9
ORIGINAL ARTICLE A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF NON-FATAL HEROIN OVERDOSE D. M. FATOVICH 1 , A. BARTU 2 , & F. F. S. DALY 1 1 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Western Australia, and 2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Curtin University of Technology, Australia Abstract Aims: We aimed to study the prevalence, characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting with non-fatal heroin overdose. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Emergency Department (ED). Participants: Patients attending with non-fatal heroin overdose. Intervention: Nil. Measurement: Descriptive and epidemiological data. Findings: Two-hundred-and-forty-nine overdoses in 224 patients (61.2% male, range 15–49 years). Mean reported age of first heroin use was 18.8 years (range 10–42). Forty-two per cent reported a previous heroin overdose requiring hospital intervention. Co-ingestants included benzodiazepines (61, 27.2%), alcohol (35, 15.6%), cannabis (25, 11.1%), amphetamines (13, 5.8%) and hallucinogens (3, 1.3%). Most patients experienced a benign course; 81 of 115 ambulance presentations (70.4%) received prehospital naloxone and 23 (9.2%) received naloxone in the ED; 67.9% had no investigations and complications were uncommon (two aspiration, one hypoxic brain injury). Median length of stay was 180 min (15 min to 48 h). Only 29 (11.6%) presentations required admission. There were 15 individuals (6.7%) who had 40 (16.1% of the total) repeat presentations. Conclusions: Heroin overdose tends to occur in experienced users who commonly co-ingest other drugs. There is a trend of overdose occurring with increasing frequency in teenage females. Repeat overdosing is common. However, while morbidity is low, these patients require considerable resources. Keywords: Heroin overdose, emergency department, naloxone. Introduction Heroin overdose is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in young people, peaking at 1084 deaths in 1999 (5.6 deaths/100,000 age standardized (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2003). In Australia, the majority of deaths occur in the 15–44-year age group Correspondence: Professor D. M. Fatovich, Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Box X2213 GPO, Perth WA 6847, Australia. Tel: +61 8 9224 2244. Fax: +61 8 9224 7045. E-mail: [email protected] Journal of Substance Use, October 2008; 13(5): 299–307 ISSN 1465-9891 print/ISSN 1475-9942 online # 2008 Informa UK Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/14659890802040773 J Subst Use Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Washington on 11/06/14 For personal use only.

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF NON‐FATAL HEROIN OVERDOSE

  • Upload
    f-f-s

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF NON‐FATAL HEROIN OVERDOSE

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF NON-FATAL HEROINOVERDOSE

D. M. FATOVICH1, A. BARTU2, & F. F. S. DALY1

1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Western Australia, and 2School of Nursing and

Midwifery, Curtin University of Technology, Australia

AbstractAims: We aimed to study the prevalence, characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting withnon-fatal heroin overdose.Design: Prospective observational study.Setting: Emergency Department (ED).Participants: Patients attending with non-fatal heroin overdose.Intervention: Nil.Measurement: Descriptive and epidemiological data.Findings: Two-hundred-and-forty-nine overdoses in 224 patients (61.2% male, range 15–49 years).Mean reported age of first heroin use was 18.8 years (range 10–42). Forty-two per cent reported aprevious heroin overdose requiring hospital intervention. Co-ingestants included benzodiazepines(61, 27.2%), alcohol (35, 15.6%), cannabis (25, 11.1%), amphetamines (13, 5.8%) andhallucinogens (3, 1.3%). Most patients experienced a benign course; 81 of 115 ambulancepresentations (70.4%) received prehospital naloxone and 23 (9.2%) received naloxone in the ED;67.9% had no investigations and complications were uncommon (two aspiration, one hypoxic braininjury). Median length of stay was 180 min (15 min to 48 h). Only 29 (11.6%) presentations requiredadmission. There were 15 individuals (6.7%) who had 40 (16.1% of the total) repeat presentations.Conclusions: Heroin overdose tends to occur in experienced users who commonly co-ingest otherdrugs. There is a trend of overdose occurring with increasing frequency in teenage females. Repeatoverdosing is common. However, while morbidity is low, these patients require considerableresources.

