15
Review A review on chemical coagulation/occulation technologies for removal of colour from textile wastewaters Akshaya Kumar Verma, Rajesh Roshan Dash, Puspendu Bhunia * Department of Civil Engineering, School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Orissa 751013, India article info Article history: Received 13 April 2011 Received in revised form 26 August 2011 Accepted 15 September 2011 Available online 5 October 2011 Keywords: Dye Decolourisation Coagulation Flocculation Textile wastewater abstract Textile industry is one of the most chemically intensive industries on the earth and the major polluter of potable water. It generates huge quantities of complex chemical substances as a part of unused materials including dyes in the form of wastewater during various stages of textile processing. The direct discharge of this wastewater into environment affects its ecological status by causing various undesirable changes. As environmental protection becomes a global concern, industries are nding novel solutions for developing technologies that can diminish the environmental damage. However, colour removal from textile wastewater by means of cheaper and environmental friendly technologies is still a major chal- lenge. In this manuscript, several options of decolourisation of textile wastewater by chemical means have been reviewed. Based on the present review, some novel pre-hydrolysed coagulants such as Pol- yaluminium chloride (PACl), Polyaluminium ferric chloride (PAFCl), Polyferrous sulphate (PFS) and Pol- yferric chloride (PFCl) have been found to be more effective and suggested for decolourisation of the textile wastewater. Moreover, use of natural coagulants for textile wastewater treatment has also been emphasised and encouraged as the viable alternative because of their eco-friendly nature. Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Textile industries are one of the biggest users of water and complex chemicals during textile processing at various processing stages. The unused materials from the processes are discharged as wastewater that is high in colour, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), pH, temperature, turbidity and toxic chemicals. The direct discharge of this wastewater into the water bodies like lakes, rivers etc. pollutes the water and affects the ora and fauna. Efuent from textile industries contains different types of dyes, which because of high molecular weight and complex structures, shows very low biodegradability (Hsu and Chiang, 1997; Pala and Tokat, 2002; Kim et al., 2004; Gao et al., 2007). Also, the direct discharge of this industrial efuent into sewage networks produces disturbances in biological treatment processes. These efuents produce high concentrations of inorganic salts, acids and bases in biological reactors leading to the increase of treatment costs (Gholami et al., 2001; Babu et al., 2007). Moreover, traditionally produced fabric industries generate residuals of chemicals that evaporate into the air that we breathe or are absorbed through our skin. Some of the chemicals such as heavy metals either in free form in efuents or adsorbed in the suspended solids are either carcinogenic (Tamburlini et al., 2002; Bayramoglu and Arica, 2007) or may cause harm to children even before birth, while others may trigger allergic reactions in some people. Industrial emissions and the waste efuents generated from the factories are associated with heavy disease burden (WHO, 2000, 2002) and this could be one of the reasons for short life expec- tancy of 64 years in India compared to developed countries such as Japan, where life expectancy is 83 years (UNICEF, 2008). Although the industrial sector only accounts for 3% of the annual water withdrawals in India, its contribution to water pollution, particu- larly in urban areas, is considerable. Wastewater generation from this sector has been estimated as 55 10 6 m 3 per day, of which 68.5 10 3 m 3 are dumped directly into local rivers and streams without prior treatment (MOWR, 2000). The developing countries contribute the largest amount of textile wastewater. For an example, developing countries of South Asia contributed around 35% textile wastewater out of total industrial wastewater generated by South Asian countries in 2001 (World Bank, 2005). Out of seven Abbreviations: BOD, biochemical oxygen demand; COD, chemical oxygen demand; TDS, total dissolved solid; AOX, absorbable organic halides; SS, suspended solid; TSS, total suspended solid; DS, dissolved solid; NTU, nephelometric turbidity unit; DO, dissolved oxygen; UV, ultraviolet; nm, nanometer; AOP, advanced oxidation process; PACl, polyaluminium chloride; PFCl, polyferric chloride; PFS, polyferric sulphate; PAFCl, polyaluminium ferric chloride. * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ91 674 2300 714; fax: þ91 674 2301 983. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (A.K. Verma), [email protected] (R.R. Dash), [email protected] (P. Bhunia). Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Environmental Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jenvman 0301-4797/$ e see front matter Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.012 Journal of Environmental Management 93 (2012) 154e168

A Review on Chemical Coagulation_flocculation Technologies for Removal of Colour From Textile Wastewaters

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

coagulação

Citation preview

  • Review

    la

    ndBh

    DecolourisationCoagulation

    e mhugof wiroion

    e biggeocessine procbioche

    larly in urban areas, is considerable. Wastewater generation fromthis sector has been estimated as 55 106 m3 per day, of which68.5 103 m3 are dumped directly into local rivers and streamswithout prior treatment (MOWR, 2000). The developing countriescontribute the largest amount of textile wastewater. For anexample, developing countries of South Asia contributed around35% textile wastewater out of total industrial wastewater generatedby South Asian countries in 2001 (World Bank, 2005). Out of seven

    Abbreviations: BOD, biochemical oxygen demand; COD, chemical oxygendemand; TDS, total dissolved solid; AOX, absorbable organic halides; SS, suspendedsolid; TSS, total suspended solid; DS, dissolved solid; NTU, nephelometric turbidityunit; DO, dissolved oxygen; UV, ultraviolet; nm, nanometer; AOP, advancedoxidation process; PACl, polyaluminium chloride; PFCl, polyferric chloride; PFS,polyferric sulphate; PAFCl, polyaluminium ferric chloride.* Corresponding author. Tel.: 91 674 2300 714; fax: 91 674 2301 983.

    E-mail addresses: [email protected] (A.K. Verma), [email protected]

    Contents lists available at

    Journal of Environm

    journal homepage: www.els

    Journal of Environmental Management 93 (2012) 154e168(R.R. Dash), [email protected] (P. Bhunia).(BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), pH, temperature, turbidityand toxic chemicals. The direct discharge of this wastewater intothe water bodies like lakes, rivers etc. pollutes the water and affectsthe ora and fauna. Efuent from textile industries containsdifferent types of dyes, which because of high molecular weightand complex structures, shows very low biodegradability (Hsu andChiang, 1997; Pala and Tokat, 2002; Kim et al., 2004; Gao et al.,2007). Also, the direct discharge of this industrial efuent intosewage networks produces disturbances in biological treatment

    metals either in free form in efuents or adsorbed in the suspendedsolids are either carcinogenic (Tamburlini et al., 2002; Bayramogluand Arica, 2007) or may cause harm to children even before birth,while others may trigger allergic reactions in some people.

    Industrial emissions and the waste efuents generated from thefactories are associated with heavy disease burden (WHO, 2000,2002) and this could be one of the reasons for short life expec-tancy of 64 years in India compared to developed countries such asJapan, where life expectancy is 83 years (UNICEF, 2008). Althoughthe industrial sector only accounts for 3% of the annual waterwithdrawals in India, its contribution to water pollution, particu-FlocculationTextile wastewater

    1. Introduction

    Textile industries are one of thcomplex chemicals during textile prstages. The unused materials from thwastewater that is high in colour,0301-4797/$ e see front matter 2011 Elsevier Ltd.doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.012have been reviewed. Based on the present review, some novel pre-hydrolysed coagulants such as Pol-yaluminium chloride (PACl), Polyaluminium ferric chloride (PAFCl), Polyferrous sulphate (PFS) and Pol-yferric chloride (PFCl) have been found to be more effective and suggested for decolourisation of thetextile wastewater. Moreover, use of natural coagulants for textile wastewater treatment has also beenemphasised and encouraged as the viable alternative because of their eco-friendly nature.

    2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    st users of water andg at various processingesses are discharged asmical oxygen demand

    processes. These efuents produce high concentrations of inorganicsalts, acids and bases in biological reactors leading to the increase oftreatment costs (Gholami et al., 2001; Babu et al., 2007). Moreover,traditionally produced fabric industries generate residuals ofchemicals that evaporate into the air that we breathe or areabsorbed through our skin. Some of the chemicals such as heavyKeywords:Dyetextile wastewater by means of cheaper and environmental friendly technologies is still a major chal-lenge. In this manuscript, several options of decolourisation of textile wastewater by chemical meansdeveloping technologies that can diminish the environmental damage. However, colour removal fromA review on chemical coagulation/occufrom textile wastewaters

    Akshaya Kumar Verma, Rajesh Roshan Dash, PuspeDepartment of Civil Engineering, School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology

    a r t i c l e i n f o

    Article history:Received 13 April 2011Received in revised form26 August 2011Accepted 15 September 2011Available online 5 October 2011

    a b s t r a c t

    Textile industry is one of thpotable water. It generatesincluding dyes in the formof this wastewater into envAs environmental protectAll rights reserved.tion technologies for removal of colour

    u Bhunia*

    ubaneswar, Orissa 751 013, India

    ost chemically intensive industries on the earth and the major polluter ofe quantities of complex chemical substances as a part of unused materialsastewater during various stages of textile processing. The direct dischargenment affects its ecological status by causing various undesirable changes.becomes a global concern, industries are nding novel solutions for

    SciVerse ScienceDirect

    ental Management

    evier .com/locate/ jenvman

  • core countries of South Asia (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives,Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka), India is the major manufacturer oftextiles which constitute 83 composite mills and 2241 semicomposite processing units (COINDS, 2000). Hence, it can be saidthat India may be the major contributor of textile wastewater inSouth Asia. The textile industries in India are mainly located inMumbai, Surat, Ahmedabad, Coimbatore, Ludhiyana and Kanpur.

    1.1. Characteristic and composition of textile wastewater

    On the basis of waste and wastewater (or efuent) generation,the textile mills can be classied into two main groups namely dryprocessing mills and wet processing mills (ISPCH, 1995). In the dryprocessing mills, mainly solid waste is generated due to the rejectsof cotton. In the other group, desizing, scouring, bleaching, mer-cerising, dyeing, printing, and nishing are the main processingstages. The wastewater generated by textile industry includescleaning wastewater, process wastewater, noncontact coolingwastewater, and storm water. The amount of water used varieswidely in this industry, depending on the specic processes oper-ated at the mill, the equipment used, and the prevailing philosophyof water use. The components of major pollutants involved atvarious stages during wet processing of cotton-based textileindustry are shown in Fig. 1. On account of the involved complexityof different processes at different stages, textile wastewater typi-cally contains a complex mixture of chemicals. Apart from this,large numbers of associated hazards have also been reported by the

    various chemicals used in different stages of textile processing (Leeet al., 2006; Jadhav et al., 2007; Shi et al., 2007; Anouzla et al.,2009).

    Wet processing operations (including preparation, dyeing, andnishing) generate the majority of textile wastewater having veryhigh COD, BOD, TDS and very deep colour as shown in the Table 1.Large numbers of chemical constituents such as alkali, acids,bleaching chemicals, enzymes, starch, dyes, resins, solvents, waxes,oils etc. are used in the various steps during textile processing andnally comes out in the efuent after its consumption. Desizing, orthe process of removing size chemicals from textiles, is one of theindustrys largest sources of wastewater pollutants (Bisschops andSpanjers, 2003; Dos Santos et al., 2007). In this process, largeamount of size chemicals used in weaving processes are discarded.Dyeing operation generates a large portion of the industrys totalwastewater. The primary source of wastewater in dyeing operationsis spent dye bath and wash water. Such wastewater typicallycontains by-products, residual dyes, and auxiliary chemicals.Additional pollutants include cleaning solvents, such as oxalic acid(USPEA, 1997). Of the 700,000 tons of dyes produced annuallyworldwide (Papic et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2006; Riera-Torres et al.,2010), about 10e15 percent of the dyes are disposed off in efuentfrom dyeing operations (Snowden-Swan, 1995; Husain, 2006; Haiet al., 2007; Gupta and Suhas, 2009).

