Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A New Instrument for Single Particle
Analysis:
The Coupling of ATOFMS and LIBSErin E. McDuffie
40x103
30
20
10
0
ATOF
MS-L
IBS
Inte
nsity
800700600500400300200Wavelength (nm)
Atomic Emission
Pulsed Laser Beam
Sample
Dr. Deborah Gross’s LabCarleton College - Northfield, MN
• All research focuses on aerosol analysis– Size– Chemical composition
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Carleton_College_Aerial.jpg
• Recent Projects:– Particle source study
(Milwaukee)– Experimental case study
of the indoor atmosphere– Improving
instrumentation
Aerosol Time-of-Flight
Mass Spectrometer
http://www.tsi.com/uploadedFiles/Product_Information/Literature/Spec_Sheets/3800SeriesPN1933798RevD.pdf
http://styleanderror.co.uk/2011/03/basel-nouveau-hippys/gromit/
Particle
Composition
Temporal
Trends
TSI 3800
ATOFMS
Aerodynamic
Size
How We Use ATOFMS
Courtesy of Deborah Gross, Carleton College
ParticleInlet
ParticleSizing
ParticleComposition
+ -+ -
2/ tzm µ
Inte
nsity
2/ tzm µ
Inte
nsity
Each particle, sampled in real time, generatessize and 2 mass spectra
start 0
200
100300µsstop
0
200
100300µs
0
200
100300µs
TSI 3800
ATOFMSShown with
nozzle inlet.
The ATOFMS Instrument
Nd:YAG
Laser
Pressure Drop
760 Torr
10-2 Torr
10-7 Torr
Velocity is Inversely Proportional to Particle Size
Velocity is Inversely Proportional to Ion Mass
Electric Field
10-5 Torr
2
21mvKE =
Courtesy of Deborah Gross, Carleton College
ParticleInlet
ParticleSizing
ParticleComposition
+ -+ -
2/ tzm µ
Inte
nsity
2/ tzm µ
Inte
nsity
start 0
200
100300µsstop
0
200
100300µs
0
200
100300µs
TSI 3800
ATOFMSShown with
nozzle inlet.
The ATOFMS Instrument
Courtesy of Deborah Gross, Carleton College
Advantages of ATOFMS
• Continuous Real-Time Analysis– Fast sampling rate – Little-to-no sample preparation– Sample storage or transport prior to analysis
is not required• Single Particle Analysis
– Size – Composition
• Transportable!
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Intensity
-250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250m/z
1.0x106
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
dN/d
logD
a
6 80.1
2 4 6 81
2 4 6 810
Aerodynamic Diameter (Da)
ATOFMS Data
Mass Spectra of a Single Particle Histogram of 529,161 Particles
Pb+
NO2-
HSO4-
K+
C2-
NO3-
C3+Na+
C3-
C+
O-
Data from Milwaukee particle source study, Summer 2010Courtesy of Deborah Gross, Carleton College
How Much?
http://fax-21.blogspot.com/2011/02/gromit-award.html
•Filter Analysis/Extractions
•Particle Into Liquid Samples (PILS)
•Particulate Nitrate/Sulfate Monitors
•EC/OC Monitors
•Aethalometer
•Raman Spectroscopy
•Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS)
Quantitative Analytical Aerosol
Analysis Techniques
Laser Induced Breakdown
Spectroscopy (LIBS)LIBS uses a laser induced microplasma to excite the atomic emissions of a sample in order to determine its composition
http://libs.lanl.gov/ChemCam.html
http://energy.lbl.gov/aet/_archives/aet/laser-induced.html
Advantages:
• Fast Sampling Rate
• No Sample Preparation
• Remote Sensing Capabilities
Atomic Emission
Pulsed Laser Beam
Sample
LIBS Applications and Implementations
Hahn, D. W.; Omenetto, N. Applied Spectroscopy, 2012, 66, 347-419
Atomic Emission
Principles of Operation
1) Ablation – the laser vaporizes the surface layer of the sample and ionizes a fraction of the material
2) Plasma Generation– The ions in this gaseous material forms the plasma, which heats and expands quickly
3) Excitation – Collisional excitation promotes the electronic excitation of the remaining neutral species in the plasma
4) Emission – as the plasma cools: • Atomic Emission- excited electrons in
the neutral species return to their ground state
• Ionic Emission- free electrons in the plasma recombine with ions Ground
Excited states
Emission
Excitation
++
_+_ +
_+
_+ __
Pulsed Laser Beam
Sample
E
Conventional LIBS Instrument Design
§ Line position provides species identification
§ Line intensity provides species concentration (with calibrations)
F. Ferioli and S.G. Buckley, �Measurements of Hydrocarbons using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy,� Combustion and Flame.
