UIC Law Review UIC Law Review

Volume 9 Issue 1 Article 11

Fall 1975

A Selective Bibliography of Drug Related Literature, 9 J. Marshall A Selective Bibliography of Drug Related Literature, 9 J. Marshall

J. Prac. & Proc. 163 (1975) J. Prac. & Proc. 163 (1975)

Mary E. Clayton

Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview

Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Legal Writing and Research Commons

Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Mary E. Clayton, A Selective Bibliography of Drug Related Literature, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 163 (1975)

https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol9/iss1/11

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact repository@jmls.edu.

A SELECTIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY OF

DRUG RELATED LITERATURE

by MARY E. CLAYTON*

Included within each of the following Major Headings are foursub-headings: Books and Pamphlets, Legal Periodicals, NonlegalPeriodicals, and Reports and Studies. The Major Headings are:

LEGAL ASPECTS OF DRUG ABUSE

LEGISLATION IN THE UNITED STATES

ENGLAND AND CANADA

INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS

REHABILITATION

DRUGS AND YOUTH

OTHER SELECTED ARTICLES AND BOOKS

BIBLIOGRAPHIES

LEGAL ASPECTS OF DRUG ABUSE

Books and Pamphlets

R. BONNIE & M. SONNENREICH, LEGAL ASPECTS OF DRUG DEPEND-ENCE (1975).

F. BRACELAND, DRUG ABUSE: MEDICAL AND CRIMINAL ASPECTS(1972).

JOINT COMMITTEE ON CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION ALI-ABA,ALI-ABA COURSE OF STUDY: DRUGS AND THE CRIMINAL PROCESS(1972).

H. LEVINE, LEGAL DIMENSIONS OF DRUG ABUSE IN THE UNITED

STATES (1974).

A. LINDESMITH, THE ADDICT AND THE LAW (1965).

T. SZASZ, CEREMONIAL CHEMISTRY, THE RITUAL PERSECUTION OF

DRUGS, ADDICTS, AND PUSHERS (1974).

Legal Periodicals

Anderson, Drug Users in Court, 7 J. CRIM. L. 903 (1917).

Anslinger, Organized Protection Against Organized PredatoryCrimes-Peddling of Narcotic Drugs, 24 J. CRim. L. 636 (1933).

*B.A., Illinois State University; M.L.S., University of OregonSchool of Librarianship. Assistant Librarian, The John MarshallLaw School.

164 The John Marshall Journal of Practice and Procedure [Vol. 9:163

Aronowitz, Civil Commitment of Narcotic Addicts, 67 COLUM. L.REV. 405 (1967).

Bowman, Narcotic Addiction and Criminal Responsibility underDunham, 53 GA. L.J. 1017 (1965).

Celler, Alternative Proposal for Dealing with Drug Addiction, 27FED. PROBATION 24 (1963).

Chapman, Addict and the Community, 21 FED. PROBATION 41(1957).

Crothers, Legal Responsibilities of Drug Takers, 33 MEDICO-LEGAL J. 14 (1916).

Cushman, Relation Between Narcotic Addiction and Crime, 38FED. PROBATION 38 (1974).

Decker, Official Report of the National Commission StudyingMarihuana: More Misunderstanding, 8 U. SAN FRAN. L. REV. 1 (1973).

Comment, Drug Abuse and the Law: A Seminar, 8 VALPO. U.L.REV. 585 (1974).

Edwards, Drug Dependence: Legal Medicine and Social Regula-tion, 18 How. L.J. 107 (1973).

Frankel, Narcotic Addiction, Criminal Responsibility, and CivilCommitment, 1966 UTAH L. REV. 581.

Comment, Heroin, Marijuana and Crime: a Socio-Legal Analy-sis, 45 ST. JOHN'S L. REV. 119 (1970).

Homes, Drug Addiction: Law and Attitudes, 18 LOYOLA U. CHI.

L. REV. 39 (1971-72).

Kaplan, Role of the Law in Drug Control, 1971 DUKE L.J. 1065.

Kingsley, Legal Control of Narcotics, 23 FOOD, DRUG, COSMETICL.J. 306 (1968).

Kuh, Civil Commitment for Narcotic Addicts, 27 FED. PROBATION21 (1963).

Lichtenstein, Narcotic Addiction and the Law, 53 CHI. LEGALNEWS 262 (1921).

Lindesmith, Drug Addict: Patient or Criminal?, 31 J. CRIM. L.531 (1941).

