4
A short note on the terminal nerve in Callorhinchus milii (Callorhinchidae, Holocephali, Chondrichthyes) by Martin LICHT (1) & Peter BARTSCH* (2) Cybium 2015, 39(4): 317-320. (1) Tannenweg 6, D-32105 Bad Salzuflen, Germany. (2) Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Invalidenstr. 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany. * Corresponding author [[email protected]] Ichthyological note – Note ichtyologique © SFI Received: 1st Sep. 2015 Accepted: 29 Sep. 2015 Editor: R. Causse Résumé. – À propos du nerf terminal de Callorhinchus milii (Cal- lorhinchidae, Holocephali, Chondrichthyes) Le nerf terminal a été décrit récemment en détail chez les holocéphales. Cependant, cette étude portait uniquement sur deux espèces (Hydrolagus colliei et Chimaera monstrosa) de Chimeri- dae, la famille la plus dérivée parmi les holocéphales actuels. Nous complétons ici le précédent travail en décrivant, pour la première fois, le nerf terminal chez la chimère éléphant (Callorhinchus milii) dans son dernier stade ontogénétique, à partir de coupes sériées d’un spécimen. Le trajet du nerf terminal de C. milii ressemble à celui des autres holocéphales. Nous proposons que la position plu- tôt ventrale et médiane soit la condition de base pour les holocépha- les actuels et peut-être pour les gnathostomes. Keywords. – Chimaeriformes – Callorhinchidae - Callorhinchus milii - Neuroanatomy - Olfactory epithelium - Nervus terminalis. Extant holocephalan fish are an ancient group among recent gnathostomes and are considered sister-group to Elasmobranchii (sharks, batoids, and rays) (e.g. Zangerl, 1981; Maisey, 1986). Thanks to their exceptional morphology, a unique combination of primitive gnathostome and spectacular derived characters, they have been studied for a long time and much work has concentrated on their cranium (e.g. Cole, 1896; Dean, 1906; Allis, 1917; Keste- ven, 1933; De Beer and Moy-Thomas, 1935; Stahl, 1967; Didier, 1995). Information of morphology and biology comes mainly from two species, Hydrolagus colliei (Lay & Bennett, 1839) and Cal- lorhinchus milii Bory de St. Vincent, 1823. Particular interest on the morphology and genetics of C. milii arose during the last years, which is not only because this species is more easily accessible but also because C. milii belongs to Callorhinchidae, the basal sister family of the other two extant families Chimaeridae and Rhinochi- maeridae (e.g. Didier, 1995; Licht et al., 2012; Pradel et al. 2013; Jerve et al., 2014; Ryll et al., 2014; Venkatesh et al., 2014). Some investigations have been performed on the cranial nerves of holocephalans (e.g. Cole, 1896; Liu, 2001) and the cranial nerves of holocephalan fish still conceal unknown information about gna- thostome evolution (Pradel et al. 2013). Though the cranial nerves have been often examined under different aspects, the nervus ter- minalis was described for holocephalans only recently, in 2012 by Licht and Bartsch, thereby correcting a doubtful statement that this nerve is not present in Holocephali (Liu, 2001). But the ter- minal nerve has never been described for Callorhinchus and even Schauinsland (1903) missed it in his otherwise very informative 3-D reconstruction of the head and brain of C. milii. That this nerve should not be present in all holocephalan fami- lies was particularly surprising, considering that it is present and to some extent prominent in the Elasmobranchii (e.g. Locy, 1899, 1905; Norris and Hughes, 1920; Demski et al., 1987). Neverthe- less, Licht and Bartsch (2012) had only access to two species (Hydrolagus colliei and Chimaera monstrosa Linnaeus, 1758), which just represent the most derived family (Chimaeridae) of extant holocephalans and were not able to demonstrate the pres- ence of the terminal nerve in Callorhinchidae. However, it would be particularly interesting if the pattern of the nervus terminalis in Callorhinchidae, was similar to that in Chimaeridae (i.e. an entirely ventro-mesial position relative to the bulbus and tractus olfacto- rius and elongate forebrain hemispheres), or showed a more dorsal course as in elasmobranchs (e.g. Locy, 1899, 1905). Here, we now supplement our study and demonstrate a ganglionated terminal nerve, well-separated from the fibre bundles of the olfactory nerve and tract in the holocephalan Callorhinchus milii. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study is based on a series of histological transverse sec- tions of a pre-hatchling of Callorhinchus milii (NMNZ No. 1670), stored at the Museum für Naturkunde (Berlin). The specimen was caught in April 1955 in Day’s Bay (Wellington, New Zealand): total length = 72 mm; head length = 19 mm. The head was embedded in Paraffin, and serially cut into 10 µm-thick sections, stained in Heidenhain’s AZAN, examined in a Leica DME microscope, and photographed with a Zeiss AxioCam MRc 5. RESULTS Though histological preservation of the specimen is far from ideal, it was easy to follow the course of the terminal nerve along the telencephalic hemispheres. The nervus terminalis has its anteri- or origin at the olfactory epithelium and nasal capsule in the region of the anteriormost fibres of the nervus olfactorius. The following Note: Martin Licht, the first author of this study, friend, colleague and a gifted and enthusiastic younger researcher in ichthyology and paleontology, passed away on Friday, September 11, 2015 all of a sudden. Sadly, he did neither see this study published, nor the prints of his recent work on Tetragonurus. Our thoughts are with him, and his family he leaves behind.