Detector
Atomic Emission Spectrum of Stainless Steel
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Wavelength (nm)
Inte
nsity O
H
Ni, Fe, Si, Mn, Cr
Si SiN
.
Pulsedlaser
Laser-inducedplasma
Atomicemissioncollection
Spectrometer
Fiberoptic
.
ParticleInlet
ParticleSizing
ParticleComposition
+ -+ -
start 0
200
100300µs
0
200
100300µsstop
0
200
100300µs
TSI 3800
ATOFMSShown with
nozzle inlet.
The ATOFMS Instrument
LIBS
ATOFMS + LIBS!
Creating an ATOFMS-LIBS
Stage 1:LIBS Addition Development
Stage 2:Troubleshooting...
http://nz.entertainment.yahoo.com/news/article/-/14190745/wallaces-pal-gromit-was-once-a-cat-creator-says/
Developement of a New Single-Particle Research Instrument: The Coupling of ATOFMS and LIBS
Erin McDuffie and Deborah GrossDepartment of Chemistry, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057
INTRODUCTION
Nd:YAG Laser
The TSI Aerosol Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer (3800 ATOFMS) (Figure 1) is a single-particle mass spectrometer designed to measure the aerodynamic size and composition of a polydisperse aerosol in real time. Particles are sampled through a nozzle and accelerated to a velocity dependent on their aerodynamic size. This velocity is determined by measuring the time between light pulses due to scattering as the particle crosses two orthogonal continuous diode laser beams (532 nm). The distance between the lasers is known precisely, so the time can be converted into a velocity. The velocity is then converted into an aerodynamic diameter (Da) by application of a calibration equation developed by measuring the velocity of particles of known Da. The velocity is used to track the particle as it enters the source region of the bipolar time-of-flight mass spectrometer. A pulsed Nd:YAG laser (266 nm) is fired such that the contents of the particle are desorbed and ionized. The ions are introduced into the flight tubes, and two mass spectra are obtained from each sized particle, in addition to particle size information. This process should also be inducing atomic emission, which can be captured with a LIBS instrument, provided they can be integrated.
The pysical components of a conventional LIBS instrument include: - Ablation source (laser of the required energy) - Sample - Light collection and detection systemThese components integrate well with an ATOFMS instrument because ATOFMS already has an ablation source, which allows for the addition of a detection system outside the instrument with minimal ATOFMS alterations. Since the ATOFMS parameters are fixed, key features of the LIBS addition must vary from a conventional LIBS instrument design. The following sections suggest that these differences still allow for the compatibility of LIBS with ATOFMS.
LIBS uses a laser induced microplasma to excite the atomic emission of a sample in order to determine its chemical composition. Previous single-particle analysis studies have shown that LIBS can quantitatively determine the composition of species in individual aerosol particles.
Principles of Operation1:
1) Ablation - The laser vaporizes the surface layer of the sample and ionizes a fraction of the material.
2) Plasma Generation - The ions in the gaseous material form a plasma, which heats and expands quickly.
3) Excitation - Collisional excitation promotes the electronic excitation of the remaining neutral species in the plasma.
4) Emission - As the plasma cools:- Atomic Emision - excited electrons in the neutral species return to their ground state.- Ionic Emission - free electrons in the plasma recombine with the ions. The emission wavelengths are characteristic for each element.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The understanding and analysis of health and environmental effects of atmospheric particulate matter requires measurements that can provide detailed information about particle composition. An Aerosol Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer (ATOFMS) is used for the semi-quantitative analysis of the composition of individual atmospheric particles upon laser-induced desorption and ionization. Integration of the spectroscopic technique of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS), in which light is emitted by the elemental components of the particle upon irradiation with a laser, should increase the quantitative data provided by this instrument. Besides providing quantitative data, other advantages to LIBS as a spectroscopic technique are that it requires little to no sample preparation prior to analysis, has a fast sampling rate, and remote sensing capabilities. Due to the similarities between both spectroscopic techniques, integration of the two should be straightforward and requires only minor modifications to the ATOFMS.
