Upload
truongthien
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A NATIONAL ANALYSIS OF DIVERSITY
IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
FACULTIES AT RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES
ByDr. Donna J. Nelson and Diana C. Rogers
The first national and most comprehensive analysis todate of tenured and tenure track faculty in the “top 50”departments of science and engineering disciplines showsthat females and minorities are significantly underrepre-sented.
• There are few tenured and tenure-track women facul-ty in these departments in research universities, eventhough a growing number of women are completingtheir PhDs. Qualified women are not going to scienceand engineering departments. In some engineeringdisciplines, there is a better match between the repre-sentation of females in PhD attainment versus the fac-ulty, but these disciplines are the ones with very lowpercentages of females in PhD attainment.
• Underrepresented minority (URM) women faculty arealmost nonexistent in science and engineering depart-ments at research universities. In the “top 50” com-puter science departments, there are no Black,Hispanic, or Native American tenured or tenure trackwomen faculty.
• The percentage of women in BS attainment in scienceand engineering continues to increase, but they arelikely to find themselves without the female facultyneeded for optimal role models
• There are few female full professors in science and engi-neering; the percentage of women among full profes-sors ranges from 3% to 15%. In all but one disciplinesurveyed, the highest percentage of female faculty is atthe level of assistant professor.
• In most science disciplines studied, the percentage ofwomen among recent PhD recipients is much higherthan their percentage among assistant professors, thetypical rank of recently hired faculty. Even in disci-plines where women outnumber men earning PhDs,the percentage of assistant professors who are Whitemale is greater than females. For example, in the bio-logical sciences, 44.7% of the PhDs between 1993 and2002 were women; while in 2002, they accounted foronly 30.2% of the assistant professors.
In some disciplines, it is likely that a woman can get abachelor of science without being taught by a female pro-fessor in that discipline; it is also possible for a woman toget a PhD in science or engineering without havingaccess to a woman faculty member in her field.
The data demonstrate that while the representation offemales in science and engineering PhD attainment hassignificantly increased in recent years, the correspondingfaculties are still overwhelmingly dominated by Whitemen.
There is a drastically disproportionate number of maleprofessors as role models for male students. For example,in 2000, 48.2% of the students graduating with a BS inmath were women, but in 2002, only 8.3% of the facul-ty was female.
A cycle is perpetuated. Women are less likely to enterand remain in science and engineering when they lackmentors and role models. In most science disciplines, thepercentage of women among faculty recently hired is notcomparable to that of recent women PhDs. This resultsin fewer female faculty to act as role models for femaleundergraduates and graduate students. Female studentsobserve this in the course of sampling the environment.When female professors are not hired, treated fairly, andretained, female students perceive that they will be treat-ed similarly. This dissuades them from persisting in thatdiscipline.
This is not to say that only women can mentor womenand girls. In the absence of female professors, male pro-fessors have been mentoring female students for decades.Because of the dearth of female professors and the impactthis has on female student perceptions, the male facultyshould (1) actively encourage female students to enterscience and engineering and offer to become their men-tors and (2) insure that the environment for the fewfemale professors currently in science and engineering isone which female students will perceive as appealing. Inthe end, the presence, treatment, and fate of female pro-fessors will be most relevant to the lives, family responsi-bilities, and careers of typical female students and thechoices and obstacles they will face.
A NATIONAL ANALYSIS OF DIVERSITY IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FACULTIES AT RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
“Progress for female and minority faculty at researchuniversities, produced from past attempted solutionscombined, has been too slow. If significant progress is tobe made within the next couple of decades, new andtotally different approaches to solving problems facingwomen and minority faculty will be needed.”
Dr. Donna J. Nelson
Introduction
The first determination of the representation of bothfemales and minorities among tenured and tenure trackfaculties of science and engineering departments atresearch universities reveals that both are underrepresent-ed, in some cases, at levels far below that expected.Females are primarily in the lower professorial rankings,and underrepresented minority female professors arealmost nonexistent. Due to the close relationshipbetween faculty and students, this raises other concerns,which are detailed in this report.
Comparison with recent BS attainment by females andminorities reveals their lack of role models and mentors.This is of particular concern, given the national goal torely more on US citizens, and less on foreign nationals, asa future source for scientists and engineers. In most ofthe disciplines surveyed, comparison with recent PhDattainment reveals sufficient qualified females andminorities, so that many more could have been hired.
For decades, it has been recognized that the representa-tion of women and minorities in science and engineeringgenerally is far below that needed to insure the nationalsecurity, economic superiority, and scientific leadershipof our country. Because the scientists and engineersrequired for this must each pass through an educationalinstitution in order to obtain qualifications for employ-ment, problem solving analyses and efforts have come tofocus on academic institutions, particularly on scienceand engineering departments and their supportingorganizations. The anticipated large representation ofwomen and minorities in the US future population indi-cates that they will be among our future leaders; this war-rants analysis of the status of these underrepresentedgroups at research universities, because this is where themajority of our country’s leaders will be educated.
Attempts to correct problems facing underrepresentedgroups have included appeals to conscience, increasedfunding for females and minorities (predominantly stu-dents), and legislation. Progress for female and minorityfaculty at research universities, produced from pastattempted solutions combined, has been too slow. If sig-nificant progress is to be made within the next couple ofdecades, new and totally different approaches will beneeded.
In order to measure the effect of past attempts to increasefemale and minority leaders in science and engineering,it is important to determine and track the status of andenvironment for female and minority science and engi-neering faculty at research universities. Female andminority students already perceive the status and envi-ronment of these role models and use them to judge howthey themselves will be treated should they pursuedegrees and employment in those disciplines.
In order to establish the status of underrepresentedgroups, we surveyed the top 50 departments in each offourteen science and engineering disciplines, as rankedby the National Science Foundation1 (NSF) according toresearch funds expended. Each department chair wasasked to provide the gender, race/ethnicity, and rank ofeach tenured or tenure track faculty member. In thisreport, we discuss the data for women and underrepre-sented minorities (URMs), i.e. Blacks, Hispanics, andNative Americans; we also compare the faculty data tothose for PhD attainment and for BS attainment in anal-ogous disciplines.
“Who can look at these numbers and not say that we asa faculty have failed—failed our students, our institu-tion, and most of all, failed our nation?”
Professor Nancy Hopkins, Professor, MassachusettsInstitute of Technology2
A NATIONAL ANALYSIS OF DIVERSITY IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FACULTIES AT RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES
By Dr. Donna J. Nelson and Diana C. Rogers
2
WHO TEACHES MATTERS
Female students do not have an adequate number offemale role models and mentors. Although in recent yearsthe number of females studying science and engineeringhas increased significantly, science and engineering facul-ties are still overwhelmingly dominated by White men.The data show that the gender and racial compositions ofthe faculty do not reflect those of the student body.Although the student body has diversified considerably,the composition of the faculty has remained relativelystagnant. The result is a drastically disproportionate num-ber of male professors as mentors and role models. Forexample, in mathematics women receive almost half ofthe BS degrees but are less than 10% of the faculty.
There is a similar pattern in departments that have evenhigher percentages of female students. For example, inthe biological sciences, where females are 58.4% of theBS recipients, only 20.2% of the faculty are females.Even in psychology where females overwhelmingly dom-inate at 76.5% of BS recipients, only 33.5% of the facul-ty are females (Table 1).
“It was discouraging to know that when I went to (the University of) Texas in 1976, I was the secondwoman in a faculty of about 50, and when I left in 1998,they were again hiring a second woman.”
Professor Marye Anne Fox, Chancellor, North CarolinaState University 4
In each discipline examined, the representation of menamong faculty is much higher than that among BS degreerecipients. Often, female science or engineering majorsstudy in a department in which there is not one female“full” professor; in some departments, there is not afemale professor at any rank.
Because of the dearth of female faculty, male facultyshould actively encourage female students to enter sci-ence and engineering and should offer to become theirmentors. It is essential that they provide a fair environ-ment for the few existing female professors in science andengineering in order to convince female students that thesame awaits them in their future careers.
It is the paucity of women in science and engineeringthat is the cause of grave concern. It is likely that awoman could get a bachelor of science without beingtaught by a female professor in her discipline; it is possi-ble for a women to get a PhD in science or engineeringwithout having access to a woman faculty member in herfield; and, if the student is a woman of color, it is proba-ble she will earn her PhD without ever seeing a minorityfemale professor in her field.
Female student attrition in science and engineering hasbeen attributed, in part, to a lack of female mentors androle models. Many studies have shown that the merepresence of female faculty encourages female students.According to a forum published in Harvard Magazine,the percentage of women faculty is “the single mostimportant indicator of academic success for womenundergraduates.” 5
Female students are not the only ones affected by the lackof female faculty on campus. Male students are alsoharmed because they are deprived of access to talentedfaculty who could be their mentors. In addition, theabsence of women sends a message to men that womendo not belong in these non-traditional environments andthat it is acceptable for them to be marginalized, deniedtenure, and given unequal resources.
TABLE 1. Gender Distribution of BS Recipients vs. Role Models
% Females % Males
Students Faculty Students Faculty
Chemistry 47.3 12.1 52.7 87.9
Math 48.2 8.3 51.8 91.7
Computer Science 27.7 10.6 72.3 89.4
Astronomy 32.7 12.6 67.3 87.4
Physics 21.4 6.6 78.6 93.4
Chemical Engineering 35.7 10.5 64.3 89.5
Civil Engineering 24.5 9.8 75.5 90.2
Electrical Engineering 13.1 6.5 86.9 93.5
Mechanical Engineering 13.9 6.7 86.1 93.3
Economics 32.3 11.5 67.7 88.5
Political Science 50.1 23.5 49.9 76.5
Sociology 70.2 35.8 29.8 64.2
Psychology 76.5 33.5 23.5 66.5
Biological Sciences 58.4 20.2 41.6 79.8
BS degree data are for 2000, from NSF 3; faculty data are FY2002 except chem-istry (FY2003) and astronomy (FY2004)
3
Discipline White Male Asian Male Female URM Male
Asst PhDs Asst PhDs Asst PhDs Asst PhDs
Chemistry (FY2003) 65.4% 54.8% 11.5% 9.6% 21.5% 31.3% 1.6% 4.2%
Math 60.5% 58.1% 15.0% 11.3% 19.6% 27.2% 5.0% 3.3%
Computer Science 62.9% 60.6% 24.3% 15.1% 10.8% 20.5% 2.0% 3.5%
Astronomy (FY2004) 62.6% 69.8% 9.9% 6.6% 22.0% 20.6% 5.5% 2.6%
Physics 70.6% 68.9% 14.9% 13.9% 11.2% 13.3% 3.3% 3.8%
Chemical Engineering 60.7% 58.4% 16.6% 14.8% 21.4% 22.3% 1.4% 4.0%
Civil Engineering 57.9% 58.4% 11.3% 17.0% 22.3% 18.7% 8.6% 5.9%
Electrical Engineering 57.2% 59.1% 27.5% 23.9% 10.9% 11.5% 4.5% 5.5%
Mechanical Engineering 56.1% 63.4% 22.2% 21.2% 15.7% 10.4% 6.1% 5.0%
Economics 59.8% 54.9% 16.1% 9.6% 19.0% 29.3% 5.1% 6.0%
Political Science 54.2% 52.4% 4.5% 3.6% 36.5% 36.6% 4.8% 7.0%
Sociology 37.2% 31.5% 3.5% 3.0% 52.3% 58.9% 7.0% 6.5%
Psychology 46.0% 29.5% 4.6% 1.1% 45.4% 66.1% 4.0% 3.3%
Biological Sciences 55.4% 43.2% 10.7% 8.7% 30.2% 44.7% 3.7% 3.3%
physics, electrical engineering, and mechanical engineer-ing, women have the lowest percentage of female assis-tant professors, but they also have the lowest percentagesof PhD recipients. These low percentages of femalesamong PhD recipients would also be the easiest tomatch. Nevertheless, the scarcity of female professors inthese disciplines is probably at least partially related tothe low numbers of women earning a Ph.D.
Even where women outnumber men earning PhDs,White males maintain their hold on the vast majority ofassistant professor positions. For example, in the biologi-cal sciences, for years females have received the greaterpercentage of PhDs than White males, but White malesstill make up more than half of the assistant professors. Incomputer science, math, and chemistry, there is a similardisparity between the percentages of women among assis-tant professors versus PhD recipients (Table 2).
HIRING INEQUITY REVEALED IN MOST SCIENCES
Data in Table 2 reveal a reasonable match between femalePhDs and recently-hired female faculty in engineeringand some sciences, but not in seven of the other disci-plines studied. In those seven disciplines, there is a gen-der disparity between recent hires and the hiring pool.The percentage of women among PhD recipients from1993 – 2002 can be compared to the percentage ofwomen assistant professors. This shows that in many dis-ciplines women may be well-represented among PhDrecipients, but this representation is not reflected amongassistant professors. In these disciplines, there is a widegap between the percentage of women among PhD recip-ients since 1993 versus the percentage of women amongassistant professors, the rank most recently hired. Inmost science disciplines, qualified female candidatesexist, but they are not being hired. In three disciplines:
Table 2 . Assistant Professors (FY2002) and PhD Attainment (1993 - 2002) 6 in Science and Engineering Disciplines
4
SUFFICIENT WOMEN FILLED THE HIRING POOL
A growing number of women have been completingPhDs in science and engineering. The proportion ofwomen earning a PhD in science or engineering has gen-erally gradually increased over the last 20 years. PhDattainment by women rose an average of 6% between theyears 1983 – 1992 versus 1993 – 2001 (Table 3). Datademonstrate that the pool of potential female candidatesfor faculty positions is plentiful, but faculty search com-mittees and chairs often say they receive few applicationsfrom females. This agrees with comments often heardfrom recent female PhDs; they do not perceive the aca-demic environment as desirable, so they choose not toapply for faculty positions.
“Women who are eligible for faculty positions haveearned a Ph.D. in a chemistry department. They haveabsorbed the tone of that environment . . . and havedecided they don’t want any more of it.”
Professor Janet Osteryoung, Director, Division ofChemistry, National Science Foundation 4
Discipline 1983 – 1992 1993 – 2002
Chemistry 22.8% 31.3%
Math 20.5% 27.2%
Computer Science 17.9% 20.5%
Astronomy 12.7% 20.6%
Physics 9.0% 13.3%
Chemical Engineering 14.4% 22.3%
Civil Engineering 10.2% 18.7%
Electrical Engineering 6.4% 11.5%
Mechanical Engineering 6.0% 10.4%
Economics 22.4% 29.3%
Political Science 31.0% 36.6%
Sociology 51.1% 58.9%
Psychology 55.0% 66.1%
Biological Sciences 36.5% 46.7%
TABLE 3. Female PhDs by Years of PhD Attainment 6
5
WOMEN ARE UNDERREPRESENTED
There are very few tenured and tenure-track women fac-ulty in the “top 50” science and engineering depart-ments. Women have made strides as students in scienceand engineering. However, the data show that while thepercentages of women studying science and engineeringhave significantly increased, the faculties in science andengineering are still overwhelming dominated by men.Data in Table 4 show the distribution by rank of the fewfemale faculty in science and engineering. Becausewomen began with barely any representation on univer-sity faculties, and because only miniscule increases havebeen achieved each year, the progress made has beeninadequate. This is exacerbated by female faculty attri-tion, which is generally perceived to be much higher thanthat for male faculty.
Assistant Associate “Full” AllDiscipline Professor Professor Professor Ranks
Chemistry (FY2003) 4.1% 3.0% 5.1% 12.1%
Math 2.8% 2.4% 3.1% 8.3%
Computer Science 2.8% 3.8% 4.0% 10.6%
Astronomy (FY2004) 3.4% 2.6% 6.5% 12.6%
Physics 1.5% 1.4% 3.8% 6.6%
Chemical Engineering 3.8% 4.0% 2.7% 10.5%
Civil Engineering 4.8% 3.2% 1.8% 9.8%
Electrical Engineering 1.8% 2.5% 2.2% 6.5%
Mechanical Engineering 2.5% 2.3% 1.8% 6.7%
Economics 4.3% 3.0% 4.2% 11.5%
Political Science 8.6% 8.2% 6.7% 23.5%
Sociology 12.6% 11.0% 12.2% 35.8%
Psychology 9.6% 8.4% 15.4% 33.5%
Biological Sciences 6.3% 5.4% 8.5% 20.2%
“Many smart motivated women have cited isolation andmarginalization as reasons for moving out of science andengineering at major research institutions.”
Abigail Stewart, Project Director, Institute for Researchon Women and Gender, University of Michigan 7
TABLE 4. Female Science and Engineering Faculty by Rank (FY2002)
6
WOMEN HOLD THE LOWEST ACADEMIC RANK
For those few women who take professorships in scienceor engineering after attaining PhDs, a new host of con-cerns arise. The data demonstrate that women are morelikely than men to hold lower academic ranks (Table 5).
This phenomenon has been discussed in HarvardMagazine. “(T)he gap between the percentage of tenuredmen and the percentage of tenured women has notchanged in 30 years…among those in academia withdoctorates in science and engineering, only one-quarterof women had been awarded tenure, compared to one-half of men.” 5
Our data confirm this pattern. In all but computer sci-ence, the rank of assistant professor has the highest per-centage of female faculty (Table 5). Conversely, the rankwhich has highest percentage of male faculty is typicallythat of “full” professor, and that is the rank held by themajority of male faculty as well.
“I think a very plausible case can be made that academ-ic departments are an unhealthy—even hostile—envi-ronment for women.”
Dr. Debra Rolison, Naval Research Lab 4
Assistant professors, who are typically untenured, havelittle job security or capability to change the culture oftheir departments or disciplines. Tenure is granted by alaborious process that typically involves recommenda-tions by the department and by external reviewers, fol-lowed by approval from the college and the university.While there are some objective criteria, in the final analy-sis, these decisions have room for a great deal of subjec-tivity. Hence, assistant professors are uniquely vulnerableto the culture of their departments. Because most femaleprofessors are assistant professors, this means that thenumber of female professors who can safely take steps tochange the departmental environment is much smallerthan it might first appear.
UNDERREPRESENTED MINORITY WOMEN FACULTYALL BUT INVISIBLE.
In some disciplines, there is no representation of URM(Black, Hispanic, or Native American) women on thefaculty at all. In the “top 50” computer science depart-ments, there are no women in tenured or tenure-trackpositions. With the exception of one Black “full” profes-sor in astronomy, there are no female Black or NativeAmerican “full” professors in the physical science or engi-neering disciplines surveyed.
Similarly, in physics there are no Black female professors,and in eight of the nine physical science and engineeringdisciplines surveyed, Native American female professorsare nonexistent. URM females fare much better in thesocial sciences and the life sciences. The few femaleURM faculty in the “top 50” science and engineeringdepartments are detailed in Table 6 below. These data arein two groups to facilitate comparison and contrast; theseare physical sciences and engineering, and social sciencesand life sciences.
The data show URM women are less likely than eitherWhite women or men of any racial group to be “full”professors and to be awarded tenure. (Table 6). The few“full” professors in each discipline are designated byasterisks after the corresponding number.
Discipline Assistant Associate “Full” AllProfessor Professor Professor Ranks
Chemistry (FY2003) 21.5 20.5 7.6 12.1
Math 19.6 13.2 4.6 8.3
Computer Science 10.8 14.4 8.3 10.6
Astronomy (FY2004) 22.0 16.5 9.5 12.6
Physics 11.2 9.8 4.6 6.6
Chemical Engineering 21.4 19.2 4.4 10.5
Civil Engineering 22.3 11.5 3.5 9.8
Electrical Engineering 10.9 9.8 3.8 6.5
Mechanical Engineering 15.7 8.9 3.2 6.7
Economics 19.0 16.3 7.2 11.5
Political Science 36.5 28.6 13.9 23.5
Sociology 52.3 42.7 13.9 35.8
Psychology 45.4 40.1 13.9 33.5
Biological Sciences 30.2 24.9 14.8 20.2
TABLE 5. Percentage of Female Faculty within each Rank (FY2002)
7
Other studies have also concluded that URM minorityfemales are less likely to get tenure than White womenor men of any racial group. 5,8 Are universities training aninsufficient number of minority women or are qualifiedwomen looking outside the academy? The data indicatethat both are true, but to varying degrees in differentdisciplines.
Relatively few URM women earn advanced degrees inscience and engineering. The reason for this, according toProfessor Cheryl Leggon, is the lack of encouragementthey receive. She cites the National Center for EducationStatistics that found that “Hispanic and AfricanAmerican women do not persist in science because theyare not encouraged to do so.”8 Professor Leggon believesthis lack of encouragement has critical implications. Shestates that numerous studies have shown that “notencouraging women to persist (in science or engineering)produces the same result as actively discouraging them.” 8
Black Hispanic Native AmericanPhysical Sciences and Engineering females females females
Chemistry (FY2003) 1 5* 1
Math 2 7*** 0
Computer Science 0 0 0
Astronomy (FY2004) 2* 2* 0
Physics 0 8*** 0
Chemical Engineering 2 3 0
Electrical Engineering 7 3 0
Mechanical Engineering 3 2* 0
Civil Engineering 2 3* 0
Total 19 33 1
*URM female “full” professor 1 10 0
Social Sciences and Life Sciences
Economics 5*** 7*** 0
Political Science 26***** 6 0
Sociology 32******* 12** 0
Psychology 22*** 26***** 3
Biological Sciences 9* 13** 0
Total 94 53 3
*URM female “full” professor 19 12 0
Table 6. Female URM Faculty at “Top 50” Science and Engineering Departments (FY2002).
“I was surprised that even in 2002, these women (facul-ty) had so few opportunities in their professional careersto talk and network with other minority women scien-tists and engineers.”
Professor Evelynn Hammonds, Professor, HarvardUniversity 2
But the data also show that universities are not takingadvantage of the URM women who do complete thePhD. The data find that only fifty-three are faculty at“top 50” physical science and engineering departments.
Anne J. MacLachlin, at the Center for Studies in HigherEducation at U.C., Berkeley, believes “the academicexperience often led them (URM women who haveearned PhDs) to seek another kind of scientific work.” 9
Finally, we must pose a third possibility that applies to allwomen of any color earning PhDs in science or engineer-ing. Are qualified women rejected for academic positionsbecause of departmental practices that act as barriers tohiring and retaining women?
8
CONCLUSIONS
Disparities in hiring and retention between male andfemale science and engineering faculty place women at adistinct disadvantage at all levels, from undergraduate tofull professor. Women faculty are poorly represented inscience and engineering departments of research univer-sities. This has grave repercussions for undergraduate andgraduate students who are bereft of female role modelsand mentors and contributes to the attrition rate ofwomen studying science and engineering.
In most science disciplines studied, qualified female can-didates exist, but they are not achieving assistant profes-sorships. Whether hiring and work practices at thenation’s top universities actively discriminate cannot beanswered by this study. However, the numbers clearlyindicate a grave national problem that must be aggres-sively addressed now.
There is general agreement that few women typicallyapply for academic positions in science and engineeringdepartments at research universities. Yet the percentageof PhDs attained by women has steadily risen over thelast two decades. In some cases, it is reported that femaleapplicants for such openings have even declined fromyears past. There is not agreement on an explanation forthis phenomenon. Is the private sector more receptive towomen scientists? Have women found the academy ahostile environment? Do qualified women find them-selves rejected by departmental practices that operate asbarriers to hiring and retention? The low representationof female professors in these disciplines exacerbates alearning and work environment that is often alienatingand unfair.