McMorris, Decriminalization of Narcotics Addiction, 3 Am. CRIM.L.Q. 84 (1965).

O'Neill, Legal Aspects of Drug Abuse, 19 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 461(1970).

Comment, Punishment of Narcotics Addicts for Possession: a

Cruel but Usual Punishment, 56 IOWA L. REV. 578 (1971).

Symposium: Drugs and the Law, 56 CAL. L. REV. 1 (1968).

Symposium: Marajuana and the Law, 3 SUFFOLK U.L. REV. 1(1968).

Bibliography

Teff, Drugs and the Law: The Development of Control, 35 MOD-ERN L. REV. 225 (1972).

Weber, Drugs and Crime, 10 J. CIUM. L. 370 (1919).

Wolff, Narcotics Addiction and Criminality, 34 J. CRIM. L. 162(1943).

Nonlegal Periodicals

Berg, Dope Addict, Criminal or Patient?, LOOK Oct. 15, 1957, at40.

Cimino, Dowd, Andimo & West, Narcotics Addiction in theUnited States: a Nationwide Survey, 2 CONTEMP. DRUG PROBLEMS401 (1973).

Clague, Legal Strategies for Dealing with Heroin Addiction, 63AM. ECON. REV. 263 (1973).

Cumming, Control of Drug Addiction Mainly a Police Problem,33 AM. CITY 509 (1925).

Eatherly, Drug-Law Enforcement: Should We Arrest Pushers orUsers?, 82 J. POL. ECoN. 210 (1974).

Karpmen, Laws that Cause Crime, 23 AM. MERCURY 74 (1931).

Martin, Courts, the Heroin Addict and the Administration of Jus-tice, 3 CONTEMP. DRUG PROBLEMS'45 (1974).

Sparks, Narcotics and the Law, 74 COMMONWEAL 467 (1961).

Stevens, Make Dope Legal, 205 HARPER 40 (1952).

Reports and Studies

C. Coon & R. Harris, The Release Report on Drug Offenders andthe Law (1969).

LEGISLATION IN THE UNITED STATES

Books and Pamphlets

W. ELDRIDGE, NARCOTICS AND THE LAW: A CRITIQUE OF THEAMERICAN EXPERIMENT IN NARCOTIC DRUG CONTROL (1962).

R. KING, THE DRUG HANG-UP; AMERICA'S FIFTY-YEAR FOLLY(1972).

H. MORGAN, YESTERDAY'S ADDICTS: AMERICAN SOCIETY AND DRUGABUSE, 1865-1920 (1974).

D. MUSTA, THE AMERICAN DISEASE; ORIGINS OF NARCOTIC CONTROL(1973).

Legal Periodicals

Anslinger, The Harrison Narcotic Act and the Practitioner, 1 AM.J. MED. JUR. 184 (1938).

1975]

166 The John Marshall Journal of Practice and Procedure [Vol. 9:163

Anslinger, Narcotic-Drug Legislation and Its Further ProtectiveExtensions, 10 FOOD, DRUG, COSMETIC L.J. 133 (1955).

Anslinger, The Reason For Uniform State Narcotic Legislation,21 GEO. L.J. 52 (1932).

D'Auria, New York Statutory Scheme for Rehabilitation of DrugAddicts Through Civil Commitment, 5 NEW ENG. L. REV. 151 (1970).

Bonnie & Whitebread, Forbidden Fruit and the Tree of Knowl-edge: An Inquiry into the Legal History of American Marijuana Pro-hibition, 56 VA. L. REv. 971 (1971).

Cazalas, Addiction in the United States: A Medical-Legal His-tory, 18 LOYOLA U. CHI. L. RE.. 1 (1971-72).

Comment, Constitutional Law-Federal Marijuana Statutes: AnEmpirical Appraisal of Criminal Statutory Presumptions, 19 DEPAULL. REv. 184 (1969).

Crothers, Failure of the Harrison Law, 33 MEDICO-LEGAL J. 7(1917).

Comment, Division of Drug Abuses from the Criminal JusticeSystem: Georgia's Proposed Legislation, 23 EMORY L.J. 1071 (1974).

Comment, Due Process for the Narcotic Addict? The New YorkCompulsory Commitment Procedures, 43 N.Y.U.L. REV. 1172 (1968).

Ellis, General Outline of Federal Narcotics Statutes, 18 FOOD,DRUG, COSMETIC L.J. 372 (1963).

Galliher, McCartney & Baum, Nebraska's Marijuana Law: ACase of Unexpected Legislative Innovation, 8 L. & Soc'Y REV. 441(1974).

