Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)

8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)

1/18

{D0197698.1 }1DOC#463349

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN RE:

ACandS, Inc.Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Combustion Engineering, Inc.

The Flintkote Company

Kaiser Aluminum Corp.Owens Corning

US Mineral Products Company

USG Corp.W.R. Grace & Co.

Debtors.

Case No.: 02-12687 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3659)Case No.: 00-4471 (Rel. Dkt. No. 10720)

Case No.: 03-10495 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3399)

Case No.: 04-11300 (Rel. Dkt. No. 5692)


Case No.: 01-2471 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3896)


IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTFOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

Mid-Valley, Inc.

North American Refractories Co.

Pittsburgh Corning Corp.

Debtors.

Case No.: 03-35592 (Rel. Dkt. No. 2790)

Case No.: 02-20198 (Rel. Dkt. No. 6997)

Case No.: 00-22876 (Rel. Dkt. No. 8161)

Hearing Date: March 28, 2011

Objection Deadline: March 11, 2011

OBJECTION OF THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEES OF ASBESTOS CLAIMANTS IN

THE FLINTKOTE, GRACE, NARCO AND PITTSBURGH CORNING

BANKRUPTCIES TO GARLOCKS MOTION TO INTERVENE FOR LIMITED

PURPOSE OF SEEKING ACCESS TO JUDICIAL RECORDS

The Official Committees of Asbestos Claimants in the Flintkote, Grace, NARCO and

Pittsburgh Corning bankruptcy cases (collectively, the ACCs) by and through their

undersigned counsel, hereby object to Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLCs (Garlock)

proposed intervention in the twelve above-captioned Bankruptcy Cases.


2/18

{D0197698.1 }2

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1. On January 10, 2011, Garlock filed a motion1 in this Court requesting access to allthe exhibits to Rule 2019 statements filed in the above-captioned cases (the Rule 2019

Exhibits). Various parties, including the ACCs, filed objections to the motion.2

Among other

things, those objections established that this Court should exercise its discretion to deny

Garlocks request because Garlocks acknowledged purposes in seeking the Exhibits were

improper and because there was cause to deny Garlock access to such information from the

twelve above-captioned cases, as shown by the relevant statutory provisions and caselaw. This

Court held a hearing on the motion on February 14, 2011. During that hearing, the Court

directed Garlock to file a formal motion to intervene in each of the Bankruptcy Cases. On

February 18, 2011, Garlock filed its motion to intervene (the Motion to Intervene),3

as well as

an amended motion authorizing access to the 2019 statements that is substantively identical to

Garlocks original motion (the Amended Motion) (and which is therefore already responded to

and refuted by the previously-filed ACC Joinder and Objection). The ACCs objections to

Garlocks intervention in the twelve Bankruptcy Cases are set forth herein.

ARGUMENT

2. Garlocks intervention for the limited purpose of pursuing access to 2019statements should be denied. Garlock does not establish that it has sufficiently shown cause to

1 Motion of Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC for Orders Authorizing Access to 2019 Statements Filed in

this Court and for Related Relief. See, e.g., In re Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. 00-22876 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Jan. 10,

2011) [Dkt. No. 8096].

2 The ACCs hereby incorporate by reference in its entirety, the Joinder and Objection of the Official

Committees of Asbestos Claimants in the Flintkote, Grace, NARCO and Pittsburgh Corning Bankruptcies toGarlocks Motion for Orders Authorizing Access to 2019 Statements and Related Relief, February 7, 2011 in the

above-captioned cases (the ACC Joinder and Objection). See, e.g., In re Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. 00-22876

(Bankr. W.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2011) [Dkt. No. 8139].

3Motion of Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC to Intervene for Limited Purpose of Seeking Access to

Judicial Records. See, e.g., In re Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. 00-22876 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Feb. 18, 2011) [Dkt.

No. 8161].


