girdin Girders of actin filaments protein
GPCR G protein coupled receptor GSK3b Glycogen synthase kinase-3 b
GTP Guanosine triphosphate GTPase Guanosine triphosphatase
HGF/SF Hepatocyte growth factor, scatter factor
IFs Intermediate filaments IGF-1 Insulin-like growth factor ILK
Integrin-linked protein kinase INK4a Tumor suppressor gene IP3
Inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate IQGAP1 IQ motif-containing GTPase
activating protein1
JMY Junction-mediated regulatory protein
MAP kinase (ERK) Mitogen-activated protein kinase (extracellular
signal- regulated kinase) mDia Formin homology protein MHC Myosin
heavy chain MLC Myosin light chain MMP Matrix metalloproteinase
MRTF Myocardin-related transcription factor MSF Migration
stimulating factor MT1-MMP Membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase
MTOC Microtubule-organizing center (centrosome)
N-cadherin Neural cadherin Necl Nectin-like immunoglobulin-like
adhesion molecule NPF Nucleation-promoting factors
p140 Cap Cas-associated protein p27/KIP1 Tumor suppressor gene p53
Tumor suppressor gene, encoding p53 protein PAK p21-activating
protein kinase P-cadherin Placental cadherin PDGF Platelet-derived
growth factor PI Phosphatidylinositol PI3K Phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase PIK Phosphatidylinositol kinase PINCH Particularly
interesting new cystein- histidine-rich
protein PIP Phosphoinositide PIP2 Phosphatidylinositol biphosphate
PIP3 Phosphatidylinositol triphosphate PIPK Phosphatidylinositol
phosphate kinase PKA Protein kinase A, cAMP-dependent protein
kinase PKB (PKB/Akt) Protein kinase B PKC Protein kinase C PTEN
Tumor suppressor gene, encoding phosphatase and
tensin homolog (PTEN) protein
Rab, Ras, Rho GTPases Families of small GTPases Rac, Rho, Cdc42
Members of Rho family of small GTPases Rap1 Member of Ras family of
small GTPases R-cadherin Retinal cadherin RGD
Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid sequence ROCK Rho-associated kinase,
Rho kinase RTK Receptor tyrosine kinase
xx Abbreviations
Scar(WAVE) Suppressor of cAMP receptor SEM Scanning electron
microscopy SMA Alpha-smooth muscle actin Small G proteins Small
GTPases, Ras superfamily GTPases SNAIL1 Transcription repressor of
CDH1 gene
Tcf/Lef T-cell factor/lymphocyte- enhancer factor TGF-a
Transforming growth factor TIAM1 Rac-1 specific exchange factor
TIMP Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase +TIP Microtubule
plus-end tracking protein
VASP A member of Ena/VASP protein family VE-cadherin Vascular
endothelial cadherin VEGF Vascular endothelial growth factor
WAF1 p21 protein, a cell cycle inhibitor WASP Wiscott-Aldrich
syndrome protein family WASP/WAVE Wiscott-Aldrich syndrome protein
(WASP) family that (WASP/Scar) includes WASP family
verprolin-homologous (WAVE)
proteins WAVE (Scar) WASP family verprolin-homologous proteins WH2
WASP-homolog 2 domain WHAMM WASP homolog associated protein with
actin, mem-
branes, and microtubules WIP WASP-interacting protein Wnt Protein
family. The name “Wnt” is a combination of Wg
(“wingless” gene in Drosophila melanogaster) and “Int” (mouse
oncogene)
Wnt1 glycoprotein Protein encoded by WNT1 proto-oncogene
XMAP215 Microtubule associated protein
1Y.A. Rovensky, Adhesive Interactions in Normal and Transformed
Cells, DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-304-2_1, © Springer Science+Business
Media, LLC 2011
In multicellular animal organisms, tissue cells exist and function
under the conditions of their direct contacts with the
extracellular matrix and with each other.
The extracellular matrix is a regulated three-dimensional frame, on
the surface of and inside which the tissue cells attach, spread,
move and interact with each other. The extracellular matrix
consists of complex proteins composed of proteins and
carbohydrates. These complex proteins are secreted by tissue cells.
The protein– carbohydrate complexes are organized in an orderly
network, the extracellular matrix.
One type of the protein–carbohydrate complexes is represented by
proteoglycans that are composed of proteins with covalently bound
polysaccharides, glycosamino- glycans. Proteoglycans form strongly
hydrated gels creating the tissue resilience that resists
compression.
Other types of the protein–carbohydrate complexes are glycoproteins
and pro- teoglycans, composed of proteins with bound
oligosaccharides. Among the glyco- proteins of the extracellular
matrix, the most important ones are collagens of at least 29 types,
elastin, fibronectin, and laminins. These are fibrillar proteins
involved in the formation of specialized structures of the matrix,
fibers and basement mem- branes. The collagen and elastin fibers
have mainly structural functions; elastin fibers are capable of
tension and compression. Basement membranes include col- lagens,
laminins, nidogens, and sometimes fibronectin. Glycoproteins
fibronectin and laminin have mainly adhesion functions. These
proteins critically contribute to adhesion of cells to the matrix
and exert the regulating influence on cell migration.
Animal tissue cells have the ability to attach to and spread on the
extracellular matrix, to migrate to new areas of the matrix, and to
respond to its physical- chemical characteristics and geometrical
configurations. The tissue cells enter into the contacts with each
other to form junctions, and these intercellular junctions are
dynamically regulated.
All these cell activities are, in essence, the “cell–extracellular
matrix” or “cell– cell” adhesive interactions.
Chapter 1 Introduction
2 1 Introduction
The adhesive interactions exert the strong controlling influence on
the morphology of tissue cells, their locomotion and proliferation.
The contacts of cells with the extra- cellular matrix or to each
other determine the cell shapes, orientation of the cells, their
locomotion activity, directions of the cell migrations, the
survival of the cells and their ability to proliferate.
Adhesive interactions of “cell–extracellular matrix” and
“cell–cell” types play the most important role both in
embryogenesis and in the adult organism, ensuring the preservation
of the structural integrity of all tissues and their normal
functioning.
Adhesive interactions are the basis of the morphogenesis, when the
displacements of cells over the basement membranes and fibers of
the extracellular matrix, accompanied by the selective formation of
stable intercellular adhesions, lead to the development of specific
tissue structures. Adhesive interactions play important role in the
regenerative processes, when the migration of connective tissue
cells into the wound occurs direc- tionally, being subordinate to
the orientation of the matrix fibers. Another example, which
indicates the role of adhesive interactions in the organism, is the
attachment of platelets to the microvascular endothelium, which is
an important step in thrombosis.
Adhesive interactions are the regulators of survival and
proliferative activity of tissue cells. Most of the normal cell
types are capable of surviving and proliferating only being
attached and spread on the surface of the solid substratum – the
extracel- lular matrix (this phenomenon is termed substratum
dependence of cell prolifera- tion, or anchorage dependence).
Losing the connections with the matrix, normal cells lose the
ability to respond by proliferation to the soluble growth factors;
many types of the unattached cells undergo programmed suicide,
termed apoptosis (spe- cifically, its variety, anoikis).
The inhibition of proliferation of normal tissue cells after the
cell monolayer for- mation and the establishment of stable
adhesions between the cells (this phenomenon is termed contact
inhibition of cell proliferation) is another example of the
regulating influence of the adhesive interactions. Just as the
anchorage dependence, this property plays an important role in the
maintenance of the definite numbers of cells in different tissues,
the retention of their structural integrity, in regeneration
processes, etc.
Thus, the behavior of normal tissue cells influenced by the
adhesive interactions is controllable in the sense that it is
checked and regulated by the extracellular matrix and surrounding
cells.
Oncogenic (tumorigenic) transformation of tissue cells with the
subsequent devel- opment of malignant or benign tumors is caused by
the alterations of the specific normal genes termed proto-oncogenes
and tumor suppressor genes [1, 2]. These genes play key roles in
the life of a normal cell. They control cell morphology and
cytoskeleton, cell proliferation and the adhesive interactions of
the cells with the extracellular matrix and with each other. The
proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes also control apoptosis –
the active mechanism of cell suicide that protects an organism from
the accumulation of the cells with genetic alterations [3].