    Dyes in wastewater may be chemically bound to fabric bers(ATMI, 1997). Dyeing and rinsing processes for disperse dyeinggenerate about 91e129 m3 of wastewater per ton of product

    Constituents Process Wastewater characteristics

    BOD (34-50% of total), high

    Sizing

    Desizing

    n

    Yarn waste, unused starch-based sizes

    Enzymes, starch,

    High BOD, medium COD

    A.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environmental Management 93 (2012) 154e168 155Scouring

    Bleaching

    Mercerisatio

    Dyeing

    Finishing

    Printing

    waxes, ammonia

    Disinfectants and insecticides residues, NaOH, surfactants , soa p s ,

    H 2 O 2 , AOX, NaOCl, organics

    NaOH

    Colour, metals, sulphide, salts, acidity/alkalinity, formaldeh y de

    Urea, solvents , colour, metals

    Chlorinated compounds, resins, spent solvents, softeners, waxes, a ce tat e Fig. 1. The component of major pollutants involved at various stages of a textile manufacturCharoenlarp and Choyphan, 2009).High pH, TDS

    Oily fats, BOD (30% of total), high pH, temp. (70- 80 C), dark colour

    COD, temp. (70-80 C)

    Low alkalinity, low BOD, high toxicit y

    High BOD, high pH suspended solids

    High toxicity, BOD (6% of total), high dissolved solids, high pH,

    High toxicity, high COD, high BOD, high dissolved solids, hi g h p H, stron g colou r ing industry (SEAM Project, 1999; Yusuff and Sonibare, 2004; Joseph, 2007; Paul, 2008;

  • /L)

    060

    0

    I : A

    men(Snowden-Swan, 1995). Similar processes for reactive and directdyeing generate even more wastewater, about 113e151 m3 per tonof product (Snowden-Swan, 1995; Karcher et al., 2002; Riera-Torreset al., 2010). This can be attributed by the fact that disperse dyesshow higher percentage of xation to the ber as compared to acidand reactive dyes. Finishing processes typically generate waste-water containing natural and synthetic polymers and a range ofother potentially toxic substances (Snowden-Swan, 1995). Textileindustries typically generate 200e350 m3 of wastewater per ton ofnished product (Ranganathan et al., 2007; Gozlvez-Zafrilla et al.,2008) resulting in an average pollution of 100 kg COD per ton offabric (Jekel, 1997).

    Raw textile wastewater can be characterised bymeasurement ofBOD, COD, colour, suspended solids (SS), dissolved solids (DS) andheavy metals etc. Typical characteristics of textile industry waste-water generally include a wide range of pH, COD, dissolved solidsand strong colour (El-Gohary and Tawk, 2009; Lau and Ismail,2009; Ciabatti et al., 2010; Debik et al., 2010; Phalakornkule et al.,2010), which may be comparable to moderate municipal waste-water (Rott and Minke, 1999). However, the main challenge is to

    Table 1Major characteristics of real textile wastewater studied by various researchers.

    pH COD (mg/L) BOD5 (mg/L) TSS (mg/L) TDS (mg

    8.8e9.4 595 131 379 110 276 76 e11.2 2276 660a e 47.95e10 1100e4600 110e180 e 506.5e8.5 550e1000 e 100e400 e2.7 7000 e 440 93013.56 2968 e e e12e14 1500e2000 e e e10 1150 170 150 e9 750 160 e e2e10 50e5000 200e300 50e500 e8.32e9.50 278e736 137 85e354 1715e618.7 0.2 17900 100 5500 100 23900 50 1200 59.30 3900 e e e7.8 810 50.4 188 15.2 64 8.5 e13 1 2300 400 e 300 100 e6.95 3422 1112 e7.86 340 210 300 e7.5 0.3 131 18 e 75 13 1885 8a BOD7 and efuent is from reactive dye bath.b Integral of the absorbance curve in the whole visible range (400e800 nm), ADM

    A.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environ156eliminate the colour of wastewater, which is due to the remainingdyes. The major characteristics of real textile wastewater have beendescribed in the Table 1. It has been observed from the Table 1, thatthe textile wastewaters exhibit wide range of pH from 2 to 14, CODfrom 50 mg/L to approximately 18,000 mg/L, TDS from 50 mg/L toover 6000 mg/L and very strong colour. This wide variation in thecharacteristics of textile wastewater is due to complexity of mate-rials used in the textile industry during the processing of textiles.

    1.2. Effects of textile wastewater

    Textile wastewaters generated from different stages of textileprocessing contains huge amount of pollutants that are veryharmful to the environment if released without proper treatment.Harmful direct and indirect effects of textile wastewater have beensummarized in Fig. 2. The release of textile wastewater to theenvironment causes aesthetic problems as the changed colour ofthe water bodies such as lakes and rivers, after releasing ofwastewater from the industry, cannot be tolerated by the localpeople. Also, the accumulation of colour hinders sunlight pene-tration, disturbs the ecosystem of receiving water (Georgiou et al.,2003; Merzouk et al., 2010). Ground water systems are also getaffected by these pollutants due to leaching through the soil(Namasivayam and Sumithra, 2005; Khaled et al., 2009). Apart fromthis, several dyes and their decomposition derivatives have provedtoxic to aquatic life (aquatic plants, microorganisms, sh andmammals) (Georgiou et al., 2002; Kim et al., 2004; Ustun et al.,2007). Additionally, fairly intensive studies has inferred that suchcoloured allergens may undergo chemical and biological assimila-tions, cause eutrophication, consume dissolved oxygen, prevent re-oxygenation in receiving streams and have a tendency to sequestermetal ions accelerating genotoxicity andmicrotoxicity (Walsh et al.,1980; Foo and Hameed, 2010). In a wider sense, sporadic andexcessive exposure to coloured efuents is susceptible to a broadspectrum of immune suppression, respiratory, circulatory, centralnervous and neurobehavioral disorders presage as allergy, auto-immune diseases, multiple myeloma, leukemia, vomiting, hyper-ventilation, insomnia, profuse diarrhea, salivation, cyanosis,jaundice, quadriplegia, tissue necrosis, eye (or skin) infections,irritation to even lung edema (Anliker, 1986; Foo and Hameed,2010).

    1.3. Present practices for treatment of textile wastewater

    Colour Turbidity (NTU) References

    e e El-Gohary and Tawk, 2009e e Golob et al., 20051450e1475(ADMI) e Dos Santos et al., 20077.50e25.50b 15e200 Ciabatti et al., 2010

    2140 Al-Malack et al., 19993586 (C.U) 120 Joo et al., 2007Dark blue e Gozalvez-Zafrilla et al., 20081.24436nm e Selcuk, 2005e e Schrank et al., 2007>300 (C. U) e Lau and Ismail, 2009e e Phalakornkule et al., 2010e e Rodrguez et al., 2008e 240 Paschoal et al., 20090.15669nm e Haroun and Idris, 2009e e Debik et al., 2010e 5700 Bayramoglu et al., 2004>200 (Pt-Co) 130 Merzouk, 2010e e Ustun et al., 2007

    merican dye manufacturer institute, C.U: Colour Unit.

    tal Management 93 (2012) 154e168The available literature shows a large number of well estab-lished conventional decolourisation methods involving physico-chemical, chemical and biological processes, as well as some ofnew emerging techniques like sonochemical or advanced oxidationprocesses. However, there is no single economically and technicallyviable method to solve this problem and usually two or threemethods have to be combined in order to achieve adequate level ofcolour removal (Kang and Chen, 1997; Robinson et al., 2001).Researches on chemical coagulation/occulation, is observed asone of the most practised technology. Regardless of the generationof considerable amount of sludge, it is still used in developed and indeveloping countries. Because the mechanism of coagulant appliedto decolourise wastewater is still not absolutely clear, colourremoval by coagulation is found in some cases very effective, insome cases however, has been failed completely.

    Hence, the objectives of this review are the analysis of variouschemical technologies developed for decolourisation of textilewastewater, giving more stress upon chemical coagulation/occu-lation technology, short description and critical appraisal ofdecolourisation methods, comparison of their relative advantagesand disadvantages and propose for the effective and cheaperalternatives.

  • menA.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environ2. Chemical composition and structure of colour causing dyesin textile processing

    A dye is used to impart colour to a material, of which it becomesan integral part. An aromatic ring associatedwith a side chain usuallyrequired for resonance and thus to impart colour. Characterisation ofdyes is based on their chemical structure and application. They arecomposed of the atoms responsible for the dye colour called chro-mophores as well as an electron withdrawing or donating substit-uent that causes or intensies the colour of chromophores, calledauxochrome (Christie, 2001). Usual chromophores are eC]Ce(ethenyl), eC]O (carbonyl), eC]Ne (imino), eCH]S (thio-carbonyl), eN]Ne (azo), eN]O (nitroso), eNO2 (nitro) and usualauxochromes are eNH2 (amino), eCOOH (carboxylic), eSO3H (sul-phonyl) and eOH (hydroxyl) (Van der Zee, 2002). The intensity ofcolour depends upon the number of such groups. Compounds ofbenzene containing chromophore radicals are called chromogens.Such compounds, though coloured, are not dyes, since they do nothave the afnity or the ability to unite with tissue. To be a dye,a compoundmust containnotonly the chromophore groups, but alsotheadditional group(s) calledAuxochrome(s). These auxiliarygroupsare responsible for imparting theproperty of electrolytic dissociation

    Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the effect otal Management 93 (2012) 154e168 157i.e., the separation of the dyemolecule into its components or atomsand to form saltswith either acid or alkali. They can also belong to theclasses of reactive, acid, basic, direct,mordant, disperse, pigment, vat,anionic, sulphur and disperse dye (Welham, 2000). Anthraquinonedyes possesswide range of colours in thewhole visible spectrumandconstitute the second most important class of textile dyes after azodyes, which are used to give blue, green and violet colours (Christie,2001; Fontenot et al., 2003). The characteristics of different dyes thatare used widely in the textile industry have been summarised inTable 2. It has been observed from the Table 2 that reactive dyes arewidely used to colour the cotton which contribute as half of theworldwide textile-ber market. The reactive dyes that are used forcotton, show poorest rate of xation due to which textile efuentpossesses strong colour. The chemical structure of different azo dye,vatdye andanthraquinonedyemolecules comprisingof auxochromeand chromophore has been illustrated in Fig. 3.

    3. Physico-chemical methods for removal of colour fromtextile wastewaters

    Plenty of Physico-chemical methods in the form of pretreat-ment, post treatment or main treatment have been investigated by

    f textile wastewater into the environment.

  • thod

    menvarious researchers throughout the World. A brief discussion onthese methods along with a comprehensive discussion particularly,on the chemical coagulation and occulation technology for colourremoval has been presented in this section.

