Action 2020Climate

Dialogue

11 November,2015 Beijing,China

wbcsd

1.Agenda

2

Action2020 Climate Dialogue11 November 2015, Kempinski Hotel Beijing, China

09:00 - 10:00 Welcome Plenary

§Mr. Peter WHITE, Chief Operating Officer, World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)

§Mr. Zhaoli JIANG, Deputy Director General, Department of Climate Change, National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC)

§Mr. Qi ZHAI, Executive Secretary General, China Business Council for Sustainable Development (BCSD)

§Ms. Laurence TUBIANA, Special Representative, 2015 Paris Climate Conference (video message)

10:00 - 10:20Keynote Speech: The Construction of National Carbon Market and Interpretation of Key Industry Benchmarks

§Dr. Kejun JIANG, Research fellow, Energy Research Institute, NDRC

10:20 - 10:40 Tea Break

10:40 - 11:20 Themed Speeches: Creating an Enabling Environment for Low Carbon Technologies & Economies

§Carbon PricingDr. Guoqiang QIAN, General Strategic Director, Sino Carbon Innovation & Investment Co.

§Climate BondsMr. Sean KIDNEY, CEO and Co-Founder, Climate Bonds Initiative

11:20 - 12:00Low Carbon Technology Partnership initiative Presentations (I)

§CementTo achieve emission reduction goals of the cement industry by 2030, LCTPi on Cement will focus on four areas: clean cement manufacturing process; the collection, availability and usage of alternative fuels and raw materials; new cement with lower energy; carbon price and carbon trading.

• Mr. Philippe FONTA, Managing Director, Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI), WBCSD• Mr. Xiangzhong KONG, Vice-Chairman and Secretary General, China Cement Association (CCA)• General discussion

12:00 - 13:30 Networking Lunch

13:30 - 14:50Low Carbon Technology Partnership initiative Presentations (II)

§Renewable EnergyThe Scaling Up Renewables LCTPi will bring together world leading energy companies and institutions in order to increase the proportion of renewable in the energy mix, ensure energy projects the access to finance, remove technical and business barriers for developing renewables, and reduce carbon emissions for energy companies.

• Dr. Jeanne Ng, Director, Group Sustainability, CLP Power Hong Kong Limited• Mr. Weidong ZHANG, Director, Department of Planning & Statistics, China Electricity Council• General discussion

§Energy Efficiency in Buildings LCTPi Energy Efficiency in Buildings will call for local and international institutions to build a network of cooperation, provide the necessary frameworks and tools, and engage local building stakeholders in dialogue towards delivering concrete actions that address locally relevant market barriers that withhold projected potential energy savings in buildings.

• Mr. Murilo BONILHA, General Manager, United Technologies Research Center (China) Ltd • Mr. Peng LIU, Director General, Architecture Design General Institute Green Building Design & Research Centre, CADREG• Ms. Jing LIU, Associate Professor, Beijing Jiaotong University• General discussion

14:50 - 15:00 Tea Break

4

15:00 - 15:50Low Carbon Technology Partnership initiative Presentations (III)

§ChemicalsThe chemical industry plays a key role on the game-changing path towards a sustainable future. As an industry of industries, the chemical sector can foster the deployment of breakthrough technologies and solutions that have the potential to lower the carbon footprint of the world. LCTPi Chemicals will outline identified barriers and actions for delivering effective solutions across key value chains, and the role breakthrough technologies can have in lowering the carbon footprint of the industry.

• Mr. Eric MASANET, Head, Energy Demand Technology Unit, International Energy Agency (IEA)• Mr. Yongliang LI, Director, Industrial and Developing Department, China Petroleum and Chemical Industry Federation (CPCIF)• General discussion

15:50 - 16:00 Closing Plenary & Next Steps

§Mr. Philippe FONTA, Managing Director, WBCSD-CSI

§Mr. Qi ZHAI, Executive Secretary General, China BCSD

2.About LCTPi

6

About the LCTPi1.1. The UN climate talks in Paris provide a key moment for business to support climate action

The United Nations climate talks in Paris in December at COP21* , where governments aim to adopt a global climate agreement, are a key moment for all stakeholders to contribute to serious climate action. Many solutions to climate change require existing technologies to be made available at scale or new technologies to be developed. To achieve this, the WBCSD is trying to help remove the barriers that are preventing existing technologies from being deployed at scale, and help companies to develop new technologies that will benefit multiple climate solutions.

1.2. The LCTPi brings together companies to limit global warming to 2 degrees

Launched at the COP20 climate talks in 2014, the LCTPi aims to present a series of concrete action plans at COP21 for the large-scale development and deployment of low-carbon technologies. It brings together the WBCSD’s Action 2020 Business Solutions, the SDSN’s Deep Decarbonisation Pathways and the IEA’s Technology Roadmaps to:

• Accelerate the diffusion of existing technologies by removing technological, market and social barriers and introducing required policy and financial instruments, and• Develop public-private partnerships on the research, development, demonstration and deployment (RDD&D) of potentially new low carbon technologies.

It is supported by the French Presidency of COP21 and is part of the Lima-Paris Action Agenda. Overall, the LCTPi seeks to create a solid framework for low carbon investment through a strengthened dialogue between business and government.

1.3. Under the LCTPi, businesses have been developing ways to help boost deployment of low carbon technology

*This is the 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) – also known as COP21.

7

Through the nine focus areas of the LCTPi, businesses have been developing plans to catalyse the research, development, demonstration and deployment (RDD&D) of low carbon technologies across the key areas of the economy that must be decarbonized if society is to limit climate change to below two degrees. These focus areas and their contribution to RDD&D are summarized in Table 1. The LCTPi ambition depends on deploying at scale the low carbon technologies that already exist. The working groups hope to back this up with strategic research, development and demonstration to provide a pipeline of commercially viable technologies ready to deploy in the next 15 years.