(a) Proto-oncogenes are the group of normal genes in the genome
(there are more than 100 proto-oncogenes in the human
genome).
The products of these genes, i.e., the proteins encoded by them,
are the components of the intracellular signal transduction
pathways. In particular, these
3 1 Introduction
proteins participate in the transduction of mitogenic signals
initiated by soluble growth factors and (or) cell adhesive bonds to
the extracellular matrix. Thus, the products of the proto-oncogenes
promote the multiplication of cells, in that way playing the role
of the positive regulators of cell proliferation. These proteins
take part in the control of cytoskeleton reorganization and cell
morphology changes, in adhesive interactions of cells with the
extracellular matrix and with each other. These proteins also take
part in the regulation of apoptosis.
Because of the mutations of the proto-oncogenes or their
translocations caused by the chromosomal rearrangements, the
proto-oncogenes become per- manently activated: their expressions
are permanently increased, they are not being “turned off,” and the
proteins encoded by them have altered functional activities and/or
structures. The proto-oncogenes can also undergo the amplifi-
cation: the number of copies of the gene considerably increases,
and because of that, a quantity of the encoded protein grows.
Such altered and permanently activated proto-oncogenes are termed
oncogenes.
Thus, because of the genetic alterations, the proto-oncogenes are
turned into the permanently activated oncogenes encoding the
proteins termed oncoproteins.
The oncoproteins are responsible for the oncogenic transformation
of the tissue cells and for the characteristic features of
transformed cells. The onco- genes can induce the development of
benign and malignant tumors.
(b) Tumor suppressor genes encode the proteins, which act as
inhibitors in the intra- cellular transduction pathways of the
mitogenic signals. Thus, whereas proto- oncogenes carry out
positive control of the proliferation of cells, promoting them to
multiply, the tumor suppressor genes are negative regulators of
cell prolifera- tion, protecting the cells from deregulated
multiplication. The tumor suppressor genes induce apoptosis, and
favor the maintenance of the cell genome stability.
Because of the inactivating mutations of the tumor suppressor
genes, they get “knocked out,” which may abolish negative control
of the cell proliferation and apoptosis stimulation [3].
Inactivation of the some tumor suppressor genes can cause the
oncogenic transformation of the tissue cells and the development of
tumors.
The chemical carcinogens, ultraviolet or ionized irradiation can
induce mutations and other genetic alterations causing the
conversion of the proto- oncogenes to the permanently activated
oncogenes, or the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. The
oncogenes can be delivered into cells by oncogenic viruses. Because
of all these alterations normal tissue cells become transformed,
and finally different kinds of malignant tumors can develop.
Transformed cells have altered morphology, permanently stimulated
and unregulated proliferative activity, and the block of apoptosis;
the regulatory influences of the adhesive interactions of the cells
with the extracellular matrix and with each other weaken or totally
disappear.
These characteristic features of the transformed cells determine
their uncon- trollable behavior in an organism. This uncontrollable
behavior has both high biological and medical significance.
4 1 Introduction
Oncogenic transformation of tissue cells results in serious
disturbances of adhesive interactions.
These disturbances result in the deregulation of survival and
proliferation of tumor cells and are the basis of important
manifestations of anomalous, uncontrol- lable cell behavior.
Neither cell detachment from the extracellular matrix nor the
intercellular contacts inhibit the growth of tumor cells, which
continue to prolifer- ate, crawling over each other and forming the
multilayered foci. This leads to the disorganization of the regular
tissue structure, which is typical for malignant tumors. Because of
altered adhesive interactions of tumor cells with each other, with
normal cells and with the extracellular matrix, some tumor cells
are easily separated from the malignant tumor. They actively
penetrate surrounding healthy tissues, including lymph- and blood
microcirculation system. The loss of substratum dependence of cell
proliferation (termed anchorage independence) allows for the tumor
cells (at least, for some of them), which enter the
microcirculation system, to survive in their suspended state and
circulate for some time. They can be retained at certain sites of
microvasculature and can attach to the vascular endothelium with
subsequent vessel penetration and formation of secondary foci of
malignant tumor growth – metastases. In the cascade of events in
malignant tumor invasion, the changes in morphology and locomotion
of tumor cells take essential place. These changes are also related
to the abnormalities of adhesive interactions.
The study of adhesive interactions “cell–extracellular matrix” and
“cell–cell” can be successfully carried out in vitro (out of the
organism) under the conditions of the cultivation of cells in an
artificial nutrient medium. Under these conditions cells can
spread, move, contact with each other and proliferate on the flat
bottoms of culture dishes. The extracellular matrix components are
secreted by tissue cells not only in the organism, but also in the
cell culture conditions. For example, fibroblasts and endothelial
cells in culture secrete fibronectin; many types of cells secrete
col- lagens, and epithelial cells secrete laminins. These proteins
and secreted proteogly- cans being adsorbed on the culture dishes,
form thin interlayer, which actually performs the role of solid
substratum for the cells. Thus, both in the organism and in the
cell culture conditions, tissue cells establish adhesive
interactions with the surfaces of the extracellular matrix formed
by the cells.
The next chapters will describe “cell–extracellular matrix” and
“cell–cell” adhe- sive interactions in normal cells, and also their
alterations in the cells as a result of oncogenic transformation.
We will mostly analyze data on cultured normal cells of two main
tissue types: connective tissue cells (fibroblastic cells) and
epithelial cells. We will also discuss adhesive properties of
various cultured transformed (by chemical carcinogens, oncogenic
viruses or spontaneously transformed) cells of mesenchymal or
epithelial origin; those cells in the future will be called
“transformed fibroblasts” or “transformed epitheliocytes,”
respectively.
5References
References
1. Kopnin BP (2000) Targets of oncogenes and tumor suppressors: key
for understanding basic mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Biochemistry
(Mosc) 65(1):2–27
2. Abelev GI, Eraiser TL (2008) On the path to understanding the
nature of cancer. Biochemistry (Mosc) 73(5):487–497.
doi:10.1134/S0006297908050015 DOI:dx.doi.org
3. Cotter TG (2009) Apoptosis and cancer: the genesis of a research
field. Nat Rev Cancer 9(7):501–507. doi:10.1038/nrc2663
DOI:dx.doi.org
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
7Y.A. Rovensky, Adhesive Interactions in Normal and Transformed
Cells, DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-304-2_2, © Springer Science+Business
Media, LLC 2011
Abstract The extracellular matrix is the ordered macromolecular
network, on the surface of which and inside the tissue cells are
attached to it and to each other, migrate, proliferate or survive.
The matrix is composed of protein–carbohydrate complexes, which, in
particular, include the glycoproteins carrying out mainly
structural or mainly adhesive functions. The extracellular matrix
is not only a mechanical framework but also a regulator of cell
behavior. The matrix proteins are bound with the specific cell
surface receptors resulting in the cell–matrix adhesion, which
exerts effect on cell shapes, migration, proliferation, cell
survival, and metabolism.
In multicellular animal organisms, the majority of tissue cells are
surrounded by the complex orderly network of interconnected
extracellular macromolecules termed the extracellular matrix. The
matrix consists of secreted complex molecules containing covalently
attached protein and carbohydrate moieties; these matrix
macromolecules are called protein–carbohydrate complexes. The
extracellular matrix also includes highly specialized structures,
such as cartilage, tendons, basement membranes, and also (with
secondary deposition of calcium phosphate crystals) bones and
teeth.
The matrix macromolecules are produced and secreted by fibroblasts
in connec- tive tissue, chondroblasts in cartilage, osteoblasts in
bone, histiocytes (macrophages in connective tissue), mast cells,
epithelial cells in parenchymal organs, muscle cells, and
endothelial cells of blood vessels. Molecular composition of the
matrix is also influenced by white blood cells, which can migrate
from blood vessel into the matrix in response to the specific
stimuli.