Keywords: Heroin overdose, emergency department, naloxone.

Introduction

Heroin overdose is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in young people, peaking

at 1084 deaths in 1999 (5.6 deaths/100,000 age standardized (Australian Bureau of

Statistics, 2003). In Australia, the majority of deaths occur in the 15–44-year age group

Correspondence: Professor D. M. Fatovich, Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Box X2213 GPO, Perth

WA 6847, Australia. Tel: +61 8 9224 2244. Fax: +61 8 9224 7045. E-mail: [email protected]

Journal of Substance Use, October 2008; 13(5): 299–307

ISSN 1465-9891 print/ISSN 1475-9942 online # 2008 Informa UK Ltd.

DOI: 10.1080/14659890802040773

J Su

bst U

se D

ownl

oade

d fr

om in

form

ahea

lthca

re.c

om b

y U

nive

rsity

of

Was

hing

ton

on 1

1/06

/14

For

pers

onal

use

onl

y.

Page 2: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF NON‐FATAL HEROIN OVERDOSE

(English, Holman, Milne, Winter, Hulse, Coddek, Bower, Corti, De Klerk, Knuiman,

Kurinczuk, Lewin, & Ryan, 1995; Zador, Sunjic & Darke, 1996). Death is predominantly

due to overdose, rather than trauma, suicide or infective causes (Darke & Zador, 1996).

There is, however, little data regarding the epidemiology of non-fatal heroin overdose

presenting to Emergency Departments (EDs) in Australia. Whilst there is a growing body

of literature on drug related presentations to the ED, most studies have focused on alcohol.

The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics, disposition and resource use of

patients presenting to the ED with non-fatal heroin overdose.

Background/literature

Overdose is a common phenomenon among heroin users (Sporer, 1999). Data from

international and Australian studies suggest an annual fatal overdose rate of 0.8%

(Degenhardt, 2002; Darke, Mattick, & Degenhardt, 2003). It has been estimated that the

standardized mortality rate of heroin users is 13 times that of their peers (Hulse, English,

Milne, & Holman, 1999). Non-fatal heroin overdoses are common (Bradvik, Hulenvik,

Frank, Medvedeo, & Berglund, 2007; Darke, Ross, & Hall, 1996; Gossop, Griffiths, Powis,

Williamson, & Strang, 1996; McGregor, Darke, Ali, & Christie, 1998; Neale, 2003; Pollini,

McCall, Mehta, Vlahov, & Strathdee, 2006; Warner-Smith, Darke, & Day, 2002).

Approximately 3.1% or one in 20 to one in 30 overdose events result in death (Darke et al.,

2003).

Non-fatal overdoses have been studied from different perspectives in different countries.

Bradvik et al. investigated the experience of overdoses among 149 heroin users recruited

from a Syringe Exchange Programme in Malmo, Sweden. Polydrug use was common, 74%

had overdosed and 96% had observed an overdose in others (Bradvik et al., 2007).

McGregor et al. investigated the prevalence and risk factors of non-fatal overdoses

among 218 heroin users in Adelaide, South Australia (McGregor et al., 1998). Forty-eight

per cent had experienced at least one overdose and 70% had been present at someone else’s

overdose. This is similar to the 48% of overdoses reported in a study of 1427 street

recruited heroin injectors in San Francisco (Seal, Kral, Gee, Moore, Bluthenthal, Lorvick,

& Edlin, 2001).

In a study of 135 opioid users from southern England, Glasgow and Edinburgh 56% had

overdosed (Man, Best, Gossop, Stillwell, & Strang, 2004). Risk of overdose has been found

to vary as a result of prescribed and non-prescribed drug use. Yin et al assessed the

prevalence and risk factors for non-fatal overdoses among 731 heroin users in Sichuan

province China (Yin, Qin, Ruan, Qian, Hao, Xie, Chen, Zhang, Xia, Wu, Lai, & Shao,

2007). Twelve per cent had experienced at least one drug overdose and 51% had

experienced two or more. Risk factors included recent release from prison, use of

benzodiazepines, longer duration of drug use and longer duration of methadone treatment

in the past year.

