Upload
branden-bishop
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Action Research and Scholarship of Learning and Teaching
c. Neil Haigh, EdQuest
Territory
• Who should I be: excellent teacher, scholarly teacher,
a scholar of teaching?
• Researching Learning and Teaching
• Action Research
• Conceptualizing an Action Research Project
Vla ska
a
Sp o rts Pa rk
Tuska na c Pa rk
C o n cer t & C o n g ress H a ll
R a il S ta tio n
U S C on su la te
C a th ed ra l
Z a g reb U n iv ersity
N a tio n a l T h ea tre
C ro a tia n P a r lia m en t
B o ta n ic G a rd en s Z a g reb S ta d iu m
A rch b ish o p 's P a la ce
N a tu ra l H isto ry M u seu m
M u seu m o f R ev o lu tio n
S to ck E x ch a n g e
A rt P a v illion
N
0
0
500 m
1500 ft I9 9 2 M A G E L L A N G eo g rap h ix S M S an ta B a rba ra , C A (80 0 ) 9 2 9 -4 6 2 7
Z A G R E B
An Excellent Teacher
Engages in practices that experienced and thoughtful teachers know make ‘the odds’ high for successful student learning and have sound knowledge of their discipline, subject, profession.
Relies on knowledge that they have acquired by reflecting on their own experiences and by using similar knowledge developed and shared by their colleagues.
personal practical knowledge
A Scholarly Teacher
Applies thought processes and values associated with scholarship to their teaching (e.g. reflection, evidence-gathering, critique, evaluation, rigour, open-mindedness, intellectual curiosity, scepticism)
and
draws on research based knowledge sourced from literature on learning and teaching.
A Scholar of Teaching and Learning
…. seek to understand teaching by consulting and using the
literature on teaching and learning, by investigating their own
teaching, by reflecting on their teaching from the perspective
of their intention in teaching while seeing it from the students’
position, and by formally communicating their ideas and
practice to their peers. (p164)
Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., and Prosser, M (1999)
The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
(SOTL)
The scholarship of teaching is problem posing about an
issue of teaching or learning, study of the problem
through methods appropriate to disciplinary
epistemologies, application of results to practice,
communication of results, self-reflection and peer review
Carnegie Foundation: Carnegie Teaching Academy
Know the history?
Lawrence Stenhouse (UK)(1975) Teacher as researcher
It is not enough that teachers’ work should be studied: they need to study it themselves.
• commitment to systematic questioning of one's own teaching as a basis for development;
• commitment and the skills to study one's own teaching;• concern to question and to test theory in practice by the use of
those skills;• readiness to allow others to observe your work and to discuss it
with them on an honest, open basis• systematic enquiry made public
Scholarship
For an activity to be designated as scholarship, it should
manifest at least three key characteristics: it should be
public,
susceptible to critical review and evaluation,
and
accessible for exchange and use by other member’s of one’s scholarly community
Shulman, 1998
A Scholar of Teaching – John Scott
• 1988 - 2005• workshops – including student-centred learning,
self-directed student learning, experential learning• observation and assisted reflection • visits, reading, conversations, two major initiatives that
involved engaging in scholarship, • continuing explorations; investigations; sharing, including
through publications
John’s Continuing Innovation, Investigation and (Published) Scholarship
1997 - Teaching Management Science 1997 - How do our students learn?1997 - Reflections on student-centered learning in a large class setting1998 - Independent Learning and Operational Research in the Classroom1998 - Independent learning and operational research in the classroom1999 - Through the education looking glass – a future for OR1999 - Towards understanding student learning in a ‘Management Systems’ environment2000 – How do our students actually learn – how can we find out more?2001 – Education and a future for OR – a viewpoint2002 - Stimulating awareness of actual learning processes
John’s Continuing Innovation, Investigation and (Published) Scholarship
2003 - The use of a special tutorial group to help with course direction
2004 - A spreadsheet based simulator for experential learning in production management
2005 – Reflection as a process: its place and potential in OR/MS education
2006 - Developing the reflective practitioner – Designing an undergraduate class
2007 – Qualitative system dynamics – where have we been; where might we go?
2006 – Determinants of successful vendor managed inventory relationships in oligopoly industries
2005 – Sustaining second-order change initiation: Structured complexity and interface management
Researching Learning and Teaching
• Keep in mind - realities of learning and teaching situations. Factors influencing teacher and student learning
– numerous– simultaneity– complex interactions– often unknown, unpredictable– often uncontrollable– probabilistic relationships (raise or lower the odds)
no certainties – no recipes
• Learning and teaching phenomena are complex – (not just complicated)
But what about…But what about … But …..?
Realities
Our data is saying that it is very difficult to see direct connections …. We know when things go wrong, but it is not necessarily obvious what is happening when things go well. (Action Researcher)
Complexity abounds in teaching and learning situations and it is often a coming together in harmony of many, many aspects and elements that make up the context that results in positive learning and experience outcomes. (Action Researcher)
…the main problem is that individual teachers have limited “elbow room” to make changes in their teaching. The departmental, disciplinary and institutional context constrains practices (Trowler and Bamber, 2005, p.87)
Consider ‘complexity theory’.
Complexity Theory Premises
• instability and non-linearity in relationships
• emergence of unpredictable phenomena
• it is difficult to identify boundaries.
Complexity Theory – cont.
the butterfly effect
My Experience – Yours?
Action Research
You just do something. See how it goes and adapt and change (Lindsay, 2006)
Action research is a term which refers to a practical way of looking at your own work to
check that it is as you would like it to be. Because action research is done by you, the
practitioner, it is often referred to as practitioner based research; and because it
involves you thinking about and reflecting on your work, it can also be called a form of
self-reflective practice. (Jean McNiff, 2002)
Action Research
It's a natural way of acting and researching at the same time.
With the exception of well-practised tasks there is a natural rhythm to the way most of
us behave. We do something. We check if it worked as expected. If it didn't, we
analyse what happened and what we might do differently. If necessary we repeat the
process. (Bob Dick, 2002)
Action Research
• Can be associated with different paradigms – ontology, epistemology, methodology
• Aim may be practical – improve practice + enhance practitioner understanding and development.
• And/or emancipatory – identify factors which impede desirable L&T practices.
• Accommodates research methodologies and methods relevant to the research question.
• Involves succession of cycles - “hunches” are tried & checked out / confirmed – revised / tried & check out
• Concern to maintain authenticity and integrity of the teaching and students’ learning.
Action Research: Resources
Jean McNiff's Handbook on Action Research at http://www.jeanmcniff.com/ar-booklet.asp See examples of Jean’s students’ AR projectshttp://www.jeanmcniff.com/theses.asp
Comprehensive site on action research is maintained by Bob Dick Southern Cross University, Australiahttp://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arhome.html
Conceptualizing an Action Research Project
Jean McNiff
• What issue am I interested in researching?• Why do I want to research this issue?• What kind of evidence can I gather to show why I am interested in this issue?• What can I do? What will I do?• What kind of evidence can I gather to show that I am having an influence?• How can I explain that influence?• How can I ensure that any judgements I might make are reasonably fair and accurate?• How will I change my practice in the light of my evaluation?
Conceptualizing an Action Research Project
identifying
a topic
a thesis
a question
and
establishing a case
if case established
designing
doing
reporting