Click here to load reader
Upload
edilson-magalhaes-magalhaes
View
56
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
�������� ����� ��
A shrinking particle - shrinking core model for leaching of a zinc ore contain-ing silica
Vida Safari, Gilnaz Arzpeyma, Fereshteh Rashchi, Navid Mostoufi
PII: S0301-7516(09)00142-2DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2009.06.003Reference: MINPRO 2179
To appear in: International Journal of Mineral Processing
Received date: 10 January 2009Revised date: 24 May 2009Accepted date: 11 June 2009
Please cite this article as: Safari, Vida, Arzpeyma, Gilnaz, Rashchi, Fereshteh, Mostoufi,Navid, A shrinking particle - shrinking core model for leaching of a zinc ore containing sil-ica, International Journal of Mineral Processing (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2009.06.003
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofbefore it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production processerrors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers thatapply to the journal pertain.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
A shrinking particle - shrinking core model for leaching of a zinc
ore containing silica
Vida Safari1, Gilnaz Arzpeyma1, Fereshteh Rashchi2, Navid Mostoufi 1,*
1 Department of Chemical Engineering, 2 Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering,
University of Tehran, PO Box 11155/4563, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
A new mathematical model was developed for leaching of zinc ores containing silicates such
as hemimorphite which produce a gel during leaching with sulfuric acid. This model is based
on the shrinking core model in which the particle size and the reacting core shrink
simultaneously. It was shown that the actual dissolution time of the ore particles is longer
than the time corresponding to the dissolution of chemical zinc oxide itself. It was suggested
that because of the existence of silicates in the ore, a gelatinous layer was formed around the
reacting core. Since the gel product is soft, it breaks apart when the particles collide and as a
result, the particles shrink. However, a thin gelatinous layer always covers the reacting core
which increases the mass transfer resistance and increases the leaching time. This model was
applied to leaching of a zinc-rich tailing containing hemimorphite and the thickness of the
gelatinous layer as well as the diffusion coefficient in this layer was determined.
Keywords: Leaching; Kinetics; Zinc silicate; Shrinking core model; gelatinous silica layer
1. Introduction
The main source of zinc metal production is zinc sulfide ore. Currently, depletion of these
sulfide ores has brought more emphasis on zinc extraction from oxides, silicates or even
* Corresponding author, Phone: (98-21)6696-7797; Fax: (98-21) 6640-1024; E-mail address: [email protected]
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2
secondary sources. Zinc extraction is performed mainly by hydrometallurgical methods. In
the hydrometallurgical process, the ore is first leached by a solvent and then before electro-
winning a purification process is used to prepare the solution for eletrolysis.
During the leaching process of zinc oxidized ore, soluble zinc sulfate forms which stays in
solution. In this process, the lead compounds form lead sulfate precipitates which transfer to
the leaching filter cake during the solid/liquid separation. Leaching of the ore at pH ca. 2,
transforms the silicate compounds of the ore to colloidal silica, i.e., a gel (Matthew and
Elsner, 1997).
Process kinetics and optimum operating conditions have been studied for the leaching of zinc
silicate ore tailings. Monhemius and Terry (1983) investigated the influence of different
parameters on the kinetic of acid dissolution of both natural and synthetic willemite
(Zn2SiO4) and hemimorphite (Zn4Si2O7(OH)2.H2O). Specific rate constants were estimated
for leaching of both willemite and hemimorphite in different acidic media. They found that
the dissolution was mixed chemical/diffusion controlled in hemimorphite and chemically
controlled in the case of willemite. Abdel-Aal (2000) investigated the kinetics of sulfuric
acid leaching of low- grade zinc silicate ore. In their study, diffusion through the product
layer was determined as the rate controlling step. Espiari et al. (2006) verified extraction of
zinc from tailings of lead flotation plant. They studied the effect of different parameters on
kinetics of zinc dissolution and found that the rate determining step is the physico-chemical
desorption process. Souza et al. (2007) studied the effect of particle size, temperature and
initial acid concentration on leaching of zinc silicate ores. They concluded that the grain
model with porous diffusion control is the rate controlling step.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3
Some researchers have reported the possible existence of internal diffusion resistance. For
instance, Pecina et al. (2007) have reported formation of a sulfur layer in zinc sulfide
leaching with high concentration of sulfuric acid solution containing hydrogen peroxide and
indicated that this layer reduces leaching efficiency. Mulak et al. (2005) found that in
leaching of spent nickel oxide catalyst with sulfuric acid, an aluminium-rich layer surrounds
the unreacted core of the particle and grows inward as the particle reacts. In leaching process
of sphalerite containing a lower concentration of iron, the decrease in zinc dissolution rate (as
compared to a greater iron-containing sphalerite mineral) was attributed to formation and
growth of a polysulfide surface layer during the initial rapid leach period (Weisener et al.,
2004).