Gassman, Harrison Act and Drug Addiction, 22 N.Y. CTY. B.BULL. 22 (1964).

Gordon, Relation of Legislation Acts to the Problem of Drug Ad-diction, 33 MEDICO-LEGAL J. 4 (1917).

Greenstein, DiBianco, Marijuana Laws-A Crime Against Hu-manity, 48 N.D. LAWYER 314 (1972).

Hoge, The Drug Law in Historical Perspective, 1 FOOD, DRUG,

COSMETIc L.Q. 48 (1946).

Hughes, United States Narcotics Laws, 1964 CRIM. L. REv. 520.

Comment, "Imminent Danger of Addition" as a Ground For In-voluntary Commitment in California, 64 MIcH. L. REV. 546 (1966).

Kaplan, Marijuana Laws: An Empirical Study of Enforcementand Administration in Los Angeles County, 15 U.C.L.A.L. REV. 1499(1968).

King, Narcotics Bureau and the Harrison Act: Jailing the Heal-ers and the Sick, 62 YALE L.J. 736 (1953).

McNamara, History of United States Anti-Opium Policy, 37 FED.PROBATION 15 (1973).

1975] Bibliography 167

Comment, Marijuana Laws: A Need for Reform, 22 ARK. L. REV.

359 (1968).

Comment, Model Narcotics Law Provisions, 8 ST. Louis U.L.J.579 (1964).

Comment, New Narcotic Addiction Control Act, 31 ALBANY L.REV. 336 (1967).

Remondino, Harrison Drug Law and Its Possibilities, 34 MEDICO-

LEGAL J. 1 (1917).

Rizzo, The New Massachusetts Drug Law: A Preliminary As-sessment, 18 INT'L J. OFFENDER THERAPY & COMP. CRIMINOLOGY 33(1974).

Rosenthal, Plea for Amelioration of the Marihuana Laws, 47TEXAS L. REV. 1359 (1968).

Sharpe, Pot Full of Discretion: Comprehensive Drug Abuse Pre-vention and Control Act of 1970, 34 TEXAS B.J. 397 (1971).

Stern, Reforming Marijuana Laws, 58 A.B.A.J. 578 (1971).

Stormont, Barbiturate Drug Legislation: Address, 7 FooD, DRUG,

CosMETIc L.J. 215 (1952).

di Suvero, Drug Offenses and the New Penal Law, 32 BROOKLYN

L. REV. 287 (1966).

Vinnedge, Ethics and Legislation of Drug and Alcohol Addiction,33 MEDICO-LEGAL J. 18 (1916).

Weigel, State Legislation Restricting the Sale of Drugs, 13 FOOD,DRUG, CosMETic L.J. 48 (1958).

Nonlegal Periodicals

Berger, Eggston, Should We Legalize Narcotics?, 38 CORONET 30(1955).

Cagliostro, New York's New Drug Laws-An Analysis, 4 J. DRUG

ISSUES 117 (1974).

Drug Addiction and the Harrison Law, 56 REV. REVIEWS 435(1917).

Drug Crackdown; New York State Drug Laws, 169 NEW REPUB-

LIC 8 (1973).

Drug Usage: A Two-Way Attack, 67 U.S. NEWS & WORLD REP.9 (1969).

Holden, Legislation and Narcotics, 45 SURVEY 728 (1921).

Lindesmith, Our Immoral Drug Laws, 186 NATioN 558 (1958).

New Move for Reform, 94 TIME 26 (1969).

Seibert & Gitchoff, The Strategy of Narcotics Law Enforcement:Its Implications and Effects, 2 J. DRUG ISSUES 29 (1972).

168 The John Marshall Journal of Practice and Procedure [Vol. 9:163

Reports and Studies

HUDSON INSTITUTE, POLICY CONCERNING DRUG ABUSE IN NEWYORK STATE; FINAL REPORT (1970).

NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE

LAWS, UNIFORM NARCOTIC DRUG ACT (1933).

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON DRUG

ADDICTION, 1929-1941 AND COLLECTED REPRINTS, 1930-1941 (1941).

M. SONNENREICH, U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, HANDBOOK

OF FEDERAL NARCOTIC AND DANGEROUS DRUG LAWS (1969).