Brugal et al examined factors associated with non-fatal overdoses among 2556 subjects

being treated for heroin dependence in Spain (Brugal, Barrio, Regidor, Royuela, & Suelves,

2002). The prevalence of overdose was 10%. Factors associated with risk of overdose were

polydrug use, positive HIV status and route of heroin administration (injecting). Others

have used ambulance data to estimate characteristics of non-fatal overdose victims,

circumstances of overdose and trends over time (Schulz-Schaeffer, Peters, & Puschel,

1993; Bammer, Ostini, & Sengoz, 1995; Degenhardt, Hall, & Adelstein, 2001).

Ambulances have been called to from 44 to 56% of overdoses witnessed by other heroin

300 D. M. Fatovich et al.

J Su

bst U

se D

ownl

oade

d fr

om in

form

ahea

lthca

re.c

om b

y U

nive

rsity

of

Was

hing

ton

on 1

1/06

/14

For

pers

onal

use

onl

y.

Page 3: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF NON‐FATAL HEROIN OVERDOSE

users (Darke et al., 1996; Thackaway & Poder, 2000). The number of presentations of

non-fatal heroin overdoses to emergency departments is similar to ambulance callouts for

these events (Cook, Indig, Grayj, & McGrath, 2004). Despite the high prevalence of non-

fatal overdoses among heroin users, data on the impact on emergency departments is

relatively sparse.

Afghanistan has recently experienced an opium ‘boom’. Supply of opium from that

country exceeds global demand by over 3000 tons (United Nations Office on Drugs and

Crime, 2007). If this over-supply reaches current and potential users of heroin, it is likely

that non-fatal and possibly fatal heroin overdoses will increase, as will ambulance call-outs

and presentations to emergency departments. Given this, data on the impact of non-fatal

heroin overdoses on emergency departments is particularly relevant.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was undertaken at Royal Perth Hospital, from 1 September

1998 to 31 August 1999. The study was granted exemption from ethics committee review

as it was regarded as a quality improvement project. Royal Perth Hospital is the largest

hospital in Western Australia (WA). It is located on the edge of the inner city. The annual

census of the ED is some 53,000, with an admission rate of 40%.

All patients presenting with a clinical diagnosis of heroin overdose were enrolled. Heroin

overdose was determined clinically at presentation, using a validated case definition

(Hoffman, Schriger, & Luo, 1991) and confirmed by subsequent history. Patients were

considered to have suffered a heroin overdose if there was clinical evidence of opioid

intoxication (pupillary meiosis, respiratory rate ,12, Glasgow Coma Scale ,12) with

either a history of opiate use from the patient or bystanders, or circumstantial evidence of

intravenous drug abuse (e.g. presence of drug paraphernalia at the scene).

Medical staff in the ED used a preformatted data sheet to contemporaneously record

demographic, historical, and clinical data on all patients with heroin overdose. A

retrospective review of ED computer records demonstrated 100% capture of heroin

overdose cases. Ancillary investigations were ordered according to clinical need.

Confirmatory qualitative urine drug screens for drugs of abuse were not performed, as

this did not comply with normal clinical practice.

Data were recorded and analysed with SPSS (version 8; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).

Standard descriptives were obtained and percentages given. Summary statistics were

performed on all variables. Group differences were analysed using chi-square tests for

categorical variables. The alpha level was set at 0.05.

Results

During the 12-month study period, 249 (0.5%) of the 52842 ED presentations were for

heroin overdose. These 249 presentations occurred in 224 patients. Heroin overdoses

represented 25.2% of the 988 drug intoxications that occurred during the study period,

averaging 21 per month (range 16–29).

The distribution of patients by age, sex, ethnicity, marital status and accommodation is

shown in Table I. These results were based on the patient’s first presentation. The age at

which patients reported first using heroin is shown in Table II. The mean reported age was

18.8 years (range 10–42). More males than females commenced heroin use in the 22 years

and over group.

