Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A C S U
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
1
A CASE STUDY FOR THE USE OF
IPD/BIMFOR THE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDING
NEW YORK, NY
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT GOALS
TENANTCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
CORE
ENVELOPE
OVERVIEW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
OWNED BY THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY & FORESTCITY RATNER COMPANIES
RENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOP
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
2 ARCHITECTURE
FXFOWLE ARCHITECTS
52 STORY TOWER
746 FEET TALL
CERAMIC TUBE SHADING ARRAY OVER ULTRA CLEAR
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT GOALS
TENANTCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
GLASS CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM
EXPOSED STRUCTURAL STEEL
CORE
ENVELOPE
OVERVIEW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
N
30’ 0”
30’-0”
20’-0”FOUNDATIONS:•(7) - 24” DIAMETER CAISSONS WITH 6,000 PSI
•6,000 PSI SPREAD FOOTINGS EVERYWHERE ELSE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
3 STRUCTURE
30’ 0”
30’-0”
30’-0”
30’-0”GRAVITY SYSTEM:•COMPOSITE STEEL SYSTEM
•3” METAL DECKING SPANS 10’•2 ½” N.W. CONCRETE
•TYPICAL FLOOR-TO-FLOOR HEIGHT IS 13.75’
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT GOALS
TENANTCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
32’-6” 32’-6”40’-0” 40’-0”
20’-0”
30’-0”BUILT-UP COLUMNS:•30” X 30”•WEB PLATES VARY 7” TO 1”•FLANGE PLATES VARY 4” TO 2”
FOUNDATION LOCATIONSTYPICAL FLOOR PLAN
COLUMN HIERARCHY
CORE
ENVELOPE
OVERVIEW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
2 21
3 3
4
CANTILEVER BAYS:•MIDDLE LINE IS A VIERENDEEL FRAME (1)•EXTERIOR LINES ARE SINGLE STEEL RODS (2)
7 777
7 7
88
NTHE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
4 STRUCTURE
4
5
4
6
5
4
6
5
LATERAL FORCE RESISTING SYSTEM:•STEEL ROD X-BRACING (3)•CONCENTRIC BRACES BEHIND ELEVATOR SHAFTS (4)•ECCENTRIC BRACES AT ELEVATOR LOBBY ENTRANCES
•CHEVRON (5)•SINGLE DIAGONAL (6)
4
6
5
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT GOALS
TENANTCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
2 213 3
SINGLE DIAGONAL (6)•OUTRIGGERS AT 28TH AND 51ST FLOOR (7)•THERMAL BELT TRUSSES (8)
7 77
7
88
1ST – 27TH FLOOR FRAMING29TH – 50TH FLOOR FRAMING28TH & 51ST FLOOR FRAMING
CORE
ENVELOPE
OVERVIEW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
51
COOLING
6250 TON CHILLED WATER SYSTEM
(5) 1,200 TON CENTRIFUGAL CHILLERS
(1) 250 TON SINGLE STAGE ABSORPTION CHILLER
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
5 MECHANICAL
28
( )
HEATING
PURCHASED HIGH-PRESSURE STEAM
LOW PRESSURE DISTRIBUTED TO FLOOR-BY-FLOORAHU’S HEATING COIL
HUMIDIFICATION
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT GOALS
TENANTCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
COGENERATION PLANT
NATURAL-GAS FIRED
PROVIDES 1.4 MW OF ELECTRICITY
WASTE HEAT PRODUCES PERIMETER HEATING HOT WATER
CORE
ENVELOPE
OVERVIEW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
LIGHTING
INTERIOR (SBLD)18,000 (2) 14W FLUORESCENT LAMP FIXTURES
DIGITALLY ADDRESSABLE BALLASTS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
6 LIGHTING/ELECTRICAL
COMPLEX DAYLIGHT HARVESTING SYSTEM
DESIGNED TO 1.1 W/FT2
DIMMED TO 30 FC
EXTERIOR (OVI)250W METAL HALIDE LAMPS ILLUMINATING THE
FAÇADE
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT GOALS
TENANTCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
1 FC AT TOP, 3 FC AT SIGNAGE
ELECTRICAL (FLACK + KURTZ)5 SERVICE ENTRANCES
CONDUIT IN NYT SPACE
BUS DUCT IN FCRC
CORE
ENVELOPE
OVERVIEW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
SUMMARY SCHEDULE
FUNCTION: CLASS A OFFICE SPACE
FIRST FLOOR RETAIL, OPEN-AIR PAPER BIRCHGARDEN CULTURAL CENTER & PERFORMANCE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
7 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
GARDEN, CULTURAL CENTER & PERFORMANCESPACE
ASSUMED $1 BILLION
APPROXIMATELY 1.5 MILLION SQUARE FEET
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT GOALS
TENANTCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
CORE & SHELL: AMEC
NYT INTERIORS: TURNER CONSTRUCTION
CORE
ENVELOPE
OVERVIEW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
E I P D M
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
8 PROJECT GOALS
EMPLOY INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY METHODSWITH USE OF BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING
TOOLS TO AID IN THE FOLLOWING ANALYSESEXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT GOALS
TENANTCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
CORE
ENVELOPE
OVERVIEW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
DECREASE THE BUILDING’S LIFE CYCLE COST BYANALYZING:
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