A short note on the terminal nerve in Callorhinchus milii …sfi-cybium.fr/sites/default/files/pdfs-cybium/10-Licht... · 2016. 3. 17. · In elasmobranch fish, the terminal nerve

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • A short note on the terminal nerve in Callorhinchus milii (Callorhinchidae, Holocephali, Chondrichthyes)

    by

    Martin Licht† (1) & Peter Bartsch* (2)

    Cybium 2015, 39(4): 317-320.

    (1) Tannenweg6,D-32105BadSalzuflen,Germany.(2)MuseumfürNaturkundeBerlin,Invalidenstr.43,D-10115Berlin,Germany.* Correspondingauthor[[email protected]]

    Ichthyological note – Note ichtyologique©

    SFI

    Received: 1st Sep. 2015Accepted: 29 Sep. 2015Editor: R. Causse

    Résumé.–ÀproposdunerfterminaldeCallorhinchus milii (cal-lorhinchidae,Holocephali,Chondrichthyes)

    Lenerfterminalaétédécritrécemmentendétailchezlesholocéphales.Cependant,cetteétudeportaituniquementsurdeuxespèces(Hydrolagus colliei et Chimaera monstrosa)deChimeri-dae,lafamillelaplusdérivéeparmilesholocéphalesactuels.Nouscomplétonsicileprécédenttravailendécrivant,pourlapremièrefois,lenerfterminalchezlachimèreéléphant(Callorhinchus milii) danssondernierstadeontogénétique,àpartirdecoupessériéesd’unspécimen.LetrajetdunerfterminaldeC. miliiressembleàceluidesautresholocéphales.Nousproposonsquelapositionplu-tôtventraleetmédianesoitlaconditiondebasepourlesholocépha-lesactuelsetpeut-êtrepourlesgnathostomes.

    Keywords.–Chimaeriformes–Callorhinchidae-Callorhinchus milii-Neuroanatomy-Olfactoryepithelium-Nervus terminalis.

    Extantholocephalanfishareanancientgroupamongrecentgnathostomesandareconsideredsister-grouptoElasmobranchii(sharks,batoids,andrays)(e.g.Zangerl,1981;Maisey,1986).Thankstotheirexceptionalmorphology,auniquecombinationofprimitivegnathostomeandspectacularderivedcharacters,theyhavebeenstudiedforalongtimeandmuchworkhasconcentratedontheircranium(e.g.Cole,1896;Dean,1906;Allis,1917;Keste-ven,1933;DeBeerandMoy-Thomas,1935;Stahl,1967;Didier,1995).Informationofmorphologyandbiologycomesmainlyfromtwospecies,Hydrolagus colliei(Lay&Bennett,1839)andCal-lorhinchus miliiBorydeSt.Vincent,1823.ParticularinterestonthemorphologyandgeneticsofC. milii arose during the last years, whichisnotonlybecausethisspeciesismoreeasilyaccessiblebutalsobecauseC. milii belongstoCallorhinchidae,thebasalsisterfamilyoftheothertwoextantfamiliesChimaeridaeandRhinochi-maeridae(e.g.Didier,1995;Licht et al.,2012;Pradelet al.2013;Jerveet al.,2014;Ryllet al.,2014;Venkateshet al.,2014).