Table 1: LCTPi focus areas and contribution to RDD&D

Mitigation sector LCTPi focus area(s)

Contribution of working group to research, development, demonstration and deployment of low carbon technologies

Research Development Demonstration Deployment

EnergyRenewables √Carbon Capture and Storage √ √ √ √

Industry and materials

Chemicals √ √ √ √Cement √ √ √ √

Buildings Energy Efficiency in Buildings √

Transport

Low Carbon Transport Fuels √ √ √Low Carbon Freight Transport √ √ √

Landscapes

Climate Smart Agriculture √Forests and Forest Products as Carbon Sinks

√ √ √Source: PwC analysis

China

11 Nov

South A

frica3 &

4 S

ept

Create am

bitious solutions

Apr 2015

WB

CSD

Meeting

Montreux

India14 S

ept

Develop action plans that rem

ove barriers &

build partnerships

Test actions in regional dialogues and with policy

makers

Implem

ent beyond P

aris

25 Sept

LCTPi

Roundtable III

NY

C

JapanC

EO

dialogu

e6 O

ct

Agree on am

bition

May 2015LC

TPi R

oundtable IIP

aris

JapanIC

EF7 &

8 O

ct

LCTPitim

eline

3 Nov

LCTPi

Roundtable

IV(C

o-leads only)

London

Dec

2015C

OP21

Paris

Final m

essages

Brazil

7 & 8

Oct

Finalise action plans

Positive stories of action

Key

comm

unications Jan to M

ar 2016

Developm

ent of sector/value chain action plan

Developm

ent of company contributions to

support sector/value-chain action plan

Th

e L

CT

Pic

ould

cu

t em

issi

ons

by 1

7-18

GtC

O2e

/yea

r by

20

30 v

ersu

s bu

sin

ess-

as-

usu

al

Wor

ld B

usin

ess

Cou

ncil

for S

usta

inab

le D

evel

opm

ent

Nov

embe

r 201

5

Sou

rce:

IPC

C; L

CTP

iwor

king

gro

ups;

Pw

C a

naly

sis.

Dia

gram

bas

ed o

n m

edia

n em

issi

ons

gap

in 2

030.

Frei

ght i

s no

t inc

lude

d in

our

ana

lysi

s du

e to

cur

rent

leve

l of d

ata

mat

urity

.

PwC

LC

TPi I

mpa

ct E

mis

sion

Red

uctio

n

3.LCTPi Working Group

12

LCTPi on Cement is a group open to the whole cement sector that support the accelerated deployment of the solutions developed by the Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI) and a broad implementation worldwide.

The cement industry believes it is essential to:• measure CO2 emissions from the cement sector and monitor their evolution;• identify existing and new technologies that help to reduce emissions through specific roadmaps; and• promote cross-industry collaboration.

A shared statement of ambition has been established, by which CO2 emissions should be reduced in the range of 20 to 25% by 2030 compared to business as usual, an average emission rate equivalent to the e missions of the best-in-class CSI company 2020 targets. To move forward towards the above statement of ambition, we have to identify local solutions, barriers and policy asks. Action to address key barriers include:

• Enhancing energy efficiency and clean cement manufacturing process.• Scaling-up the collection, availability and usage of alternative fuels and raw materials, including waste from other sectors in a circular economy concept.• Further reducing the clinker content in cement to minimize the share of the energy-intensive part of the process and developing new cement with lower energy and calcination requirements.• Carbon price and carbon trading.

Cem

ent

Cement

A W

BC

SD-le

d m

ovem

enta

s th

e vo

ice

of b

usin

ess

on s

usta

inab

ility

issu

es•

Bui

ldin

g up

tow

ards

the

UN

FCC

C C

OP2

1 m

eetin

g in

Par

is (D

ec 2

015)

•E

labo

ratin

g se

ctor

alst

atem

ent o

f am

bitio

n an

d an

act

ion

plan

of t

echn

ical

sol

utio

ns to

redu

ce C

O2

emis

sion

s th

roug

h pa

rtner

ship

s•

The

CSI

is c

oord

inat

ing

inpu

t fro

m th

e ce

men

t sec

tor

Low

Car

bon

Tech

nolo

gy P

artn

ersh

ip in

itiat

ives

(LC

TPi)

–C

emen

t

Ambi

tion:

Sca

le u

p em

issi

on re

duct

ion

in th

e ra

nge

of 2

0 to

25%

CO

2in

203

0 co

mpa

red

to b

usin

ess

as u

sual

Key

partn

ers:

Inte

rnat

iona

l Ene

rgy A

genc

y (IE

A), I

nter

natio

nal F

inan

ce C

orpo

ratio

n (IF

C),

natio

nal t

rade

ass

ocia

tions

Sca

ling

up c

over

age

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

th

e C

SI to

ols

(GN

R,

tech

nolo

gy ro

adm

aps)

gl

obal

ly, w

ith a

focu

s on

C

hina

Sca

ling

up u

se o

f al

tern

ativ

e fu

els

Enh

anci

ng e

nerg

y ef

ficie

ncy

of th

e ce

men

t m

anuf

actu

ring

proc

ess

Red

ucin

g cl

inke

r / c

emen

t ra

tio

Eng

agin

g th

e fu

ll va

lue

chai

n to

max

imiz

e av

oide

d em

issi

ons

by

usag

e of

con

cret

e

Dev

elop

ing

new

cem

ent

clin

kers

with

lo

wer

ene

rgy

&

calc

inat

ion

requ

irem

ents

Eva

luat

ing

cros

s-se

ctor

alin

itiat

ives

to

scal

e up

cap

ture

, use

& s

tora

ge o

f car

bon

14

CEO Statement - Cement

Concrete and Cement

Concrete plays a vital part in our daily lives, through many diverse applications and usages. It is, in fact, the most used man-made material in the world, with three tons used annually for each man, woman and child.

Thanks to its properties (strength, durability, thermal mass, affordability and abundance of raw materials), concrete can enhance the sustainability of the built environment (from schools, hospitals and housing, to roads, bridges, tunnels, runways, dams and sewage systems), as it offers wide flexibility to construction professionals to achieve their sustainability goals.

Cement is the essential “glue” in concrete. It reacts with water to bind aggregates (crushed stone and gravel) and sand.

Cement production accounts for approximately 5% of worldwide man-made CO2 emissions:

• about 60% of these emissions come from the raw materials used in the manufacturing process of cement, the basic chemical de-carbonation of limestone into lime releasing CO2; and• about 40% of these emissions come from the energy required for the above chemical reaction and to heat the materials to a temperature of about 1450°C.

A long-term committed effort to mitigate the CO2 emissions from the cement sector

Aware of the vital role that concrete plays and will continue to play in the future of our modern society (with increasing urbanised population and mobility needs development), and aware of the significant challenge that mitigating the CO2 emissions from the cement sector represents, some forward-thinking, leading cement companies gathered together in 1999 to create the Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI), a CEO-led project operating under the auspices of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD).

Since 1999, climate change mitigation has been at the heart of CSI strategy and work program and the project has realised the following achievements:

• Develop a common Energy and CO2 reporting Protocol for the cement sector, based on the well-known GHG protocol designed in cooperation by the WBCSD and the World Resources Institute (WRI),• Set-up the most comprehensive sectoral database of CO2 emissions, enabling a rigorous monitoring of the CO2 emissions of the sector (2015 was the 8th consecutive reporting year),• Develop technology roadmaps in partnership with the International Energy Agency (IEA) and with the financial support of the International Finance Corporation (IFC) in order to

§ Identify the available and developing technologies, including breakthrough advancements

15

§ Evaluate their potential and their needed implementation level to remain within the 2°C temperature increase in 2050

As early as 2009, the WBCSD and the IEA issued the very first sectoral Carbon Technology Roadmap, paving the way for other sectors to follow.

