Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A Performance Comparison of
Color Vision Tests for Pilots
Requirement
M. Marechal, M. Delbarre, J. Tesson, C. Lacambre, F. Froussart-Maille
Percy Military Hospital,
Clamart, FRANCE
Introduction
Color-deficiency
9 % of men and 0.5 % of women
1.5 to 3% of military pilots candidates (Air Force)
11 to 13% of ophthalmologic incapacity
Protanomalous trichromat
Anomalous trichromats
(abnormal cone) Deuteranomalous trichromat
Protanopes
Dichromats
(absent cone) Deuteranopes
Maille M, Crepy P. Les nouvelles normes visuelles en aéronautique militaire. Médecine Aéronautique Spatiale. 1990;XXIX:261–2
Introduction
Color use in aviation
access to information : first symbol, text, or sound.
PAPI (Precision Approach Path Indicator) is the more critical
Other are less problematic :
Parking lights
Taxiways
Regulatory lights of airplanes.
Introduction
Color is more and more present in cockpits,
"glass cockpits“ : LCD screens with electronic process of many instruments
of flights, whose display is multicolored.
Colors choice : free to the manufacturer
Located in different areas of confusion according to MacAdam ellipses
Introduction - rules
In France : Decree of 27 January 2005 and follow the regulations of EASA
- pass the Ishihara 24 plate test (first 15 plates identified without error or hesitation)
- ‘normal trichromat’ at the Nagel anomaloscope
- identification without mistake or hesitation of colored lights
in Beyne lantern(presented at 5 meters for 1 second with 3 minutes of arc aperture)
- matching range is 4 scale units or less to the Nagel anomaloscope
Normal
Color vision
Color vision
Safe
Introduction - rules
In France : Decree of 27 January 2005 and follow the regulations of EASA
- pass the Ishihara 24 plate test (first 15 plates identified without error or hesitation)
- ‘normal trichromat’ at the Nagel anomaloscope
- identification without mistake or hesitation of colored lights in Beyne lantern(presented at 5 meters for 1 second with 3 minutes of arc aperture)
- matching range is 4 scale units or less to the Nagel anomaloscope
Secondary tests in other countries
In UK : Holmes-Wright lantern or CAD test
In Germany : Anomaloscope
In USA : Farnsworth and Optec lanterns or Titmus vision test
In Canada : lantern test or Farnsworth D15
In New Zeland : Farnsworth and Holmes-Wright lanterns, Farnsworth D15 or CAD
test
Normal
Color vision
Color vision
Safe
Introduction
Lanterns : no more commercialized (only Fletcher-Evans CAM lantern)
Aim of the study
To assess the abilities of 8 color vision tests
for screening, qualification and quantification of red / green
hereditary deficiency,
to improve and to adapt the current color selection protocols.
Methods
INCLUSION
Color-deficient subjects:
addressed for a failure in
reading the Ishihara plates by
- military selection center
- or Aviation Medical
Examiner.
Color vision normal subjects : healthy volunteers.
EXCLUSION
BCVA less than 6/10.
Sunglasses or tinted contact
lenses.
Ophthalmologic pathology
(evolutionary or sequelar).
Prospective study
September 2016 to May 2017
CPEMPN of Percy hospital, in Clamart (France).
Methods - color vision test
Ishihara
Beyne lantern
Fletcher lantern
Farnsworth D15
Arrangements test Lanthony 15 Hue
Munsell 100 Hue
CAD (Colour Assessment and Diagnosis) test
Anomaloscope Nagel type
Methods - color vision test
Ishihara 38 plates
Out of order
at 70 cm of distance, at 45°
3 seconds for each plate
successful if the first 17 plates were viewed without error or hesitation.
