Upload
margaretmargaret-copeland
View
237
Download
6
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A Practical Procedure for A Practical Procedure for
ab initioab initio Determination of Determination of
Vibrational Spectroscopic Constants, Vibrational Spectroscopic Constants,
Resonances, and PolyadsResonances, and Polyads
William F. PolikHope College, Holland, MI
June 2006
Chemical Reactions Occur viaChemical Reactions Occur viaExcited Vibrational StatesExcited Vibrational States
Reaction Coordinate
Vibrational States
Reactants
Products
En
erg
y
Transition State
HFCO Pure Vibrational SpectrumHFCO Pure Vibrational Spectrum
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
Inte
nsity
Frequency (cm-1)
31 HFCO
Vibrational State ModelsVibrational State Models
Harmonic Anharmonic Polyad
iivE
i ji
jiijii vvxvE 1 1
2 2
3 3
12 13
21 23
31
11
22
3332
c cHH
H
H
H
H E
cH
c
c
H
H
c
Calculation MethodCalculation Method
1. Compute equilibration geometry
2. Compute PES derivatives
3. Calculate spectroscopic constants
4. Identify important resonances
5. Compute excited vibrational states
lkji
4
kji
3
ji
2
qqqq
E
qqq
E
E
CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVQZ
ωi xij K
POLYAD program
1 Δ
E
K
1. Compute Equilibration Geometry1. Compute Equilibration Geometry
• Geometry of energy minimum needed for Taylor expansion of PES
• Key points in calculation– Correlated theory and high quality basis, e.g., CCSD(T) and
aug-cc-pVQZ
– Tight convergence of SCF wavefunction and optimized structure
• Program used– Molpro (Werner & Knowles)
...!4
1
!3
1
!2
1
,,, 0
4
,, 0
3
, 0
2
0
0
lkjilkji
lkjikjikji
kji
jiji
jiii
i
qqqqqqqq
Eqqq
qqq
E
qqqq
Eq
q
EEE
2. Compute PES Derivatives 2. Compute PES Derivatives
• Taylor-series derivatives are molecular force constants
• Key points in calculation:– Symmetrized internal coordinates– Numerical derivatives
• Programs used– FE/BE (Martin): list of displaced geometries; assemble derivatives– Intder (Allen): coordinate transformations– Molpro (Werner & Knowles): energy points
q q 0
E( q)
E(q)
Δq
Δq)E(Δq)E(
q
E
2
ijklijkij
!4
1
!3
1
!2
1
,,, 0
4
,, 0
3
, 0
2
lkjilkji
lkjikjikji
kjijiji
jiqqqq
qqqq
Eqqq
qqq
Eqq
EE
3. Calculate Spectroscopic Constants3. Calculate Spectroscopic Constants
• Force field is defined in terms of displacements qi
but vibrational energy levels are quantized by vi
• Second order perturbation theory relate ijk and ijkl to xij
• Program used– Spectro (Handy)
lkji
lkjiijklkji
kjiijkii
iN qqqqqqqqqqqE,,,
241
,,612
21
632,1 ,,
ji
jiiji
iiN vvxvEvvvE 21
21
21
0632,1 ,,
Spectroscopic ConstantsSpectroscopic Constants
Refs: Nielsen (1959), Papousek & Aliev (1982)
k kil
kiiik
iiiiiix 22
222
416
38
16
k kjikjikjikji
kjikijk
k i
j
j
iij
k
jjkiikiijjij Bx
2222
2
2
44
4. Identify Important Resonances4. Identify Important Resonances
• Perturbation theory breaks down at resonances
• For each resonant interaction– Modify calculation of xij
– Determine resonance constant K
• Program used– Spectro-modified (Handy, Martin, Polik)
Spectroscopic ConstantsSpectroscopic Constants
Refs: Nielsen (1959), Papousek & Aliev (1982)
k kik
kiiik
iiiiiix 22
222
416
38
16
k kjikjikjikji
kjikijk
k i
j
j
iij
k
jjkiikiijjij Bx
2222
2
2
44
resonance denominator when 2ωi≈ωk
