Upload
paulomario-remuzgo
View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Residential Broadband
Group AJohn ChuangTushar Dani
Ilin TsaiIlya Bagrak
Alexandra Fedyukova
Residential Broadband
Introduction Market and competition Technology Economics Policy and regulation Conclusion
What is Residential Broadband Technologies that provide a high-bandwidth
connection to the Internet for residential consumers
Replacement for the now fading residential dial-up technology
Entirely new online experience Watching a video stream, Downloading music in seconds, Video and voice chats Real-time gaming
This presentation is limited to US residential Broadband market
Growth and Penetration
Fast growth, 11% increase per year Reached more than 50% penetration already across internet
households Several competing broadband service providers
Telephone companies, wireless carriers, cable TV service providers and satellite providers
PlayersDSL SBC Verizon Bellsouth Quest
Cable Comcast Time Warner Brothers Cox Charter Cablevision
New technologies: • Wi-Fi (Google cloud in San Francisco, hot spots)• Satellite Signals• Wi-Max• BPL (broadband over power lines)
Market segments & Prices: 1
Competition for Broadband subscribers is bifurcating Low end emphasizing price High end emphasizing speed
DSL companies primarily target low price segment Started penetrating into high end market, Verizon’s FiOS (15
mbps) Cable companies have elected to stay exclusively at
the high end Bundling as a way to reduce churn rate & attract new
customers Triple and even quadruple play
Market segments & Prices: 2
DSL Technology
Limited distance to central office (CO) Dedicated line from CO to home Asymmetric flow Typical speeds up to 1.5Mbits/s downstream
Cable Technology
Shared lines to the nearest splitter Generally higher speeds Reaches more households since distance limitation is
removed Typical offering 4Mbits/s Last Mile advantage
Future Technology WiMax
Metropolitan Area Networks (MANs) 3-5 miles range, no direct line of sight required 2Mbits/s practical limit Can use existing cell towers
Broadband over Power Lines (BPL) More pervasive infrastructure, but requires extra
equipment Up to 2.7Mbits/s Superimposing analog signal over AC Small deployments in operation (e.g. Manassas,
Virginia 10MBits/s for $30.00 a month)
• Broadband as a Commodity. •Some people have 3 to 4 providers to buy from•Tend to buy bundled services• Switching costs are low, unless annual contracts
• Large number of equipment suppliers are availablee.g. Nortel, Lucent, Cisco, Nokia etc.• Limited companies actually own network lines, and heavily depend on network owners
•TV, Music•Newspapers •Telephone etc
• Broadband over power lines• Wi-Fi free internet (Google)• Municipal utility internet• Wi-Max
Cable and DSL Co.•“cut-throat” competition•Trend to provide a bundle of services •Cable companies converging from video to telephony - Cox, Comcast•Telecom companies converging from telephony to video- SBC, Bellsouth, AOL
New entrants
Suppliers Buyers
Substitutes
Source: Michael E. Porter Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, (The Free Press, 1980)
Porter's Five Forces Model
Policy and RegulationExisting situation
US is 16th in the world in broadband penetration (ITU 2005 report)
Why is US so far behind? “monopolistic structure, entrenched management,
and political power of incumbents” failure of effective policy and regulation for
broadband industry (e.g. ,FCC regulation on spectrum allocation policy)
Legislative tug-of-war Preserving Innovation in Telecom Act of 2005 Community Broadband Act of 2005
Policy and Regulation
Need for national broadband strategy Continue to encourage highly successful open
access model in Japan competitors may use existing residential telephone
infrastructure for a modest fee competition and innovation cheap, high-speed
broadband access Regulations for emerging technologies
FCC: better allocation of wireless spectrum Municipal WiFi usage
Mixture of legislative, regulatory, and investment initiatives
Conclusion Market & Players
Broadband will replace dial-up The Battle is still pretty much between Cable and DSL
companies Technology
New technologies such as BPL, Wi-Max, Satellite are emerging, but are not great threat to existing Cable & DSL
Economics Bundling as a way to keep existing and attract new customers Segments based on Price and Speed
Regulation Need for national broadband strategy, open access, economic
incentives
Conclusion Cable companies have advantage due to their
infrastructure and “quadruple play”
They will be top player in coming years
No winner take all conditions, Cable companies, DSL companies, and new technologies will co-exists
Thank you Clap & Questions