Based on the above evidences, it can be concluded that when a core shrinks, an internal
resistance layer, either a reaction product layer or a gel film forms around the core and results
in a decrease in the extraction yield in the leaching process. However, in many cases, the size
of the particle (including unreacted core and the layer) decreases with time. In other words,
although the product layer forms around the core, it shrinks as the core shrinks. In all the
previous studies, existence of this gelatinous layer around the particle was neglected during
the kinetics calculations and its effect on the kinetics of leaching was not taken into account.
In the present study, a mathematical model has been developed based on the shrinking core
model in which the resistance of the gelatinous product film is also considered. This kinetic
model consists of three steps: external diffusion in the liquid, internal diffusion in the
gelatinous product film and chemical reaction on the surface of the core.
2. Model Development
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4
Zinc silicate ore, as hemimorphite, reacts with sulfuric acid according to the following
reaction:
4 2 7 2 2 2 4 4 2 6 2( ) . 4 4 ( ) 3Zn Si O OH H O H SO ZnSO Si O OH H O+ → + + (1)
Zinc sulfate is soluble in water. However, disilicic acid, Si2O(OH)6, which apparently
polymerizes to produce polysilicic acid, forms a gelatinous phase at specific acidic pH which
remains around the particles surface and leads to a decrease in the extraction yield.
The most common models considered in leaching are illustrated in Fig. 1. Fig. 1a corresponds
to the case when the reaction takes place on the exposed surface of the particle and the
product completely dissolves in the liquid. This shrinking particle model (SPM) has been
used by researchers such as Espiari et al. (2006), Aydoğan et al. (2006) and Velardo et al.
(2002). If the product does not dissolve in the liquid, the particle size would not change but
the reacting core shrinks inside the particle. This situation is shown in Fig. 1b and the model
is called “Shrinking Core-Constant Particle Size”. It has been used by researchers such as
Liu et al. (2006), Liddell (2005) and Szubert et al. (2006). Fig 1c demonstrates schematic of
a model called “Shrinking Core-Shrinking Particle”. In this case as the reaction proceeds, the
unreacted core of particle shrinks while a gelatinous silica layer forms around the core.
However, since this layer is soft, it breaks apart when the particles collide. Nevertheless, a
thin layer of silica remains around the core. The silica layer creates a resistance during acid
transfer from the solution to the surface of the core. In the present work, the last model was
considered as the base kinetic model since the silica product does not dissolve completely in
the acid solution. Therefore, the internal diffusion through the gel film should be taken into
account.
2.1. Assumptions
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
5
The assumptions of the model are as follows:
• The particles are spherical.
• During the process, the particle shrinks uniformly, thus, it maintains its spherical
shape.
• In the absence of adequate information, the thickness of the silica layer around the
core was assumed to be constant during the leaching process.
• Although there exist many reactions in the leaching of zinc by sulfuric acid from the
ore, for the sake of simplicity, the main reaction considered in this work is dissolution
of zinc oxide in acid. In other words, the main source of zinc in the leaching was
assumed to be zinc oxide.
• Hemimorphite particles were considered as the source of silica responsible for the gel
formation.
• Other substances present in the ore do not have any significant effect on the kinetics.
• The temperature remains constant during the process.
• The particle and the gelatinous layer are both non-porous. Thus, mass transfer occurs
through molecular/ion diffusion in these phases.