References:
Ablation Environment
The required energy for particle ablation is a photon density of ~5 J/cm2 per laser pulse4. Although LIBS is often performed with a Nd:YAG laser emitting a higher pulse energy than the ATOFMS laser, the required photon density per pulse can still be met in the ATOFMS-LIBS setup. To meet this energy threshold, the ODVHU�EHDP��DW�WKH�SRLQW�RI�SDUWLFOH�DEODWLRQ��UHTXLUHV�D�EHDP�UDGLXV�RI�DW�PRVW����ȝP��7KLV�UHTXLUHG�UDGLXV�was used in the equations below to determine the focusing distance of the laser beam in order to generate the required ablation energy (beam radius) in the center of the flight tubes where the particles are sampled.
Literature has shown that single particle LIBS has sucessfully provided quantititative data in low pressure environments similar to the one found in ATOFMS2,3. The plasma generation can be aided by a gaseuos atmospheric environment but is not necessary for LIBS. The presence of an electric field in the sampling region is unlike other LIBS applications. It is possible that when the particle is ablated, the ions will be drawn into the flight tubes before they can create a plasma and emit characteristic radiation. The following calculation was done using the voltages of the ATOFMS ion source in order to determine how long ions will be availbe for LIBS sampling.
Light collection occurs at the bottom of ATOFMS, 90 degrees to the axis of the ablation laser beam. An optical fiber with a 25 degree field of view collects the light which travels to the detector where it is analyzed. In order to withstand the required pressure gradient a window and optical fiber mount were built and installed at the bottom of the ATOFMS between the two source plates (Figure 4). This swivel mount seen in the figure allows for the optical fiber to be held in place against this window while its angle of collection can be changed by up to 20 degrees. Initial spectra of stationary light sources have confirmed the dependence of spectral intensity on fiber optic collection angle.
LIBS and ATOFMS have unique timing requirments that have to be combined by syncing aspects of their electrical timing cicuits. LabView was used to write a program that incorporates the two and that allows the user to set the LIBS electronic parameters while maintaining single particle analysis (primary advantage of ATOFMS). The LIBS addition was physically incorporated using a 5V trigger pulse sent from the Nd:YAG laser while the origianl ATOFMS timing circuit was left unaltered. This pulse (Lamp Sync in Figure 6) triggers the UV-VIS VSHFWURPHWHU�WR�EHJLQ�WKH�GDWD�DFTXLVLWLRQ�SURFHVV����ȝV�EHIRUH�WKH�ODVHU�SXOVH�ablates the particle. Once triggered, the LIBS detector is programed to aquire light IRU�����ȝV��ZKLFK�DOORZV�IRU�FROOHFWLRQ�RI�DQ\�SRVVLEOH�DWRPLF�HPLVVLRQ�
The funding for this project was provided by Carleton College. We thank Markus Gaelli and Gregg Lithgow at TSI for their assistance. We also thank Mark Zach for his consultation and building of the swivel mount.
1) Hahn, D. W.; Omenetto, N. Applied Spectroscopy. 2012. 64(12), 335-366. 2) Lithgow, G. A.; Robinson, A. L.; Buckley, S. G. Atmospheric Environment. 2004. 38, 3319-3328.3) Effenberger, A. J.; Scott, J. R. Sensors. 2010, 10(5), 4907-49254) Rieger, G. W.; Taschuk, M.; Tsui, Y. Y.; Fedosejevs, R. Spectrochimica Acta Part B. 2003. 58, 497-510. 851-864.
Spectrometer
LASER-INDUCED BREAKDOWN SPECTROSCOPY (LIBS)
AEROSOL TIME-OF-FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY (ATOFMS)
Although evidence above supports the sucessful integration of ATOFMS and LIBS, the extent to which the four operational principles of LIBS (see above) hold in an electric field and at low pressures requires the following future experiments.
Electric Field - ATOFMS-LIBS will sample while the ATOFMS voltages are turned off to allow for the ionic species to remain in the light collection region instead of traveling into the flight tubes
Low Pressures - ATOFMS-LIBS will sample while the mass spectrometry region is vented to allow for particle ablation in a gaseous environment near 1atm pressure instead of in a vaccum.