• Scale-up the implementation of these technologies through § cooperation with national and regional cement trade associations, § expanding the CSI membership (it grew up from 10 companies in 1999 to 24

companies in 2015 and others will soon join), and § development of regional technology roadmaps (India, Brazil, Egypt…) to

better fit to the local contexts and focus on implementation

A collaborative effort both within and beyond the sector is necessary

Beyond the tremendous efforts already being undertaken by our cement companies worldwide, in particular through the collaborative approach of CSI, we believe that further action is needed.

We established a shared statement of ambition, by which CO2 emissions should be reduced in the range of 20 to 25% by 2030 compared to business as usual, an average emission rate equivalent to the emissions of the best-in-class CSI company 2020 targets.

To move forward towards this aspirational goal, we invite the whole sector to join and set-up the following action plan:

1. Enhance the coverage of the sector’s CO2 emissions and energy consumption database, with a specific focus on China (about 60% of cement worldwide production).2. Enhance overall energy efficiency of the cement manufacturing process.3. Scale-up the collection, availability and usage of good quality alternative fuels and raw materials, including relevant waste from other sectors in a circular economy approach.4. Further reduce the clinker content in cement to minimize the share of the energy-intensive part of the process.5. Develop new cements with reduced net CO2 emissions over the full life cycle.6. Engage the full building and infrastructure value chain in local markets to identify and maximize the avoided emissions by usage of cement and concrete products.7. Evaluate cross-sectoral initiatives, particularly on the opportunity to capture, use and store carbon (CCS-U).

The success of these actions is dependent on policy-makers’ ability to:

• Agree on a long-term, universal climate agreement in Paris in 2015 to enable the private sector to undertake appropriate long-term investments. We expect it.• Strengthen international cooperation to gather reliable, industry-level energy and emissions data, as well as the development of life cycle assessment (LCA)-related tools and databases for all construction and infrastructure projects. Our experience in the CSI proves that what gets measured gets done.• Unlock data disclosure barriers in countries where they still exist, such as China. We need it to ensure a better representation of the whole sector.• Develop a concerted strategy on adaptation to climate change in order to match the societal challenges ahead of us. We believe that adaptation and mitigation should be looked at in conjunction.

16

• Review and update regional, national and local level legislation, to ensure the use of alternative fuels and biomass is incentivized by policy. We favour local, customized initiatives, as there is no one-size-fits-all solution.• Develop, revise and strengthen adequate performance-based standards, codes and public procurement policies promoting low-carbon cements. Composition-based standards are often the biggest hurdle for the introduction of cements with a smaller CO2 footprint.• Promote the development of regulatory and financial incentives for innovative low-carbon cements. Industry is active, but further support is crucial.• Establish financial incentive mechanisms for funding research, pilot and demonstration of CCS-U projects, leading to commercial-scale demonstration plants. Sectoral cooperation, such as CSI, has proven to be successful. We believe it is time to expand it to cross-sectoral collaboration and confirm our interest to be involved in the process.

Cem

ent

17

Ren

ewab

les

The Scaling Up Renewables LCTPi brings together some of the world’s leading energy companies to develop business solutions to facilitate accelerated deployment of renewable energy. In partnership with various institutions, the initiative is addressing technical and commercial barriers to scaling up renewable energy to drive down carbon emissions from the energy sector and bring wider benefits to society, the environment and the economy.

Key barriers identified are effective integration of increasing penetration of renewable energy in the grid and ensuring access to finance for (and bankability of) renewable energy projects.

Four key action areas are being developed:• Scale green bond issuance to increase access to finance by working with development finance institutions, institutional investors and banks;• Scale corporate RE procurement via PPAs to address offtake risk and improve bankability by working with corporate buyers;• Improve integration of RE into grids and electricity markets by developing evolutionary solutions and recommendations and engaging proactively with policymakers and regulators;• Accelerating the deployment of low carbon microgrids, to promote sustainable energy access particularly in emerging markets.

China is a major market for renewable energy globally and with the forthcoming restructuring of the single buyer market as well as the opening of the local bond market, this initiative addresses areas highly relevant to China’s market development.

Renewables

18

The Scaling Up Renewables Low Carbon Technology Partnerships

initiative

Considerable acceleration in deployment of renewable energy is needed in order to decarbonize the energy sector and achieve the International Energy Agency 2°C scenario.

In addition to hydropower, currently the largest renewable energy source, wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) are mature technologies that are increasingly competitive with conventional energy sources. Meanwhile, demand for renewable assets from investors is growing. However, challenges remain or, indeed, emerge – particularly in terms of integration of increasing penetrations of renewable energy (RE) into the grid, electricity market design, ensuring bankability of RE projects and scaling finance for RE deployment.

Through the Low Carbon Technology Partnerships Initiative, a group of sixteen leading companies in the energy sector are working together on solutions to directly address these key barriers to accelerated deployment of RE and to enable the transition to a low carbon economy to be achieved at the lowest possible financial, environmental and societal cost.

The group shares the ambition that:Renewable energy is reliable and increasingly competitive and we believe that 1.5 TW of additional capacity can be deployed before 2025. We are working to scale up deployment by improving RE integration and removing barriers to finance.

The 1.5 TW figure is based on the International Energy Agency (IEA) 2 degrees scenario (DS) which states that renewable energy capacity must grow from 1.94 TW in 2015 to 3.49 TW in 2025. This deployment of RE will reduce cumulative global CO2 emissions by 13 Gt by 2025 compared with the IEA 6DS.

Four action plans have been developed to address the key barriers:

• Facilitating efficient, reliable, effective and commercially viable integration of renewable energy into grids and electricity markets, by developing evolutionary solutions and recommendations, by proactively engaging with policymakers and regulators and by promoting energy interconnections globally; • Facilitating the significant scaling up of green bond finance through a commitment to robust verification and transparency as well as de-risking our project pipelines;• Working with corporate renewable energy buyers to scale renewable energy procurement and increase direct demand for renewable energy;• Promoting sustainable electrification of remote areas via accelerated deployment of low carbon microgrids.

19

Business has taken the lead in technological development. In many cases the technologies are also commercially available. In some cases further development is needed, such as for crucial enabling storage and smart grid technology.

New business models and forward-looking regulatory and market structures are the next step towards facilitating the accelerated deployment of renewable energy technologies.

However, business cannot act alone. Success also depends on urgent action by governments, both at the local and global level. Current market and regulatory conditions cannot drive the global deployment of renewable energy technology at the speed that is required.