The molecular composition of the extracellular matrix includes
several classes of the protein–carbohydrate complexes. The
carbohydrate component content in these complexes may vary from
less than 10% to more than 95%.
(a) Proteoglycans are composed of the proteins (called core
proteins) covalently attached to long nonbranched chains of
polysaccharides, glycosaminoglycans. The polysaccharide content is
more than 95% in the proteoglycans.
Chapter 2 The Extracellular Matrix
8 2 The Extracellular Matrix
Glycosaminoglycans include several families: hyaluronic acid (which
is in a free state, not bound to the protein), chondroitin
sulfates, dermatan sulfates, keratan sulfates, heparin, and heparan
sulfates.
Owing to their high hydrophilia, glycosaminoglycans occupy large
volumes in tissues, forming strongly hydrated gels that cause
tissue turgor (resilience). The turgor gives the tissue an ability
to resist compression forces. For example, an articular cartilage
can resist mechanical pressures of a hundred atmospheres.
Proteoglycans can form huge polymeric complexes in the
extracellular matrix. Besides providing tissue turgor,
proteoglycans can also be connected to other extracellular matrix
proteins forming complex structures, e.g., basement
membranes.
Proteoglycans, such as heparan sulfate proteoglycans, are able to
bind to and interact with a variety of proteins, including growth
factors, some extracellular matrix components, and other molecules.
Heparan sulfate proteoglycans can be involved in intracellular
signaling as cell surface receptors or coreceptors for multiple
ligands to modulate the distinct signal transduction pathways
[1–4]. For instance, syndecans, which are members of the heparan
sulfate proteoglycan family, act as coreceptors for growth factors
in conjunction with cell surface integrin receptors and are
involved in the regulation of cell–extracellular matrix adhesion
and migration [5–9].
(b) Glycoproteins and proteoglycans consist of proteins with
attached oligosaccha- rides. Glycoproteins and proteoglycans are
similar in their structures and differ only in their carbohydrate
content, which is significantly lower in glycoproteins (less than
10%, in comparison with 10–50% in proteoglycans).
In contrast to proteoglycans, the carbohydrate component in
glycoproteins is represented by short branched oligosaccharides,
often with sialic acid at their ends.
The most important glycoproteins of the extracellular matrix are
represented by proteins of two functional types:
Collagen and elastin proteins that are mainly structural.•
Fibronectin and laminin proteins that are mainly adhesive.•
Collagens are the main proteins of the extracellular matrix. They
account for 25% of total protein content in a human organism.
Unlike proteoglycans, collagens pro- vide resistance to the
mechanical stretching of a tissue, whereas proteoglycans oppose to
its compression. Collagens are secreted by the cells of connective
tissue, such as fibroblasts, osteoblasts, chondroblasts, and many
other cells [10, 11].
To date, at least 29 types of collagen (they are collagen isoforms)
are known. All collagen molecules contain a stiff triple helix
structure: three polypeptide chains (named a-chains) are twisted up
to the regular helix forming a collagen molecule. Many collagen
types also have noncollagenous domains that do not form triple
helices. The carbohydrate component in collagens is represented by
monosaccha- rides and disaccharides.
Collagens types I–III are the main collagens of connective tissues;
type I collagen accounts for 90% of total collagen content in a
human organism. After their secretion,
92 The Extracellular Matrix
molecules of collagen types I–III self-assemble into orderly
polymers called collagen fibrils. The fibrils are further assembled
to fibers of several micrometers (mm) in thickness called collagen
fibers.
Type IV collagen is a main component of basement membranes that
also contain type VII collagen and some other collagen types.
Types V, IX, and XII collagens provide connections of the collagen
fibers with other proteins of the extracellular matrix.
Elastin, unlike collagen, does not form the stiff triple helix. An
elastin molecule consists of flexible polypeptide chains and has an
ability to be reversibly unrolled under the action of mechanical
stretching forces. Like collagen, elastin molecules are secreted
into the extracellular space, where they are connected with each
other to form fibers and sheets. The elastic fibers are coated by
microfibrils of 10–20 nanometers (nm) in diameter. The microfibrils
contain glycoproteins called fibril- lins [12] that are members of
the fibronectin family. These microfibrils obviously play an
important role in the formation of elastin fibers.
There is a striking difference between the mechanical
characteristics of the stiff, nontensile collagen fibers and the
rubber-like network of elastic fibers. The ability of elastic
fibers to be stretched allows the tissues to restore their shapes
after mechanical influences.
Fibronectin. The extracellular matrix contains several adhesive
noncollagenous pro- teins. Their characteristic features are the
domains able to specifically bind with the cell surface receptors.
The necessary component of these domains is the amino acid sequence
arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD).
Fibronectin is one of the adhesive glycoproteins providing the
attachment of cells to the extracellular matrix. Fibronectin is
secreted by various types of cells, including fibroblasts and
epithelial cells. There are at least 20 different fibronectin
isoforms in humans. Secreted fibronectin molecules assemble into
fibrils in the matrix. The fibronectin fibrillogenesis is initiated
by the cell surface integrin recep- tors [13, 14]. Some part of
fibronectin in form of fibrils is connected with the cell surfaces.
Fibronectin in soluble state is found in blood and other biological
fluids.
Fibronectin has several domains, which can specifically bind to the
cells and also to other matrix molecules, such as collagens (the
strongest binding being with type III collagen) and heparin.
Laminins (at least 15 isoforms identified so far) are cross-shaped
trimeric adhesive glycoproteins that have different domains to
specifically bind to cells, type IV col- lagen, nidogens, and some
glycosaminoglycans. Laminins, just as type IV collagen and
fibronectin, are components of basement membranes.
Laminins mediate the attachment of parenchymal cells to type IV
collagen thereby providing the interaction between cells and
basement membranes.
Other extracellular matrix glycoproteins are nidogens, tenascins,
and fibulins.
Nidogens (entactins) bind to both laminin and type IV collagen
forming the addi- tional connection between laminins and
collagen.
10 2 The Extracellular Matrix
Tenascin family of proteins (tenascin-C, -X, -R, and -W) can bind
fibronectin. However, unlike fibronectin, tenascins have both cell
adhesive and antiadhesive functions depending on the cell type.
These different functions are mediated by different tenascin
domains; the number of these domains in a tenascin molecule varies
because of alternative splicing [15, 16].
Fibulins can interact with many matrix components, such as some
basement mem- brane proteins, fibronectin, fibrillin, and
proteoglycans, to form supramolecular structures within the matrix
[17].
The extracellular matrix is not only a mechanical framework that
stabilizes a tissue structure. The matrix plays a much more active
and complex role in the regulation of cell behavior, influencing
the shape, migration, proliferation, survival, and metabolism of
cells, which are involved in adhesive interactions with the matrix
[18–20].
Migrations of cells during embryogenesis or in regeneration
processes depend on the extracellular matrix.
The matrix molecules are involved in acute and chronic inflammation
in tissues and also in such widespread human diseases as rheumatoid
arthritis, osteoarthritis, asthma, and others [21–26]. The collagen
diseases (collagenosis) are caused by genetic disturbances in the
expression and regulation of extracellular matrix mole- cules. For
instance, mutations in the genes encoding types I, III, or V
collagen cause heritable connective tissues disorders, mutations in
the gene encoding type VI col- lagen result in congenital muscular
dystrophy or myopathies, and mutations in the genes encoding types
II, IX, and XI collagen cause skeletal dysplasias [27–29].
The problem of cancer cell invasion and metastasis is closely
related to the extra- cellular matrix.
Adhesive interactions of tissue cells with the extracellular matrix
include the following:
1. Spreading of cells on the extracellular matrix. 2. Active
displacement of cells (cell migration). 3. Cell responses to the
chemical heterogeneity of the extracellular matrix. 4. Cell
responses to the geometric configuration of the extracellular
matrix.
All these adhesive interactions are accomplished by means of two
base cellular functions: formation of the pseudopodia and formation
of the special adhesive structures, which ensure the attachment of
cells to the extracellular matrix.