9 TENANT
ANALYZING:
• BUILDING MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
• BUILDING LIGHTING SYSTEMS
• BUILDING STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS
• BUILDING ARCHITECTURE
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT GOALS
TENANTCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
CORE
ENVELOPE
OVERVIEW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
10 CORE
OPTIMIZE THE STRUCTURAL CORE WHILE ANALYZING THEEFFECTS ON:
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT GOALS
TENANTCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
EFFECTS ON:
• BUILDING MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
• BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
• BUILDING ARCHITECTURE
• BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST AND SCHEDULING
CORE
ENVELOPE
OVERVIEW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
11 ENVELOPE
OPTIMIZE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE TO IMPROVE THEINDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND DECREASE
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT GOALS
TENANTCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND DECREASEBUILDING ENERGY CONSUMPTION BY ANALYZING:
• ENVELOPE THERMAL PERFORMANCE
• DAYLIGHT HARVESTING CAPABILITIES
• RENEWABLE ENERGY INCORPORATION
• BUILDING ARCHITECTURE
CORE
ENVELOPE
OVERVIEW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN • BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
12 OVERVIEW
FACADE
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT GOALS
TENANTCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
TENANT
WORK
FLOW
CORE
ENVELOPE
OVERVIEW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CORE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
13 ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
ORIGINAL 5-17 PROPOSED 5-17
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
APPLIED COST DATA TO FCRC SPACES
AVG: $60.58 /FT2/YEAR
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
14 RENT CHANGES
ORIGINAL: $1,279,000 /FLOOR/YEAR
PROPOSED: $1,409,000 /FLOOR/YEAR
AVERAGE DIFFERENCE: $130,000 /FLOOR/YEAR
$2,846,736.54 /Year Additionally
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
y
PROPOSED FCRC 32ND FLOOR
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
ITERATIVE DECK AND BEAM DESIGN
•14 DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS REDUCED TO ONEPOTENTIAL SOLUTION
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
15 REDESIGN OF GRAVITY SYSTEM
LS = LONG SPAN DECK & TS = TYPICAL SPAN DECKWF = WIDE FLANGE SHAPE & SB = SMARTBEAM
LS/WF/NW TS/WF/NWLS/SB/NW TS/SB/NWLS/WF/LW TS/WF/LWLS/SB/LW TS/SB/LW
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION Cor
e
Exte
rior
Cor
e
Exte
rior
WF = WIDE FLANGE SHAPE & SB = SMARTBEAMNW = N.W CONCRETE & LW = L.W. CONCRETE
•SOLUTION?:•L.W. CONCRETE ON LONG SPAN DECK WITHW-SHAPES Framing Option 1Framing Option 2
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
WALKING EXCITATION ANALYSIS:•DESIGN GUIDE 11:
•BEAM/ JOIST PANEL MODE
SUMMARY OF VIBRATION ANALYSIS RESULTS
EPICORE 3.5 EPICORE 450 LIMIT
SLAB THICKNESS (IN.) 5.5 8.5BEAM SIZE W30X108 W21X44GIRDER SIZE W24X84 W18X40
SUMMARY OF VIBRATION ANALYSIS RESULTS
EXISTING
SYSTEM
REDESIGNED
SYSTEM
SLAB DEPTH (IN) 5.5 6.25GIRDER DEPTH (IN) 17.9 17.9B D ( ) 17 7 17 7
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
16 REDESIGN OF GRAVITY SYSTEM
•GIRDER PANEL MODE
•DR. HANAGAN:•SLAB PANEL MODE
FINAL DESIGN:•USE EXISTING FRAMING WITH L.W. CONCRETE
GIRDER SIZE W24X84 W18X40FRAMING WEIGHT (PSF) 62.45 59.43SLAB FREQ. (HZ) 5.88 12.23BEAM FREQ. (HZ) 8.70 5.75GIRDER FREQ. (HZ) 7.28 5.31COMBINED WEIGHT (LBS) 107093 119710COMBINED FREQ (HZ) 4 05 3 72
BEAM DEPTH (IN) 17.7 17.7TOTAL STRUCTURAL DEPTH (IN) 23.4 24.15BEAM SIZE W18X35 W18X35GIRDER SIZE W18X40 W18X40DECK SPAN (FT) 10'-0" 10'-0"BEAM WEIGHTS (PSF) 4.50 4.50DECK WEIGHT (PSF) 53 46
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
•IMPACTS LATERAL SYSTEM AND FOUNDATIONS
STEEL TO CONCRETE CONNECTION:•SINGLE ANGLE WITH SLOTTED BOLT HOLES WELDEDTO AN EMBEDDED PLATE
COMBINED FREQ. (HZ) 4.05 3.72AP/G WITH B = 0.03 0.005 0.005 0.005AP/G WITH B = 0.05 0.003 0.003 0.003AVG. RELATIVE COST ($/SF) 34.84 28.66
DECK WEIGHT (PSF) 53 46STRUCTURAL WEIGHT (PSF) 57.50 50.50AVG. RELATIVE COST ($/SF) 22.88 24.38AP/G WITH B = 0.03 0.005 0.005AP/G WITH B = 0.05 0.003 0.003
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
17 INTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN
DESIGN CRITERIA
30 FC
1.1W/FT2
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
18 INTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
19 INTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
20 INTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
21 INTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