2.2. Kinetic Modeling
Considering all the above assumptions, the first step for developing the model is to define a
criterion indicative of the advancement of reaction versus time. The rate of reaction per unit
surface of the core can be related to the dissolution rate of zinc oxide as follows:
ZnO ZnOr
c
M dnR
S dt= − (2)
The rate of zinc oxide disappearance can be expressed as:
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
6
ZnO Ore c c
ZnO
dn GS dr
dt M dt
ρ= (3)
It has been shown in several references that the rate of reaction for dissolution of zinc oxide,
Rr, is first order with respect to the concentration of the solvent (e.g., Espiari et al., 2006;
Monhemius and Terry, 1983):
Ar
ZnO
kCR
M= (4)
Therefore, the rate of shrinkage can be expressed as:
c A
Ore
dr kC
dt Gρ= − (5)
The acid concentration, CA, used in Eq. (5) should be evaluated at the surface of the core. To
find the acid concentration at reaction surface, mass balances should be written for both the
liquid film layer and the gelatinous layer. In both cases, mass transfer occurs only in radial
direction and the mass transfer equation becomes:
22
10AdCd
rr dr dr
=
(6)
The boundary conditions are:
( )0
Ac D A A g
dCr r h C C D
drδ= + − = (7)
Ac g A
dCr r D kC
dr= = (8)
Considering that the process is in quasi-steady-state conditions, the rate of reaction at the
surface of the core would be equal to the rate of mass transfer to and through the gel film:
( )0c c
D A A Ar rh C C k Cδ+
− = (9)
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
7
Solving the differential Eq. (6) with boundary conditions (7) and (8) and then solving Eq. (9)
for finding CA(rc) would result in obtaining CA:
0
2
2 2
1 1
1 1( )
g
c cA A
g g
c c c D c
D
kr r rC C
D D
kr r r h rδ δ
− −
= + − + + +
(10)
Therefore, the dissolution rate of zinc oxide can be expressed as:
0
2
2
1
11
( )
cA r r A
rZnO ZnO c c c
g c D c
k C CR
M M r r r
k D r h rδ δ
=
= =
+ − + + +
(11)
or in form of the shrinkage rate:
0
2
2
1
11
( )
Ac
Ore c c c
g c D c
Cdr
dt G r r r
k D r h r
ρδ δ
= −
+ − + + +
(12)
Eq. (12) can be expressed in terms of advancement of the reaction. The conversion can be
determined based on the residual volume of particle as follows:
3
0
( )( ) 1 cr t
X tr
= −
(13)
Therefore, the final differential equation, from which the extent of dissolution of particles as
a function of time can be obtained, can be then achieved by combining Eqs. (12) and (13):
( )( )
32/3 2 2/3 20
0 021/3 1/3 1/3
0 0 0
3 1
1 (1 )1 1 1(1 ) (1 ) (1 )
A
Ore
g D
CdX
dt Gr X r X r
k D r X r X h r X
ρ
δ δ
= − − + − + − − + − +
(14)
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
8
2.3. Chemical and Physical Properties
The only chemical reaction considered in this work on the surface of the core is dissolution of
zinc oxide by sulfuric acid. Reaction rate constant for dissolution of pure zinc oxide in
sulfuric acid is calculated from the following equation (Kristovnikov and Davydovskaya,
1936):
4 13634.966.028 10 expk
RT− = × −
(m/s) (15)
It is worth mentioning that in all previous investigations on kinetics of leaching of zinc with
sulfuric acid, different rate constants were reported (e.g., Espiari et al., 2006; Abdel-Aal.,
2000). However, since in all these investigations the effect of gelatinous layer was not taken
into account, the reported rate constant is in fact a combination of reaction rate constant and
dispersion coefficient of acid in the gelatinous layer. In the present study, the effect of
gelatinous layer is separated from the reaction. Therefore, only dissolution of pure zinc oxide
in sulfuric acid was considered on the surface of the ore. Of course, based on the
assumptions listed above, effect of other substances in the ore, on the dissolution kinetic of
zinc oxide was neglected in this work.
The mass transfer coefficient was calculated from (Ranz and Marshall, 1952):
1/21/3
1/3 1/22 0.6 Re 2 0.6 p pd uSh Sc
D
µρ µ
= + = +
(16)
Evaluation of mass transfer coefficient from Eq. (16) requires estimation of viscosity, density
and diffusion coefficient of the acid solution. These properties are not simple functions of
their compositions. There can be found several equations for viscosity, density and diffusion
coefficient of the mixture in this process in various literatures. In the present study, the
following correlations of Guerra et al. (2006) were used:
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
9
[ ] [ ]3 5 2 8 3
11 44 2 4
(0.4332344 4.998831 10 2.174276 10 4.216447 10
3.072309 10 ) exp(0.6182 0.1801
T T T
T ZnSO H SO
µ − − −
−
= − × + × − ×+ × × +
(17)
[ ] 2 22 4
3
1153.82 66748 181.436 158.354[ ]
396.312[ ] 0.55
H SO Zn Fe
Fe T
ρ + +
+
= + + +
+ − (18)
[ ] [ ]( ) [ ][ ] [ ] [ ]( )
4
0.5
4 2 4 4
1.5 102 4 4 2 4
[8.083 7.496 0.296 4.105
3.924 0.739 1.615 ] 10
ZnSOD ZnSO H SO ZnSO
H SO ZnSO H SO −
= − + +
+ − + × (19)
3. Results and discussion
Performance of the proposed model was examined using the experimental data reported by
Espiari et al. (2006) for leaching of zinc from a zinc-rich oxide silicate tailing with sulfuric
acid. Their XRF analysis results showed that the sample contained 37% zinc oxide and
23.7% silica. The leaching data reported by Espiari et al. (2006) are available as zinc
recovery vs. time at various temperatures. Eq. (14) was solved for different operating
conditions reported by Espiari et al. (2006). In this equation, thickness and diffusion
coefficient of the gel layer were considered as fitting parameters and their values at different
temperatures were determined by fitting the equation to the experimental data.