The reasons need to be explored and solutions found.However, before the problem can be solved, it must bewell defined. In order to do this, the problems must bediscussed in detail and the barriers identified by thosemost knowledgeable about them. However, those mostfamiliar with these problems and most well-equipped toidentify solutions are often afraid to discuss them openly.The same situation holds for many minorities.Therefore, the first step to solving the problems facingwomen and minorities in science and engineering mustbe to generate an atmosphere in which it is acceptable todiscuss them.
The low number and percentage of women faculty makeit difficult for them to effect the needed changes bythemselves, so they will need assistance and support in
this. If all female faculty, both tenured and untenured, ina department work together, their total percentage ornumber is still usually insufficient to exert much leverage.According to Rosabeth Moss Kantor, underrepresentedgroups need to be at least 15% of an organization inorder to begin to impact that organization’s culture, pol-icy, and agenda.10 Even when combining all ranks,women remain a small fraction of the faculty in any sci-ence or engineering discipline in this study, below the15% mark.
The paucity of female faculty is exacerbated by their pre-dominantly low academic ranking. Most of the womenin science and engineering are assistant professors with-out the protection of tenure. This places them in a par-ticularly vulnerable position within the department andthe university. Tenure has a significant effect on thebehavior of professors; tenured professors have the secu-rity to help create cultural change. “Full” professors withtenure are most likely to take risks because they have thefreedom to say and do things, such as suggesting morefemale hires, without fear of losing their jobs or beingdenied promotion. Unfortunately, there are far too fewfemale “full” professors than that needed to effect signif-icant change in a reasonable amount of time. Finally, andperhaps, most importantly, when female students see thefew female faculty in their own discipline marginalized,treated poorly, or not promoted, it serves as a warning:stay in this profession at your own risk.
As Cheryl Leggon notes, 8 simply adding more women toscience and engineering departments is a “necessary butnot sufficient” agent of change. According to HarvardMagazine’s “Forum on Faculty Diversity”, 5 one formida-ble obstacle to gender parity is an “unaccommodatingculture” and a status quo that proves to be “an intractableforce.” Some of the concerns women frequently point toinclude: “limited opportunities to participate in depart-mental and institutional decision-making; excessive and‘token’ committee assignments; …research that’s trivial-ized and discounted…” 5
In order to diversify successfully and open wide the doorsfor women, universities have to examine culture, atti-tudes, and policies they have long followed assuredly.This is a long-overdue and realistic response to a chang-ing world. As Princeton chemist George McLendonobserved, “Academic institutions are intrinsically monas-tic institutions that were created in the 13th century.They might need a little fine-tuning.” 11
9
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The following individuals contributed to gathering oranalyzing survey data: Dr. Ann Beutel, ChristopherBrammer, Diana Rogers, Audra Wendt, Lina Ea,Naquesha Johnson, Natalie Frow, Zachary Cole, SergioVasquez, Roxanne LaMothe, Lea Mitchel, SheleathaTaylor, Brett Beecher, Kimberly Yang, LindseyAnderberg Torres, Ruibo Li (The University ofOklahoma); Laura Lopez, Dr. Nancy Hopkins(Massachusetts Institute of Technology); DaquantHornbeak (Langston University).
Dissemination of the survey data was made possible, inpart, by grants from the Ford Foundation and the JohnSimon Guggenheim Foundation. The Ford Foundationand The John Simon Guggenheim Foundation are notresponsible for the report’s conclusions and do notendorse activities that influence legislation.
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
Dr. Donna Nelson, is an associate professor of chemistryat the University of Oklahoma. Reared in Eufaula,Oklahoma, she took her BS in Chemistry at theUniversity of Oklahoma in 1974. She obtained her PhDin chemistry at the University of Texas with Michael J.S. Dewar in 1980, did her postdoctorate at PurdueUniversity with Herbert C. Brown during 1980 - 1983,and joined the University of Oklahoma in 1983.
She has an active research group in physical organicchemistry, in which she has developed a new synthetical-ly useful technique for gathering mechanistic informa-tion on addition reactions of alkenes. The investigationsoften permit selection of one mechanism from severalwhich are proposed. She has been recognized for thiswork, most recently via a Sigma Xi Faculty ResearchAward and a Guggenheim Award.
She has presented her diversity research results at nation-al meetings of professional societies, at Capitol Hill brief-ings with the US Congress, and before various otherorganizations in Washington, DC, and she has served onvarious national level task forces and committees address-ing these issues.
For more information about Dr. Nelson, visit her web siteat http://cheminfo.chem.ou.edu/faculty/djn/djn.html.
METHODOLOGY
Data were collected while at the University of Oklahomabetween 2000 and 2003 and the Massachusetts Instituteof Technology during the Fall, 2003. To investigate thegender, race/ethnicity, and rank of faculty, we surveyedtop research departments of fourteen science and engi-neering disciplines. To sample the top research depart-ments of a discipline, we selected all the departments ineach discipline that ranked in the top 50 according to themost recent National Science Foundation annual reporton research expenditures available at the time of data col-lection (National Science Foundation report on 1999expenditures, except 2000 for chemistry). The rankingfor astronomy departments was by the National ResearchCouncil, based on research expenditures in 1994. Thetop 50 departments were different for each discipline.
Over 90% of the departments in our sample are locatedin universities classified in either the Doctoral/ResearchUniversities-Extensive category or the Doctoral/ResearchUniversities-Intensive category of the CarnegieClassification of Institutions of Higher Education(McCormick 2001).
For each of the top 50 departments in research expendi-tures, department chairs were contacted and asked toreport the gender, race-ethnicity (Asian, Black, White,Hispanic, and Native American), and rank (assistant,associate, and professor) of tenured and tenure-track fac-ulty for fiscal year 2002 (fiscal year 2003 for chemistryand 2004 for astronomy). In a limited number ofinstances, data were unavailable from department chairsand were collected instead from other sources, such asdepartment websites and published directories.
CONTACT INFORMATION
Dr. Donna NelsonDepartment of ChemistryUniversity of OklahomaNorman, OK [email protected]
10
REFERENCES
1. (a) Academic Research and Development Expenditures: Fiscal Year 2001, NSF 02-308. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf02308/
(b) Academic Research and Development Expenditures: Fiscal Year 2000, NSF 01-329. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf01329/sectb.htm
(c) Academic Research and Development Expenditures: Fiscal year 1994, National Research Council.
2. Comments in response to presented preliminary data from this research project. Sarah H. Wright, “Minority Women Faculty Conferees Discuss Professional Obstacles,” Tech Talk, MIT (January 30, 2002).
3. Science and Engineering Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1991-2000, NSF 02-329, Susan T. Hill, Project Officer, (Arlington, VA 2002). http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf02329/start.htm
4. Elizabeth Zubritsky, “Women in Analytical Chemistry Speak Out,” Analytical Chemistry April 1, 2000, p. 10.
5. Cathy A. Trower and Richard P. Chait, “Faculty Diversity,” Harvard Magazine, March-April 2002
6. (a) Science and Engineering Doctorate Awards: 2002, NSF 04-303, Susan T. Hill, Project Officer, (Arlington,VA 2003). www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf04303/tables/tab3.xls
(b) PhDs 1985-94, Selected Data on Science and Engineering Doctorate Awards: 1995, NSF 96-303, (Arlington, VA, 1996). www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/s4095/start.htm
(c) PhDs 1983-93, Science and Engineering Doctorates Awarded, by Citizenship Status, Sex, Racial/Ethnic Group,and Major Field of Study of Recipients: 1993, NSF 94-318, (Arlington, VA, 1994).
(d) PhD attainment in sociology, economics, and political science are from National Science Foundation WebCASPAR Database System. http://caspar.nsf.gov/webcaspar/
7. Judy Steeh, “$3.7 Million Grant Aids Women in Science and Engineering,” The University Record,(University of Michigan) October 15, 2001.
8. Cheryl Leggon, “African American and Hispanic Women in Science and Engineering,” Making Strides, Vol. 3, no. 3 (July 2001) p. 7.
9. Anne J. MacLachlin, “Careers of Minority Women Scientists form the University of California, Berkeley,” Making Strides Vol. 3, no. 3 (July 2001) p. 2.
10. RosaBeth Moss Kanter Men and Women of the Corporation. (New York, 1977): Basic Books.
11. NSF Director Dr. Rita Colwell, 224th American Chemical Society National Meeting, Presidential Symposium on Diversity, August 18, 2002; http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/forum/colwell/rc020818acsdiversity.htm
11
APPENDICES
Appendix 1. Tables of data on tenured/tenure-track fac-ulty at the “top 50” departments of fourteen science andengineering disciplines by race/ethnicity, by gender, andby rank. In each data entry, the number after the deci-mal point shows the number of people that are female.For example the total number of chemistry faculty inFY2003 is 1654.200; this means there are 1654 people,200 of whom are female.
Appendix 2. Tables of data on US citizen and permanentresident PhD attainment in fourteen science and engi-neering disciplines each year from 1983 through 2002.Data are disaggregated by race/ethnicity and by gender.
APPENDIX 1
Tables of data on tenured/tenure-track faculty at the “top50” departments of fourteen science and engineering dis-ciplines by race/ethnicity, by gender, and by rank. Ineach data entry, the number after the decimal pointshows the number of people that are female. For exam-ple the total number of chemistry faculty in FY2003 is1654.200; this means there are 1654 people, 200 ofwhom are female.
Data are provided for the “top 50” departments in thefollowing disciplines:
Table 1 Chemistry
Table 2 Physics
Table 3 Mathematics
Table 4 Computer Science
Table 5 Chemical Engineering
Table 6 Civil Engineering
Table 7 Electrical Engineering
Table 8 Mechanical Engineering
Table 9 Economics
Table 10 Political Science
Table 11 Sociology
Table 12 Psychology
Table 13 Biological Sciences
Table 14 Astronomy
Tab
le 1
. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e T
rack
Che
mis
try
Fac
ulty
at t
he "
Top
50"
Che
mis
try
Dep
artm
ents
by
Rac
e/E
thni
city
, by
Gen
der,
and
by
Ran
k (F
Y 2
003)
*W
hite
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Asi
anN
ativ
e A
m.
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tU
CA
Ber
kele
y44
.006
17.
001
52.0
071
--
12
--
21
-2
3-
--
058
.007
MA
Inst
itute
of T
ech
20.0
031
5.00
126
.004
--
-0
--
-0
1-
2.00
13.
001
--
-0
29.0
05U
of I
L U
rban
a-C
ham
p24
.002
1.00
17.
001
32.0
04-
--
0-
1-
1-
2-
2-
--
035
.004
Har
vard
Uni
v15
.001
-3.
001
18.0
02-
--
01
--
11
-3.
001
4.00
1-
--
023
.003
Penn
sylv
ania
Sta
te U
17.0
016.
002
9.00
432
.007
--
-0
--
-0
11
-2
--
-0
34.0
07C
alif
orni
a In
st o
f Tec
h21
.002
14
26.0
02-
1-
1-
--
0-
11.
001
2.00
1-
--
029
.003
Tex
as A
&M
Uni
v34
.003
1.00
15
40.0
041
--
11
1-
2-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
044
.005
U W
I-M
adis
on33
.002
-6.
002
39.0
04-
--
0-
--
03
-2
5-
--
044
.004
Cor
nell
Uni
v17
.001
4.00
14
25.0
021
--
11
--
11
--
1-
--
028
.002
U C
A L
os A
ngel
es36
.005
5.00
17.
003
48.0
09-
1-
11
--
12.
001
-2.
001
4.00
2-
--
054
.011
Ohi
o St
ate
Uni
v20
.001
8.00
15.
001
33.0
03-
--
0-
2.00
1-
2.00
13
2-
5-
--
040
.004
U o
f Pen
nsyl
vani
a19
.002
53.
001
27.0
03-
--
0-
--
02
-1
31
--
131
.003
Stan
ford
Uni
v16
.001
21
19.0
01-
--
0-
--
01
11
3-
--
022
.001
John
s H
opki
ns U
121
4.00
117
.001
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
17.0
01U
niv
of O
klah
oma
142
6.00
122
.001
1-
-1
--
-0
11.
001
13.
001
-1.
001
-1.
001
27.0
03R
utge
rs th
e St
ate
U N
J35
.006
9.00
36.
001
50.0
10-
11.
001
2.00
1-
1.00
1-
1.00
12.
001
-2.
002
4.00
3-
--
057
.015
U C
A S
an F
ranc
isco
12.0
022
4.00
118
.003
--
-0
1-
-1
1-
-1
--
-0
20.0
03U
niv
of C
olor
ado
23.0
055
4.00
132
.006
--
-0
--
22
-2.
001
24.
001
--
-0
38.0
07Fl
orid
a St
ate
Uni
v19
.003
74.
001
30.0
04-
--
0-
--
01
-2.
002
3.00
2-
--
033
.006
Nor
thw
este
rn U
niv
22.0
011.
001
427
.002
--
-0
--
-0
-1
1.00
12.
001
--
-0
29.0
03U
MA
Am
hers
t10
6.00
13
19.0
01-
--
0-
2.00
1-
2.00
1-
-1
1-
--
022
.002
Purd
ue U
niv
28.0
035.
002
8.00
241
.007
1-
-1
-1.
001
-1.
001
1-
3.00
14.
001
--
-0
47.0
09In
dian
a U
niv
164.
001
6.00
226
.003
--
-0
--
11
2-
-2
--
-0
29.0
03U
TX
at A
ustin
33.0
015.
001
846
.002
--
-0
--
-0
1-
-1
--
-0
47.0
02U
of N
C C
hape
l Hill
25.0
024.
002
8.00
137
.005
--
-0
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
38.0
05U
niv
of F
lorid
a30
.001
10.0
013
43.0
02-
1.00
1-
1.00
11
-1.
001
2.00
1-
1-
1-
--
047
.004
Uni
v of
Not
re D
ame
157.
001
6.00
228
.003
1-
-1
--
.0
--
-0
--
-0
29.0
03G
eorg
ia In
st o
f Tec
h15
312
.003
30.0
03-
--
0-
1-
1-
--
0-
--
031
.003
Prin
ceto
n U
niv
204.
003
327
.003
--
-0
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
28.0
03U
CA
San
Die
go31
.005
3.00
16
40.0
061
--
1-
--
02
23
7-
--
048
.006
Uni
v of
Ariz
ona
23.0
041
226
.004
--
-0
-2
1.00
13.
001
--
22
--
-0
31.0
05U
CA
Irvi
ne22
.001
2.00
14
28.0
021
--
1-
--
01
-3.
002
4.00
2-
--
033
.004
U o
f Sou
th C
arol
ina
18.0
012
525
.001
--
-0
--
-0
--
2.00
12.
001
--
-0
27.0
02U
of W
ashi
ngto
n33
.001
2.00
14.
002
39.0
042
1-
3-
--
0-
21
3-
--
045
.004
Uni
v of
Mic
higa
n24
.001
4.00
17.
001
35.0
031
--
1-
--
01
-1
2-
--
038
.003
Ari
zona
Sta
te U
niv
22.0
014.
001
6.00
232
.004
--
-0
1.00
1-
12.
001
--
11
--
-0
35.0
05U
niv
of C
hica
go16
.001
23
21.0
01-
--
0-
--
03
1.00
11
5.00
1-
--
026
.002
Loui
sian
a St
U S
yste
m19
54.
001
28.0
011
--
1-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
031
.003
Uni
v of
Min
neso
ta19
.001
7.00
29.
001
35.0
04-
--
0-
--
01
12
4-
--
039
.004
Uni
v of
Uta
h19
.001
4.00
14
27.0
02-
--
0-
--
01
-1.
001
2.00
1-
--
029
.003
Uni
v of
Akr
on11
.002
-4
15.0
02-
--
0-
--
01
-1
2-
--
017
.002
Uni
v of
Virg
inia
192.
001
122
.001
--
11
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
24.0
01N
C S
tate
Uni
v13
.001
86.
001
27.0
02-
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
12
1-
3-
--
031
.003
VA
Pol
ytec
h In
st &
St U
14.0
0111
.002
328
.003
--
-0
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
29.0
03U
of S
o C
alifo
rnia
18.0
013
1.00
122
.002
--
-0
--
-0
2-
24
--
-0
26.0
02U
niv
of P
ittsb
urgh
128.
002
6.00
126
.003
--
-0
--
-0
--
22
--
-0
28.0
03M
ichi
gan
Stat
e U
niv
19.0
0211
.002
535
.004
1-
-1
1-
-1
1-
-1
1-
-1
39.0
04Em
ory
Uni
v12
24.
001
18.0
01-
--
0-
--
02
1-
3-
--
021
.001
Uni
v of
Kan
sas
10.0
027.
001
7.00
424
.007
--
-0
--
-0
1-
-1
--
-0
25.0
07C
olum
bia
U, C
ity o
f NY
15.0
011
5.00
121
.002
--
-0
--
-0
1-
-1
--
-0
22.0
0210
34.0
8119
9.03
925
1.04
714
84.1
6713
5.00
12.
001
20.0
0210
.001
12.0
057.
003
29.0
0944
.002
22.0
0352
.016
118.
021
21.
001
03.
001
1654
.200
Per
cent
wit
hin
race
71%
13%
17%
100%
67%
25%
10%
100%
34%
41%
24%
100%
37%
19%
44%
100%
67%
33%
0%10
0%P
erce
nt o
f gra
nd to
tal
62.5
%12
.0%
15.2
%89
.7%
0.8%
0.3%
0.1%
1.2%
0.6%
0.7%
0.4%
1.8%
2.7%
1.3%
3.1%
7.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
0.2%
100%
Fem
ales
in c
olum
n6.
7%19
.6%
18.7
%11
.3%
0%20
.0%
50.0
%10
.0%
10.0
%41
.7%
42.9
%31
.0%
4.5%
13.6
%30
.8%
17.8
%0%
100%
0%33
%12
.1%
*By
chem
ical
rese
arch
exp
endi
ture
s FY
2000
, NSF
; num
bers
afte
r dec
imal
s de
sign
ate
fem
ales
. **D
eclin
ed; d
ata
are
from
oth
er s
ourc
es.
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l
Che
mis
try
Tot
al
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tJo
hns
Hop
kins
U24
.002
-3
27.0
02-
--
0-
--
04
1-
5-
--
032
.002
MA
Inst
itute
of T
ech
50.0
045
11.0
0266
.006
--
-0
--
-0
22
6.00
210
.002
--
-0
76.0
08U
CA
Ber
kele
y30
.002
65
41.0
02-
--
01
--
19
2.00
11
12.0
01-
--
054
.003
Cal
ifor
nia
Inst
of T
ech
41-
2.00
143
.001
--
-0
--
-0
2.00
11
-3.
001
--
-0
46.0
02U
TX
at A
ustin
**31
82
41-
--
01
-1.
001
2.00
13
21
6-
--
049
.001
Cor
nell
Uni
vers
ity
30.0
016.
001
440
.002
--
-0
-1
-1
2-
1.00
13.
001
--
-0
44.0
03Fl
orid
a St
ate
Uni
vers
ity
244.
001
5.00
133
.002
1-
-1
3.00
1-
14.
001
12
47
--
-0
45.0
03U
MD
at C
olle
ge P
ark
39.0
0110
.002
5.00
154
.004
1-
-1
--
-0
17-
-17
--
-0
72.0
04M
ichi
gan
Stat
e U
384
446
--
-0
--
-0
22
-4
--
-0
50U
CA
Los
Ang
eles
47
.004
35
55.0
04-
--
02.
001
--
2.00
15
1-
6-
--
063
.005
U Il
linoi
s U
rban
a-C
ham
36.0
017.
001
8.00
251
.004
1-
-1
1-
-1
4-
15
--
-0
58.0
04U
WI-
Mad
ison
36
.003
3.00
14
43.0
04-
--
0-
--
03.
001
-2
5.00
1-
--
048
.005
Indi
ana
Uni
vers
ity
27.0
025
436
.002
--
-0
--
-0
1-
12
--
-0
38.0
02U
of A
lask
a Fa
irba
nks
103
2.00
115
.001
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
15.0
01Pe
nnsy
lvan
ia S
tate
U**
25.0
015
333
.001
--
-0
1-
1.00
12.
001
72.
001
2.00
111
.002
--
-0
46.0
04SU
NY
at S
tony
Bro
ok43
.001
57
55.0
01-
-1
12
-1.
001
3.00
12
--
2-
--
061
.002
Prin
ceto
n U
nive
rsity
25.0
012.
001
936
.002
--
-0
--
-0
11
1.00
13.
001
--
-0
39.0
03U
CA
San
Die
go**
22.0
016.
001
129
.002
--
-0
1-
-1
21
-3
--
-0
33.0
02U
CA
San
ta B
arba
ra
28.0
014.
001
4.00
236
.004
--
-0
1.00
1-
-1.
001
1-
-1
--
-0
38.0
05U
of P
enns
ylva
nia
21.0
025
531
.002
-1
-1
--
-0
11.
001
35.
001
--
-0
37.0
03U
of W
ashi
ngto
n38
.003
27.
001
47.0
04-
--
01
--
1-
--
0-
--
048
.004
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
117.
001
422
.001
1-
-1
--
-0
2-
4.00
16.
001
--
-0
29.0
02V
ande
rbilt
Uni
vers
ity17
5.00
13
25.0
01-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
025
.001
NC
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
20.0
019.
001
6.00
235
.004
--
-0
--
1.00
11.
001
2-
13
--
-0
39.0
05R
utge
rs th
e St
ate
U N
J 42
.004
95.
001
56.0
05-
--
0-
-1
13
11
5-
--
062
.005
Geo
rgia
Inst
of T
ech
163
726
--
-0
--
-0
1.00
11
-2.
001
--
-0
28.0
01Y
ale
Uni
vers
ity19
.001
47
30.0
01-
-1
1-
--
0-
--
01
--
132
.001
Har
vard
Uni
vers
ity
38.0
04-
341
.004
--
-0
1-
-1
1-
12
--
-0
44.0
04U
nive
rsity
of C
olor
ado
27.0
027.
001
741
.003
--
-0
--
-0
11
13
--
-0
44.0
03U
of I
owa
185.
001
326
.001
-1
-1
--
-0
2.00
1-
-2.
001
--
-0
29.0
02O
hio
Stat
e U
nive
rsity
32.0
016
644
.001
--
-0
--
-0
5.00
12
29.
001
--
-0
53.0
02U
of C
entra
l Flo
rida*
**5
36.
001
14.0
01-
--
0-
1-
11
1.00
1-
2.00
1-
--
017
.002
Purd
ue U
nive
rsity
29.0
025
135
.002
--
-0
--
11
6-
28
--
-0
44.0
02U
nive
rsity
of C
hica
go26
.001
44
34.0
01-
--
0-
--
01
11
3-
--
037
.001
Tex
as A
&M
Uni
vers
ity
35.0
01-
237
.001
--
-0
--
-0
21
-3
--
-0
40.0
01U
nive
rsity
of F
lorid
a8
31
12-
--
01
1-
2-
1-
1-
--
015
U o
f Ten
ness
ee S
yste
m22
.001
4-
26.0
011
--
11
--
1-
1-
1-
--
029
.001
Uni
v of
Min
neso
ta29
.002
277
63.0
02-
--
01
1-
21
11
3-
--
068
.002
U o
f NC
Cha
pel H
ill16
.002
32
21.0
02-
--
01
--
12
41
7-
--
029
.002
U M
A A
mhe
rst
21.0
015
329
.001
--
-0
1-
-1
3-
14
--
-0
34.0
01U
CA
Irvi
ne25
.001
15.
