AC 09 Conference Proceedings1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 AC 09 Conference Proceedings1

    1/3

    Aquaculture CanadaOM

    2009

    Hybrid Aquaculture Research: the Case of Dedza, Malawi

    Jessica Anderson

    Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC

    Canada, V8W 3R4, (250)-721-6377 ([email protected])

    Abstract

    Recent research acknowledges the natural and social dimensions o

    aquaculture systems. However, studies often create an artificialdivide by attempting to address each aspect in isolation. Socialscience research has tended to overlook the biophysical aspects of

    aquaculture, while scientific research has uncritically acceptedorthodox explanations of environmental outcomes without recognizing the social

    construction of such systems. This research analyses the case of small-scale tilapiaaquaculture in Malawi and presents evidence to support the central argument that aquaculture

    systems must be addressed through hybrid research. The social dimension of this researchreveals that fish farmers in Malawi are rejecting practices which do not work in the local

    context (fertilization with pond mud) and adopting strategies that do work (irrigation withpond water). The physical component of this research compliments the social by elucidating

    that irrigation with pond water resulted in higher soil nutrient and moisture content. It isargued that understanding aquaculture impacts on ecosystems may only be achieved through

    locally-based hybrid research methods that recognize the complex, connected nature of thesesystems.

    f

    Introduction

    Over the last several decades, there has been

    an increased emphasis on understanding thesocial and ecological complexities of rural

    agricultural communities in the globalsouth1. However, research can create an

    artificial divide by attempting to addresseach aspect in isolation. Social science

    research can overlook the biophysicalrealities of rural agricultural systems, while

    research in the natural sciences canuncritically accept conventional

    explanations of environmental processeswithout acknowledging the social

    construction of such systems2.

    By integrating the research philosophies of

    social and ecological sciences, we canaddress these systems in ways that may

    illuminate new understandings and expand

    the range on concepts available. For the

    purposes of this paper, research perspectivesthat challenge the separation of research

    methodologies, and bridge the gap betweensocial and ecological research by

    acknowledging that most research questionsrequire investigation through both social

    and ecological research methods, will bereferred to as hybrid research3. This type of

    research may be especially important foraddressing rural agricultural systems

    because by definition they encompassphenomena that are both social and

    ecological.

    The aim of this research is to contribute to

    the conversation about the ability of hybridresearch to facilitate understandings of

    complex rural agricultural systems. This isattempted not in the abstract, but bysubjecting theoretical claims about hybrid

    AAC Spec. Publ. No. 15 (2009)

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/27/2019 AC 09 Conference Proceedings1

    2/3

    Aquaculture CanadaOM

    2009

    research to the complications of empirical

    analysis, through the case of integratedagriculture-aquaculture (IAA) in Dedza,

    Malawi.

    Methods

    Malawi is one of the poorest countries in theworld, the economy is heavily reliant on

    agriculture and over eighty-five percent ofthe population lives in rural areas4. The

    context of this study was the aftermath of a5 year development project by ConcernUniversal, through which IAA had been

    introduced in Dedza5. In an IAA system,the fish pond is designed to capitalize on

    outputs from the agricultural system, such

    as crop residues, which may otherwise havebeen wasted. In return, the pond producesfish and water for irrigation, thus increasing

    resource efficiency on the farm.

    The social component of this studyconsisted of forty-five semi-structured

    interviews. Participation was based onfarmers willingness to partake in the

    research and their involvement in integratedaquaculture. Qualitative data, collected inopen ended questions, addressed attitudes

    towards the benefits and challengesassociated with fish farming in Dedza. The

    participants were also free to raise subjectsof personal concern or local issues.

    Of the forty-five semi-structured interviews,thirty were randomly selected for soil

    sampling. Composite soil samples werecollected from maize fields that had been

    irrigated with pond water and maize fieldsthat had not. At Bunda College, soil

    samples were immediately analyzed for soilmoisture content and pH. The dried soil

    samples were transported to YorkUniversity, Canada. Total Kjeldahl-N(TKN) content was determined by the

    micro-Kjeldahl digestion procedure6.

    Mehlich 3-extractable P, K+, Zn, Mg2+andCa+ were determined7. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality was performed

    on all data to ensure they met the

    assumption of a normal distribution. One-way ANOVA tests were conducted to

    analyze for differences between land usegroups. Irrigation with pond water was

    used as the variable for comparison.

    Results

    The social component of this studyindicated that fish farmers in Dedza are

    active social agents, capable of evaluatingan agricultural technology in accordancewith their social, economic and

    environmental constraints and adapting itaccordingly. Farmers rejected the practice

    of maize fertilization with pond mud due to

    labour and equipment constraints, despitethe fact that the technique was taught byextension agents and is published as one of

    the benefits of IAA in Dedza5.Alternatively, a method of bucketing pond

    water onto maize crops was developed byfarmers and adopted in order to cope with

    dry soil conditions.

    The physical component of this study builtupon the social results. Soils that had beenirrigated with pond water had significantly

    higher levels of N (P

  • 7/27/2019 AC 09 Conference Proceedings1

    3/3

    Aquaculture CanadaOM

    2009

    realities and the perceptions of local farmers

    impact on the system2.

    Fish farmers in Dedza demonstrated theiragency by modifying pond use in

    accordance with their local needs. Thephysical component of this study confirmed

    that crop irrigation with pond waterincreased soil nutrient and moisture levels.

    Rainfall in Malawi is the most limitingfactor in crop production, making irrigationextremely important8. In order for IAA to

    be a beneficial and sustainable farmingactivity, it must make both social and

    ecological sense in the local context. Byemploying a hybrid research approach,

    nuances of fish farming in Dedza, which

    would have been overlooked using atraditional approach, were exposed.

    It is acknowledged that choosing a researchstrategy is context dependent, and one

    strategy will not always work in everysituation. However, when addressing ruralagricultural systems, a hybrid research

    approach has proven to be a powerful toolthrough which to investigate how local

    adaptations may influence the physicalenvironment and how the physicalenvironment influences local livelihoods. It

    is argued that understanding this type ofsystem may only be achieved through

    locally-based hybrid research methods thatrecognize the complex, connected nature of

    these systems.

    Acknowledgements

    I would like to thank the research

    participants from Dedza, Malawi for sharing

    their time, ideas and experiences with me. Igratefully acknowledge the contributions of

    Timothy Njovu, Emanuel Kaunda, TalyDrezner, Robin Roth and Jackson Langat.

    References

    1. Peet R, Watts M. 1996. LiberationEcologies. Routledge, London.

    2. Batterbury S, Forsyth T, Thomson K.

    1997. Environmental transformations indeveloping countries: hybrid research and

    democratic policy. Geogr J 163(2): 126-132.

    3. Whatmore S. 2002. Hybridgeographies: natures cultures spaces.Sage, London.

    4. National Statistics Office of Malawi.2006. .

    Accessed October 1, 2007.

    5. Concern Universal Malawi AnnualReport 2005-2006. 2006.

    . Accessed

    March 1, 2009.

    6. Bremmer JM, Mulvaney CS. 1982.NitrogenTotal. In, Methods of soil

    analysis (AL Page, ed), pp. 595 624,American Society of Agronomy, Madison.

    7. Mehlich A. 1984. Mehlich 3 soil testextractant: a modification of Mehlich 2extractant. Commun Soil Sci Plan 5(12):

    1409-1416.

    8. Nkhoma BG, Mulwafu WO. 2004. The

    experience of irrigation management

    transfer in two irrigation schemes inMalawi, 1960s2002. Phys Chem Earth PtC29(15-18): 1327-1333.

    AAC Spec. Publ. No. 15 (2009)