Fig. 2 illustrates a sample solution of the model as well as the corresponding experimental
data. This figure shows the conversion of the ore as a function of time in the batch system. It
can be seen in Fig. 2 that the model fits satisfactorily to the experimental data (Espiari et al.,
2006). Prediction of the conversion when the effect of the gel film was neglected (only zinc
oxide reaction with acid and liquid film resistance was considered) is also shown in the same
figure. As it can be seen, the particles dissolved very fast if the effect of gel film formation is
neglected. However, the trend of the experimental data suggests that the leaching process is
not as fast as dissolution of zinc oxide in sulfuric acid. Slower reaction can be justified by
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10
adding the resistance of the gel film which is modeled in the present study. Therefore, it is
not possible to neglect the effect of the gel film because its effect on the leaching is
substantial.
Espiari et al. (2006) reported conversion vs. time at various temperatures. Using these
experimental data it was found that the thickness of the layer is almost constant in the range
of temperature considered in this work and its average was determined to be 1.2 µm with
standard deviation of 0.8 µm. However, diffusion coefficient is a strong function of
temperature. The Arrhenius plot of diffusion coefficient of the gel against temperature is
shown in Fig. 3 from which temperature dependency of diffusion coefficient was found to be:
28167.83ln 12.92gD
RT= − − (20)
There are three terms in the denominator of Eq. (14) which correspond to resistances due to
chemical reaction, diffusion through gel film and mass transfer in the liquid film,
respectively. Resistance of the liquid film is negligible as compared to the other two
resistances for the operating conditions considered in this work. Therefore, in order to
investigate the effect of temperature on the leaching rate, only chemical reaction and
diffusion through the gel were considered. Fig. 4 demonstrates the reaction and internal
diffusion resistances as a function of temperature. It can be seen in this figure that both of the
resistances decrease by increasing the temperature. At low temperatures, reaction resistance
is negligible and kinetic mechanism would be reduced to gel diffusion control. Increasing the
temperature has a significant effect on both reaction and mass transfer rates. At high
temperatures these two rates are of the same order of magnitude as shown in figure 4.
Therefore, at high temperature, the process is controlled by both chemical reaction and
diffusion though the gelatinous layer.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
11
4. Conclusion
A mathematical model was developed for leaching of zinc from a zinc ore containing silica.
It was shown that considering only the chemical reaction of zinc dissolution is not sufficient
for estimating the leaching time of the ore. A thin gelatinous layer was considered to cover
the reacting core of the ore in order to correct the model prediction. Adding the mass transfer
resistance of this layer to the model considerably improved the predictions. It was shown that
the thickness of the gel is almost constant but the diffusion coefficient of the gel decreases
with temperature. At low temperatures, the reaction rate is significantly lower than the rate
of mass transfer through this layer which alters the mechanism to diffusion controlled. At
high temperatures, both chemical reaction and mass transfer control the dissolution rate of the
zinc ore particles containing silica.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Professor Fathi Habashi from University of Laval, Canada,
for his valuable comments during the work.
Nomenclature
CA acid concentration at the surface of the core (kg.m-3)
CA0 acid concentration in the bulk (kg.m-3)
dp particle diameter (m)
Dg diffusivity of gel (m2.s-1)
DZnSO4 diffusion coefficient of zinc sulfate in solution (m2.s-1)
G zinc oxide grade
hD mass transfer coefficient (m.s-1)
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
12
k reaction rate constant (m.s-1)
MZnO zinc oxide molecular weight (kg.kmol-1)
nZnO moles of zinc oxide (kmol)
rc core radius (m)
r0 initial radius of the particle (m)
R gas constant (8.314 J.mol-1.K-1)
Rr rate of reaction for dissolution of zinc oxide (kg.m-2.s-1)
Re Reynolds number; Re=ρupdp/µ
Sc surface of the core (m2)
Sc Schmidt number; Sc=µ/ρDZnSO4
Sh Sherwood number; Sh=hDdp/µ
t time (sec.)