    Someinvestigationshavebeenperformedonthecranialnervesofholocephalans(e.g.Cole,1896;Liu,2001)andthecranialnervesofholocephalanfishstillconcealunknowninformationaboutgna-thostomeevolution(Pradelet al.2013).Thoughthecranialnerveshavebeenoftenexaminedunderdifferentaspects,thenervus ter-minaliswasdescribedforholocephalansonlyrecently,in2012byLichtandBartsch,therebycorrectingadoubtfulstatementthat

    thisnerveisnotpresentinHolocephali(Liu,2001).Buttheter-minalnervehasneverbeendescribedforCallorhinchusandevenSchauinsland(1903)misseditinhisotherwiseveryinformative3-DreconstructionoftheheadandbrainofC. milii.

    Thatthisnerveshouldnotbepresentinallholocephalanfami-lieswasparticularlysurprising,consideringthatitispresentandtosomeextentprominentintheElasmobranchii(e.g.Locy,1899,1905;NorrisandHughes,1920;Demskiet al.,1987).Neverthe-less,LichtandBartsch(2012)hadonlyaccesstotwospecies(Hydrolagus colliei and Chimaera monstrosaLinnaeus,1758),whichjustrepresentthemostderivedfamily(Chimaeridae)ofextantholocephalansandwerenotabletodemonstratethepres-enceoftheterminalnerveinCallorhinchidae.However,itwouldbeparticularlyinterestingifthepatternofthenervus terminalis in Callorhinchidae,wassimilartothatinChimaeridae(i.e.anentirelyventro-mesialpositionrelativetothebulbus and tractus olfacto-riusandelongateforebrainhemispheres),orshowedamoredorsalcourseasinelasmobranchs(e.g.Locy,1899,1905).Here,wenowsupplementourstudyanddemonstrateaganglionatedterminalnerve,well-separatedfromthefibrebundlesoftheolfactorynerveandtractintheholocephalanCallorhinchus milii.

    MAteRiAl And MetHods

    Thisstudyisbasedonaseriesofhistologicaltransversesec-tionsofapre-hatchlingofCallorhinchus milii(NMNZNo.1670),storedattheMuseumfürNaturkunde(Berlin).ThespecimenwascaughtinApril1955inDay’sBay(Wellington,NewZealand):totallength=72mm;headlength=19mm.TheheadwasembeddedinParaffin,andseriallycutinto10µm-thicksections,stainedinHeidenhain’sAZAN,examinedinaLeicaDMEmicroscope,andphotographedwithaZeissAxioCamMRc5.

    Results

    Thoughhistologicalpreservationofthespecimenisfarfromideal,itwaseasytofollowthecourseoftheterminalnervealongthetelencephalichemispheres.Thenervus terminalis has its anteri-ororiginattheolfactoryepitheliumandnasalcapsuleintheregionoftheanteriormostfibresofthenervus olfactorius.Thefollowing

    † Note:MartinLicht,thefirstauthorofthisstudy,friend,colleagueandagiftedandenthusiasticyoungerresearcherinichthyologyandpaleontology,passedawayonFriday,September11,2015allofasudden.Sadly,hedidneitherseethisstudypublished,northeprintsofhisrecentworkonTetragonurus.Ourthoughtsarewithhim,andhisfamilyheleavesbehind.

