Action 12: Internal Monitoring

BMW Regional Assembly

Monitoring 1

• 3 Key Elements– Capturing all project outputs, relative to

performance indicators in approved application– Analysis of progress on all planned actions relative

to agreed timeframe and milestones– Monitoring expenditure v forecast for each

partner and project-level cost category

All of the above are required to complete 6 monthly progress reports

Monitoring 2

• 2 Additional Elements– Regional Stakeholder Feedback Forms– Action Beneficiary Feedback Forms

– Contribute to Best Practise Guide (Action 11)– Input to External Evaluation (Action 13)– Contribute to Mainstreaming Strategy (Action 14)

Progress Reporting

BMW Regional Assembly

Progress Report – General Issues One common report for the whole partnership

In line with the Application Form (Action Plan) Twice a year (April/October) Long Version (April) to cover previous calendar year, including indicator data and Work Package Reports Short Version (October) to cover 6 months (January – June) Assessment of the Progress Report through a JTS Monitoring Report Must meet deadlines – 31st October & 30th April

Short Progress Report – October

I. General Information(general project data, details on reporting period, summary description of the project in English)

II. Progress of the project – last 6 months(e.g. main achievements, added value of working transnationally, problems encountered)

III. Monitoring of QUALITATIVE indicators(e.g. strength of cooperation between partners, innovativeness, capitalisation on previous projects)

IV. Date and signature of the Lead Partner

Long Progress Report – April I. General InformationII. Overall cumulative progress of the project III. Progress of the project – last 12 months

(including reporting on WPs and investments, submission of supporting annexes)

IV. Monitoring of QUANTITATIVE indicators(indicators specified in the Application Form)

V. Planned activities for the next 12 months VI. Date and signature of the Lead Partner

Indicators

Indicator – the measurement of an effect to be obtained. 2 Progress Reports – 2 sets of indicators

Qualitative(in October PR)

Quantitative(in April PR)

generalPriority specific

results outputs

RESULTS(immediate

effects)

IMPACTS (long-term

effects)

OUTPUTS (direct

outcome)

INPUT ERDF

general

Progress Report – JTS Guidance Give an accurate picture of the project’s progress through

concise and relevant information Avoid reporting on activities that have not yet taken placeReport on the implementation of the project as a whole, rather than on the partners’ individual activities (use annexes!) Report on achievements (outputs) and on the added-value of transnational cooperation Avoid listing a number of unrelated activities not clearly linked to the Action Plan Draft together (it is not a compilation!) Provide the JTS with material to disseminate

Action 13: Evaluation

BMW Regional Assembly & Líonra

Evaluation 1• Independent evaluation to be undertaken prior

to project completion• Draft terms of reference to be prepared by Líonra

and approved by the Project Steering Committee• Evaluator to be procured by Líonra • Evaluation will feed into mainstreaming strategy

and final progress report• Evaluation Report to be made available publicly

and presented at final project conference

Evaluation 2 The approved application identifies 8 Fields of Interest for the final evaluation:

• A description of the project processes and implementation arrangements, actions, outputs and resources applied

• An assessment of the results of the overall project, relative to the original indicators agreed

• Verification of the attainment of the project’s goals, including its contribution to cross-cutting programme themes (Europe 2020 and sustainable development);

• An assessment of the lasting (sustained) effects of the project on the stimulation of early- stage knowledge-intensive enterprises with export potential

• A review of the contribution of the project to the achievement of objective 1.3 of the NWE Programme, i.e., the use of territorial co-operation in order to strengthen the institutional and territorial framework for innovation and the transfer of knowledge within the NW Europe area.

• An assessment as to whether the communication and dissemination objectives for the project and the related indicators have been attained

• An assessment of the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the project’s delivery• Identification of further actions that could be taken at a regional or inter-regional level

to inform future innovation and cohesion policy within the NW Europe area.