22 INTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
23 INTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
24 INTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
25 INTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN SUMMARY
DESIGN SUMMARY ORIGINAL DESIGN DESIGN CRITERIAPROPOSEDREDESIGN
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
REDESIGN
TARGETILLUMINANCE (FC) 50 30 30
LIGHTING POWERDENSITY (W/FT2) 1.07 1.1 0.469
ENERGY SAVINGS($/FT2/YEAR) $0.02 - $0.41
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN TOTAL SAVINGS($/YEAR) $21,976.65 - $462,242.21
OBJECTIVES:
IMPROVE UPON INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
26 AIR DISTRIBUTION REDESIGN
IMPROVE UPON INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
FOR BUILDING OCCUPANTS
ACCESS BIM TOOLS FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEM
DESIGN AND COORDINATION
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
27 AIR DISTRIBUTION REDESIGN
EXISTING UNDERFLOOR AIR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (UFAD)ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
PROPOSED DISPLACEMENT VENTILATION (DV) SYSTEM
TEMPERATURE PROFILE COMPARISON
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
28 AIR DISTRIBUTION REDESIGN
DUCTED SYSTEM
MORE EFFECTIVE STRATIFICATION
ORIGINAL DESIGN INTENT SATISFIED
HIGH-PROFILE SUSTAINABILITY
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
COST-EFFECTIVENESS
RAISED-FLOORUFAD DV
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
SOURCE: PRICE SOURCE: HALTON
DESIGN OF DV SYSTEM
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
29 AIR DISTRIBUTION REDESIGN
IES VE COOLING LOAD DETERMINATION - TYPICAL OFFICE FLOOR LOADS
APPLICATION OF ASHRAE LOAD FACTORS FOR A DV SYSTEM
DIFFUSER SELECTION – PRICE HVAC FLOOR MOUNTED THREE-WAYDIFFUSER
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRATION
LAYOUT, SIZING & DESIGN
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
L d
DESIGN OF DV SYSTEM
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
30 AIR DISTRIBUTION REDESIGN
Load Factors Load Type
Qoe (Btu/h) 0.295 Occupants, Desk Lamps & Equipment
Ql (Btu/h) 0.132 Overhead Lighting
Qex (Btu/h) 0.185 Heat Conduction through the Room Envelope and Transmitted Solar Radiation
IES VE COOLING LOAD DETERMINATION - TYPICAL OFFICE FLOOR LOADS
APPLICATION OF ASHRAE LOAD FACTORS FOR A DV SYSTEM
DIFFUSER SELECTION – PRICE HVAC FLOOR MOUNTED THREE-WAYDIFFUSER
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
Qtotal (Btu/h) Total Cooling Load
Load factors determined by ASHRAE RP-949ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRATION
LAYOUT, SIZING & DESIGN
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
L d
DESIGN OF DV SYSTEM
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
31 AIR DISTRIBUTION REDESIGN
Load Factors Load Type
Qoe (Btu/h) 0.295 Occupants, Desk Lamps & Equipment
Ql (Btu/h) 0.132 Overhead Lighting
Qex (Btu/h) 0.185 Heat Conduction through the Room Envelope and Transmitted Solar Radiation
IES VE COOLING LOAD DETERMINATION - TYPICAL OFFICE FLOOR LOADS
APPLICATION OF ASHRAE LOAD FACTORS FOR A DV SYSTEM
DIFFUSER SELECTION – PRICE HVAC FLOOR MOUNTED THREE-WAYDIFFUSER
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
Qtotal (Btu/h) Total Cooling Load
Load factors determined by ASHRAE RP-949ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRATION
LAYOUT, SIZING & DESIGN
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
DESIGN OF DV SYSTEM
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
32 AIR DISTRIBUTION REDESIGN
IES VE COOLING LOAD DETERMINATION - TYPICAL OFFICE FLOOR LOADS
APPLICATION OF ASHRAE LOAD FACTORS FOR A DV SYSTEM
DIFFUSER SELECTION – PRICE HVAC FLOOR MOUNTED THREE-WAYDIFFUSER
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRATION
LAYOUT, SIZING & DESIGN
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
DESIGN OF DV SYSTEM
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
33 AIR DISTRIBUTION REDESIGN
IES VE COOLING LOAD DETERMINATION - TYPICAL OFFICE FLOOR LOADS
APPLICATION OF ASHRAE LOAD FACTORS FOR A DV SYSTEM
DIFFUSER SELECTION – PRICE HVAC FLOOR MOUNTED THREE-WAYDIFFUSER
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRATION
LAYOUT, SIZING & DESIGN
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
DESIGN OF DV SYSTEM
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
34 AIR DISTRIBUTION REDESIGN
IES VE COOLING LOAD DETERMINATION - TYPICAL OFFICE FLOOR LOADS
APPLICATION OF ASHRAE LOAD FACTORS FOR A DV SYSTEM
DIFFUSER SELECTION – PRICE HVAC FLOOR MOUNTED THREE-WAYDIFFUSER
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRATION
LAYOUT, SIZING & DESIGN
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
35 AIR DISTRIBUTION REDESIGN
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
36 AIR DISTRIBUTION REDESIGN
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