  • Nervusterminalis in Callorhinchusmilii Licht & Bartsch

    318 Cybium 2015, 39(4)

    Figure1.-Histologicaltransversesectionsthroughnasalsacandforebrainofapre-hatchlingofCallorhinchus milii (NMNZNo1670),respectively.A:Anteriorganglionofthenervus terminalis,closetotheolfactoryepitheliumandnasalcapsuleintheregionofthefibresofthenervus olfactorius.B:Largermagnificationofsquaredregioninfigure1A.C:Relativepositionoftheterminalnerveclosetothenasalseptumonitscourseposterioralongthebulbus and tractus olfactorius.d:Largermagnificationofsquaredregioninfigure1C.e:Posteriorganglionofthenervus terminalisatthemedioventralpartofthetelencephaloninC. milii. F:Largermagnificationofsquaredregioninfigure1E.Abbreviations:(BO)bulbus olfactorius,(BV)bloodvessel,(GNTa)anteriorganglionofn. terminalis,(GNTp)posteriorganglionofn. terminalis,(NO)n. olfactorius,(NT)n. terminalis,(OE)olfactoryepithelium,(T)telencephalon,(TH)telencephalichemisphere.

  • Licht & Bartsch Nervusterminalis in Callorhinchusmilii

    Cybium 2015, 39(4) 319

    courseoftheterminalnerveinC. miliiisalsoconsistentwiththecourseinChimaera and Hydrolagus.LichtandBartsch(2012)describedthecourseasfollows:itsanteriorganglionliesontheinnerventralsideofthefirstcranialnerveclosetothenasalseptumandsendsafferentbranchestothenervus olfactoriusand/orclosetotheolfactoryepithelium(Fig.1A,B).Therelativepositionofthenervedoesnotchange,followingitscoursealongtheolfactorynerveposteriorlytowardsthebulbus and tractus olfactorius(Fig.1C,D).Asecondganglionissituatedatthemedioventralpartofthetelencephalichemisphere(Fig.1E,F).Finally,thenervus termi-nalisentersthetelencephalonmediodorsally(Fig.1E).Duringitscourse,theterminalnerveiscloselyassociatedwithbloodvessels,inparticularadistinctanteriorbranchoftheinnercarotidartery(Fig.1D,F).

    disCussion

    Itisgenerallyknownthattheterminalnerveispresentinmost,ifnotall,vertebrates(e.g.DemskiandSchwanzel-Fukuda,1987)andalsoinholocephalanfish(LichtandBartsch,2012).ButithasnotbeendetectedinthemostbasalextantfamilyCallorhinchidae.LichtandBartsch(2012)statedthequestionthatitwouldbeinter-estingwhetherthecourseoftheterminalnerveintheCallorhinchi-daeresemblesmorethoseoftherelatedelasmobranchs,orifitislikeinthemorederivedextantholocephalansH. colliei and C. monstrosa.Inelasmobranchfish,theterminalnerverestsontherostrodorsalsurfaceoftheolfactorybulbandrunsdorsalormedialto the bulbus olfactorius and tractus olfactorius(e.g.Locy,1905;Demski,1987),whileinC. miliitheterminalnervehasitsentirecourseventralandmedialtothebulbus and tractus olfactorius as in otherholocephalans(e.g.LichtandBartsch,2012)(Fig.2).Becauseofthesamepatternofthenervus terminalisinbothextantholo-cephalanfamilies,weconcludethatthismoreventralandmediancourseisbasicforextantHolocephali.However,theterminalnerveisstillundescribedforRhinochimaeridae,andalsoforfossilholo-cephalanswithadifferentcranialanatomy.Possibly,thecourseoftheterminalnervecoincideswiththespecialcranialmorphologyandfarventralpositionofnasalsacandcapsule,andtheelasmo-branchconditionisthemorebasalonealsofortheholocephalanclade.InDipnoiadultsandlarvae,asshowninPinkus(1895)andBartsch(1993),thecourseismoresimilartothatinelasmobranchfish.Butweassumethattheventralandmedianposition,aswellasthecoursetotheolfactorytractandbulb,isaplesiomorphicchar-