3/18

{D0197698.1 }3

intervene under Bankruptcy Rule 2018. To the contrary, Garlock is attempting to misuse

permissive intervention in the same manner it is attempting to misuse Rule 2019 to obtain

fishing-expedition discovery under the guise of vindicating public rights of access. As the ACCs

have already argued, the decision to restrict access to such materials is well within this Courts

discretion. See, e.g., In re 50-Off Stores, Inc., 213 B.R. 646, 659 (Bankr. W. D. Tex. 1997)

(following Supreme Courts guidance that bar[ring] access to judicial records is . . . best left to

the sound discretion of the trial court) (internal quotations and citations omitted). Likewise,

under Rule 2018, deciding whether to grant an interested party leave to intervene is within the

bankruptcy courts sound discretion. In re Kovalchick, Nos. 94-4256, 91-24183, 1994 WL

673105, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 1994);In re Hyde Park Pship, 73 B.R. 194, 196 (Bankr. N.D.

Ohio 1986) (the granting of permissive intervention is within the courts discretion);In re

Durango Georgia Paper Co., 336 B.R. 594, 596 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2005) ([i]ntervention is

discretionary).

A. Garlock Has Not Established Cause to Intervene

3. Bankruptcy Rule 2018(a) provides that the Court,for cause shown, may permitany interested entity to intervene generally or with respect to any specified matter. Garlock has

not shown such cause.

4. Instead, Garlock seeks to evade the cause requirement by arguing that [i]nevaluating requests to intervene under Bankruptcy Rule 2018(a), this Court has borrowed from

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b)(2), governing permissive intervention. Motion to

Intervene at 8 (citingAlterra v. Healthcare Corp., 353 B.R. 66, 70-71 (Bankr. D. Del. 2006)).

ButAlterra was merely citing Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg, 23 F.3d 772, 778 (3d Cir.

1994), for the proposition that a motion to intervene is the proper procedure for a media


4/18

{D0197698.1 }4

company to challenge protective or confidentiality orders. It did not address under which

substantive circumstances such a challenge might be rejected, and unsurprisingly, therefore, did

not address the contours of cause under Bankruptcy Rule 2018.4

And Pansy is not a

bankruptcy case, and so of course did not address Bankruptcy Rule 2018 at all.

5. Moreover, unlike here, in Pansy andAlterra media access and public rights wereat issue, whereas this Court has already recognized that Garlock is notseeking to vindicate a

public right to access. See Hrg Tr. 11, Feb. 14, 2011 (Garlock isnt seeking these to vindicate a

public right). Instead, Garlock seeks to obtain access to the Rule 2019 Exhibits from 12

different bankruptcies in derogation of the purposes of that Rule and as an end-around proper

discovery in yet other cases.5

6. Under Bankruptcy Rule 2018, a court may deny intervention if it will result inundue delay or prejudice. See In re Lynott, 193 B.R. 882, 886 (Bankr. E.D. Wisc. 1996); 9 Alan

N. Resnick & Henry J. Sommer, Collier on Bankruptcy, 2018.04[3], at 2018-6 (16th ed. 2009)

4 To the extent thatAlterra could be read to suggest that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 applies incontested matters in bankruptcy, such a reading is refuted by the clear and governing text of the Bankruptcy Rulesthemselves. Rule 24 expressly applies only to adversary proceedings. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7024 (Rule 24

F.R.Civ.P. applies in adversary proceedings). In contested and other matters, Rule 2018(a) governs intervention.

See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2018(a) (In a case under the Code, after hearing on such notice as the Court directs and forcause shown, the court may permit any interested entity to intervene generally or with respect to any specified

matter.). See also Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7024 advisory committees note (Intervention in a case under the Code is

governed by Rule 2018 and intervention in an adversary proceeding is governed by this rule [7024].) (emphasis

added); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9014(c) (omitting Bankruptcy Rule 7024 from the list of rules that apply to contestedmatters). A motion to intervene to assert a right of access to documents is a contested matter, and thus Rule 2018

controls here. See In re Global Crossing Ltd., 295 B.R. 720, 721-22 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2003) (noting that a

proceeding regarding hearing certain evidence in camera was a contested matter.). Indeed, Garlock itself

acknowledges that it moves . . . pursuant to rule 2018(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure . . . .

Motion to Intervene at 2. And while under certain circumstances cases utilizing Rule 2018 may look to precedentapplying Rule 24, they neither could nor do eliminate the requirement of the Rule that cause be shown for such

intervention, nor eliminate this Courts ability to exercise its discretion to determine what constitutes sufficientcause in a given situation.5 Garlock attempts to evade this Courts apparent conclusion that Garlocks purposes here are improper by

making the obvious point that requests for access to documents, and the relevant legal principles, are not restricted

to media outlets. See Motion to Intervene at 8-9 & n.7. But the cases it cites are neither bankruptcy cases nor

instructive on what constitutes an improper purpose in the context of Rule 2019 Exhibits and the highly confidentialmedical information contained therein. Garlock simply ignores the relevant precedent, cited in the Joinder and

Objection at 3-7, establishing that its purposes here are improper.


5/18

{D0197698.1 }5

([p]ermissive intervention is warranted if the entity demonstrates that no other entity exists to

adequately protect its position and that intervention would not result in undue delay or

prejudice). Courts recognize that an intervenor causes undue delay and prejudice when it

unjustifiably wastes resources for its individual interests. See Hyde Park, 73 B.R. at 197

(denying motion to intervene because [t]he estate would be burdened by the added delay

brought by the addition of another party to the proceedings and the extra expense of another law

firms fees to pay without the benefit of a new approach to the problems in this case.); In re

ANC Rental Corp., 278 B.R. 714, 719 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002) (intervention denied where it was

the interests [of the movants] as competitors of the Debtors which they are seeking to protect by

opposing action by the Debtors which will improve the Debtors chances of successfully

reorganizing. Those interests are not in harmony with the Debtors or the creditors of these

estates and there is no reason to let Hertz and Avis use this forum to advance their individual

interests.) (emphasis added). This is another reason Garlocks attempt to intervene in the 12

cases should be denied.

7. Finally, Garlock cannot meet its burden of establishing cause for theintervention for the same reasons its underlying request for the Rule 2019 Exhibits should be

rejected, including that it seeks the documents for purposes that are improper under the

controlling law.

8. As the ACCs have previously established, Courts have supervisory power overtheir records and files and may deny access to those records and files to prevent them from being

used for an improper purpose. In re Kaiser Aluminum Corp., 327 B.R. 554, 560 (D. Del. 2005).

See also Nixon v. Warner Commcn, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978) ([e]very court has

supervisory power over its own records and files, and access has been denied where court files


6/18

{D0197698.1 }6

might have become a vehicle for improper purposes.); 50-Off, 213 B.R. at 659-60 (refusing to

unseal a retention hearing where, among other things, the record in this matter seems at least to

suggest an improper purpose as that term was used by the Supreme Court in theNixon case);

ACC Joinder and Objection at 3-4.9. As established by the ACC Joinder and Objection, Garlocks acknowledged

purposes in seeking the Rule 2019 Exhibits for use in other cases are improper. This Court has

already made clear that attempts to seek Rule 2019 materials for use in other cases violate the

purpose of the Rule, and are inappropriate:

[T]he purpose for filing the 2019 statements is essentially to make sure that the Courtunderstands that the parties who that the attorneys who purport to represent particular

parties actually do represent those parties and therefore have the right to participate in thesignificant events in the case. They are not there for the purpose of allowing another

party to use them in some litigation context outside the confines of this case.

Hearing Transcript at 40,In re Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. 00-22876 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Jan.

13, 2010) (emphasis added). And the Court likewise specifically noted that giving you mass

discovery as to everybody who every law firm represents I think has no basis in law or in fact.

Id. at 44-45. As the Court noted, [t]hat is wholesale fishing. Id. at 51.