001
31.0
02-
--
0-
--
04
1.00
12
7.00
1-
--
038
.003
Lou
isia
na S
t U S
yste
m
227
433
--
-0
1-
1.00
12.
001
4.00
4-
-4.
004
--
-0
39.0
05U
Ala
bam
a H
unts
ville
12.0
011
114
.001
--
-0
--
-0
11
13
--
-0
17.0
01U
nive
rsity
of R
oche
ster
17.0
012.
001
3.00
122
.003
--
-0
--
-0
3-
14
--
-0
26.0
03SU
NY
at A
lban
y 5.
001
12.
001
8.00
2-
--
0-
11
27
-1
8-
--
018
.002
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n 34
.002
7.00
27
48.0
041
-2
31
11
32
11
4-
--
058
.004
Uni
v of
New
Mex
ico
158.
003
225
.003
--
-0
--
-0
3-
-3
--
-0
28.0
03K
ansa
s St
ate
Uni
vers
ity15
12.
001
18.0
01-
--
0-
--
04.
001
3.00
11
8.00
2-
--
026
.003
Way
ne S
tate
Uni
vers
ity
11.0
016
623
.001
--
-0
--
-0
5.00
11
-6.
001
--
-0
29.0
02U
CA
San
ta C
ruz
16.0
012.
001
-18
.002
--
-0
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
19.0
02P
hysi
cs T
otal
1268
.061
238.
021
209.
019
1715
.101
62
412
22.0
036
10.0
0538
.008
135.
011
41.0
0646
.006
222.
023
10
01
1988
.132
Per
cent
wit
hin
race
74%
14%
12%
100%
50%
17%
33%
100%
58%
16%
26%
100%
61%
18%
21%
100%
100%
0%0%
100%
Per
cent
of g
rand
tota
l63
.8%
12.0
%10
.5%
86.3
%0.
30%
0.10
%0.
20%
0.60
%1.
11%
0.30
%0.
50%
1.91
%6.
79%
2.06
%2.
31%
11.1
7%0.
05%
0%0%
0.05
%10
0%F
emal
es in
col
umn
4.8%
8.8%
9.1%
5.9%
0%0%
0%0%
9.1%
0.0%
50.0
%18
.4%
8.1%
14.6
%13
.0%
10.4
%0%
0%0%
0%6.
6%
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l*A
ccor
ding
to p
hysi
cs re
sear
ch e
xpen
ditu
res
FY19
99, N
SF; n
umbe
rs a
fter d
ecim
als
desi
gnat
e fe
mal
es.
**D
eclin
ed to
par
ticip
ate,
dat
a ar
e fr
om o
ther
sou
rces
. ***
CR
EO
L d
ata
are
not i
nclu
ded.
Tab
le 2
. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at t
he "
Top
50"
Phy
sics
Dep
artm
ents
by
Rac
e/E
thni
city
, by
Gen
der,
and
by
Ran
k (F
Y 2
002)
*N
ativ
e A
m.
Whi
teB
lack
His
pani
cA
sian
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tJo
hns
Hop
kins
U15
-4.
001
19.0
01-
--
0-
--
01
-2
3-
--
022
.001
U T
X a
t Aus
tin *
*43
.003
6.00
11
50.0
04-
--
04.
001
21
7.00
11
--
1-
--
058
.005
G. W
ashi
ngto
n U
73
313
--
-0
-1.
001
-1.
001
12
1.00
14.
001
--
-0
18.0
02R
utge
rs, S
t U N
J **
51.0
035
11.0
0167
.004
--
-0
3-
-3
35
-8
--
-0
78.0
04B
osto
n C
olle
ge8.
002
11.0
011
20.0
03-
--
0-
--
0-
1-
1-
--
021
.003
NC
Sta
te U
niv
25.0
0213
.001
4.00
242
.005
3-
-3
-1
-1
11-
213
--
-0
59.0
05U
of S
o C
arol
ina
20
.001
11.0
013
34.0
02-
--
0-
--
0-
3-
3-
--
037
.002
Bro
wn
Uni
v14
.001
2.00
13.
001
19.0
03-
--
0-
--
0-
-1
1-
--
020
.003
Iow
a S
tate
Uni
v22
.001
11.0
014.
001
37.0
03-
--
0-
--
03
51
9-
--
046
.003
New
Yor
k U
niv
324
3.00
139
.001
--
-0
11
-2
4.00
1-
37.
001
--
-0
48.0
02M
A In
st o
f Tec
h29
5.00
112
.002
46.0
03-
--
01
--
12
-2
4-
--
051
.003
SU
NY
, Sto
ny B
rook
20.0
022
426
.002
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
--
-0
27.0
02U
niv
of M
inne
sota
508.
001
361
.001
--
-0
2.00
1-
-2.
001
23
16
--
-0
69.0
02U
niv
of G
eorg
ia
1715
.003
335
.003
--
-0
--
-0
31
26
--
-0
41.0
03U
CA
Los
Ang
eles
384
244
--
-0
--
-0
8.00
11
-9.
001
--
-0
53.0
01U
niv
of F
lorid
a26
.002
811
.003
45.0
051
--
12
--
25.
001
21
8.00
1-
--
056
.006
Sta
nfor
d U
niv
191.
001
2.00
122
.002
--
-0
--
-0
2-
-2
--
-0
24.0
02F
lorid
a S
tate
Uni
v20
.001
75.
001
32.0
02-
--
0-
1-
13
11.
001
5.00
1-
--
038
.003
U C
A B
erke
ley
56.0
032
361
.003
--
-0
--
-0
21
14
--
-0
65.0
03G
eorg
ia In
st T
ech*
*23
78.
001
38.0
011
--
1-
-1
15
32
101
--
151
.001
Car
negi
e M
ello
n U
1
83
425
--
-0
1.00
1-
12.
001
--
-0
--
-0
27.0
01U
of W
ashi
ngto
n
32.0
017.
001
645
.002
--
-0
11.
001
-2.
001
11
2.00
14.
001
--
-0
51.0
04U
Tx
Md
And
rsn
Ctr
7-
-7
--
-0
--
-0
--
1.00
11.
001
--
-0
8.00
1U
WI-
Mad
ison
***
36.0
017.
001
5.00
148
.003
--
-0
1-
-1
4-
26
--
-0
55.0
03P
enns
ylva
nia
St U
33.0
036.
001
5.00
144
.005
1-
1.00
12.
001
--
-0
6.00
12
2.00
110
.002
--
-0
56.0
08P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
47
.003
8.00
26.
003
61.0
081
--
13
1-
49
5.00
14.
002
18.0
03-
--
084
.011
Uni
v of
Mic
higa
n45
.002
5.00
14.
001
54.0
04-
-1.
001
1.00
11
--
1-
21
31
--
160
.005
US
Nav
Pos
tgrd
Sch
l7
6.00
1-
13.0
01-
--
0-
--
01
1-
2-
--
015
.001
Tex
as A
&M
Uni
v40
.001
12.0
018.
002
60.0
04-
--
01
22
53
21.
001
6.00
1-
--
071
.005
Uni
v of
IL C
hica
go42
.003
710
.001
59.0
04-
1-
11
--
12
-2
4-
--
065
.004
Cor
nell
Uni
vers
ity
32.0
022
2.00
136
.003
--
-0
1-
-1
2-
13
--
-0
40.0
03P
rince
ton
Uni
v22
.001
16
29.0
01-
--
0-
-1
14.
001
-5.
002
9.00
3-
--
039
.004
Bos
ton
Uni
vers
ity
18.0
038.
001
5.00
131
.005
--
-0
--
-0
21
25
--
-0
36.0
05R
ice
Uni
vers
ity
12-
113
--
-0
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
14U
niv
of A
rizon
a
27.0
0117
.001
549
.002
--
-0
11.
001
13.
001
2.00
14.
001
28.
002
-1
-1
61.0
05U
CA
San
ta B
arba
ra
20
.001
22.
001
24.0
02-
1-
11
-2
33
2.00
1-
5.00
1-
--
033
.003
VA
Pol
ytec
h In
st31
12.0
042
45.0
041
--
1-
-1
12.
001
41.
001
7.00
2-
--
054
.006
Yal
e U
nive
rsity
15-
-15
--
-0
--
-0
1-
-1
--
-0
16W
. Mic
higa
n U
11.0
016.
002
6.00
423
.007
1-
-1
--
-0
-3.
002
-3.
002
--
-0
27.0
09U
IL U
rban
a-C
ham
42.0
0115
.002
17.0
0174
.004
--
-0
--
-0
3.00
1-
-3.
001
--
-0
77.0
05U
of S
o C
alifo
rnia
19.0
014
326
.001
--
-0
1-
-1
-1
12
--
-0
29.0
01U
niv
of C
olor
ado
9-
1.00
110
.001
1-
12
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
13.0
01C
lem
son
Uni
v15
.001
9.00
24.
001
28.0
04-
1-
1-
--
03.
001
14.
001
8.00
2-
--
037
.006
San
Die
go S
t Uni
v14
4.00
25.
003
23.0
05-
--
01
-2
32
-1
3-
--
029
.005
U o
f NB
, Lin
coln
16.0
019.
002
5.00
130
.004
--
-0
-1
-1
2-
13
--
-0
34.0
04C
O S
choo
l Min
es7
7.00
21.
001
15.0
03-
--
0-
-1
11
-1
2-
--
018
.003
Har
vard
Uni
v14
.001
--
14.0
01-
--
0-
--
02
--
2-
--
016
.001
Col
orad
o S
tate
Uni
v22
.001
37.
003
32.0
04-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
032
.004
U M
A A
mhe
rst
25.0
014
11.0
0140
.002
21
-3
--
1.00
11.
001
4.00
1-
26.
001
--
-0
50.0
04In
dian
a U
nive
rsity
288.
001
5.00
141
.002
--
-0
1-
-1
56.
003
112
.003
--
-0
54.0
05M
athe
mat
ics
Tot
al12
41.0
5129
7.03
922
6.04
417
64.1
3412
43.
002
19.0
0228
.003
12.0
0315
.001
55.0
0712
0.01
065
.008
57.0
1224
2.03
02
10
320
83.1
73P
erce
nt w
ithi
n ra
ce70
%17
%13
%10
0%63
%21
%16
%10
0%51
%22
%27
%10
0%50
%27
%24
%10
0%67
%33
%0%
100%
Per
cent
of g
rand
tota
l59
.6%
14.3
%10
.9%
84.7
%0.
6%0.
2%0.
1%0.
9%1.
3%0.
6%0.
7%2.
6%5.
8%3.
1%2.
7%11
.6%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
100%
Fem
ales
in c
olum
n4.
1%13
.1%
19.5
%7.
6%0.
0%0.
0%66
.7%
10.5
%10
.7%
25.0
%6.
7%12
.7%
8.3%
12.3
%21
.1%
12.4
%0%
0%0%
0%8.
3%
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l
Tab
le 3
. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at t
he "
Top
50"
Mat
hem
atic
s D
epar
tmen
ts*
by R
ace/
Eth
nici
ty, b
y G
ende
r, a
nd b
y R
ank
(FY
200
2)
*Acc
ordi
ng to
mat
h re
sear
ch e
xpen
ditu
res
FY19
99, N
SF; n
umbe
rs a
fter d
ecim
als
desi
gnat
e fe
mal
es. *
*Dec
lined
; dat
a ar
e fr
om o
ther
sou
rces
. ***
Prov
ided
rank
/gen
der d
ata;
race
/eth
nici
ty d
ata
are
from
oth
er s
ourc
es.
Nat
ive
Am
.W
hite
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Asi
an
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tJo
hns
Hop
kins
U7
17
15-
--
0-
--
01
-1
2-
--
017
U o
f Illi
nois
Urb
ana-
Cha
m9
7.00
17.
001
23.0
02-
--
02
11
46
3.00
24
13.0
02-
--
040
.004
Car
negi
e M
ello
n U
18
.001
13.0
025.
002
36.0
05-
--
0-
--
04.
001
1.00
12
7.00
2-
--
043
.007
U o
f Sou
ther
n C
alif
orni
a11
2.00
16
19.0
01-
--
0-
--
01
12
4-
--
023
.001
U C
A S
an D
iego
20.0
025
631
.002
--
-0
--
-0
7.00
1-
18.
001
--
-0
39.0
03M
A In
stitu
te o
f Tec
h23
.004
8.00
17
38.0
05-
--
01
--
13
21
6-
--
045
.005
Geo
rgia
Inst
itute
of T
ech
13.0
0213
.003
16.0
0442
.009
--
-0
-1
23
76.
001
518
.001
--
-0
63.0
10U
MD
at C
olle
ge P
ark
19.0
016.
002
5.00
130
.004
-1
-1
--
-0
33
39
--
-0
40.0
04U
TX
at A
ustin
139.
002
7.00
329
.005
--
-0
--
-0
6.00
1-
28.
001
--
-0
37.0
06C
orne
ll U
nive
rsity
15.0
026.
001
1031
.003
--
-0
--
-0
--
1.00
11.
001
--
-0
32.0
04St
anfo
rd U
nive
rsity
15
8.00
27.
001
30.0
03-
--
01
-1
21.
001
--
1.00
1-
--
033
.004
Ohi
o St
ate
Uni
vers
ity4.
001
75
16.0
01-
--
0-
--
07
55
17-
--
033
.001
Syra
cuse
Uni
vers
ity
65
3.00
214
.002
--
-0
1-
12
92
314
--
-0
30.0
02U
nive
rsity
of U
tah
12.0
015.
001
4.00
121
.003
--
-0
--
-0
1-
12
--
-0
23.0
03U
of A
lask
a Fa
irba
nks
3.00
16
9.00
218
.003
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
18.0
03R
ice
Uni
vers
ity
84.
001
214
.001
--
-0
--
-0
-1.
001
-1.
001
--
-0
15.0
02U
MA
Am
hers
t 17
.003
8.00
13
28.0
04-
--
0-
--
02
11
4-
--
032
.004
Cal
ifor
nia
Inst
of T
ech
32
38
--
-0
--
-0
11
-2
--
-0
10U
nive
rsity
of M
ichi
gan
21.0
015
632
.001
--
-0
--
-0
31
37
--
-0
39.0
01U
of N
C C
hape
l Hill
12
4-
16-
--
0-
1-
12
2.00
12
6.00
1-
--
023
.001
OR
Gra
d In
st S
ci &
Tec
h14
.002
31
18.0
02-
--
0-
--
0-
11
2-
--
020
.002
U o
f Pen
nsyl
vani
a 12
.002
12.0
014
28.0
03-
-1
1-
--
04
-4.
001
8.00
1-
--
037
.004
Was
hing
ton
Uni
vers
ity3.
001
37.
001
13.0
02-
--
0-
--
0-
21
3-
--
016
.002
U C
A L
os A
ngel
es12
.002
53
20.0
02-
--
01
--
14.
001
-2
6.00
1-
--
027
.003
U o
f Ten
ness
ee S
yste
m8.
001
92
19.0
01-
1-
1-
--
0-
-1
1-
--
021
.001
SUN
Y a
t Buf
falo
3
5.00
12
10.0
01-
--
0-
--
03
7.00
24
14.0
02-
--
024
.003
Uni
vers
ity o
f Min
neso
ta6.
001
56.
001
17.0
02-
--
0-
--
09.
001
22
13.0
01-
--
030
.003
Uni
vers
ity o
f Col
orad
o 11
9.00
25.
001
25.0
031
--
1-
--
0-
11
2-
--
028
.003
U W
I-M
adis
on
22.0
021.
001
7.00
130
.004
--
-0
1-
-1
3-
14
--
-0
35.0
04R
utge
rs th
e St
ate
U N
J -
2-
2-
--
0-
--
01
12.
002
4.00
2-
--
06.
002
U o
f Ala
bam
a H
unts
ville
2.00
13
5.00
210
.003
--
-0
--
-0
21
-3
--
-0
13.0
03N
ew Y
ork
Uni
vers
ity
15.0
026
425
.002
--
-0
--
-0
2-
13
--
-0
28.0
02Pu
rdue
Uni
vers
ity
15.0
016.
001
4.00
125
.003
--
-0
--
-0
32
510
--
-0
35.0
03U
nive
rsity
of V
irgin
ia
9.00
15
620
.001
--
-0
--
-0
1-
-1
--
-0
21.0
01N
ew M
exic
o St
ate
Uni
v1
24
7-
--
0-
--
0-
21
3-
--
010
Col
umbi
a U
, City
of N
Y
13.0
023
622
.002
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
22.0
02U
of W
ashi
ngto
n 19
.003
68
33.0
03-
--
0-
-1
11
-1
2-
--
036
.003
U C
A Ir
vine
14.0
0212
.002
5.00
231
.006
--
-0
--
-0
22
4.00
18.
001
--
-0
39.0
07U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a3
5.00
15
13.0
01-
--
0-
--
02
-2.
001
4.00
1-
--
017
.002
Bro
wn
Uni
vers
ity11
36.
002
20.0
02-
--
0-
--
0-
-1
1-
--
021
.002
Uni
v of
Ala
bam
a1
6.00
12
9.00
1-
--
0-
--
01.
001
-2
3.00
1-
--
012
.002
Cal
if P
olyt
echn
ic
16.0
016.
002
224
.003
--
-0
--
-0
11.
001
-2.
001
--
-0
26.0
04Pr
ince
ton
Uni
vers
ity10
.001
15
16.0
01-
--
0-
--
02
25.
001
9.00
1-
--
025
.002
Uni
vers
ity o
f Flo
rida
36.
001
716
.001
--
-0
-1
-1
82.
001
111
.001
--
-0
28.0
02U
S N
aval
Pos
tgra
d Sc
h4
6.00
11
11.0
01-
--
0-
--
01.
001
21
4.00
1-
--
015
.002
U o
f LA
at L
afay
ette
13
5.00
19.
001
--
-0
--
-0
45
211
--
-0
20.0
01SU
NY
at S
tony
Bro
ok
94.
001
9.00
122
.002
--
-0
--
-0
22.
001
48.
001
--
-0
30.0
03U
nive
rsity
of O
rego
n8.
001
6.00
22
16.0
03-
--
0-
--
0-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
--
017
.004
Tex
as A
&M
Uni
vers
ity11
6.00
23
20.0
02-
--
0-
--
01
34
8-
--
028
.002
Uni
vers
ity o
f Kan
sas
27.
002
110
.002
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
10.0
02C
ompu
ter
Scie
nces
Tot
al50
7.04
528
0.03
924
5.03
010
32.1
141
21
47
46
1712
1.00
868
.012
90.0
0727
9.02
70
00
013
32.1
41P
erce
nt w
ithi
n ra
ce49
%27
%24
%10
0%25
%50
%25
%10
0%41
%24
%35
%10
0%43
%24
%32
%10
0%0%
0%0%
0%P
erce
nt o
f gra
nd to
tal
38.1
%21
.0%
18.4
%77
.5%
0.1%
0.2%
0.1%
0.3%
0.5%
0.3%
0.5%
1.3%
9.1%
5.1%
6.8%
20.9
%0%
0%0%
0%10
0%F
emal
es in
col
umn
8.9%
13.9
%12
.2%
11.0
%0.
0%0.
0%0.
0%0.
0%0.
0%0.
0%0.
0%0.
0%6.
6%17
.6%
7.8%
9.7%
0%0%
0%0%
10.6
%
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l
Tab
le 4
. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at t
he "
Top
50"
Com
pute
r Sc
ienc
e D
epar
tmen
ts*
by R
ace/
Eth
nici
ty, b
y G
ende
r, a
nd b
y R
ank
(FY
200
2)
*Acc
ordi
ng to
com
pute
r sci
ence
rese
arch
exp
endi
ture
s FY
1999
, NSF
; num
bers
afte
r dec
imal
s de
sign
ate
fem
ales
.
Nat
ive
Am
.W
hite
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Asi
an
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tM
A In
stitu
te o
f Tec
h 21
.01
4.01
429
.02
-1.
01-
1.01
--
-0
11.
01-
2.01
--
-0
32.0
4N
C S
tate
Uni
vers
ity9.
014
417
.01
-1.
01-
1.01
1-
-1
2-
-2
--
-0
21.0
2U
nive
rsity
of M
inne
sota
236.
024
33.0
2-
--
0-
--
01
-1
2-
--
035
.02
Texa
s A
&M
Uni
vers
ity
13.0
11
3.01
17.0
2-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
017
.02
U T
X a
t Aus
tin
111
3.01
15.0
11
--
11
--
1-
13.
014.
01-
--
021
.02
New
Mex
ico
Stat
e U
niv
33.
011.
017.
02-
--
01
--
1-
--
0-
--
08.
02U
WI-
Mad
ison
6
6.01
315
.01
--
-0
1-
-1
-1
-1
--
-0
17.0
1St
anfo
rd U
nive
rsity
7.01
-1.
018.
02-
--
0-
-1
11
-1.
012.
01-
--
011
.03
Uni
vers
ity o
f Del
awar
e 12
3.01
2.01
17.0
21
--
1-
--
01
--
1-
--
019
.02
U o
f Okl
ahom
a7
33.
0113
.01
--
-0
2-
-2
1-
-1
--
-0
16.0
1U
of S
outh
Car
olin
a6
53
14-
--
0-
11.
012.
01-
--
0-
--
016
.01
Cas
e W
este
rn R
eser
ve U
6
22.
0110
.01
1-
-1
--
-0
2-
-2
--
-0
13.0
1G
eorg
ia In
stitu
te o
f Tec
h13
.01
9.01
426
.02
1-
-1
--
-0
41
-5
--
-0
32.0
2Pu
rdue
Uni
vers
ity12
14
17-
1-
1-
--
04.
011
-5.
01-
--
023
.01
Uni
vers
ity o
f Flo
rida
71
210
--
-0
-1
-1
5-
27
--
-0
18Jo
hns
Hop
kins
U5.
011
410
.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
10.0
1U
of W
ashi
ngto
n10
.01
3.01
114
.02
1-
-1
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
16.0
2U
of I
llino
is U
rban
a-C
ham
64.
012
12.0
1-
--
0-
--
0-
-2
2-
--
014
.01
Mic
higa
n St
ate
U8
1.01
110
.01
-1
-1
-1
-1
2-
1.01
3.01
--
-0
15.0
2U
nive
rsity
of U
tah
8.01
3.01
213
.02
--
-0
-1
-1
1-
-1
--
-0
15.0
2N
M In
st M
inin
g &
Tec
h-
2-
2-
--
0-
--
0-
-2
2-
--
04
U C
A S
anta
Bar
bara
17
11
19-
--
0-
--
01
-1
2-
--
021
Penn
sylv
ania
Sta
te U
8.
014
2.01
14.0
21
--
1-
--
0-
-1
1-
--
016
.02
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ariz
ona
24.
013
9.01
--
-0
-2
-2
--
-0
--
-0
11.0
1O
hio
Stat
e U
43
18
--
-0
--
-0
4.01
11
6.01
--
-0
14.0
1C
olor
ado
Scho
ol o
f Min
es
9.01
42.
0115
.02
--
-0
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
16.0
2U
CA
Dav
is
15.0
32.
013.
0220
.06
--
-0
--
-0
3-
-3
--
-0
23.0
6C
alif
orni
a In
st o
f Tec
h8.
021
-9.
02-
--
0-
--
0-
11
2-
--
011
.02
U C
A B
erke
ley
15.0
11.
