Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IJR International Journal of Railway
Vol. 9, No. 2 / December 2016, pp. 41-45
Vol. 9, No. 2 / December 2016 − 41 −
The Korean Society for Railway
A Study on Improvement of Operation Efficiency of Magnetic Levitation
Train Using Linear Induction Motor
Sang Uk Park*, Chan Yong Zun*, Doh-Young Park**, Jaewon Lim** and Hyung Soo Mok†
Abstract
In this paper, a study on the efficiency improvement of the magnetic levitation train using the LIM (Linear Induction
Motor) was presented. The maglev train has the advantage of being environmentally friendly since much less noise and
dust is produced. However, due to structural limitation, compared to a rotating induction motor, linear induction motor,
the main propulsion engine of the maglev train has a relatively greater air gap and hence has the lower operation effi-
ciency. In this paper, the relationship between the operating condition of the train and the slip frequency has been inves-
tigated to find out the optimum slip frequency that might improve the efficiency of the magnetic levitation train with
linear induction motor. The slip frequency is variable during the operation by this relationship only within a range that
does not affect the levitation system of the train. After that, the comparison of the efficiency between the conventional
control method with the slip frequency fixed at 13.5[Hz] and the proposed method with the slip frequency variable from
9.5[Hz] to 6.5[Hz] has been conducted by simulation using Simplorer. Experiments of 19.5[ton] magnetic levitation
trains owned by Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials were carried out to verify the simulation results.
Keywords: Linear induction motor, Propulsion control, Slip frequency, railroad car, ATO, Auto train operation
1. Introduction
The concentration of jobs in metropolitan area and the
distribution of population to satellite cities is still on going.
Accordingly, medium-distance and short-distance trans-
portation systems became important parts of modern soci-
ety. Magnetic levitation train, which has the advantages of
low noise, less dust and environmental friendly is being
developed actively. In this paper, study deals with the
improvement of the efficiency of the magnetic levitation
train with linear induction motor.
The linear induction motor is similar in fundamental
principle but different in structure to the rotary induction
motor. Unlike conventional induction motor which has
round, cylindrical shape, the linear induction motor has a
straight arrangement where the rail takes the role of the
rotor and the train takes the role of stator. In such arrange-
ment, several problems occur which is not the case in
rotary motor structure. Linear induction motors have finite
primary and secondary length, which generates end-
effects. While the operation, normal force is created per-
pendicular to the rail and counteract the levitation force,
†
*
**
Corresponding author: Konkuk University, Korea
E-mail : [email protected]
Konkuk University, Korea
Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials, Korea
ⓒThe Korean Society for Railway 2016
https://doi.org/10.7782/IJR.2016.9.2.041
Fig. 1. Linear Induction motor
− 42 −
Sang Uk Park, Chan Yong Zun, Doh-Young Park, Jaewon Lim and Hyung Soo Mok / IJR, 9(2), 41-45, 2016
makes levitation difficult and unstable. Thus, the slip fre-
quency, the factor that decides the normal force is fixed to
13.5[Hz] to minimize the effect of the normal force and
this further decreases efficiency.
To minimize the disadvantages of the linear induc-
tion motor, this paper proposed variable slip frequency
drive control strategy which allows the slip frequency
to vary within a certain range but doesn’t affect the
levitation control too much. There are some works
associated with improvement of efficiency of linear
induction motor for maglev train have been done by
varying slip frequency. But few of them deals with slip
frequency that is constantly changing according to
operating condition.
In this paper, with in a range that doesn’t affect the
levitation system, the optimum slip frequency at each
operating point is proposed based on rms current con-
trol. By applying ATO (Auto Train Operation) system,
the cumulative power consumptions of both fixed slip
frequency operation and variable slip frequency opera-
tion are calculated and compared to prove the efficiency
improvement.