Policies need to be tailored to match national contexts and to remove the barriers we have identified, and to put renewable technologies on a level playing field with conventional ones. Critically, governments need to work together across the globe, to address this inherently global challenge.

We believe that public policies should promote:

• A stable and robust carbon pricing system across all sectors of the economy with dedicated use of revenues for renewable energy and other low carbon initiatives;• A stable and reliable energy policy framework that sends a clear signal to investors while being flexible to evolving technical, economic and social circumstances;• A level playing field between renewable and conventional technologies, addressing issues such as subsidies to fossil fuels, discriminatory market rules in some markets, systemic bias in financial regulation and unfavourable administrative requirements;• Development of operational and market frameworks to harness and value the full potential of renewable generation and facilitate the deployment of new business models;• Planning of and investment in transmission and distribution infrastructure with consideration for the growing penetration of distributed renewable energy;• Support for innovation and R&D across a wide range of proven and promising technologies.

We will continue to innovate and invest in renewable energy and we will continue to work together on the actions listed above.

However, we emphasize that government action on these recommendations is also necessary to ensure the scalability of our business solutions and, ultimately, to remain under the 2°C threshold.

We look to governments and to other stakeholders to work together to create a policy environment that encourages and supports this massive and essential investment in renewable energy infrastructure.

20

The Scaling Up Renewables Action areas

The action plans will focus on overcoming key barriers to scaling RE deployment by:

• Scaling green bond finance for RE deployment;• Promoting direct corporate procurement of RE via PPAs; • Addressing integration of increasing penetrations of RE into the grid and electricity markets;• Accelerating the deployment of low carbon microgrids.

1. Scaling green bond finance

Institutional investors present a huge potential source of funding for RE projects, however only a small fraction of assets under management is currently invested in RE or green infrastructure projects.

New investment models and financing approaches are necessary to scale finance for RE. To this end, green bonds present a promising opportunity as the relatively simple and liquid nature of this instrument means there is potential to unlock significant institutional investment. However, de-risking projects is also essential to ensure they meet the risk-return profiles of investors.

We will develop a green bond program to unlock institutional investment to scale finance as well as reduce the cost of capital. This will involve commitment to certification, transparency and good practice in monitoring and reporting. Companies will work together with the IFC and private banks to de-risk project pipelines, promote standardization of projects and work on potential risk sharing structures such as aggregation. Workshops and stakeholder engagement are also needed, particularly in engaging investors and expanding the program beyond the core group companies.

2. Scale corporate procurement via PPAs

Offtake risk is a key issue for renewable energy projects and addressing credit risk associated with weak utilities is important in unlocking additional and lower cost capital for RE. Meanwhile, growing cost competitiveness, strained public finances and increasing corporate interest to directly procure RE combine to present both a need and an opportunity for alternative offtake approaches.

Businesses are actively adding renewable energy capacity both onsite and offsite, as well as entering into Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). Encouraging corporate procurement via PPAs directly addresses offtake risk for RE projects and facilitates substitution of demand towards renewable energy.

We will develop a “RE marketplace” to bring together suppliers and offtakers to collaborate to scale corporate procurement via PPAs. We will work together to address

21

key issues for this approach, including risks for both procurers and supplier, streamlining and simplifying administrative procedures and collaboration in developing suitable business models. In addition, we will engage with policymakers to promote regulatory environments that facilitate the growth of this business model.

3. Improve integration of RE into grids and electricity markets

Integration of RE into grids and energy markets is the next frontier to deploy larger volumes of renewables. However, regulation and market design remain barriers for the large-scale integration as traditional market structures and regulations do not fit well with new technologies. Evolutionary grid codes and appropriate market mechanisms are needed to fully harness the flexibility and value of RE.

We will, in partnership, develop a continuing and structured engagement platform to address key issues relating to grid integration and energy market operation as penetrations of RE increase. The key objectives of this platform are as follows:

• Facilitate development of evolutionary grid code requirements with a focus on the role of DSOs;• Promote market design that allows full participation and recognition of RE capabilities;• Promote deployment of new business models that facilitate greater RE participation; • Accelerate deployment of smarter solutions through provision of guidelines, best practices and case studies/learnings.

4. Low carbon microgrids

Addressing the lack of access to clean, reliable and affordable energy for billions of people is one of the world’s most critical development challenges. Continuing business-as-usual for remote electrification will cause an explosion in greenhouse gas emissions. As such, we must develop viable alternatives that drive adoption of renewable sources of energy. Our aim is to accelerate the adoption of low-carbon microgrid solutions globally by streamlining the process of identifying relevant solutions.

We will provide assurance and the tools necessary for stakeholders to quickly identify relevant microgrid solutions and make the case for including higher proportions of RE. This will include identifying a range of relevant contexts where microgrids are an attractive solution, recommending technology options and business models, showcasing existing projects and developing policy recommendations to enable accelerated and scaled-up deployment.

22

Ene

rgy

Effi

cien

cy in

Bui

ldin

gs

With the LCTPi Energy Efficiency in Buildings, WBCSD brings together a network of committed organizations (local and global) with knowledge, expertise and convening power to provide the necessary frameworks and tools and to engage local building stakeholders in dialogue towards delivering concrete actions that address locally relevant market barriers that withhold projected potential energy savings in buildings. LCTPi-EEB builds on the WBCSD EEB 2.0 project which has carried out 10 pilot private sector-led local multi-stakeholder engagements* (“EEB Laboratories”) to develop market-relevant action plans that address the key barriers for energy efficiency in buildings. As a result of these EEB Laboratories, EEB 2.0 member companies are leading the development of market-specific action plans in 10 local markets around the globe.

Market barriers addressed in LCTPI-EEB:• lack of awareness and leadership particularly related to challenges in making the business case; • workforce capacity and the need for proper skills and collaboration along the value chain to implement the right solutions; • lack of adequate financing models; and • lack of consistent and long-term policy frameworks (national and sub-national), including regulations and incentive schemes.

The LCTPi creates a scalable platform to rapidly move this forward around the world.

*  Houston/US; Warsaw/Poland; Bangalore & Jaipur/India; Rio de Janeiro/Brazil; The Netherlands/Belgium; Kuala Lumpur/Malaysia; Jakarta/Indonesia; Singapore; China (Shanghai)

Energy Efficiency in Buildings (EEB)

A SHORT HISTORY

Recognizing the significance of energy consumption by buildings, which accounts for about 40 % of energy consumption globally and more than 20% of China’s primary energy consumption, the WBCSD initiated the cross-industry Energy Efficiency in Buildings (EEB) project in 2006. Completed in 2010, the first phase of the EEB project sought to create an understanding of both the challenges and opportunities within the building sector; delivering a roadmap for market transformation to improve energy efficiency. Against this background, with much evidence on the sound financial and non-financial business case for improved energy efficiency in buildings, the WBCSD launched the EEB 2.0 project in 2013.