resonance denominator when ωi≈ωj+ ωj, ωj≈ωi+ ωk, or ωk≈ωi+ ωj
4. Identify Important Resonances4. Identify Important Resonances
• Perturbation theory breaks down at resonances
• For each resonant interaction– Modify calculation of xij
– Determine resonance constant K
• Program used– Spectro-modified (Handy, Martin, Polik)
Modified Spectroscopic ConstantsModified Spectroscopic Constants
Refs: Papousek & Aliev (1982), Martin & Taylor (1997)
k ikiikiiiik
iiii
k kik
kiiik
iiiiiix
411
32
1
16
416
38
16
2
22
222
k kjikjikjikjiijk
k i
j
j
iij
k
jjkiikiijj
k kjikjikjikji
kjikijk
k i
j
j
iij
k
jjkiikiijjij
B
Bx
1111
8
1
44
2
44
2
2
2222
2
partial fraction expansion
drop resonance term(s)
Resonance ConstantsResonance Constants
Refs: Lehmann (1989), Martin & Taylor (1997)
ijkiijjiiijkijkkij kKkK 21
,,
m mjjmjjmiimiikkmiim
m mkimkiikm
ki
kiikiikk
m mkmimkkmiim
m kim
mikm
ki
kiikiikkkkii
B
BK
1111
16
1
11
4
1
4
4
1
4
1
8
1
2
1
4
222
2222
22
222
,
5. Compute Excited Vibrational States 5. Compute Excited Vibrational States
• Define model parameters (, x, K)
• Determine polyads
H2O CCSD(T): aug-cc-pVQZ/cc-pVTZw1o 1 0 0 1 0 0 3684.92372284 -1w2o 0 1 0 0 1 0 1610.20330698 -1w3o 0 0 1 0 0 1 3797.96450773 -1x11 2 0 0 2 0 0 -43.64165166 -1x12* 1 1 0 1 1 0 -37.99219452 -1x13 1 0 1 1 0 1 -167.62218355 -1x22* 0 2 0 0 2 0 -11.33265207 -1x23 0 1 1 0 1 1 -19.05478905 -1x33 0 0 2 0 0 2 -49.68139858 -1K22,1 0 2 0 1 0 0 -154.23334812 -1K11,33 2 0 0 0 0 2 -160.77598615 -1
2132K11,33
1221K1,22
1123K1,22
25
• Calculate matrix elements
• Diagonalize matrices; report energy & wavefunction
• Program used– Polyad (Polik)
Hamiltonian matrix: 8718.167 -188.897 0.000 -80.388 -188.897 8255.922 -243.864 0.000 0.000 -243.864 7767.700 0.000 -80.388 0.000 0.000 8957.964
Eigenvalues and vectors (columns): 7661.582 8286.153 8764.315 8987.704 0.071 -0.375 0.857 -0.345 0.398 -0.838 -0.361 0.095 0.915 0.394 0.088 -0.019 0.004 -0.045 0.356 0.933
Compare to Manual MethodCompare to Manual Method
Summary of MethodSummary of Method
1. Compute equilibration geometry
2. Compute PES derivatives
3. Calculate vibrational spectroscopic constants
4. Identify important resonances; modify constants & calculate resonance constants
5. Compute excited vibrational states using polyad model
H2O Experimental Fits
-200
-100
0
100
200
0 5000 10000 15000
Observed Energy
Cal
c - O
bs E
nerg
y
HarmonicModel
AnharmonicModel
PolyadModel
H2O Polyad Model Calculations
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 5000 10000 15000
Observed Energy
Cal
c - O
bs E
nerg
y
VTZ/VTZ
AVQZ/VTZ
PolyadModel Fit
Interpretations and ConclusionsInterpretations and Conclusions
• Polyad model is useful and practical
– Experimental fits are excellent for predicting excited vibrational states (± 10 cm-1)
– Ab initio computation of excited states is relatively accurate (± 20 cm-1)
• Appropriate basis sets are
– AVQZ for harmonic force field
– VTZ for anharmonic force field
• Include resonances when K*HO/E>0.1~0.3
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
• Ruud van Ommen (Netherlands)
• Ben Ellingson (Univ of Minnesota)
• John Davisson (Hope College)
• Bob Field (MIT)
• Peter Taylor (Univ of Warwick)
• Research Corporation, Dreyfus Foundation, NSF