References
1. Heinegård D (2009) Proteoglycans and more- from molecules to
biology. Int J Exp Pathol 90(6):575–586
2. Kirn-Safran C, Farach-Carson MC, Carson DD (2009)
Multifunctionality of extracellular and cell surface heparan
sulfate proteoglycans. Cell Mol Life Sci 66(21):3421–3434.
doi:10.1007/ s00018-009-0096-1 DOI:dx.doi.org
3. Schaefer L, Schaefer RM (2010) Proteoglycans: from structural
compounds to signaling molecules. Cell Tissue Res 339(1):237–246.
doi:10.1007/s00441-009-0821-y DOI:dx.doi.org
11References
4. Mythreye K, Blobe GC (2009) Proteoglycan signaling co-receptors:
roles in cell adhesion, migration and invasion. Cell Signal
21(11):1548–1558. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.05.001
DOI:dx.doi.org
5. Xian X, Gopal S, Couchman JR (2010) Syndecans as receptors and
organizers of the extracellular matrix. Cell Tissue Res
339(1):31–46. doi:10.1007/s00441-009-0829-3 DOI:dx. doi.org
6. Bass MD, Morgan MR, Humphries MJ (2009) Syndecans shed their
reputation as inert mole- cules. Sci Signal 2(64): pe18.
doi:10.1126/scisignal.264pe18 DOI:dx.doi.org
7. Lambaerts K, Wilcox-Adelman SA, Zimmermann P (2009) The
signaling mechanisms of syn- decan heparan sulfate proteoglycans.
Curr Opin Cell Biol 21(5):662–669. doi:10.1016/j. ceb.2009.05.002
DOI:dx.doi.org
8. Schmidt S, Friedl P (2010) Interstitial cell migration:
integrin-dependent and alternative adhesion mechanisms. Cell Tissue
Res 339(1):83–92. doi:10.1007/s00441-009-0892-9
DOI:dx.doi.org
9. Streuli CH, Akhtar N (2009) Signal co-operation between
integrins and other receptor sys- tems. Biochem J 418(3):491–506.
doi:10.1042/BJ20081948 DOI:dx.doi.org
10. Gordon MK, Hahn RA (2010) Collagens. Cell Tissue Res
339(1):247–257. doi:10.1007/ s00441-009-0844-4 DOI:dx.doi.org
11. Shoulders MD, Raines RT (2009) Collagen structure and
stability. Annu Rev Biochem 78:929–958.
doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.032207.120833 DOI:dx.doi.org
12. Ramirez F, Sakai LY (2010) Biogenesis and function of fibrillin
assemblies. Cell Tissue Res 339(1):71–82.
doi:10.1007/s00441-009-0822-x DOI:dx.doi.org
13. White ES, Baralle FE, Muro AF (2008) New insights into form and
function of fibronectin splice variants. J Pathol 216(1):1–14.
doi:10.1002/path.2388 DOI:dx.doi.org
14. Leiss M, Beckmann K, Girós A, Costell M, Fässler R (2008) The
role of integrin binding sites in fibronectin matrix assembly in
vivo. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20(5):502–507. doi:10.1016/j.
ceb.2008.06.001 DOI:dx.doi.org
15. Brellier F, Tucker RP, Chiquet-Ehrismann R (2009) Tenascins and
their implications in diseases and tissue mechanics. Scand J Med
Sci Sports 19(4):511–519. doi:10.1111/j. 1600-0838.2009.00916.x
DOI:dx.doi.org
16. Tucker RP, Chiquet-Ehrismann R (2009) The regulation of
tenascin expression by tissue microenvironments. Biochim Biophys
Acta 1793(5):888–892. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.12.012
DOI:dx.doi.org
17. de Vega S, Iwamoto T, Yamada Y (2009) Fibulins: multiple roles
in matrix structures and tissue functions. Cell Mol Life Sci
66(11–12):1890–1902. doi:10.1007/s00018-009-8632-6
DOI:dx.doi.org
18. Hynes RO (2009) The extracellular matrix: not just pretty
fibrils. Science 326 (5957):1216–1219. doi:10.1126/science.1176009
DOI:dx.doi.org
19. Tsang KY, Cheung MC, Chan D, Cheah KS (2010) The developmental
roles of the extracellular matrix: beyond structure to regulation.
Cell Tissue Res 339(1):93–110. doi:10.1007/s00441- 009-0893-8
DOI:dx.doi.org
20. Rozario T, DeSimone DW (2010) The extracellular matrix in
development and morphogenesis: a dynamic view. Dev Biol
341(1):126–140. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.026
DOI:dx.doi.org
21. Sofat N (2009) Analysing the role of endogenous matrix
molecules in the development of osteoarthritis. Int J Exp Pathol
90(5):463–479. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2613.2009.00676.x
DOI:dx.doi.org
22. Järveläinen H, Sainio A, Koulu M, Wight TN, Penttinen R (2009)
Extracellular matrix mole- cules: potential targets in
pharmacotherapy. Pharmacol Rev 61(2):198–223. doi:10.1124/
pr.109.001289 DOI:dx.doi.org
23. Salerno FG, Barbaro MP, Toungoussova O, Carpagnano E, Guido P,
Spanevello A (2009) The extracellular matrix of the lung and airway
responsiveness in asthma. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 71(1):27–30
24. Yurchenco PD, Patton BL (2009) Developmental and pathogenic
mechanisms of basement membrane assembly. Curr Pharm Des
15(12):1277–1294. doi:10.2174/138161209787846766
DOI:dx.doi.org
12 2 The Extracellular Matrix
25. Loeser RF (2009) Aging and osteoarthritis: the role of
chondrocyte senescence and aging changes in the cartilage matrix.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage 17(8):971–979. doi:10.1016/j.
joca.2009.03.002 DOI:dx.doi.org
26. Bateman JF, Boot-Handford RP, Lamandé SR (2009) Genetic
diseases of connective tissues: cellular and extracellular effects
of ECM mutations. Nat Rev Genet 10(3):173–183. doi:10.1038/nrg2520
DOI:dx.doi.org
27. Malfait F, De Paepe A (2009) Bleeding in the heritable
connective tissue disorders: mecha- nisms, diagnosis and treatment.
Blood Rev 23(5):191–197. doi:10.1016/j.blre.2009.06.001
DOI:dx.doi.org
28. Carter EM, Raggio CL (2009) Genetic and orthopedic aspects of
collagen disorders. Curr Opin Pediatr 21(1):46–54.
doi:10.1097/MOP.0b013e32832185c5 DOI:dx.doi.org
29. Maraldi NM, Sabatelli P, Columbaro M, Zamparelli A, Manzoli FA,
Bernardi P, Bonaldo P, Merlini L (2009) Collagen VI myopathies:
from the animal model to the clinical trial. Adv Enzyme Regul
49(1):197–211. doi:10.1016/j.advenzreg.2008.12.009
DOI:dx.doi.org
13Y.A. Rovensky, Adhesive Interactions in Normal and Transformed
Cells, DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-304-2_3, © Springer Science+Business
Media, LLC 2011
Abstract Actin microfilaments, microtubules, and intermediate
filaments are the cytoskeleton systems that play crucial roles in
basic cell functions and behavioral cell responses. Actin
cytoskeleton and microtubules participate cooperatively in the
formation of pseudopodia and adhesive bonds of cells with the
extracellular matrix, thereby determining the capability of the
cells to migration. Both these systems play a key role in cell
shape determination and intercellular adhesion. Microtubules are
critically involved in mitotic cycle. Intermediate filaments carry
out both mechani- cal and some nonmechanical functions in
cells.
The cytoskeleton actively participates in all adhesive
interactions. The cytoskeleton is represented by three types of
intracellular structures: actin
filaments (actin microfilaments), microtubules, and intermediate
filaments (Fig. 3.1). From these structures, the actin cytoskeleton
and the system of microtubules play a key role in adhesive
interactions.
3.1 Actin Filaments
Actin cytoskeleton is the determinant in cell shape and cell
migration; it is critically involved in such basic cellular
functions as adhesion of cells to the extracellular matrix or to
each other, cell proliferation, and survival. Alterations in the
actin cytoskeleton formation, organization, and regulation play a
key role in cancer invasion and metastasis [1–4].