2. Structure and Operation Characteristics of Maglev Train
2.1 Structure of maglev train
As shown in Fig 2, a magnetic levitation train using
LIM is mainly consists of a levitation system that gener-
ates levitation force to allow train to leviate and propul-
sion system which generates both propulsion force
horizontal to the rail and normal force perpendicular to
the rail at opposite direction to levitation force. The levi-
tation force must powerful enough to overcome and bal-
ance the weight of the train plus the normal force,
otherwise the levitation fails. The normal force must be
controlled with in a range that doesn’t affect the levita-
tion system.
2.2 Operating condition and slip frequency
2.2.1 Notch command
The propulsion force of the maglev train with LIM is
controlled by stator current and the current reference is
given by the notch command. As shown in Table 1 and
Table 2, the notch commands have 4 levels for accelera-
tion and 7 levels for deceleration. The notch number goes
higher with greater propulsion force or braking force. In
this manner, the operating condition of the train can be
controlled notch commands.
2.2.2 Slip frequency
Fig. 3 (a) illustrated the relationship between slip fre-
quency and normal force. For the same notch command,
the normal force increases with decreasing slip frequency,
and, the normal force increases when the notch level steps
up. Fig. 3 (b) shows the relationship between slip fre-
quency and efficiency. Efficiency goes higher with lower
slip frequency under the same notch command, and goes
lower when notch command steps up.
Fig. 4 shows the actual experiment result of train a trav-
eling at 50[km/h] with slip frequency changed by notch
command based on relationship shown in Fig. 3. Under
the same operating condition(P4_B7), the cumulative
power consumption was 1,352[kWh] for 13.5[Hz] slip fre-
quency and 1,142[kWh] for 10.5[Hz] slip frequency. The
0.21[kWh] of energy saving by lowering slip frequency
implies 15.5[%] of efficiency improvement, verifies the
conclusion that efficiency can be improved by lowering
the slip frequency.Fig. 2. Structure of the linear induction motor
Table 1. Notch pattern for propulsion force
NotchPropulsion Force
[%]
Slip Frequency
[Hz]
P4 100
13.5
~ 6.5
P3 75
P2 50
P1 30
Table 2. Notch pattern for braking force
NotchBraking Force
[%]
Slip Frequency
[Hz]
B7 100
13.5
~ 6.5
B6 85
B5 72
B4 56
B3 42
B2 28
B1 15
A Study on Improvement of Operation Efficiency of Magnetic Levitation Train Using Linear Induction Motor
− 43 −
2.2.3 Speed
Fig. 5 (a) shows the relationship between the speed of
train and the normal force with slip frequency fixed at
12.5[Hz]. Normal force increases with the speed decreases
and at a certain speed, normal force increases when the
notch level steps up. Fig. 5 (b) shows the relationship
between speed and normal force under the same condition
as Figure (a), The efficiency decreases with speed
decreases.
From Figs. 3, 4 and 5, we can draw a conclusion that:
● Small slip frequency brings better efficiency● Efficiency can be changed by operating condition.
Based on these two conclusions, it is possible change the
slip frequency according to operating condition during the
operation in order to make the train running with best effi-
ciency. Note that the slip frequency must be restricted
within a range that doesn’t affect the levitation system.
3. Simulation
3.1 Simulation condition
The train in this experiment was ran by ATO (Auto
Train Operation) system. The ATO system, which is
adopted in actual operation, automatically controls the
train to accelerate, decelerate and stop between each sta-
tion, respond to continuous change of operation pattern.
Fig. 6 shows the speed pattern and notch command pat-
Fig. 3. Characteristics according to the slip frequency
Fig. 4. Comparative efficiency according to the slip frequency
Fig. 5. Characteristics according to the speed
− 44 −
Sang Uk Park, Chan Yong Zun, Doh-Young Park, Jaewon Lim and Hyung Soo Mok / IJR, 9(2), 41-45, 2016
tern of actual experiment, where the blue curve represents
speed and the black curve represents the notch command
pattern.
