31
A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

A REVIEW OF TEACHER

EVALUATIONS

THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

Page 2: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

A HISTORY OF THE TPAI-Revised

Why do we evaluate?• Accountability• Identify level of competency• Improve performance• Validate strong performance• Licensure and certification• Document problem areas/areas to improve• Self-assessment• Employment decisions• As part of the process for Beginning Teachers• Growth and professional development for experienced Teachers

Page 3: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

A History of the TPAI-Revised

Why do we evaluate personnel?• Because it is the law• To improve student performance

Page 4: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

Construction of the TPAI-Revised Adaption from the original TPAI (1986) Response to Excellent Schools Act of 1997 (more

rigorous standards) Alignments with NC law 115C-333 One of several evaluation projects Approved for use in 2000 For full implementation on July 1, 2001

Page 5: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

Construction of the TPAI-Revised TPAI-R for Beginning Teachers developed by

ECU and validated for use with new teachers (Dr. Lynn Bradshaw)

TPAI-R for Experienced Teachers developed by UNC-C and validated for use with experienced or veteran teachers (Dr. Claudia Flowers)

Page 6: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

Legal References Complies with 115C-325 Complies with 115C-333 Complies with 115C-324 Complies with 115C-335 Complies with Teaching Standards adopted and

approved by the State Board of Education

Page 7: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

Issues and Concerns with TPAI-Revised Administrators using the incorrect instruments Incomplete observations Time frame issues Inter-Rater Reliability Accuracy and promptness of feedback Too much reliance on one or two specific

functions

Page 8: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Beginning Teachers Focus or emphasis

• Knowledge of content matter• Knowledge of instructional methods• Planning and use of the NC Standard Course of Study• Classroom management• The minimum competencies and accountabilities

expected of a professional classroom teacher• Compliance with the Beginning Teacher (BT) process

Page 9: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Beginning Teachers Needs of Novice Teachers

• Clearly communicated expectations• Reasonable teaching assignments and preps• A strong support and induction program• Assessments that are consistent and measure the

expectations of the novice teacher• Consistent and accurate feedback

Page 10: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Beginning Teachers Needs of Novice Teachers

• Classroom management skills• Tips on motivating students• How to differentiate instruction• Assessment of student work• Classroom and class work organization• Tips on relating to and communicating with parents• Utilizing testing data to direct instruction

Page 11: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Beginning Teachers A mix of the “old” and the “new”

• Building on the positives of the old TPAI evaluation system

• Addressing the concerns from the old process in the new instrument

• Tying TPAI-R to existing INTASC Standards, research results and teaching standards

Page 12: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Beginning Teachers Kept from the “Old”

• Same Language• 8 TPAI Functions• FODI and FODA• Modified Summative

Instrument• Research-based

Added to the “New”• Four Step Rating Scale• New indicators• LEA developed time line

for observations• Location of post

observation conferences

Page 13: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Beginning Teachers Areas of Major Emphasis Found with TPAI-R

• Multiple sources of documentation and indicators to document performance

• Rating of Unsatisfactory to Above Standard• Replaced emphasis on the six-step lesson plan• Increased emphasis on Functions 6-8:

• Facilitating Instruction• Communicating within the Educational Environment• Performing Non-Instructional Duties

Page 14: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Beginning Teachers Areas of Major Focus

• Time on task for learning• Reflection on student development/responses• Content pedagogy• Diverse learners, critical thinking, technology and motivation• Communication with others• Use of the Standard Course of Study and School Improvement

Plan• Participating in the school’s vision• Emphasis on student learning results• Focus on safe learning environment• Professional development• Reflection as a professional practitioner

Page 15: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Beginning Teacher Requirements for completion, continued

• LEA decides on the time lines BUT it is recommended that observations be conducted throughout the year

• Feedback through post-observation conferences is to be timely (5 to 7 days)

• Action plan required for any summative rating below standard unless the teacher is demoted or non-renewed

• Required of all teachers in their first 4 years of teaching experiences (including BT)

Page 16: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

Beginning Teacher & Probationary Teacher Requirements for completion

• Individual Growth Plan (IGP)• Three (3) full observations• Three (3) post conferences• One (1) observation by a peer• Use of the FODI and FODA for observations• One (1) Summative Evaluation on TPAI-R

Page 17: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Experienced Teachers Basic premise or focus

• Built on same principles as the TPAI-R beginning teachers• Was validated and approved for use with veteran teachers.. i.e.

not new teachers• Approved for use with teachers after four (4) years of experience• Approved for use with those teachers that have demonstrated at

least minimum competencies and abilities• Designed more for professional growth and development of

teachers who have developed and expects minimum competencies and abilities

• Has a formative cycle and a summative cycle that stresses professional growth and the acquisition of new skills

Page 18: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Experienced Teachers Teacher with Career Status on Summative (Full)

Cycle One (1) full TPAI-R One (1) full class period observation with FODA One (1) Pre-conference using new form One (1) Post observation conference Two (2) Snapshot observations (15-20 minutes

is suggested) Individual Growth Plan (IGP) Final Verification Form

Page 19: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

Pre-Conference Questions for Beginning and Experienced Teachers

Revised WCPSS Pre-Conference Questions- Career Teacher

Teacher_________________ Date of pre-conference________

Class or grade level Date of observation__________

_______________________ Time___________

What are the objectives for the lesson that I will be observing?