37 TENANT CONCLUSIONS
ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT
GRAVITY SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTINGCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
UFAD DVCONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
•CHANGED FROM STEEL BRACED FRAME TO CONCRETESHEAR WALLS
•MODELS:LATERAL BASE SHEAR DESIGN SUMMARY
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
38 REDESIGN OF CORE
•ETABS•REVIT
•LATERAL LOADS DETERMINED FROM:•WIND:
•TT WIND TUNNEL TEST
•1968 NYC BUILDING CODE
LATERAL BASE SHEAR DESIGN SUMMARY
VARIABLETT WIND
TUNNEL TEST1968
NYCBC ASCE 7-05 THESIS “WINDTUNNEL TEST”
VNS 3450 KIPS 4075 KIPS 8995 KIPS 3968 KIPS
VWE 2850 KIPS 3297 KIPS 7001 KIPS 3278 KIPS
I 1.0 1.0 1.15 1.15
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
•METHOD 2 OF ASCE 7-05•SEISMIC:
•ELF METHOD OF ASCE 7-05•WIND GOVERNED FOR STRENGTH ANDSERVICEABILITY
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
FINAL DESIGN:•1ST – 30TH FLOOR:
•10,000 PSI
DRIFT & DYNAMIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY
TARGET
MEAN HOURLY ROOF WIND SPEED 63.3 MPH
H/B 4.63
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
39 REDESIGN OF CORE
•30” THICK SHEAR WALLS
•30X44 COUPLING BEAMS, 10FT LONG (TYP.)•31ST – 40TH FLOOR:
•8,000 PSI
•24” THICK SHEAR WALLS
•24X44 COUPLING BEAMS, 10FT LONG (TYP.)
TL (WE) 6.46 SEC 6.25 SEC
TD (NS) 6.64 SEC 6.75 SEC
TΘ 4.41 SEC
GP 3.75
AD(Z) 1.86 MILLI-G
AL(Z) 2.72 MILLI-G2 09
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
•41ST – 52ND FLOOR:•6,000 PSI
•18” THICK SHEAR WALLS
•18X44 COUPLING BEAMS, 10FT LONG (TYP.)
BAΘ/SQRT(2) 2.09 MILLI-G
AR 3.90 MILLI-G
APEAK 14.6 MILLI-G 15 – 27 MILLI-G *
ROOF TO BASE DISPL. RATIO H/690 H/450
* GRIFFIS LAWRENCE G., "SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATES UNDER WIND LOAD" ENGINEERING JOURNAL/ AMERICAN INSTITUTEOF STEEL CONSTRUCTION, 1993
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
FINAL DESIGN:•PROVIDES:
•MEP ACCESS BETWEEN THE CORE AND
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
40 REDESIGN OF CORE
TENANT SPACE
•ELIMINATES:•OUTRIGGERS
•X-BRACING RODS
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
FINAL DESIGN:•MAINTAINS:
•ARCHITECTURAL DESIRES:
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
41 REDESIGN OF CORE
•OPENNESS
•TRANSPARENCY
•STRUCTURAL NEEDS:•LATERAL STRENGTH
SHEARWALLS
COUPLINGBEAMSSTRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
42 REDESIGN OF CORE
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
ORIGINAL PROPOSED
ORIGINAL PROPOSED
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
43 REDESIGN OF CORE
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
ELECTRICAL ROOMSMECHANICAL ROOMEMERGENCY STAIRSFCRC RISERSACCESS TO CORE SPACES
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
44 BUS DUCT ANALYSIS
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
45 BUS DUCT ANALYSIS
(4) 500 MCM CONDUCTORS PER 3.5” CONDUIT
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
( )(6) FEEDERS TO MECHANICAL ROOMS
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
(4) 500 MCM CONDUCTORS PER 3.5” CONDUIT
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
46 BUS DUCT ANALYSIS
$57,170.10
$64,880.21
$70,662.80
( )(6) FEEDERS TO MECHANICAL ROOMS
MECHANICAL TOTAL=$344,292.37
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
$34,039.76
$41,749.87
$49,749.87
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
$26,329.64
$ ,
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
47 BUS DUCT ANALYSIS
(4) 500 MCM CONDUCTORS PER 3.5” CONDUIT
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
( )(9) FEEDERS TO ELECTRICAL ROOMS/SIDE
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
48 BUS DUCT ANALYSIS
(4) 500 MCM CONDUCTORS PER 3.5” CONDUIT$118,195.26
$129,760.43
$141,325.60
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
( )(9) FEEDERS TO ELECTRICAL ROOMS/SIDE
ELECTRICAL TOTAL=$855,548.23
$71,934.57
$83,499.74
$95,064.91
$106,630.09
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
$48,804.23
$60,369.40
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
49 BUS DUCT ANALYSIS
TOTAL ORIGINAL CONDUIT FEEDER COST
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
$1,199,876.60
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
50 BUS DUCT ANALYSIS
MECHANICAL ROOMS ELECTRICAL ROOMS
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
51 BUS DUCT ANALYSIS
TOTAL PROPOSED BUS DUCT COST
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
$1,754,285.00
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
52 BUS DUCT ANALYSIS
NEGATIVES
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
NEGATIVES
INCREASED COST
$1,200,000 $1,800,000
BENEFITS
FUTURE EXPANSION CAPABILITIES
DECREASED SPACE REQUIRED PER FLOOR
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
OBJECTIVES