10. Other courts have agreed with this Courts conclusion. See, e.g., In re PremierIntl Holdings, Inc., 423 B.R. 58, 75 (Bankr. D. Del. 2010) (denying a motion to compel

performance of Rule 2019 obligations and stating the Official Committee, by filing its motion,

is clearly engaged in a litigation tactic to apply pressure on it[s] current adversary, the Informal

Committee of SFO Noteholders, as well as attempting to make an end run around a previous

ruling denying the Official Committees request for discovery seeking virtually the same

information); 50-Off, 213 B.R. at 659-60 ([u]nder the facts of this particular case, this Court

believes that a litigants seeking to obtain information from a retention hearing involving the


7/18

{D0197698.1 }7

litigants opposing counsel is an improper purpose within the meaning of that term as used in

Nixon, so that access should be denied).CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the ACCs respectfully request that this Court refuse to allow

Garlock to intervene in the above-captioned Bankruptcy Cases.

Dated: March 11, 2011 Respectfully submitted,

CAMPBELL & LEVINE, LLC

/s/ David B. Salzman

Douglas A. Campbell (PA I.D. No. 23143)

Philip E. Milch (PA I.D. No. 53519)

David B. Salzman (PA I.D. No. 39360)1700 Grant Building

Pittsburgh, PA 15219

Telephone: (412) 261-0310

Facsimile: (412) [email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

CAMPBELL & LEVINE, LLC

/s/ Mark T. Hurford

Marla R. Eskin (DE Bar No. 2989)

Mark T. Hurford (DE Bar No. 3299)

800 N. King Street, Suite 300Wilmington, DE 19801

Telephone: (302) 426-1900

Facsimile: (302) 426-9947

[email protected]@camlev.com

CAPLIN & DRYSDALE, CHARTERED

Peter Van N. LockwoodTrevor W. Swett

Kevin C. Maclay

One Thomas Circle, NW

Suite 1100Washington, DC 20005Telephone: (202) 862-5000

Facsimile: (202) 429-3301

E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]@capdale.com

CAPLIN & DRYSDALE, CHARTERED

Elihu Inselbuch375 Park Avenue, 35th Floor

New York, NY 10152-3500

Telephone: (212) 319-7125

Facsimile: (212) 644-6755E-mail: [email protected]

Counsel for the Official Committees of Asbestos Claimants


8/18


FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

In re:

ACandS, Inc.

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Combustion Engineering, Inc.

The Flintkote Company

Kaiser Aluminum Corp.Owens Corning

US Mineral Products Company

USG Corp.

W.R. Grace & Co.

Debtors.

Case No.: 02-12687 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3659)

Case No.: 00-4471 (Rel. Dkt. No. 10720)Case No.: 03-10495 (Rel. Dkt. No.3399)

Case No.: 04-11300 (Rel. Dkt. No.5692)

Case No.: 02-10429 (Rel. Dkt. No. 10043)Case No.: 00-3837 (Rel. Dkt. No.20980)

Case No.: 01-2471 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3896)

Case No.: 01-2094 (Rel. Dkt. No. 12616)

Case No.: 01-1139 (Rel. Dkt. No. 26356)


FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In re:

Mid-Valley, Inc.

North American Refractories Co.Pittsburgh Corning Corp.

Debtors.

Case No.: 03-35592 (Rel. Dkt. No. 2790)

Case No.:02-20198 (Rel. Dkt. No. 6997)Case No.:00-22876 (Rel. Dkt. No. 8161)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on March 11, 2011, I caused a copy of the Objection of The

Official Committees of Asbestos Claimants in the Flintkote, Grace, NARCO and Pittsburgh Corning

Bankruptcies to Garlocks Motion to Intervene for Limited Purpose of Seeking Access to Judicial Records

to be served upon the individuals on the attached service lists by electronic mail.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: March 11, 2011 /s/ David B. Salzman

David B. SalzmanPA ID No. 39360

CAMPBELL & LEVINE, LLC1700 Grant Building


T: 412-261-0310/ F: 412-261-5066

Email: [email protected]


9/18

Gregory W. Werkheiser, Esquire

Matthew B. Harvey, EsquireMorris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LP

1201 North Market Street, 18th Floor

P.O. Box 1347Wilmington, DE 19899-1347Tel: 302-658-9200/ Fax: [email protected]@mnat.com