Non-fatal heroin overdose 301

J Su

bst U

se D

ownl

oade

d fr

om in

form

ahea

lthca

re.c

om b

y U

nive

rsity

of

Was

hing

ton

on 1

1/06

/14

For

pers

onal

use

onl

y.

Page 4: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF NON‐FATAL HEROIN OVERDOSE

Only two patients presented after their first use of heroin, one requiring admission to

ICU for a hypoxic brain injury. There were no deaths in this cohort. However, one fatality

due to heroin occurred in the public toilet of the ED waiting room. This person had not

attended the ED for assessment and was not included in the study. Two-hundred-and-one

(80.7%) presentations were in Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) categories 1–3 (ATS 1

patients should be seen immediately by a doctor, ATS 2 within 10 min and ATS 3 within

30 min; Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, 2006).

The highest proportion of heroin overdoses occurred on Wednesdays (n550, 19.6%).

Sundays and Mondays had the lowest proportion. The highest proportion of heroin

overdoses arrived at ED between 12.00 and 18.00 hours (113, 45.4%) then 18.00–24.00

hours (92, 37.0%), 06.00–12.00 hours (27, 10.8%) and 00.00–06.00 (17, 6.8%). The

location of the overdose and method of transport to the ED are described in Table III.

Eighty (42.3%) patients of the 189 who provided data reported at least one previous

heroin overdose requiring hospital intervention, and 57 (34.8%) patients of the 164 who

provided data reported at least one previous heroin overdose for which they did not present

to hospital (Table IV).

Self-reported co-ingestion of other drugs included benzodiazepines (61, 27.2%), alcohol

(35, 15.6%), cannabis (25, 11.1%), amphetamines (13, 5.8%), hallucinogens (3, 1.3%)

and other drugs (9, 4%). Only 15 (6.0%) of 249 presentations presented with a Glasgow

Coma Score of less than or equal to 8, and 66 (26.5%) of presentations had a respiratory

rate of less than or equal to 8 breaths per minute on arrival.

Table I. Demographic characteristics of 224 patients (mean age525.7 years, range 14.5–49.3 years) with non-

fatal heroin overdose

n %

Gender (224)

Male 137 61.2

Female 87 38.8

Ethnicity (216)

Caucasian 193 89.4

Aboriginal 12 5.5

Other 11 5.1

Marital status (208)

Single/divorced/separated 169 81.2

Married/de facto 39 18.8

Accommodation (199)

Living with others 144 72.4

Living alone 38 19.1

No fixed abode 17 8.5

n5( ). Numbers vary because of missing values.

Table II. Age of initial heroin use

Age Male (n598) Female (n571)

10–14 years 13 (13.3%) 14 (19.7%)

15–17 years 28 (28.6%) 21 (29.6%)

18–21 years 32 (32.6%) 23 (32.4%)

22 years and over 25 (25.5%) 13 (18.3%)

x252.038, df53, p50.565.

302 D. M. Fatovich et al.

J Su

bst U

se D

ownl

oade

d fr

om in

form

ahea

lthca

re.c

om b

y U

nive

rsity

of

Was

hing

ton

on 1

1/06

/14

For

pers

onal

use

onl

y.

Page 5: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF NON‐FATAL HEROIN OVERDOSE

Most patients experienced a benign course with little medical intervention required. Of

the 249 presentations, 115 (46.2%) arrived by ambulance and naloxone was given by

ambulance personnel in 81 (70.4%) cases; another 23 (9.2%) received naloxone in the ED.

No adverse effects resulted from the use of naloxone. The majority of presentations (237,

92.9%) required no assisted ventilation. No investigations were performed in 169 (67.9%)

presentations. Complications in this cohort were uncommon, with two patients

experiencing aspiration, and one patient suffering a hypoxic brain injury.

The median time that these patients spent in the ED was 180 min (mode 120, range

15 min–48 h). Only 29 (11.6%) presentations required admission. Of these, 28 (96.6%)

were admitted to the ED Observation ward. One patient required admission to the

intensive care unit. The majority of presentations (181, 72.7%) were discharged directly

from the ED. A proportion (33, 13.3%) were either discharged against medical advice, or

simply absconded. Deliberate self harm was identified in only 12 (4.8%) episodes.