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
53 MECHANICAL COORDINATION
MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SPACE FOR THE AIR HIGHWAYRUNNING THROUGH CORE
INSERT AIR DISTRIBUTION DUCTWORK INTO BIM MODEL, RUN CLASH DETECTION
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
REVIT MEP NAVISWORKS
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
OBJECTIVES
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
54 MECHANICAL COORDINATION
MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SPACE FOR THE AIR HIGHWAYRUNNING THROUGH CORE
INSERT AIR DISTRIBUTION DUCTWORK INTO BIM MODEL, RUN CLASH DETECTION
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
REVIT MEP NAVISWORKS
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
STEEL
BUILT UP COLUMNS
LARGE FRAMING MEMBERS
OUTRIGGER SYSTEM IN PLACE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
55 CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
OUTRIGGER SYSTEM IN PLACE
CONCRETE
30’’ – 24’’ – 18’’ THICKNESS
44’’ DEEP COUPLING BEAMS
DIFFERENCE
CONCRETE TAKES UP PLACE OF FRAMING
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
CONCRETE TAKES UP PLACE OF FRAMING
ADDITIONAL SAVINGS FROM OTHER REDUCTIONS
EXTERIOR COLUMN “KNUCKLES” ELIMINATED
X-BRACING ELIMINATED
OUTRIGGERS ELIMINATED
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
USING MODEL
ACQUIRE STRUCTURAL MODEL
MODEL GENERATED AND ANALYZED
UPDATED IN REVIT STRUCTURES
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
56 CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
UPDATED IN REVIT STRUCTURES
GENERATE SCHEDULES OF STRUCTURE
“MARK” STEEL MEMBERS DISPLACED BY CONCRETE
STRUCTURAL FRAMING AND COLUMN SCHEDULES
APPLY COST DATAR.S.MEANS CONSTRUCTION DATA APPLIED TO TAKE-OFFS
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
COULD BE UPDATED WITH CHANGES TO STRUCTURE
UPDATE AND COMPARE SCHEDULESCONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE CHANGES UPDATED FOR NEW CORE SYSTEM
COMPARED TO ORIGINAL TO REMAIN ON SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
SCHEDULE CHANGES2 MONTH EARLIER START FOR TOWER
2 MONTH LONGER CRANE DURATION
APPROX. $60,000.00 FOR CRANES AND CREW INCREASE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
57 CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
TEMPORARY HEAT FOR CORE DURING WINTER MONTHS
ADDITIONAL $3,000,000.00 FOR TEMPORARY HEAT
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
58 CONCLUSIONS
STRUCTURE
ARCHITECTURE
MEP COORDINATIONCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONSIPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
•EXPOSED STRUCTURAL STEEL:•DISENGAGED FROM THE LATERAL SYSTEM
•MOVED INSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
59 ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
•ELIMINATES:•THERMAL DIFFERENTIALS
•THE NEED OF THERMAL TRUSSES
•BUILT-UP SECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO MAINTAINARCHITECT’S VISION AT CANTILEVERED BAYSDAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
DEBIS HEADQUARTERS BUILDINGIN BERLIN, GERMANY
AURORA PLACEIN SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA
NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGIN NEW YORK CITY
•INTEGRATION OF OPERABLE WINDOWS AND LOUVERSPV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
60 DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
61 DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
62 DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
63 DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
64 DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
65 DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
66 DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
67 DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
68 DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
69 DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
70 DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
71 DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
72 DAYLIGHTING SUMMARY SAVINGS PER FLOOR PER YEAR
TOTAL ENERGY SAVINGS PER YEAR
$140.70 (12) FIXTURES
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
$422.10(36) FIXTURES
$422.10(36) FIXTURES
$56,280.00
NEW YORK TIMES BALLAST QUOTES
NORMAL $15/PERPV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS $140.70 (12) FIXTURES
NORMAL $15/PER
DIMMING $30-$75/PER WITH WILLINGNESS TO DECREASE
NEW YORK STATE ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
73 BIM FOR PERFORMANCE MODELING
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
REVIT IES<VE>REVIT ECOTECT ANALYSIS
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
REVIT SIMPLIFIED MODEL IES <VE>
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
74 BIM FOR PERFORMANCE MODELING
GREEN BUILDING XML (GBXML) INFORMATION TRANSFER
BUILDING GEOMETRY
WALL CONSTRUCTIONS
SHADING DEVICES
