Upload
marquis-jarrell
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What’s in a name?
• Indian-historical term, not politically correct• Native- a person who was born in a particular
place• First Nations-refers to only certain groups, not
including Métis or Inuit• Aboriginal Peoples-all encompassing
Contact- 1700’s
The arrival of Samuel de Champlain, the father of New France, on the site of Quebec City
GBR wins ‘7 year war’. Royal proclamation confirms GBR / Aboriginal relations
1867- Confederation (BNA Act)
• Canadian expansion 1869• Imposed Canadian sovereignty• 1869 Red River Rebellion• Led by Louis Riel• Hanged for treason on
November 16th, 1885
1876-The Indian Act
‘Indian Agents’ assigned to First Nations peopleFirst nations people are “encouraged” to move into reservations (far
from traditional hunting ground and resources)
This is a picture of “the mush hole”. It is the name given to the Mohawk Institute located in Brantford. This is about 45 minutes away from here.
• Most children were seven years old when they arrived• Children were forbidden from speaking their own
language• There was almost no contact with their families (once
a year, maybe)• Living conditions were inhumane (bad food, improper
clothing, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse)
• This went on for over 100 years. That is over four generations.
• In 1907 Dr. P. Bryce, Chief Medical Officer of the Dept. of Indian Affairs, reports that at least 25% of students who have attended residential schools have died
At the turn of the centuryWho is included in this picture? Who is missing?
What vision of Canada is it promoting?How does this cartoon represent colonization?
1910s• 35% of Aboriginal men
enlist for WW1
• The 1911 census shows Aboriginal population at their lowest recorded point in history (106,000)
• Treaties being signed
1920’s & 1930’s• Ceremonies banned
(potlatch and sun dance)
• No national Aboriginal organization allowed
• Longhouse government banned and impose elected band council
• 70 residential schools in operation
1940’s & 1950’s
Aboriginal participation in WWII is high
Tommy Prince (shown right) becomes most decorated Aboriginal soldier in WWII
1950- Indian Act overhauled with Aboriginal participation
1960’s & 1970’s
“Indians” get the right to vote (1960)
Creation of National Indian Brotherhood (later Assembly of First Nations)
Federal White Paper recommends termination of treaties and Indian status
• Minister of Indian Affairs Jean Chretien proposes the abolition of the Indian Act
• Rejection of all land claims
• Assimilation of First Nations people
• Status the same as other ethnic minorities rather than a distinct group
White Paper- 1969
As of December 2005, this is the list of land claims that are still not settled:-Under Review: 626-Under Negotiation: 122-In Active Litigation: 71-In the Indian Specific Claims Commission Process: 35-Other not settled: 192-TOTAL UNSETTLED: 1046-Claims Settled since 1973: 272
1927 Aboriginals cannot hire lawyers for land claims
Indian Act amended to block effective court action.
1931 Native Brotherhood formed.
Aboriginals begin to organize.
1949 First Nations can vote in BC (but not Canada)
After fighting for Canada in WWI and WWII,First Nations can finally vote.Japanese also get the vote.
WOMEN: 1920 (federal)
Some groups, such as Doukhabours (1953), still cannot vote.
1951 Parliament repeals anti-potlatch laws & anti-land claims laws
1960 First Nations can vote in Canadian elections.
Living standardsfor aboriginalsstill far belowthe rest of the population.
1950s Inuit population relocated
In a bid to “protect” Canada’s sovereignty over the high north, federal government relocates Inuit families from northern Quebec to the Arctic. Many die.
1990 Sparrow Decision (Supreme Court)
Musqueam people argue that they have the right to fish and have ceremonial food. Supreme court agrees.
1995 Gustafson Lake standoff
Shuswap nation want their sacred land and recognition of their sovereign rights. RCMP launch large military operation, firing 77,000 rounds of ammo, killing a dog and injuring a woman.
15 people sent to jail.
Gustafsen B.C.
• Police and Secwepemc First Nation • Land dispute ended in gunfire• Negotiations failed, police operation
launched• Police set up land mines around armed
Secwepemc camp • Activists surrender September 1995• Long trial – 39 acquittals, 21 convictions• Conditions improve by 2000
Ipperwash• Also September 1995 • Land dispute from 1942• Small group of protesters occupy the provincial park• Protesting slow pace of land claims and destruction of sacred burial ground• Police move in – Dudley George shot and killed• Land recovered• Police used excessive force• Officer convicted of criminal negligence• Official report finally published – after change of government – Harris refused an
inquiry• OPP and provincial government share in the responsibility of George’s deathAdd• Inquiry wasn’t held until there was a change in the provincial government – Harris
refused• Inquiry only finished in August 2006• Several OPP officers exhibit racist behaviour (taped) – go for sensitivity training• Harris – “get those fucking Indians out of my park”
Ipperwash
http://youtu.be/SZVMw8gc4W0
Use the link below to watch the video if the movie does not play.
Self Determination• 2000 Nisga’a land claim settlement• 2,000 square kilometres of land
in the Nass valley• 300,000 cubic decameter water
reservation • First formal treaty signed by a First
Nation since the Douglas treaties of 1854
The green represents the original land claim. The orange and purple is the actual land that the Nisga’a received.
The next slide is a programme in the Cree language where young people from Davis Inlet talk about their experiences sniffing glue and propane.
2007
• Saskatchewan became the first province in Canada to proclaim June as Aboriginal History Month
UN Declaration• 2006- Canada votes against
adopting the draft document: “vague and ambiguous, leaving it open to different, and possibly competing, interpretations.”
• 2007, Canada is 1 of 4 countries to vote against adopting document
• 2010 Canada signs on despite noting that its “concerns are well known and remain”
• The document is non-binding