Upload
doandung
View
235
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AASHTOAASHTO’’s LRFD Specifications for s LRFD Specifications for Foundation and Earth Retaining Foundation and Earth Retaining
Structure DesignStructure Design
(Through 2007 Interims and Beyond)(Through 2007 Interims and Beyond)
Jerry A. DiMaggio, P.E.Jerry A. DiMaggio, P.E.Principal Bridge/Geotechnical EngineerPrincipal Bridge/Geotechnical Engineer
FHWA, Washington D. C. FHWA, Washington D. C.
Existing SpecificationsExisting Specifications
StandardStandard1717thth EditionEdition
LRFD LRFD now thenow the
““44””thth EditionEdition
““AASHTO and FHWA AASHTO and FHWA have agreed that all have agreed that all state DOTstate DOT’’s will use s will use LRFD for design of LRFD for design of NEW structures by NEW structures by
2007.2007.””
0-2-2NE60%
MO
TN NC
VA
WV80%
PA100%
NY 50%
ME100%
IA 5%
IL5%
KY
FL100%
GATX
13%
OK 100%
KS50%
OH
WA100%
OR100%
WI
CA
CO 90%
SC50%
NJ
MA
CTDEMD
VT 5%
MN 40%
MI
INUT 75%
ND
SD 10%
ID 100% WY
NMAZ
NV
MT 35%
AR 5%
LA
MS AL
NH
RI
0-24 -100-2-2NE
MO
TN NCVA
WV
PA
NY
ME
IA IL
KY
FL
GATX
OK
KSOH
WA
OR WI
CA
AASHTO LRFD SurveyAASHTO LRFD SurveyMay 2005May 2005
CO
SC
VT
MN
MI
INUT
ND
SD ID WY
NMAZ
NV
MT
AR
LAMS AL
AK 95%AK
HI
PRFull Implementation50-90% Partial Implementation
1-10% Partial ImplementationNo Implementation
26-50% Partial Implementation11-25% Partial Implementation
Superstructure: LRFD
Substructure: LRFD/ASDFoundations: ASD
Earthwork and walls: ASD
Reasons for Not AdoptingReasons for Not Adopting
•• Human nature.Human nature.•• No perceived benefits.No perceived benefits.•• Unfamiliarity with LRFD methods.Unfamiliarity with LRFD methods.•• Lack of confidence in the computed Lack of confidence in the computed
results. results. •• Perceived errors and inconsistencies. Perceived errors and inconsistencies. •• A specification that did not reflect A specification that did not reflect
current design practices.current design practices.
What is AASHTO/FHWA doing?What is AASHTO/FHWA doing?
•• Bridge Design examples.Bridge Design examples.•• NHI LRFD Training Courses.NHI LRFD Training Courses.•• FHWA Technical Assistance.FHWA Technical Assistance.•• FHWA/ NCHRP Calibration efforts.FHWA/ NCHRP Calibration efforts.•• AASHTO Section 11 and 10 AASHTO Section 11 and 10
Revisions. Revisions. •• AASHTO TAASHTO T--15 Continues to refine 15 Continues to refine
and develop the spec. details.and develop the spec. details.
Bridge Design ExamplesBridge Design Examples
http://http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/lrfd/examples.htmwww.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/lrfd/examples.htm
ConcreteConcrete SteelSteel
NHI LRFD Training CoursesNHI LRFD Training Courses
Course 130082Course 130082LRFD for Highway LRFD for Highway
Bridge Substructures Bridge Substructures and Earth Retaining and Earth Retaining
Structures Structures
FHWA/ NCHRP ActivitiesFHWA/ NCHRP Activities• NCHRP Project 12-66, Specifications
for Serviceability in the Design of Bridge Foundations
• NCHRP Report 507, Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) for Deep Foundations
• NCHRP 20-7 activities.