    One of the most commonly known methods is the ltrationtechnology. Filtration methods such as ultraltration, nano-ltration and reverse osmosis have been used for water reuse andthe chemical recovery (Marcucci et al., 2001; Fersi and Dhahbi,2008). In the textile industry, these ltration methods can beused for both ltering and recycling of not only pigment richwastewaters, but also mercerising and bleaching wastewaters. Thespecic temperature and chemical composition of the wastewatersdetermines the type and porosity of the lter to be applied. Further,the utilisation of membrane technology for dye removal fromtextile wastewater is very effective as reported by variousresearchers (Ledakowicz et al., 2001; Ahmad et al., 2002). However,the main drawbacks of membrane technology are the high cost,

    Table 2Characterisation of different class of dyes mainly used in textile industry and its me2009).

    Class Characteristics Substrate (bre)

    Acid Anionic, water soluble Nylon, wool, silkBasic Cationic, water soluble Modied nylon, polyesterDirect Anionic, water soluble Cotton, rayon, leather, nylon

    Disperse Very low water solubility Polyester, poly-amide, acetate,plastic, acrylic

    Reactive Anionic, water soluble Cotton, nylon, silk, wool

    Sulfur Colloidal, insoluble Cotton, rayon

    Vat Colloidal, insoluble Cotton, rayon

    A.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environ158frequent membrane fouling, requirement of different pretreat-ments depending upon the type of inuent wastewaters, andproduction of concentrated dyebath which further needs propertreatment before its safe disposal to the environment (Robinsonet al., 2001; Akbari et al., 2006). For membrane ltration, properpretreatment units for removing SS of the wastewaters are almostmandatory to increase the life time of the membranes. These makethe process more expensive and thereby limit the application ofthis expensive technology for wastewater treatment.

    Another most popular method is adsorption technology. Adsorp-tionmethod for colour removal is based on the afnity of various dyesforadsorbents. It is inuencedbyphysical andchemical factors suchasdyeeadsorbent interactions, surface area of adsorbent, particle size,temperature, pH and contact time (Anjaneyulu et al., 2005; Patel andVashi, 2010). Themain criteria for selectionof adsorbents are basedonthe characteristics like high afnity, capacity of target compound andpossibility of adsorbent regeneration (Karcher et al., 2002). Activatedcarbon ismost commonlyused adsorbent and canbe veryeffective formany dyes (Walker and Weatherly, 1997; Pala and Tokat, 2002).However, efciency is directly dependent upon the type of carbonmaterial used and wastewater characteristics (Robinson et al., 2001).The limitations of this technology are the eco-friendly disposal ofspent adsorbents, excessive maintenance costs, and pretreatment ofwastewater to reduce the SS under acceptable range before it is fedinto the adsorption column. Because of these reasons, eld scaleapplication of adsorption technology is limited not only for colourremoval of textile wastewaters but also for other water and waste-water treatment.

    Chemical methods mainly involve use of oxidising agents suchas ozone (O3), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and permanganate(MnO4) to change the chemical composition of compound or groupof compounds, e.g. dyes (Metcalf and Eddy, 2003). Among theseoxidants, ozone is widely used because of its high reactivity withdyes and good removal efciencies (Alaton et al., 2002). However, itis also been reported that ozone is not efcient in decolourisingnonsoluble disperse and vat dyes which react slowly and takelonger reaction time (Marmagne and Coste, 1996; Rajeswari, 2000).The decoulorisation efciency also depends upon the pH. As the pHdecreases, ozonation of hydrolysed dyes (Reactive Yellow 84)decreases (Rein, 2001; Konsowa, 2003). It has also been reportedthat the O3/UV as the more effective method for decolourising ofdyes compared to oxidation by UV or ozonation alone. However,

    of application (Easton, 1995; Akbari et al., 2002; Hees et al., 2002; Lau and Ismail,

    Dye-bre interaction Method of application

    Electrostatic, Hydrogen bonding Applied from neutral to acidic dyebathsElectrostatic attraction Applied from acidic dyebathsIntermolecular forces Applied from neutral or slightly

    alkaline baths containingadditional electrolytes

    Hydrophobic- Solid statemechanism

    Fine aqueous dispersions oftenapplied by high temperaturepressure or lower temperaturecarrier methods

    Covalent bonding Reactive site on dye reacts withfunctional group on bre to binddye covalently under inuence ofheat and pH(alkaline)

    Covalent bonding Aromatic substrate vatted with sodium sulde and re-oxidised toinsoluble sulfur-containingproducts on bre

    Impregnation and oxidation Water insoluble dyes solubilisedby reducing with sodium hydrosulte,then exhausted on bre and re-oxidised

    tal Management 93 (2012) 154e168Perkowski and Kos, (2003) have reported no signicant differencesbetween ozonation and O3/UV in terms of colour removal. This maybe due to the fact that production of hydroxyl radical (HO) duringphotodecomposition of ozone may improve the degradation oforganics. However, most of the UV light gets absorbed by the dyesand hence very small amount of hydroxyl free radical can beproduced to decompose the dyes. Therefore, approximately samecolour removal efciencies using O3 and O3/UV could be expected.

    In H2O2/UV process, HO radicals are formed when water con-taining H2O2 is exposed to UV light, normally in the range of200e280 nm (Metcalf and Eddy, 2003). The H2O2 photolysis occursas per the reaction shown in Equation (1).

    H2O2 UV l 200 280 nm/HO$ HO$ (1)This process is most widely used in Advanced Oxidation Process

    (AOP) technology for the decomposition of chromophores presentin the dyes (Ferroro, 2000; Kurbus et al., 2002) and consequentlyrelies complete decolourisation. Fenton reaction is also an exampleof AOP inwhich hydrogen peroxide is added in an acid solution (pH2e3) containing Fe2 ions (Equation (2)).

    Fe2 H2O2/Fe3 HO$HO (2)As compare to ozonation, this method is relatively cheap and

    also presents high COD reduction and decolourisation efciencies

  • menA.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environ(Van der Zee, 2002). The main drawback is high sludge generationdue to the occulation of reagents and dye molecules (Robinsonet al., 2001; Azbar et al., 2004). Most of the AOP for textile waste-waters are highly expensive and its effectiveness varies widely withthe type of constituents present in the textile wastewaters. Also,from the several reports it is observed that the in some cases, atcertain conditions, these technologies give very attractive results,however, in some other cases, their application has been reportednot worthy considering the cost and complexity involved in thesetechnologies.

    Chemical coagulation and occulation in wastewater treatmentinvolves the addition of chemicals to alter the physical state ofdissolved and suspended solids and facilitate their removal bysedimentation. In some cases the alteration is slight, and removal isaffected by entrapment within a voluminous coagulate consistingmostly the coagulant itself. Another result of chemical addition isa net increase in the dissolved constituents in the wastewater.Coagulation is used for removal of the waste materials in sus-pended or colloidal form that do not settle out on standing or maysettle by taking a very long time. Inwater treatment, coagulation aspretreatment is regarded as the most successful pretreatment(Huang et al., 2009; Leiknes, 2009).

    Coagulation of dye-containing wastewater has been used formany years as main treatment or pretreatment due to its lowcapital cost (Anjaneyulu et al., 2005; Golob et al., 2005). However,the major limitation of this process is the generation of sludge andineffective decolourisation of some soluble dyes (Anjaneyulu

    Fig. 3. Structure of various azo dyes showing chromophore and auxochrome (Van der Zee,Anthraquinone dye (Kim et al., 2004) and vat dye (Silvia et al., 2007).tal Management 93 (2012) 154e168 159et al., 2005; Hai et al., 2007). Further, the sludge production canbe minimised if only a small volume of highly coloured efuenttreated directly after the dyeing bath (Golob et al., 2005). Thereasons could be the non-availability of other chemical additivesexcept hydrolysing and xing agents in the efuent coming fromdyeing bath. The chemical additives that are normally present inthe textile wastewaters provide hindrance to the colour removal.If interfering chemical additives are absent in the textile waste-water except colour causing dyes, then less coagulant dosagemight be required which in turns will reduce the sludgeproduction.

    On account of this, coagulation of water soluble dyes ischallenging due to their high solubility. Further, due to devel-opment of synthesis technology, large number of innovativedyes with complex structures have been synthesised and still inprocess of synthesis, which provides difculties for the selectionof appropriate coagulant (Yu et al., 2002). In general colourremoval decreases with increase in dye concentration and dyesolubility (Bouyakoub et al., 2009; Zahrim et al., 2010). There-fore, re-evaluation of optimum conditions for coagulation ofdifferent types of dyes is necessary. Moreover, the effectivenessof the coagulation can be improved by appropriate selection ofcoagulant, occulant aids, optimization of process parameterssuch as pH, dosage of coagulant/occulant aids, mixing time,settling time, etc. The relative advantages and disadvantages ofdifferent physico-chemical methods have been summarisedin Table 3.

    2002; Yang and McGarrahan, 2005; Dos Santos et al., 2007; Riera-Torres et al., 2010),

  • .te,

    n

    e

    cale

    menOperating cost and time required for the desired degree oftreatment may be the major criteria for the selection of suitablemethod. It can be observed from the Table 3 that each and everymethod is associated with some type of limitations such as oza-nation gives good colour removal but not signicant COD reduction,also the expensive method. Good colour removal and COD reduc-tion can be achieved by using Fentons reagent but comparativelylonger treatment time and handling of iron contaminated sludge isthe major problem. Oxidation using H2O2-UV is not very effective

    Table 3Advantages and limitations of various methods of dye removal from textile efuents

    Physical/chemicalmethods

    Method description Advantages

    Ozonation Oxidation using ozone gas Application in gaseous stano alteration of volume

    Fenton reagents Oxidation using H2O2-Fe(II) Effective decolourisationof both soluble andinsoluble dyes

    Photochemical Oxidation using mainly H2O2-UV No sludge productionSonolysis Destruction of chemical bond by

    producing free radicalusing ultrasound

    No Extra sludge productio

    Adsorption Dye removal basedon solid support

    Excellent removal ofwide variety of dyes

    Membrane ltration Physical separation Removal of all types of dy

    Ion exchange Ion exchange resin Easy regeneration

    Electro-coagulation Treatment based onanode and cathode

    Good removal of dye

    Irradiation Treatment based on ionizing radiation

    Effective oxidation at lab s

    Biological Process Treatment based onmicrobiological degradation

    Environmental friendly

    Chemical coagulationand occulation

    Addition of coagulantsand occulants

    Economically feasible,excellent colour removal

    A.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environ160since colour and COD reduction is not very signicant, moreover itis not applicable to all types of dyes, produces large number of by-products and also suffers from UV light penetration limitation.Sonolysis gives good colour removal by the destruction of chemicalbond present in the dye structure with the help of free radicalproduction, however it requires enormous amount of dissolveoxygen and involves high electricity cost. Good removal of widevariety of dyes can be achieved by adsorption but regeneration isexpensive and it also necessitates costly disposal. Removal of alltypes of dyes may be achieved by selecting appropriate membranebut production of concentrated sludge and high cost of themembrane are again major limitations. Easy regeneration andefcient recovery of dyes may be possible in the ion exchangemethod but cost of regeneration is high and the method is notapplicable to all types of dyes since, ion exchange resins are dyespecic.

