Upload
scott-french
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Action PlanningAssess, Plan and Perform
Melissa SpearsBusiness Advisory Services
Action Planning is a Plan with Purpose
The Action Plan engagement enables executive leaders at colleges and universities to better
achieve specific institutional goals and objectives by aligning technology with the
institution’s strategic vision.
Reactive Tactical Strategic Transformational
Current State
Goal
TimeTime
Time
Progress in Technology
Implem
entatio
n
Advancing Technology & Training
Institution Technology & Training Co
mp
ou
nd
ed L
oss
Time
The Process
Assess• Review Strategic Plan
• Web-based Surveys
• Interview Business Unit Leaders
Organize• Identify Business Needs
• Map to Strategic Plan
• Compile Effort/Cost
Prioritize• Potential Impacts
• Cost/Benefits
• Quantification
Implement• Complete Tasks
• Measure Results
Institutional Effectiveness
Analysis
Information Gathering Process
Information Gathering Process
Results, Findings and Recommendations
UNIVERSITY GOALS ELLUCIAN RECOMMENDATIONSATTRACT, ENROLL, RETAIN, AND GRADUATE EVEN MORE HIGHLY COMPETENT UNDERGRADUATE, GRADUATE, AND PROFESSIONAL STUDENTS
PRIORITY 1.3
Strengthen the advising programExtend use of program planning and degree audit to empower advisors and students to access information and evaluate progress toward degree utilizing online tools and services.
PRIORITY 1.6
Expand opportunities for student and family communications
Update configuration of the portal and extend utilization of current system functionality to automate notices and alerts to students.
PRIORITY 1.8
Improve student life, retention, and servicesIncrease self service offerings aimed at engaging students utilizing the portal.
MAINTAIN AND STRENGTHEN THE UNIVERSITY’S ACADEMIC PROGRAMS
PRIORITY 2.3
Develop and implement a comprehensive graduation enhancement program in order to improve retention and graduation rates
Include extended utilization of degree audit, program planning, and student engagement via the portal in the overall graduation enhancement program.
FURTHER ENHANCE AND DEVELOP OUTSTANDING FACILITIES
PRIORITY 4.4
Continue to upgrade technological infrastructure to meet academic and university needs
Upgrade solutions to the latest version allowing for enhanced utilization of functionality and technology advancements and extend system training offerings to better utilize resources. Improve reporting capabilities to provide management and staff access to data for information driven decision making.
Decision Making Criteria
This chart represents the criteria we use when making recommendations.
Everything that we recommend aligns with one of these objectives or it’s not recommended.
We ask…does the solution?•Increase Service•Decrease Cost(s)•Increase Revenue•Increase Productivity
Example: Based on the findings Ellucian recommends the following optimization timeline to support these projects. This timeline is a living, breathing document, and the project manager will work closely with all key stakeholders and leadership to
adjust as necessary to ensure institutional success.
Timeline for Action
Start• Executive Sponsors connect
with Business Advisor• Set dates for assessment
activities
Week 3• Confirm onsite agenda• Launch online survey for
stakeholders
Week 5• Close online survey• Confirm logistics for onsite
visit
Week 7• Conduct onsite discovery
with stakeholders• Meet onsite with Executive
Sponsors
Week 8• Business Advisor contacts
Executive Sponsors to review high level findings
Weeks 9-12• Finalize Action Plan
Recommendations• Confirm date and time for
onsite executive presentation• Onsite executive
presentation• Discussion of next steps for
Action Plan launch
Action Plan Engagement Timeline
“If the Action Planning process had not been adopted by the college, they would
not have been able to handle the increased capacity due to the substantial
enrollment increase.”
Dr. Marion Paden, VP of Enrollment Management
Oklahoma City Community College
Is Action Planning right for your campus?
Does your institution utilize your strategic plan to drive business decisions?
Is technology considered as a primary contributor to achieving institutional strategic initiatives?
How long has it been since you conducted a comprehensive assessment of your administrative systems?
Considering higher education best practices and functionality that exists in your administrative system, would you rate the current level of utilization as low, medium, or high by users?
Q&A Discussion