012
18.0
2-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
018
.02
Aub
urn
Uni
vers
ity10
.01
13
14.0
1-
--
0-
--
02
1-
3-
--
017
.01
Leh
igh
Uni
vers
ity10
1.01
112
.01
--
-0
2-
-2
2-
13
--
-0
17.0
1C
arne
gie
Mel
lon
U10
25.
0117
.01
--
-0
1-
-1
1-
-1
--
-0
19.0
1U
MA
Am
hers
t 5
32.
0210
.02
--
-0
--
-0
--
2.01
2.01
--
-0
12.0
3M
ichi
gan
Tec
h U
45.
021
10.0
2-
--
0-
--
0-
3-
3-
--
013
.02
Uni
v of
Ala
bam
a4
43.
0111
.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
11.0
1A
rizon
a St
ate
Uni
vers
ity
74.
013.
0214
.03
-1
-1
-1
-1
2-
13
--
-0
19.0
3L
ouis
iana
St U
Sys
tem
165.
023.
0124
.03
--
-0
2-
-2
1-
12
--
-0
28.0
3U
nive
rsity
of C
olor
ado
93.
012.
0114
.02
--
-0
--
-0
-2
-2
--
-0
16.0
2U
of T
enne
ssee
Sys
tem
54
110
--
-0
--
-0
-1.
01-
1.01
--
-0
11.0
1N
orth
wes
tern
Uni
vers
ity9
2.01
4.01
15.0
2-
--
0-
-1.
011.
011
--
1-
--
017
.03
U o
f Mis
sour
i Col
umbi
a-
24.
016.
01-
--
01
--
13
1-
4-
--
011
.01
VA
Pol
ytec
hnic
Inst
74.
022
13.0
2-
--
0-
--
02
1-
3-
--
016
.02
Prin
ceto
n U
nive
rsity
12
.01
1.01
4.01
17.0
3-
--
0-
--
02
--
2-
--
019
.03
Rut
gers
the
Stat
e U
NJ
81.
014.
0113
.02
--
-0
1-
1.01
2.01
21
-3
--
-0
18.0
3C
orne
ll U
nive
rsity
7.
013
-10
.01
-1
-1
--
11
--
22
--
-0
14.0
1U
CA
Los
Ang
eles
7
2-
9-
--
0-
--
01
-1.
012.
01-
--
011
.01
Uni
vers
ity o
f New
Mex
ico
6.01
31
10.0
1-
--
0-
1-
1-
-1
1-
--
012
.01
Ren
ssel
aer P
olyt
ech
Inst
12
1-
13-
--
0-
--
0-
-2
2-
--
015
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n 6
5.03
112
.03
1-
-1
--
-0
2-
-2
--
-0
15.0
3U
of A
laba
ma
Hun
tsvi
lle1
2-
3-
--
01
--
12
--
2-
--
06
Che
m E
ngr
Tot
al42
6.20
141.
2911
1.23
678.
727
**6.
020
13.0
214
85.
0327
.03
56.0
217
.02
29.0
510
2.09
00
00
820.
86P
erce
nt w
ithi
n ra
ce63
%21
%16
%10
0%54
%46
%0%
100%
52%
30%
19%
100%
55%
17%
28%
100%
0%0%
0%0%
Per
cent
of g
rand
tota
l51
.9%
17.2
%13
.6%
82.7
%0.
9%0.
7%0.
0%1.
6%1.
7%1.
0%0.
6%3.
3%6.
8%2.
1%3.
5%12
.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
Fem
ales
in c
olum
n4.
7%20
.5%
20.7
%10
.6%
0.0%
33.2
%0.
0%15
.4%
0.0%
0.0%
59.6
%11
.1%
3.6%
11.8
%17
.2%
8.8%
0%0%
0%0%
10.5
%
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l
Tab
le 5
. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at t
he "
Top
50"
Che
mic
al E
ngin
eeri
ng D
epar
tmen
ts b
y R
ace/
Eth
nici
ty, b
y G
ende
r, a
nd b
y R
ank
(FY
200
2)*
*Acc
ordi
ng to
che
mic
al e
ngin
eerin
g re
sear
ch e
xpen
ditu
res
FY19
99, N
SF; n
umbe
rs a
fter d
ecim
als
desi
gnat
e fe
mal
es. *
*One
pro
fess
or is
repo
rted
in b
oth
chem
istry
& c
hem
ical
eng
inee
ring.
Nat
ive
Am
.W
hite
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Asi
an
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tT
exas
A&
M U
nive
rsity
19.0
0114
9.00
442
.005
1-
-1
1-
3.00
14.
001
41
16
--
-0
53.0
06U
CA
Ber
kele
y24
.001
11.0
015.
001
40.0
03-
--
03.
001
2-
5.00
11
13.
001
5.00
1-
--
050
.005
MA
Inst
itute
of T
ech
21.0
016.
003
5.00
132
.005
-1
-1
11
-2
11
13
--
-0
38.0
05U
TX
at A
ustin
28.0
019.
001
12.0
0549
.007
-1
-1
--
11
--
11
--
-0
52.0
07U
of I
L U
rban
a-C
ham
206.
003
13.0
0139
.004
--
-0
21
14
22
15
--
-0
48.0
04U
nive
rsity
of M
ichi
gan
16.0
013.
002
4.00
123
.004
-1.
001
-1.
001
--
11
2-
-2
--
-0
27.0
05G
eorg
ia In
st o
f Tec
h18
14.0
027.
002
39.0
04-
-2.
001
2.00
12
1-
31
-1.
001
2.00
1-
--
046
.006
SU
NY
at B
uffa
lo7
62
15-
--
0-
--
04
21.
001
7.00
1-
--
022
.001
NC
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
148.
001
3.00
125
.002
--
11
--
11
35
412
--
-0
39.0
02P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
19.0
0112
.001
6.00
137
.003
--
11
11
13
36.
002
211
.002
--
-0
52.0
05U
nive
rsity
of F
lorid
a11
1312
.001
36.0
01-
-1
11
--
15
--
5-
--
043
.001
VA
Pol
ytec
h In
st &
St U
2017
.002
3.00
140
.003
-1
-1
11
24
-1
-1
--
-0
46.0
03P
enns
ylva
nia
Sta
te U
149.
003
7.00
230
.005
--
-0
-1
-1
1-
12
--
-0
33.0
05U
niv
of C
onne
ctic
ut8
6.00
23.
002
17.0
04-
1-
1-
--
0-
1-
1-
--
019
.004
U C
A D
avis
18
.003
52
25.0
031
--
1-
--
01
2-
3-
--
029
.003
Uni
v of
Cin
cinn
ati
49
417
--
-0
--
-0
22
1.00
15.
001
--
-0
22.0
01U
of S
outh
Flo
rida
75.
002
618
.002
--
-0
1-
-1
-1
-1
--
-0
20.0
02U
niv
of M
inne
sota
15.0
028.
001
6.00
129
.004
--
-0
-1
-1
-1
-1
--
-0
31.0
04U
nive
rsity
of U
tah
15.
001
2.00
18.
002
--
11
--
11
-1
-1
--
-0
11.0
02U
of T
enne
ssee
Sys
tem
104
14-
--
0-
--
01
22.
001
5.00
1-
--
019
.001
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ariz
ona
12
47
--
-0
1-
-1
7-
-7
--
-0
15S
tanf
ord
Uni
vers
ity12
.001
6.00
11
19.0
02-
--
01
-1
21
-1
2-
--
023
.002
Ariz
ona
Sta
te U
niv
6.00
15
5.00
216
.003
--
11
--
-0
2-
13
--
-0
20.0
03U
MD
at C
olle
ge P
ark
12.0
014
6.00
122
.002
1-
12
-1.
001
-1.
001
21
14
--
-0
29.0
03U
of I
owa
76.
001
2.00
115
.002
--
-0
1-
-1
32
27
--
-0
23.0
02Io
wa
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
109.
001
7.00
226
.003
--
-0
--
-0
11
4.00
16.
001
--
-0
32.0
04U
of W
ashi
ngto
n18
.002
62.
001
26.0
03-
-1
1-
-1
11
-1
2-
--
030
.003
John
s H
opki
ns U
11
3.00
25.
002
--
-0
--
-0
2-
13
--
-0
8.00
2Lo
uisi
ana
St U
Sys
tem
107.
001
623
.001
--
-0
-1
12
1-
34
--
-0
29.0
01W
est V
irgin
ia U
niv
24
17
--
-0
1-
12
5-
-5
--
-0
14U
niv
of N
ew M
exic
o9
3.00
11.
001
13.0
02-
--
0-
--
02
11
4-
--
017
.002
Cle
mso
n U
nive
rsity
84
618
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
18O
hio
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
7.00
13.
001
7.00
317
.005
1-
-1
--
-0
11
-2
--
-0
20.0
05Le
high
Uni
vers
ity7
3.00
12
12.0
01-
-1
1-
--
02
11
4-
--
017
.001
Mic
higa
n T
ech
Uni
v9
10.0
018.
003
27.0
04-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
027
.004
Uni
vers
ity o
f Del
awar
e8
42
14-
-1
1-
--
03
22
7-
--
022
Cor
nell
Uni
vers
ity17
.002
4.00
15.
004
26.0
07-
--
0-
--
01
--
1-
--
027
.007
Uni
vers
ity o
f Col
orad
o15
.001
96.
001
30.0
02-
--
01
-1
23
1-
4-
--
036
.002
Ren
ssel
aer
Pol
ytec
h In
st8
24.
001
14.0
01-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
014
.001
Dre
xel U
nive
rsity
8.00
12
5.00
215
.003
--
-0
--
-0
-2.
001
-2.
001
--
-0
17.0
04C
olor
ado
Sta
te U
niv
25.0
024
332
.002
--
-0
12
-3
1-
-1
1-
-1
37.0
02T
exas
Tec
h U
nive
rsity
85
316
--
-0
--
-0
21
14
--
-0
20U
of S
o C
alifo
rnia
124
117
--
-0
--
-0
32
-5
--
-0
22U
CA
Irvi
ne7
3.00
13.
002
13.0
03-
--
01
--
13
1.00
1-
4.00
1-
--
018
.004
Ore
gon
Sta
te U
niv
104
7.00
221
.002
--
-0
--
-0
2-
-2
--
-0
23.0
02U
of M
isso
uri C
olum
bia
36
5.00
214
.002
--
-0
--
-0
11
13
--
-0
17.0
02U
of N
B a
t Lin
coln
99
5.00
123
.001
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
23.0
01P
rince
ton
Uni
vers
ity7
2.00
1-
9.00
1-
--
02
--
21
--
1-
--
012
.001
Nor
thw
este
rn U
niv
164.
001
323
.001
--
-0
--
-0
2-
-2
--
-0
25.0
01U
niv
of O
klah
oma
44
2.00
110
.001
--
-0
--
-0
11
-2
--
-0
12.0
01C
ivil
Eng
r T
otal
570.
023
309.
037
226.
057
1105
.117
45.
001
11.0
0120
.002
22.0
0113
.001
16.0
0151
.003
8447
.004
39.0
0617
0.01
01
00
113
47.1
32P
erce
nt w
ithi
n ra
ce52
%28
%20
%10
0%20
%25
%55
%10
0%43
%25
%31
%10
0%49
%28
%23
%10
0%10
0%0%
0%10
0%P
erce
nt o
f gra
nd to
tal
42.3
%22
.9%
16.8
%82
.0%
0.3%
0.4%
0.8%
1.5%
1.6%
1.0%
1.2%
3.8%
6.2%
3.5%
2.9%
12.6
%0.
1%0.
0%0.
0%0.
1%10
0%F
emal
es in
col
umn
4.0%
12.0
%25
.2%
10.6
%0.
0%20
.0%
9.1%
10.0
%4.
5%7.
7%6.
2%5.
9%0.
0%8.
5%15
.4%
5.9%
0%0%
0%0%
9.8%
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l
Tab
le 6
. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at t
he "
Top
50"
Civ
il E
ngin
eeri
ng D
epar
tmen
ts*
by R
ace/
Eth
nici
ty, b
y G
ende
r, a
nd b
y R
ank
(FY
200
2)
*Acc
ordi
ng to
civ
il en
gine
erin
g re
sear
ch e
xpen
ditu
res
FY19
99, N
SF; n
umbe
rs a
fter d
ecim
als
desi
gnat
e fe
mal
es.
Nat
ive
Am
.W
hite
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Asi
an
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tG
eorg
ia In
stitu
te o
f Tec
h 44
.002
23.0
0417
.001
84.0
072
--
2-
-2
27
6.00
13
16.0
01-
--
010
4.00
8Jo
hns
Hop
kins
U
11
11
13-
-1
11
--
1-
11
2-
--
017
U C
A B
erke
ley
23
.001
32
28.0
01-
--
01
--
18.
001
3.00
12
13.0
02-
--
042
.003
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n44
.003
1311
68.0
03-
1-
1-
1-
17.
001
27.
001
16.0
02-
--
086
.005
Pen
nsyl
vani
a S
tate
U
1413
.002
4.00
231
.004
--
-0
11.
001
13.
001
62.
001
19.
001
--
-0
43.0
06S
tanf
ord
Uni
vers
ity
237.
001
8.00
238
.003
-2
-2
1-
-1
6.00
13
312
.001
--
-0
53.0
04U
of I
llino
is U
rban
a36
12.0
0213
.001
61.0
031
1-
2-
1-
114
65
25-
--
089
.003
Uta
h S
tate
Uni
vers
ity
8.
001
6.00
13
17.0
02-
--
0-
--
0-
1-
1-
--
018
.002
MA
Inst
itute
of T
ech
39.0
0310
.001
4.00
153
.005
11
13
2-
-2
93
113
--
-0
71.0
05U
CA
Los
Ang
eles
16.0
014.
001
222
.002
--
-0
11
-2
181
120
--
-0
44.0
02U
of S
outh
ern
Cal
iforn
ia
1.00
1-
-1.
001
-2.
001
-2.
001
-1
-1
41
1.00
16.
001
--
-0
10.0
03U
CA
San
ta B
arba
ra
2
2.00
22
-24
.002
--
-0
--
-0
8.00
12
212
.001
--
-0
36.0
03U
CA
San
Die
go
184.
001
-22
.001
--
-0
1-
-1
134
-17
--
-0
40.0
01P
rince
ton
Uni
vers
ity
131.
001
216
.001
--
-0
--
-0
9.00
11
1.00
111
.002
--
-0
27.0
03P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
35.0
0213
.003
351
.005
--
-0
--
-0
103
3.00
116
.001
--
-0
67.0
06C
orne
ll U
nive
rsity
17
5.00
17.
002
29.0
031
1-
2-
--
03
22
7-
--
038
.003
VA
Pol
ytec
h In
st &
St U
2813
9.00
150
.001
-1
-1
-1
12
9.00
15
418
.001
--
-0
71.0
02U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a
17
8.00
13.
001
28.0
02-
--
0-
2-
21
1-
2-
--
032
.002
U M
D a
t Col
lege
Par
k
36.
001
67.
002
49.0
03-
2.00
1-
2.00
1-
1-
110
26.
001
18.0
01-
--
070
.005
U T
X a
t Aus
tin
3011
.002
344
.002
--
11
1-
-1
91.
001
-10
.001
--
-0
56.0
03N
C S
tate
Uni
vers
ity
21.0
0112
.001
6.00
139
.003
1-
-1
--
-0
4-
15
--
-0
45.0
03R
enss
elae
r P
olyt
ech
Inst
20
63
29-
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
18
-3
11-
--
041
.001
Car
negi
e M
ello
n U
234
5.00
132
.001
11
-2
-1
-1
62
210
--
-0
45.0
01A
rizon
a S
tate
Uni
vers
ity
1512
330
--
-0
-1
-1
7.00
13.
001
7.00
317
.005
--
-0
48.0
05O
hio
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
19.0
0115
.002
438
.003
--
-0
-1
12
25
29
--
-0
49.0
03C
alifo
rnia
Inst
of T
ech
10
.001
1.00
12
13.0
02-
--
0-
--
02
--
2-
--
015
.002
U o
f Sou
th C
arol
ina
5
41
10-
--
0-
1-
12
11
4-
--
015
U W
I-M
adis
on
18.0
017
2.00
127
.002
--
11
2-
-2
22
59
--
-0
39.0
02U
nive
rsity
of K
ansa
s
7
12
10-
--
0-
--
02
-1
3-
--
013
Uni
v of
New
Mex
ico
146.
001
525
.001
--
-0
-1
-1
22.
001
26.
001
--
-0
32.0
02U
nive
rsity
of C
olor
ado
1
5.00
28.
001
427
.003
--
-0
--
11
23.
001
27.
001
--
-0
35.0
04U
nive
rsity
of C
inci
nnat
i
74
213
--
-0
-1
-1
52
18
--
-0
22U
nive
rsity
of M
inne
sota
19
.001
86.
001
0-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
1-
15
3-
8-
--
010
.001
Nor
thea
ster
n U
nive
rsity
1116
.001
330
.001
--
-0
--
-0
3.00
11
15.
001
--
-0
35.0
02Io
wa
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
1210
.001
5.00
127
.002
--
-0
-1.
001
-1.
001
7.00
16
417
.001
--
-0
45.0
04T
exas
Tec
h U
nive
rsity
65.
001
5.00
116
.002
--
-0
--
-0
2.00
1-
-2.
001
--
-0
18.0
03C
lem
son
Uni
vers
ity
12.0
016
422
.001
-1
-1
--
-0
21
14
--
-0
27.0
01R
utge
rs th
e S
tate
U N
J
8.0
025.
001
5.00
118
.004
-3.
001
-3.
001
--
-0
52
18
--
-0
29.0
05U
nive
rsity
of I
L C
hica
go
6-
-6
--
-0
--
-0
9.00
16
318
.001
--
-0
24.0
01N
ew M
exic
o S
tate
Uni
v
7
33
13-
--
02
21
52
11
4-
--
022
Uni
vers
ity o
f Del
awar
e
7
42
13-
1-
11
-1
22
11
4-
--
020
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
11.0
011
2.00
114
.002
--
-0
--
-0
21
14
--
-0
18.0
02N
orth
wes
tern
Uni
vers
ity9.
001
4.00
12
15.0
02-
1.00
1-
1.00
11
-1
25
42
11-
--
029
.003
Cas
e W
este
rn R
eser
ve U
47
112
--
-0
--
-0
1-
12
--
-0
14V
ande
rbilt
Uni
vers
ity6
43
13-
--
0-
--
02
7-
9-
--
022
Tex
as A
&M
Uni
vers
ity20
.001
72
29.0
01-
1.00
1-
1.00
11
1-
29.
001
45
18.0
01-
--
050
.003
U o
f Ala
bam
a H
unts
ville
104.
001
4.00
218
.003
--
-0
1-
-1
31
-4
--
-0
23.0
03U
nive
rsity
of F
lorid
a
12
73
22-
11.
001
2.00
11
1-
27.
001
42
13.0
01-
--
039
.002
U M
A A
mhe
rst
10
12.0
013
25.0
01-
-1
1-
--
05
1.00
11
7.00
1-
--
033
.002
U o
f Mis
sour
i Col
umbi
a
8
611
25-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
025
Ele
ctri
cal E
ngr
Tot
al82
7.03
034
4.03
420
2.02
313
73.0
877
20.0
057.
002
34.0
0718
21.0
0210
.001
49.0
0326
6.01
311
3.00
894
.008
473.
029
00
00
1929
.126
Per
cent
wit
hin
race
60%
25%
15%
100%
21%
59%
21%
100%
37%
43%
20%
100%
56%
24%
20%
100%
0%0%
0%0%
Per
cent
of g
rand
tota
l42
.9%
17.8
%10
.5%
71.2
%0.
4%1.
0%0.
4%1.
8%0.
9%1.
1%0.
5%2.
5%13
.8%
5.9%
4.9%
24.5
%0.
0%0.
0%0.
0%0.
0%10
0%F
emal
es in
col
umn
3.6%
9.9%
11.4
%6.
3%0.
0%25
.0%
28.6
%20
.6%
0.0%
9.5%
10.0
%6.
1%4.
9%7.
1%8.
5%6.
1%0%
0%0%
0%6.
5%
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l
Tab
le 7
. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at t
he "
Top
50"
Ele
ctri
cal E
ngin
eeri
ng D
epar
tmen
ts*
by R
ace/
Eth
nici
ty, b
y G
ende
r, a
nd b
y R
ank
(FY
200
2)
*Acc
ordi
ng to
ele
ctric
al e
ngin
eerin
g re
sear
ch e
xpen
ditu
res
FY19
99, N
SF; n
umbe
rs a
fter d
ecim
als
desi
gnat
e fe
mal
es.
Nat
ive
Am
.W
hite
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Asi
an
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tJo
hns
Hop
kins
U9.
012.
011
12.0
2-
--
0-
--
02
-1.
013.
01-
--
015
.03
Uni
vers
ity o
f Roc
hest
er14
2-
16-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
016
MA
Inst
itute
of T
ech
30.0
16
4.01
40.0
21
-1
2-
--
06
6-
12-
--
054
.02
Geo
rgia
Inst
itute
of T
ech
2816
.01
7.01
51.0
21
1-
2-
-1
17
6.01
1.01
14.0
2-
--
068
.04
U T
X a
t Aus
tin
28
.01
10.0
26.
0244
.05
-2.
01-
2.01
12
25
3-
25
--
-0
56.0
6U
nive
rsity
of M
ichi
gan
12
10.0
37.
0329
.06
1-
-1
--
-0
104.
015
19.0
1-
--
049
.07
Penn
sylv
ania
Sta
te U
22
.01
4.01
5.02
31.0
4-
--
01
--
18
2-
10-
--
042
.04
Stan
ford
Uni
vers
ity
167.
014
27.0
11
1-
2-
-1
11
11
3-
--
033
.01
U o
f Illi
nois
Urb
ana-
Cha
m18
119.
0138
.01
-1
-1
--
-0
1-
45
--
-0
44.0
1U
CA
Los
Ang
eles
20.0
21
-21
.02
--
-0
--
-0
82
-10
--
-0
31.0
2T
exas
A&
M U
nive
rsity
20.0
18
533
.01
--
-0
1-
-1
82
515
--
-0
49.0
1U
MD
at C
olle
ge P
ark
146.
0111
.01
31.0
2-
--
0-
--
03
42
9-
--
040
.02
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ariz
ona
122
317
--
-0
-1
-1
23
-5
--
-0
23U
nive
rsity
of D
ayto
n6.
012
3.01
11.0
2-
--
0-
--
03
--
3-
--
014
.02
VA
Pol
ytec
h In
st &
St U
17.0
19.
015.
0131
.03
1-
-1
1-
-1
22
-4
--
-0
37.0
3SU
NY
at B
uffa
lo11
.01
41
16.0
1-
--
0-
--
02.
015.
012
9.02
--
-0
25.0
3Pu
rdue
Uni
vers
ity
25.0
115
.01
545
.02
--
-0
--
-0
12.
012
5.01
--
-0
50.0
3Fl
orid
a St
ate
Uni
vers
ity7
-1
81
1.01
24.
01-
1-
14
2-
6-
--
019
.01
NC
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
7-
2.02
9.02
1-
12
--
-0
21
2.01
5.01
--
-0
16.0
3O
hio
Stat
e U
nive
rsity
20
63
29-
1-
1-
-1
112
.01
1-
13.0
1-
--
044
.01
Ari
zona
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
9.01
4.01
417
.02
--
-0
--
11
7.01
3-
10.0
1-
--
028
.03
Wes
t Vir
gini
a U
nive
rsity
162
119
--
-0
2-
-2
21
-3
--
-0
24U
of I
owa
62
19
--
-0
--
-0
4-
37
--
-0
16U
nive
rsity
of M
inne
sota
20.0
17.
