page 1

CNSX: GTCH

OTCQB:GGLDF

Investor Presentation

July 2020

GOLD CORP.

✓ Acquired Historic Ounces in Nevada

✓ Completing Technical Report

page 2

Certain of the statements made and information contained herein are “forward-looking information”. These statements relate to future events or the Company's

future performance. Statements, other than statements of historical fact, may be forward-looking statements. Generally, these forward-looking statements can

be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “anticipates”, “plans”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “continue”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “expect”, “is

expected”, “project”, “propose”, “potential”, “targeting”, “intends”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events

or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might”, or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation thereof. These statements involve known and

unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking

statements. The Company believes that the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable, but no assurance can be given that

these expectations will prove to be correct and such forward-looking statements included in this presentation should not be unduly relied upon by readers, as

actual results may vary. In particular, this presentation contains forward-looking statements, pertaining to the following: capital expenditure programs,

development plans, treatment under governmental and taxation regimes, expectations regarding the Company's ability to raise capital, expenditures to be

made by the Company on its properties and work plans to be conducted. With respect to forward-looking statements, the Company has made assumptions

regarding, among other things: uncertainties relating to receiving mining, exploration and other permits; the impact of increasing competition; unpredictable

changes to the market prices for gold, copper, and other minerals; exploration and developments costs for its properties; the availability of additional financing

and farm-in or joint-venture partners; anticipated results of exploration and development activities; and the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing on

satisfactory terms. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of the risk factors

set forth below and elsewhere in this presentation: volatility in the market price for minerals; uncertainties associated with estimating resources; geological,

technical, drilling and processing problems; liabilities and risks, including environmental liabilities and risks, inherent in mineral operations; fluctuations in

currencies and interest rates; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; unanticipated results of exploration activities; competition for, amongst other

things, capital, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; lack of availability of additional financing and farm-in or joint venture partners; and unpredictable

weather conditions. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause results to differ materially from those contained in

forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such

statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers

should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing lists of factors are not exhaustive. The Company

does not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in

accordance with applicable securities laws.

The Hot Springs Peak property was the subject of a NI43-101 report dated June 17, 2017, authored by Timothy D. Master, MS, CPG #10737 AIPG, Nevada

Professional Geologist. Ongoing exploration disclosures are also posted on SEDAR. Mr. Master is independent of the Company and is a “Qualified Person”.

The Technical Report is available for review on SEDAR at www.SEDAR.com under the Company’s profile.

The technical information in this document has been reviewed by Scott Frostad, P. Geo., who is a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.

He is independent of the Company.

Forward Looking Statements

page 3

Strategy & Goal:

➢ Advance all properties using existing data and targeted drilling

➢ Executing low cost, low risk, high value-added data analysis

➢ Leverage historic work to potentially increase project value

Assets: 3 Gold Assets & 1 Copper/Gold Asset

➢ All assets have historic production

➢ 2 past gold producers at the advanced stage of exploration

➢ 1 gold asset hosting significant Historic Resources (detailed below)

➢ Nevada focused

Management and Board:

➢ Extensive experience in the resource and finance sectors

➢ Advisory board with track record of success in the mining sector

Getchell Gold Overview

page 4

Nevada Focused

*USGS 2017 Annual Report on Gold + Nevada Division of Minerals

Past Producers:

➢ Fondaway Canyon

➢ Dixie Comstock

Prolific Exploration:

➢ Star Point

➢ Hot Springs Peak

Nevada:

➢ Top 5 Jurisdiction

Getchell’s Assets

page 5

Fondaway Canyon – A Rich History

➢ Historic gold resource estimate*:

♦ Indicated 409,000 Oz @ 6.18 Au g/t

♦ Inferred 660,000 Oz @ 6.40 Au g/t

➢ Historic gold mining in the oxide zone

➢ Extensive 3.5 km long gold mineralization corridor

➢ Excellent access and local support

➢ Potential to add ounces

* The historic resource estimate was completed by Techbase International Ltd of Reno, Nevada, and it is contained within a NI 43-101 report dated April 3, 2017 that was commissioned by

Canarc Resource Corp of Vancouver, B.C., Canada. The resource estimate was compiled only from drill holes that could be validated (591 holes @ 49,086 m), a sufficient amount to deem the

historic resource as reliable. Using Techbase software, a method of polygons was used along each vein. With a minimum 0.10 opt Au and 1.8 m horizontal vein width used as cut-off

parameters; twelve veins had sufficient composited intercepts within the sulfide mineralization for the estimate.