ENGLAND AND CANADA

Books and Pamphlets

H. JUDSON, HEROIN ADDICTION IN BRITAIN, WHAT AMERICANS CANLEARN FROM THE ENGLISH EXPERIENCE (1974).

E. SCHUR, NARCOTIC ADDICTION IN BRITAIN AND AMERICA; THE IM-PACT OF PUBLIC POLICY (1962).

R. WHITAKER, DRUGS AND THE LAW; THE CANADIAN SCENE (1969).

- Legal Periodicals

Anslinger, Comparison of Some Important National Narcotic-Control Policies of the United States and Canada, 12 FoOD, DRUG,

COSMETIC L.J. 88 (1957).

Card, Aspects of British Drug Legislation, 20 U. TORONTO L.J.88 (1970).

Card, Drugs and the Law in Britain, 17 ST. Louis U.L.J. 301(1973).

Hammond, Control of Barbiturates and Amphetamines in Can-ada, 15 U. TORONTO L.J. 443 (1964).

Hossick, Canada's Narcotic Drug Problem, 7 FooD, DRUG, COS-

METIC L.J. 244 (1952).

James, Drug Abuse in Britain, 13 MED. SCI. & L. 246 (1973).

Marihuana and the Narcotic Control Act, 3 U. BRIT. COL. L. REV.

3 (1967).

Opiate Addiction in Canada: the Interaction Between Legislationand Social Theory, 21 U. TORONTO FAC. L. REV. 5 (1963).

Schur, British Narcotic Policies, 51 J. CRIM. L. 619 (1961).

Trasov, History of the Opium and Narcotic Drug Legislation inCanada, 4 CRIM. L.Q. 274 (1962).

Nonlegal Periodicals

Fick, Hope and Help for Narcotics Addicts; Iroquois Rehabilita-tion Center, 26 CONSERVATIONIST 28-29 (1971).

1975] Bibliography 169

Judson, Reporter at Large; the British and Heroin (pts. 1 & 2),NEW YORKER Sept. 24, 1973, at 76 and Oct. 1, 1973, at 70.

Kobler, Britain's Rx for Our Drug Addicts, 239 SATURDAY EVEN-ING POST 74 (1966).

Moraes, Walk on London's Wild Side, N.Y. TIMES MAGAZINE, Sept.13, 1970, at 100.

Samuels, British Way with the Junkie, N.Y. TIMES MAGAZINE,Oct. 18, 1964, at 37.

Simons, What the English are Doing about Heroin, LOOK, APRIL7, 1970, at 47.

Reports and Studies

H. BRILL AND G. LARIMOSE, ALBANY, N.Y.: STATE NARCOTIC AD-DICTION CONTROL COMMISSION, SECOND ON-SITE STUDY OF THE BRIT-

ISH NARCOTIC SYSTEM (1968).

GREAT BRITAIN ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON DRUG DEPENDENCE, THEREHABILITATION OF DRUG ADDICTS: REPORT OF THE ADVISORY COM-MITTEE ON DRUG DEPENDENCE (1969).

INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS

Books and Pamphlets

C. WIGHTON, DOPE INTERNATIONAL (1964).

Legal Periodicals

Ansley, International Efforts to Control Narcotics, 50 J. CRIM.L. 105 (1959).

Bassiouni, International Narcotic Control System: a Proposal, 46ST. JOHN'S L. REV. 713 (1972).

Bevans, International Conventions in the Field of Narcotic Drugs,37 TEMP. L.Q. 41 (1963).

Cabranes, International Law and Control of the Drug Traffic, 7INT'L L. 761 (1973).

Cohrrsen and Hoover, International Control of Dangerous Drugs,9 J. INT'L L. & ECoN. 81 (1974).

Drug Control--Protocol Amending the Single Convention onNarcotic Drugs, 1961-Protocol Strengthens the Authority of theInternational Narcotics Control Board, 6 VAND. J. TRANSNATIONAL L.624 (1973).

Waddell, International Narcotic Control, 64 AM. J. INT'L L. 310(1970).

Nonlegal Periodicals

Greenberg, Hash in Holland: the Dutch Find It Easier To LetTraffic Flourish; Youth Clubs as Drug Centers, 165 SCIENCE 476.

170 The John Marshall Journal of Practice and Procedure [Vol. 9:163

Reports and Studies

Declaration by the Attorneys General on the Narcotics Traffic,United States-Mexico Joint Cooperation, 63 DEPT. STATE BULL. 300(1970).

Department Warns of Penalties for Drug Violations Abroad, 62DEPT. STATE BULL. 549 (1970).

Gross, Bilateral and Multilateral Efforts to Intensify Drug AbuseControl Programs, 66 DEPT. STATE BULL. 504 (1972).