There were 15 individuals (seven male) who had 40 repeat presentations. This included

12 patients who presented twice, and single patients who presented four, five and seven

times. No factor was identified that was predictive of repeat presentations.

Discussion

Heroin overdose appears to occur in experienced users who also ingest other central

nervous system depressants. Most patients were Caucasian and single, and lived with their

friends, parents or a partner. A third had used heroin alone, which is a risk factor for poor

Table III. Overdose location, used with and mode of conveyance

n %

Overdose location (249)

Public place 108 49.8

Home (own friends) 93 42.8

Other (e.g. hostel) 16 7.4

Used heroin with (204)

Others 138 67.6

Alone 66 32.4

Conveyed to ED by (249)

Ambulance 115 61.5

Friends 27 14.4

Police 20 10.7

Self 10 5.4

Other 9 4.8

Parents 6 3.2

n5( ). Numbers vary because of missing values.

Table IV. Self-report of previous heroin overdoses

Previous overdoses Required hospital intervention (n5189) No hospital intervention (n5164)

Nil 109 (57.7%) 107 (65.2%)

Once 31 (16.4%) 9 (5.5%)

Twice 14 (7.4%) 16 (9.8%)

Three times 11 (5.8%) 6 (3.6%)

Four or more 24 (12.7%) 26 (15.9%)

Non-fatal heroin overdose 303

J Su

bst U

se D

ownl

oade

d fr

om in

form

ahea

lthca

re.c

om b

y U

nive

rsity

of

Was

hing

ton

on 1

1/06

/14

For

pers

onal

use

onl

y.

Page 6: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF NON‐FATAL HEROIN OVERDOSE

outcome after accidental overdose. Most patients were conveyed to the ED by ambulance.

This is considerably higher than the 12–15% reported elsewhere (Darke et al., 1996;

McGregor et al., 1998), but is consistent with recent Australian ambulance service data

(Dietze, Jolley, Cvetkovski, Cantwell, Jacobs, & Indig, 2004).

This study reveals a trend of overdose occurring in teenage females. It is noteworthy that

some patients reported their first use of heroin between the ages of 10–14 years. These were

more likely to be females. This is consistent with reports that there has been a steady

decline in the age of initiation to heroin use, particularly amongst females (Hall W, 1999).

The average length of stay in the ED was 4 h. This is similar to the 2–4 h reported by

(Smith, Leake, Loflin, & Yealy, 1992), but much less than the 20 h reported by (Cook,

Moeschler, Michaudk. & Yersin, 1998). There has been some discussion in the literature

on the optimal duration for observation of patients with heroin overdose (Osterwalder,

1995; Smith et al., 1992). This mainly revolves around concerns of the relatively shorter

half life of naloxone (20 min) versus heroin (2–3 h). Early discharge of a patient with heroin

overdose who has received naloxone may result in subsequent deterioration. Recently,

Vilke reviewed 998 out of hospital patients who received naloxone and refused further

treatment, and 601 coroners’ cases of opioid overdose deaths. There were no cases in which

a patient was treated by paramedics with naloxone within 12 hours of being found dead

(Vilke, Sloane, Smith, & Chan, 2003). Importantly, we found no adverse events associated

with naloxone use. This contrasts with the 45% adverse event rate reported previously

(Buajordet, Naess, Jacobsen, & Brors, 2004).

Repeat overdosing is common, with 42% of patients reporting at least one previous

heroin overdose involving hospital intervention, and 12.7% reporting four or more previous

heroin overdoses requiring hospital intervention. About a third of patients reported a

previous overdose that had not required hospital intervention. It is likely that repeat

overdosing increases the mortality risk.

There were limitations to this study. The main limitation is that much of the data were

obtained by self-report. The validity of self-report of recent drug use has been demonstrated

to vary by site, drug types and subject characteristics (Skelton, Dann, Ong, Hamilton, &

Ilett, 1998). A significant proportion of the cohort left the ED prior to answering the

questions on the preformatted data sheet, thus increasing the proportion of missing data.