RESOLUTION OF UNCERTAINTIES
Parameter Conventional LIBS ATOFMS-LIBS
Fiber optic ���ȝP���������������������������ȝP��Distance <15mm 80mm Position fixed position window, swivel
Parameter Conventional LIBS ATOFMS-LIBS
Wavelength 266 -1064 nm 266nmEnergy 40-100mJ/pulse ~1mJ/pulse
SYNCING ATOFMS AND LIBS
Ground
Excited statesE
Excitation Emission
Atomic Emission
Pulsed Laser
Beam
Sample
Figure 2. LIBS Basic Principles
���ȝV
8ns
Ionic Emission136-140ȝV
Atomic Emission~136-190ȝV
Molecular Recombination138-240ȝV
Time = 0
Nd:YAG Laser Pulse
Data Collection
Plasma Evolution
Lamp SyncTrigger Pulse
Particle AblationTime = 136ȝV
Mass Spectra Collection~336ȝV
LIBS Data Collection~1340ȝV
S S
Not to ScaleFigure 6. ATOFMS and LIBS Timelines
Figure 4. Optical Fiber Swivel Mount
INCORPORATING A LIBS INSTRUMENT INTO ATOFMS:
VqPE *
2
2
1 mvKE
Figure 5. Example Calculations of Particle Speed for Chloride Ion
Chloride ion is one of the smaller/faster ions found in aerosols and therefore can be used to GHWHUPLQH�WKH�XSSHU�OLPLW�RI�WKH�VSHHG�RI�VDPSOHG�LRQV�������FP�ȝV��DQG�WKH�PLQLPXP�WLPH�WKH\�ZLOO�EH�DYDLODEOH�GXULQJ�/,%6�VDPSOLQJ��URXJKO\����ȝV���)RU�FRPSDULVRQ��OHDG�LRQ�
�PROHFXODU�ZHLJKW����J�PRO��ZLOO�KDYH�D�VDPSOLQJ�WLPH�RI����ȝV��$V�VHHQ�LQ�)LJXUH����ERWK�species will be present during the short time atmoic emission is collected.
When the laser beam ionizes a particle, it becomes charged and finds itself in an electric field between two source plates with a potential energy based on its charge (Equation 1).
potential energy (J) = ion charge (coulombs) * voltage (volts)= 1.602x10-19C * 2318V
= 3.74x10-16 J for Cl-
This potential energy is converted into kinetic energy based on the ions mass (Equation 2).
kinetic energy (J) = 1/2 * ion mass (kg) * velocity2 (m/s) 3.74x10-16 J = 0.5(5.87x10-26kg) * v2
velocity = 112430m/s for Cl-
1)
2)
Parameter Conventional LIBS ATOFMS-LIBS
Atmospheric Gaseuos VacuumComposition (nitrogen flow)
*Pressure 760 Torr (1 atm) 1x10-7 Torr
*Electric Field None Strong
Lf W
fW*
*
SO
)*
*(1)(
2f
fR WzWzW
SO
�
Ȝ �ZDYHOHQJWK�RI�ODVHU�EHDP�����QP�f = focal length (100mm)z = distance from the focal point
WL = radius the entering beamWR(z) = radius of beam at a distance of zWf = radius of beam at the focal point from the focal point
Figure 3. Laser Beam Energy Calculations
For ATOFMS-LIBS: Wf = 7ȝP��:R�]�� ����ȝP��]� �����PP�
This distance, beam readius, and energy are attainable with the current ATOFMS optics
Optical Fiber
Figure 1. TSI 3800 Aerosol Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometer (ATOFMS)
with LIBS Addition
Aerosol In
Diode-pumped Solid
State Lasers (532nm)
(Sizing Lasers)
Reflectron
(”Ion Mirror”)
Flight Tube
Ultraviolet Laser (266nm)
(Desorption/Ionization Laser)
Microchannel Plate
Ion Detectors
Ellipsoidal Mirrors
Particle
Sizing
Region
Mass
Spectrometry
Region
+Ions -Ions
Photo Multiplier
Tubes (PMT)
Particle
Sampling
Region
LIBS Data
Collection
and Analysis
RegionSpectrometer
Light Collection and DectectionGeneral Physical Components
1) Laser: Nd:YAG
2) Sample: Aerosols
3) Collection/Detection System:- Fiber: 400μm- Spectrometer: OO USB2000+- LIBS-ATOFMS Connection:
Window / Fiber Swivel Mount
http://www.oceanoptics.com/Products/usb2000.asp
LIBS Addition Development - Troubleshooting
Data Collection
• Program Requirements1) Spectrometer Control2) Single particle analysis
http://www.ni.com/labview/whatis/
LIBS Addition Development - Troubleshooting
Background Scans
Sync Acquisition to ATOFMS
Timing System
Tune Parameters
Front Panel Control
Save Data
LIBS Addition Development - Troubleshooting
LIBS-ATOFMS: Implementation
Spectrometer/Detector
Lab View Program
Window Into ATOFMS
Fiber Optic
1. Physical Components2. Data Collection/Analysis
Physical Instrument Development - Troubleshooting
Initial Results
• Functional Detection System!