    Apart from these, various researchers have also proposed theenzymatic degradation of synthetic dyes. In this direction Bhuniaet al. (2001) investigated the application of novel enzymes horse-radish peroxidase for decomposition and precipitation of azo dyes.The degradation rate was dependent on the pH of the wastewater.In another study, Bumpus et al. (1991) revealed that the enzymefrom white rot fungus degraded Crystal Violet via N-demethylationin a considerable amount. Hence, after standardisation and facili-tation of accurate dosage, effective dye degradation performancecan be achieved. Simplicity in application and rapid modicationaccording to the character of dye to be removed makes it attractivechoice for decolourisation of textile wastewater. However, themajor limitation may be the denaturation of enzyme due the effectof temperature since wastewater coming out from the textileindustry is generally having high temperature.

    Both soluble and insoluble dyes can be effectively removed byelectro-coagulation process but high cost of electricity and gener-ation of secondary pollutants from chlorinated organics, heavymetals are themajor limitations. Complete decolourisationmay notbe achieved by the treatment with the help of irradiation for alltypes of dyes. Though, there is no sludge production in this tech-nology, but high cost of electricity may be the limitation. Cost

    Disadvantages References

    Short half-life (20 min),High cost

    Hao et al., 2000; Ince and Tezcanli, 2001;Robinson et al., 2001; Gogate and Pandi., 2004

    Sludge generation andits handling

    Hao et al., 2000; Arslan and Balcioglu, 2001;Meric et al., 2004

    Formation of by-products Konstantinou and Albanis, 2004; Hai et al., 2007Requires a lot of dissolvedoxygen, High cost

    Adewuyi, 2001; Arslan-Alaton, 2003

    Regeneration difculties,costly disposal of adsorbent

    Hao et al., 2000; Fu and Viraraghavan, 2001;Hai et al., 2007

    Production of concentratedsludge, High cost

    Marcucci et al., 2001;Barredo-Damas et al., 2006

    Not effective for all dyes Slokar and Marechal, 1998;Robinson et al., 2001; Hai et al., 2007

    High cost, less electrodereliability

    Chen et al., 2005; Merzouk et al., 2010;Phalakornkule et al., 2010

    Not effective for all dyes,High cost

    Robinson et al., 2001; Hai et al., 2007

    Slow Process, need of adequatenutrients, narrow operatingtemperature range

    Lin and Peng, 1996; Sandhya andSwaminathan, 2006; Togo et al., 2008

    Sludge production Hao et al., 2000; Fu and Viraraghavan,2001; Aboulhassan et al., 2006;Gao et al., 2007; Ciabatti et al., 2010

    tal Management 93 (2012) 154e168effectiveness of biological treatment process makes it attractivewhich can efciently remove most of the dyes used in the textileindustry because dyes generally possess high level of adsorption onto the activated sludge. However, longer duration of treatment,toxicity of dyes and its low biodegradability are the major limita-tions. Excellent colour removal may be achieved by coagulation-occulation which can remove most of the dyes used in thetextile industry. Though the sludge production is the major limi-tation in this process, cost effectiveness of the treatment ascompared to other methods makes it one of the attractive optionsfor treatment of textile wastewaters.

    Addition of some chemicals (polyelectrolyte) enhances coagu-lation by promoting the growth of large, rapid settling of ocs.Polyelectrolytes are high-molecular-weight polymers, whichcontain absorbable groups and when small dosages of poly-electrolyte (1 mg/L to 5 mg/L) are added in conjunction withcoagulant, these are also referred as coagulant aids. The poly-electrolyte is substantially unaffected by pH variations and serve asa coagulant itself by reducing the effective charge on colloids. Itproduces a large amount of ions in water and shows properties ofboth polymers and electrolytes. The most practical benet ofpolyelectrolyte is the formation of massive ocs. These massiveocs speed up the oc settling velocity, reduce the expense ofdecolourisation and also decrease the settled sludge volume(Bidhendi et al., 2007).

    Since Coagulation occulation is cost effective technology andgives excellent colour removal for wide variety of dyes, it becomespromising technology for decolourisation of textile wastewater.Sludge production can also be minimised by optimising process

  • parameters and suitable selection of coagulant and occulant. Dueto scarcity of landll sites, the disposal of sludge becomes moreproblematic and expensive. Therefore, recycle of sludge becomesthe only viable option. In this regard, the use of sludge as a buildingmaterial (Balasubramanian et al., 2006), a soil conditioner (Pearsonet al., 2004; Rosa et al., 2007; Islam et al., 2009) or as a fuel (Van derBruggen et al., 2005) has been studied by several researchers.

    Coagulation by means of biopolymers is very effective methodfor treatment of industrial wastewater. Chitosan as a bioocculantcan be successfully applied for the removal of both particulate anddissolved substances (Renault et al., 2009). The main reasons forthe success of this biopolymer in wastewater treatment usingcoagulation/occulation are, chitosan has the advantage of beinga non-toxic material, non corrosive and safe to handle (nonhazardous product, not irritating for skin and eyes) (Bolto andGregory, 2007; Bratby, 2007). Moreover, chitosan is also efcientin cold water and at much lower concentration than metal salts.The lower concentration of polymers reduces the volume of sludge

    more rapid occulation and strong ocs than that of alum atequivalent dosage. This can be attributed by the fact that thesecoagulants are pre-neutralised, have smaller effect on the pH ofwater and so reduce the need of pH correction. Most of the dyesused in textile industries are of negatively charged and hencecationic polymer is preferred over anionic and nonionic polymersdue to the better dye removal performance. However, the mecha-nisms of these products are not well established yet. Further, toconduct and evaluate the work, it is necessary to consider only themost critical controlling parameters. Various authors have sug-gested the most important parameters to be consider in coagula-tion are pH and concentration of applied metal ions (coagulant)such as alum (El-Gohary and Tawk, 2009), FeCl3 (Kim et al., 2003;Bidhendi et al., 2007), MgCl2 (Tan et al., 2000; Semerjian andAyoub, 2003; Gao et al., 2007), polyaluminium chloride (PACl)(Sanghi and Bhattacharya, 2005; Choo et al., 2007), lime (Mishraet al., 2002; Georgiou et al., 2003) and ferrous sulphate andorganic polymeric coagulants (Mishra et al., 2002; Bidhendi et al.,

    ulph

    lysinalts

    gula

    m

    fe

    ch

    oride

    m

    su

    A.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environmental Management 93 (2012) 154e168 161production compared to sludge obtained with alum. In addition, asbiopolymers are biodegradable, hence, the sludge can be efcientlydegraded by microorganisms. Various studies have been reportedthat the sludge produced from the treatment of milk processingplant wastewater (Chi and Cheng, 2006) and kaolinite suspensions(Divakaran and Pillai, 2001) was non-toxic and could be used tostimulate growth in plants.

    4. Chemical coagulation technologies

    Chemical coagulation is a complex phenomenon involvingvarious inter-related parameters, hence it is very critical to denethat how well coagulant will function under given conditions. Onthe basis of effectiveness to decolourise the textile wastewater,chemical coagulants can be categorised in the three parts asdescribed in the following Fig. 4.

    It has been reported that pre-hydrolysed metallic salts are oftenfound to be more effective than the hydrolysing metallic salts suchas aluminium sulphate (alum), ferric chloride and ferric sulphatethose are readily soluble in water (Jiang and Graham, 1998). Pre-hydrolysed coagulants such as Polyaluminium chloride (PACl),Polyaluminium ferric chloride (PAFCl), Polyferrous sulphate (PFS)and Polyferric chloride (PFCl) seem to give better colour removaleven at low temperature and may also produce lower volume ofsludge. In this connection, Gregory and Rossi (2001) have studiedthe effectiveness of various pre-hydrolysing coagulants for thetreatment of wastewater, and reported that PACl products give

    Polyaluminium

    Polyferric

    Polyferrous s

    (PAFCl)

    Ferric chloride

    Ferric sulphate

    Magnesium chloride

    Alum

    Hydrolysingmetallic salts

    Pre- hydrometallic s

    Chemical coa

    Polyaluminiu

    chl

    PolyaluminiuFig. 4. Categorisation of chemical coagula2007).Apart from these, mixing speed and time (Gurses et al., 2003),

    temperature and retention time (Ong et al., 2005; Naimabadi et al.,2009) also inuence the colour removal efciency. Hence, theoptimisation of these factors may signicantly increase the processefciency. Different coagulants affect different degrees of destabi-lisation. The higher the valence of the counter ion, the more is itsdestabilising effect and the less is the dose needed for coagulation.If pH is below the isoelectric point of metal hydroxide whileprecipitation of colloids by different coagulants supported bysuitable polymer, then the positively charged polymers will prevailand adsorption of these positively polymers can destabilise nega-tively charged colloids by charge neutralisation. Above theisoelectric point, anionic polymers will predominate where particledestabilization may take place through adsorption and bridgeformation. At high dose of metal ions (coagulant), a sufcientdegree of oversaturation occurs to produce a rapid precipitation ofa large quantity of metal hydroxide, enmeshing the colloidalparticles which are termed as sweep oc (Peavy et al., 1985). Forexample, when Fe(III) salts are used as coagulants, monomeric andpolymeric ferric species are formed, the formation of which ishighly pH dependent (Abo-Farha, 2010). Some of the reportedchemical coagulation technology and their performance have beensummarised in Table 4.

    The studies made by various researchers as described in theTable 4 show that the natural pH of ferric chloride solution is acidic.However, the effective colour removal can be achieved when the

    Aminomethyl polyacrylamide

    Polyalkylene

    Polyamine

    Polyethylenimine

    Polydiallyldimethyl ammonium

    chloride (poly-DADMAC)

    ate (PFS)

    g Synthetic cationic polymers

    nts

    rric chloride

    loride (PACl) (PFCl)

    lphate (PAS)nts according to their effectiveness.

  • pH is maintained near to neutral, but it again depends upon thetype of dyes to be removed (Kim et al., 2004; Guendy, 2010;Moghaddam et al., 2010). Hence, the addition of base to maintainthe pH becomes prime requirement. Lime or NaOH can be used forthis purpose. However, addition of lime may produce extra sludge.Whereas, addition of polyelectrolyte as a coagulant aid generallyimproves the performance of coagulant. It can be seen from theTable 4 that optimum pH for alum is near to neutral and hencehigher colour removal efciency can be obtained at this pH.Moreover, addition of polyelectrolyte generally improves the colourremoval performance. However, generation of large amount ofsludge associated with this process makes it unattractive.

    PACl products are aluminium-based coagulants. They are similarto alum, with several important differences:

    - Partially pre-neutralised (Higher basicity than alum)- Contains Cl instead of SO42

    - Contains up to three times the aluminium content- Rapid aggregation velocity, bigger and heavier ocs

    Moreover, PACl shows better colour removal efciency ina wider pH range of 7e10. The optimum pH for FeSO4 is alkaline inthe range 7e9 and gives higher colour removal at this pH range.Various researchers have also revealed that the addition of poly-electrolyte generally increases turbidity and volume of settledsludge. This undesired effect may be eliminated if the usedconcentration of polyelectrolyte is less than 2 mg/L (Bidhendi et al.,2007).