Two simulations have been conducted to compare cumu-
lative power consumption between fixed and variable slip
frequency drive. The fixed slip frequency is 12.5[Hz],
while the variable slip frequency ranges from 6.5[Hz] to
9.5[Hz]. At the same time, the normal force is limited to
-2.5[kN], which does not affect levitation even with full
capacity.
3.2 Variable slip frequency during the
operation
Fig. 7 illustrates the simulation results. The right side of
the figure shows that when slip frequency varies between
6.5[Hz]~9.5[Hz], the normal force changes under -
2.19[kN]. It means the normal force didn’t reach the criti-
cal value where it could threat the levitation of the train.
Fig. 8 simplifies the comparison of the cumulative power
consumption. When slip frequency varies between
6.5[Hz]~9.5[Hz], power meter counts 4.25[kWh], and
when slip frequency is fixed at 12.5[Hz], it counts
5.34[kWh].
The proposed method saved 1.09[kWh] of energy,
improved 20.41[%] efficiency shows better performance
over conventional method in terms of energy efficient.
4. Conclusion
This paper proposed a new control method to improve
operation efficiency for magnetic levitation train with lin-
ear induction motor. Linear induction motor gets better
efficiency with lower slip frequency. Thus, within a cer-
tain range, changing slip frequency according to notch
command during operation can improve overall effi-
ciency. Simulation result shows that compared to 13.5[Hz]
fixed slip frequency, the proposed control method saved
1.09[kWh] of energy, and improved efficiency by
20.41[%], proves better performance over conventional
method in terms of energy efficient.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by a grant (16RTRP-
B070556-04) from railroad technology research program
funded by Korean ministry of land, infrastructure and
transport of Korean government.
References
1. Hamed Hamzehbahmani. (2011) “Modeling and Simulating
of Single Side Short Stator Linear Induction Motor With The
End Effect”, Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 62, No.
5, 302-308.
2. Jeong-hyoun Sung, Kwanghee Nam. (1999) “A New
Approach to Vector Control for a Linear Induction Motor
Considering End Effects”, Industry Application Confer-
ence,1999. Thirty-Fourth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference
Record of the 1999 IEEE. 2284-2289
3. BOON-TEAK OOI, DAVID C.WHITE.(1970) “Traction
and Normal Forces in the Linear Induction Motor”, IEEE
TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYS-
Fig. 6. Auto Train Operation system (ATO)
Fig. 7. Compare with conventional method and proposed
method
Fig. 8. Auto Train Operation system (ATO)
A Study on Improvement of Operation Efficiency of Magnetic Levitation Train Using Linear Induction Motor
− 45 −
TEMS, VOL. PAS-89, NO.4, APRIL 1970.
4. Gieras J F, Dawson G E, Eastham A R.(1987) “A new lon-
gitudinal end effect factor for linear induction motors”, IEEE
Transaction on Magnetics, EC-2(1),pp.152-159,1987
5. H. Yu, B. Fahimi (2007) “A Direct Control Scheme to
Achieve Maximum Acceleration in Linear Induction
Motors”, Electric Machines & Drives Conference,2007.
IEMDC '07. IEEE international, pp977-982
6. Wei Xu, Guangsheng Sun, Yaohua Li.(2006) “Research on
Tractive Characteristics of the Single Linear Induction
Motor”, Industrial Technology, 2006. ICIT 2006. IEEE Inter-
national Conference on, pp35-38
7. Masao Yano, Michio Iwahori (2003) “Transition from slip-
frequency control to vector control for induction motor
dribes of traction applicaton in japan”, The Fifth Interna-
tional Conference on (Volume:2) 17-20 Nov. 2003, Toyo
University
8. Xiaomin Zhu. (2010) “The Modeling of Test Systems of
Automatic Train Operation (ATO) in Urban Rail Transit
Based on LAB VIEW”, 2010 International Conference on
Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM
2010) (Volume: 1), 22-24 Oct. 2010, Beijing, Jiaotong Uni-
versity