Methods - color vision test
Ishihara
Beyne lantern
Fletcher lantern
Farnsworth D15
Arrangements test Lanthony 15 Hue
Munsell 100 Hue
CAD (Colour Assessment and Diagnosis) test
Anomaloscope Nagel type
Methods - color vision test
Beyne lantern type aviation
simple colored lights, in random order
low mesopic conditions, at 5 meters
any hesitation or false answer = an error
2 protocols without cited colors
1 s / 4’ : presentation 1 second with 4 minutes of arc aperture
1/25th s / 2 : presentation 1/25th second with 2 minutes of arc aperture
2 protocols with colors cited (red, green, blue, yellow-orange and off-white)
1 s / 3’ : presentation 1 second with 3 minutes of arc aperture
1 s / 3’ x 3 presentations (pass if no error on 2 of 3 presentation)
military
civilian
Methods - color vision test
Ishihara
Beyne lantern
Fletcher lantern
Farnsworth D15
Arrangements test Lanthony 15 Hue
Munsell 100 Hue
CAD (Colour Assessment and Diagnosis) test
Anomaloscope Nagel type
Methods - color vision test
Fletcher-Evans CAM lantern
two lights, vertically
6 meters
5 colors : 2 Red, 2 Green, 1 White
9 combinations
Informative phase : colors presented and cited 'red', 'green' and 'white ‘.
test phase : 0.9 minute of arc , 2 seconds
First round : pass if no error
Two more rounds if errors
Methods - color vision test
Ishihara
Beyne lantern
Fletcher lantern
Farnsworth D15
Arrangements test Lanthony 15 Hue
Munsell 100 Hue
CAD (Colour Assessment and Diagnosis) test
Anomaloscope Nagel type
Methods - color vision test
Arrangement tests
Farnsworth D15
▪ to classify the 16 pawns in a time of 3 minutes.
▪ successful if no confusion right (circular scheme)a straight between the pawns 7 and 15, a simple pawns inversions.
Desaturated Lanthony 15 Hue
▪ successful if less than 2 lines of confusion
Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue
▪ 2 minutes /box x 4
▪ axis of the deficiency
▪ severity score
Methods - color vision test
Ishihara
Beyne lantern
Fletcher lantern
Farnsworth D15
Arrangements test Lanthony 15 Hue
Munsell 100 Hue
CAD (Colour Assessment and Diagnosis) test
Anomaloscope Nagel type
Methods - color vision test
The CAD Test (Colour Assessment and Diagnosis)
Mesopic condition at 1.40 meter in front of the viewing screen,
3 steps
'learning mode’ : check the test understanding.
'fast screening’ : identify a large part of the healthy subjects.
‘definitive CAD’ : determine the chromatic sensitivity of the subject present for each wavelength stimuli of varying intensity.
determines the axis and severity according to a score (RG for the Red-Green axis and YB for blue-yellow axis)
Ability according to UK threshold : RG < 6 SN for protans and RG< 12 SN for deutans
Healthy subjects : score < 2 SN
Methods - color vision test
Ishihara
Beyne lantern
Fletcher lanter
Farnsworth D15
Arrangements test Lanthony 15 Hue
Munsell 100 Hue
CAD (Colour Assessment and Diagnosis) test
Anomaloscope Nagel type
Methods - color vision test
The anomaloscope IF2, Tomey
Rayleigh equation,
on the dominant eye in mesopic conditions
2 modes : Automatic or Manual
identifies the deficiency axis, differentiates anomalous trichromats from
dichromats, or class the subject in normal color vision
matching range severity
Safe : if matching range less than 4 units at the Nagel anomaloscope
Methods
For each test, evaluation of :
▪ Sensibility, Specificity, Positive and negative predictive values
▪ Application to aeronautic : Total number and success ratio for class 1 ability
▪ Severity assessing : ROC curves for dichromatism diagnosis
for CAD test and 100 Hue
2 groups : CVD : color vision deficient
CVN : color vision normal
Results
55 subjects
32 color vision deficient subjects (CVD). 3 were excluded (missing
results)
23 color vision normal subjects (CVN).