ENGAGEMENT PROCESS The objective of the EEB 2.0 project is to unlock financially viable energy efficiency investments that today are not being realized because of mostly “non-technical” barriers; e.g., lack of awareness/ capacity, financial constraints, lack of policy and regulatory signals, and key stakeholder conflicts of interest, which block many building market players from acting.

WBCSD has developed a model for engaging stakeholders across the entire building value chain in local markets to analyze the market barriers for energy efficiency in buildings and develop action plans that address those barriers.

The cornerstone of each local market engagement is the EEB Laboratory (EEB Lab), which aims to get a clear understanding of the market situation and, with the help of a panel of experts, deliver on an action plan for achieving market transformation with a set of clear local stakeholders’ commitments.

Shanghai is the 10th market to develop an action plan on energy efficiency in buildings, after engagements in Houston/US; Warsaw/Poland; Bangalore & Jaipur/India; Rio de Janeiro/Brazil; The Netherlands/Belgium; Kuala Lumpur/Malaysia; Jakarta/Indonesia and Singapore.

Private sector leadership for energy efficiency in buildings A project of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and its partners in China

Energy Efficiency in Buildings Laboratory – Shanghai, China

23-24 February, 2016

HE EEB LAB The Shanghai EEB Laboratory (EEB Lab) will take place on February 23 and 24, 2016.

It will seek to convene building market stakeholders in Shanghai – namely developers, investors, designers, engineering firms, facility managers, city representatives, owner-occupiers, and corporate tenants to discuss, define action, and gain commitments around 4 core topics:

Awareness (benefits of EEB) Workforce capacity (training and skills) Investing and financing Policy and regulation

These topics were highlighted as key market barriers during an initial workshop held in Shanghai in December 2013. The focus of the EEB Lab in February will be to discuss and refine these results and develop an action-led program to address them.

PROGRAM

Preparation of a market review - Tongji University have prepared a market review to provide an overview of information on the building market in China. This market review is primarily prepared to provide background information for the EEB lab.

A kick-off meeting took place on October 27 in Shanghai and October 29 in Beijing; it gathered local organizations (public and private sectors) to scope the EEB lab as follows:

On February 23rd in Shanghai, a panel of local experts (called Technical Committee) will analyse a number of regional project case studies (for new construction and renovation) through a series of interviews with the key building market stakeholders involved in these projects. The discussion will focus on the core topics above.

On February 24th in Shanghai, the Technical Committee will interpret the interviews and deepen the analysis during a series of roundtables discussions. Opportunities for action will be defined, and stakeholder commitments will be pursued at market level.

A small group from the Technical Committee will start detailing the action plan resulting from the 2 day discussions on February 25th.

AFTER THE EEB LAB

A local organization will be identified ahead of the EEB lab to coordinate the work forward (assemble the working groups that will implement the actions and drive the work program for each working group).

In April/May or June (date tbc), a high level plenary session in Shanghai (and Beijing tbc) will conclude the EEB Lab with the presentation of the action plan and the launch of the EEB network created by local partners to implement the actions.

As an example, check out the action plan and commitments resulting from the EEB labs in Warsaw and Houston.

CONTACTS Jinlei Ding United Technologies Research Center (China) Ltd. Tel. 86-21 6035 7236 DingJL@utrc.utc.com

Jeffrey Yuan Arcadis Tel. 86 21 6026 1635 jeffrey.yuan@arcadis.com

Ji Qing China Business Council for Sustainable Development Tel. 86 10 6916 6795 jiqing@cbcsd.org.cn

MEMBERS & PARTNERS

EEB 2.0 project members LafargeHolcim (co-chair); United Technologies (co-chair); AGC; AkzoNobel; ARCADIS; ArcelorMittal; ENGIE; Infosys; Schneider Electric; SGS; Siemens; Skanska

EEB2.0 Global partners International Energy Agency; Urban Land Institute; World Green Building Council

Project leaders

25

Che

mic

als

Building a sustainable world where more than 9 billion people can live within the earth’s carrying capacity is a powerful mission. It means that society will have to re-invent most of the conveniences that we are taking as a given in everyday life today. The chemical industry plays a key-role on this game changing path. None of the sustainability challenges we are facing - including reducing carbon emissions - can be solved without the chemical industry’s strive for continuous efficiency gains, advanced innovation and deploying solutions faster and at scale.

As an industry of industries the chemical sector will also foster the deployment of breakthrough technologies and solutions that lower the carbon footprint of the world. Chemical products serving key sectors like Buildings, Automotive, Packaging and Food, have the potential of unlocking an additional 1 Gt CO2 savings per year by 2030. Besides leveraging additional GHG savings through the extended use of our products, we are working on new technologies that can bring up to 0.4 Gt CO2

reduction per year in our industry's emissions by 2030, on top of anticipated efficiency gains.

However, challenges remain to achieve wide stream uptake of existing cost-effective product solutions and new technology innovations that can significantly help address climate change. The key barriers that have to be tackled include:

• Market Reach – Overcoming information gaps on new technologies or product solutions; universally accepted criteria that considers the whole life cycle of a product • Risk sharing – Sharing upfront costs of breakthrough technologies and low carbon solutions through creative financing mechanisms, PPPs and steady protection of IP• Infrastructure – Gaining reliable access to cost-competitive low-carbon energy and building a carbon market design that provides incentives for use of CO2 as raw material as well as low carbon solutions• Skills – Building more capacity and understanding of our low carbon, sustainable solutions and how they can be deployed

Chemicals

26

Che

mic

als

The LCPTi Chemicals brings together six globally leading chemical companies - AkzoNobel, BASF, DSM, Evonik, Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings Company, and Solvay that are committed to live up to the sector’s responsibilities and bring a leading voice to how these goals can be achieved. The Roundtable in China will present these breakthrough technologies and product solutions, their abatement potentials, the barriers to be tackled and proposed actions, and seek input from Chinese industry, officials, and other stakeholders. The Roundtable opportunity also hopes to identify future opportunities for further collaboration and cooperation to help scale up low carbon solutions from the chemical industry.

27

Che

mic

als

LCTPi Materials: Chemicals

Global temperatures are increasing and science has confirmed that we must limit the rise to under 2°C in order to avoid the most serious consequences for people, the environment and economies worldwide.

Chemicals and Climate Challenge

The chemical and petrochemical sector is by far the largest industrial energy user, accounting for roughly 10% of total worldwide final energy demand and 7% of global GHG emissions . And, more than 95% of all manufactured products globally rely on chemistry. Chemical products and technologies also are used in a wide array of energy saving applications and therefore the industry also plays an important role in enabling the savings of GHG emissions through its application in several sectors (e.g. insulation, efficient lighting, lighter materials for automobiles and advanced materials for renewable technologies).