    acterforgnathostomes,asalsoshowninActinopterygians(Allis,1897:plateXXXVIII,fig.64;Brookover,1910)orinextinctpla-coderms(e.g.Long,1988:fig.12;Dupretet al.,2014:Extendeddatafigs3e,f).Notsurprisingly,thisdelicatenerveisonlyknowninafewofthosefossiltaxainwhichanossifiedandwell-preservedendoskeletonoftheneurocraniumexactlymouldsnervebranches,vesselsandnasalcapsules.Nevertheless,thepotentialphyloge-neticanddevelopmentalimplicationsofitspresenceandcourseinholocephalansareyettobedetermined.But,ourfindingsfurtherconfirmitsgeneralpresenceinHolocephaliandthatthepatternofthenervus terminalisinextantHolocephalidiffersfromthatoftheirnextextantrelatives,theElasmobranchii.Certainly,thereissomecorrelationwiththetypeofdevelopmentandinvaginationofthetelencephalichemispheresinthesegroups.Theresultsforholocephalanfishmaythustriggernewquestionsandinterestinthecomparativeanatomicalstudyofthisstructure,itsdevelopmentandsignificanceinvertebrateevolution.

    Acknowledgments.–WesincerelythanktheNationalMuseumofNewZealand(NMNZ,nowMuseumofNewZealandTePapaTongarewa),Wellington,theformer“DominionMuseumWellington”andHansBjer-ring(Stockholm),forthedonationandloanofholocephalanindividuals,respectively.Forlaboratoryhelpwiththehistologicaltransversesections,wethankJuttaZeller(Berlin)andPeterGiere(Berlin)foraccesstothemicroscopeequipmentandcamera. WearegreatlyindebtedtoIljaKogan(Freiberg)forthetranslationsandhelpwiththeFrenchlanguage.

    ReFeRenCes

    ALLISE.P.,1897.-ThecranialmusclesandcranialandfirstspinalnervesinAmia calva.J. Morphol.,12:487-770.

    ALLISE.P.,Jr.,1917.-Theprechordalportionofthechondrocra-niumofChimaera colliei.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond.,1917:105-143.

    BARTSCHP.,1993.-DevelopmentofthesnoutoftheAustralianlungfishNeoceratodus forsteri(Krefft,1870),withspecialref-erencetocranialnerves.Acta Zool.-Stockholm,74:15-29.

    BROOKOVERC.,1910.-Theolfactorynerve,thenervus termi-nalisandthepre-opticsympatheticsysteminAmia calva,L.J. Comp. Neurol.,20(2):49-118.

    COLEF.J.,1896.-OnthecranialnervesofChimaera monstrosa (Linn.1754);withadiscussionofthelaterallinesystem,andofthemorphologyoftheChordatympani.Trans. R. Soc. Edinb.,38:631-680.

    Figure2.-Sketchoftheforebrainandcourseoftheterminalnerveofthepre-hatchlingofCallorhinchus miliiinsagittalsectionshow-ingthelefthemisphere.Abbreviations:(BO)bulbus olfactorius,(CA)anteriorcom-missure,(Ep)epiphysis,(FV)ventricularforamen,(NT)nervus terminalis, (tc) tela choroidea(ofthemedianforebrainventri-cle),(TrO)tractus opticus.

  • Nervusterminalis in Callorhinchusmilii Licht & Bartsch

    320 Cybium 2015, 39(4)

    DEBEERG.R.&MOY-THOMASJ.A.,1935.-OntheskullofHolocephali.Phil. Trans. B,224:287-312.

    DEANB.,1906.-ChimaeroidFishesandtheirDevelopment.194p.CarnegieInstitutionofWashingtonPublication,32.

    DEMSKIL.S.,1987.-Phylogenyofluteinizinghormone-releasingsystemsinprotochordatesandvertebrates.In:TheTerminalNerve(Nervus terminalis)Structure,Function,andEvolution(DemskiL.S.&Schwanzel-FukudaM.,eds.),pp.1-14.AnnalsNewYorkAcademyofScience,519.

    DEMSKIL.S.&SCHWANZEL-FUKUDAM.,1987.-Introduc-tion.In:TheTerminalNerve(Nervus terminalis)Structure,Function,andEvolution(DemskiL.S.&Schwanzel-FukudaM.,eds.),pp.ix-xi.AnnalsNewYorkAcademyofScience,519.

    DEMSKIL.S.,FIELDSR.D.,BULLOCKT.H.,SCHREIBMANM.P.&MARGOLIS-NUNNOH.,1987.-Theterminalnerveofsharksandrays.Electronmicroscopic,immunocytochemi-cal,andelectrophysiologicalstudies.In:TheTerminalNerve(Nervus terminalis)Structure,Function,andEvolution(Dem-skiL.S.&Schwanzel-FukudaM.,eds.),pp.15-32.AnnalsNewYorkAcademyofScience,519.