FHWA/ NCHRP ActivitiesFHWA/ NCHRP Activities
• Publication No. FHWA-NHI-05-052, Development of Geotechnical Resistance Factors and DowndragLoad Factors for LRFD Foundation Strength Limit State Design
Revisions to Section 10Revisions to Section 10•• Compiled by a Technical Expert PanelCompiled by a Technical Expert Panel•• Review and input from A Technical Review and input from A Technical
Working Group (TWG)Working Group (TWG)•• Accepted by AASHTO Subcommittee Accepted by AASHTO Subcommittee
TT--15 in June 2005 in Newport, Rhode 15 in June 2005 in Newport, Rhode IslandIsland
•• First published in 2006 InterimFirst published in 2006 Interimhttp://bridges.transportation.org
Topics IncludedTopics Included•• Subsurface Subsurface
investigationsinvestigations•• Soil and rock propertiesSoil and rock properties•• Shallow foundationsShallow foundations•• Driven pilesDriven piles•• Drilled shaftsDrilled shafts•• Rigid and flexible Rigid and flexible
culvertsculverts•• AbutmentsAbutments•• Walls (most types)Walls (most types)
•• Integral abutmentsIntegral abutments•• Micropiles (added 2007)Micropiles (added 2007)•• Augercast pilesAugercast piles•• Soil nailsSoil nails•• Reinforced slopesReinforced slopes•• All soil and rock All soil and rock
earthwork features. earthwork features. ==========================================•• There are also AASHTO There are also AASHTO
LRFD CONSTRUCTION LRFD CONSTRUCTION SPECS. (driven, drilled SPECS. (driven, drilled and and micropilesmicropiles).).
Topics NOT IncludedTopics NOT Included
Section 10 ContentsSection 10 Contents10.1 SCOPE 10.1 SCOPE 10.2 DEFINITIONS10.2 DEFINITIONS10.3 NOTATION10.3 NOTATION10.4 SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES10.4 SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES10.5 LIMIT STATES AND RESISTANCE FACTORS10.5 LIMIT STATES AND RESISTANCE FACTORS10.6 SPREAD FOOTINGS10.6 SPREAD FOOTINGS10.7 DRIVEN PILES10.7 DRIVEN PILES10.8 DRILLED SHAFTS10.8 DRILLED SHAFTS
PROPERTY INFOPROPERTY INFO
NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGENO SIGNIFICANT CHANGEUPDATEDUPDATEDUPDATED, CONSISTANTUPDATED, CONSISTANT
REORGANIZED,REORGANIZED,NEW CONTENTNEW CONTENT
NEW CONTENTNEW CONTENT
Section 10.4 Soil and Rock PropertiesSection 10.4 Soil and Rock Properties
GEC 5GEC 5Sabatini, 2002Sabatini, 2002
Subsurface Subsurface InvestigationsInvestigationsMayne, 2002Mayne, 2002
Section 10.4 Soil and Rock PropertiesSection 10.4 Soil and Rock Properties
•• Soil Strength Soil Strength •• Soil Deformation Soil Deformation •• Rock Mass Strength Rock Mass Strength •• Rock Mass Deformation Rock Mass Deformation •• Erodibility of rockErodibility of rock
10.4.6 SELECTION OF DESIGN PROPERTIES10.4.6 SELECTION OF DESIGN PROPERTIES
NEW!
NEW!