Actin filaments are polymerized from monomeric protein actin. This
protein has a globular form. Globular-actin (G-actin) readily
polymerizes under physiological conditions to form
filamentous-actin (F-actin) with the concomitant hydrolysis of ATP.
Actin monomers are connected with each other and form F-actin
having the appearance of the polymeric double-helical threads with
a diameter of 6–7 nm that are termed actin filaments (actin
microfilaments). The actin polymerization resulting in the
formation of actin filaments strongly needs arginylation of
actin
Chapter 3 Cytoskeleton
14 3 Cytoskeleton
(the transfer of the arginine residue, arginyl, to actin): the
inhibition of actin arginylation significantly decreases the level
of actin polymerization [5].
Actin filaments are very dynamic: the actin monomers in the
cytoplasm constantly join the ends of the filaments faced the cell
membrane (termed barbed, or plus-ends), whereas at the opposite
ends (termed pointed, or minus-ends) the depolymerization of actin
occurs. Thus, filaments possess structural polarity: a lengthening
of the thread occurs from the plus-end, a shortening from the
minus-end of a filament.
There are b- or g-isoforms of cytoplasmic actin in fibroblastic and
epithelial cells. The b-actin filaments are located in the basal
but not in the dorsal portions of cells, and these filaments are
organized in bundles (Fig. 3.1). The b-actin fila- ment bundles are
critically involved in the formation and stability of cell–
extracellular matrix and cell–cell adhesions, and play the main
role in cell contractility. The g-actin filaments in moving cells
are mainly organized as networks, which are located under the
dorsal cell membrane and in the motile cell parts (e.g., in
lamellipodia). In nonmigrating cells g-actin is also recruited into
the filament bundles [6].
Actin filaments are organized differently in fibroblastic and
epithelial cells. Fibroblastic cells have polygonal or elongated
shapes, and they contain in their cytoplasm numerous, predominantly
straight, long actin filaments and filament bundles, which are
oriented mostly along the cell axis (Fig. 3.2). The single epithe-
liocytes acquire discoid shapes, and they have a circular actin
filament bundle located along the entire cell periphery (Fig.
3.3).
Fig. 3.1 Rat fibroblastic cell. The cytoskeleton: actin
microfilament bundle (mf), microtubules (arrows), intermediate
filaments (arrowheads). Electron microscopy (EM). Scale bar, 0.2
mm. Courtesy of T.M. Svitkina, reproduced with permission from the
Journal of Structural Biology, 1995; 115(3):290–303
153.1 Actin Filaments
Fig. 3.2 Human fibroblastic cells. Linear actin microfilaments and
the microfilament bundles (arrow). Staining for actin. Fluorescent
microscopy (FM). Scale bar, 24.5 mm. Courtesy of A.Y.
Alexandrova
Fig. 3.3 Epithelial mouse cell. Circular actin microfilament bundle
(arrow). Staining for actin. FM. Scale bar, 40 mm
16 3 Cytoskeleton
3.1.1 Actin-Binding Proteins
Organization and functioning of actin cytoskeleton are ensured by a
large family of actin-binding proteins that can directly interact
with F- and G-actin. At present, there are over 150 known
actin-binding proteins, which account for approximately 25% of
cellular protein. Actin-binding proteins regulate the processes of
the polymerization– depolymerization of actin filaments, carry out
their nucleating, severing and capping, and also connect the
filaments with each other and give them the contractile proper-
ties. Actin-binding proteins have relatively low affinity for
actin. The weak bonds are necessary for dynamic actin cytoskeleton
remodeling [7].
In the large group of actin-binding proteins, the actin nucleators
play a critical role. These proteins directly nucleate actin
filament formation de novo.
The group of actin nucleators includes the actin-related proteins
(Arp2/3 com- plex) and nucleation-promoting factors (NPF), and also
the proteins Spire, Cordon- bleu (Cobl), Leiomodin (Lmod), and
formins.
Arp2/3 complex. This complex consists of seven proteins, from which
the Arp2 and Arp3 proteins are homologous to actin. Arp2/3 is an
initiator of actin filament nucleation to form branched filament
network [8–14].
The Arp2/3 complex is intrinsically inactive and needs the
activating NPFs, such as WASP/WAVE (also called WASP/Scar) protein
family, WASP homolog-associated protein with actin, membranes and
microtubules (WHAMM), and also junction- mediated regulatory
protein (JMY).
WASP/WAVE (WASP/Scar). Wiscott–Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP)
family includes WASP, N-WASP, and three WASP family
verprolin-homologous (WAVE) proteins. WAVE proteins are also known
as suppressor of cAMP receptor (Scar) proteins. Therefore,
WASP/WAVE is also called WASP/Scar protein family. All WASP family
members have a domain through which Arp2/3 complex is activated to
nucleate actin polymerization resulting in the formation of new
branched actin filaments [8, 13, 15–18].
The functions of WASP and N-WASP in the Arp2/3 complex-mediated
actin nucleation are regulated by the WASP-interacting protein
(WIP) that interacts with WASP and N-WASP [19, 20].
WHAMM. This nucleation promoting factor (NPF) is associated with
actin, mem- branes, and cytoskeleton system of microtubules. WHAMM
activates the Arp2/3- mediated actin nucleation along microtubules
and also at the Golgi apparatus. Thus, WHAMM functions at the
interface of the actin cytoskeleton and microtubules [13].
JMY. It activates the Arp2/3-mediated actin nucleation; however,
JMY can induce actin nucleation in the absence of the Arp2/3
complex.
JMY can function both as an NPF to activate the Arp2/3 complex and
as an actin nucleator, like Spire (see below), that directly
nucleates new actin filaments. Thereby, JMY can induce the
formation of both branched and unbranched actin filaments
[13].
173.1 Actin Filaments
It is interesting that JMY is a transcriptional coactivator of p53
gene and is primarily located in the cell nucleus. However, JMY
shuttles between cell nucleus and the cytoplasm: in highly motile
cells JMY is excluded from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and is
colocalized with actin filaments at the leading edge of the
migrating cell. Increased JMY expression promotes cell
migration.
Spire, Cordon-bleu (Cobl), Leiomodin (Lmod) proteins, and formin
homology pro- teins (formins). These are actin nucleators that
directly nucleate new actin filaments.
Both Spire and Cobl proteins generate nucleation of unbranched
actin filaments and remain bound to the pointed end of the new
emerging filament. Cobl is mainly expressed in the brain. Lmod
isoforms are homologs of tropomodulins that are capping proteins
(see Sect. 3.1.1). Lmod binds the actin-binding protein tropomyosin
(see Sect. 3.1.1) and acts as nucleator of tropomyosin-decorated
actin filaments in muscles [12, 13, 21, 22].
Formins not only directly nucleate new actin filaments but also
protect the fila- ments from their capping, thereby providing the
progressive elongation of the filament barbed ends [13, 14, 23–25]
(see Sect. 3.1.2).
All the above mentioned actin nucleators, except formins, use small
actin-binding WASP-homology 2 domains (WH2 domains) that were first
identified in the WASP/Scar (WASP/WAVE) protein family. WH2 domain
binds actin monomers to directly nucleate actin filaments de novo.
For example, the nucleator Spire brings actin monomers together
with four tandem WH2 domains to form a linear actin tetramer, to
which free monomers then bind. In this way, a new actin filament is
formed and further elongated.
WH2 domain is involved in various functional interactions between
actin monomers and different actin-binding proteins. Owing to the
multifunctional character of the WH2 domains, such actin nucleators
as Spire or Cobl, can not only nucleate actin filaments but also
sever them or cap the filaments at their barbed ends thereby
blocking the barbed end growth [21].
Unlike other actin nucleators, formins use the formin-homology 2
domain (FH2 domain) to interact with G-actin (see Sect.
3.1.2).
Profilin. It binds to actin monomers and stimulates the replacement
of ADP to ATP in them. After the separation of profilin, the
monomers rapidly begin polymer- ization at the barbed ends of the
filaments, resulting in their growth [26]. Profilin interacts with
multiple proteins to regulate actin cytoskeleton dynamics and mem-
brane trafficking [27].