022.
0129
.04
--
11
--
-0
63
211
--
-0
41.0
4Fl
orid
a In
tern
atio
nal U
33
39
-1
12
--
1.01
1.01
12
-3
--
-0
15.0
1R
utge
rs th
e St
ate
U N
J 8
32.
0113
.01
-1
-1
11
-2
63
312
--
-0
28.0
1U
of A
laba
ma
Hun
tsvi
lle9
5-
14-
--
0-
--
02
--
2-
--
016
Uni
vers
ity o
f Del
awar
e 5
6.01
112
.01
--
-0
--
-0
25
18
--
-0
20.0
1U
nive
rsity
of V
irgin
ia
1012
.01
224
.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
25.0
1M
ichi
gan
Tec
h U
nive
rsity
1111
.01
8.02
30.0
3-
--
0-
--
05
93
17-
--
047
.03
U C
A D
avis
20
.01
11
22.0
1-
2-
2-
--
02
11
4-
--
028
.01
U C
A S
an D
iego
24
.04
44.
0132
.05
--
-0
1-
-1
3.01
1.01
-4.
02-
--
037
.07
Col
orad
o St
ate
Uni
vers
ity
97.
02-
16.0
2-
--
0-
--
0-
2-
2-
--
018
.02
Cas
e W
este
rn R
eser
ve U
8
1.01
110
.01
--
-0
--
-0
31
15
--
-0
15.0
1U
MA
Am
hers
t13
45.
0222
.02
--
-0
--
-0
14
16
--
-0
28.0
2C
arne
gie
Mel
lon
U
93
214
--
-0
1.01
--
1.01
11
2.01
4.01
--
-0
19.0
2U
CA
Irvi
ne14
2.01
319
.01
--
-0
1-
-1
-1
-1
--
-0
21.0
1D
uke
Uni
vers
ity9
7.01
218
.01
--
-0
--
-0
2-
-2
--
-0
20.0
1C
lem
son
Uni
vers
ity
114
7.01
22.0
1-
--
0-
--
0-
-1.
011.
01-
--
023
.02
Uni
vers
ity o
f IL
Chi
cago
112
619
--
-0
--
-0
12.
011
4.01
--
-0
23.0
1L
ouis
iana
Sta
te U
Sys
tem
55
212
--
11
--
-0
32
38
--
-0
21SU
NY
at S
tony
Bro
ok2
12
5-
11.
012.
01-
--
02
53.
0110
.01
--
-0
17.0
2U
of M
isso
uri R
olla
54
413
-1
-1
1-
-1
62
19
--
-0
24Le
high
Uni
vers
ity
223
-25
--
-0
-1
-1
21
-3
--
-0
29C
alif
orni
a In
st o
f Tec
h7.
011
311
.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
11.0
1W
oods
Hol
e O
cean
Inst
99
2.01
20.0
1-
--
0-
--
0-
1-
1-
--
021
.01
Nor
thw
este
rn U
nive
rsity
74.
011
12.0
1-
--
0-
1-
12
2.01
3.01
7.02
--
-0
20.0
3U
nive
rsity
of H
oust
on
93
-12
--
-0
--
-0
33
-6
--
-0
18U
nive
rsity
of C
inci
nnat
i4
41
9-
--
0-
--
02.
013
16.
01-
--
015
.01
U C
A S
anta
Bar
bara
14
.01
44.
0322
.04
--
-0
1-
12
31
-4
--
-0
28.0
4M
echa
nica
l Eng
r T
otal
645.
2024
9.24
156.
2710
50.7
17
13.0
28.
0128
.03
12.0
17
8.01
27.0
215
6.05
102.
0758
.07
316.
190
00
014
21.9
5P
erce
nt w
ithi
n ra
ce61
%24
%15
%10
0%25
%46
%29
%10
0%44
%26
%30
%10
0%49
%32
%18
%10
0%0%
0%0%
0%P
erce
nt o
f gra
nd to
tal
45.4
%17
.5%
11.0
%73
.9%
0.5%
0.9%
0.6%
2.0%
0.8%
0.5%
0.6%
1.9%
11.0
%7.
2%4.
1%22
.2%
0%0%
0%0%
100%
Fem
ales
in c
olum
n3.
1%9.
6%17
.3%
6.8%
0.0%
15.4
%12
.5%
10.7
%8.
3%0.
0%12
.5%
7.4%
3.2%
6.9%
12.1
%6.
0%0%
0%0%
0%6.
7%
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l
Tab
le 8
. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at t
he "
Top
50"
Mec
hani
cal E
ngin
eeri
ng D
epar
tmen
ts*
by R
ace/
Eth
nici
ty, b
y G
ende
r, a
nd b
y R
ank
(FY
200
2)
*Acc
ordi
ng to
mec
hani
cal e
ngin
eerin
g re
sear
ch e
xpen
ditu
res
FY19
99, N
SF; n
umbe
rs a
fter d
ecim
als
desi
gnat
e fe
mal
es.
Nat
ive
Am
.W
hite
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Asi
an
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tH
arva
rd U
nive
rsity
34
.001
39.
001
46.0
021.
001
--
1.00
1-
1-
1-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
049
.004
Pen
nsyl
vani
a S
tate
U
124
117
--
-0
--
2.00
12.
001
5.00
2-
3.00
28.
004
--
-0
27.0
05 U
WI-
Mad
ison
18
.001
39.
002
30.0
03-
--
01
--
11
1-
2-
--
033
.003
Uni
vers
ity o
f Geo
rgia
85
215
--
-0
--
0-
-1
1-
--
016
Geo
rgia
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
7.
001
8.00
48.
003
23.0
08-
11
21
-1
2-
12
3-
--
030
.008
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n
25
3.00
17.
001
35.0
021
--
11
--
1-
16.
002
7.00
2-
--
044
.004
Tex
as A
&M
Uni
vers
ity
133
5.00
121
.001
--
-0
11.
001
-2.
001
3-
14
1-
-1
28.0
02U
of I
ll U
rban
a-C
ham
18
.001
55.
001
28.0
02-
--
01.
001
--
1.00
13
-4.
001
7.00
1-
--
036
.004
Mic
higa
n S
tate
Uni
v26
.003
5.00
14.
001
35.0
05-
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
11
-1.
001
2.00
1-
--
038
.007
Uni
vers
ity o
f Min
neso
ta
14
.001
25.
002
21.0
03-
--
0-
--
02
--
2-
--
023
.003
Uni
vers
ity o
f Flo
rida
13.0
013
3.00
119
.002
--
-0
--
-0
-1
12
--
-0
21.0
02U
of M
isso
uri C
olum
bia
35
2.00
110
.001
--
-0
--
-0
13
26
--
-0
16.0
01U
MD
at C
olle
ge P
ark
16.0
0110
.003
531
.004
1-
-1
4.00
1-
15.
001
1-
2.00
13.
001
--
-0
40.0
06W
ashi
ngto
n S
tate
U
71
1.00
19.
001
-1
-1
--
-0
-1
3.00
14.
001
--
-0
14.0
02P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
41.0
0212
.003
8.00
161
.006
1-
-1
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
62.0
06Io
wa
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
34.0
048
7.00
249
.006
--
-0
--
-0
11
35
--
-0
54.0
06U
CA
Ber
kele
y
37.0
072
342
.007
--
1.00
11.
001
--
11
2-
24
--
-0
48.0
08U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a
12
7.00
11
20.0
01-
-1
11
-1
2-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
024
.002
Okl
ahom
a S
tate
Uni
v22
.002
12
25.0
02-
--
0-
--
01.
001
--
1.00
1-
--
026
.003
Loui
sian
a S
t U S
yste
m
72
3.00
112
.001
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
12.0
01C
orne
ll U
nive
rsity
43
.004
11.0
0212
66.0
06-
--
0-
-1
1-
-3.
003
3.00
3-
--
070
.009
U o
f Neb
rask
a, L
inco
ln8
5.00
22.
001
15.0
03-
--
0-
--
0-
1-
1-
--
016
.003
Ohi
o S
tate
Uni
vers
ity
19
.002
6.00
13
28.0
03-
--
01
--
15
32
10-
--
039
.003
Prin
ceto
n U
nive
rsity
31.0
022
12.0
0145
.003
1.00
1-
-1.
001
--
1.00
11.
001
2-
24
--
-0
51.0
05U
niv
of M
emph
is, T
he
8.00
21
-9.
002
2.00
1-
-2.
001
--
-0
21
14
--
-0
15.0
03U
of T
enne
ssee
Sys
tem
52.
001
411
.001
--
-0
--
-0
1-
23
--
-0
14.0
01N
C S
tate
Uni
vers
ity32
.001
9.00
15
46.0
02-
1-
1-
--
01
-2
3-
--
050
.002
U o
f Pen
nsyl
vani
a**
201
11.0
0232
.002
--
-0
-1
34
21
14
--
-0
40.0
02M
A In
stitu
te o
f Tec
h
23
.001
1.00
19.
001
33.0
03-
--
01
1-
21
--
1-
--
036
.003
Uni
v of
Con
nect
icut
10
.003
10.0
013
23.0
04-
1-
1-
--
01
1-
2-
--
026
.004
Ariz
ona
Sta
te U
niv
143
118
--
-0
3-
14
12.
001
-3.
001
--
-0
25.0
01M
onta
na S
t U B
ozem
an
12
.001
6.00
22
20.0
03-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
020
.003
Indi
ana
Uni
vers
ity
104.
001
317
.001
--
11
--
-0
11
24
--
-0
22.0
01C
arne
gie
Mel
lon
U
8.
001
34
15.0
01-
--
0-
--
01
2-
3-
--
018
.001
Uni
vers
ity o
f Kan
sas
34
2.00
19.
001
--
1.00
11.
001
--
-0
-3
3.00
16.
001
--
-0
16.0
03U
nive
rsity
of O
klah
oma
61
5.00
312
.003
--
11
--
-0
-1
12
--
-0
15.0
03K
ansa
s S
tate
Uni
vers
ity
6
31.
001
10.0
01-
--
0-
--
0-
22
4-
--
014
.001
Geo
rgia
Inst
of T
ech
2.
001
-2
4.00
11
1-
2-
--
0-
2.00
12
4.00
1-
--
010
.002
US
Nav
al P
ostg
rad
Sch
l5
4.00
12.
001
11.0
02-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
011
.002
Tex
as T
ech
Uni
vers
ity
3.
001
6.00
13
12.0
02-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
012
.002
Rut
gers
, Sta
te U
NJ*
*14
.001
6.00
28.
002
28.0
05-
--
0-
1-
13
-1
4-
--
033
.005
U o
f Sou
th C
arol
ina
10
5.00
23.
001
18.0
03-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
018
.003
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
14.0
012
12.0
0228
.003
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
28.0
03C
olum
bia
U T
each
r C
ol**
2-
-2
--
-0
-1
-1
1-
-1
--
-0
4B
row
n U
nive
rsity
141
621
--
-0
1-
-1
12
2.00
15.
001
--
-0
27.0
01N
ew Y
ork
Uni
vers
ity
143
4.00
121
.001
2-
-2
1.00
1-
23.
001
31
37
--
-0
33.0
02U
CA
Los
Ang
eles
25.0
033.
003
11.0
0239
.008
--
-0
--
-0
--
44
--
-0
43.0
08C
ase
Wes
tern
Res
erve
U
3
4.00
25.
001
12.0
03-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
012
.003
Cle
mso
n U
nive
rsity
9
32
14-
--
0-
--
0-
1-
1-
--
015
VA
Pol
ytec
h In
st &
St U
7.00
15.
002
2.00
114
.004
--
-0
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
15.0
04E
cono
mic
s T
otal
747.
050
206.
038
229.
040
1182
.128
10.0
035
6.00
221
.005
17.0
036.
001
15.0
0338
.007
47.0
0334
.002
66.0
1514
7.02
01
00
113
89.1
60P
erce
nt w
ithi
n ra
ce63
%17
%19
%10
0%48
%24
%29
%10
0%45
%16
%39
%10
0%32
%23
%45
%10
0%10
0%0%
0%10
0%P
erce
nt o
f gra
nd to
tal
53.8
%14
.8%
16.5
%85
.1%
0.7%
0.4%
0.4%
1.5%
1.2%
0.4%
1.1%
2.7%
3.4%
2.4%
4.8%
10.6
%0.
1%0%
0%0.
1%10
0%F
emal
es in
col
umn
6.7%
18.4
%17
.5%
10.8
%30
.0%
0%33
.3%
23.8
%17
.6%
16.7
%20
.0%
18.4
%6.
4%5.
9%22
.7%
13.6
%0%
0%0%
0%11
.5%
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l
Tab
le 9
. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at t
he "
Top
50"
Eco
nom
ics
Dep
artm
ents
* by
Rac
e/E
thni
city
, by
Gen
der,
and
by
Ran
k (F
Y 2
002)
*Acc
ordi
ng to
eco
nom
ics
rese
arch
exp
endi
ture
s FY
1999
, NSF
; num
bers
afte
r dec
imal
s de
sign
ate
fem
ales
. *
*No
resp
onse
; dat
a ar
e fr
om o
ther
sou
rces
.
Nat
ive
Am
.W
hite
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Asi
an
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tH
arva
rd U
nive
rsity
29.0
064.
001
10.0
0343
.01
--
-0
1-
-1
11
3.00
25.
002
--
-0
49.0
12U
CA
Ber
kele
y29
.004
12.0
031
42.0
07-
--
0-
--
02
2.00
11
5.00
1-
--
047
.008
Prin
ceto
n U
nive
rsity
**
19.0
023.
001
17.0
0839
.011
--
-0
--
-0
1-
-1
--
-0
40.0
11In
dian
a U
nive
rsity
15.0
037.
002
3.00
125
.006
-2.
001
-2.
001
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
27.0
07R
utge
rs th
e S
tate
U N
J18
.004
8.00
44.
001
30.0
09-
-1
1-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
--
033
.011
U o
f Pen
nsyl
vani
a13
.003
4.00
15.
003
22.0
07-
-1
1-
--
0-
-1
1-
--
024
.007
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n21
.004
7.00
410
.003
38.0
111
-1
2-
--
01.
001
-1.
001
2.00
2-
--
042
.013
U M
D a
t Col
lege
Par
k21
8.00
24.
003
33.0
052
3.00
1-
5.00
1-
--
01
-1.
001
2.00
1-
1-
141
.007
Geo
rge
Mas
on U
niv
79.
003
8.00
424
.007
-3.
002
-3.
002
--
-0
-2
-2
--
-0
29.0
09U
of W
ashi
ngto
n13
.002
10.0
046.
001
29.0
07-
1.00
11.
001
2.00
2-
--
0-
--
0-
--
031
.009
Van
derb
ilt U
nive
rsity
10.0
011
4.00
215
.003
1.00
1-
-1.
001
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
16.0
04N
orth
wes
tern
Uni
v13
.003
8.00
28.
004
29.0
09-
11
2-
--
01
1-
2-
--
033
.009
Car
negi
e M
ello
n U
1-
23
--
1.00
11.
001
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
4.00
1U
of S
outh
Car
olin
a18
.004
8.00
17.
003
33.0
081
--
1-
--
01
--
1-
--
035
.008
Duk
e U
nive
rsity
14.0
024.
001
624
.003
1.00
1-
-1.
001
--
-0
-2
-2
--
-0
27.0
04T
exas
A&
M U
niv
**20
.002
3.00
19.
004
32.0
072
--
2-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
1-
1-
--
036
.008
Uni
vers
ity o
f Chi
cago
13.0
039
5.00
127
.004
11.
001
1.00
13.
002
--
11
-1
-1
--
-0
32.0
06G
eorg
etow
n U
nive
rsity
18.0
0212
.001
6.00
136
.004
--
11
11
-2
-1
1.00
12.
001
--
-0
41.0
05T
ufts
Uni
vers
ity3
6.00
24.
002
13.0
04-
2.00
21
3.00
2-
--
0-
-1
1-
--
017
.006
U C
A S
an D
iego
19.0
026.
001
429
.003
1.00
1-
-1.
001
1-
-1
--
-0
--
-0
31.0
04M
A In
stitu
te o
f Tec
h10
.001
74.
001
21.0
02-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
--
01.
001
11.
001
3.00
2-
--
025
.005
Mic
higa
n S
tate
Uni
v15
.003
85.
001
28.0
041
2-
3-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
0-
--
032
.005
Uni
vers
ity o
f Geo
rgia
13.0
0112
.001
7.00
232
.004
--
2.00
12.
001
--
-0
1-
-1
--
-0
35.0
05F
lorid
a S
tate
Uni
v8
8.00
25.
002
21.0
04-
1-
11
--
1-
1-
1-
--
024
.004
New
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
16.0
016.
001
4.00
226
.004
-1
-1
--
-0
1-
23
--
-0
30.0
04U
CA
Irvi
ne16
.004
7.00
32
25.0
071.
001
--
1.00
1-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
1.00
12.
001
3.00
2-
--
030
.011
Cle
mso
n U
nive
rsity
4-
2.00
26.
002
-1
-1
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
8.00
2U
of I
owa
115.
001
5.00
221
.003
--
-0
-1
1.00
12.
001
1-
12
--
-0
25.0
04U
of M
isso
uri S
t Lou
is7.
002
24.
001
13.0
03-
3.00
2-
3.00
2-
1-
1-
--
0-
--
017
.005
U C
A D
avis
86.
002
3.00
117
.003
--
-0
--
-0
--
1.00
11.
001
--
-0
18.0
04G
eorg
e W
ashi
ngto
n U
16.0
0214
.004
6.00
236
.008
--
-0
--
-0
-2.
001
-2.
001
--
-0
38.0
09U
niv
of M
inne
sota
11.0
026.
003
10.0
0327
.008
1-
-1
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
28.0
08V
A P
olyt
ch In
st &
St U
7.00
14.
001
3.00
114
.003
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
11
15.0
03O
hio
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
13.0
026.
002
10.0
0429
.008
1-
12
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
32.0
08P
enns
ylva
nia
Sta
te U
712
.004
-19
.004
--
-0
--
-0
-1.
001
-1.
001
--
-0
20.0
05S
UN
Y a
t Alb
any
11.0
018.
002
1.00
120
.004
--
-0
-1
-1
1-
-1
--
-0
22.0
04U
niv
of N
ew M
exic
o4.
001
6.00
22
12.0
03-
--
01
1.00
1-
2.00
1-
--
0-
--
014
.004
Uni
v of
Okl
ahom
a7
7.00
111
.006
25.0
071
--
1-
--
0-
-1
1-
--
027
.007
U o
f Mis
sour
i Col
umbi
a6.
001
6.00
18.
005
20.0
072
1.00
1-
3.00
1-
--
01
--
1-
--
024
.008
U o
f Sou
ther
n C
alifo
rnia
56.
005
213
.005
1-
-1
--
-0
--
2.00
12.
001
--
-0
16.0
06U
WI-
Mad
ison
24.0
043.
002
10.0
0137
.007
--
1.00
11.
001
1-
-1
--
2.00
22.
002
--
-0
41.0
10N
ew S
choo
l Uni
vers
ity4.
001
2.00
11.
001
7.00
31
--
1-
--
0-
-2.
001
2.00
1-
--
010
.004
Ariz
ona
Sta
te U
niv
11.0
027.
003
1.00
119
.006
-1
-1
-1
34
1-
1.00
12.
001
--
-0
26.0
07G
eorg
ia S
tate
Uni
v1
5.00
110
.001
16.0
02-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
--
0-
-1
1-
--
018
.003
Wes
tern
Mic
higa
n U
56.
001
5.00
216
.003
-1.
001
-1.
001
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
17.0
04U
S N
aval
Pos
tgra
d S
chl
7.00
16.
001
417
.002
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
17.0
02U
of I
L U
rban
a-C
ham
7.00
17.
002
5.00
119
.004
1.00
11.
001
13.
002
-1
-1
11.
001
1.00
13.
002
--
-0
26.0
08U
of T
enne
ssee
Sys
tem
7.00
14.
001
3.00
214
.004
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
14.0
04U
of N
ebra
ska
at L
inco
ln6
7.00
23.
001
16.0
031
-2.
001
3.00
1-
--
0-
--
0-
--
019
.004
U M
A B
osto
n6.
002
8.00
214
.004
11
-2
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
17.0
04P
olit
ical
Sci
ence
Tot
al58
7.08
132
0.08
525
9.09
011
66.2
5622
.005
28.0
1516
.006
66.0
266
8.00
28.
004
22.0
0616
.002
20.0
0628
.014
64.0
220
11
213
20.3
10P
erce
nt w
ithi
n ra
ce50
%27
%22
%10
0%33
%42
%24
%10
0%27
%36
%36
%10
0%25
%31
%44
%10
0%0%
0%0%
0%P
erce
nt o
f gra
nd to
tal
44.5
%24
.2%
19.6
%88
.3%
1.7%
2.1%
1.2%
5.0%
0.5%
0.6%
0.6%
1.7%
1.2%
1.5%
2.1%
4.8%
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
0.2%
100%
Fem
ales
in c
olum
n13
.8%
26.6
%34
.7%
22.0
%22
.7%
53.6
%37
.5%
39.4
%0.
0%25
.0%
50.0
%27
.3%
12.5
%30
.0%
50.0
%34
.4%
0%0.
0%0%
0%23
.5%
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l
Tab
le 1
0. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at t
he "
Top
50"
Pol
itic
al S
cien
ce D
epar
tmen
ts*
by R
ace/
Eth
nici
ty, b
y G
ende
r, a
nd b
y R
ank
(FY
200
2)
*Acc
ordi
ng to
pol
itica
l sci
ence
rese
arch
exp
endi
ture
s FY
1999
, NSF
; num
bers
afte
r dec
imal
s de
sign
ate
fem
ales
. *
*Dec
lined
to p
artic
ipat
e; d
ata
are
from
oth
er s
ourc
es.
Nat
ive
Am
.W
hite
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Asi
an
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tB
rand
eis
Uni
vers
ity
5.00
12.
002
29.
003
--
1.00
11.
001
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
10.0
04U
nive
rsity
of M
ichi
gan
15.0
028.
005
4.00
327
.01
2-
24
-1.
001
-1.
001
2-
3.00
35.
003
--
-0
37.0
14P
enns
ylva
nia
Sta
te U
17
.001
4.00
26.
004
27.0
07-
1-
1-
1-
1-
--
0-
--
029
.007
Iow
a S
tate
Uni
vers
ity
18
.006
7.00
39.
006
34.0
151.
001
-1.
001
2.00
2-
-1
1-
--
0-
--
037
.017
U o
f NC
Cha
pel H
ill
17.0
051
422
.005
--
1.00
11.
001
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
24.0
06U
CA
Ber
kele
y
19.0
072.
001
2.00
123
.009
11
-2
11.
001
-2.
001
-1.
001
-1.
001
--
-0
28.0
11U
nive
rsity
of A
rizon
a
8.
002
4.00
33.
001
15.0
061
--
11
--
1-
--
0-
--
017
.006
U W
I-M
adis
on
18.0
066
13.0
0537
.011
1-
12
--
-0
2.00
1-
1.00
13.
002
1-
-1
43.0
13U
of P
enns
ylva
nia
17
.006
1.00
15.
002
23.0
092
-1.