Section 10.5 Limit States and Section 10.5 Limit States and Resistance FactorsResistance Factors
•• Resistance factors revised Resistance factors revised •• Additional discussion on the basis for Additional discussion on the basis for
resistance factorsresistance factors•• Additional discussion of extreme event Additional discussion of extreme event
considerationsconsiderations
Articles 3.4.1 and 3.11.8Articles 3.4.1 and 3.11.8
MaximumMaximum MinimumMinimumPiles, Piles, αα--methodmethod 1.41.4 0.250.25Piles, Piles, λλ--methodmethod 1.051.05 0.300.30
Drilled Shafts, O'Neill Drilled Shafts, O'Neill and Reese (1999)and Reese (1999)
1.251.25 0.350.35
DowndragDowndrag•• Methods for computingMethods for computing•• Load FactorsLoad Factors•• Use of minimum load factors clarifiedUse of minimum load factors clarified
Section 10.6 Spread FootingsSection 10.6 Spread FootingsEccentricity provisions clarifiedEccentricity provisions clarified
BB′′ = B = B –– 2e2eBB
LL′′ = L = L –– 2e2eLL
Q = P/(BQ = P/(B’’ LL’’)) ML MB
LB
eB e L
B’ L’
P
q
Applies to Applies to geotechnical design geotechnical design for settlement and for settlement and bearing resistancebearing resistance
Section 10.6 Spread FootingsSection 10.6 Spread Footings
Hough methodHough method
Elastic Settlement of Elastic Settlement of cohesionlesscohesionless soilssoils
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛ +=
vo
vvoc σ'
Δσσ'logC'1HΔH
Section 10.6 Spread FootingsSection 10.6 Spread Footings
qqnn = c = c NNcmcm + + γγ DDff NNqmqm CCwqwq + 0.5 + 0.5 γγ B B NNγγmm CCww γγ
NOMINAL RESISTANCENOMINAL RESISTANCE
NNcc ssc c iicc NNqq ssq q ddqq iiqq N N γγ s s γγ i i γγ
Shape Correction FactorsShape Correction Factors
COHESIONCOHESIONUNIT WEIGHTUNIT WEIGHT
DEPTHDEPTH WIDTHWIDTH
Bearing Capacity FactorsBearing Capacity FactorsInclination FactorsInclination FactorsShear through overburden Shear through overburden correction factorcorrection factor
Water table correctionWater table correctionSettlement correction factors removedSettlement correction factors removed
Section 10.7 Driven PilesSection 10.7 Driven PilesSettlement of pile groupsSettlement of pile groups
4 new diagrams4 new diagrams
From:From:HanniganHannigan (2005)(2005)
Section 10.7 Driven PilesSection 10.7 Driven Piles
HHtt
QQtt
MMtt
PP
yy
The PThe P--y method specified y method specified for horizontal deflection for horizontal deflection and wedge strain for and wedge strain for ““shortshort”” pilespiles
Section 10.7 Driven PilesSection 10.7 Driven Piles
Original cu
rve
Original cu
rvePP
yyModified curve
Modified curve
PPmm * P* P
PP
Spacing (S)Spacing (S) Row 1Row 1 Row 2Row 2 Row 3Row 33D3D 0.70.7 0.50.5 0.350.355D5D 1.01.0 0.850.85 0.70.7
PP--multiplier (Pmultiplier (Pmm))DD
SS
Section 10.7 Driven PilesSection 10.7 Driven PilesField determination of nominal resistanceField determination of nominal resistance
Static load testStatic load test Dynamic load testDynamic load test
Section 10.7 Driven PilesSection 10.7 Driven PilesStatic analysis methodsStatic analysis methods
•• NordlundNordlund ––Thurman method Thurman method addedadded
Section 10.7 Driven PilesSection 10.7 Driven PilesStatic analysis methodsStatic analysis methods
•• Primary use is for pile length estimation Primary use is for pile length estimation for contract drawings and feasibility.for contract drawings and feasibility.
•• Secondary use for estimation of Secondary use for estimation of downdragdowndrag, , uplift resistance and scour effectsuplift resistance and scour effects
•• Should rarely be used as sole means of Should rarely be used as sole means of determining pile resistance. ONLY IN determining pile resistance. ONLY IN SPECIAL SITUATIONS!SPECIAL SITUATIONS!
Section 10.7 Driven PilesSection 10.7 Driven Piles
Requirements for Requirements for driveabilitydriveability analysis analysis have been added and have been added and clarifiedclarified
Section 10.7 Driven PilesSection 10.7 Driven Piles
NEW!10.7.3.2 10.7.3.2 PILE LENGTH ESTIMATES FOR PILE LENGTH ESTIMATES FOR
CONTRACT DOCUMENTSCONTRACT DOCUMENTS10.7.6 10.7.6 Determination of minimum pile Determination of minimum pile
penetrationpenetration
NEW!