    The optimum pH for magnesium chloride varies between 9 and

    of basic efuent after treatment, may not be considered as the goodcoagulants. Though, both the ferric chloride and alum give roughlyhigh efciency, at low concentration, colour removal efciency isreported less for ferric chloride (Kim et al., 2004; Golob et al., 2005;Bidhendi et al., 2007). However, signicant improvement in thecolour removal has been reported if ferric chloride used with smallamount of cationic polymer (Suksaroj et al., 2005). Very limitedinformation is available based on the coagulant studies using PFS.PFS makes it attractive coagulant because it is practically soluble inwater, and forms large amount of polynucleic complex ions like(Fe2(OH)3)3, (Fe2(OH)2)2, (Fe8(OH)20)4, which are prone torender occulation. It is advantageous as regards the followingpoints:

    - Fast settling of ocs- Broad pH compatibility- Low iron contamination- High heavy metal removal rate- Easy dehydration of sludge etc.

    The principle mechanism for coagulation is similar to the PACli.e. adsorption and charge neutralisation. At high turbidity, thecoagulation may follow Sweep coagulation (Peavy et al., 1985).

    Gao et al. (2001) have investigated the application of PAFCl forthe decolourisation of petrochemical wastewater and reported thatPAFCl gives better turbidity removal in 7.0e8.4 pH range and goodcolour removal for suspension dyes over the other selected coag-ulant such as PFS and PACl. In addition to the performance of bettercoagulation efciency for colour removal, it also reects the ability

    lour

    30)

    )

    A.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environmental Management 93 (2012) 154e16816212 (Gao et al., 2007; El-Gohary and Tawk, 2009). It gives very goodcolour removal performance if used with lime. However, it gener-ates large amount of sludge which may cause sludge disposalproblem and also involves extra cost. Alum and magnesium chlo-ride, because of large amount of sludge generation and production

    Table 4Effectiveness of different chemical coagulants studied by different researchers for co

    Name of coagulant Optimiseddose (mg/L)

    Coagulant aids (if any)

    Steel industry wastewaterPotassium ferrate 100 Polyamine based polymerPolyaluminium Chloride (PACl) 10Poly-epichlorohydrin-diamine 20Alum 200 Polyacrylamide

    based polymer (Cytec)Alum 5000 Copper sulphate as catalystAlum 20 Commercial cationic

    occulant (Coloc-RDeCiba)Alum 7 104Ferrous Sulphate 200 PolyelectrolyteFerric chloride 400Ferric chloride 293

    Ferric chloride 56 Cationic polymerMagnesium chloride 400 Polyelectrolyte (Koaret PA 32Magnesium chloride 120 LimeMagnesium chloride 800 Hydrated lime

    Polyaluminium chloride (PACl) 0.1 Poly acrylamide-seed gum

    Polyaluminium chloride (PACl) 800 Anionic polyacrlamide,Exeroc 204

    Ferrous sulphate 400 Lime and Cationic polymerFerrous sulphate 1000 Anionic

    polyelectrolyte (Henkel23500Ferrous sulphate 7 104Ferric sulphate 7 104

    a Experiments were carried out at original pH of raw wastewater.to quick formation of the ocs. The ability of quick formation of theocs and superior colour removal efciency may be due to thereason that PAFCl combines the coagulatory advantages of bothaluminium and iron salts and hence able to form ocs rapidly withmore bulky and rapid sedimentation. This novel coagulant is not

    removal of textile wastewater.

    Type of dyespresent

    OptimumpH

    % Colourremoval

    Reference

    Disperse 4.25 99 Anouzla et al., 20096.5e8.5 95 Ciabatti et al., 20107.2 99.9 Choo et al., 20077 95 Kang et al., 20075.3 78.9 El-Gohary and Tawk, 2009

    4 74 Kumar et al., 2008Reactiveand acid

    Near toneutral

    98 Golob et al., 2005

    5.7e6.5a 74 Patel and Vashi, 2010Sulfur 9.4 90 Bidhendi et al., 2007Sulfur 8.3 100 Bidhendi et al., 2007Reactive anddisperse

    6 71 Kim et al., 2004

    4 92 Suksaroj et al., 2005Reactive 11 85 Tan et al., 2000

    11 100 El-Gohary and Tawk, 2009Reactive anddisperse

    12 98 Gao et al., 2007

    Reactive,acid and direct

    8.5 80 Sanghi et al., 2006

    7.5 75 Tun et al., 2007

    Reactive 12.5 90 Georgiou et al., 20039.5 60 Selcuk, 2005

    5.7e6.5a 85 Patel and Vashi, 20105.7e6.5a 58 Patel and Vashi, 2010

  • al ba

    coa

    al co

    menwidely studied for textile wastewater treatment hence very limitedinformation is available. The principle mechanism of PAFCl ischarge neutralisation and bridging (Chen et al., 2010). Recently,Ciabatti et al. (2010) have studied the use of potassium ferrate incombination of polyamine based polymer for treatment of dyeingefuents and found excellent colour removal as well as CODreduction. Since ferrate (VI) ion is a strong oxidant in entire the pHrange, hence after reduction to Fe(III) ion or ferric hydroxide duringoxidation process, it possesses the ability to act as coagulant. Hencepotassium ferrate represents a unique dual function (Oxidant andcoagulant) chemical reagent that can be an effective alternative tocurrent approaches for water and wastewater treatment.

    5. Coagulation with the help of natural coagulants

    Chemical coagulation with the help of above discussed coag-

    AnimPlant based

    Natural

    Guar gum

    Gum Arabic

    Seed extract from

    Strychnos potatorum, Moringa Oilifeira etc.

    Cactus latifaria extract Potato starch

    Chitosan

    Fig. 5. Categorisation of natur

    A.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environulants may be the method of choice for decolourisation of textilewastewater before being fed to the biological treatment, ifnecessary. However, it has also some drawbacks as the efciencyof the treatment strongly depends on pH. Moreover, the coagu-lation process is not always efcient enough because at differentenvironmental conditions such as at extreme pH and at very lowor very high temperature, it may produce very sensitive, fragileocs, which result in poor sedimentation. These ocs may ruptureunder any type of physical forces. To improve the efciency ofcoagulation process, number of high molecular weightcompounds such as polymers from synthetic or natural originmay be recommended. These polymers can function as coagulantitself or in the form of coagulant aids/bioocculants, dependingupon the wastewater and polymer characteristics. These polymersare normally macro-molecular structure with variety of functionalgroups which can either work as coagulants by destabilising thecharged stable particles mainly through the process of adsorptionand neutralisation or can work as coagulant aids by attaching thedestabilised particles with the functional groups by interparticlebridging. Here organic polymeric compounds are advantageousover inorganic materials, which posses several novel characteris-tics such as their ability to produce large, dense, compact ocsthat are stronger and have good settling characteristics (Renaultet al., 2009). In contrast to some traditionally used coagulantsuch as alum, organic polymers are benecial because of thelower coagulant dosage requirement, efciency at low tempera-ture and produce small volume of sludge whereas inorganicpolymers and chemical coagulants generally involve higher cost,less biodegradability and toxicity. For example, acrylamide is verymuch toxic and gives severe neurotoxic effects (Bratby, 2007).Toxicity effect due to cationic polymers to the plants has beenestablished long back (Gao et al., 2001). In this connection, Boltoand Gregory (2007) also reported that anionic and nonionicpolymers are generally less toxic as compared to cationic poly-mers especially to aquatic organisms. The major advantage ofnatural polymer is its non-toxicity to the environment andbiodegradability. Therefore, the efuent after natural polymertreatment can be treated by biological means, if required. Thisefuent will not pose any harm to the biological organisms, as isoffered, if it is treated by means of synthetic coagulants. Not onlythis, the sludge generated by the natural polymers can further be

    Micro-organism basedsed

    gulants

    Xanthan gum

    agulants with their examples.

    tal Management 93 (2012) 154e168 163treated biologically or can be disposed off safely as soil condi-tioners because of their non-toxicity. Hence, there is an urgentneed to establish the use of natural low cost polymers for textilewastewater treatment.

    In the view of this, many researchers have studied the effec-tiveness of various natural coagulants (Joshi and Nanoti, 1999)extracted from plants or animals (Christman, 1967) for the treat-ment of textile wastewater. These natural coagulants may alsoprove their effectiveness if used as coagulant aids along with thechemical coagulants. Most of the natural coagulants fall under thecategory of polysaccharides, hence also termed as polymericcoagulants. On the basis of the origin of production, natural coag-ulant can be divided in to three categories as shown in Fig. 5. Unlikesynthetic coagulants, natural coagulants generally exhibit twotypes of mechanism namely i) adsorption and charge neutralisa-tion, and ii) adsorption and interparticle bridging. As their molec-ular weight is high and contain long chained structure, thereforeoffers a large number of available adsorption sites. Adsorption andcharge neutralisation refers to the sorption of two oppositelycharged ions, while interparticle bridging occurs when poly-saccharide chain of coagulant sorbs the particulates (Miller et al.,2008). The existence of adsorption and interparticle bridgingbetween dye molecules and polysaccharides is due to the interac-tion of p- electron system of dyes and OH group of poly-saccharides (Fig. 6), which was rst suggested by Yoshida et al.

  • established. Although the mechanism of coagulation with natural

    experimental results showed that, carboxymethyl chitosan inwastewater decolourisation and COD reduction, are superior overother commonly used polymer occulants. Szygula et al. (2009)reported approximately 99% colour removal from the simulatedtextile wastewater containing Acid Blue 92 at an optimum chitosandosage of 100 mg/L maintaining optimum pH of 9. In continuationof this, Mahmoodi et al. (2011) investigated the effectiveness of

    mencoagulants has not been extensively investigated but the presenceof hydroxyl groups along the polysaccharide chain provides a large(1964) and then reviewed by Blackburn and Burkinshaw (2002)and Yin (2010).

    5.1. Plant based polymers as coagulants

    Various plant extracted polymers such as starch, guar gam, gumarabic, nirmali seeds, tannin, Moringa oleifera and cactus etc. aregenerally well known as coagulants within the scientic commu-nity. These polymers have large number of industrial application asthese are polysaccharides and possess various commercial appli-cations such as in paper industry, as food additives etc. By virtue ofthe effectiveness of natural polymer as coagulant, Sanghi et al.(2006) have investigated the use of Ipomeoa dasysperma seedgum and guar gum as coagulant aids alongwith PACl and found 86%and 87% removal of acid dye at the PACl dosage of 1 mg/L andI. dasysperma seed gum and guar gum dosage of 5 mg/L each, atoptimum pH of 9.5. Signicant removals of the order 73% and 80%were also been reported for direct dye at the same dosage ofcoagulant and coagulant aid and at the same pH of 9.5.