29 VCD 23 VCN p
23 years ± 6.09 26 ± 6.1 years p = 0.075
0 woman 9 women p = 0.015
- 11 deuteranomalous trichromats (37.9%)
- 7 protanomalous trichromats (24.1%)
- 6 protanopes (20.69%)
- 5 deuteranopes (17.24%)
Results
Detection of
color-deficiency
tests power
Se Sp PPV NPV
ISHIHARA 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.96
FARNSWORTH D15 0.58 1.00 1.00 0.64
LANTHONY HUE desaturated 0.79 1.00 1.00 0.79
MUNSELL 100 HUE 0.79 0.96 0.96 0.79
BEYNE Lantern
1s / 4' 0.79 0.96 0.96 0.79
1/25th s 2' 0.97 0.57 0.76 0.93
1s / 3' 0.76 0.96 0.96 0.76
1 s 3' x 3 series 0.69 1.00 1.00 0.72
FLETCHER Lantern 1 presentation 1.00 0.78 0.85 1.00
2 retests 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.96
CAD test 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ANOMALOSCOPE Automatic 0.97 0.96 0.97 0.96
Manual 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Results
Total number and success ratio for a class 1 ability for CVD
Test Deuteranomalous
trichromats Deuteranopes
Protanomalous
trichromats Protanopes
All
n = 11 in % n = 5 in % n = 7 in % n = 6 in % n=29 in %
ISHIHARA 1 9.09 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 3.44
FARSNWORTH D15 5 45.45 0 0.00 5 71.42 2 33.33 12 41.38
LANTHONY D15 4 36.36 0 0.00 2 28.57 0 0.00 6 20.69
MUNSELL 100HUE 3 27.27 0 0.00 2 28.57 1 16.67 6 20.69
Beyne lantern
1s / 4' 5 45.45 0 0.00 1 14.29 0 0.00 6 20.69
1/25th s / 2' 1 9.09 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 3.44
1s / 3' 3 27.27 1 20.00 2 28.57 1 16.67 7 24.14
1s / 3' x 3 6 50.00 0 0.00 2 28.57 1 16.67 9 31.03
Fletcher
lantern
1 present. 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
2 retests 1 9.09 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 3.44
CAD test 2 18.18 0 0.00 1 14.29 0 0.00 3 10.34
ANOMALOSCOPE 4 36.36 0 0.00 2 28.57 0 0.00 6 20.69
Results
Total number and success ratio for a class 1 ability for CVD
Test Deuteranomalous
trichromats Deuteranopes
Protanomalous
trichromats Protanopes
All
n = 11 in % n = 5 in % n = 7 in % n = 6 in % n=29 in %
ISHIHARA 1 9.09 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 3.44
FARSNWORTH D15 5 45.45 0 0.00 5 71.42 2 33.33 12 41.38
LANTHONY D15 4 36.36 0 0.00 2 28.57 0 0.00 6 20.69
MUNSELL 100HUE 3 27.27 0 0.00 2 28.57 1 16.67 6 20.69
Beyne lantern
1s / 4' 5 45.45 0 0.00 1 14.29 0 0.00 6 20.69
1/25th s / 2' 1 9.09 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 3.44
1s / 3' 3 27.27 1 20.00 2 28.57 1 16.67 7 24.14
1s / 3' x 3 6 50.00 0 0.00 2 28.57 1 16.67 9 31.03
Fletcher
lantern
1 present. 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
2 retests 1 9.09 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 3.44
CAD test 2 18.18 0 0.00 1 14.29 0 0.00 3 10.34
ANOMALOSCOPE 4 36.36 0 0.00 2 28.57 0 0.00 6 20.69
Results
CVDIshihara D15
15HUE
Lanthony.
100
HUE
BEYNE lantern FLETCHER lanternCAD
testAnomal.