No capping or cutting of grades was applied. The historical resource estimate used classifications in accordance with NI 43-101 standards, namely, “indicated” and “inferred”. A review and/or re-calculation of the historic

resource is required by an independent Qualified Person to confirm these as current resources as defined by NI 43-101. A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral

resources; and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources.

page 6

➢Completed Compilation of >50 years of exploration and mining history

♦ 735 exploration and mine planning drill holes

♦ 165m underground development for bulk sample

♦ 169,000 tonnes of oxidized material mined from various pits across the Project

➢Develop Comprehensive Geological Model and Identify Priority Target Areas

➢Gold Mineralization amenable to evaluate for both open pit and underground

mining potential

➢Mineralization open on strike and to depth

➢New zones to test

➢Drill Program planned for August 2020

Fondaway Near Term Development Strategy

page 7

Potential Mineralization Expansion On Strike & Down Dip

➢ Gold mineralized trend

defined to date:

♦ 3.5 km long;

♦ 800 m wide; and

♦ 670 m of vertical extent.

➢ Numerous exploration

targets with significant

merits and blue-sky

potential

➢ The identification of Carlin

Style mineralization in the

Pediment zone adds yet

another dimension to the

scope of exploration

opportunities present at

Fondaway Canyon

page 8

➢ Heart of the defined

gold mineralization and

historic resources

➢ Drilling is localized on

specific occurrences

➢ Observed mineralization

supports robust and

substantial gold mineralizing

system at Fondaway

Canyon

➢ Significant area exists to

expand on known gold

mineralization

Fondaway Canyon Central Area

page 9

Long Section - Colorado to Pack Rat Gold Zones

➢ Substantial gold

mineralization evident

near surface

➢ Latest series of drill

holes (2017) indicate

gold mineralization

extends to depth

➢ 650 metre long

structurally controlled

gold zone

➢ Mineralization open

within section and to

depth

B’ B

page 10

Long Section - Paperweight to South Pit Gold Zones

➢ Substantial gold

mineralization evident

near surface

➢ Latest series of drill

holes (2017) indicate

gold mineralization

extends to depth

➢ 650 metre long

structurally controlled

gold zone

➢ Mineralization open

within section and to

depth

C’ C

page 11

Section – Half Moon Shear Vein and Tenneco Tunnel + Drift

➢ In 1989, Tenneco Minerals Corporation completed 165 metres

(540 feet) of underground development (adit and drift) to access,

bulk sample and assess the high-grade Half Moon shear vein;

one of the prominent gold mineralized quartz rich shear zones

within the central area of the Project

➢ Gold mineralization in the Half Moon area has been traced for a

375m vertical extent and remains open to depth

Photographs from left to right – i) Underground development face at the Half Moon shear vein; andii) Tenneco adit portal circa 1990.

75m below surface

page 12

UG Drift on Half Moon Shear Vein – Development Face Samples

➢ 12.4 g/t Au across full 4.3m width

of the most eastern drift face

(1125E)

➢ 19.4 g/t Au over 3.1 metres,

including 24.1 g/t Au over 1.8 m,

at drift face 1040E

➢ 12.0 g/t Au over 3.2 metres,

including 21.8 g/t Au over 1.5 m,

at drift face 1031E;

➢ The characteristics of the gold

mineralization at Fondaway

support the Company evaluating

the Project’s potential for both

open pit bulk tonnage and high

grade underground mining

High Grade Gold

page 13

Fondaway Canyon Western Area

Showing the South Mouth Open Pit – 155,000 tonnes oxidized material mined 1989-1990

page 14

➢ Predominately

shallow historical

drilling

➢Recent drilling

reveals gold at depth

and open

➢Underexplored

➢ Pediment Zone:

Distinct ‘Stand Alone’

Carlin Style Gold

Mineralization Target

Broad Gold Intercepts

Never Followed up

Long Section - Pediment, South Mouth and Mid-Realm Gold Zones

page 15

Fondaway Canyon:

page 15

Getchell is planning for the 2020 drill program at Fondaway Canyon and

has provided a cash deposit to ensure rig availability for late July and August

Significant Gold Mineralizing System

with Huge Potential

page 16

➢Property comprised of 26 unpatented mining claims administered by the BLM

➢Low-sulfidation, epithermal gold system localized along a moderately dipping range-front

normal fault on the east flank of the Stillwater Range 78 km northeast of Fallon

➢Mineralization is believed to be hosted by Jurassic gabbro and mafic tuff in:

✓ The footwall of the fault,

✓ Silicification within the fault zone, and

✓ Within the hanging wall tuffaceous sediments

➢ 1991 Historic Resource estimate**:

✓ 146,000 ounces of gold in 4.26 million tonnes

✓ grading 1.063 g/t Au at a cut-off grade of 0.34 g/t Au

➢Mineralization remains open down-dip and to the east

Dixie Comstock Property Overview

**The historic geologic resource estimate was completed by Mine Development Associates of Reno, Nevada, and is contained within a report dated March 1991 commissioned by Horizon Gold Corporation.

The resource estimate was compiled only from drill holes (179 holes totalling 19,679 m), a sufficient amount to deem the historic resource as reliable. The kriged block model was constructed based on a N45E major axis direction with a

30 degree dip and clipped using three separate mineralized zones (high grade, low grade and hot springs mineralization) with a minimum 0.01 opt (0.34 g/t) Au cut-off. No capping or cutting of grades was applied.