Gross, Collective International Effort Against Drug Abuse, 67DEPT. STATE BULL. 401 (1972).

Gross, International Narcotics Control Summary, 66 DEPT. STATEBULL. 163 (1972).

International Scientific Conference on Narcotics Control Held atParis, 69 DEPT. STATE BULL. 681 (1973).

Lafontant, U.S. Reaffirms Support of Efforts of U.N. in DrugAbuse Control, 68 DEPT. STATE BULL. 110 (1973).

Richardson, Strengthened Programs of International Cooperationfor Halting the Illicit Supply of Drugs, 62 DEPT. STATE BULL. 544(1970).

REHABILITATION

Books and Pamphlets

D. CASRIEL & G. DAYTOP, THREE ADDICTS AND THEIR CURE (1971).

D. CASRIEL, So FAIR A HOUSE: THE STORY OF SYNANON (1963).

G. ENDORE, SYNANON (1968).

R. MEYER, GUIDE TO DRUG REHABILITATION; A PUBLIC HEALTH AP-PROACH (1972).

L. YABLONSKY, THE TUNNEL BACK: SYNANON (1965).

Legal Periodicals

Bucaro & Cazalas, Methadone: Treatment and Control of Nar-cotic Addiction, 44 TUL. L. REV. 14 (1969).

Control and Treatment of Narcotic Addicts: Civil Commitmentin California, 6 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 35 (1969).

Farkas, Peterson, & Barr, New Developments in the Federal Bu-reau of Prisons Addict Treatment Program, 34 FED. PROBATION 52(1970).

Graham, Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act, 35 D.C. BAR J. 30(1968).

Kleeman & Posner, Comprehensive Drug Rehabilitation andTreatment Act: Treatment in Lieu of Prosecution, 56 MASS. L.Q.171 (1971).

1975] Bibliography 171

Klonsky, Extended Supervision for Discharged Addict-Parolees,31 FED. PRORATION 47 (1967).

Lynch, California Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Law, 12 N.Y.L.F. 369 (1966).

McMorris, Narcotic Clinics-An American Viewpoint, 8 Crmi.L.Q. 182 (1965).

Peterson, Parvis, Farkas, Federal Bureau of Prisons, TreatmentProgram for Narcotic Addicts, 33 FED. PROBATION 35 (1969).

Scrignar & Swanson, Louisiana Narcotics Rehabilitation Commis-sion, 18 LA. B.J. 23 (1970).

Wood, 18,000 Addicts Later: A Look at California's Civil AddictProgram, 37 FED. PROBATION 26 (1973).

Wood, Preventive Law: the California Rehabilitation Center, 2SAN DIEGO L. REV. 54 (1965).

Nonlegal Periodicals

Berliner, Bridging the Gap Between Institution and Communityin the Treatment of Narcotic Addicts, 52 MENTAL HYGIENE 263 (1968).

London, Cagliostro, Knop, Lang, Newman, Civil Commitment ofHeroin Addicts: A Panel Discussion, 1 CONTEMP. DRUG PROBLEMS 561(1972).

Methadone Maintenance Program: a Panel, 1 CONTEMP. DRUGPROBLEMS 117 (1972).

Morgenbesser, Role of a Police Officer in a Drug Treatment Pro-gram, 3 CONTEMP. DRUG PROBLEMS 312 (1974).

O'Connell, Hope from Horizon House, 125 AMERICA 282 (1971).

Pompian, New Strategy Against Drug Addiction, Medical Coun-seling Clinics of Chicago, 34 TODAY'S HEALTH 42 (1956).

Trying to Help the G.I. Addicts; Palo Alto V.A. Hospital Pro-gram, LIFE July 23, 1971 at 3.

Reports and Studies

J. BERECOCHEA, CALIFORNIA: DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, RESEARCHDIv., THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A HALFWAY HOUSE FOR CIVILLY COM-MITTED NARCOTICS ADDICTS (1971).

J. CALOT, NEW YORK: DEPT. OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, COMM. SERVICESoc. OF N.Y., A STUDY OF FOUR VOLUNTARY TREATMENT AND REHABILI-TATION PROGRAMS FOR NEW YORK CITY'S NARCOTIC ADDICTS; THE LONGROAD BACK FROM A LIVING DEATH (1967).

Hearings on Civil Commitment and Treatment of Narcotic Ad-dicts Before the Comm. on the Judiciary, 89th Cong., 1st and 2d Sess.(1966).

