Abstract HuttonHHPG

  • Upload
    bijoy82

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Abstract HuttonHHPG

    1/2

    Sixth Hutton Symposium on the Origin of Granitic Rocks

    Some characteristics and a possible genesis of extremelyhigh heat producing Mesoproterozoic granites fromMount Painter Province, South Australia

    K. Kromkhun 1, J. D. Foden2

    1 Geology and Geophysics, University of Adelaide, [email protected] Geology and Geophysics, University of Adelaide, [email protected]

    The Mount Painter (MP) and Mount Babbage

    basement inliers (Figure 1) in the northern

    Flinders Ranges, South Australia, expose

    Mesoproterozoic granites and associated

    felsic volcanics with very high U and Th

    contents. These suites intrude latePalaeoproterozoic sediment-dominated

    basement.

    Figure 1: Location of Mesoproterozoic granite atMount Painter Province, South Australia.

    The high heat production granites (HHPG)

    have heat production values (HP average of

    16 Wm-3) that are 3-4 times those of normal

    granites (Figure 2). Associated volcanic

    rocks and mafic dykes are also characterized

    by high HP (average of 10 and 18 Wm-3,respectively).

    The Yerila granite (YG) in particular

    contains extreme U and Th contents (average

    U of 121 ppm and Th of 422 ppm) with HP

    values up to 112 Wm-3 (average 61.8 Wm-

    3). The Yerila and Mt Neil granites are also

    associated with mafic magmas (quartz

    lamprophyre or diorite) occurring both as

    dykes and as mingled schlieren or enclaves.

    The irregular contact of the hosted mafic

    enclaves and the common K-feldspar

    orientation in both YG and enclave suggests

    magma mingling and mixing. An implied

    petrogenetic relationship is reinforced by the

    mafic suites very high U-Th. Other mafic

    dykes in the area have normal low U-Th

    contents and may be Neoproterozoic.

    Figure 2: Heat production values (values at thetop bar), U and Th contents (values at the belowbar) of I- and S-type granites, A-type granites,Mount Painter granites, Yerila granites and highHP mafic dykes (Stewart and Foden, 2001;unpublished data and this study).

    The YG is typically medium- to coarse-

    grained, with tabular K-feldspar and quartz

    phenocrysts within a quartz, microcline,

    plagioclase, biotite, hornblende groundmass

    and contains abundant accessory mineral

    including zircon, titanite, allanite, fluoriteand apatite. Biotite generally shows damage

    haloes around radioactive minerals. Large

    euhedral allanite shows internal zoning. The

    enclaves and mafic dykes associated with the

    YG are quartz-bearing hornblende-biotite-

    rich lamprophyres or diorites and are K-

    feldspar-plagioclase-phyric with the same

    accessory minerals as the YG.

    The MP granites and volcanics are

    metaluminous to weakly peraluminous. All

    units show A-type and alkaline

    University of Stellenbosch July 2007

  • 7/30/2019 Abstract HuttonHHPG

    2/2

    Sixth Hutton Symposium on the Origin of Granitic Rocks

    characteristics. The SiO2 content of MP

    granites varies from ~65 to 78 wt% while the

    YG is among the most mafic (SiO 2 average

    of 69 wt%). The YG has high K2O, Fe/

    (Fe+Mg) and Rb/Sr. The high HP mafic

    dykes have higher FeO, MgO, MnO, P2O and

    TiO2 (~2.2 wt%TiO2) with lower SiO2 and

    K2O contents than the YG. Incompatible

    trace elements (including HFSE and REE) in

    the YG and the lamprophyre/ diorite dykes

    and enclaves are very enriched. The Th/U

    ratio of both granites and mafic magmas has

    a narrow range averaging ~ 3.24 suggesting

    magmatic control rather than hydrothermal U

    mobilisation.

    A key question is what is the source of the

    Yerila and related MP HHP granites? Basedon preliminary data these granites have initial

    Nd values at 1565Ma that average -2.0

    (McLaren et al, 2006, Stewart and Foden , 2001)

    and are significantly higher than the local

    crust (Nd = -6 to -4), implying a role of a

    mantle-derived component. Very limited data

    on the contemporary mafic samples suggests

    a role for both fractional crystallisation of

    highly enriched mafic parent magmas

    coupled with mixing trends produced by

    mingling between mafic melts and felsic

    differentiates, presumably in upper crustalmagma chambers. SiO2 TiO2 and SiO2-Ce

    variation (Figure3) illustrates these separate

    trends. Both Ti and Ce show initial

    enrichment with silica resulting from

    fractional crystallisation. This is followed by

    rapid Ti and Ce decline with further silica

    enrichment due to allanite and titanite

    saturation. The YG suite mostly falls on this

    part of the fractionation trend. By contrast

    many of the other MP HHG series define

    linear mixing trends due to back-mingling

    with mafic parents.

    Figure 3:Bivariant plots of TiO2 (wt%) and Ce

    (ppm) versus SiO2 (wt%) showing fractionationcrystallisation of allanite and titanite

    Our interim conclusion is that the HHP

    granite suite is derived by fractional

    crystallisation from a parental mafic magma

    that is unusually incompatible element

    enriched. The source of this magma is

    probably in the sub-continental lithospheric

    mantle. Future work using Nd-Sm and U-Pb

    isotopic data will be used to further define

    this unusual mantle source and to determine

    the age of enrichment.

    The magma system probably evolved as a

    series of stacked chambers in which

    crystallisation occurred with periodic

    replenishment by new mafic magma batches.

    References

    McLaren, S., Sandiford, M., Powell, R., Neumann, N., and Woodhead, J., 2006, Palaeozoic intraplate crustalanatexis in the Mount Painter Province, South Australia: Timing, thermal budgets and the role ofcrustal heat production: Journal of Petrology, v. 47, p. 2281-2302.

    Stewart, K. & Foden, J., 2001. Mesozoic granites of South Australia. University of Adelaide; Primary Industriesand Resources SA.

    University of Stellenbosch July 2007