ADVANTAGES
VISUALIZATION
INFLUENCE EARLY DESIGN DECISIONS
DISADVANTAGES
CAREFUL MODEL INSPECTION
TIME-CONSUMING TO ELIMINATE ERRORS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
WORKFLOW “BEST PRACTICES”ROOM-BASED MODELING
SIMPLIFICATION
PARAMETERS
CUSTOM FAMILIES DID NOT EXPORT
SHADING SYSTEM DID NOT EXPORT
NO REVERSE TRANSFER TO BIM MODEL
REVIT COMPLEX MODEL ANALYTICAL VOLUMES ECOTECT ANALYSIS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
75 THERMAL ANALYSIS
OBJECTIVE
AMBIENT LOAD REDUCTION
ENERGY & COST ANALYSISDAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
MODEL INPUT PARAMETER BASELINE DESIGN INPUT PROPOSED DESIGN INPUT
SPANDREL PANEL
RECESSED 3/16" ALUMINUMSPANDREL PANEL:
UVALUE: 0.08 BTU/FT^2-F-HR2 1/2" RIGID INSULATION BEHIND
RECESSED 3/16" ALUMINUMSPANDREL PANEL:
UVALUE: 0.08 BTU/FT^2-F-HR2 1/2" RIGID INSULATION BEHIND
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
76 ENVELOPE CONSTRUCTION
2-1/2" RIGID INSULATION BEHIND 2-1/2" RIGID INSULATION BEHIND
FENESTRATION TYPE1" IGU VISION LITE - CLEAR W/
LOW E DOUBLE PANE - ALUMINUMFRAME
1.1" COLTLITE DOUBLE GLAZEDPANEL
FENESTRATION U-VALUEUVALUE FOR GLAZING: 0.625
BTU/FT^2-F-HRUVALUE FOR GLAZING: 0.405
BTU/FT^2-F-HR
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
FENESTRATION VISIBLELIGHT TRANSMITTANCE
0.96 (96% TRANSMITTANCE) 0.79 (96% TRANSMITTANCE)
SHADING DEVICE 1-5/8" DIAMETER CERAMIC TUBES COLT SHADING LOUVRES
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
77 LIGHTING POWER DENSITY REDUCTION
MODEL INPUTPARAMETER BASELINE DESIGN INPUT PROPOSED DESIGN INPUT
INTERIOR LIGHTINGPOWER DENSITY
1.1 W/M2 .46 W/M2
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PEAK LOAD BASELINEDESIGN
PROPOSEDDESIGN
% REDUCTIONDUE TO GLAZING /
SHADING
PROPOSED WITHREDUCED LIGHTING
POWER DENSITY
% REDUCTIONDUE TO REDUCED
LIGHTING
PEAK COOLINGTOTAL LOAD 21,554.50 19,442.50 9.80 17,090.20 20.71
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
78 SIMULATION RESULTS
(KBTU/H), , ,
PEAK HEATING LOAD(KBTU/H) 22,196.00 16,460.20 25.84 16,460.20 ----
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
20,000.00
25,000.00
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS0.00
5,000.00
10,000.00
15,000.00
kBTU/hPeak Cooling Load
Peak Heating Load
Baseline Shading Reduced LPD
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
79 PV ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
80 PV ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
81 PV ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
82 PV ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
83 PV ANALYSIS SUMMARY
FAÇADE SECTIONCOVERAGE AREA
(FT2)PRODUCTION
KWH/YEARCOST
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
Ç (FT2) KWH/YEAR
EAST FAÇADEFLOORS:5-17 3,575 10,216.53 $214,500
EAST FAÇADEFLOORS:18-54 10,175 207,971.7 $610,500
SOUTH FAÇADEFLOORS:18-54 10,175 381,281.5 $610,500
PRODUCTION CALCULATION INPUT
COST/FT2 $60.00
CONVERSIONEFFICIENCY
16%
INVERTINGPV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
WEST FAÇADEFLOORS:8-54 12,925 484,330.5 $775,500
INVERTINGEFFICIENCY
95%
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
84 PV ANALYSIS SUMMARY
FAÇADE SECTIONCOVERAGE AREA
(FT2)PRODUCTION
KWH/YEARCOST
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
Ç (FT2) KWH/YEAR
EAST FAÇADEFLOORS:5-17 3,575 10,216.53 $214,500
EAST FAÇADEFLOORS:18-54 10,175 207,971.7 $610,500
SOUTH FAÇADEFLOORS:18-54 10,175 381,281.5 $610,500
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
WEST FAÇADEFLOORS:8-54 12,925 484,330.5 $775,500
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
85 PV ANALYSIS SUMMARY
FAÇADE SECTIONCOVERAGE AREA
(FT2)PRODUCTION
KWH/YEARCOST
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
Ç (FT2) KWH/YEAR
EAST FAÇADEFLOORS:5-17 3,575 10,216.53 $214,500
EAST FAÇADEFLOORS:18-54 10,175 207,971.7 $610,500
SOUTH FAÇADEFLOORS:18-54 10,175 381,281.5 $610,500
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
WEST FAÇADEFLOORS:8-54 12,925 484,330.5 $775,500
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
86 PV ANALYSIS SUMMARY
FAÇADE SECTIONCOVERAGE AREA
(FT2)PRODUCTION
KWH/YEARCOST
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
Ç (FT2) KWH/YEAR
EAST FAÇADEFLOORS:5-17 3,575 10,216.53 $214,500
EAST FAÇADEFLOORS:18-54 10,175 207,971.7 $610,500
SOUTH FAÇADEFLOORS:18-54 10,175 381,281.5 $610,500
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
WEST FAÇADEFLOORS:8-54 12,925 484,330.5 $775,500
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
87 PV ANALYSIS SUMMARY
FAÇADE SECTIONCOVERAGE AREA
(FT2)PRODUCTION
KWH/YEARCOST
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
Ç (FT2) KWH/YEAR
EAST FAÇADEFLOORS:5-17 3,575 10,216.53 $214,500
EAST FAÇADEFLOORS:18-54 10,175 207,971.7 $610,500
SOUTH FAÇADEFLOORS:18-54 10,175 381,281.5 $610,500
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