In 2005, global GHG emissions across the chemical industry were 3.3 GtCO2-eq (+/- 25%), with 2.1 Gt from the manufacture of products and 1.2 Gt from extraction of feedstock/fuel and disposal phases . A study compiling several life-cycle analyses (LCAs) showed that for every unit of carbon it emitted in 2005, the industry’s products and technologies enabled 2.1 units to 2.6 units of CO2-eq savings (compared to non-chemical alternatives) .

The Low Carbon Technology Partnerships Initiative for Chemicals will focus on identifying how the chemical industry can scale up reductions to its operational “footprint”, and deliver increasing GHG savings to society through its “handprint”.

Footprint:

Specifically, the LCTPi Chemicals is focused on identifying how select “game-changer” technologies that replace fossil with renewable carbon sources can be scaled up to enable

28

the industry to dramatically reduce its GHG emissions footprint and transition towards a circular economy. These technologies are:

• Use of Biomass• Hydrogen/CO2 conversion (GHG savings enabled by the supply of hydrogen from renewable sources;• Waste to chemicals; and• Photocatalytic conversion of CO2.

Handprint:

Chemicals, being the buildings blocks of 95% of al l manufactured products, have a huge handprint across value chains and products globally. And, because chemical solutions can enable significant savings of GHG emissions, the LCTPi Chemicals is also focused on identifying what collaborative actions in the Buildings, Automotive, and Food Packaging value chains, will create scale to enable these GHG savings faster.

Value Chain Example Solutions that can enable GHG emissions savings Buildings Insulation, window filmsAutomotive Plastic lightweighting, green tires, lubricantsFood Packaging Barrier films, lighter containers

Companies & Partners Involved:

29

Regional Dialogue in China:• The main objectives of the LCTPI Chemicals regional dialogue in China are:

§ Gather feedback on the game changer technologies from Chinese companies, a key growth market for future chemicals production.

§ Discuss and gather feedback on actions that could foster the deployment of these technologies at scale.

§ Share the actions for scaling up chemical industry solutions in the buildings, automotive and food packaging value chains.

§ Identify opportunities for joint collaboration and action.

Che

mic

als

30

Clim

ate

Sm

art A

gric

ultu

re

Climate Smart Agriculture is a global initiative, supported by major NGOs and governments, with the LCTPi CSA working group representing the private sector.

CSA focuses on three pillars:• Productivity• Climate Change Resilience • GHG Mitigation

Improved productivity & incomes (the first CSA pillar) is a common goal across the agricultural sector. Whilst achieving climate resilience (the second CSA pillar) is a broad goal across the agricultural sector it is only recently that responses have been designed with the benefits of advanced vulnerability assessment, climate modelling and planning approaches. The concept of bringing climate change mitigation (the third CSA pillar) into this framework is relatively recent, gaining momentum over the past decade.

Despite progress already made under the three pillars we should recognise that there is still much to do in order to achieve a ‘climate-smart’ agricultural system worldwide. Frequent major crop and livestock production failures, with devastating livelihoods and food security impacts across the developed and developing world, show that much work is needed to adapt these systems to climate change in the 21st century. The LCTPi CSA Working Group is seeking to support the business response to this challenge.

The overall Statement of Ambition for the LCTPi CSA Working Group towards 2030 is to produce 50% more available food and strengthen the climate resilience of farming communities whilst reducing agricultural and land-use change emissions from commercial agriculture by at least 3.7 Gt CO2-eq/yr by 2030 (50%). By 2050 the target is to achieve a 65% emissions reduction from the sector.

Climate Smart Agriculture

31

Fo

rest

s &

Fo

rest

Pro

du

cts

as

Car

bon

Sin

ks

The Forests and Forest Products as Carbon Sinks LCTPi focuses on actions and policies that would fast track the shift to an economy based on biomaterials, including forest resources, underpinned by the adoption of sustainable forest management practices.

The initiative is targeting companies in countries that have identified forests as an essential aspect of their mitigation aims in their INDCs and large manufacturers of emissions intensive products such as plastic and cement who are seeking to add biomaterials to displace fossil fuel derived materials.

Importantly, large scale reforestation activities are planned that will not only improve landscape resilience but also restore large areas of degraded land back to a productive purpose.

The actions documented represent the largest and the lowest cost emissions reductions at under $20 per ton of CO2 compared to other sectors and have significant benefits to biodiversity, climate resilience, water quality and soil stability that link to SDGs and the UNCCD land degradation goals.

Please note that the Forest groups specific actions and focus areas are currently under discussion and will be released for COP21.

Forests as Carbon Sinks

32

Car

bon

Cap

ture

& S

tora

ge

CCS is a key technology for delivering net zero emissions during this century: without it, achieving the 2°C global goal will likely at best very costly, at worst not feasible. Irrespective of the energy pathway going forward, the earlier that large-scale deployment of CCS starts, the lower the eventual concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Deployment of CCS – with an early focus on large-scale demonstration of the technology in carbon intense (including also emerging) economies – can be game changing in the context of managing and eventually limiting cumulative emissions.

The IEA CCS Roadmap describes a clear but very ambitious path to deployment of this mitigation lever. More recently, the IPCC 5th Assessment Report describes the much higher cost of reaching a net zero emissions society without CCS by the end of the century and also makes clear that CCS is a necessity if the world should exceed the trillion tonne threshold and require negative emissions. The IPPC suggests a combination of bio-energy and CCS to achieve this (BECCS).

Given that the sole purpose and utility of CCS technology is to reduce emissions, successful deployment will require both push and pull policies within a mature regulatory and permitting framework. As such, it is clear that we need coordinated action from both the public and private side.

The vision that binds this group together (our ambition statement) is:We aim to contribute to accelerate the deployment of CCS, recognizing that a global emissions pathway consistent with 2°C will require at least 1 Gt of CO2 being stored annually by 2030

The LCTPi on CCS has brought together a critical mass of private sector companies and partners. The leading participants include:

• Shell, Statoil, Total, Veolia, EDF, Engie, Alstom,• GCCSI, UNECE, IEA

Carbon Capture and Storage

33

Car

bon

Cap

ture

& S

tora

ge

Additionally we have sought input from a wider network of companies, environmental NGOs, government and academia.