    Adinol et al. (1994) have reported that polysaccharide extrac-ted from Strychnos potatorum (Nirmali) seeds can effectively reduceupto 80% turbidity of kaolin solution. M. oleifera, known as drum-stick tree is widely found throughout India, Asia, some parts ofAfrica and America. The trees bark, root, fruit, owers, leaves seedsand gum are also used as medicines. The seed of these trees is alsoused as coagulant and/or occulants in the water and wastewatertreatment. Beltrn-Heredia et al. (2009) have investigated the useofM. oleifera seed extract for the removal of anthraquinone dye andreported 95% dye removal at the coagulant dose of 100 mg/L and atpH 7. Further, Lea (2010) has investigated the effectiveness of M.oleifera seed extract for the treatment of turbid water and found99.5% turbidity removal at the dosage of 400 mg/L. Typically,increased dosage of seed extract does not enhance the dye removalafter maximum adsorption is reached. It might be due to the factthat no more new sites for adsorption remain available at thesurface of seed extract. M. oleifera seeds are also considered as anexcellent biofuel source for making biodiesel.

    Gum Arabic, also known as Gum Acacia is highly branched withbeta-Galactose backbone having high molecular weight of250,000e750,000 Da, water and fat soluble polysaccharide. Thecoagulation studies with this novel natural coagulant are yet to be

    Fig. 6. Schematic representation of intermolecular interaction between p- electronfrom dye molecule and hydroxyl group of polysaccharide (Yoshida et al., 1964).

    A.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environ164number of available adsorption sites that might lead to the inter-particle bridging between polysaccharide and dye molecule asshown in Fig. 7.

    Paulino et al. (2006) studied the removal of methylene blue withthe help of hydrogel formed by modied Gum Arabic, polyacrylateand polyacrylamide and reported that 98% of dye removal can beachieved at pH 8 with maximum adsorption capacity of 48 mg ofthe dye per gram of hydrogel. However, use of gum arabic and guargum for colour removal due to the widely used dyes in the textileindustries are yet to be established. In connection with applicationof natural coagulants, various researchers (Kumar, 2000; No andMeyers, 2000; Kurita, 2006; Renault et al., 2009) have studied theeffectiveness of animal extracted polymer as coagulants forindustrial wastewater treatment.

    5.2. Animal based polymers as coagulants

    Chitosan is a linear copolymer of D-glucosamine (deacetylatedunit) and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (acetylated unit) produced bythe deacetylation of chitin, a natural polymer of major importance(Roberts, 1992; Kurita, 2006). The degree of deacetylation can bedetermined by NMR spectroscopy. Chitin is the structural elementin the exoskeleton of crustaceans (crabs, shrimps etc.) and in theendoskeleton of other invertebrate.

    Chitosan possesses several intrinsic properties such as non-toxicity, its biodegradability and its outstanding chelationbehavior that make it an effective coagulant and/or occulant forremoval of contaminant in the dissolved state. Various studies fortreatment of industrial wastewater using chitosan have beencarried out during late 70s by Bough and coworkers (Bough, 1975,1976; Bough et al., 1978). They have investigated the effectivenessof chitosan for coagulation and recovery of suspended solids (SS) inprocessing of waste from variety of food processing industries andfound that this novel coagulant is very much effective for efcientreduction of COD as well as removal of SS and turbidity. Numerousworks claim that chitosan involved in a dual mechanism includingcoagulation by charge neutralisation and occulation by bridgingmechanism (No and Meyers, 2000; Guibal and Roussy, 2007). Thepossible interactions between dye molecules and chitosan havebeen shown in Fig. 8. Zhang et al. (1995) have used carboxymethylchitosan for printing and dyeing wastewater treatment. The

    Fig. 7. Schematic representation of the interaction of dye molecule with (a) Guar Gumand (b) Gum Arabic.

    tal Management 93 (2012) 154e168chitosan for removal of Acid Green 25 and Direct Red 23 and re-ported approximately 75% and 95% dye removal respectively in10 min at optimum pH 2maintaining the stirring speed of 200 rpm.

    5.3. Microorganism based polymer as coagulant

    Xanthan gum is a polysaccharide, derived from the bacterialcoat of Xanthomonas campestris, used as food additive and rheologymodier (Davidson, 1980). It is produced by the fermentation ofglucose by the X. campestris bacterium. After fermentation, thepolysaccharide is separated from the growthmediumwith the help

  • of solvent separation technique, dried and ground into a nepowder (Cohan, 2010). The use of xanthan gum for the treatment of

    Fig. 8. Schematic representation of the formation of chitosan from

    A.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environmentextile wastewater is not been reported in the literature yet. Due tocomplex structure and higher molecular weight of xanthan gum(250,000e750,000 Da), as compared to guar gum (about220,000e250,000 Da), it may also be considered as one of thepromising coagulant and/or coagulant aids for the treatment oftextile wastewater. Hence, extensive study is required to be con-ducted to establish the various facts about effectiveness of xanthangum for the treatment of textile wastewater. The possible mecha-nism of coagulation by interparticle bridging as observed for guargum can also be observed for xanthan gum (Fig. 9).

    It can be summarised from the above discussions that plantextracted coagulant may be encouraged over animal extractedcoagulant for the treatment of textile wastewater due to the factthat non plant sources possess limited potential for the massproduction as compared to the plant sources. Extra involvement ofFig. 9. Schematic representation of possible interaction between xanthan gum and dyemolecule.ourisation of the waste stream due to the removal of dye moleculesfrom the dyebath efuents, and not due to a partial decompositionof dyes, which can lead to an even more potentially harmful andtoxic aromatic compound. The major disadvantage of coagulation/occulation processes is the production of sludge. However, thesludge amount could be minimised if only a low volume of thehighly coloured dyebath could be eliminated by chemical treat-ment directly after the dyeing process (Golob et al., 2005).

    6. Future scope of research

    Very limitedwork has been carried out on the decolourisation oftextile wastewater containing multiple dyes of different classesalong with the various chemical additives which are used duringcost in the processing of microorganism based coagulant may notbe an attractive option. Application of plant based coagulants willbecome more attractive if the coagulants producing plants areindigenous.

    The main advantage of coagulation and occulation is decol-

    chitin polysaccharide and its interaction with dye molecules.tal Management 93 (2012) 154e168 165textile processing. Also the effectiveness of most of the pre-hydrolysed coagulants for decolourisation of textile wastewatercontaining multiple dyes is yet to be established. Considering theindustries dependencies on the cost effective chemical coagulationand occulation technologies for their coloured wastewater treat-ment, it is required to conduct more and more future research tocome up with best coagulants or combinations of coagulants alongwith coagulant aids which can produce very promising results evenat a wider variations of pH and other interfering agents of thetextile wastewaters. Investigation of the effectiveness of morenumber of natural coagulants is also need to be assessed. Thisassessment may be carried out using natural polymers as coagulantaids as well as coagulant itself. Effectiveness of natural coagulantsalso required to be carried out against simulated as well as rawtextile wastewater.

    7. Conclusion

    All decolourisation methods described in this review have someadvantages as well as some drawbacks, and their selection willmostly governed by the textile wastewater characteristics like classand concentration of dyes, pH, organic contents, heavy metals, etc.Among different physical, chemical, biological, and advanced

  • Abo-Farha, S.A., 2010. Comparative study of oxidation of some azo dyes by different

    Ahmad, A.L., Harris, W.A., SyaieOoi, B.S., 2002. Removal of dye from wastewater of

    mentextile industry using membrane technology. Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaJurnal Teknologi 36 (F), 31e44.

    Akbari, A., Desclaux, S., Rouch, J.C., Aptel, P., Remigy, J.C., 2006. New UV-photografted nanoltration membranes for the treatment of colored textiledye efuents. Journal of Membrane Science 286, 342e350.

    Akbari, A., Remigy, J.C., Aptel, P., 2002. Treatment of textile dye efuent usinga polyamide-based nanoltration membrane. Chemical Engineering Protocols41, 601e609.

    Al-Malack, M.H., Abuzaid, N.S., El-Mubarak, A.H., 1999. Coagulation of polymericwastewater discharged by a chemical factory. Water Research 33, 521e529.

    Alaton, I.A., Balcioglu, I.A., Bahnemann, D.W., 2002. Advanced oxidation of a reactivedye bath efuent: comparison of O3, H2O2/UV-C and TiO2/UV-A processes.Water Research 36, 1143e1154.

    Anjaneyulu, Y., Chary, N.S., Raj, D.S.S., 2005. Decolourization of industrial efuents-available methods and emerging technologies-a review. Reviews in Environ-mental Science and Biotechnology 4, 245e273.

    Anliker, R., 1986. In: Richardson, M. (Ed.), Toxic hazard assessment of chemicals. TheRoyal Society of Chemistry, London.

    Anouzla, A., Abrouki, Y., Souabi, S., Sa, M., Rhbal, H., 2009. Colour and COD removalof disperse dye solution by a novel coagulant: application of statistical designfor the optimization and regression analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials166 (2e3), 1302e1306.

    Arslan, I., Balcioglu, A., 2001. Degradation of Remazol Black B dye and its simulateddyebath wastewater by advancedoxidation processes in heterogenous andhomogeneous media. Coloration Technology 117, 38e42.

    Arslan-Alaton, I., 2003. A review of the effects of dye-assisting chemicals onadvanced oxidation of reactive dyes in wastewater. Coloration Technology 119,345e353.advanced oxidation processes: fenton, fenton-like, photo-fenton and photo-Fenton-Like. Journal of American Science 6 (10), 128e142.

    Aboulhassan, M.A., Souabi, S., Yaacoubi, A., Baudu, M., 2006. Improvement of paintefuents coagulation using natural and synthetic coagulant aids. Journal ofHazardous Materials B138, 40e45.

    Adewuyi, Y.G., 2001. Sonochemistry: environmental science and engineeringapplications. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 40, 4681e4715.

    Adinol, M., Corsaro, M.M., Lanzetta, R., Parrilli, M., Folkard, G., Grant, W.,Sutherland, J., 1994. Composition of the coagulant polysaccharide fraction fromStrychnos potatorum seeds. Carbohydrate Research 263, 103e110.chemical oxidation technologies, chemical coagulation and oc-culation is still a cost-comparative alternative for the treatment ofindustrial textile wastewaters and is widely practiced by the smallto large scale industries. Among chemical coagulation and occu-lation technologies, comparatively, pre-hydrolysed coagulants suchas PACl, PFCl, PFS and PAFCl may be considered as the bettercoagulants because of their superior colour removal even at smalldosage and affectivity at wider pH range of wastewater. Ferroussulfate may also be considered as a better coagulant over otherhydrolysing metallic salts. Additionally, due to some novel prop-erties of natural coagulants such as non-toxic, biodegradability,environment friendly, ability to encapsulate etc., these may also beconsidered as the promising coagulants as well as coagulant aidsfor textile wastewater treatment specially at rst stage, which willnot hinder the biological treatment (if required) because theresidual coagulant may act as nutrient for the microorganisms.However, till date the applicability of these natural coagulants forthe textile wastewater is very limited. More and more studiesrequired to evaluate their application for colour removal of textilewastewaters particularly, their behaviour at high pH of textilewastewaters.

    Acknowledgement

    The authors wish to thank all the reviewers for their valuablesuggestions for improving the quality of the manuscript andDepartment of Civil Engineering, School of Infrastructure, IndianInstitute of Technology Bhubaneswar, India, for providing facilitiesfor carrying out research work in the related area.

    References

    A.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environ166ATMI, 1997. American Textiles Manufacturers Institute, Comments on draft of thisdocument.Azbar, N., Yonar, T., Kestioglu, K., 2004. Comparison of various advanced oxidationprocesses and chemical treatment methods for COD and colour removal froma polyester and acetate ber dying efuent. Chemosphere 55, 35e43.