Arthur H. Stroyd, Jr. , Esquire

Richard A. Swanson, EsquireDel Sole Cavanaugh Stroyd LLC

The Waterfront Building

200 First Avenue, Suite 300Pittsburgh, PA 15222Tel: 412-261-2393/ Fax: 412-261-2110

[email protected]@dscslaw.com

Garland S. Cassada, Esquire

Richard C. Worf, Jr. , EsquireRobinson, Bradshaw & Hinson

101 North Tryon Street, Suite 1900Charlotte, NC 28246

Tel: 704-377-8317/ Fax: [email protected]

[email protected]

Daniel K. Hogan, Esquire

The Hogan Firm1311 Delaware Avenue

Wilmington, Delaware 19806Tel: 302-656-7540/ Fax: 302-656-7599

[email protected]

Peter J. Ashcroft, EsquireBernstein Law Firm, P.C.

Suite 2200 Gulf TowerPittsburgh, PA 15219

Tel: 412-456-8107/ Fax: 412-456-8255


Sander L. Esserman, EsquireDavid A. Klingler, Esquire

David J. Parsons, EsquireCliff I. Taylor, Esquire

Stutzman, Bromberg, Esserman & Plifka

2323 Bryan Street, Suite 2200Dallas, Texas 75201Tel: 214-969-4900/ Fax: 214-969-4999

[email protected]@sbep-law.com

[email protected]@sbep-law.com

Natalie D. Ramsey, Esquire

Laurie A. Krepto, EsquireMontgomery, Mccracken,

Walker & Rhoads, LLP123 S. Broad Street

Philadelphia, PA 19109Tel: 215-772-1500/ Fax: 215-772-7620

[email protected]@mmwr.com

Ellen C. Brotman, Esquire

Montgomery, McCracken,Walker & Rhoads, LLP

123 South Broad StreetAvenue of the Arts

Philadelphia, PA [email protected]


10/18

Joseph F. Rice, EsquireJohn Baden, Esquire

Motley Rice LLC28 Bridgeside Blvd.

Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464

Tel: 843-216-9000/ Fax: 843-216- [email protected]@motleyrice.com


11/18

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTFOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In re:

PITTSBURGH CORNING

CORPORATION,

Debtor.

Chapter 11

Case No. 00-22876-JKF

SERVICE LIST EFFECTIVE 9/8/2010

Counsel to Pittsburgh Corning Corporation

Rosalie J. Bell, EsquirePittsburgh Corning Corporation800 Presque Isle DrivePittsburgh, PA 15239-2779

Tel: 724-733-3838/ Fax: 724-387-3809Email: [email protected]

David Ziegler, Esquire

Reed Smith LLPReed Smith Center

225 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1200Pittsburgh, PA 15222


James J. Restivo, Jr., EsquireReed Smith LLPReed Smith Center225 Fifth Avenue

Pittsburgh, PA 15222Tel: 412-288-3122/ Fax: 412-288-3063


Douglas E. Cameron, EsquireReed Smith LLP

Reed Smith Center225 Fifth Avenue



Counsel to Official Committee of Asbestos Creditors

Elihu Inselbuch, EsquireCaplin & Drysdale, Chartered

375 Park Avenue, 35th

FloorNew York, NY 10152-3500

Tel: 212-319-7125/ Fax: 1-212-644-6755


Peter Van N. Lockwood, Esquire

Caplin & Drysdale, CharteredOne Thomas Circle N.W.

Washington, DC 20005Tel: 202-862-5000/ Fax: 1-202-429-3301


Douglas A. Campbell, EsquireEmail: [email protected]

Philip E. Milch, EsquireEmail: [email protected]

Campbell & Levine, LLC

1700 Grant BuildingPittsburgh, PA 15219Tel: 412-261-0310/ Fax: 412-261-5066


12/18

Counsel to Official Committee of Trade Creditors

David W. Lampl, EsquireLeech, Tishman, Fuscaldo & Lampl, LLC

Citizens Bank Building, 30th

Floor525 William Penn Place



Counsel to Shareholders

Counsel to PPG Industries, Inc.