1/4 1/25th 2 1/3 3 tests 1 test 2 retests
1 fail fail fail fail fail fail fail PASS fail fail fail fail
2 fail PASS PASS fail fail fail fail Fail fail fail PASS PASS
4 fail PASS PASS fail fail fail PASS PASS fail fail fail PASS
5 fail PASS fail fail fail fail fail fail fail fail fail fail
6 fail PASS fail fail fail fail fail fail fail fail fail fail
7 fail fail fail fail fail fail PASS PASS fail fail fail fail
11 fail fail fail fail fail fail PASS fail fail fail fail fail
14 fail fail fail fail PASS fail fail fail fail fail fail PASS
15 fail PASS fail fail PASS fail fail fail fail fail fail fail
16 fail fail fail fail fail fail fail PASS fail fail fail fail
17 fail PASS fail fail fail fail fail fail fail fail fail fail
20 fail PASS PASS fail fail fail fail PASS fail fail PASS fail
22 fail fail fail PASS fail fail fail fail fail fail fail fail
24 fail PASS PASS fail PASS PASS PASS PASS fail fail fail PASS
25 fail fail fail fail fail fail PASS PASS fail fail fail fail
26 fail PASS fail PASS fail fail PASS PASS fail fail fail fail
27 fail fail fail fail PASS fail fail fail fail fail fail fail
29 fail PASS fail PASS PASS fail fail fail fail fail fail PASS
30 fail PASS PASS PASS fail fail fail PASS fail PASS PASS PASS
31 fail fail PASS PASS fail fail fail fail fail fail fail fail
Results
Deficit quantification
CAD test100 Hue : difference
between achieved score and physiologic score
100 Hue : achieved score
Best cut-off:- RG > 18,5 for CAD test
- Score difference > 22
- Score > 112 for 100 Hue
AUC:- 0,98 [0,94 ; 1,01] for CAD test
- 0,65 [0,47 ; 0,83] for score
difference
- 0,69 [0,52 ; 0,86]for 100 Hue
Discussion
Walsh in 2016 , USA
65 CVD subjects and 68 CVN subjects of US Army.
Our results : similar except a better diagnostic efficiency of the CAD test.
good efficiency of the computerized tests CCT and CAD
operator-independent and randomized patterns
Test Sensitivity Specificity
CAD test 0.86 0.85 to 1.00
Farnsworth D15 0.35 1.00
FALANT 0.92 to 0.86 0.96
3 presentations 0.83 to 0.85 0.97 to 0.99
PIPIC 0.98 0.96 to 1.0
Walsh DV, Robinson J, Jurek GM, Capó-Aponte JE, Riggs DW, Temme LA. A Performance Comparison of Color Vision Tests for Military Screening. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2016 Apr;87(4):382–7.
Discussion
Squire et al. in 2005, UK
3 lanterns (Beyne, Spectrolux, and Holmes-Wright)
and Nagel anomaloscope.
55 CVD subjects and 24 CVN subjects.
all dichromats failed the 4 tests.
pass one secondary test : not guaranteed to pass the other tests
Tests authorized by the EASA standards : high variability and
inconsistency of their results.
Squire TJ, Rodriguez-Carmona M, Evans ADB, Barbur JL. Color vision tests for aviation: comparison of the anomaloscope and three lantern types. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 May;76(5):421–9.
Discussion
British CAA, 2006
117 CVD
Ability of PAPI lights recognition and CAD test results
No subject who pass CAD test failed to PAPI simulator.
(pass : RG < 6 SN for protan or RG < 12 SN for deutan)
CAD test : pass in 36.1 % of deuteranomalous trichromats
29.8% of protanomalous trichromats
In our study : only 18.2% deuteranomalous trichromats
14.3% protanomalous trichromats
Barbur JL, Rodriguez-Carmona M, Evans S, Milburn N. Minimum Colour Vision Requirements for Professionnal Flight Crew. Recommendations for a new colour vision standards. Safety Regulation Group. Civil Aviation Authority; 2009.