    Babu, B.R., Parande, A.K., Raghu, S., Kumar, T.P., 2007. Cotton textile processing:waste generation and efuent treatment. Textile technology. The Journal ofCotton Science 11, 141e153.

    Balasubramanian, J., Sabumon, P.C., Lazar, J.U., Ilangovan, R., 2006. Reuse of textileefuent treatment plant sludge in building materials. Waste Management 26,22e28.

    Barredo-Damas, S., Alcaina-Miranda, M.I., Iborra-Clar, M.I., Bes-Pi, A.,Mendoza, J.A., Iborra-Clar, A., 2006. Study of the UF process as pretreatment ofNF membranas for textile wastewater reuse. Desalination 200, 745e747.

    Bayramoglu, G., Arica, M.Y., 2007. Biosorption of benzidine based textile dyes DirectBlue 1 and Direct Red 128 using native and heat-treated biomass of Trametesversicolor. Journal of Hazardous Materials 143 (1e2), 135e143.

    Bayramoglu, M., Kobya, M., Can, O.T., Sozbir, M., 2004. Operating cost analysis ofelectrocoagulation of textile dye wastewater. Separation and PuricationTechnology 37, 117e125.

    Beltrn-Heredia, J., Snchez-Martn, J., Delgado-Regalado, A., Jurado-Bustos, C.,2009. Removal of Alizarin Violet 3R (anthraquinonic dye) from aqueous solu-tions by natural coagulants. Journal of Hazardous Materials 170, 43e50.

    Bhunia, A., Durani, S., Wangikar, P.P., 2001. Horseradish peroxidase catalyseddegradation of industrially important dyes. Biotechnology and Bioengineering72, 562e567.

    Bidhendi, GR.N., Torabian, A., Ehsani, H., Razmkhah, N., 2007. Evaluation of indus-trial dyeing wastewater treatment with coagulants and polyelectrolyte asa coagulant aid. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health, Science and Engi-neering 4, 29e36.

    Bisschops, I.A.E., Spanjers, H., 2003. Literature review on textile wastewater char-acterisation. Environmental Technology 24, 1399e1411.

    Blackburn, R.S., Burkinshaw, S.M., 2002. A greener approach to cotton dyeing, Part2: application of 1:2 metal complex acid dyes. Green Chemistry 4, 261e265.

    Bolto, B., Gregory, J., 2007. Organic polyelectrolytes in water treatment. WaterResearch 41, 2301e2324.

    Bough, W.A., 1975. Coagulation with Chitosan-an aid to recovery of by productsfrom egg breaking wastes. Poultry Science 54, 1904e1912.

    Bough, W.A., 1976. Chitosan-a polymer from seafood wastes for use in treatment offood processing wastes and activated sludge. Process Biochemistry 11, 13e16.

    Bough, W.A., Salter, W.L., Wu, A.C.M., Perkins, B.E., 1978. Inuence of manufacturingvariables on the characteristics and effectiveness of chitosan products.Biotechnology and Bioengineering 20, 1931e1943.

    Bouyakoub, A.Z., Kacha, S., Lartiges, B.S., Bellebia, S., Derriche, Z., 2009. Treatment ofreactive dye solutions by physicochemical combined process. Desalination andWater Treatment 12 (1e3), 202e209.

    Bratby, J., 2007. Coagulation and Flocculation in Water and Wastewater Treatment,second ed.. IWA Publishing.

    Bumpus, J.A., Mileski, G., Brock, B., Ashbaugh, W., Aust, S.D., 1991. Biologicaloxidations of organic compounds by enzymes from a white rot fungus. Inno-vative Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies 3, 47e54.

    Charoenlarp, K., Choyphan, W., 2009. Reuse of dye wastewater through colourremoval with electrocoagulation process. Asian Journal on Energy and Envi-ronment 10 (4), 250e260.

    Chen, X., Shen, Z., Zhu, X., Fan, Y., Wang, W., 2005. Advanced treatment of textilewastewater for reuse using electrochemical oxidation and membrane ltration.Water South Africa 31, 127e132.

    Chen, T., Gao, B., Yue, Q., 2010. Effect of dosing method and pH on color removalperformance and oc aggregation of polyferricchloride-polyaminedual-coagulant in synthetic dyeing wastewater treatment. Colloids and Surface A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 355, 121e129.

    Chi, F.H., Cheng, W.P., 2006. Use of chitosan as coagulant to treatwastewater frommilk processing plant. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 14, 411e417.

    Choo, K.H., Choi, S.J., Hwang, E.D., 2007. Effect of coagulant types on textilewastewater reclamation in a combined coagulation/ultraltration system.Desalination 202, 262e270.

    Christie, R., 2001. Colour Chemistry. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge,United Kingdom.

    Christman, R.F., 1967. Report for Kypro Co. Bellvina, Washington.Ciabatti, I., Tognotti, F., Lombardi, L., 2010. Treatment and reuse of dyeing efuents

    by potassium ferrate. Desalination 250, 222e228.Cohan, Wendy, 2010. Could xanthan gum Sensitivity be Complicating your Celiac

    disease Recovery?. www.celiac.com.COINDS, 2000. Comprehensive Industry Documents Series on Textile Industry.

    Central Pollution Control Board, India. 59.Davidson, L.R., 1980. Handbook of Water Soluble Gums and Resins. McGraw Hill,

    NewYork.Debik, E., Kaykioglu, G., Coban, A., Koyuncu, I., 2010. Reuse of anaerobically and

    aerobically pre-treated textile wastewater by UF and NF membranes. Desali-nation 256, 174e180.

    Divakaran, R., Pillai, V.N.S., 2001. Flocculation of kaolinite suspensions in water bychitosan. Water Research 35, 3904e3908.

    Dos Santos, A.B., Cervantes, F.J., Van Lier, J.B., 2007. Review paper on current tech-nologies for decolourisation of textile wastewaters: perspectives for anaerobicbiotechnology. Bioresource Technology 98, 2369e2385.

    tal Management 93 (2012) 154e168Easton, J.R., 1995. The dye makers view. In: Cooper, P. (Ed.), Colour in DyehouseEfuent. Society of Dyehouse and Colour, Bradford, England, pp. 9e21.

  • menEl-Gohary, F., Tawk, A., 2009. Decolourisation and COD reduction of disperse andreactive dyes wastewater using chemical-coagulation followed by sequentialbatch reactor (SBR) process. Desalination 249, 1159e1164.

    Ferroro, F., 2000. Oxidative degradation of dyes and surfactant in the Fenton andphoto-Fenton treatment of dye house efuents. Coloration Technology 116(5e6), 148e153.

    Fersi, C., Dhahbi, M., 2008. Treatment of textile plant efuent by ultraltration and/or nanoltration for water reuse. Desalination 222, 263e271.

    Fontenot, E.J., Lee, Y.H., Matthews, R.D., Zhu, G., Pavlostathis, S.G., 2003. Reductivedecolorisation of a textile reactive dyebath under methanogenic conditions.Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 109, 207e225.

    Foo, K.Y., Hameed, B.H., 2010. Decontamination of textile wastewater via TiO2/activated carbon composite materials. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science159, 130e143.

    Fu, Y., Viraraghavan, T., 2001. Fungal Decolorization of dye wastewaters: a review.Bioresource Technology 79, 251e262.

    Gao, B., Yue, Q., Miao, J., 2001. Evaluation of polyaluminium ferric chloride (PAFC) asa composite coagulant for water and wastewater treatment. Water Science andTechnology 47 (1), 127e132.

    Gao, B.Y., Yue, Q.Y., Wang, Y., Zhou, W.Z., 2007. Color removal from dye-containingwastewater by magnesium chloride. Journal of Environmental Management 82,167e172.

    Georgiou, D., Melidis, P., Aivasidis, A., Gimouhopoulos, K., 2002. Degradation of azo-reactive dyes by ultraviolet radiation in the presence of hydrogen peroxide.Dyes and Pigments 52, 69e78.

    Georgiou, D., Aivazidis, A., Hatiras, J., Gimouhopoulos, K., 2003. Treatment of cottontextile wastewater using lime and ferrous sulfate. Water Research 37,2248e2250.

    Gholami, M., Nasseri, S., Fard, M.R.A., Mesdaghinia, A., Vaezi, F., Mahvi, A.,Naddaf, K., 2001. Dye removal from efuents of textile industries by ISO9888method and membrane technology. Iranian Journal of Public Health 30, 73e80.

    Gogate, P.R., Pandi, A.B., 2004. A review of imperative technologies for wastewatertreatment: hybrid methods. Advances in Environmental Research 8, 553e597.

    Golob, V., Vinder, A., Simonic, M., 2005. Efciency of coagulation/occulationmethod for treatment of dye bath efuents. Dyes and Pigments 67, 93e97.

    Gozlvez-Zafrilla, J.M., Sanz-Escribano, D., Lora-Garca, J., Len Hidalgo, M.C., 2008.Nanoltration of secondary efuent for wastewater reuse in the textileindustry. Desalination 222, 272e279.

    Gregory, J., Rossi, L., 2001. Dynamic testing of water treatment coagulants. WaterScience and Technology, Water Supply 1 (4), 65e72.

    Guendy, H.R., 2010. Treatment and reuse of wastewater in the textile industry bymeans of coagulation and adsorption techniques. Journal of Applied SciencesResearch 6 (8), 964e972.

    Guibal, E., Roussy, J., 2007. Coagulation and occulation of dye containing solutionsusing a biopolymer (chitosan). Reactive and Functional Polymers 67, 33e42.

    Gupta, V.K., Suhas, 2009. Application of low-cost adsorbents for dye removal-a review. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 2313e2342.

    Gurses, A., Yolcin, M., Dogar, D., 2003. Removal of remazol red RB by using Al (III) ascoagulant- occulant; effect of some variables on settling velocity. Water, Airand Soil Pollution 146 (1e4), 297e318.

    Hai, F.I., Yamamoto, K., Fukushi, K., 2007. Hybrid treatment systems for dyewastewater. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 37,315e377.

    Hao, O.J., Kim, H., Chiang, P.C., 2000. Decolorisation of wastewater. Critical Reviewsin Environmental Science and Technology 30, 449e505.

    Haroun, M., Idris, A., 2009. Treatment of textile wastewater with an anaerobicuidized bed reactor. Desalination 237, 357e366.

    Hees, U., Freche, M., Kluge, M., Provost, J., Weiser, J., 2002. Developments in textileink jet printing with pigment inks. In: Image Science and Technology NIP 18Digital Printing Conference, San Diego, pp. 242e245.

    Hsu, T.C., Chiang, C.S., 1997. Activated sludge treatment of dispersed dyefactory wastewater. Journal of Environmental Science and Health 32,1921e1932.

    Huang, H., Schwab, K., Jacangelo, J.G., 2009. Pretreatment for low pressuremembranes in water treatment: a review. Environmental Science and Tech-nology 43, 3011e3019.

    Husain, Q., 2006. Potential applications of the oxidoreductive enzymes in thedecolorization and detoxication of textile and other synthetic dyes frompolluted water: a review. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 26, 201e221.