Peter J. Kalis, EsquireEmail: [email protected]

David A. Murdoch, EsquireEmail: [email protected]

Neal R. Brendel, Esquire

Email: [email protected] F. McGonigle, EsquireEmail: [email protected]

K&L Gates, LLP210 Sixth Avenue


Counsel to Corning Incorporated

Kimberly Luff Wakim, EsquireThorp Reed & Armstrong

One Oxford Centre, 14

th

Floor301 Grant Street



Cheryl A. Heller, EsquireWard Greenberg Heller & Reidy LLP

300 State StreetRochester, NY 14614


Counsel to PNC Bank Office of the United States Trustee

Brad Erens, Esquire

Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue77 West Wacker

Chicago, IL 60601

Tel: 312-269-4050/ Fax: 1-312-782-8585Email: [email protected]

Joseph M. Fornari, Jr., Esquire

970 Liberty Center1001 Liberty Avenue




13/18

Legal Representative for Counsel to Legal Representative

Future Claimants for Future Claimants

Mr. Lawrence Fitzpatrick

100 American Metro Blvd.Suite 108

Hamilton, NJ 08619Tel: 609-219-8862/ Fax: 609-620-1466


Joel M. Helmrich, Esquire

Dinsmore & Shohl, LLPOne Oxford Centre

301 Grant Street; Suite 2800Pittsburgh, PA 15219


James L. Patton Jr., EsquireEmail: [email protected]

Edwin J. Harron, EsquireEmail: [email protected]

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLPThe Brandywine Building, 17

thFloor

1000 West Street

Wilmington, DE 19801Tel: 302-571-6600/ Fax: 302-571-1253

Others

C. Sanders McNew, Esquire

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.100 Maiden Lane

New York, NY 10038Tel: 212-558-5500/ Fax: 1-212-344-5461


Robert Knights, Esquire

Gertler, Gertler, Vincent & Plotkin127-128 Carondelet Street

New Orleans, LA 70130Tel: 504-581-6411/ Fax: 1-504-581-6568


R. Kenneth Willman, Esquire

Willman & ArnoldOne Corporate Center

5500 Corporate Drive, STE 150Pittsburgh, PA 15237

T: 412-366-3333/ F: 412-366-3462Email: [email protected]

Thomas M. Crawford, Esquire

Litchfield Cavo303 West Madison Street, Suite 200

Chicago, IL 60606T: 312-781-6677/ F: 1-312-781-6630


Jeffrey J. Leech, EsquireMichael Shiner, Esquire

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.1500 One PPG Place


T: 412-594-5524/ F: 412-594-5619Email: [email protected]: [email protected]

Robert A. Simon, EsquireBarlow Garsek & Simon, LLP

3815 Lisbon StreetFort Worth, TX 76107

Tel: 817-731-4500/ Fax: 817-731-6200

Counsel to the DurhamsEmail: [email protected]


14/18


FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In re:

NORTH AMERICAN REFRACTORIES

COMPANY, et al.,

Debtors.

Chapter 11

Case No. 02-20198-JKF

OFFICIAL SERVICE LIST EFFECTIVE 9/8/2010

Office of the U.S. Trustee

Attn: Kathy Robb, EsquireLiberty Center, Suite 970

1001 Liberty Avenue


T: 412-644-4752/ F: 412-644-4785

[email protected]

Robert P. Simons, Esquire

Reed Smith LLP225 Fifth Avenue, STE 2800


T: 412-288-7294/ F: 412-288-3063

Counsel to Debtors

[email protected]

Elihu Inselbuch, Esquire

Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered

375 Park Avenue, 35th Floor

New York, NY 10152-3500

T: 212-319-7125/ F: 212-644-6755Counsel to Official Committee of Asbestos

Creditors

[email protected]

Peter Van N. Lockwood, Esquire

Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered

One Thomas Circle, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005-5802

T: 202-862-5000/ F: 202-429-3301Counsel to Official Committee of Asbestos

Creditors

[email protected]