Emissions reduction objective:

1 Gigatonne of CO2 being stored annually by 2030• 1 Gt = 500-1000 projects (each at 1Mt/y or 2Mt/y). This is approx. 40 times today’s activity levels.• Approx. 6 GtCO2e cumulative emissions reductions between today and 2030

Focus areas:

While CCS still faces a number of important challenges, several of these are being tackled by informed private sector enterprises and governments. We have identified global efforts to coordinate research into improving the energy efficiency of capture technologies and important regional efforts to create CO2 transport infrastructure hubs. The crucial gaps in global efforts, however, remain in funding and CO2 storage. To support the vision above and tackle the key challenges identified by the CCS LCTPi, we propose discussions between the public and private sector on two specific solutions:

1. An innovative CCS funding solutionIf CCS is to be deployed at very large scale throughout this century to comprehensively manage emissions, a clear, long term economic driver will be needed to trigger the required projects. Conventional wisdom argues for a straight carbon price associated with the use of fossil fuels. However, as the objective of CCS is to capture and store CO2, a mechanism that specifically rewards this activity rather than penalising the emission of all CO2 to the atmosphere may be a more successful approach.

We propose the trial implementation of the above, through the creation of the Zero Emission Credit (ZEC). One ZEC would be granted to a CCS project for each tonne of CO2 captured and stored. The ZEC would in turn provide a revenue stream for the project by having value in the global marketplace which could be realised through its sale. Ultimately, this value would

34

arise through compliance based systems at a national level where capture and storage of some amount of CO2 becomes a requirement. But this is not the case now.

Until the Zero Emission Credit is widely recognised, we further propose a provisional Zero Emissions Credit Development Fund (ZDF) to drive early demand. The fund will buy ZEC units, which will establish methodologies, define the necessary operational parameters and allow limited CCS project activity to proceed in various locations, based on ZEC transactions.

2. A global map for CO2 storageFor CCS to develop to its full climate change mitigation potential, storage volumes must increase dramatically to a rate of 6 GtCO2/year by 2050 as indicated by the IEA in its 2°C scenario and its CCS Roadmap. For comparison, global natural gas production infrastructure today caters for a volume of 3364 billion cubic meters, roughly equivalent to 2.4 GtCO2/year.

Deployment of CCS will benefit from more robust and consistent estimates of regional storage. The fact that many subsurface mapping exercises are underway to create atlases of storage resources confirms the importance of having accurate information that allows us to consider CCS as a mitigation option.

We propose pooling of resources (geoscientists, data, models and techniques) across research organizations, industry and national/regional geological agencies to create a global map identifying and improving confidence in the availability of storage resources, aiming to classify these resources along the axis familiar from the O&G sector of: certain and available through to possible.

Car

bon

Cap

ture

& S

tora

ge

35

Low carbon transport fuels are part of the new bio-economy that is emerging globally. The deployment of these fuels emphasises the role of biomass in our future, given it is one of the main forms of renewable energy that can decarbonise multiple sectors such as power generation, industry, transport and buildings.

At present, only 2% of transportation fuels are low-carbon. According to the International Energy Agency, 30% of fuels must be low-carbon by 2050 if we are to satisfy economic growth while limiting the rise in global temperatures to less than 2° C. Furthermore, for certain applications such as heavy, long-distance transport, biofuels and advanced biofuels are the only alternative.

New emerging types of fuels are using alternative feedstocks such as municipal waste or CO2 to generate even lower carbon fuels, this opens a new window of opportunities for cross industry collaboration and scalable solutions for the transport sector.

The LCTPi on LCTF has brought together lead companies from different LCTF technologies, to work collaboratively as one voice for this sector. Something unique and unprecedented about this initiative is the fact that all stakeholders have acknowledged that all technologies are needed to meet the 2DS. Having such a variety of technologies represented in the group, means that we can work collaboratively on tailored solutions but also on synergies between them.

The vision that binds this group together (our ambition statement) is:Dramatically reduce CO2 emissions by replacing 10% of global transportation fossil fuel use with Low Carbon Transport Fuels in 2030.

As mentioned, the LCTPi on LCTF has brought together a critical mass of private sector companies and partners. The leading participants include:

• DSM, Lanzatech, Granbio, Joules, Audi, Novozymes,

Low

Car

bon

Tran

sfor

mat

ion

Fuel

Low Carbon Transport Fuels

36

Low

Car

bon

Tran

sfor

mat

ion

Fuel

Enerkem, Poet, Clariant, Pannonia, Copersucar, Fibria and SkyNRG• SE4ALL, IATA, ABBI, IEA, CGGE

Additionally we have sought input from a wider network of companies and environmental NGOs.

In the run up to and beyond COP21, we are targeting key governments based on their INDCs including: Brazil, China, India, South Africa and USA. Focus areas (in development): This initiative identified several key barriers to scale up LCTF technologies across all stages of maturity, such as: public perception/reputation, policy stability, feedstock supply/logistics and pre-FID finance, among others. From this list of barriers, public perception and reputation were regarded as two of the most important because they directly influence and amplify all other barriers. To act on these barriers, this LCTPi will create:

1.LCTF Technology briefings and best-in-class projects platformThe group has committed to provide information on their technologies’ impact, process and costs, as well as, the best-in-class projects that have been implemented commercially and non-commercially. All this information will be collected and compiled in a report toolkit, and in 2016 will be converted in a global on-line database. The purpose is to help policymakers and investors to make informed and ambitious decisions.

1.1 On-line LCTF PlatformThe on-line platform aims to include interactive information on LCTF technologies, bio-economy country profiles, a market place for buyers and supplier (bids & tenders) to support ‘buy-in’ along the value chain from growers to end-users locally; and a space for investor to identify and support early technology investment opportunities that help pilots reach scale.

2.Regional Technology Roadshow and Nat ional

37

Low

Car

bon

Tran

sfor

mat

ion

Fuel

Deployment RoadmapsThe group will engage with relevant government, stakeholders and partners to create a series of roadshows in bio-economy high potential countries. This action will be key to give one voice to the LCTF industry.

The countries will be identified based on the private sector interest on country demand, utilize INDCs and country profiles that the group has developed. Once the group has identified a short-list of key countries, it will start to map the relevant stakeholders to target with these roadshows.Some of the priority countries already identified include: Indonesia, Thailand, China, Mozambique or Colombia.

2.1 National Deployment RoadmapsOnce the companies have engaged with certain countries, they will create national deployment roadmaps for low carbon transport fuel technologies according to resources, fuel infrastructure and economy. This aims to:

• Boost Market Demand by proposing a set of policy recommendations to ensure policy stability, develop demand, offset opportunities and enforce mandates.• Catalyse a Next Wave of Projects by building a government/industry consortium committed to the roadmap and establish Private Public Partnerships to invest in LCTF facilities.• Ensure long-term growth by ensuring feedstock supply & logistics, and technology Improvement.