Gelsolin. It is the most potent member of the gelsolin/villin
protein superfamily. Gelsolin regulates both the assembly and
disassembly of actin filaments by their severing, capping filament
ends (preventing the addition or separation of actin monomers), and
actin filament nucleation [28, 29].
Actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF), also called cofilin. This
protein accelerates depolymerization of actin and prevents released
actin monomers from being polymerized again (until the monomers
stay bound with cofilin). Thus, cofilin causes the fragmentation of
actin filaments. Through its actin severing activity,
18 3 Cytoskeleton
cofilin increases the number of free microfilament barbed ends to
initiate actin polymerization in cell protrusions, such as
lamellipodia [29–32].
Cortical actin-binding protein (Cortactin). It facilitates actin
filament branching via the Arp2/3 complex. Cortactin also induces
cross-linking of actin filaments, promoting the formation of the
filament bundles [33–35].
Capping proteins. These proteins are capable of being joined to the
barbed or to the pointed end of the actin filaments, preventing the
addition or separation of actin monomers and thus regulate filament
length. The gelsolin and also protein villin that belongs to the
gelsolin/villin superfamily [36] cause not only calcium-dependent
fragmentation of actin filaments, but also capable of capping the
filament barbed ends. Another family of capping proteins
tropomodulins needs their binding to tropo- myosins (see below) for
the capping function at actin filament pointed ends [37].
Alpha-actinin, filamins, and fimbrins (plastins). The first two
proteins form the flexible connections between the actin filaments.
Because of that, the three- dimensional reticular structure is
created.
Alpha-actinin is an actin cross-binding protein. In nonmuscle
cells, a-actinin is found along actin filaments cross-linking them.
Besides binding to actin, a-actinin associates with some proteins
(such as vinculin, zyxin, and a-catenin) in cell–matrix and in
cell–cell adhesion complexes, organizing actin framework and
linking it to these adhesion complexes [38].
Filamins are a family of three actin-binding and cross-binding
proteins that organize actin filaments in networks and fibers.
Filamin has an actin-binding domain and a rod segment consisting of
up to 24 immunoglobulin-like domains. Two hinges in the rod segment
result in a V-shaped flexible actin-crosslinker molecule that can
generate actin filament networks with the high-angle filament
branching. In addi- tion, filamins can bind many transmembrane cell
receptors and signaling proteins, thereby promoting their
connection to the actin cytoskeleton [39].
Fimbrins (also termed plastins) cause cross-linking of separate
actin filaments into the parallel tight bundles [40].
Fascin. It is the actin cross-linker protein that sews together
actin filaments with their associated barbed ends into the long
bundles. Fascin plays an important role in filopodia
formation.
Girdin (also reported as GIRDers of actin filaments, APE or GIV).
Its alternative names Akt phosphorylation enhancer, Girders of
actin filament. Girdin is required for the formation of actin
filament bundles and lamellipodia and is involved in both
remodeling of actin cytoskeleton and cell motility [41].
The ezrin, radixin, and moezin (ERM) protein family. These proteins
have a plasma membrane-binding domain and an actin-binding one.
Thus, the ERM proteins mediate plasma membrane–actin cytoskeleton
cross-linking. The ERM are involved in cortical actin cytoskeleton
remodeling, cell migration, stabilization of cell–cell adhesions,
and other cell functions [42, 43].
193.1 Actin Filaments
Myosins. The superfamily of myosins includes about 100 members.
Myosins are actin-binding proteins having ATPase activity and
fulfilling motor function. Myosins bind actin filaments and use ATP
hydrolysis to generate force and to move along the fila- ment
toward its barbed end. The myosin VI is an exception: it is a
unique pointed end- directed myosin motor protein [44]. Myosin
molecule has a domain to interact with cargo molecules. Thus,
myosins can transport various membranous organelles along actin
microfilaments that act as “rails.” Normal actin dynamics is a
necessary condition for the myosin-mediated transport of organelles
[45–48]. Myosins play an important role not only as intracellular
cargo transporters but also as determinants of cell contrac- tion
(see below) and are critically involved in cell adhesion and
migration.
Tropomyosins. These proteins are located along the filaments giving
them necessary hardness and stabilizing them. Tropomyosin isoforms
collaboratively interact with dif- ferent actin-binding proteins
including cofilin, gelsolin, tropomodulins, Arp2/3, myosin, and
caldesmon, thereby conferring different properties to the actin
filaments [49, 50].
Caldesmon. It directly interacts with actin as well as with
tropomyosins, thereby being involved in the assembly, dynamics, and
stability of actin filaments. Caldesmon inhibits the ATPase
activity of myosin II, so caldesmon is the negative regulator of
cell contractility [51]. Therefore, caldesmon is involved in actin
cytoskeleton rearrangement, cell motility, cell shape changes, and
exo- or endocytosis.
Among the actin-binding proteins, myosins have a particularly
important role. Interaction of a member of the myosin superfamily,
myosin II, with actin is the basis of muscle contraction. In
nonmuscle cells (e.g., in the fibroblasts) myosin II gives actin
filaments contractile properties [52].
A molecule of myosin II consists of heavy chains (MHC) and light
chains (MLC) and has two “heads” and a “tail.” Phosphorylation of
MLC causes assembly of myosin molecules into short bipolar
aggregates (of 10–20 molecules) (Fig. 3.4). The myosin aggregates
are connected by the “heads” with the lateral sides of two actin
filaments of opposite polarity. The myosin “heads” change their
conformation and thereby exert the pulling influence on the
filaments. As a result, two adjacent filaments slide relative to
each other in opposite directions (Fig. 3.5).
Sliding of the actomyosin filaments relative to each other is the
basis of the actin cytoskeleton contractility. Necessary energy for
these motions is freed owing to the ATP hydrolysis caused by the
ATPase activity of myosin.
The contractility of actomyosin is controlled by regulatory
enzymes. Calcium- dependent myosin light chain kinase (MLC kinase)
phosphorylates MLC, increasing contractility of actomyosin. The
opposite action is achieved by MLC phosphatase. These enzymes, in
turn, are regulated by special proteins from the Rho family of
small GTPases (Rho family of GTPases or Rho GTPases) (see Sect.
5.3.5). The activation of some proteins of the Rho family leads to
the increase in the contractility of the actomyosin. The negative
regulation of the contractility is achieved by the protein
caldesmon, which inhibits ATPase activity of myosin II [51].
The contractility of actin filaments plays a key role in the
formation and mainte- nance of stable cell contacts with the
extracellular matrix, in cell spreading and in cell
locomotion.
20 3 Cytoskeleton
3.1.2 Actin Filament Dynamics
Formation of new actin filaments in the cell proceeds via their
offshoot from the preexisting filaments (Fig. 3.6). The
actin-binding proteins have a critical role in this process.
For the formation of a new filament, the unique “priming” is
necessary. Actin- binding proteins of the Arp 2/3 complex play a
key role in its formation as the initiators
Fig. 3.4 Fibroblastic mouse cell. Individual myosin II
minifilaments have bipolar morphology with globular ends and a bare
central region. EM. Scale bar, 0.1 mm. Courtesy of T.M. Svitkina,
reproduced with permission from the Journal of Structural Biology,
1995; 115(3):290–303
Fig. 3.5 Diagram showing the interaction of myosin II with actin
microfilaments (see the text for explanation)
213.1 Actin Filaments
of actin filament nucleation [8, 9, 11, 17, 18, 30]. The Arp 2/3
complex is intrinsically inactive. It is activated by the WASP/WAVE
(WASP/Scar) [13, 15–18]. The actin- binding protein cortactin binds
to the Arp2/3 complex and recruits it to a preexisting actin
filament [33–35]. WASP/WAVE (WASP/Scar) proteins bring together an
actin monomer and Arp2/3 complex on the lateral side of the
preexisting filament to initiate the formation of a new one [8, 13,
15–18].