001
3.00
1-
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
027
.011
U C
A S
an D
iego
12
.002
8.00
35.
001
25.0
061.
001
1-
2.00
1-
1-
1-
-0
--
-0
28.0
07U
CA
Los
Ang
eles
25.0
055.
001
6.00
536
.011
2-
-2
22.
001
15.
001
1.00
11
-2.
001
1-
-1
46.0
13U
TX
at A
ustin
18
.004
4.00
26.
003
28.0
091
-1.
001
2.00
11
--
1-
1-
1-
--
032
.010
Indi
ana
Uni
vers
ity
15.0
034.
003
5.00
324
.009
-1.
001
12.
001
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
27.0
10D
uke
Uni
vers
ity
10
.003
-5.
003
15.0
06-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
-1
12
1-
3-
--
020
.007
Flo
rida
Inte
rnat
iona
l U10
.002
10.0
051.
001
21.0
08-
1-
11.
001
21.
001
4.00
2-
--
0-
--
026
.010
Indi
ana
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
2
2.00
12.
001
6.00
2-
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
11
--
1-
--
08.
003
Col
umbi
a U
in C
ity o
f NY
11.0
013.
002
3.00
117
.004
--
1.00
11.
001
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
19.0
05Jo
hns
Hop
kins
U5
1.00
1-
6.00
1-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
--
0-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
--
08.
003
Uni
vers
ity o
f Col
orad
o6.
001
4.00
1-
10.0
02-
--
0-
--
01
-1
2-
--
012
.002
Geo
rgia
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
6.
001
3.00
28.
004
17.0
07-
-2.
001
2.00
1-
--
0-
11.
001
2.00
1-
--
021
.009
Rut
gers
the
Sta
te U
NJ
12.0
0415
.009
6.00
433
.017
-2.
001
1.00
13.
002
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
36.0
19U
of I
L U
rban
a-C
ham
3
2.00
15.
004
10.0
05-
1.00
12.
001
3.00
2-
11
2-
13
4-
--
019
.007
SU
NY
at A
lban
y
10
.002
11.0
042
23.0
06-
1-
11
--
1-
--
0-
--
025
.006
Tex
as T
ech
Uni
vers
ity3
3.00
12.
001
8.00
2-
--
0-
--
01
--
1-
--
09.
002
Was
hing
ton
Sta
te U
***
9.00
15.
001
6.00
220
.004
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
20.0
04U
nive
rsity
of A
kron
6.
001
4.00
33.
001
13.0
05-
-2
2-
--
01
1.00
1-
2.00
1-
--
017
.006
Uni
vers
ity o
f Del
awar
e
15
.007
7.00
33.
001
25.0
111.
001
--
1.00
11
--
1-
--
0-
--
027
.012
Tem
ple
Uni
vers
ity
8.
003
3.00
23.
003
14.0
08-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
--
0-
1-
1-
--
016
.009
U o
f Iow
a
4.
002
5.00
34.
003
13.0
08-
--
0-
--
01
--
1-
--
014
.008
Flo
rida
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
11
.003
4.00
27.
003
22.0
08-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
022
.008
U M
D a
t Col
lege
Par
k14
.005
6.00
24.
002
24.0
09-
11.
001
2.00
1-
1-
1-
1.00
11
2.00
1-
--
029
.011
U o
f Sou
th C
arol
ina
9.
002
1.00
11
11.0
031
--
1-
--
01
--
1-
--
013
.003
Uni
vers
ity o
f IL
Chi
cago
5
5.00
26.
005
16.0
071
1.00
11
3.00
1-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
11
2-
--
022
.009
Geo
rget
own
Uni
vers
ity
3.
001
3.00
11.
001
7.00
31.
001
--
1.00
1-
-1
1-
--
0-
--
09.
004
U o
f New
Ham
pshi
re
5.00
13.
002
5.00
313
.006
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
13.0
06U
S N
aval
Pos
tgra
d S
chl
11
-2
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
2O
hio
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
12.0
0410
.005
7.00
429
.013
1.00
11
-2.
001
-1
-1
-1
-1
--
-0
33.0
14U
nive
rsity
of G
eorg
ia
7.
002
47.
003
18.0
05-
-2.
001
2.00
1-
--
0-
--
0-
--
020
.006
Pur
due
Uni
vers
ity
11
.001
14.0
064.
002
29.0
09-
11.
001
2.00
1-
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
032
.011
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ken
tuck
y
8.
001
10.0
054.
001
22.0
071.
001
1.00
1-
2.00
2-
--
0-
--
0-
--
024
.009
U o
f Neb
rask
a at
Lin
coln
7.
003
1.00
13.
003
11.0
07-
1-
1-
12.
002
3.00
2-
--
0-
--
015
.009
Uni
vers
ity o
f Min
neso
ta
10
.005
48.
003
22.0
08-
--
0-
--
0-
11.
001
2.00
1-
--
024
.009
Loui
sian
a S
tate
U S
yste
m
8.00
23
213
.002
1-
-1
--
-0
-2
13
--
-0
17.0
02U
of S
outh
ern
Cal
iforn
ia6.
001
22.
002
10.0
03-
1.00
11.
001
2.00
2-
1.00
11
2.00
1-
1-
1-
--
015
.006
Uni
v of
Mem
phis
5.00
15.
003
2.00
112
.005
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
12.0
05M
ichi
gan
Sta
te U
niv*
*11
.003
43.
001
18.0
042.
001
-1
3.00
12.
001
--
2.00
1-
--
0-
--
023
.006
U o
f Mis
sour
i Col
umbi
a9.
002
-3.
002
12.0
04-
1.00
11.
001
2.00
2-
--
0-
1-
1-
--
015
.006
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mia
mi
32.
001
4.00
49.
005
21.
001
-3.
001
--
1.00
11.
001
--
-0
--
-0
13.0
07C
orne
ll U
nive
rsity
6.
002
4.00
24.
003
14.0
07-
--
0-
--
01
--
1-
--
015
.007
Uni
vers
ity o
f Chi
cago
**11
.002
13.
001
15.0
03-
-1
1-
--
01
-1
2-
--
018
.003
Soci
olog
y T
otal
486.
119
221.
098
203.
107
910.
324
23.0
0721
.011
26.0
1470
.032
1013
.004
12.0
135
.012
15.0
0219
.004
17.0
0851
.014
20
02
1068
.382
Per
cent
wit
hin
race
53%
24%
22%
100%
33%
30%
37%
100%
29%
37%
34%
100%
29%
37%
33%
100%
0%0%
0%0%
Per
cent
of g
rand
tota
l45
.5%
20.7
%19
.0%
85.2
%2.
2%2.
0%2.
4%6.
6%0.
9%1.
2%1.
1%3.
3%1.
4%1.
8%1.
6%4.
8%0.
2%0%
0%0.
2%10
0%F
emal
es in
col
umn
24.5
%44
.3%
52.7
%35
.6%
30.4
%52
.4%
53.8
%45
.7%
20.0
%30
.8%
50.0
%34
.3%
13.3
%21
.1%
47.1
%27
.5%
0%0%
0%0%
35.8
%
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l
Tab
le 1
1. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at t
he "
Top
50"
Soc
iolo
gy D
epar
tmen
ts*
by R
ace/
Eth
nici
ty, b
y G
ende
r, a
nd b
y R
ank
(FY
200
2)
*Acc
ordi
ng to
soc
iolo
gy re
sear
ch e
xpen
ditu
res
FY19
99, N
SF; n
umbe
rs a
fter d
ecim
als
desi
gnat
e fe
mal
es.
**D
eclin
ed to
par
ticip
ate;
dat
a ar
e fr
om o
ther
sou
rces
. **
*No
resp
onse
; dat
a ar
e fr
om o
ther
sou
rces
.
Nat
ive
Am
.W
hite
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Asi
an
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tU
WI-
Mad
ison
22.
009
3.00
28.
001
33.0
12-
-2.
001
2.00
1-
--
0-
--
0-
--
035
.013
Uni
v of
Okl
ahom
a
6
3.00
17.
005
16.0
06-
--
01
-1.
001
2.00
1-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
019
.008
Pen
n S
tate
Uni
v***
20.0
0712
.004
8.00
440
.015
--
2.00
22.
002
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
42.0
17U
of W
ashi
ngto
n
20.0
068.
004
9.00
537
.015
-1
-1
2.00
11
-3.
001
-3.
001
-3.
001
--
-0
44.0
17U
CA
Los
Ang
eles
37.0
116.
002
9.00
252
.015
3.00
1-
-3.
001
2-
13
2.00
21.
001
2.00
15.
004
--
-0
63.0
20In
dian
a U
nive
rsity
23.
004
8.00
17.
004
38.0
09-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
038
.009
Uni
v of
Mic
higa
n45
.018
11.0
089.
003
65.0
293.
001
16.
005
10.0
062
2.00
12.
002
6.00
3-
2.00
17.
004
9.00
5-
-1.
001
1.00
191
.044
Rut
gers
the
St U
NJ
6.00
13.
001
5.00
214
.004
--
-0
--
-0
1.00
1-
-1.
001
--
-0
15.0
05G
eorg
ia S
tate
Uni
v8.
003
9.00
58.
005
25.0
13-
3-
31
-1
2-
-1
1-
--
031
.013
Uni
v of
Col
orad
o26
.006
9.00
29.
001
44.0
09-
--
0-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
-3.
002
3.00
2-
--
048
.012
U o
f IL
Urb
ana-
Cha
m32
.007
10.0
056.
001
48.0
13-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
-1
1-
-2.
002
2.00
2-
--
052
.016
Uni
v of
Mem
phis
183
5.00
226
.002
-1
-1
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
28.0
02U
niv
of M
inne
sota
20.0
037.
003
7.00
234
.008
--
-0
--
-0
--
33
--
-0
37.0
08U
CA
Ber
kele
y
26
.007
4.00
24.
001
34.0
11
--
11
--
11
-2.
001
3.00
1-
--
039
.011
Uni
v of
Geo
rgia
19.0
049.
002
9.00
437
.01
-2.
002
-2.
002
1.00
1-
-1.
001
--
11
--
-0
41.0
13U
of S
outh
Flo
rida
21.0
029.
006
4.00
234
.01
-1
-1
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
36.0
10C
orne
ll U
nive
rsity
18.
006
24
24.0
06-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
024
.006
Car
negi
e M
ello
n U
14.0
043.
002
5.00
422
.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
22.0
10U
niv
of R
oche
ster
10.0
022
2.00
214
.004
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
14.0
04U
niv
of M
iam
i **
14.0
046.
004
323
.008
--
-0
1.00
1-
4.00
15.
002
--
-0
--
-0
28.0
10A
rizon
a S
tate
Uni
v28
.005
8.00
35.
004
41.0
12-
--
03.
001
3.00
2-
6.00
3-
11.
001
2.00
1-
--
049
.016
U o
f Con
nect
icut
**
25.0
0512
.005
7.00
444
.014
--
1.00
11.
001
--
11
--
11
--
-0
47.0
15S
UN
Y a
t Buf
falo
10.0
039.
003
6.00
325
.009
--
-0
--
1.00
11.
001
--
-0
--
-0
26.0
10P
rince
ton
Uni
v19
.006
-2.
001
21.0
07-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
0-
-1
1-
--
023
.008
OR
Hea
lth S
ci U
***
2.00
1-
-2.
001
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
2.00
1U
AL
Birm
ingh
am13
.004
8.00
24.
002
25.0
08-
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
027
.010
U C
A S
an D
iego
16.0
043.
001
6.00
225
.007
--
-0
--
1.00
11.
001
1-
-1
--
-0
27.0
08N
ew Y
ork
Uni
v25
.009
9.00
21
35.0
11-
2.00
1-
2.00
1-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
-1
1-
--
039
.013
Flo
rida
Sta
te U
niv
19.0
038.
002
7.00
334
.008
--
-0
2.00
1-
-2.
001
--
11
--
-0
37.0
09H
arva
rd U
nive
rsity
14.0
043.
002
4.00
221
.008
--
-0
--
-0
2.00
11.
001
-3.
002
--
-0
24.0
10U
of N
ew M
exic
o13
.004
4.00
23.
001
20.0
07-
--
01
1-
2-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
023
.008
Uni
v of
Flo
rida
12.0
056.
001
3.00
121
.007
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
21.0
07U
niv
of P
ittsb
urgh
15.0
0410
.001
4.00
229
.007
1.00
1-
-1.
001
--
-0
1.00
1-
-1.
001
--
-0
31.0
09S
an D
iego
St U
niv
24.0
089.
006
9.00
542
.019
--
-0
-2.
001
1.00
13.
002
--
1.00
11.
001
--
-0
46.0
22U
niv
of IL
Chi
cago
12
.003
10.0
035.
001
27.0
07-
12.
001
3.00
1-
2.00
1-
2.00
1-
--
0-
1.00
1-
1.00
133
.010
U o
f Rho
de Is
land
19.0
063.
001
2.00
224
.009
-1.
001
2.00
13.
002
--
-0
--
1.00
11.
001
--
-0
28.0
12D
uke
Uni
vers
ity
12.
002
2.00
14.
002
18.0
05-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
018
.005
Tem
ple
Uni
v***
21.0
064.
001
7.00
132
.008
-1
-1
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
33.0
08U
of M
O C
olum
bia
1
1.00
96.
002
11.0
0628
.017
--
-0
-1.
001
2.00
13.
002
--
-0
--
-0
31.0
19S
tanf
ord
Uni
vers
ity
16
.004
4.00
14.
002
24.0
072
--
2-
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
027
.008
U M
A A
mhe
rst
36.0
115.
005
3.00
244
.018
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
-1
-1
45.0
18U
of S
o C
alifo
rnia
18
.003
9.00
34.
001
31.0
07-
-1
1-
--
0-
11
2-
--
034
.007
U o
f Sou
th C
arol
ina
17
.003
4.00
24.
001
25.0
06-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
0-
--
027
.008
Ohi
o S
tate
Uni
v31
.008
19.0
054.
002
54.0
15-
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
11
2.00
1-
3.00
1-
--
058
.017
Yal
e U
nive
rsity
13.0
031
11.0
0325
.006
--
-0
--
-0
1.00
1-
-1.
001
--
-0
26.0
07U
of P
enns
ylva
nia
17.0
043.
001
5.00
325
.008
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
--
-0
26.0
08G
eorg
ia In
st o
f Tec
h11
.003
4.00
14
19.0
04-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
0-
--
0-
--
020
.005
John
s H
opki
ns U
5.00
1-
4.00
29.
003
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
9.00
3S
UN
Y B
ingh
amto
n
14
.003
3.00
37.
003
24.0
09-
--
0-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
--
0-
1.00
1-
1.00
126
.011
Col
orad
o S
tate
U17
.001
5.00
55.
002
27.0
08-
--
01
-1.
001
2.00
1-
1-
11
--
131
.009
Psy
chol
ogy
Tot
al91
0.23
929
8.11
827
3.11
314
81.4
7010
.003
14.0
0420
.015
44.0
2218
.005
15.0
0921
.012
54.0
2610
.006
14.0
0533
.017
57.0
281
3.00
21.
001
5.00
316
41.5
49P
erce
nt w
ithi
n ra
ce61
%20
%18
%10
0%23
%32
%45
%10
0%33
%28
%39
%10
0%18
%25
%58
%10
0%20
%60
%20
%10
0%P
erce
nt o
f gra
nd to
tal
55.5
%18
.2%
16.6
%90
.2%
0.6%
0.9%
1.2%
2.7%
1.1%
0.9%
1.3%
3.3%
0.6%
0.9%
2.0%
3.5%
0.1%
0.2%
0.1%
0.3%
100%
Fem
ales
in c
olum
n26
.3%
39.6
%41
.4%
31.7
%30
.0%
28.6
%75
.0%
50.0
%27
.8%
60.0
%57
.1%
48.1
%60
.0%
35.7
%51
.5%
49.1
%0%
66.7
%10
0%60
.0%
33.5
%
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l
Tab
le 1
2. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at t
he "
Top
50"
Psy
chol
ogy
Dep
artm
ents
* by
Rac
e/E
thni
city
, by
Gen
der,
and
by
Ran
k (F
Y 2
002)
*Acc
ordi
ng to
psy
chol
ogy
rese
arch
exp
endi
ture
s FY
1999
, NSF
; num
bers
afte
r dec
imal
s de
sign
ate
fem
ales
. *
*Dec
lined
to p
artic
ipat
e; d
ata
are
from
oth
er s
ourc
es. *
**N
o re
spon
se; d
ata
are
from
oth
er s
ourc
es.
Nat
ive
Am
.W
hite
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Asi
an
Tot
alU
nive
rsit
yFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tFu
llA
ssoc
Ass
tTo
tB
aylo
r Col
of M
edic
ine
43.0
0829
.011
21.0
1093
.029
--
11
11
24
5.00
2-
10.0
0115
.003
--
-0
113.
032
Was
hing
ton
Uni
vers
ity47
.006
7.00
134
.006
88.0
13-
-1
11
-2
34
-4.
001
8.00
1-
--
010
0.01
4U
of P
enns
ylva
nia
19.0
030
8.00
427
.007
--
-0
--
-0
1.00
1-
12.
001
--
-0
29.0
08R
ocke
felle
r Uni
v11
.001
22.
001
15.0
02-
--
0-
--
0-
11
2-
--
017
.002
Har
vard
Uni
vers
ity61
.009
611
.002
78.0
111
--
11
--
12.
002
1.00
11
4.00
3-
--
084
.014
U o
f Was
hing
ton
56.0
0914
.008
10.0
0380
.020
-1
-1
12
-3
1.00
11
3.00
25.
003
--
-0
89.0
23U
WI-
Mad
ison
69.0
0717
.004
19.0
1010
5.02
1-
--
02
-2
4-
-2.
002
2.00
2-
--
011
1.02
3Jo
hns
Hop
kins
U16
.003
6.00
43.
001
25.0
08-
--
02
--
22.
001
-1.
001
3.00
2-
--
030
.010
Texa
s A
&M
Uni
vers
ity80
.007
42.0
0619
.004
141.
017
--
-0
-1.
001
56.
001
--
2.00
12.
001
--
-0
149.
019
U C
A B
erke
ley
93.0
1828
.010
16.0
0613
7.03
41
11.
001
3.00
13
11
58.
004
41
13.0
04-
--
015
8.03
9U
of N
C C
hape
l Hill
40.0
1010
.003
13.0
0463
.017
-1.
001
-1.
001
--
-0
-1
23
--
-0
67.0
18Y
ale
Uni
vers
ity21
.004
8.00
25.
002
34.0
08-
--
0-
--
01
-4.
001
5.00
1-
--
039
.009
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n19
.001
8.00
3-
27.0
04-
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
-1
1-
--
029
.005
Col
umbi
a U
in C
ity, N
Y40
.008
11.0
025
56.0
10-
--
0-
--
0-
25.
002
7.00
2-
--
063
.012
U T
X S
W M
ed C
tr, D
alla
s18
.003
2.00
112
.002
32.0
06-
--
01
22.
001
5.00
13
11
5-
--
042
.007
Tufts
Uni
vers
ity6.
002
7.00
24.
003
17.0
07-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
-1
11.
001
--
1.00
1-
--
020
.009
U T
X M
D A
nder
son
Cnc
r 4.
001
56.
002
15.0
03-
1.00
11
2.00
1-
--
02.
001
1.00
11
4.00
2-
--
021
.006
Uni
vers
ity o
f Geo
rgia
***
104.
015
32.0
0829
.009
165.
032
-1
-1
--
-0
24
4.00
210
.002
--
-0
176.
034
U o
f AL,
Birm
ingh
am20
.003
11.0
015.
001
36.0
05-
--
0-
--
02
1-
3-
--
039
.005
U C
A D
avis
***
5024
.005
17.0
0691
.011
--
-0
1-
-1
32.
002
1.00
16.
003
--
-0
98.0
14D
uke
Uni
vers
ity18
.001
10.0
016.
002
34.0
04-
--
0-
--
01.
001
2.00
21
4.00
3-
--
038
.007
NC
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
***
49.0
1019
.002
13.0
0281
.014
1-
1.00
12.
001
--
-0
--
2.00
12.
001
11
-2
87.0
16V
ande
rbilt
Uni
vers
ity30
.002
12.0
0310
.001
52.0
06-
--
0-
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
1-
--
053
.007
Mic
higa
n St
ate
U61
.009
18.0
0727
.011
106.
027
2-
-2
3-
14
63.
002
312
.002
--
-0
124.
029
Penn
sylv
ania
Sta
te U
42.0
0616
.002
10.0
0368
.011
--
22
--
-0
42
7.00
113
.001
--
-0
83.0
12U
of M
inne
sota
***
73.0
1522
.009
20.0
0611
5.03
0-
--
0-
-1
14.
001
-5.
002
9.00
3-
--
012
5.03
3M
A In
stitu
te o
f Tec
h29
.005
10.0
048.
003
47.0
12-
--
0-
--
03
21
6-
--
053
.012
Nor
thw
este
rn U
34.0
037.
001
15.0
0656
.010
--
-0
2.00
1-
1.00
13.
002
71
210
--
-0
69.0
12U
nive
rsity
of F
lorid
a68
.009
30.0
1019
.003
117.
022
11
13
-1
-1
22
8.00
412
.004
--
-0
133.
026
Loui
sian
a St
U S
yste
m85
.008
40.0
0826
.007
151.
023
-1
1.00
12.
001
1-
-1
11
24
--
-0
158.
024
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ariz
ona*
**70
.013
30.0
0718
.008
118.
028
-1
-1
--
1.00
11.
001
13
-4
--
-0
124.
029
U M
ed &
Den
t of N
J24
.008
6.00
59.
001
39.0
14-
1.00
1-
1.00
1-
--
02
15.
002
8.00
2-
--
048
.017
Cor
nell
Uni
vers
ity98
.012
28.0
0827
.010
153.
032
--
2-
-3.
002
3.00
27.
002
4.00
18.
003
19.0
06-
--
017
7.03
8M
t Sin
ai S
ch M
ed7.
001
35
15.0
01-
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
13.
001
12.
001
6.00
2-
--
022
.004
U C
A Ir
vine
***
47.0
098.
001
1267
.010
1-
-1
3-
-3
42.
001
2.00
18.
002
--
-0
79.0
12SU
NY
at B
uffa
lo28
.003
10.0
027.
004
45.0
091.
001
--
1.00
11
-1.
001
2.00
12
12
5-
--
053
.011
U C
A L
os A
ngel
es18
.002
16.
001
25.0
03-
--
02.
001
--
2.00
1-
--
0-
--
027
.004
Ohi
o St
ate
Uni
vers
ity41
.003
28.0
0523
.007
92.0
15-
11.
001
2.00
1-
-1
16.
001
5.00
32
13.0
04-
--
010
8.02
0C
ase
Wes
tern
Res
U**
82
-10
-1
-1
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
11Pu
rdue
Uni
vers
ity80
.008
29.0
0424
.009
133.
021
1-
-1
-1
12
41
510
--
11
147.
021
SUN
Y a
t Sto
ny B
rook
1010
.004
323
.004
--
-0
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
24.0
04U
TX
Med
Br a
t Gal
vest
on11
12
141
--
1-
--
04
1.00
12.
002
7.00
3-
--
022
.003
New
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
9.00
47.
001
4.00
120
.006
--
-0
1-
-1
--
-0
--
-0
21.0
06U
nive
rsity
of C
inci
nnat
i13
.003
8.00
24.