Show me how the objectives are aligned to the curriculum (or standard course of study)?

Show me a pacing guide and indicate where this lesson fits into the pacing guide?

Show me how these objectives relate to previous learning?

Show me how you establish a baseline for learning for this class?

Show me how you assess student achievement of the objectives---both informally and formally?

Show me how you differentiate instruction for low-achieving students? High-achieving students?

How do you involve the student's parents in their child’s learning?

Are you planning to use technology to deliver instruction? If not, do you have other lessons that use technology to deliver instruction?

Are there any special problems, which are out of your control (with students, classroom facilities) that you would like me to be aware of?

Is there anything I need to know about the lesson before I observe?

Page 20: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Tenured Teachers Professional Growth Cycle

(Formative – 4 out of 5 years)

Accountability Cycle

(Summative – 1 out of 5 years

Page 21: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Experienced Teachers & Re-Employed Retirees Career Teachers on Formative (Off) Cycle IGP Complete at least two(2) Snapshot

observations Final Verification Form (suggested) Do no more that four (4) consecutive cycles

before going on Summative (full) Cycle

Page 22: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

Experienced Teachers without Tenure** Experienced teacher

without Career Status (a probationary teacher with more than 4 years of experience)

Must be on a full cycle until career status is obtained

Three (3) full class period observations utilizing the FODA followed by a summative evaluation

One (1) Pre-conference One (1) peer observation IGP Final Verification Form

** Example: Teacher from out-of-state moving into the district with experience

Page 23: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

Figure 4Cycle and Data Requirements for the Experienced Teacher

EvaluationExperienced Teacher

Satisfactory Performance Unsatisfactory Performance

Probationary*

Professional Growth Cycle(4 out of 5 years)

Accountability Cycle(1 out of 5 years)

Full Evaluation Required

IGPIGP IGP

TPAI-R Snapshot(4 times annually)

TPAI-R Snapshot (2 times annually)

TPAI-R Snapshot(2 times annually)

Alternative Evaluation System:

Personal Growth Activities

TPAI-R Full TPAI-R Full(2 times annually)

Summative Evaluation Form Final Verification

& Summative Report

Summative Evaluation Form Final Verification

•During the probationary cycle, a teacher must be observed a minimum of four (4) times. These observations can be accomplished by a combination of TPAI-R snapshots and TPAI-R Full Reviews. At least one observation must be completed using the TPAI-R FullReview. A school system may elect to conduct more than the four (4) required observations.

Page 24: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

FODI (Formative Observation Data

Instrument)

Typically used for scripting. You may choose an

alternative method to script observations such

as notebook paper.

Page 25: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

FODA (Formative Observation Data

Analysis)

This is where you transcribe the data collected through

scripting during the observation.

Page 26: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Experienced TeachersThe Snapshot (Long Version)

Page 27: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

The TPAI-R for Experienced TeachersThe Snapshot (Short Version)

Page 28: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

TPAI-R: Final Tips Reduce rater errors by:

• Training observers and evaluators on instruments• Stick to the standards and observable performance• Rate each function separately• Document• Collect sources and artifacts to support ratings• Do multiple observations or appraisals• Plan the pre-conference and the post-conference• If you rate below standard, be prepared to offer a

suggestion for improvement

Page 29: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

TPAI-R: Final Tips

Data Resources to consider• Student performance reports• Peer review of materials• Teacher tests and planning books• Parent communication and reports• Observations• Recordings, student work, video tapes or units• Grade books

Page 30: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

TPAI-R: Final Tips Additional recommendations

• Focus on Functions 6, 7, and 8 (often a key)• Distribute observations throughout the year• Attempt to do post-observations within 5 to 7 days• Develop an observation schedule and stick to it• Identify the staff early for which processes to use • Communicate with the staff to explain observation and

evaluation expectations • Monitor and retrain as needed• Do not be afraid to ask for outside help

Page 31: A REVIEW OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS THE TPAI-REVISED FOR BEGINNING AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

TPAI-R Resources and Contacts www.ncpublicschools.org [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]