172 The John Marshall Journal of Practice and Procedure [Vol. 9:163

Hearings on Drug Dependence-Extent of Problem and Treat-ment Modalities Before the Subcomm. on Alcoholism and Narcoticsof the Comm. on Labor and Public Welfare (1971).

Hearings on Juvenile Delinquency; Treatment and Rehabilitationof Juvenile Drug Addicts Before the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary(1951).

Hearings on Narcotics Research, Rehabilitation and TreatmentBefore the House Select Comm. on Crime (1971).

DRUGS AND YOUTH

Books and Pamphlets

J. BRENNER, R. COLES, D. MEAGHER, DRUGS AND YOUTH: MEDICAL,PSYCHIATRIC, AND LEGAL FACTS (1970).

A. CAIN, YOUNG PEOPLE AND DRUGS (1969).

J. CAREY, THE COLLEGE DRUG SCENE (1968).

I. CHEIN, NARCOTICS DELINQUENCY AND SOCIAL POLICY; THE ROADTO H (1964).

C. DESCHIN, THE TEENAGER IN A DRUGGED SOCIETY; A SYMPTOM

OF CRISIS (1972).

R. GOLDSTEIN, 1 IN 7; DRUGS ON CAMPUS (1966).

E. HARMS, DRUG ADDICTION IN YOUTH (1965).

W. SEYMOUR, THE YOUNG DIE QUIETLY; THE NARCOTICS PROBLEMIN AMERICA (1972).

F. WISE, YOUTH AND DRUGS; PREVENTION, DETECTION, AND CURE(1971).

Legal Periodicals

Rogers, Narcotic Addiction Among Young People, 34 FED. PRO-BATION 34 (1970).

Nonlegal Periodicals

Bonafante, Town in Trouble; Plague of Drugs Among Kids inCalifornia, LIFE March 21, 1969, at 48.

Clift, Drugs: a New Way Out? Experiment at Savannah, Geor-gia High School, MCCALLS Oct. 1971, at 46.

Jones, Dealing with Drug Users in the Schools: What PolicyShould be Established?, EDUCATION DIGEST Jan. 1972, at 17.

Linkletter, How Schools Can Fight Drug Abuse, EDUCATION DI-iGEST Feb. 1971, at 28.

Murray, Hard Lesson; Eugene, Oregon, Drop-in Youth Centers,PARKS AND RECREATION Feb. 1971, at 28.

Bibliography

Shayon, To Youth, with Love; White House Conference on theDrug Problem, SAT. REV. Nov. 21, 1970, at 57.

Smallenburg, Smallenburg, Farnsworth, Powelson and Brown,Drug Scene, Has It Changed, PTA MAGAZINE Dec. 1971, at 2.

Yolles and Yolles, Psychiatrist and His Daughter Talk Franklyabout Marijuana; Interview, SEVENTEEN Oct. 1970, at 134.

Yolles, Student Use of Drugs: Facts and Fables, EDUCATION DI-GEST Nov. 1971, at 13.

Zima and Smith, High School Students, Drugs, and Teachers, Re-sults of Poll of Students, 99 SCHOOL & Soc. 250 (1971).

Reports and Studies

RUTGERS SYMPOSIUM ON DRUG ABUSE, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY,1968, DRUGS AND YOUTH; PROCEEDINGS (1969).

OTHER SELECTED ARTICLES AND BOOKS

Books and Pamphlets

ADDICTS AND DRUG ABUSES; CURRENT APPROACHES TO THE PROB-LEM (N. Strause ed. 1971).

R. BLUM, SOCIETY AND DRUGS; SOCIAL AND CULTURAL OBSERVA-TIONS (1969).

L. BRILL & L. LIEBERMAN, AUTHORITY AND ADDICTION (1969).

R. BROTMAN, A COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH APPROACH TO DRUGADDICTION (1968).

G. CLARIDGE, DRUGS AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (1970).

F. DAWTRY, SOCIAL PROBLEMS OF DRUG ABUSE: A GUIDE FOR SO-

CIAL WORKERS (1968).