However, working with heroin overdose patients in a busy ED is fraught with difficulty,

especially in terms of collecting data that is not essential for their emergency treatment. So

while the majority of those who left before answering the questions on the preformatted data

sheet were those who absconded or discharged against medical advice, some patients refused

to co-operate with the study and in some it was not clinically appropriate. One has to accept

this as part of the natural behaviour of this cohort. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, this is the

largest prospective series of such a group in the ED.

The other limitations are that toxicological testing was not used to confirm the clinical

diagnosis of heroin overdose. Also, the complications of heroin overdose may have been

under-estimated as patients with trauma were not screened for the presence of opioids, and

radiographic and laboratory investigations were only performed when clinically indicated.

Data on the use of pharmacotherapeutic strategies, such as methadone and naltrexone was

limited in this cohort as we had a very high proportion of missing data for these variables.

This study was performed at a time of peak heroin related deaths, with rates of opiate

overdose declining in recent years (Australian Crime Commission, 2005). Indeed, we had

only 23 heroin overdose presentations to our ED in 2006, reflecting a lack of heroin

availability and the increased use of amphetamines (Gray, Fatovich, McCoubrie, & Daly,

304 D. M. Fatovich et al.

J Su

bst U

se D

ownl

oade

d fr

om in

form

ahea

lthca

re.c

om b

y U

nive

rsity

of

Was

hing

ton

on 1

1/06

/14

For

pers

onal

use

onl

y.

Page 7: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF NON‐FATAL HEROIN OVERDOSE

2007). However, heroin related overdose and deaths appear volatile (Degenhardt, Conroy,

Gilmour, & Hall, 2005; Drug and Alcohol Office, 2005). Currently, EDs are overcrowded

and at capacity (Fatovich, Nagree, & Sprivulis, 2005). Hence, our report is a timely

reminder of the potential impact that heroin overdose can have on the hospital system, as

these patients require considerable clinical resources during their stay.

Each heroin overdose is potentially a life-threatening event. Given the fact that most

patients are discharged, presentation to the ED is an opportunity to implement harm

minimization strategies to avert the risk of future overdose. Brief interventions could readily

be incorporated into ED management and has already been used in outpatient settings

(Bernstein, Bernstein, Tassiopoulos, Heeren, Levensons, & Hingson, 2005). Further

research on counselling strategies is needed. Additional research on the mortality and

longitudinal use of health services by this cohort is ongoing.

Conclusions

The main findings of this study were that heroin overdose tends to occur in experienced

users who commonly co-ingest other drugs. There is a trend of overdose occurring with

increasing frequency in teenage females and repeat overdosing is common. However, while

morbidity is low, these patients require considerable resources.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all staff who participated in the study, especially Lisa Evans,

Research Assistant, Next Step, and Bevis Kay, Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal

Perth Hospital. We thank Dr Alan Quigley, Director of Clinical Services, Next Step

Specialist Drug and Alcohol Services, for his support.

References

Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. (2006). Policy on the Australasian Triage Scale. Canberra: ACEM.

URL: http://www.acem.org.au/media/policies_and_guidelines/PO6_Aust_Triage_Scale_ - _Nov_2000.pdf.

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2003). Drug induced deaths, Australia, 1991–2001. Melbourne: ABS.

Australian Crime Commission. (2005). Heroin. Illicit drug data report 2003–04. Canberra: ACC. URL: http://

www.crimecommission.gov.au/content/publications/iddr_2003_04/05_HEROIN.pdf.

Bammer, G., Ostini, R., & Sengoz, A. (1995). Using ambulance service records to examine nonfatal heroin

overdoses. Australian Journal of Public Health, 19, 316–317.

Bernstein, J., Bernstein, E., Tassiopoulos, K., Heeren, T., Levenson, S., & Hingson, R. (2005). Brief motivational

intervention at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use. Drug Alcohol Depend, 77, 49–59.

Author contributions

DF supervised the research and wrote the paper. AB was involved in the intellectual

planning and conduct of the research, performed the analysis and contributed to writing

the paper. FD conceived and implemented the project and critically reviewed the paper.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the

content and writing of the paper.