The tonnage and grade estimate stated herein is ‘historic’ as defined by NI43-101 and did not use resource classifications in accordance with NI 43-101 standards, instead a single indivisible resource category was defined, a ‘Geologic

Resource’. A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimates as current mineral resources and the qualified person is not treating these historical mineral estimates as a current estimate for mineral

resources. Additional work will need to be undertaken to verify the historic estimates and classify them as current resources.

page 17

Star Point & Hot Springs Peak (HSP) Overview

➢Properties in highly mineralized

Northern Nevada Rift

➢Star Point located on the West

Central Rift of the Northern Nevada

Rift (Sleeper Deposit)

➢HSP is at a structural intersection

similar to the Getchell Gold Mine

(Barrick and Newmont)

➢Florida Canyon, Rochester, and

Relief Canyon Mines and Spring

Valley deposits are nearby

➢Road access

page 18

Star Point Overview

➢ Historic, near surface, mining operation

underlain by a magnetically defined intrusion

➢ IP-Resistivity survey over intrusion returned

chargeability and resistivity highs interpreted as

potential copper sulfide mineralization, possibly

intrusion related

➢ Drill test at Star Point centered on the high-

grade copper oxide (tenorite) mine shaft area

and will penetrate into a magnetically defined

intrusion signature containing high chargeability

and a very strong conductor

➢ Primary target to be tested is the supergene

enrichment zone of copper and primary copper

sulfide associated with an intrusion

Gold Knob

French Boy

page 19

Star South Overview

➢ Historic artisanal shallow mining area that contains

surface copper-gold oxide mineralization (tenorite)

along northeast trending faults and along the

thrust fault boundary at the surface

➢ The IP-Resistivity survey returned elevated

chargeability and a resistivity high indicating the

presence of a strong conductor

➢ The central drill target on the mine area is

designed to test through the thrust fault into the

top of the elevated chargeability and strong

conductor, possibly altered and mineralized

argillite and carbonates

➢ The western drill target is a follow-up hole to test

the shallow and strong chargeability more likely to

be in lower plate carbonates, outside of the historic

mine area and concealed under gravel coverFrench Boy

page 20

➢ Discovery of 26 meter gold-

arsenic zone during 2019 drill

program by hole HSP-RC5

➢ HSP-RC5 intercepted 0.133 g/t

Au over 26 metres including

0.69 g/t Au over 1.5 metres

➢ Anomalous arsenic was

encountered throughout the

entire length of HSP-RC5

returning a weighted average of

377 ppm As

➢ The association of gold with

arsenic sulfide minerals is a

well-known characteristic of

Carlin-type gold deposits

Hot Springs Peak Drilling Summary

page 21

Capital Structure

➢ Shares Outstanding: 58,166,977

➢ Warrants: 30,338,642

• 999,850 @ $0.10

• 16,250,900 @ $0.14

• 402,555 @ $0.15

• 10,818,938 @ $0.25

• 228,000 @ US $0.20

• 1,428,000 @ $0.35

• 210,399 @ $0.45

➢ Stock Options: 4,505,000

• 750,000 @ $0.41

• 2,005,000 @ $0.08

• 1,750,000 @ $0.15

• 1,025,000 @ $0.33

page 22

Management & Board

WILLIAM WAGENERChairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Mr. Wagener is an internationally experienced

mining executive who has been involved in the

exploration, development and operation of

resource projects across the globe in a variety

of commodities. He has held numerous

executive positions in publicly traded resource

companies. Mr. Wagener received a Bachelor

of Science in Mining Engineering from the

University of Missouri - Rolla.

Mr. Sieb has been a director and officer of

numerous publicly-traded companies over his 30

year career with his expertise extending across

multiple commodities and jurisdictions. He is

currently President of Explorex Resources Inc.,

focused on the acquisition and development of

international cobalt projects and other elements

critical to the battery sector; and he is Senior

Project Manager for the pre-feasibility stage

Mariana Lithium Brine Project in Argentina. Mr.

Sieb holds an MBA and a Bachelor of Science

degree in Geology.

MIKE SIEBPresident and Director

Jim MustardIndependent Director

Mr. Mustard is a seasoned capital markets and

mining professional, bringing over 30 years of

expertise in business and project development to

the Company. He was VP of Investment

Banking at PI Financial, past President of

Canada Zinc Metals and was a VP and Senior

Mining Analyst at Haywood Securities for 11

years. In addition to a strong technical

background, he has developed a considerable

capital market and investment network. Mr.

Mustard is a registered Professional Engineer

with the Association of Professional Engineers

and Geoscientists of BC.

page 23

➢ Existing historic data sufficient to advance all properties

➢ Executing low cost, low risk, high value-added data analysis

➢ Leveraging historic work to potentially increase project value

➢ Contact Information: William Wagener, CEO

info@getchellexploration.com

Conclusion & Contact Information