T temperature (K)
up terminal velocity (m.s-1)
X volumetric conversion
Greek letters
δ gelatinous layer thickness (m)
µ viscosity of solution (kg.m-1.s-1)
ρOre density of zinc ore (kg.m-3)
ρ density of solution (kg.m-3)
References
Abdel-Aal, E. A., 2000. Kinetics of sulfuric acid leaching of low-grade zinc silicate ore.
Hydrometallurgy 55, 247-254.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
Aydoğan, S., Erdemoğlu, M., Aras, A., Uçar, G., Özkan, A., 2006. Dissolution kinetics of
celestite (SrSO4) in HCl solution with BaCl2, Hydrometallurgy 84, 239–246
Espiari, S., Rashchi, F., Sadrnezhaad, S. K., 2006. Hydrometallurgical treatment of tailings
with high zinc content. Hydrometallurgy 82, 54-62.
Guerra, E., Bestetti, M., 2006. Physicochemical properties of ZnSO4-H2SO4-H2O electrolytes
of relevance to zinc electrowinning, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51, 1491-1497.
Kristovnikov, A. H., Davydovskaya, E. A., 1936. Zh. Fiz. Khim (In Russian). 8, 77-84.
Liddell, K. C., 2005. Shrinking core models in hydrometallurgy: What students are not being
told about the pseudo-steady approximation, Hydrometallurgy 79, 62–68.
Liu, Y., Qi, T., Chu, J., Tong, Q., Zhang, Y., 2006. Decomposition of ilmenite by
concentrated KOH solution under atmospheric pressure, Int. J. Miner. Process. 81, 79–84.
Matthew, G., Elsner, D., 1977. Hydrometallurgical treatment of zinc silicate ores,
Metallurgical Transactions 8B, 73-83.
Monhemius, A. J., Terry., 1983. Acid dissolution of willemite and hemimorphite,
Metallurgical Transactions 14B, 335-346.
Mulak, W., Miazga, B., Szymczycha, A., 2005. Kinetics of nickel leaching from spent
catalyst in sulphuric acid solution, Int. J. Miner Process 77, 231-235.
Pecina, T., Franco, T., Castillo, P., Orrantia, E., 2007. Leaching of zinc concentrate in H2SO4
solutions containing H2O2 and complexing agents, Minerals Eng. 21(1), 23-30.
Ranz, W. E., Marshall, W. R. 1952, Evaporation from drops: part 1, Chem. Eng. Prog. 48,
141-150.
Souza, A. D., Peina, P. S., Lima, E. V. O., daSilva, C. A., Leão, V. A., 2007. Kinetics of
sulphuric acid leaching of a zinc silicate calcine, Hydrometallurgy 89, 337-345.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
14
Szubert, A., Łupiński, M., Sadowski, Z., 2006. Application of shrinking core model to
bioleaching of black shale particles, Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing,
40, 211-225.
Velardo, A., Giona, M., Adrover, A., Pagnanelli, F., Toro, L., 2002. Two-layer shrinking-
core model: parameter estimation for the reaction order in leaching processes, Chem.
Eng. J. 90, 231–240.
Weisener, C. G., Smart, R. St. C., Gerson, A. R., 2004. A comparison of the kinetics and
mechanism of acid leaching of sphalerite containing low and high concentrations of iron,
Int. J. Miner. Process 74, 239-249.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
15
Figure Captions
Figure 1. Schematics of different mechanisms of leaching
Figure 2. Model verification with and without gelatinous layer
Figure 3. Gel diffusivity versus temperature
Figure 4. Comparing reaction and gel diffusion resistances.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
16
Leaching Time
(c) Shrinking Core – Shrinking Particle
(b) Shrinking Core – Constant Particle Size
(a) Shrinking Particle
Figure 1. Schematics of different mechanisms of leaching
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
17
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0 50 100 150
time (min)
X
Espiari et al. (2006)
Present model
Neglecting gel
Figure 2. Model verification with and without gelatinous layer
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18
-25
-24
-23
0.0029 0.003 0.0031 0.0032 0.0033 0.0034 0.0035
1/T (K-1)
ln D
g
Figure 3. Gel diffusivity versus temperature
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
19
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
270 290 310 330 350 370
Temperature (K)
Res
ista
nce
(min
./m)
Diffusion
Reaction
Figure 4. Comparing reaction and gel diffusion resistances.