WEST FAÇADEFLOORS:8-54 12,925 484,330.5 $775,500
OBJECTIVE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
88 HYBRID VENTILATION
INVESTIGATE FEASIBILITY AND DESIGN PROCESS OFIMPLEMENTING HYBRID VENTILATION IN THE NEW YORKTIMES BUILDING
DETERMINE IMPACT OF BIM AND ANALYSIS SOFTWARE
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
FOR MIXED-MODE DESIGNPV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PROCESS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
89 HYBRID VENTILATION
LITERATURE REVIEW
CASE-STUDIES
BUILDING CODES & STANDARDS
SINGLE – ZONE MODEL
CURTAIN WALL SELECTION
CONTROL STRATEGY
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
CONTROL STRATEGY
ENERGY SAVINGS & PAYBACK ANALYSIS
CONTROL STRATEGY
BIM IES <VE> MACROFLO INVESTIGATION
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PROCESS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
90 HYBRID VENTILATION
LITERATURE REVIEW
CASE-STUDIES
BUILDING CODES & STANDARDS
SINGLE – ZONE MODEL
CURTAIN WALL SELECTION
CONTROL STRATEGY
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
CONTROL STRATEGY
ENERGY SAVINGS & PAYBACK ANALYSIS
BIM IES <VE> MACROFLO INVESTIGATION
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PROCESS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
91 HYBRID VENTILATION1st January to 31st December
10 10
20 20
30 30
40 40
°C °CDRY BULB TEMPERATURE - New York City, New York - USA
LITERATURE REVIEW
CASE-STUDIES
BUILDING CODES & STANDARDS
SINGLE – ZONE MODEL
CURTAIN WALL SELECTION
CONTROL STRATEGY
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
N OR T H 15°
30°
45°
60°
75°
EASTW EST
285°
300°
315°
330°
345°
10 km/ h
20 km/ h
30 km/ h
40 km/ h
50 km/ h hrs316+2842522211891581269463<31
© W eather T ool
Jan14th28th
Feb14th28th
Mar14th28th
Apr14th28th
May14th28th
Jun14th28th
Jul14th28th
Aug14th28th
Sep14th28th
Oct14th28th
Nov14th28th
Dec14th28th
-10 -10
0 0
10 10
CONTROL STRATEGY
ENERGY SAVINGS & PAYBACK ANALYSIS
BIM IES <VE> MACROFLO INVESTIGATION
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
105°
120°
135°
150°
165°SOU T H195°
210°
225°
240°
255°
PROCESS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
92 HYBRID VENTILATION
LITERATURE REVIEW
CASE-STUDIES
BUILDING CODES & STANDARDS
SINGLE – ZONE MODEL
CURTAIN WALL SELECTION
CONTROL STRATEGY
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
CONTROL STRATEGY
ENERGY SAVINGS & PAYBACK ANALYSIS
BIM IES <VE> MACROFLO INVESTIGATION
COLT COLTLITE LWI VENTILATOR, TYPE LWI
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PROCESS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
93 HYBRID VENTILATION
LITERATURE REVIEW
CASE-STUDIES
BUILDING CODES & STANDARDS
SINGLE – ZONE MODEL
CURTAIN WALL SELECTION
CONTROL STRATEGY
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
CONTROL STRATEGY
ENERGY SAVINGS & PAYBACK ANALYSIS
BIM IES <VE> MACROFLO INVESTIGATION
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PROCESS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
94 HYBRID VENTILATION
LITERATURE REVIEW
CASE-STUDIES
BUILDING CODES & STANDARDS
SINGLE – ZONE MODEL
CURTAIN WALL SELECTION
CONTROL STRATEGY
38
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
CONTROL STRATEGY
ENERGY SAVINGS & PAYBACK ANALYSIS
BIM IES <VE> MACROFLO INVESTIGATION10
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PROCESS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
95 HYBRID VENTILATION
LITERATURE REVIEW
CASE-STUDIES
BUILDING CODES & STANDARDS
SINGLE – ZONE MODEL
CURTAIN WALL SELECTION
CONTROL STRATEGY
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
CONTROL STRATEGY
ENERGY SAVINGS & PAYBACK ANALYSIS
BIM IES <VE> MACROFLO INVESTIGATION
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PROCESS
SINGLE ZONE MODEL
HOURLY TMY-2 WEATHER DATA
LOCAL WIND SPEED DETERMINED
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
96 HYBRID VENTILATION
LITERATURE REVIEW
CASE-STUDIES
BUILDING CODES & STANDARDS
SINGLE – ZONE MODEL
CURTAIN WALL SELECTION
CONTROL STRATEGY
BUOYANCY (STACK EFFECT) AND WIND FLOW RATES
COOLING AND VENTILATION LOADS MET
RESULT
TOTAL OF 18 OPERABLE GLAZING PANELS PER FLOOR
350+ HOURS FEASIBLE
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
CONTROL STRATEGY
ENERGY SAVINGS & PAYBACK ANALYSIS
BIM IES <VE> MACROFLO INVESTIGATION10% REDUCTION IN COOLING LOAD
ANNUAL COST SAVINGS OF $41,548
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
32W IN-GROUND UPLIGHT
51W WIDE FLOOD
50W AREA LUMINAIRE
ENTRANCE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
97 ENTRANCE LIGHTING DESIGN
ENTRANCE
STREETDAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
N
W
SE
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A C S U
32W IN-GROUND UPLIGHT
51W WIDE FLOOD
50W AREA LUMINAIRE
ENTRANCE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
98
A CASE STUDY FOR THE USE OF