Non-fatal heroin overdose 305

J Su

bst U

se D

ownl

oade

d fr

om in

form

ahea

lthca

re.c

om b

y U

nive

rsity

of

Was

hing

ton

on 1

1/06

/14

For

pers

onal

use

onl

y.

Page 8: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF NON‐FATAL HEROIN OVERDOSE

Bradvik, L., Hulenvik, P., Frank, A., Medvedeo, A., & Berglund, M. (2007). Self-reported and observed heroin

overdoses in Malmo. Journal of Substance Use, 12, 119–126.

Brugal, M. T., Barrio, G., De, L. F., Regidor, E., Royuela, L., & Suelves, J. M. (2002). Factors associated with

non-fatal heroin overdose: assessing the effect of frequency and route of heroin administration. Addiction, 97,

319–327.

Buajordet, I., Naess, A. C., Jacobsen, D., & Brors, O. (2004). Adverse events after naloxone treatment of episodes

of suspected acute opioid overdose. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 11, 19–23.

Cook, S., Indig, D., Gray, J., & McGrath, D. (2004). Opiate overdose and health treatment options for opiate

users in New South Wales, 1999–2002. NSW Public Health Bulletin, 15, 125–131.

Cook, S., Moeschler, O., Michaud, K., & Yersin, B. (1998). Acute opiate overdose: characteristics of 190

consecutive cases. Addiction, 93, 1559–1565.

Darke, S., Mattick, R. P., & Degenhardt, L. (2003). The ratio of non-fatal to fatal heroin overdose. Addiction, 98,

1169–1171.

Darke, S., Ross, J., & Hall, W. (1996). Overdose among heroin users in Sydney, Australia: I. Prevalence and

correlates of non-fatal overdose. Addiction, 91, 405–411.

Darke, S., & Zador, D. (1996). Fatal heroin ‘overdose’: a review. Addiction, 91, 1765–1772.

Degenhardt, L. (2002). Opioid overdose in Australia 2001. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre.

Degenhardt, L., Hall, W., & Adelstein, B. A. (2001). Ambulance calls to suspected overdoses: New South Wales

patterns July 1997 to June 1999. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25, 447–450.

Degenhardt, L. J., Conroy, E., Gilmour, S., & Hall, W. D. (2005). The effect of a reduction in heroin supply on

fatal and non-fatal drug overdoses in New South Wales, Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 182, 20–23.

Dietze, P., Jolley, D., Cvetkovski, S., Cantwell, K., Jacobs, I., & Indig, D. (2004). Characteristics of non-fatal

opioid overdoses attended by ambulance services in Australia. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Public

Health, 28, 569–575.

Drug and Alcohol Office. (2005). Heroin related deaths 1995–2005, Research Bulletin. Perth: Government of

Western Australia.

English, D., Holman, C., Milne, E., Winter, M., Hulse, G., Codde, K., Bower, C., Corti, B., De Klerk, N.,

Knuiman, M., Kurinczuk, J., Lewin, G., & Ryan, G. (1995). The quantification of drug caused morbidity and

mortality in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health.

Fatovich, D. M., Nagree, Y., & Sprivulis, P. (2005). Access block causes emergency department overcrowding and

ambulance diversion in Perth, Western Australia. Emergency Medicine Journal, 22, 351–354.

Gossop, M., Griffiths, P., Powis, B., Williamson, S., & Strang, J. (1996). Frequency of non-fatal heroin overdose:

survey of heroin users recruited in non-clinical settings. British Medical Journal, 313, 402.

Gray, S. D., Fatovich, D. M., McCoubrie, D. L., & Daly, F. F. (2007). Amphetamine-related presentations to an

inner-city tertiary emergency department: a prospective evaluation. Medical Journal of Australia, 186, 336–339.

Hall, W., Degenhardt, L. J., & Lynsky, M. (1999). Trends in opioid overdose and suicide mortality in young adults in

Australia, 1964–1997. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre.