    DIDIERD.A.,1995.-Phylogeneticsystematicsofextantchimae-roidfishes(Holocephali,Chimaeroidei).Am. Mus. Novitates, 3119:1-86.

    DUPRETV.,SANCHEZS.,GOUJETD.,TAFFOREAUP.&AHLBERGP.E.,2014.-Aprimitiveplacodermshedslightontheoriginofthejawedvertebrateface.Nature,507:500-503.

    JERVEA.,JOHANSONZ.,AHLBERGP.&BOISVERTC.,2014.-EmbryonicdevelopmentoffinspinesinCallorhinchus milii (Holocephali);implicationsforchondrichthyanfinspineevolu-tion.Evol. Dev.,16(6):339-53.

    KESTEVENH.L.,1933.-TheanatomyoftheheadofCallorhyn-chus antarticus.J. Anat.,67:449-454.

    LICHTM.&BARTSCHP.,2012.-Noteontheterminalnerveinchimaeroidfishes(Holocephali;Chimaeridae).Cybium,36(4):539-543.

    LICHTM.,SCHMUECKERK.,HUELSKENT.,HANELR.,BARTSCHP.&PAECKERTM.,2012.-Contributiontothemolecularphylogeneticanalysisofextantholocephalanfishes(Holocephali,Chimaeriformes).Org. Divers. Evol.,12(4):421-432.

    LIUZ.,2001.-Phylogeneticrelationshipsofthelivingchimaeroidfishesbasedoncharactersofthebrainandcranialnerves.New Mex. J. Sci.,41:1-24.

    LOCYW.A.,1899.-Newfactsregardingthedevelopmentoftheolfactorynerve.Anat. Anz.,16(12):273-290.

    LOCYW.A.,1905.-Onanewlyrecognizednerveconnectedwiththeforebrainofse1achians.Anat. Anz.,26:33-63,111-123.

    LONGJ.,1988.-Anewcamuropiscidarthrodire(Pisces:Placod-ermi)fromGogo,WesternAustralia.Zool. J. Linn. Soc.,94:233-258.

    MAISEYJ.G.,1986.-Headsandtails:acordatephylogeny.Cla-distics,2:201-256.

    NORRISH.W.&HUGHESS.P.,1920.-Thecranial,occipitalandanteriorspinalnervesofthedogfish,Squalus acanthias.J. Comp. Neurol.,31:293-402.

    PINKUSF.,1895.-DieHirnnervendesProtopterus annectens.Morphol. Arbeit.,4:275-346.

    PRADELA.,DIDIERD.,CASANED.,TAFFOREAUP.&MAI-SEYJ.G.,2013.-Holocephalanembryoprovidesnewinfor-mationontheevolutionoftheglossopharyngealnerve,metoticfissureandparachordalplateinGnathostomes.PLoS ONE, 8(6):e66988.

    RYLLB.,SANCHEZS.,HAITINAT.,TAFFOREAUP.&AHL-BERGP.E.,2014.-ThegenomeofCallorhinchusandthefos-silrecord:anewperspectiveonSCPPgeneevolutioningnath-ostomes.Evol. Dev.,16:123-124.

    SCHAUINSLANDH.H.,1903.-BeiträgezurEntwicklungsges-chichteundAnatomiederWirbelthiere,I.Sphenodon, Callo-rhynchus, Chamaeleo.Zoologica,39:1-98.

    STAHLB.J.,1967.-MorphologyandrelationshipsoftheHolo-cephaliwithspecialreferencetothevenoussystem.Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.,135:141-213.

    VENKATESHB.,LEEA.P.,RAVIV.et al.[33authors],2014.-Elephantsharkgenomeprovidesuniqueinsightsintognathos-tomeevolution.Nature,505:174-179.

    ZANGERLR.,1981.-HandbookofPaleoichthyology,vol.3AChondrichthyesI.PalaeozoicElasmobranchii.113p.München:VerlagDr.FriedrichPfeil.