Upload
keaira
View
33
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A Multi-Institutional Study of Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning in STEM A Research-Based Framework. Jim Swartz, Grinnell College. Motivation for Project. The 21 st Century Learner : To investigate diverse ways of implementing and assessing interdisciplinary learning in the sciences. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
A Multi-Institutional A Multi-Institutional Study of Study of
Interdisciplinary Interdisciplinary Teaching and Teaching and
Learning in STEMLearning in STEM
A Research-Based A Research-Based FrameworkFramework
Jim Swartz, Grinnell College
Motivation for ProjectMotivation for ProjectThe 21st Century Learner: To investigate
diverse ways of implementing and assessing interdisciplinary learning in the sciences.
To employ a multi-institutional faculty cohort to investigate interdisciplinary student learning.
To use an evidence-based approach (qualitative & quantitative).
To construct a framework for interdisciplinary understanding.
To build upon the work of others in this area of scholarly inquiry.
Collaborative Inquiry of Collaborative Inquiry of Interdisciplinary LearningInterdisciplinary Learning
Interviews with faculty & students (self-report)
Online surveys (self-report)◦Course instructors ◦Pre & post surveys of enrolled students
http://www.grinnell.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/dl/risc
• Faculty team inquiry & analysis of student work in interdisciplinary courses (performance-based)
RISCRISC
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
Trish Ferrett (Carleton College)
David Lopatto, Mark Levandoski, Vida Praitis (Grinnell College)
Joanne Stewart, Graham Peaslee (Hope College)
Jim Russo (Whitman College)
Paul Jackson, Gary Muir, Kevin Crisp (St. Olaf College)
Whitney Schlegel (Indiana University)
Carleton’s Science Education Resource Center (SERC)
Funding provided by HHMI
RISC (RISC (Research on Integrated Research on Integrated Science Curricula) Science Curricula) SurveysSurveys
Faculty survey: course goals and activities
Student pre- and post- surveys: nature of science, learning styles, confidence, and learning gains.
EMPIRICAL & SCHOLARLY - Based on research literature, previous work of project team, and faculty/student interviews.
Sample (of 50) Faculty QuestionsSample (of 50) Faculty Questions
Students read primary scientific literature.
Students work on a project or problem entirely of student's own design.
Students work on problems that have no clear solution.
Students work a project or problem entirely of student's own design.
Students study an interdisciplinary problem.
Students study problems with multiple causes that operate simultaneously and interactively.
Sample (of 50) Student QuestionsSample (of 50) Student Questions
Please rate how much learning you gained from each element you experienced in this course.
A project or problem entirely of student's own design
Working in small groups or teams.
Working on a problem that requires integrating ideas from both science and non-science disciplines.
Attempting a complete understanding of a complex problem.
Reading primary literature from multiple disciplines or fields of study.
How well did you gain an understanding of how scientists think
Even if I forget the facts, I'll still be able to use the thinking skills I learn in science.
What might we learn from RISC?What might we learn from RISC?Once survey validity is more established, we will query RISC data with more “profound” questions.
EXAMPLE: What are the relationships between degree of independent learning (pedagogy), student attitudes about nature of science, and courses with a focus on complex ID problems or systems?
Learning Goals:Learning Goals:Items from Faculty survey common to Items from Faculty survey common to “high” ID courses “high” ID courses
Students learn to ask "big questions" that implicate more than one discipline in a solution.
Students learn about two (or more) disciplines so that new insights emerge from considering them together.
Students learn to find similarities and differences between disciplines or fields of study.
Students study problems with multiple causes that operate simultaneously and interactively.
Pedagogies:Pedagogies:Items from Faculty survey common to Items from Faculty survey common to “high” ID courses “high” ID courses
Students engage in class discussionStudents spend the entire course on one or a few
problemsStudents work on problems that have no clear
solutionStudents learn about two (or more) disciplines so that
new insights emerge from considering them togetherStudents have input on design of a project
Results & Lessons from RISC SurveyResults & Lessons from RISC Survey
Language matters!
Students’ reports on prominent learning gains align with faculty - and high learning gains reported by students.
Faculty reports on learning goals and pedagogies are consistent with research literature on interdisciplinarity.
High ID RISC items resonate with qualitative findings.
Scholarly Inquiry by Faculty Cohort: Scholarly Inquiry by Faculty Cohort: Analysis of Student WorkAnalysis of Student Work
10 faculty, 1-3 from each of 5 colleges (Carleton, Grinnell, Hope, St. Olaf, Whitman)
Faculty and cohort inquiry into student learning in their own courses using qualitative methods of analyzing student work
Interdisciplinary Courses: Interdisciplinary Courses: Qualitative WorkQualitative WorkTwo traditional disciplinary disciplines merged
Introductory biology and chemistry integrated courseDefined interdisciplinary area
Neuroscience (senior capstone & introductory course) Bioinformatics (mid-level)
Problem-based drawing upon multiple disciplines Health Sciences
Senior seminar on infectious diseases Environmental Science
First-year seminar on renewable energy Mid-level course on abrupt climate change Senior research capstone for environmental science majors
Interdisciplinary
Understanding
Integration
Engaging
Complexity
Engaging
Disciplines
Learning Communities
Personal Connection
BuildingUnderstandi
ng
Return, Revise, Reflect
Findings: Emergent FrameworkFindings: Emergent Framework