001
25.0
06-
--
0-
--
01.
001
--
1.00
1-
--
026
.007
Uni
vers
ity o
f Kan
sas*
**22
.004
16.0
047.
002
45.0
101
--
0-
-1.
001
1.00
11
11
3-
1-
150
.011
Emor
y U
nive
rsity
24.0
048.
002
14.0
0446
.010
1-
12
--
11
34
3.00
210
.002
--
-0
59.0
12U
nive
rsity
of C
olor
ado
36.0
0610
.004
11.0
0257
.012
1-
-1
1-
-1
-1
5.00
36.
003
--
-0
65.0
15R
utge
rs th
e St
ate
U N
J32
.006
24.0
0613
.003
69.0
15-
--
02
-1.
001
3.00
14
4-
8-
--
080
.016
Tho
mas
Jef
fers
on U
32.0
1115
.003
10.0
0357
.017
--
-0
--
-0
4.00
12.
001
28.
002
--
-0
65.0
19SU
NY
at A
lban
y17
.002
8.00
12
27.0
03-
--
0-
1-
1-
1.00
11
2.00
1-
--
030
.004
Bio
logi
cal S
cien
ces
Tot
al19
33.2
8570
5.17
759
4.17
632
32.6
3815
.001
11.0
0312
.005
37.0
0929
.002
10.0
0130
.010
69.0
1311
1.02
164
.016
118.
037
293.
074
12
14
3635
.734
Per
cent
wit
hin
race
60%
22%
18%
100%
41%
30%
32%
100%
42%
14%
43%
100%
38%
22%
40%
100%
25%
50%
25%
100%
Per
cent
of g
rand
tota
l53
.2%
19.4
%16
.3%
88.9
%0.
4%0.
3%0.
3%1.
0%0.
8%0.
3%0.
8%1.
9%3.
1%1.
8%3.
2%8.
1%0.
0%0.
1%0.
0%0.
1%10
0%Fe
mal
es in
col
umn
14.7
%25
.1%
29.6
%19
.7%
6.7%
27.3
%41
.7%
24.3
%6.
9%10
.0%
33.3
%18
.8%
18.9
%25
.0%
31.4
%25
.3%
0%0%
0%0%
20.2
%
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
002;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
htm
l*A
ccor
ding
to b
iolo
gy re
sear
ch e
xpen
ditu
res
FY19
99, N
SF; n
umbe
rs a
fter d
ecim
als
desi
gnat
e fe
mal
es. *
*Dec
lined
; dat
a ar
e fr
om o
ther
sou
rces
. ***
All
data
wer
e su
pplie
d by
one
adm
inis
trato
r.
Tab
le 1
3. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at "
Top
50"
Dep
artm
ents
of B
iolo
gica
l Sci
ence
s* b
y R
ace/
Eth
nici
ty, b
y G
ende
r, a
nd b
y R
ank
(FY
200
2)N
ativ
e A
m.
Whi
teB
lack
His
pani
cA
sian
Tab
le 1
4. T
enur
ed/T
enur
e-T
rack
Fac
ulty
at P
hD-G
rant
ing
Ast
rono
my/
Ast
roph
ysic
s D
epar
tmen
ts b
y R
ace/
Eth
nici
ty, b
y G
ende
r, a
nd b
y R
ank
(FY
200
4)*
Tot
alU
nive
rsity
Full
Ass
ocA
sst
Tot
Full
Ass
ocA
sst
Tot
Full
Ass
ocA
sst
Tot
Full
Ass
ocA
sst
Tot
Full
Ass
ocA
sstTot
Cal
Inst
of T
ech
17.0
22.
012.
0121.04
--
-0
--
-0
11
13
--
-0
24.0
4Pr
ince
ton
U12
.02
1-
13.02
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
13.0
2U
Cal
- B
erke
ley
11.0
1-
112.01
1-
-1
--
-0
-1.
011
2.01
--
-0
15.0
2H
arva
rd U
13.0
11
216.01
--
-0
--
-0
1-
-1
--
-0
17.0
1U
Chi
cago
251
228
--
-0
1.01
1.01
-2.02
11
13
--
-0
33.0
2U
Cal
- Sa
nta
Cru
z18
.03
-2
20.03
--
-0
--
-0
3-
-3
--
-0
23.0
3U
of A
rizon
a18
.03
35.
0126.04
--
-0
1-
-1
--
22
--
-0
29.0
4C
orne
ll U
22.0
11
-23.01
--
-0
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
24.0
1U
of T
exas
-Aus
tin18
.01
-1
19.01
--
-0
--
-0
2-
-2
--
-0
21.0
1U
Haw
aii -
Man
oa26
.02
3.01
332.03
--
-0
1-
12
2.01
11
4.01
-1
-1
39.0
4U
of C
ol -
Bou
lder
12.0
12.
014
18.02
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
18.0
2U
Ill,
Urb
-Chm
pgn
51
713
--
-0
--
-0
1.01
--
1.01
--
-0
14.0
1U
Wis
c - M
adis
on12
.02
12.
0115.03
--
11
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
16.0
3Y
ale
U7
-1
8-
--
0-
--
0-
-2.
022.02
--
-0
10.0
2U
CLA
12.0
21
114.02
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
14.0
2C
olum
bia
U9.
023
3.01
15.03
--
-0
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
16.0
3U
Mar
ylan
d7
5.01
315.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
15.0
1U
Mas
s - A
mhe
rst
6.01
12
9.01
--
-0
--
-0
12
14
--
-0
13.0
1Pe
nn S
tate
U9.
011
313.01
1.01
--
1.01
1-
-0
--
11
--
-0
15.0
2O
hio
Stat
e U
14.0
14.
01-
18.02
--
-0
--
-0
11.
01-
2.01
--
-0
20.0
3U
Min
neso
ta10
.01
--
10.01
-1
-1
--
-0
--
1.01
1.01
--
-0
12.0
2U
Mic
higa
n4
23.
019.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
10.0
1SU
NY
Sto
ny B
rook
61
-7
--
11
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
8B
osto
n U
112.
012.
0115.02
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
15.0
2In
dian
a U
6.02
11.
018.03
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
8.03
Iow
a St
ate
U4.
011
27.01
--
-0
--
10
--
-0
--
-0
7.01
U F
lorid
a10
.01
61.
0117.02
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
17.0
2N
M S
tate
U3
23.
018.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
8.01
Geo
rgia
St U
35
-8
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
8B
righa
m Y
oung
U3
21
6-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
06
Cas
e W
Res
erve
U1
2.01
-3.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
3.01
Cle
mso
n U
104
4.01
18.01
1-
-1
--
-0
11
13
--
-0
22.0
1D
artm
outh
Col
6.01
13.
0110.02
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
10.0
2U
Del
awar
e2
-1
3-
1.01
-1.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
4.01
U D
enve
r4
22
8-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
08
FL In
st T
ech
11
-2
--
-0
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
3Jo
hns H
opki
ns U
12.0
11
-13.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
13.0
1M
ichi
gan
Stat
e U
43.
01-
7.01
--
-0
--
-0
-1
-1
--
-0
8.01
NM
Inst
of M
& T
3.01
12.
026.03
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
6.03
Nor
thw
este
rn U
32
1.01
6.01
--
-0
--
-0
1-
-1
--
-0
7.01
U o
f Okl
ahom
a5
-1.
016.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
1.01
1.01
--
-0
7.02
U o
f Pen
n1
31.
015.01
--
-0
--
10
--
11
--
-0
6.01
U o
f Pitt
sbur
gh2
2.01
26.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
6.01
Ric
e U
nive
rsity
5.01
24
11.01
--
-0
--
-0
11
-2
--
-0
13.0
1U
of R
oche
ster
8.01
12.
0111.02
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
11.0
2R
utge
rs S
t U o
f NJ
44
3.01
11.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
11.0
1Te
xas C
hris
tian
U-
1.01
-1.01
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
1.01
U o
f Tol
edo
5.01
1.01
17.02
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
7.02
Tufts
U1
--
1-
--
0-
--
0-
--
0-
--
01
Van
derb
ilt U
-1
12
--
-0
--
11
--
-0
--
-0
3U
Was
hing
ton
8.02
1.01
211.03
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
--
-0
11.0
3 T
otal
418.
3986
.12
87.1
8591.69
3.01
2.01
2.00
7.02
4.01
1.01
4.00
9.02
16.0
212
.02
16.0
444.08
01
01
652.
81Pe
rcen
t with
in r
ace
70.7
%14
.6%
14.7
%100%
42.9
%28
.6%
28.5
%100%
44.5
%11
.2%
44.3
%100%
36.3
%27
.3%
36.4
%100%
0%0%
0%0%
Perc
ent o
f gra
nd to
tal
64.1
%13
.2%
13.4
%90.6%
0.46
%0.
31%
0.31
%1.08%
0.61
%0.
15%
0.61
%1.38%
2.5%
1.8%
2.5%
6.8%
0%0%
0%0%
100%
% F
emal
es in
col
umn
9.3%
14.0
%20
.7%
11.7
%33
.3%
50.0
%0.
0%28
.6%
25.0
%10
0%0.
0%22
.2%
12.5
%16
.7%
25.0
%18
.2%
0%0%
0%0%
12.2
%*R
anke
d by
the
Nat
iona
l Res
earc
h C
ounc
il in
199
4; n
umbe
rs a
fter d
ecim
als d
esig
nate
fem
ales
. D
epar
tmen
ts g
rant
ing
the
PhD
in a
stro
nom
y or
ast
roph
ysic
s, w
hich
are
not
show
n, d
id n
ot re
spo
Ref
eren
ce:
"The
Nel
son
Div
ersi
ty S
urve
ys"
Nel
son,
D. J
.: N
orm
an, O
K, 2
003;
ht
tp://
chem
info
.che
m.o
u.ed
u/fa
culty
/djn
/div
ersi
ty/to
p50.
ht
Nat
ive
Am
.W
hite
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Asi
an
APPENDIX 2
Tables of data on US citizen and permanent residentPhD attainment in fourteen science and engineering dis-ciplines each year from 1983 through 2002. Data aredisaggregated by race/ethnicity and by gender.
Data are provided for PhD attainment in the followingdisciplines:
Table 1 Chemistry
Table 2 Physics
Table 3 Mathematics
Table 4 Computer Science
Table 5 Chemical Engineering
Table 6 Civil Engineering
Table 7 Electrical Engineering
Table 8 Mechanical Engineering
Table 9 Economics
Table 10 Political Science
Table 11 Sociology
Table 12 Psychology
Table 13 Biological Sciences
Table 14 Astronomy
Che
mis
tryT
able
1.
PhD
s in
Che
mis
try83
8485
8687
8889
9091
9293
9495
9697
9899
0001
0283
-02
%93
-02
%U
S ci
t & p
erm
res
1424
1415
1432
1413
1472
1451
1383
1497
1461
1441
1400
1616
1624
1462
1439
1466
1400
1241
1230
1227
2849
410
0%14
105
100%
mal
e11
7511
4911
5411
0411
4511
2310
1811
1410
9310
4099
911
5210
8710
2410
0810
0498
081
982
280
720
817
73.1
%97
0268
.8%
f
emal
e24
926
627
830
932
732
836
538
336
840
140
146
453
743
943
146
342
642
240
842
076
8527
.0%
4411
31.3
%W
hite
1264
1211
1243
1208
1267
1257
1188
1284
1239
1219
1145
1179
1112
1063
1078
1127
1088
988
974
985
2311
982
.9%
1073
977
.6%
mal
e10
5798
810
1395
299
698
187
296
992
690
184
687
276
075
477
378
579
766
567
766
317
247
61.8
%75
9254
.8%
f
emal
e20
722
323
025
627
127
631
631
531
331
829
930
735
130
830
534
429
332
329
732
258
7421
.1%
3149
22.7
%A
sian
s83
9711
210
910
885
9699
122
135
157
332
416
295
235
207
187
121
126
127
3249
11.6
%22
0315
.9%
mal
e60
7079
7477
5773
7086
7984
203
269
187
142
134
103
6765
7620
557.
4%13
309.
6%
fem
ale
2327
3335
3128
2329
3656
7112
814
610
892
7280
5461
5111
844.
2%86
36.
2%N
ativ
e A
m.
33
25
65
53
96
24
54
67
57
115
103
0.4%
560.
4%
m
ale
33
23
45
53
74
14
33
66
36
95
850.
3%46
0.3%
f
emal
e0
00
22
00
02
21
03
10
12
12
019
0.1%
110.
1%B
lack
1623
2317
1321
2624
2317
3134
3345
3545
5644
4244
612
2.2%
409
3.0%
mal
e14
2117
1411
1419
1718
1222
2516
3526
1733
2523
2240
11.
4%24
41.
8%
f
emal
e2
26
32
77
75
59
917
109
2823
1919
2221
10.
8%16
51.
2%H
ispa
nic
2133
1725
4448
4357
4642
5159
4335
4434
4251
4338
816
2.9%
440
3.2%
mal
e7
2412
1929
3526
3337
2633
4329
2932
2525
3026
2054
01.
9%29
22.
1%
fem
ale
149
56
1513
1724
916
1816
147
129
2121
1718
281
1.0%
153
1.1%
Dat
a so
urce
: Su
rvey
of E
arne
d D
octo
rate
s (N
SF/N
IH/U
SED
/NE
H/U
SDA
/NA
SA).
Phys
ics
Tab
le 2
. Ph
Ds
in P
hysi
cs83
8485
8687
8889
9091
9293
9495
9697
9899
0001
0283
-02
%93
-02
%U
S ci
t & p
erm
res
760
775
662
643
682
681
654
725
739
790
806
1044
1059
949
883
823
742
692
677
586
1537
210
0%82
6110
0%
m
ale
703
716
603
588
620
621
596
663
663
696
712
907
916
815
759
716
647
609
590
495
1363
588
.7%
7166
86.7
%
fem
ale
5759
5955
6260
5862
7694
9413
714
313
412
410
795
8387
9117
3711
.3%
1095
13.3
%W
hite
655
677
580
571
606
577
555
618
634
641
656
735
687
684
659
651
630
571
557
460
1240
483
.3%
6290
78.2
%
m
ale
604
628
534
524
553
535
509
570
573
575
590
655
613
594
579
577
555
506
489
388
1115
174
.9%
5546
68.9
%
fem
ale
5149
4647
5342
4648
6166
6680
7490
8074
7565
6872
1253
8.4%
744
9.2%
Asi
ans
5347
3631
3447
5758
5088
101
254
311
195
157
111
6668
7061
1895
12.7
%13
9417
.3%
mal
e48
4028
2729
3446
4738
6678
207
251
162
119
8553
5657
4915
2010
.2%
1117
13.9
%
fem
ale
57
84
513
1111
1222
2347
6033
3826
1312
1312
375
2.5%
277
3.4%
Nat
ive
Am
.3
11
01
13
01
62
22
22
13
10
234
0.2%
170.
2%
m
ale
31
10
10
30
16
11
22
21
31
02
310.
2%15
0.2%
f
emal
e0
00
00
10
00
01
10
00
00
00
03
0.0%
20.
0%B
lack
911
48
512
55
96
711
814
1410
816
1219
193
1.3%
119
1.5%
mal
e9
113
74
115
59
67
77
1113
74
1511
1616
81.
1%98
1.2%
f
emal
e0
01
11
10
00
00
41
31
34
11
325
0.2%
210.
3%H
ispan
ic5
1413
1312
1314
1318
2626
2926
2922
1816
2315
2236
72.
5%22
62.
8%
m
ale
513
1111
1010
1311
1623
2424
2125
2016
1520
1119
318
2.1%
195
2.4%
f
emal
e0
12
22
31
22
32
55
42
21
34
349
0.3%
310.
4%D
ata
sour
ce: S
urve
y of
Ear
ned
Doc
tora
tes
(NSF
/NIH
/USE
D/N
EH
/USD
A/N
ASA
).
Mat
hem
atic
sT
able
3.
PhD
s in
Mat
h83
8485
8687
8889
9091
9293
9495
9697
9899
0001
0283
-02
%93
-02
%U
S ci
t & p
erm
res4
5744
341
840
239
638
642
842
251
850
759
065
777
164
862
966
960
557
452
444
210
486
100%
6109
100%
mal
e37
135
733
632
931
931
632
732
940
639
042
650
658
850
345
247
141
341
037
030
879
2775
.6%
4447
72.8
%
fem
ale
8686
8273
7770
101
9311
211
716
415
118
314
517
719
819
216
415
413
425
5924
.4%
1662
27.2
%W
hite
395
380
350
343
319
332
369
372
419
425
476
479
535
478
479
526
506
464
428
369
8444
82.8
%47
4079
.4%
mal
e31
930
828
028
225
827
328
129
333
533
235
236
140
937
334
437
634
733
830
825
864
2763
.0%
3466
58.1
%
fem
ale
7672
7061
6159
8879
8493
124
118
126
105
135
150
159
126
120
111
2017
19.8
%12
7421
.3%
Asi
ans
3430
3328
4133
2427
5752
7914
220
714
097
7156
7048
2912
9812
.7%
939
15.7
%
m
ale
2820
2723
3022
2120
3933
4311
615
810
469
4436
4932
2393
79.
2%67
411
.3%
f
emal
e6
106
511
113
718
1936
2649
3628
2720
2116
636
13.
5%26
54.
4%N
ativ
e A
m.
03
01
02
01
02
12
21
13
12
23
270.
3%18
0.3%
mal
e0
30
00
20
10
11
21
11
11
11
219
0.2%
120.
2%
fem
ale
00
01
00
00
01
00
10
02
01
11
80.
1%6
0.1%
Bla
ck3
47
611
48
411
48
115
87
1612
1419
1417
61.
7%11
41.
9%
m
ale
23
73
94
53
74
78
46
59
67
126
117
1.1%
701.
2%
f
emal
e1
10
32
03
14
01
31
22
76
77
859
0.6%
440.
7%H
ispa
nic
711
1212
114
1110
912
1613
1510
2027
1515
1512
257
2.5%
158
2.6%
mal
e5
107
99
47
65
914
1011
1014
2010
810
818
61.
8%11
51.
9%
fem
ale
21
53
20
44
43
23
40
67
57
54
710.
7%43
0.7%
Dat
a so
urce
: Su
rvey
of E
arne
d D
octo
rate
s (N
SF/N
IH/U
SED
/NE
H/U
SDA
/NA
SA).
Com
pute
r Sci
ence
Tab
le 4
. Ph
Ds
in C
ompu
ter S
cien
ce83
8485
8687
8889
9091
9293
9495
9697
9899
0001
0283
-02
%93
-02
%U
S ci
t & p
erm
res
207
195
213
249
275
326
396
403
451
489
509
543
616
514
520
561
492
458
423
411
8251
100%
5047
100%
mal
e17
716
818
920
622
128
031
231
335
740
640
044
947
342
342
043
838
737
232
532
466
4080
.5%
4011
79.5
%
fem
ale
3027
2443
5446
8490
9483
109
9414
391
100
123
105
8698
8716
1119
.5%
1036
20.5
%W
hite
174
163
177
193
229
265
319
339
355
378
409
401
450
356
361
412
356
336
322
291
6286
78.6
%36
9475
.4%
mal
e15
013
915
615
318
422
525
225
928
230
932
632
634
729
529
532
828
527
426
223
250
7963
.5%
2970
60.6
%
fem
ale
2424
2140
4540
6780
7369
8375
103
6166
8471
6260
5912
0715
.1%
724
14.8
%A
sian
s20
2017
3726
4452
4866
8677
116
137
111
107
9087
7661
8613
6417
.1%
948
19.3
%
m
ale
1618
1734
2038
4241
5174
5810
010
795
8167
6861
4160
1089
13.6
%73
815
.1%
f
emal
e4
20
36
610
715
1219
1630
1626
2319
1520
2627
53.
4%21
04.
3%N
ativ
e A
m.
10
00
31
20
12
11
04
14
11
12
260.
3%16
0.3%
mal
e1
00
02
11
01
20
00
20
40
11
218
0.2%
100.
2%
fem
ale
00
00
10
10
00
11
02
10
10
00
80.
1%6
0.1%
Bla
ck3
33
12
21
18
56
1011
124
1418
1815
1715
41.
9%12
52.
6%
m
ale
12
31
12
01
44
28
79
36
913
510
911.
1%72
1.5%
f
emal
e2
10
01
01
04
14
24
31
89
510
763
0.8%
531.
1%H
ispa
nic
03
67
42
45
128
77
616
1615
1414
814
168
2.1%
117
2.4%
mal
e0
34
74
21
411
76
72
914
1411
114
1213
31.
7%90
1.8%
f
emal
e0
02
00
03
11
11
04
72
13
34
235
0.4%
270.
6%D
ata
sour
ce:
Surv
ey o
f Ear
ned
Doc
tora
tes
(NSF
/NIH
/USE
D/N
EH
/USD
A/N
ASA
).
Che
mic
al E
ngin
eerin
gT
able
5.
PhD
s in
Che
mic
al E
ngin
eeri
ng83
8485
8687
8889
9091
9293
9495
9697
9899
0001
0283
-02
%93
-02
%U
S ci
t & p
erm
res
200
199
292
298
350
408
444
392
399
378
377
380
381
391
409
374
371
382
358
336
7119
100%
3759
100%
mal
e18
518
126
125
629
835
537
533
033
929
631
330
229
329
333
229
829
628
226
524
857
9881
.4%
2922
77.7
%
fem
ale
1518
3142
5253
6962
6082
6478
8898
7776
7510
093
8813
2118
.6%
837
22.3
%W
hite
152
150
211
227
266
317
345
318
322
284
295
259
256
274
293
275
286
280
269
233
5312
76.3
%27
2073
.9%
mal
e14
013
819
019
622
327
229
327
027
722
524
421
119
620
524
122
323
621
321
017
143
7462
.9%
2150
58.4
%
fem
ale
1212
2131
4345
5248
4559
5148
6069
5252
5067
5962
938
13.5
%57
015
.5%
Asi
ans
3234
6058
6067
7751
5054
6296
101
8073
6558
6953
7112
7118
.3%
728
19.8
%
m
ale
3229
5452
5461
6640
4138
5571
7662
6146
4448
3449
1013
14.6
%54
614
.8%
f
emal
e0
56
66
611
119
167
2525
1812
1914
2119
2225
83.
7%18
24.
9%N
ativ
e A
m.
02
00
12
10
11
11
21
43
21
12
260.
4%18
0.5%
mal
e0
20
01
21
00
11
12
13
01
01
219
0.3%
120.
3%
fem
ale
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
13
11
00
70.
1%6
0.2%
Bla
ck3
26
44
75
108
136
83
1216
311
817
1215
82.
3%96
2.6%
mal
e3
24
34
64
87
123
42
710
27
37
610
41.
5%51
1.4%
f
emal
e0
02
10
11
21
13
41
56
14
510
654
0.8%
451.
2%H
ispa
nic
63
24
115
98
1116
107
1319
713
718
716
192
2.8%
117
3.2%
mal
e5
22
28
55
77
127
711
134
133
142
913
82.
0%83
2.3%
f
emal
e1
10
23
04
14
43
02
63
04
45
754
0.8%
340.
9%D
ata
sour
ce:
Surv
ey o
f Ear
ned
Doc
tora
tes
(NSF
/NIH
/USE
D/N
EH
/USD
A/N
ASA
).