After the Arp 2/3 complex attachment to the lateral side of
preexisting filament, the Arp 2/3 changes its configuration and
acquires the ability to join one additional monomer of actin to
itself. So the “priming” is serving for further actin polymer-
ization and for the growth of a new filament, which in the form of
the offshoot goes out from the lateral side of the old filament at
an angle of approximately 70° (Figs. 3.6–3.8). This way, a branched
network of actin filaments is formed in the cell [8, 9, 11, 18, 30,
53].
Another group of actin-binding proteins, formins, mediates linear
growth of actin filaments. Formins directly nucleate the actin
polymerization of linear filaments and mediate their elongation by
a special mechanism [13, 14, 23–25]. Formin can bind in a stepwise
manner to each next attached actin monomer, thereby protecting the
growing barbed end of the filament against its binding to capping
proteins and
Fig. 3.6 Diagram showing the formation of new actin microfilaments
(see the text for explanation)
22 3 Cytoskeleton
Fig. 3.7 Multiple branching of actin filaments. Overview of the
branched filament network (a) and enlargements of the boxed regions
(b–g). EM. Scale bar, 0.3 mm. Courtesy of T.M. Svitkina, reproduced
with permission from the Journal of Cell Biology [30]
233.1 Actin Filaments
initiating the filament elongation. Formin is rapidly translocated
along the filament. One formin domain (formin homology 2 domain,
FH2) initiates actin filament assembly and remains associated with
the barbed end of the filament, providing rapid addition of actin
monomers and protecting the filament end from capping proteins. The
adja- cent formin domain (formin homology 1 domain, FH1) influences
the FH2 domain function through binding to the actin
monomer-binding protein profilin, thereby promoting filament
elongation.
The growth of actin filaments discontinues because of the capping
of their barbed ends. Pointed ends are released and the
depolymerization of actin begins at these sites. The filaments are
disassembled to separate ADP-containing actin monomers. The binding
with cofilin contributes to the filament disassembly (Fig. 3.6)
[29–32].
Fig. 3.8 Localization of Arp2/3 complex at actin branching points.
The Arp2/3 complex is immu- nostained using 10-nm gold-conjugated
antibody. Gold particles are highlighted in yellow. EM. Scale bar,
40 nm. Courtesy of T.M. Svitkina, reproduced with permission from
the Journal of Cell Biology [30]
24 3 Cytoskeleton
After the replacement of ADP for ATP (this replacement is catalyzed
by the actin-binding protein profilin), actin monomers are newly
prepared to enter the polymerization reaction [26].
There are retrograde and anterograde flows of actin filaments in a
cell. The fila- ments are polymerized from actin monomers at the
active cell edge, namely at the free edge of lamellar cytoplasm
where pseudopodia are formed (see Sect. 4.1). From there, the
filaments start to move rapidly backward. These rapidly moving
actin filaments are not associated with myosin II molecules. When
the filaments appear to be in the more proximal zone of lamellar
cytoplasm, their retrograde movement becomes much slower, and the
filaments form regular bundles. In these bundles, the actin gets
associated with myosin II and with certain other actin-binding
proteins. In the course of the retrograde flow, part of filaments
is gradually “disbranched” and depolymerized; the depolymerization
is promoted by cofilin. The retrograde flow stops in the
convergence zone between the lamellar cytoplasm and the central
part of the cell. Forming actin monomers rapidly flow anterogradely
back to the active cell edge for their repolymerization [1].
The formation and the organization of actin cytoskeleton are
controlled by the Rho family of GTPases, Rho GTPases. These
proteins control the polymerization of actin, assembly and
stabilization of actin filaments, their contractility, and their
organization [1] (see Sect. 5.3.5).
The actin cytoskeleton dynamics can influence gene activity. In the
process of actin polymerization, the transcriptional coactivators
termed myocardin-related transcription factors (MRTFs) are
liberated. They are involved in the activation of the expression of
many genes, including those regulating actin cytoskeletal organi-
zation and cell growth [54].
Actin cytoskeleton plays a key role in: (a) the formation of
pseudopodia that are cellular outgrowths, which are necessary for
cell spreading and movement; (b) formation of special adhesive
structures – the molecular complexes, which ensure the attachment
of cells to the extracellular matrix; (c) the formation of stable
intercellular contacts.
3.2 Microtubules
The cytoskeletal system of microtubules, just as actin
cytoskeleton, plays a key role in cell shape determination, cell
migration, and intercellular and cell–matrix adhesion. Microtubules
are involved in the formation of mitotic spindle, the struc- ture
used by cells to segregate their chromosomes during cell division.
Microtubules, like actin filaments, critically contribute to the
specific behavior of cancer cells [3].
Microtubules are self-assembling straight hollow cylinders 25 nm in
diameter, variable in length; they are built from ab-tubulin
heterodimers (Fig. 3.9). Microtubules have outstanding mechanical
properties combining high resilience and stiffness [55].
The ab-tubulin heterodimers are joined end-to-end to form
protofilaments with alternating a and b subunits. Therefore, in a
protofilament, one end (designated
253.2 Microtubules
minus-end) has the a-tubulin exposed, while the other end
(designated plus-end) has the b-tubulin exposed. The protofilaments
then associate parallel to one another to eventually form hollow
cylindrical microtubules.
Thus, a microtubule has one end (plus-end) with only b-tubulin
exposed and another end (minus-end) with only a-tubulin exposed.
This structural polarity of microtubules is a very important
feature playing a pivotal role in their dynamics and functions
[56].
In contrast to actin filaments, the system of microtubules in a
cell is centralized: they are nucleated and radiate into the
peripheral cytoplasm (Fig. 3.10) from a spe- cific place, called
the microtubule-organizing center (MTOC), or centrosome. In the
interphase cell, the MTOC is located near the nucleus and surrounds
centrioles that are cylindrical structures, usually in pairs,
oriented at right angles to one another, formed by nine triplets of
microtubules.
Proteins that are present in the MTOC or at the surfaces of
centrioles include g-tubulin. This tubulin, which is homologous to
a- and b-tubulins, combines with several associated proteins to
form a circular structure called the g-tubulin ring complex. It
acts as a scaffold for ab-tubulin heterodimers to initiate
polymerization [55–58].
Microtubules nucleated by the g-tubulin ring complex are capped at
their minus- ends, and the polymerization at these ends is
inhibited [56]. Centrioles, similar to chromosomes, can double and
serve as the centers of initiation of microtubules of the mitotic
spindle.
Therefore, minus-ends of most microtubules are anchored to the
MTOC; the growth of the microtubules continues away from the MTOC
in the plus-end direction up to the approximation of the distal
plus-ends to the cell edges.
Fig. 3.9 Epithelial monkey cell. Microtubules that are immunogold
labeled with detyrosinated tubulin. Gold-labeling microtubules
(arrows). EM. Scale bar, 0.2 mm. Courtesy of T.M. Svitkina,
reproduced with permission from the Journal of Structural Biology,
1995; 115(3):290–303
26 3 Cytoskeleton
The assembly of microtubules from tubulin molecules is similar to
the assembly of microfilaments from actin: like actin filaments
that exchange actin monomers with dissolved cytoplasmic actin,
microtubules exchange ab-tubulin heterodimers with cytoplasmic
tubulin.
With the minus-ends anchored to the MTOC, microtubules grow or
shorten through addition or loss of tubulin heterodimers at the
plus-ends. Therefore, microtubules may grow steadily and then
shorten (shrink) rapidly. The random transitions from their growth
(caused by tubulin polymerization) to the shrinkage (caused by
tubulin depolymerization) are called microtubule catastrophes; the
transitions from the shrinkage to the growth are called rescues.
Thus, microtubules oscillate between their growth and shrinkage.
Such behavior is termed dynamic instability [56].
Dynamic instability of microtubules is determined by GTP
hydrolysis. A molecule of GTP is bound to both a and b subunit of a
tubulin heterodimer; however, only GTP bound to b-tubulin may be
hydrolyzed to GDP. During polymerization, a subunit of a tubulin
heterodimer from the cytoplasmic pool of tubulin comes into contact
with the b-tubulin exposed at the microtubule plus-end. This
promotes hydrolysis of GTP bound to the now interior b-tubulin. The
GTP hydrolysis causes the tubulin depolymerization leading to the
microtubule shrinkage.
