20
How Risky is It? An assessment of the relative risk of engaging in potentially unsafe driving behaviors

AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

  • Upload
    calder

  • View
    45

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

How Risky is It? An assessment of the relative risk of engaging in potentially unsafe driving behaviors. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. Established in 1947 501 (c)(3) Not-For-Profit Research affiliate of AAA/CAA North American Focus. Mission. Identify traffic safety problems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

How Risky is It? An assessment of the relative risk of engaging in potentially

unsafe driving behaviors

Page 2: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

• Established in 1947

• 501 (c)(3) Not-For-Profit

• Research affiliate of AAA/CAA

• North American Focus

Page 3: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

Mission

• Identify traffic safety problems

• Foster research that seeks solutions

• Disseminate information and educational materials

Page 4: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

Funded through the generosity

of

and its members

Page 5: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

Published December 2006Published December 2006

Prepared by:Prepared by:

Virginia Tech Virginia Tech Transportation Transportation

InstituteInstitute

Available online at:Available online at:

www.aaafoundation.org

Page 6: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

Purpose of Study

• Perform additional analysis of data collected under previous 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study to investigate impacts of various behaviors on crash risk

• Behaviors studied:– speeding– drowsy driving– aggressive driving– distracted driving

Page 7: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study

• $3 Million study sponsored by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Virginia DOT, and Virginia Tech

• Conducted by Virginia Tech Transportation Institute

• Collected unprecedented level of driving data pre-crash and normal driving behavior

Page 8: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

100-Car Study “Naturalistic” Approach

• Used in-vehicle camera and custom-built advanced “black box” to monitor drivers– 100 equipped vehicles– 12-13 months of data collection, no “experimenter”

present– Subjects not “coached,” instructed to drive “as usual”– Instrumentation was unobtrusive and inconspicuous to

other drivers, but not invisible– NHTSA-sponsored work indicates subjects’ driving

was uninfluenced by in-vehicle monitoring after the first few hours (out of 12-13 months)

Page 9: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

100-Car Study Equipment

Driver Face Camera

Forward Road Camera

“Black Box”

Page 10: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

100-Car Study Camera Views

Page 11: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

100-Car Study Camera Views

Page 12: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

100-Car Study Participants

• 109 primary drivers– Ages 18-68– 60% male, 40% female– Recruited in Washington DC & Northern VA– Range from “very safe” to “very unsafe”– Wide range of driving mileage– Drove on all road classes– Mostly urban & suburban driving, some rural– Drove sedans and SUVs– Also 132 secondary drivers

Page 13: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

100-Car Study Database Statistics

Captured data on:

• 42,300 hours and ~2 million miles of driving• 82 Crashes and collisions

– Defined as any contact between the subject vehicle and another vehicle, object, pedestrian, cyclist, or animal

• 761 Near crashes – Defined as a conflict situation requiring a rapid, severe evasive

maneuver to avoid a crash

• 8,295 Incidents– Conflict requiring an evasive maneuver, but of less magnitude

than a near crash

• 20,000 normal baseline driving epochs– To compare driver behavior during normal driving to behavior

leading up to crashes, near crashes, and incidents

Page 14: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

This Study

• Investigated the frequency with which drivers engage in various potentially risky behaviors during ordinary driving and immediately prior to crashes, near-crashes, and incidents

• Analyzed the impacts of various behaviors on the risk of being involved in a crash or near-crash

Page 15: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

Results – Frequency of Behaviors

BehaviorCrashes & Near-crashes

Baseline epochs

Inappropriate Speed

(faster than surrounding traffic)8.8% 2.6%

Drowsy 12.5% 4.3%

Aggressive Driving 17.6% 3.0%

Eyes Off Road

(longer than 2 seconds)24.5% 14.1%

Page 16: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

Results – Risk of Crash or Near Crash

Behavior Odds Ratio

Inappropriate Speed

(faster than surrounding traffic)

2.9 (95% CI: 1.7 – 4.8)

Drowsy 2.9 (95% CI: 2.0 – 4.3)

Aggressive Driving 2.1 (95% CI: 1.3 – 3.4)

Eyes Off Road

(longer than 2 seconds)1.9 (95% CI: 1.4 – 2.5)

Note: Odds of crash or near-crash with behavior present vs. absent; computed using logistic regression to control for other behaviors; odds ratio > 1 indicates increased risk

Page 17: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

Conclusions

• The odds of being involved in a crash are nearly tripled when driving while drowsy or driving faster than surrounding traffic.

• The odds of being involved in a crash are approximately doubled when driving aggressively or when looking away from the road for longer than 2 seconds.

Page 18: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

For more information on the 100-Car Study, please go to:

http://www.vtti.vt.edu and click on 100-Car Study

Or go to:

http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/newDriverDistraction.html

Page 19: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

For more information about this study sponsored by the AAA

Foundation for Traffic Safety,

please go to:

www.aaafoundation.org

Page 20: AAA Foundation for  Traffic Safety

The AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety is a 501(c)(3) public charity located in Washington, DC that is dedicated to saving lives and reducing injuries.

It is supported by donations from AAA/CAA Clubs, AAA/CAA members, and other organizations associated with AAA/CAA.