Civ
il En
gine
erin
gTa
ble
6. P
hDs
in C
ivil
Engi
neer
ing
8586
8788
8990
9192
9394
9596
9798
9900
0102
85-0
2%
93-0
2%
US
cit &
per
m re
s17
019
220
323
324
724
121
321
522
729
230
930
532
729
731
226
126
924
545
5810
0%28
4410
0%
m
ale
159
177
192
218
207
207
188
192
195
237
257
258
269
239
251
213
203
189
3851
84.5
%23
1181
.3%
f
emal
e11
1511
1540
3425
2332
5552
4758
5861
4866
5670
715
.5%
533
18.7
%W
hite
130
152
158
183
191
196
159
166
168
199
194
199
220
217
241
194
194
183
3344
75.3
%20
0972
.6%
mal
e12
013
914
917
115
716
714
314
714
315
316
016
818
017
219
416
014
314
328
0963
.3%
1616
58.4
%
fem
ale
1013
912
3429
1619
2546
3431
4045
4734
5140
535
12.0
%39
314
.2%
Asi
ans
2626
3427
3628
3034
4169
9189
7238
4643
3729
796
17.9
%55
520
.1%
mal
e25
2632
2633
2526
3239
6577
7558
3241
3328
2269
515
.6%
470
17.0
%
fem
ale
10
21
33
42
24
1414
146
510
97
101
2.3%
853.
1%N
ativ
e A
m.
00
11
12
11
00
02
20
21
00
140.
3%7
0.3%
mal
e0
01
10
21
00
00
11
01
00
08
0.2%
30.
1%
fem
ale
00
00
10
01
00
01
10
11
00
60.
1%4
0.1%
Bla
ck4
44
15
112
35
811
810
96
611
1312
12.
7%87
3.1%
mal
e4
34
15
110
33
68
710
74
511
910
12.
3%70
2.5%
f
emal
e0
10
00
02
02
23
10
22
10
420
0.5%
170.
6%H
ispa
nic
77
113
89
57
1214
116
1216
129
98
166
3.7%
109
3.9%
mal
e7
71
128
73
610
1110
611
136
87
814
13.
2%90
3.3%
f
emal
e0
00
10
22
12
31
01
36
12
025
0.6%
190.
7%D
ata
sour
ce:
Surv
ey o
f Ear
ned
Doc
tora
tes
(NSF
/NIH
/USE
D/N
EH
/USD
A/N
ASA
).
Elec
trica
l Eng
inee
ring
Tab
le 7
. Ph
Ds
in E
lect
rical
Eng
inee
ring
8384
8586
8788
8990
9192
9394
9596
9798
9900
0102
83-0
2%
93-0
2%
US
cit &
per
m re
s28
731
435
341
039
350
353
959
968
671
979
589
997
192
994
080
476
664
855
950
612
620
100%
7817
100%
mal
e28
030
533
138
537
847
050
355
263
865
271
581
185
182
383
471
368
555
549
344
011
414
90.4
%69
2088
.5%
f
emal
e7
922
2515
3336
4748
6780
8812
010
610
691
8193
6666
1206
9.6%
897
11.5
%W
hite
214
231
259
319
283
363
405
450
478
487
553
548
590
589
579
523
510
443
368
306
8498
69.3
%50
0965
.7%
mal
e20
922
724
329
927
134
137
841
144
444
750
449
452
352
352
547
046
638
833
427
677
7363
.4%
4503
59.1
%
fem
ale
54
1620
1222
2739
3440
4954
6766
5453
4455
3430
725
5.9%
506
6.6%
Asi
ans
5859
6371
7810
393
115
140
175
198
303
322
276
256
205
172
141
133
132
3093
25.2
%21
3828
.0%
mal
e57
5459
6775
9785
109
135
154
173
272
276
246
217
174
146
108
105
106
2715
22.1
%18
2323
.9%
f
emal
e1
54
43
68
65
2125
3146
3039
3126
3328
2637
83.
1%31
54.
1%N
ativ
e A
m.
00
12
30
00
24
01
12
53
10
10
260.
2%14
0.2%
mal
e0
01
23
00
01
30
11
15
31
01
023
0.2%
130.
2%
fem
ale
00
00
00
00
11
00
01
00
00
00
30.
0%1
0.0%
Bla
ck2
38
43
79
816
1715
1724
2231
2330
2122
1629
82.
4%22
12.
9%
m
ale
23
84
35
97
1415
1314
2017
2719
2519
2112
257
2.1%
187
2.5%
f
emal
e0
00
00
20
12
22
34
54
45
21
441
0.3%
340.
4%H
ispa
nic
48
49
614
1413
1617
1721
1527
2631
3022
2230
346
2.8%
241
3.2%
mal
e4
84
86
1213
1216
1414
2114
2320
2926
2119
2631
02.
5%21
32.
8%
fem
ale
00
01
02
11
03
30
14
62
41
34
360.
3%28
0.4%
Dat
a so
urce
: Su
rvey
of E
arne
d D
octo
rate
s (N
SF/N
IH/U
SED
/NE
H/U
SDA
/NA
SA).
Mec
hani
cal E
ngin
eerin
gT
able
8.
PhD
s in
Mec
hani
cal E
ngin
eeri
ng83
8485
8687
8889
9091
9293
9495
9697
9899
0001
0283
-02
%93
-02
%U
S ci
t & p
erm
res
192
202
251
267
308
327
325
368
359
426
434
538
563
588
538
516
463
397
427
343
7832
100%
4807
100%
mal
e18
619
023
325
429
731
030
634
432
240
139
848
451
452
848
346
640
334
138
929
971
4891
.3%
4305
89.6
%
fem
ale
612
1813
1117
1924
3725
3654
4960
5550
6056
3844
684
8.7%
502
10.4
%W
hite
146
154
176
210
230
253
241
286
266
326
328
337
339
392
377
371
335
279
301
227
5574
73.1
%32
8670
.1%
mal
e14
214
315
919
821
923
722
426
723
630
729
631
131
435
334
433
429
024
627
420
751
0166
.9%
2969
63.4
%
fem
ale
411
1712
1116
1719
3019
3226
2539
3337
4533
2720
473
6.2%
317
6.8%
Asi
ans
3437
5831
6157
6669
6278
9317
918
816
611
389
8872
7671
1688
22.1
%11
3524
.2%
mal
e33
3657
3161
5765
6659
7490
155
165
149
9779
7756
6856
1531
20.1
%99
221
.2%
f
emal
e1
11
00
01
33
43
2423
1716
1011
168
1515
72.
1%14
33.
1%N
ativ
e A
m.
00
02
11
00
11
00
23
62
23
11
260.
3%20
0.4%
mal
e0
00
21
10
01
10
02
35
22
21
124
0.3%
180.
4%
fem
ale
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
01
00
20.
0%2
0.0%
Bla
ck5
23
33
15
53
53
713
1012
1412
1817
1715
82.
1%12
32.
6%
m
ale
42
32
31
55
25
36
127
1114
1113
1613
138
1.8%
106
2.3%
f
emal
e1
00
10
00
01
00
11
31
01
51
420
0.3%
170.
4%H
ispa
nic
25
36
57
35
911
58
813
1419
912
2112
177
2.3%
121
2.6%
mal
e2
53
65
62
47
95
78
1311
188
1121
715
82.
1%10
92.
3%
fem
ale
00
00
01
11
22
01
00
31
11
05
190.
2%12
0.3%
Dat
a so
urce
: Su
rvey
of E
arne
d D
octo
rate
s (N
SF/N
IH/U
SED
/NE
H/U
SDA
/NA
SA).
Econ
omic
sT
able
9.
PhD
s in
Eco
nom
ics
8384
8586
8788
8990
9192
9394
9596
9798
9900
0102
83-0
2%
93-0
2%
US
cit &
per
m re
s65
259
458
661
757
357
357
554
152
852
251
156
662
660
859
057
854
350
345
942
411
169
100%
5408
100%
mal
e53
148
047
948
445
643
343
540
239
237
736
540
144
244
942
840
637
535
930
529
582
9474
.3%
3825
70.7
%
fem
ale
121
114
107
133
117
140
140
139
136
145
146
165
184
159
162
172
168
144
154
129
2875
25.7
%15
8329
.3%
Whi
te56
750
149
453
747
647
848
845
542
142
841
743
045
945
043
142
841
739
735
832
789
5982
.2%
4114
77.7
%
m
ale
466
407
401
416
377
360
365
339
314
304
300
296
317
331
314
301
290
283
244
233
6658
61.1
%29
0954
.9%
f
emal
e10
194
9312
199
118
123
116
107
124
117
134
142
119
117
127
127
114
114
9423
0121
.1%
1205
22.8
%A
sian
s40
3729
3350
5138
3641
4651
9312
010
389
8565
4856
5611
6710
.7%
766
14.5
%
m
ale
2632
2023
4141
3226
2431
2972
8875
5654
4032
3031
803
7.4%
507
9.6%
f
emal
e14
59
109
106
1017
1522
2132
2833
3125
1626
2536
43.
3%25
94.
9%N
ativ
e A
m.
01
22
01
11
11
01
21
10
11
20
190.
17%
90.
17%
mal
e0
11
20
01
11
00
11
11
00
11
013
0.1%
60.
1%
fem
ale
00
10
01
00
01
00
10
00
10
10
60.
1%3
0.1%
Bla
ck16
2321
1617
1917
2529
2523
2325
2222
2328
2212
1342
13.
86%
213
4.02
%
m
ale
1213
2115
1315
1417
2724
1917
2118
1917
2017
1010
339
3.1%
168
3.2%
f
emal
e4
100
14
43
82
14
64
43
68
52
382
0.8%
450.
9%H
ispa
nic
1216
178
1512
1615
1614
1515
1420
2526
2122
1816
333
3.06
%19
23.
63%
mal
e11
1414
812
69
1211
1012
1110
1420
2116
1713
1025
12.
3%14
42.
7%
fem
ale
12
30
36
73
54
34
46
55
55
56
820.
8%48
0.9%
Dat
a so
urce
: Su
rvey
of E
arne
d D
octo
rate
s (N
SF/N
IH/U
SED
/NE
H/U
SDA
/NA
SA).
Polit
ical
Sci
ence
Tab
le 1
0. P
hDs
in P
oliti
cal S
cien
ce83
8485
8687
8889
9091
9293
9495
9697
9899
0001
0283
-02
%93
-02
%U
S ci
t & p
erm
res
532
542
501
487
461
426
488
536
552
599
618
715
689
743
788
791
805
803
747
729
1255
210
0%74
2810
0%
m
ale
391
396
356
321
312
296
311
388
366
399
413
469
469
481
527
470
502
503
471
402
8243
65.7
%47
0763
.4%
f
emal
e14
114
614
516
614
913
017
714
818
620
020
524
622
026
226
132
130
330
027
632
743
0934
.3%
2721
36.6
%W
hite
439
436
406
402
385
360
410
429
450
490
513
570
560
592
655
633
640
637
586
575
1016
883
.5%
5961
82.5
%
m
ale
319
318
292
267
255
246
259
300
295
318
336
365
379
391
438
377
396
414
374
319
6658
54.6
%37
8952
.4%
f
emal
e12
011
811
413
513
011
415
112
915
517
217
720
518
120
121
725
624
422
321
225
635
1028
.8%
2172
30.1
%A
sian
s11
2212
2112
1320
2525
3630
4851
4645
4246
3836
3361
25.
0%41
55.
7%
m
ale
916
915
1010
1022
1825
2434
3530
2926
2824
1517
406
3.3%
262
3.6%
f
emal
e2
63
62
310
37
116
1416
1616
1618
1421
1620
61.
7%15
32.
1%N
ativ
e A
m.
11
10
21
21
33
04
24
43
74
53
510.
42%
360.
50%
mal
e1
11
02
01
13
20
32
20
26
23
133
0.3%
210.
3%
fem
ale
00
00
01
10
01
01
02
41
12
22
180.
1%15
0.2%
Bla
ck34
3545
3431
2940
4838
4245
5249
5937
5559
6171
6192
57.
59%
549
7.60
%
m
ale
2327
3018
2124
2936
2831
2835
3032
2526
4028
4331
585
4.8%
318
4.4%
f
emal
e11
815
1610
511
1210
1117
1719
2712
2919
3328
3034
02.
8%23
13.
2%H
ispa
nic
1915
1416
2010
920
2219
2024
2129
1935
3128
2136
428
3.51
%26
43.
65%
mal
e14
117
1116
75
1713
1616
1718
1514
2215
1714
1928
42.
3%16
72.
3%
fem
ale
54
75
43
43
93
47
314
513
1611
717
144
1.2%
971.
3%D
ata
sour
ce:
Surv
ey o
f Ear
ned
Doc
tora
tes
(NSF
/NIH
/USE
D/N
EH
/USD
A/N
ASA
).
Soci
olog
yT
able
11.
PhD
s in
Soc
iolo
gy83
8485
8687
8889
9091
9293
9495
9697
9899
0001
0283
-02
%93
-02
%U
S ci
t & p
erm
res
450
442
392
405
346
351
326
329
365
378
395
420
429
424
461
442
459
514
469
475
8272
100%
4488
100%
mal
e24
623
417
820
919
316
013
515
217
017
518
618
218
218
818
818
216
420
518
218
536
9644
.7%
1844
41.1
%
fem
ale
204
208
214
196
153
191
191
177
195
203
209
238
247
236
273
260
295
309
287
290
4576
55.3
%26
4458
.9%
Whi
te39
138
233
233
829
528
925
725
828
530
631
633
232
832
834
634
534
638
234
934
865
5381
.0%
3420
78.1
%
m
ale
213
192
147
174
160
126
104
117
130
134
152
138
132
140
138
135
130
143
128
144
2877
35.5
%13
8031
.5%
f
emal
e17
819
018
516
413
516
315
314
115
517
216
419
419
618
820
821
021
623
922
120
436
7645
.4%
2040
46.6
%A
sian
s10
118
1119
1413
1519
2421
3850
4429
2330
3230
3047
15.
8%32
77.
5%
m
ale
38
56
136
86
913
719
2217
1210
616
1210
208
2.6%
131
3.0%
f
emal
e7
33
56
85
910
1114
1928
2717
1324
1618
2026
33.
2%19
64.
5%N
ativ
e A
m.
01
14
22
11
26
04
17
43
46
27
580.
72%
380.
87%
mal
e0
10
40
20
02
30
01
51
01
31
024
0.3%
120.
3%
fem
ale
00
10
20
11
03
04
02
33
33
17
340.
4%26
0.6%
Bla
ck26
2826
2612
2228
2327
2629
2629
2542
4045
5744
4662
77.
75%
383
8.75
%
m
ale
1516
1313
814
1312
814
1115
1313
1821
1826
1819
298
3.7%
172
3.9%
f
emal
e11
1213
134
815
1119
1218
1116
1224
1927
3126
2732
94.
1%21
14.
8%H
ispa
nic
1117
1814
1017
2327
2313
2112
1613
1915
2626
3825
384
4.74
%21
14.
82%
mal
e8
159
56
810
1314
812
510
710
78
1519
819
72.
4%10
12.
3%
fem
ale
32
99
49
1314
95
97
66
98
1811
1917
187
2.3%
110
2.5%
Dat
a so
urce
: Su
rvey
of E
arne
d D
octo
rate
s (N
SF/N
IH/U
SED
/NE
H/U
SDA
/NA
SA).
Psyc
holo
gyT
able
12.
PhD
s in
Psy
chol
ogy
8384
8586
8788
8990
9192
9394
9596
9798
9900
0102
83-0
2%
93-0
2%
US
cit/p
erm
res
3108
2986
2864
2832
2806
2729
2737
2992
3018
2986
3161
3136
3184
3233
3129
3274
3293
3231
3032
2790
6052
110
0%31
463
100%
mal
e16
0514
6614
2513
6212
7712
1711
7412
2011
2812
0612
2311
6911
2710
4810
2210
6310
6410
5498
291
423
746
39.2
%10
666
33.9
%
fem
ale
1503
1520
1439
1470
1529
1512
1563
1772
1890
1780
1938
1967
2057
2185
2107
2211
2229
2177
2050
1876
3677
560
.8%
2079
766
.1%
Whi
te27
8526
8325
9025
4725
1624
4524
5226
4826
5226
3528
0327
2927
2227
4425
2326
4527
0226
0524
5322
2652
105
87.6
%26
152
84.8
%
m
ale
1456
1318
1302
1234
1170
1094
1065
1075
991
1078
1094
1028
980
909
833
882
913
881
825
746
2087
435
.1%
9091
29.5
%
fem
ale
1329
1365
1288
1313
1346
1351
1387
1573
1661
1557
1709
1701
1742
1835
1690
1763
1789
1724
1628
1480
3123
152
.5%
1706
155
.3%
Asi
ans
4443
4441
4747
5553
5959
7310
812
112
112
611
313
214
612
212
816
822.
8%11
903.
9%
m
ale
2321
2318
1620
2822
1520
2232
4331
3129
3447
2943
547
0.9%
341
1.1%
f
emal
e21
2221
2331
2727
3144
3951
7678
9095
8498
9993
8511
351.
9%84
92.
8%N
ativ
e A
m.
96
109
167
1119
1315
1512
1417
1831
3522
1715
311
0.5%
196
0.6%
mal
e7
55
44
33
65
66
56
86
1312
35
711
90.
2%71
0.2%
f
emal
e2
15
512
48
138
99
78
912
1823
1912
819
20.
3%12
50.
4%B
lack
112
121
105
109
9310
397
115
130
106
118
124
149
152
152
158
172
189
174
172
2651
4.5%
1560
5.1%
mal
e37
4542
4234
4636
4344
2844
4639
3841
4337
4550
4382
31.
4%42
61.
4%
f
emal
e75
7663
6759
5761
7286
7874
7811
011
411
111
513
514
412
412
918
283.
1%11
343.
7%H
ispa
nic
9484
6990
9593
9310
912
213
313
113
314
617
317
120
821
521
117
518
427
294.
6%17
475.
7%
m
ale
4342
2847
3238
3052
5255
4543
4953
6456
5760
4656
948
1.6%
529
1.7%
f
emal
e51
4241
4363
5563
5770
7886
9097
120
107
152
158
151
129
128
1781
3.0%
1218
3.9%
Dat
a so
urce
: Su
rvey
of E
arne
d D
octo
rate
s (N
SF/N
IH/U
SED
/NE
H/U
SDA
/NA
SA).
Bio
logy
Tab
le 1
3. P
hDs
in B
iolo
gica
l Sci
ence
s83
8485
8687
8889
9091
9293
9495
9697
9899
0001
0283
-02
%93
-02
%U
S ci
t & p
erm
res
3324
3399
3256
3241
3141
3323
3299
3380
3525
3568
3752
4088
4329
4364
4256
4308
4124
4268
4241
4102
7118
610
0%41
832
100%
mal
e22
0223
0821
7821
2519
9720
7120
2320
6821
3521
3021
6823
4524
7024
2323
3623
8722
6022
8122
7221
8742
179
59.3
%23
129
55.3
%
fem
ale
1122
1091
1078
1116
1144
1252
1276
1312
1390
1438
1584
1743
1859
1941
1920
1921
1864
1987
1969
1915
2900
740
.7%
1870
344
.7%
Whi
te29
9530
4429
1328
8827
5929
6629
0429
7530
4130
6831
4431
0531
1531
7031
5832
4631
2833
0832
5331
1458
180
83.3
%31
741
77.4
%
m
ale
2007
2085
1962
1911
1764
1852
1784
1821
1871
1847
1833
1758
1770
1771
1760
1810
1726
1798
1768
1723
3489
850
.0%
1771
743
.2%
f
emal
e98
895
995
197
799
511
1411
2011
5411
7012
2113
1113
4713
4513
9913
9814
3614
0215
1014
8513
9123
282
33.3
%14
024
34.2
%A
sian
s16
415
815
116
817
017
120
120
026
126
836
671
992
088
572
165
760
853
955
858
078
8511
.3%
6553
16.0
%
m
ale
8889
9410
193
9811
211
313
213
619
545
151
148
237
336
633
227
628
727
943
296.
2%35
528.
7%
fem
ale
7669
5767
7773
8987
129
132
171
268
409
403
348
291
276
263
271
301
3556
5.1%
3001
7.3%
Nat
ive
Am
.4
1013
1711
67
410
137
1615
207
1220
1715
1222
40.
3%14
10.
3%
m
ale
37
411
74
43
68
511
1011
46
1010
86
132
0.2%
810.
2%
fem
ale
13
96
42
31
45
25
59
36
107
76
920.
1%60
0.1%
Bla
ck46
5053
4860
4856
5164
6275
7810
798
112
111
116
118
139
122
1492
2.1%
1076
2.6%
mal
e24
2432
2635
2532
2932
3843
3364
5852
4150
4455
5573
71.
1%49
51.
2%
f
emal
e22
2621
2225
2324
2232
2432
4543
4060
7066
7484
6775
51.
1%58
11.
4%H
ispa
nic
4344
5966
6276
7189
9510
211
413
112
713
114
616
817
517
316
517
820
372.
9%15
083.
7%
m
ale
2229
3639
3849
5056
5659
5769
8065
8389
9982
8865
1146
1.6%
777
1.9%
f
emal
e21
1523
2724
2721
3339
4357
6247
6663
7976
9177
113
891
1.3%
731
1.8%
Dat
a so
urce
: Su
rvey
of E
arne
d D
octo
rate
s (N
SF/N
IH/U
SED
/NE
H/U
SDA
/NA
SA).
Ast
rono
my
Tab
le 1
4. P
hDs
in A
stro
nom
y85
8687
8889
9091
9293
9495
9697
9899
0001
0285
-02
%93
-02
%U
S ci
t & p
erm
res
8491
7310
482
9686
106
111
112
141
149
158
147
117
139
123
109
2028
100%
1306
100%
mal
e75
8464
9069
7879
9188
9111
611
413
212
091
104
9487
1667
82.2
%10
3779
.4%
f
emal
e9
79
1413
187
1523
2125
3526
2726
3529
2236
117
.8%
269
20.6
%W
hite
7779
6993
7486
8395
100
9711
113
113
212
010
911
510
387
1761
90.1
%11
0588
.0%
mal
e69
7660
8163
7077
8479
7892
101
110
9686
8976
6914
5674
.5%
876
69.8
%
fem
ale
83
912
1116
611
2119
1930
2224
2326
2718
305
15.6
%22
918
.2%
Asi
ans
26
15
25
04
310
2212
813
313
613
128
6.5%
103
8.2%
mal
e2
41
40
30
21
918
87
103
96
1299
5.1%
836.
6%
fem
ale
02
01
22
02
21
44
13
04
01
291.
5%20
1.6%
Nat
ive
Am
.0
00
02
00
01
00
01
11
11
08
0.4%
60.
5%
m
ale
00
00
20
00
10
00
11
00
10
60.
3%4
0.3%
f
emal
e0
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
02
0.1%
20.
2%B
lack
00
20
01
01
20
10
21
21
11
150.
8%11
0.9%
mal
e0
02
00
10
02
01
01
10
01
09
0.5%
60.
5%
f
emal
e0
00
00
00
10
00
01
02
10
16
0.3%
50.
4%H
ispa
nic
02
02
22
14
22
42
32
13
74
432.
2%30
2.4%
mal
e0
10
22
21
32
22
12
21
26
334
1.7%
231.
8%
fem
ale
01
00
00
01
00
21
10
01
11
90.
5%7
0.6%
Dat
a so
urce
: Sur
vey
of E
arne
d D
octo
rate
s (N
SF/N
IH/U
SED
/NE
H/U
SDA
/NA
SA).