Hoffman, J. R., Schriger, D. L., & Luo, J. S. (1991). The empiric use of naloxone in patients with altered mental

status: a reappraisal. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 20, 246–252.

Hulse, G. K., English, D. R., Milne, E., & Holman, C. D. (1999). The quantification of mortality resulting from

the regular use of illicit opiates. Addiction, 94, 221–229.

Man, L. H., Best, D., Gossop, M., Stillwell, G., & Strang, J. (2004). Relationship between prescribing and risk of

opiate overdose among drug users in and out of maintenance treatment. European Addiction Research, 10,

35–40.

McGregor, C., Darke, S., Ali, R., & Christie, P. (1998). Experience of non-fatal overdose among heroin users in

Adelaide, Australia: circumstances and risk perceptions. Addiction, 93, 701–711.

Neale, J. (2003). The ratio of non-fatal to fatal heroin overdose. Addiction, 98, 1171.

Osterwalder, J. J. (1995). Patients intoxicated with heroin or heroin mixtures: how long should they be monitored?

European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2, 97–101.

Pollini, R. A., McCall, L., Mehta, S. H., Vlahov, D., & Strathdee, S. A. (2006). Non-fatal overdose and

subsequent drug treatment among injection drug users. Drug Alcohol Dependence, 83, 104–110.

Schulz-Schaeffer, W., Peters, T., & Puschel, K. (1993). Drug abuse emergencies in Hamburg 1990/91. Forensic

Science International, 62, 167–171.

Seal, K. H., Kral, A. H., Gee, L., Moore, L. D., Bluthenthal, R. N., Lorvick, J., & Edlin, B. R. (2001). Predictors

and prevention of nonfatal overdose among street-recruited injection heroin users in the San Francisco Bay

Area, 1998–1999. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1842–1846.

Skelton, H., Dann, L. M., Ong, R. T., Hamilton, T., & Ilett, K. F. (1998). Drug screening of patients who

deliberately harm themselves admitted to the emergency department. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, 20, 98–103.

306 D. M. Fatovich et al.

J Su

bst U

se D

ownl

oade

d fr

om in

form

ahea

lthca

re.c

om b

y U

nive

rsity

of

Was

hing

ton

on 1

1/06

/14

For

pers

onal

use

onl

y.

Page 9: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF NON‐FATAL HEROIN OVERDOSE

Smith, D. A., Leake, L., Loflin, J. R., & Yealy, D. M. (1992). Is admission after intravenous heroin overdose

necessary? Annals of Emergency Medicine, 21, 1326–1330.

Sporer, K. A. (1999). Acute heroin overdose. Annals of Internal Medicine, 130, 584–590.

Thackaway, S., & Poder, A. (2000). Heroin use and related harm in NSW: results from the National Drug

Strategy Household Survey. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin 11.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2007). Afghanistan Opium Survey 2007. Geneva: United Nations

Office on Drugs and Crime.

Vilke, G. M., Sloane, C., Smith, A. M., & Chan, T. C. (2003). Assessment for deaths in out-of-hospital heroin

overdose patients treated with naloxone who refuse transport. Academy of Emergency Medicine, 10, 893–896.

Warner-Smith, M., Darke, S., & Day, C. (2002). Morbidity associated with non-fatal heroin overdose. Addiction,

97, 963–967.

Yin, L., Qin, G., Ruan, Y., Qian, H. Z., Hao, C., Xie, L., Chen, K., Zhang, Y., Xia, Y., Wu, J., Lai, S., & Shao, Y.

(2007). Nonfatal overdose among heroin users in southwestern China. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol

Abuse, 33, 505–516.

Zador, D., Sunjic, S., & Darke, S. (1996). Heroin-related deaths in New South Wales, 1992: toxicological findings

and circumstances. Medical Journal of Australia, 164, 204–207.

Non-fatal heroin overdose 307

J Su

bst U

se D

ownl

oade

d fr

om in

form

ahea

lthca

re.c

om b

y U

nive

rsity

of

Was

hing

ton

on 1

1/06

/14

For

pers

onal

use

onl

y.