Until the GTP that is associated with b-tubulin at the microtubule
plus-end is not hydrolyzed, tubulin continues to polymerize: the
tubulin heterodimers are added faster than the GTP can be
hydrolyzed. As a result, the microtubule grows. A rapidly growing
microtubule may accumulate a few layers of GTP-bound tubulin at the
plus-end. A GTP cap stabilizes the plus-end of a microtubule
preventing its depo- lymerization. However, when the GTP has
already hydrolyzed before a new tubulin heterodimer was
incorporated, the intense tubulin depolymerization begins leading
to the microtubule shrinkage.
Fig. 3.10 Fibroblastic rat cells. Microtubules (arrow). Staining
for tubulin. FM. Scale bar, 25 mm. Courtesy of S.N. Rubtsova
273.2 Microtubules
Microtubules can be released from the centrosome; besides, long
microtubules can break. As a result of that, a subpopulation of
microtubules with free minus-ends can be found in some cells. These
microtubules have the stable minus-ends unlike the plus-ends that
show the dynamic instability [59]. On the released g-tubulin
“primings,” the nucleation and growth of new microtubules can be
initiated.
In addition to the centrosome, the Golgi complex is a
microtubule-organizing organelle. A large number of microtubules
originate from the Golgi apparatus at its peripheral compartment;
the Golgi membranes can directly stimulate the assembly of
microtubules. Both centrosomal and Golgi-derived microtubules need
g-tubulin for nucleation. In contrast to the high level of dynamics
of centrosomal microtu- bules, the Golgi-based microtubules are
stabilized early. Also, the Golgi-derived microtubules, in contrast
to radial centrosomal microtubule arrays, are preferentially
oriented toward the leading edge in polarized moving cells
[60–62].
The dynamic instability of microtubules (the regime of their
polymerization– depolymerization) is regulated by multiple
microtubule-associated proteins. They include motor proteins and
nonmotor proteins.
3.2.1 Motor Proteins
The most prominent function of microtubules is an intracellular
transport. It requires microtubule-associated molecular motors [45,
63].
Microtubule motor proteins are kinesins and dynein. There is also
another motor protein, Eg5, that is active in mitotic spindle
assembly.
Kinesins and dynein are ATPases, which convert the chemical energy
contained in ATP into the mechanical force used for their active
movement along microtubules. The motor proteins directionally
transport various membrane vesicles, organelles, proteins, and
mRNAs by “walking” along microtubules. The molecule of the motor
protein is fastened by its one end to the lateral side of
microtubule, and by its other end to the “cargo” that needs to be
transported, e.g., a specific molecule, an organelle, or an
adjacent microtubule. This is similar to myosin connected with
actin; the motor protein (in the presence of ATP) develops pulling
action, which causes the displacement of the “cargo” along the
microtubule or the mutual slip of micro- tubules relative to each
other. The motor protein determines the direction of motion:
kinesins transport various “cargos” toward the plus-ends of
microtubules, while dynein moves toward their minus-ends. The
example of the microtubule-based intracellular transport is the
rapid transport of vesicles and mitochondria along the axons of
neurons [45, 63–68].
Besides the transport function, some motor proteins can also
directly influence the polymerization dynamics of microtubules and
regulate their lengths. For example, some kinesins accelerate
depolymerization of microtubules inducing their shortening [69,
70].
However, the microtubules themselves, in the absence of the
microtubule-associated motor proteins, can also move some
intracellular organelles. The growth and shrinkage of microtubules
attached with their plus-ends to the organelles generate
forces
28 3 Cytoskeleton
that can push and pull these organelles. For example, the
microtubules attached to chromosomes (via the kinetochore) cause
the movement of the chromosomes during metaphase and anaphase of
mitosis.
3.2.2 Nonmotor Proteins
the plus-ends of growing microtubules. +TIPs act as
microtubule-stabilizing factors. Besides, they mediate the
interactions between microtubule ends and actin cytoskel- eton, and
participate in intracellular transport [71, 72].
Moreover, +TIP group includes the end-binding protein1 (EB1) that
stimulates spontaneous nucleation and growth of microtubules
[73].
EB1 binds to another member of the +TIP’s group, the adenomatous
polyposis coli (APC) protein that is product of a tumor suppressor
gene. APC participates in many cellular processes [74]. It has
multiple domains, through which APC binds to various proteins. APC
interacts with microtubules and accumulates at the plus-ends of
microtubules in cell protrusions. APC may regulate the
polymerization dynamics of these microtubules: APC-decorated
microtubules have an increased phase of their growth compared with
microtubules that are not decorated by APC. Increased time of
growth of microtubules mediated by APC in cell protrusions plays a
significant role in directional cell migration [75–78].
A microtubule-associated protein, XMAP215, moves with growing
microtubule plus-ends, where it catalyzes the addition of tubulin
subunits [70].
Septins are proteins that are colocalized with microtubules and
probably play an important role in microtubule dynamics regulation
by interacting with microtubule- associated proteins. Septins can
be associated with both microtubules and actin filaments to link
these cytoskeleton systems. Septins polymerize to form filaments
approximately 8 nm in thickness that can assemble along actin
bundles [79].
Posttranslational tubulin modifications influence motor- and
nonmotor microtubule- associated proteins; thereby, tubulin
modifications are involved in the regulation of microtubule
dynamics [80].
The dynamic instability of microtubules (the regime of their
assembly- depolymerization) is a necessary condition for normal
functioning of cells.
The inhibition of the microtubule dynamic instability by special
agents leads to cell cycle arrest. Some plant poisons, e.g.,
colchicines or colcemide, while being joined to the monomers of
tubulin, prevent its polymerization and block the growth of
microtubules. Since in this case the depolymerization continues,
microtubules are gradually destroyed, including microtubules of
mitotic spindle, which stops cell division at the stage of mitosis.
The antitumor plant alkaloids vincristine and vinblastine
293.3 Intermediate Filaments
possess an analogous mechanism of action. Another plant agent,
taxol, on the contrary, does not suppress, but activates the
polymerization of tubulin, preventing the depo- lymerization of
microtubules: they become stable, and do not get short. However,
this stabilization also stops the division of a cell at the stage
of mitosis. Many of such microtubule-targeting agents (vincristine,
vinblastine, taxol, and others) are used in cancer chemotherapy
[81–83].
Intracellular microtubule-based transport of organelles and
molecules is neces- sary for the maintenance of asymmetric
polarized cell morphology (cell polariza- tion) and cell migration
(see Sect. 6.1.2) [1, 84, 85]. The transported molecules include
those locally inhibiting cell contractility, thereby promoting the
disassembly of the individual cell–extracellular matrix adhesions
(see Sect. 4.2.1) [86]. The proteins that regulate actin
cytoskeleton can also be transported by microtu- bules
[86–89].
Therefore, microtubules take part in the regulation of cell
contractility, actin cytoskel- eton remodeling, cell–extracellular
matrix adhesion dynamics, and cell migration.
Actin cytoskeleton and the system of microtubules work
coordinately. The mechanical and regulatory connections between
these two cytoskeletal systems contribute to this coordination.
Transverse mechanical connections between actin filaments and
microtubules are mediated by several types of cross-linking
proteins. The Rho family of GTPases regulates dynamics and
organization not only of the actin cytoskeleton but also of
microtubules (see Sect. 5.3.5).
Both cytoskeletal systems participate cooperatively in the
formation of pseudo- podia and in the assembly and functioning of
special adhesive structures, which connect the cell with the
extracellular matrix, determining the capability of cells to active
movement – cell migration.
3.3 Intermediate Filaments
Intermediate filaments (IFs) are proteinaceous fibrillar structures
intermediate in their widths (8–12 nm) between actin filaments and
microtubules (Fig. 3.1). Unlike those cytoskeleton elements, IFs
are flexible and have a unique ability to withstand substantial
deformations: single IFs can stretch to more than 3 times their
initial length before breaking [90–92].
IFs are composed of a variety of tissue-specific protei