    Ince, N.H., Tezcanli, G., 2001. Reactive dyestuff degradation by combined sonolysisand ozanation. Dyes and Pigments 49, 145e153.

    Islam, M.M., Halim, M.A., Islam, M.S., Islam, M.S., Biswas, C.K., 2009. Analysis theplant nutrients and organic matter in textile sludge in Gazipur, Bangladesh.Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2 (1), 63e67.

    ISPCH, 1995. Industrial Safety and Pollution Control Handbook. 2nd reprint, seconded. A joint publication of National Safety Council and Associate (Data)Publishers Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, pp. 451e466.

    Jadhav, J.P., Parshetti, G.K., Kalme, S.D., Govindwar, S.P., 2007. Decolourization of azodye methyl red by Saccharomyces cerevisiae MTCC 463. Chemosphere 68,394e400.

    Jekel, M., 1997. Wastewater Treatment in the Textile Industry. In: Treatment ofWastewaters from Textile Processing. TU Berlin. Schriftenreihe BiologischeAbwasserreiigung des Sfb 193, Berlin, pp. 15e24.

    A.K. Verma et al. / Journal of EnvironJiang, J.Q., Graham, N.J.D., 1998. Pre-polymerised inorganic coagulants and phos-phorus removal by coagulation-a review. Water SA 24, 237e244.Joo, D.J., Shin, W.S., Choi, J.H., Choi, S.J., Kim, M.C., Han, M.H., Ha, T.W., Kim, Y.H.,2007. Decolorization of reactive dyes using inorganic coagulants and syntheticpolymer. Dyes and Pigments 73, 59e64.

    Joseph, E.I., 2007. Wastewater treatment in the textile industry. Pakistan TextileJournal, 60e66.

    Joshi, V.A., Nanoti, M.V., 1999. Laboratory studies on Tarota as coagulant aid in watertreatment. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection 19 (6), 451e455.

    Kang, S.F., Chen, M.C., 1997. Coagulation of textile secondary efuents with fentonsreagent. Water Science and Technology 36 (12), 215e222.

    Kang, Q., Gao, B., Yue, Q., Zhou, W., Shen, D., 2007. Residual color proles of reactivedyes mixture during a chemical occulation process. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspect 299, 45e53.

    Karcher, S., Kornmuller, A., Jekel, M., 2002. Anion exchange resins for removal ofreactive dyes from textile wastewaters. Water Research 36, 4717e4724.

    Khaled, A., El-Nemr, A., El-Sikaily, A., Abdelwahab, O., 2009. Treatment of articialtextile dye efuent containing direct yellow 12 by orange peel carbon. Desali-nation 238, 210e232.

    Kim, T., Park, C., Shin, E., Kim, S., 2003. Effects of Cl-based chemical coagulation onelectrochemical oxidation of textile wastewater. Desalination 155, 59e65.

    Kim, T.H., Park, C., Yang, J., Kim, S., 2004. Comparison of disperse and reactive dyeremovals by chemical coagulation and fenton oxidation. Journal of HazardousMaterials 112 (1e2), 95e103.

    Konsowa, A.H., 2003. Decolorization of wastewater containing direct dye byozonation in a batch bubble column reactor. Desalination 158, 233e240.

    Konstantinou, I.K., Albanis, T.A., 2004. TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation ofazo dyes in aqueous solution: kinetic and mechanistic investigations-a review.Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 49, 1e14.

    Kumar, M.N.V.R., 2000. A review of chitin and chitosan applications. Reactive andFunctional Polymers 46, 1e27.

    Kumar, P., Prasad, B., Mishra, I.M., Chand, S., 2008. Decolorization and COD reduc-tion of dyeing wastewater from a cotton textile mill using thermolysis andcoagulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 153, 635e645.

    Kurbus, T., Slokar, Y.M., Marechal, A.M., 2002. The study of the effects of the vari-ables on H2O2/UV decolouration of vinylsulphone dye: Part II. Dyes AndPigments 54, 67e78.

    Kurita, K., 2006. Chitin and chitosan: funtional bioploymers from marine crusta-ceans. Marine Biotechnology 8, 203e226.

    Lau, W.J., Ismail, A.F., 2009. Polymeric nanoltration membranes for textile dyewastewater treatment: preparation, performance evaluation, transportmodelling, and fouling control- a review. Desalination 245, 321e348.

    Lea, M., 2010. Bioremediation of turbid surface water Using Seed extract fromMoringa oleifera tree. Current Protocols in Microbiology 1G.2.1e1G.14, Supple-ment 16.

    Ledakowicz, S., Solecka, M., Zylla, R., 2001. Biodegradation, decolourisation anddetoxication of textile wastewater enhanced by advanced oxidation processes.Journal of Biotechnology 89, 175e184.

    Lee, Y.H., Matthews, R.D., Pavlostathis, S.G., 2006. Biological decolorization ofreactive anthraquinone and phthalocyanine dyes under various oxida-tionereduction conditions. Water Environment Research 78, 156e169.

    Leiknes, T.O., 2009. The effect of coupling coagulation and occulation withmembrane ltration in water treatment: a review. Journal of EnvironmentalSciences 21 (1), 8e12.

    Lin, S.H., Peng, F.C., 1996. Continuous treatment of textile wastewater by combinedcoagulation, electrochemical oxidation and activated sludge. Water Research30, 587e592.

    Mahmoodi, N.M., Salehi, R., Arami, M., Bahrami, H., 2011. Dye removal from col-oured textile wastewater using chitosan in binary systems. Desalination 267,64e72.

    Marcucci, M., Nosenzo, G., Capannelli, G., Ciabatti, I., Corrieri, D., Ciardelli, G., 2001.Treatment and reuse of textile efuents based on new ultraltration and othermembrane technologies. Desalination 138, 75e82.

    Marmagne, O., Coste, C., 1996. Colour removal from textile plant efuents. AmericanDyestuff Reports 85, 15e21.

    Meric, S., Kaptan, D., Olmez, T., 2004. Color and COD removal from wastewatercontaining reactive black 5 using Fentons oxidation process. Chemosphere 54,435e441.

    Merzouk, B., Madani, K., Sekki, A., 2010. Using electrocoagulationeelectrootationtechnology to treat synthetic solution and textile wastewater, two case studies.Desalination 250, 573e577.

    Metcalf, Eddy, 2003. Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, fourth ed.McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Miller, S.M., Fugate, E.J., Craver, V.O., Smith, J.A., Zimmerman, J.B., 2008. Towardsunderstanding the efcacy and mechanism of Opuntia spp. as a natural coag-ulant for potential application in water treatment. Environmental Science andTechnology 42, 4274e4279.

    Mishra, A., Srinivasan, R., Dubey, R., 2002. Flocculation of textile wastewater byplantago psyllium mucilage. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 287,592e596.

    Moghaddam, S.S., Moghaddam, M.R.A., Arami, M., 2010. A comparison study onAcid Red 119 dye removal using two different types of waterworks sludge.Water Science and Technology 61, 1673e1681.

    MOWR, 2000. Annual Report on Wastewater Generation, India.Naimabadi, A., Attar, H.M., Shahsavani, A., 2009. Decolorization and biological

    tal Management 93 (2012) 154e168 167degradation of azo dye reactive Red2 by anaerobic/aerobic sequential process.Iranian Journal of environmental Health, Science and Engineering 6 (2), 67e72.

  • Namasivayam, C., Sumithra, S., 2005. Removal of directred 12B and methylene bluefrom water by adsorption onto Fe(III)/Cr(III) hydroxide, an industrial solidwaste. Journal of Environmental Management 74, 207e215.

    No, H.K., Meyers, S.P., 2000. Application of chitosan for treatment of wastewaters.Reviews of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology 163, 1e28.

    Ong, S.A., Toorisaka, E., Hirata, M., Hano, T., 2005. Decolorization of azo dye (OrangeII) in a sequential UASBeSBR system. Separation and Purication Technology

    Selcuk, H., 2005. Decolourisation and detoxication of textile wastewater byozonation and coagulation processes. Dyes and Pigments 64, 217e222.

    Semerjian, L., Ayoub, G.M., 2003. High pH magnesium coagulation occulation inwastewater treatment. Advances in Environmental Research 7, 389e403.

    Shi, B.Y., Li, G.H., Wang, D.S., Feng, C.H., Tang, H.X., 2007. Removal of direct dyes bycoagulation: the performance of preformed polymeric aluminum species.Journal of Hazardous Materials 143, 567e574.

    A.K. Verma et al. / Journal of Environmental Management 93 (2012) 154e16816842, 297e302.Pala, A., Tokat, E., 2002. Color removal from cotton textile industry wastewater in an

    activated sludge system with various additives. Water Research 36 (11),2920e2925.

    Papic, S., Koprivanac, N., Bozic, A.L., Metes, A., 2004. Removal of some reactive dyesfrom synthetic wastewater by combined Al(III) coagulation/carbon adsorptionprocess. Dyes and Pigments 62, 291e298.

    Paschoal, F.M.M., Anderson, M.A., Zanoni, M.V.B., 2009. The photoelectrocatalyticoxidative treatment of textile wastewater containing disperse dyes. Desalina-tion 249, 1350e1355.

    Patel, H., Vashi, R.T., 2010. Treatment of textile wastewater by adsorption andcoagulation. E-Journal of Chemistry 7 (4), 1468e1476.

    Paul, J., 2008. Removal of COD and colour from textile wastewater using limestoneand activated carbon. M.S Thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    Paulino, A.T., Guilherme, M.R., Reis, A.V., Campese, G.M., Muniz, E.C., Nozaki, J.,2006. Removal of methylene blue dye from an aqueous media using superab-sorbent hydrogel supported on modied polysaccharide. Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 301, 55e62.

    Pearson, J., Lu, F., Gandhi, K., 2004. Disposal of woul scouring sludge by composting.AUTEX Research Journal 4, 147e156.

    Peavy, H.S., Rowe, D.R., Tchobanoglous, G., 1985. Environmental Engineering.McGraw-Hill International Edition, New Delhi.

    Perkowski, J., Kos, L., 2003. Decolouration of model dye house wastewaterwith advanced oxidation processes. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe 11,67e71.

    Phalakornkule, C., Polgumhang, S., Tongdaung, W., Karakat, B., Nuyut, T., 2010.Electrocoagulation of blue reactive, red disperse and mixed dyes, and applica-tion in treating textile efuent. Journal of Environmental Management 91,918e926.

    Project, S.E.A.M., 1999. Textile Sector Report: Cleaner Production Opportunities.(Egypt).

    Rajeswari, K.R., 2000. Ozonation treatment of textile dyes wastewater using plasmaozoniser. Ph.D thesis, University Malaysia, Malaysia.

    Ranganathan, K., Jeyapaul, S., Sharma, D.C., 2007. Assessment of water pollution indifferent bleaching based paper manufacturing and textile dyeing industries inIndia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 134, 363e372.

    Rein, M., 2001. Advanced oxidation processes-current status and prospects, proc.estonian acad. Science Chemistry 50, 59e80.

    Renault, F., Sancey, B., Badot, P.M., Crini, G., 2009. Chitosan for coagulation/occu-lation processes-an eco-friendly approach. European Polymer Journal 45,1337e1348.

    Riera-Torres, M., Gutierrez-Bouzan, C., Crespi, M., 201