Philip E. Milch, Esquire

Campbell & Levine, LLC

1700 Grant Building


T: 412-261-0310/ F: 412-261-5066

Counsel to Official Committee of Asbestos

Creditors

[email protected]

Robert G. Sable, Esquire

Sally Edison, Esquire

McGuire Woods, LLP

Dominion Tower, 23rd Floor

625 Liberty Avenue


T: 412-667-7936/ F: 412-667-6050

Counsel to Official Committee of UnsecuredTrade Creditors

[email protected]

[email protected]


15/18

Jon A. Allegretti, Esquire

North American Refractories Company

Cherrington Corporate Center

400 Fairway Drive

Moon Township, PA 15108

T: 412-375-6674F: 412-375-6957

[email protected]

Daniel M. Lewis, Esquire

Arnold & Porter

555 12th Street NW

Washington, DC 20004-1206

Tel. 202-942-5661

Fax. 202-942-5999Counsel to Honeywell [email protected]

Peter J. Sacripanti, EsquireStephen B. Selbst EsquireMcDermott, Will & Emery50 Rockefeller PlazaNew York NY 10020Tel: 212 547 5583Fax: 1-212-547-5444Counsel to Honeywell [email protected]

[email protected]

Mr. Lawrence Fitzpatrick100 American Metro Blvd.Suite 108Hamilton, NJ 08619Tel: 609-219-8862Fax: [email protected] Representative for Future Claimants

Joel M. Helmrich, Esquire

Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP

One Oxford Centre, Suite 2800

301 Grant StreetPittsburgh, PA 15219Tel: 412-288-5880Fax:412-281-5055Counsel to the Legal Representative for [email protected]

James L. Patton Jr., EsquireEdwin J. Harron, EsquireYoung Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLPThe Brandywine Building, 17

thFloor

1000 West StreetWilmington, DE 19801Tel: 302-571-6600Fax: 302-571-1253Counsel to the Legal Representative for [email protected]@ycst.com


16/18

In re:MID-VALLEY, INC., et ai.,

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTWESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Jointly Administered atCase No. 03-35592 JKFChapter 11

Debtors.

))))))

OFFICIAL SERVICE LIST EFFECTIVE 01/06/05

Albert O. CornelisonExecutive Vice President &General CounselHalliburton Company1401 McKinney, Suite 2400Houston, TX 77010Ph: 713.759.2620Fax: 713.759.2622Email: [email protected]

Jeffrey N. Rich, EsquireK&L Gates LL P599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030Ph: 212.536.4097Fax: 212.536.3901Email: [email protected]

Frank H. Griffm, ill, EsquireGollatz, Griffm & EwingFour Penn Center, Suite 2001600 John F. Kennedy BoulevardPhiladelphia, PA 19103-2803Ph: 215.563.9400Fax: 215.665.9988Email: fgriffin @ggelaw.com

Bruce StanskiSenior Vice President and CFOKellogg Brown & Root4100 Clinton DriveHouston, TX 77020Ph: 713.753.4908Fax: 713.753.2017Email: [email protected]

Counsel to Mid-Valley, Inc., et aleMichael G. Zanic, EsquireK&L Gates LLPHenry W. Oliver Building535 Smithfield StreetPittsburgh, PA 15222Ph: 412.355.6219Fax: 412.355.6501Email: [email protected]

Accountants & Financial Consultants to Mid-Valley, Inc . et aleThomas D. BibbyMesirow Financial Consulting, LLC717 North Harwood StreetSuite 3100Dallas, TX 75201Ph: 214.840.2479Fax: 214.840.2180Email: [email protected]

PI-I088388 vI

Dr. Francine K. RabinovitzHamilton, Rabinovitz & Alschuler, Inc.26384 Carmel Rancho Lane, Suite 202Carmel, CA 93923Ph: 831.626.1350Fax: 831.626.1351Email: [email protected]


17/18

Counsel to Committee of Asbestos CreditorsPeter Van N. Lockwood, EsquireCaplin & Drysdale, CharteredOne Thomas Circle N.W.Washington, DC 20005Ph: 202.862.5000Fax: 202.429.3301Email: [email protected] E. Milch, EsquireCampbell & Levine, LLC1700 Grant BuildingPittsburgh, PA 15219Ph: 412.261.0310Fax: 412.261.5066Email: [email protected]