Discussion
Fletcher in 2005
▪ Similar to Holmes-Wright lantern : 2 lights with a 0.9 minute arc aperture. Colors used : slight differences in the CIE diagram.
▪ 9 / 71 normal trichromats : mistakes in first pass.
▪ 18 color-deficient subjects : all failed.
Fletcher-Evans CAM lantern : very sensitive. good test for clinical diagnosis, not for chromatic selection.
Birch in 2008
▪ Holmes-Wright lantern type A
▪ 125 color-deficient subjects: 10 subjects (9%) were able to pilot
Nevertheless, Fletcher lantern not comparable to the Holmes-Wright lantern (passing 9 to 30% of CVD)
- Fletcher R. The Fletcher CAM lantern colour vision test. Optom Today. 2005 Jul;(29):24–6. - Birch J. Performance of colour-deficient people on the Holmes-Wright lantern (type A): consistency of occupational colour vision standards in aviation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 May;28(3):253–8.
Discussion
Professional selection specificity
Candidates try to minimize their color-vision deficit / learn Ishihara consider any hesitation / mistake as failure.
testing protocol should be strictly respected and examiners must be
trained,
▪ that can be an impediment to the use of anomaloscope
▪ In some cases, automatic mode may fail to categorize the candidate.
Discussion
Test duration is to take in account in a screening context.
Ishihara album : 2 minutes
Beyne lantern : 1 mn, and Fletcher-Evans CAM lantern : 5 mn
Both test of D15 : 2 - 3 mn, 100 Hue : 15 mn
Anomaloscope with both automatic and manual mode : 20 mn
CAD test : < 5 mn if "Fast screening" is successful.
In our study, 6 CVN (26%) had “Definitive CAD” : 8 mn for
red/green (3-4 mn for blue / yellow if necessary).
Discussion
CAD test
Advantages
▪ Can’t be learn
▪ Reproducible
▪ Red / green and yellow / blue axis
▪ 16 colors
▪ Quantitative test
Lanterns
Advantages
▪ Quick
▪ Easy
▪ Less expensive
▪ Ergonomic test
Conclusion
Many tests are used for pilots ability. Their results are discordant
lanterns are no more commercialized.
CAD test and anomaloscope : most accurate in our study
Recent increase of colored signals in new generation cockpits.
Multitude of color amount.
The acceptable color-deficiency for a pilot to be safe is difficult to
determine, as well as the risk of not detected blue-yellow
deficiency.
Thank you for your
attention
Discussion
In conclusion
▪ Ishihara plates : excellent screening test for red / green deficiency.
▪ Farnsworth D15 : quick and easy but some dichromats subjects can pass this test.
▪ Lanthony 15 Hue test : ability of 20% and seems suitable for use in professional
selection.
▪ Munsell 100 Hue : too long
▪ Fletcher-Evans CAM lantern : too restrictive
▪ Beyne lantern : simple and quick to use, but some dichromats pass.
▪ Anomaloscope : qualify and quantify the deficiency
requires a strong experience of the examiner.
▪ CAD test : quantitative test , yellow/blue and red/green
thresholds used by the British CAA seem to be more restrictive
More expensive
Results
Assessment of
the axis of the color-deficiency
ANOMALOSCOPE Diagnosis ISHIHARA D15
LANTHONY
15HUE 100 HUE CAD
deutan 15 11 9 12 16
all CVD protan 9 6 12 6 13
n = 29 not defined 5 12 8 11 0
Deuteranomalous deutan 10 6 5 6 11
Trichromats protan 0 0 2 0 0
n = 11 not defined 1 5 4 5 0
deutan 5 5 4 5 5
Deuteranopes protan 0 0 0 0 0
n = 5 not defined 0 0 1 0 0
Protanomalous deutan 0 0 0 1 0
Trichromats protan 4 2 4 2 7
n = 7 not defined 3 5 3 4 0
deutan 0 0 0 1 0
Protanopes Protan 5 4 6 4 6
n = 6 not defined 1 2 0 2 0