BIM / IPD FOR THE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDING
NEW YORK, NY
ENTRANCE
STREETDAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
N
W
SE
32W IN-GROUND UPLIGHT
51W WIDE FLOOD
50W AREA LUMINAIRE
ENTRANCE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
99 ENTRANCE LIGHTING DESIGN
ENTRANCE
STREETDAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
N
W
SE
32W IN-GROUND UPLIGHT
51W WIDE FLOOD
50W AREA LUMINAIRE
ENTRANCE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
100 ENTRANCE LIGHTING DESIGN
ENTRANCE
STREETDAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
N
W
SE
32W IN-GROUND UPLIGHT
51W WIDE FLOOD
50W AREA LUMINAIRE
ENTRANCE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
101
ENTRANCE
STREETDAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
N
W
SE
32W IN-GROUND UPLIGHT
51W WIDE FLOOD
50W AREA LUMINAIRE
ENTRANCE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
102
ENTRANCE
STREETDAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
N
W
SE
32W IN-GROUND UPLIGHT
51W WIDE FLOOD
50W AREA LUMINAIRE
ENTRANCE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
103
ENTRANCE
STREETDAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
N
W
SE
32W IN-GROUND UPLIGHT
51W WIDE FLOOD
50W AREA LUMINAIRE
ENTRANCE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
104 ENTRANCE LIGHTING DESIGN
ENTRANCE
STREETDAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
N
W
SE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
105 FAÇADE LIGHTING DESIGN
51W SPOT FLOOD OR WIDE FLOOD
ENTRANCE
STREETDAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
51W SPOT, FLOOD, OR WIDE FLOODPV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
N
W
SE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
106 FAÇADE LIGHTING DESIGN
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS ENTRANCE
STREET
51W SPOT FLOOD OR WIDE FLOODPV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
N
W
SE
51W SPOT, FLOOD, OR WIDE FLOOD
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
107 FAÇADE LIGHTING DESIGN
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS ENTRANCE
STREET
51W SPOT FLOOD OR WIDE FLOODPV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
N
W
SE
51W SPOT, FLOOD, OR WIDE FLOOD
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
108 FAÇADE LIGHTING DESIGN
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS ENTRANCE
STREET
51W SPOT FLOOD OR WIDE FLOODPV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
N
W
SE
51W SPOT, FLOOD, OR WIDE FLOOD
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
109 FAÇADE LIGHTING DESIGN
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS ENTRANCE
STREET
51W SPOT FLOOD OR WIDE FLOODPV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
N
W
SE
51W SPOT, FLOOD, OR WIDE FLOOD
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
110 EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN SUMMARY
DESIGN SUMMARY ORIGINAL DESIGNASHRAE
ALLOWABLEPROPOSEDREDESIGN
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
ALLOWABLE REDESIGN
WATTAGE 15,710 24,390 3,898
REDUCTION FROMALLOWABLE
35.59% - 84.02%
ENERGY SAVINGS($/YEAR) $6,082.94 - $14,360.79
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
ASSUMING 8 HOURS OF USE PER NIGHT
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
111 CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
TAKE OFFSENVELOPE AREA TAKE-OFFS FROM MODEL
ORIGINAL
APPLY COST DATA TO MODELED FAÇADE FAMILIES
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
112 CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CALCULATE NUMBER OF RODS
PROPOSED LOUVERS AND OPERABLE WINDOWS
APPLY COST DATA TO MODELED LOUVERS AND OPERABLEWINDOW FAMILIES
DIFFERENCES
ORIGINAL CURTAIN WALL: $80,509,220.00
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
CERAMIC RODS: $3,023,640.00
NON-OPERABLE PANELS: $77,156,312.50OPERABLE PANELS: $7,715,812.50
LOUVERS: $11,563,300.00
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
113 FAÇADE CONCLUSIONS
DAYLIGHTING
THERMAL ANALYSISCORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION ARCHITECTURAL PRECEDENTS
PV ANALYSIS
HYBRID VENTILATION
FAÇADE LIGHTING
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CONSTRUCTION IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
114 IPD/BIM LESSONS LEARNED
FACADE
CORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
TENANT
WORK
FLOW
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
CORE
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
115 CONCLUSIONS
CORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
AE DEPARTMENT & FACULTY
THE NEW YORK TIMES BUILDINGBENJAMIN R. BARBEN | CRAIG A. CASEY | NICOLE L. DUBOWSKI | JUSTIN M. MILLER
116 QUESTIONS
FRIENDS & FAMILY
IPD/BIM TEAM 2IPD/BIM TEAM 3
CORE REDESIGN
TENANT REDESIGN
INTRODUCTION
IPD/BIM LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
QUESTIONS
FAÇADE REDESIGN