Jack L. Kinzie, EsquireMichael C. Li, EsquireBaker Botts LLP2001 Ross AvenueDallas, TX 75201Ph: 214.953.6500Fax: 214.953.6503Email: [email protected]: [email protected]: [email protected]

Office of the U.S. Trustee

Joseph Sisca, EsquireOffice of the U.S. Trustee970 Liberty Center1001 Liberty AvenuePittsburgh, PA 15222Ph: 412.644.4756Fax: 412.644.4785Email: [email protected]

Elihu Inselbuch, EsquireCaplin & Drysdale, Chartered375 Park Avenue, 35th FloorNew York, NY 10152-3500Ph: 212.319.7125Fax: 212.644.6755Email: [email protected]

Counsel to Halliburton and RESITony M. Davis, EsquireBaker Botts LLPOne Shell Plaza910 LouisianaHouston, TX 77002-4995Ph: 713.229.1234Fax: 713.229.1522Email: [email protected]

Counsel to Legal Representativefor Future Claimants

James L. Patton Jr., EsquireEdwin J. Harron, EsquireYoung Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLPThe Brandywine Building, 17 th Floor1000 West StreetWilmington, DE 19801Ph: 302.571.6600Fax: 302.571.1253Email: [email protected]: [email protected] M. Helmrich, EsquireDinsmore & Shohl LLPOne Oxford Centre301 Grant Street, Suite 2800Pittsburgh, PA 15219Tel: 412-288-5880Fax: 412-281-5055Email: [email protected]

2


18/18

John W. Burns. EsquireDickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.Two PPG Place - Suite 400Pittsburgh, PA 15222Ph: 412.392.5413Fax: 412.392.5367Email: [email protected]

Steven P. Rice, EsquireCrowell & Moring LLP3 Park Plaza, 20th FloorIrvine, CA 92614-8505Ph: 949.263.8400Fax: 949.263.8414Email: [email protected]

Philip D. Anker. EsquireWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & DOff LLP399 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10022Ph: 212.230.8800Fax: 212.230.8888Email: [email protected]

Katherine Worthman, EsquireJames A. Shepherd, EsquireWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & DOff LLP2445 M. Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20037Ph: 202.663.6000Fax: 202.663.6363Email: [email protected]: [email protected] R. Very, EsquirePepper Hamilton LLP500 Grant Street, 50 th FloorPittsburgh, PA 15219-2502Ph: 412.454.5000Fax: 412.281.0717Email: [email protected]

Mark D. Plevin, EsquireClifton S. Elgarten, EsquireFrederick W. Claybrook, Jr., EsquireLeslie A. Epley, EsquireJames T. Hubler. EsquireCrowell & Moring LLP1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20004-2595Ph: 202.624.2500Fax: 202.628.5116Email: [email protected]: [email protected]: [email protected]: [email protected]: [email protected] R. Koepff, EsquireTancred V. Schiavoni, EsquireO'Melveny & Myers LLPTimes Square Tower7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036Ph: 212.326.2000Fax: 212.326.2061Email: [email protected]: [email protected] Morse, EsquireNancy Manzer, EsquireLinda Chanow, EsquireWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & DOff LLP1600 Tysons Boulevard10 th FloorTysons Comer, VA 22102Ph: 703.251.9700Fax: 703.251.9797Email: [email protected]: [email protected]: [email protected] K. Sinha, EsquireDKW Law Group LLC58th Floor, US Steel Tower600 Grant StreetPittsburgh, PA 15219Ph: 412.355.2600Fax: 412.355.2609Email: [email protected]

Thomas H. Grace, EsquireW. Steven Bryant, EsquireLocke Liddell & Sapp LLP3400 Chase Tower, 6600 Travis StreetHouston, TX 77002-3095Ph: 713.226.1200Fax: 713.223.3717Email: [email protected]: [email protected]

3

Documents

Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)