Section 10.8 Drilled shaftsSection 10.8 Drilled shaftsRefers to driven piles section where possibleRefers to driven piles section where possible•• DowndragDowndrag•• Group settlementGroup settlement•• Horizontal displacement (single and group)Horizontal displacement (single and group)•• Lateral squeezeLateral squeeze•• Water table and buoyancyWater table and buoyancy•• ScourScour•• Group resistance (cohesive soil only)Group resistance (cohesive soil only)•• Uplift (group and load test sections)Uplift (group and load test sections)•• BucklingBuckling•• Extreme event limit stateExtreme event limit state
Section 10.8 Drilled shaftsSection 10.8 Drilled shafts•• Static analysis methods Static analysis methods
for soil and rock have for soil and rock have been updatedbeen updated
•• Consideration of both Consideration of both base and side base and side resistance in rock is resistance in rock is now includednow included
OO’’Neill and Reese (1999)Neill and Reese (1999)Currently being updated by Currently being updated by
FHWA.FHWA.
Section 10.8 Drilled shaftsSection 10.8 Drilled shaftsA + BA + B
QQPP
QQSS
DisplacementDisplacement
Res
ista
nce
Res
ista
nce
Side ResistanceSide Resistance
Tip ResistanceTip Resistance
Total ResistanceTotal Resistance
BBCCDD
AA
A + DA + D
B + CB + C
ConclusionConclusion
Future EnhancementsFuture EnhancementsOverall stabilityOverall stability•• Weight is both a load and a resistanceWeight is both a load and a resistance•• Service limit state (should be strength Service limit state (should be strength
limit state)limit state) +
WWTTWWTT
WWTT WWTT
NN NNTT
TT
TT TTll ll
ccll ccllN tan N tan φφ
N tan N tan φφ
Future EnhancementsFuture EnhancementsInclination FactorsInclination Factors•• Ignored by many practicing engineersIgnored by many practicing engineers•• Based on small scale tests and theoryBased on small scale tests and theory•• Effect of embedment (Effect of embedment (DDff))•• Resistance factors are for vertical loadResistance factors are for vertical load
Q
Df
Future EnhancementsFuture Enhancements
Nominal bearing resistance of rockNominal bearing resistance of rock•• Very little guidance availableVery little guidance available•• CSIR Rock Mass Rating System proposedCSIR Rock Mass Rating System proposed•• CSIR developed for tunnel designCSIR developed for tunnel design•• Includes life safety considerations and Includes life safety considerations and
therefore, margin of safetytherefore, margin of safety•• May be conservative depending on what May be conservative depending on what
your existing practice has been.your existing practice has been.
Future EnhancementsFuture Enhancements
Pile head fixityPile head fixity•• Connection detailsConnection details•• Effects of axial loadsEffects of axial loads
H HV
Future EnhancementsFuture Enhancements
Serviceability limitsServiceability limitsNCHRP 12NCHRP 12--66 66 Due April 2006 very late. Due April 2006 very late.
Nearing completion June Nearing completion June 2007.2007.
ΔΔxx
ΔΔzz
What Should I Know and Do?What Should I Know and Do?
•• Become familiar with BOTH the Become familiar with BOTH the AASHTO standard specifications AASHTO standard specifications and LRFD specs.and LRFD specs.
•• Develop an understanding of your Develop an understanding of your agencyagency’’s current design practice s current design practice
What Should I Know and Do?What Should I Know and Do?
•• Develop and compare results for Develop and compare results for SEVERAL example problems with SEVERAL example problems with LRFD and YOUR standard design LRFD and YOUR standard design practicepractice
•• Translate your current practice to an Translate your current practice to an LRFD formatLRFD format
What Should I Know and Do?What Should I Know and Do?•• Whenever possible perform some less Whenever possible perform some less
of comparative designsof comparative designs•• Communicate your findings to Communicate your findings to
AASHTOAASHTO’’s Subcommittee Ts Subcommittee T--15 Chair 15 Chair or members, certainly to your client.or members, certainly to your client.
AASHTO Section 11AASHTO Section 11
• Design specifications for:• Conventional
gravity/semigravity walls• Non-gravity cantilevered walls• Anchored walls• Mechanically Stabilized Earth
(MSE) walls• Prefabricated modular walls
LRFD Specifications for LRFD Specifications for Foundation/ Earth Retaining Foundation/ Earth Retaining
Structure DesignStructure Design
Questions? Questions?