T. DUSTER, THE LEGISLATION OF MORALITY: LAW, DRUGS ANDMORAL JUDGMENT (1970).

P. HEALY, DRUG DEPENDENCE AND ABUSE RESOURCE BOOK (1971).

N. IMLAH, DRUGS IN MODERN SOCIETY (1971).

S. JEFFEE, NARCOTICS: AN AMERICAN PLAN (1966).

N. KITTRIE, THE RIGHT TO BE DIFFERENT (1971).

L. KOLB, DRUG ADDICTION, A MEDICAL PROBLEM (1962).

Y. KRON & E. BROWN, MAINLINE TO NOWHERE; THE MAKING OF AHEROIN ADDICT (1965).

R. KUNNES, THE AMERICAN HEROIN EMPIRE; POWER, PROFITS ANDPOLITICS (1973).

P. LAURIE, DRUGS: MEDICAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL FACTS(1967).

19751

174 The John Marshall Journal of Practice and Procedure [Vol. 9:163

A. LEWIS, MODERN DRUG ENCYCLOPEDIA AND THERAPEUTIC INDEX(13th ed. 1975).

A. LINDESMITH, ADDICTIONS AND OPIATES (1968).

D. LOURIA, OVERCOMING DRUGS; A PROGRAM FOR ACTION (1971).

D. MAURER & V. VOGEL, NARCOTICS AND NARCOTIC ADDICTION (3ded. 1967).

A. MEYER, SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS IN OPIATE ADDIC-TION: A REVIEW OF RESEARCH FINDINGS (1962).

I. MORAISSET & J. COUSINS, DRUGS (1974).

N. REGUSH, THE DRUG ADDICTION BUSINESS; A DENUNCIATION OF

THE DEHUMANIZING POLITICS AND PRACTICES OF THE SO-CALLED Ex-PERTS (1971).

RESEARCH ON METHODS AND PROGRAMS OF DRUG EDUCATION (M.Goodstadt ed. 1974).

J. SALTMAN, WHAT CAN WE Do ABOUT DRUG ABUSE (1966).

C. SANDERS, THE HIGH AND THE MIGHTY: MIDDLE-CLASS DRUGUSERS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM (1972).

R. SCHAAP, TURNED ON (1967).

J. STEARN, THE SEEKERS (1963).

STREET DRUG ANALYSIS AND ITS SOCIAL AND CLINICAL IMPLICATION

(J. Marshman ed. 1974).J. YOUNG, THE DRUGTAKERS: THE SOCIAL MEANING OF DRUG USE

(1971).

N. ZINBERG & J. ROBERTSON, DRUGS AND THE PUBLIC (1972).

M. ZWERIN, THE SILENT SOUND OF NEEDLES (1969).

Legal Periodicals

Burnett, Crisis in Narcotics-Are Existing Federal Penalties Ef-fective?, 10 WM. & MARY L. REV. 636 (1969).

Civil Commitment of Narcotic Addicts, 76 YALE L.J. 1160 (1967).

Cohen, Control of Drug Abuse, 34 FED. PROBATION 32 (1970).

Contemporary Problems of Drug Abuse: A National Symposiumfor Law and Medical Students, 18 VILL. L. REV. 787 (1973).

Drug Abuse, 30 MONT. L. REV. 219 (1969).

Drug Addiction: An Illness or a Crime, 13 LOYOLA U. CHI. L.REV. 99 (1966-67).

Kittrie, Marijuana-The Right to Truth, 23 S.C.L. REV. 361(1971).

Lang, President's Crime Commission Task Force Report on Nar-cotics and Drug Abuse: A Critique of the Apologia, 43 N.D. LAWYER

847 (1968).

1975J Bibliography 175

iUndesmith, "Dopefiend" Mythology, 31 J. Cm. L. 199 (1940).

McKevitt, "Untouchable" Acts of Addition, 55 A.B.A.J. 454(1969).

McMorris, Can We Punish for the Acts of Addiction?, 54 A.B.A.J.1081 (1968).

Miers, Mental Element in Drug Off ences, 20 N. IRE. L.Q. 370(1969).

Narcotic Addiction: A Continuing Problem, 19 SYRACUSE L. REV.

768 (1968).

Narcotic Problem-A Symposium, 1 U.C.L.A.L. REV. 405 (1954).

Narcotics Addiction: Civil Committment and the Report of thePresident's Advisory Commission, 39 N.D. LAWYER 689 (1964).

Narcotics Problem: A Symposium, 12 CATH. LAWYER 98 (1966).

Short Course on Drug Abuse: A Symposium, 24 Sw. L.J. 403(1970).

Nonlegal Periodicals

Addiction, Medicine and the Law, 223 SCIENTIFIC AM. 50 (1970).

Alsop, City Killer, NEWSWEEK, Feb. 8, 1971, at 104.

Ambrose, War Against Drug Abuse, 38 VITAL SPEECHES 738(1972).

America's Battle Against the White Death, NEWSWEEK, March 29,1971, at 41.