4.Attendee List

40

Action2020 Climate DialogueAttendee List

Organization Name PositionNational Development and Reform Commission(NDRC) Zhaoli JIANG Deputy Director,Climate Change

DepartmentWorld Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)

Peter WHITE Chief Operation Officer

Energy Research Institute, NDRC Kejun JIANG Director General

China Cement Association (CCA) Xiangzhong KONG Vice President and Secretary General

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)

Philippe FONTA Managing Director, Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI)

SinoCarbon Innovation & Investment Co.,Ltd Guoqiang QIAN Strategy Director

CLP Power Hong Kong Limited Jeanne NG Director of Group Sustainability

Climate Bonds Initiative Sean KIDNEY CEO & Co-Founder

China Electricity Council Weidong ZHANG Director of planning department & Statistics

China Petroleum & Chemical Industry Federation(CPCIF) Yongliang LI Director, Industrial and Developing

Dept.China Architecture Design & Research Group Archetecture Design General Institute Green Building Design & Research Center

Peng LIU Director Chief Senior Engineer Registered Utility Engineer

United Technology Company Murilo BONILHA General Manager, United Technologies Research Center

International Energy Agency Eric MASANET Head, Energy Demand Technology UnitBeijing Jiaotong University Jing LIU Associate ProfessorChina Business Council for Sustainable Development Qi ZHAI Executive Secretary General

State Grid Jianxing SUN Co-chair of International DepartmentState Grid Yuan BI Manager of International Department

CHEMCHINA Jianjun JI Vice Director, Environmentant and Safety

CHEMCHINA Ning YU Section Chief, Environmentant and Safety

41

China National Building Material Company Limited Fengwei ZHAO Vice Director of International

DepartmentChina National Building Material Company Limited Lijie SHI Business Manager of International

Cooperation DepartmentChina National Building Material Company Limited Jun LIU General Manager Assistant of

International Cooperation DepartmentWest China Cement Weiping MA CEO"China ASEAN (SCO) Environmental Center China-ASEAN Environmental Cooperation Center, MEP"

Dongmei GUO Senior Research Fellow, Division Director

SinoCarbon Innovation & Investment Co.,Ltd Renhu TANG General Manager

State Development & Investment Corporation(SDIC)

Ya YUAN Senior Manager

State Development & Investment Corporation(SDIC)

Lin DENG Senior Manager

CSTCMOC Fang WANG EngineerBaoSteel Economic&Management Research Insititute

Xiaodan DONG Director, SD Research Institute

China National Materials Group Corporation Ltd. Zhiwei LI Director, International Development

Dept.CNPC Research Institute of Economics and Technology Xiaojie XU Director

Economics & Development Research Institute, SINOPEC

Tao TIAN Senior Engineer

Economics & Development Research Institute, SINOPEC

Suya BAI Manager

Economics & Development Research Institute, SINOPEC

Zhan LI Project Manager

Economics & Development Research Institute, SINOPEC

Yang CUI Engineer，Energy Saving Center

China Petroleum & Chemical Industry Federation(CPCIF) Hui WENG Engineer

Huajing Carbon Asset Management Co.LTD, China Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection Group

Weimin TANG Deputy General Manager

42

Danfoss China Alfred CHE Vice President, Corporate Communication & Public Affairs

Danfoss China Guangyu LI PR ManagerVEOLIA BEIJING REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE

Echo JIANG Government Affairs & Marketing Director

LafargeHolcim Ralph ZHANG Public Affairs DirectorThe Dow Chemical (China) Linda ZHU Head, Sustaibable ProgramEvonik Degussa (China) Co., Ltd. Grace LI Director,Management Office &

CommunicationsEvonik Degussa (China) Co., Ltd. Julie ZHU Sr.CSR Specialist, Public &

Government Affairs

DNV GL Energy Sharon GUO Director of Public & Governmental Affairs

Shell Companies in China Vanessa XU Social Investment Advisor Communications

BP (China) Holdings Limited Hongda ZHOU Government Affairs Manager

ABB (China) Ltd. Jianxin ZHAO Environmental Specialist, China Sustainability Affairs Dept.

ABB (China) Ltd. Hai Dan YU Occupational Health Officer Country Sustainability Affairs

EDF Mathieu BARATIER

Executive Coordinator of EDF-Asia Pacific Branch

International Finance Corporation Eric SIEW

International Finance Corporation William BELOE IFC China Office

International Finance Corporation Guo HAO IFC China Office

Apple Yang YU Manager， Environmental AffairsUnited Technologies Research Center (China) Ltd Jinlei DING Group Leader, Thermal and Building

Systems CLP Power Hong Kong Limited Stephen HUI Deputy Head – Conventional Energy

(China)DSM (China)Limited Beijing Branch Echo BAO Corporate strategy and sustainable

development commissioner UPM-Kymmene Corporation Xiqin CUI Specialist, Public & Government AffairsNEC Corporation Qingli KONG Planning Department

China Building Materials Academy Juan LI

Officer of CSI in China, Director of International Scientific Cooperation Center

Key Lab of Cement-based Materials, CBMA Jiayuan YE Vice Director

Institute of Technical Information for Building Materials Industry of China

Steven WANG Professor, vice-CTO

China Resources Cement Holdings Limited Yingzhong ZHANG Vice President and Chief Safety and

Environmental Protection Officer

43

China Resources Cement Holdings Limited Jinkang WEI Senior Manager, EHS Dept.

China Resources Cement Holdings Limited Angel FU Assistant Manager of CSI Team

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)

Dominik Breitinger Managing Director

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)

Yvonne Leung Manager, Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI)

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)

Karolina Sodergren Associate，Global Network

China Business Council for Sustainable Development (CBCSD)

Kun ZHAN Chief Counsel

China Business Council for Sustainable Development(CBCSD)

Qing JI Director

French Embassy in China Jeremy MAST Economic AttachéThe Climate Group Changhua WU Greater China DirectorThe Climate Group Handuo CAI Research ManagerThe Paulson Istitute U.S. Beijing Representative Office Cindy JIANG Manger, Chinese Partner Relations

Secretariat of Eco-Forum Global Jiqiang DAI Managing Director

Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Pengfei XIE Director,China Sustainable Cities

Project Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI) Xiaoli TANG Senior Program Officer

Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI) Inhee CHUNG Sustainability & Safeguards Specialist

World Resources Institute (WRI) Hong MIAO Energy Program Lead

Carbon Discloure Project Rusong LI Director, China, Carbon Disclosure Project

Carbonstop(Beijing) Tech Co.,Ltd Luhui YAN Founder&CEO

Shanghai Huanyi Environmental Technology Ltd.

Wanbin GONG CEO

The Sustainability Consortium (TSC) Jiali PAN Project Manager

Jia Cui (China) Environmental Promotive Center

Danny LAN Director Public Affairs

Solar Valley Foundation Lian JIANG Secretary GeneralChina Environment Jounral Jianzhen LIU Editor