Atomic Emission Spectrum of FeCl3-HNO3
Solution
-1000
4000
9000
14000
19000
24000
29000
34000
39000
200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Wavelength (nm)
Inte
nsity
Nd:YAG Laser
532nm
266nm
LIBS Addition Development - Troubleshooting
Where is the Signal?Comparison of Parameters
ATOFMS-LIBS
Q-Switched Nd:YAG –266nm
~1mJ/pulse
Negligible Atmospheric Composition
1x10-7 Torr
Strong
OO USB 2000+
~1 μm aerosol
Conventional LIBS
Q-Switched Nd:YAG-1064nm
40-100mJ/pulse
Gaseous Atmospheric Composition
760 Torr (1 atm)
None
High Resolution Detector
Large, solid surface
Parameters
Laser Type
Laser Pulse Energy
Ablation Environment
Ablation Pressure
Electric Field
Spectrometer
Sample Type
LIBS Addition Development - Troubleshooting
LIBS Under Similar Conditions
• Ambient Aerosol Analysis• Low laser energy
– ~1μJ pulses• Low pressure
– <10-6 Torr• Negligible Gaseous
Environment – reduced plasma-
surrounding interactions
Effenberger, A. J.; Scott, J. R. Sensors. 2010, 10(5), 4907-4925
Comparison of LIBS spectra of Si at atmospheric and 10-6 Torr
LIBS Addition Development - Troubleshooting
ATOFMS-LIBS
Q-Switched Nd:YAG –266nm
~1mJ/pulse
Negligible Atmospheric Composition
1x10-7 Torr
Strong
OO USB 2000+
~1 μm aerosol
Conventional LIBS
Q-Switched Nd:YAG-1064nm
40-100mJ/pulse
Gaseous Atmospheric Composition
760 Torr (1 atm)
None
High Resolution Detector
Large, solid surface
Parameters
Laser Type
Laser Pulse Energy
Ablation Environment
Ablation Pressure
Electric Field
Spectrometer
Sample Type
LIBS Addition Development - Troubleshooting
Types of Experiments
• Laser energy/ position– Position laser beam’s
focal point to particle path• Fiber position
– Light collection angle• Detection integration time• Voltages off
– Remove electric field• Sample
– Aerosol vs solid aluminum target
Atomic Emission Spectrum of FeCl3-HNO3
Solution
-1000
4000
9000
14000
19000
24000
29000
34000
39000
200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Wavelength (nm)
Inte
nsity
LIBS Addition Development - Troubleshooting
Sample Change
• From aerosols to aluminum
Top-Down View of ATOFMS Flight Tubes
Laser
LIBS Addition Development - Troubleshooting
Results
LIBS Addition Development - Troubleshooting
Results
LIBS Addition Development - Troubleshooting
Al
N, H
ATOFMS-LIBS
Q-Switched Nd:YAG –266nm
~1mJ/pulse
Negligible Atmospheric Composition
1x10-7 Torr
Strong
OO USB 2000+
~1 μm aerosol
Conventional LIBS
Q-Switched Nd:YAG-1064nm
40-100mJ/pulse
Gaseous Atmospheric Composition
760 Torr (1 atm)
None
High Resolution Detector
Large, solid surface
Parameters
Laser Type
Laser Pulse Energy
Ablation Environment
Ablation Pressure
Electric Field
Spectrometer
Sample Type
LIBS Addition Development - Troubleshooting
Remaining Uncertainties
Atomic Emission Spectrum of Stainless Steel
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Wavelength (nm)In
tens
ity O
H
Ni, Fe, Si, Mn, Cr
Si SiN
Now that we have obtained signal...• Grant for new Detector• Signal Optimization and Calibration• Write a data analysis program
A Work In Progress:
The Future of ATOFMS-LIBS
New Instrument!!
+
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Intensity
-250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250m/z
Mass Spectrum of a Single Particle
!
Acknowledgements
• Deborah Gross• Carleton College Faculty
– Including Steve Drew and Mark Zach• Markus Gälli and Gregg Lithgow at TSI• Carleton College Department of Chemistry