Astor & Mothner, How 10 Cities Fight Drugs, LOOK, Feb. 23, 1971,at 73.

Colburn & Colburn, Integrity House: The Addict as a Total Insti-tution, 10 SOCIETY, May, 1973, at 39.

Drug Offenses and Decriminalization: A Symposium, 3 HUMANRTS. 1 (1973).

Sutton, Drugs: Ten Years to Doomsday?, SAT. REV., Nov. 4, 1970,

at 18.

Taqi, Drugs as Fashion, 221 CONTEMP. REV. 195 (1972).

Treffert, Community Response: From Alarm to Prevention, 2CONTEMP. DRUG PROB. 239 (1973).

Walsh, Narcotics and Drug Abuse; A Presidential Prescription,165 Sci. 377 (1969).

Reports and Studies

JOINT COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION AND THEAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ON NARCOTIC DRUGS, DRUG ADDIC-TION: CRIME OR DISEASE? (1961).

176 The John Marshall Journal of Practice and Procedure [Vol. 9:163

NATIONAL COMMISSION ON MARIHUANA AND DRUG ABUSE, DRUGUSE IN AMERICA: PROBLEM IN PERSPECTIVE (1973).

UNITED STATES PRESIDENT'S ADVISORY COMMISSION ON NARCOTICAND DRUG ABUSE, FINAL REPORT (1963).

UNITED STATES PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENTAND ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, TASK FORCE ON NARCOTICS AND DRUGABUSE, NARCOTICS AND DRUG ABUSE; ANNOTATIONS AND CONSULTANTS'

PAPERS (1967).

Farber, Ours Is the Addicted Society, N.Y. TIMES MAG. Dec. 11,1966, at 43.

Hammond, Why Drug Abuse Education Is Failing in America, 2CONTEMP. DRUG PROB. 247 (1973).

Irwin, Rational Approach to Drug Abuse Prevention, 2 CONTEMP.DRUG PROB. 3 (1973).

Kasindorf, Heroin Plague: What Can be Done?, NEWSWEEK,

July 5, 1971, at 27.

Lindesmith, Sociological Theory of Drug Addiction, 43 AM. J.Soc. 593 (1938).

Lock'em up; N. Rockefeller's Proposal of Mandatory Life Sen-tences for All Hard Drug Pushers, TIME, Jan. 15, 1973, at 10.

Nugent, His Brother's Keeper; M. Wright of the Illinois DrugAbuse Program, EBONY, Oct. 1972, at 72.

Pryor, Traffic in Narcotics, 35 VITAL SPEECHES 308 (1969).

Snider, Junkie Personality, 68 ScI. DIGEST 62 (1970).

Straus, Speaking Out: Giving Drugs to Addicts, SAT. Ev. POST,August 8, 1964, at 6.

1962 WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON NARCOTICS AND DRUG ABUSEPROCEEDINGS (1963).

BIBLIOGRAPHIES

Bibliography, 2 CONTEMP. DRUG PROB. 215 (1973).

Bibliography, 2 CONTEMP. DRUG PROB. 347 (1973).

Greenberg & Adler, Crime and Addiction: An Empirical Analy-sis of the Literature, 1920-1973, 3 CONTEMP. DRUG PROB. 221 (1974).

0. KALANT, AN INTERIM GUIDE TO THE CANNABIS LITERATURE

(1968).

J. MENDITTO, DRUGS OF ADDICTION AND NoN-ADDICTION, THEIR

USE AND ABUSE; A COMPREHENSIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY, 1960-1969 (1970).

G. MERCER, NON-ALCOHOLIC DRUGS AND PERSONALITY; A SELECTEDANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY (1972).

A. MEYER, SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS IN OPIATE ADDIC-TION; A REVIEW OF RESEARCH FINDINGS, TOGETHER WITH AN ANNO-

TATED BIBLIOGRAPHY (1962).

1975] Bibliography 177

L. MOORE, MARIJUANA BIBLIOGRAPHY, 1960-1968 (1969).

H. SELLS, A BIBLIOGRAPHY ON DRUG DEPENDENCE (1967).

D. TOMPKINS, DRUG ADDICTION: A BIBLIOGRAPHY (1960).

UNITED STATES NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH, BIBLIO-GRAPHY ON DRUG DEPENDENCE AND ABUSE; 1928-1966 (1967).

UNITED STATES NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE, NARCOTIC ADDIC-TION: A SELECTED LIST OF REFERENCES IN ENGLISH (1959).